Background: Many studies have demonstrated improved arm pain (AP) following surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR); however, axial neck pain (NP) is generally not felt to improve. The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgery for DCR improves NP. Methods: A ambispective cohort study of the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) registry for patients

who received 1-level, 2-level, 3-level ADCF (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for DCR. Outcomes: 12-month post-operative Visual Analogue Scale for NP (VAS-NP), Neck Disability Index (NDI), VAS for AP (VAS-AP), Short-Form Physical Health Composite Scale (SF36-PCS), and Mental Health Composite Scale (SF36-MCS). Results: We identified 603 patients with DCR. CDA patients were the youngest (ANOVA; p<0.001). Patients reported similar pre-operative AP, NP, disability, and health-related quality of life, regardless of procedure (ANOVA; all P>0.05). All procedures offered a statistically significant reduction in VAS-NP, VAS-AP, and NDI (ANOVA; all P<0.001). Mean change from baseline in NP, AP, and disability, were similar across procedures. At 12 months, mean reduction in VAS-AP, VAS-NP, and NDI exceeded minimal clinically important differences for nearly all procedures. Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgery for DCR can expect a clinically significant, approximate 50% reduction in NP, AP, and neck-related disability.

Background: Insertion of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is performed to treat elevated intracranial pressure. EVD catheters are associated with complications such as EVD catheter infection (ECI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and suboptimal catheter placement. As part of the Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative, we sought to investigate the national rate of such complications and their risk factors. Methods: Prospective study of 273 patients from eight academic Canadian neurosurgery centres Results: Infection rate was 6% and predicted by smaller incisions and not peri-procedure antibiotics, tunneling distance, type of antiseptic used or catheter flushing (p>0.05). The mean duration of EVD was 17.7±3.7 in ECI and ventriculitis group which was significantly higher than in patients without ECI (9.4±8.1) (p=0.045). Although the risk of developing ICH was 9.3%, symptomatic ICH was rare. Pre-procedure pharmacological DVT prophylaxis predicted EVD-related ICH(OR 4.73). The rate of suboptimal catheter location was 31% and predicted by the number of passes (p=0.02), but not image guidance, level of training or catheter placement in an operating room setting (p>0.05). Conclusions: This study reports EVD complication rates and their associated risk factors observed within an academic, multicentre Canadian cohort. This information will help to identify strategies to increase the safety of this common neurosurgical procedure.

Background: Cervical sponylotic myelopathy (CSM) may present with neck and arm pain. This study investiagtes the change in neck/arm pain post-operatively in CSM. Methods: This ambispective study llocated 402 patients through the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network. Outcome measures were the visual analogue scales for neck and arm pain (VAS-NP and VAS-AP) and the neck disability index (NDI). The thresholds for minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for VAS-NP and VAS-AP were determined to be 2.6 and 4.1. Results: VAS-NP improved from mean of 5.6±2.9 to 3.8±2.7 at 12 months (P<0.001). VAS-AP improved from 5.8±2.9 to 3.5±3.0 at 12 months (P<0.001). The MCIDs for VAS-NP and VAS-AP were also reached at 12 months. Based on the NDI, patients were grouped into those with mild pain/no pain (33%) versus moderate/severe pain (67%). At 3 months, a significantly high proportion of patients with moderate/severe pain (45.8%) demonstrated an improvement into mild/no pain, whereas 27.2% with mild/no pain demonstrated worsening into moderate/severe pain (P <0.001). At 12 months, 17.4% with mild/no pain experienced worsening of their NDI (P<0.001). Conclusions: This study suggests that neck and arm pain responds to surgical decompression in patients with CSM and reaches the MCIDs for VAS-AP and VAS-NP at 12 months.

Background: External ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is a common neurosurgical procedure performed in patients with life-threatening conditions, but can be associated with complications. The objectives of this study are to evaluate data on national practice patterns and complications rates in order to optimize clinical care Methods: The Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative conducted a prospective multi-centre registry of patients undergoing EVD insertions at Canadian residency programs Results: In this interim analysis, 4 sites had recruited 46 patients (mean age: 53.9 years, male:female 2:1). Most EVD insertions occurred outside of the operating theatre, using free-hand technique, and performed by junior neurosurgery residents (R1-R3). The catheter tip was in the ipsilateral frontal horn or body of the lateral ventricle in 76% of cases. Suboptimally placed catheters did not have higher rates of short-term occlusion. EVD-related hemorrhage occurred in 6.5% (3/45) with only 1 symptomatic patient. EVD-related infection occurred in 13% (6/46) at a mean of 6 days and was associated with longer duration of CSF drainage (P=0.039; OR: 1.13) Conclusions: Interim results indicate rates of EVD-related complications may be higher than previously thought. This study will continue to recruit patients to confirm these findings and determine specific risk factors associated with them

Background: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous syndrome classically associated with mental disability, seizure disorder and adenoma sebaceum, among other anomalies. One of the major causes of mortality and morbidity in adults is the exclusive occurrence of subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) which responds in at least 35% of cases to everolimus, mTOR inhibitor. However, drug treatment is associated with 33% rate of adverse events and requires long-term treatment Methods: In this report, we present a case of 49-year old female with TSC and a left enlarging SEGA that was approached endoscopically in order to minimize morbidity associated with open surgical approaches. Results: The use of NICO Myriad system is described in this case to achieve successful tumor debulking without post-operative neurologic morbidity. Conclusions: This report reveals the value of minimally invasive neuroendoscopic techniques in the management of challenging intraventricular tumors while avoiding injury to crucial deep venous structures.

Background: Neurosurgical residents face a unique combination of challenges, including long duty hours, technically challenging cases, and uncertain employment prospects. We sought to assess the demographics, interests, career goals, self-rated happiness, and overall well-being of Canadian neurosurgery residents. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was developed and sent through the Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative to every resident enrolled in a Canadian neurosurgery program as of April 1, 2016. Results: We analyzed 76 completed surveys of 146 eligible residents (52% response rate). The median age was 29 years, with 76% of respondents being males. The most popular subspecialties of interest for fellowship were spine, oncology, and open vascular neurosurgery. The most frequent self-reported number of worked hours per week was the 80- to 89-hour range. The majority of respondents reported a high level of happiness as well as stress. Sense of accomplishment and fatigue were reported as average to high and overall quality of life was low for 19%, average for 49%, and high for 32%. Satisfaction with work-life balance was average for 44% of respondents and was the only tested domain in which significant dissatisfaction was identified (18%). Overall, respondents were highly satisfied with their choice of specialty, choice of program, surgical exposure, and work environment; however, intimidation was reported in 36% of respondents and depression by 17%. Conclusions: Despite a challenging residency and high workload, the majority of Canadian neurosurgery residents are happy and satisfied with their choice of specialty and program. However, work-life balance, employability, resident intimidation, and depression were identified as areas of active concern.

Background: No standardized method of resident operative-case logging exists. Our study sought to develop a standardized form used by residents to log operative-cases. Methods: Members of the Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative (CNRC), a national resident-led research organization have created a standardized document based on the current Royal College objectives for operative procedures (section 5). Modifications to structure and content will be guided via consensus from Canadian neurosurgery program-directors. Results: Program directors in each CNRC collaborative institution will be asked to modify the standardized form. The CNRC currently involves thirteen of the fourteen Canadian neurosurgery residency programs. Additional consensus, if necessary, can be reached at the Royal College meeting for program directors of neurosurgery March 20th 2017. Conclusions: A standardized operative-case log represents the first step in a prospective study towards compiling operative volume of all Canadian neurosurgical residents over one academic year. Such data will be essential to guide informed decisions with regard to Royal College requirements as Canadian neurosurgical programs transition to a competency based framework.

Background: Communicating with senior neurosurgical colleagues during residency necessitates a reliable and versatile smartphone. Smartphones and their apps are commonplace. They enhance communication with colleagues, provide the ability to access patient information and results, and allow access to medical reference applications. Patient data safety and compliance with the Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA, 2004) in Canada remain a public concern that can significantly impact the way in which mobile smartphones are utilized by resident physicians Methods: Through the Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative (CNRC), an online survey characterizing smartphone ownership and utilization of apps among Canadian neurosurgery residents and fellows was completed in April 2016. Results: Our study had a 47% response rate (80 surveys completed out of 171 eligible residents and fellows). Smartphone ownership was almost universal with a high rate of app utilization for learning and facilitating the care of patients. Utilization of smartphones to communicate and transfer urgent imaging with senior colleagues was common. Conclusions: Smartphone and app utilization is an essential part of neurosurgery resident workflow. In this study we characterize the smartphone and app usage within a specialized cohort of residents and suggest potential solutions to facilitate greater PHIPA adherence

Background: The Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative (CNRC) was founded in November 2015 as a resident-led national network for multicentre research. We present an annual report of our activities. Methods: CNRC meetings and publications were reviewed and summarized. The status of ongoing and future studies was collected from project leaders. Results: In its first year, the CNRC produced two papers accepted for publication in the Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences: A CNRC launch letter and a study of operative volume at Canadian neurosurgery residency programs. Three manuscripts are in preparation: 1) a study of the demographics of Canadian neurosurgery residents, 2) an assessment of mobile devices usage patterns and 3) a validation study of the most utilized neurosurgery mobile apps. In addition, protocols for two multi-centre studies are currently undergoing national Research Ethics Board review: A retrospective study of the incidence and predictors of cerebellar mutism and a prospective registry of external ventricular drain procedures and complications. The network is now a registered not-for-profit organization endorsed by the Canadian Neurosurgical Society. Conclusions: The CNRC is a feasibile, relevant and productive resident-led national research network. As the CNRC matures, we look forward to expanding the scope and impact of its projects.

Background Currently, the literature lacks reliable data regarding operative case volumes at Canadian neurosurgery residency programs. Our objective was to provide a snapshot of the operative landscape in Canadian neurosurgical training using the trainee-led Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative. Methods: Anonymized administrative operative data were gathered from each neurosurgery residency program from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014. Procedures were broadly classified into cranial, spine, peripheral nerve, and miscellaneous procedures. A number of prespecified subspecialty procedures were recorded. We defined the resident case index as the ratio of the total number of operations to the total number of neurosurgery residents in that program. Resident number included both Canadian medical and international medical graduates, and included residents on the neurosurgery service, off-service, or on leave for research or other personal reasons. Results: Overall, there was an average of 1845 operative cases per neurosurgery residency program. The mean numbers of cranial, spine, peripheral nerve, and miscellaneous procedures were 725, 466, 48, and 193, respectively. The nationwide mean resident case indices for cranial, spine, peripheral nerve, and total procedures were 90, 58, 5, and 196, respectively. There was some variation in the resident case indices for specific subspecialty procedures, with some training programs not performing carotid endarterectomy or endoscopic transsphenoidal procedures. Conclusions: This study presents the breadth of neurosurgical training within Canadian neurosurgery residency programs. These results may help inform the implementation of neurosurgery training as the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons residency training transitions to a competence-by-design curriculum.

Background: The Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative (CNRC) is a new consortium of neurosurgery residency programs set-up to facilitate the planning and implementation of multi-center studies. As a trainee-led organization, it will focus on resident-initiated, resident-driven projects. The goal of this study is to assess the demographics of Canadian neurosurgery residents, with particular focus on their academic and subspecialty interests. Methods: After approval by the CNRC, an online survey will be sent to all Canadian neurosurgery residents and fellows with reminders at 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Anonymous, basic demographic data will be collected. Specific interest towards the various subspecialties, research and academic vs community practice will be measured. The data will be crossed with the ongoing Canadian Neurosurgery Operative Landscape study to assess the impact of case volume on academic and subspecialty interests. Results: This is the first study providing a snapshot of Canadian neurosurgery residents at all levels of training. The study is ongoing and the official results will be presented at the meeting. As one of the first CNRC studies, it will also demonstrate the effectiveness of the collaborative. Conclusions: Understanding the demographics and interests of Canadian neurosurgery residents will allow the CNRC to better fulfill its mission.

Background: The Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative (CNRC) is a trainee-led multi-centre collaboration made up of representatives from 12 of 14 neurosurgical centres with residency programs. To demonstrate the potential of this collaborative network, we gathered administrative operative data from each centre in order to provide a snapshot of the operative landscape in Canadian neurosurgery. Methods: Residents from each training program provided adult neurosurgical operative data for the 2014 calendar year, including the number of surgeries in the subcategories cranial, spinal, and peripheral nerve. Because some residency programs have surgeries distributed among more than one hospital, we calculated mean case load per residency program and per hospital. Results: Interim results from 6 neurosurgery residency programs are presented (with data from other programs forthcoming). Overall, there were on average 2,352 operative cases per residency program (n=6) and 1,176 operative cases per adult hospital (n=12). Among 5 programs with more detailed operative data, the mean numbers of cranial, spinal, peripheral nerve, and miscellaneous surgeries per residency program were 757 (47%), 487 (30%), 47 (3%), and 319 (20%) respectively. Conclusions: We show as a proof-of-concept that a trainee-led nation-wide research collaborative can generate meaningful data in a Canadian context.

Background: The goals of evidence-based neurosurgery are to improve surgical outcomes, reduce complications, and provide an objective basis for altering practice. The need for higher quality studies, typically prospective and multicentre, has been growing especially in light of the evolving complexity of neurosurgical interventions and heterogeneity of patient populations. In the United Kingdom (UK), trainee-led research collaboratives have been established to tackle this problem. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the potential role for a resident-led research collaborative in neurosurgery in Canada based on the UK experience. Methods: A literature review of trainee-led collaboratives was conducted utilizing PubMed and Medline. Identified articles were reviewed for study quality and clinical relevance to explore the potential benefits of collaboratives. Results: In the UK, 27 collaboratives have been established in various specialties by trainees. Some published high quality trials with implications on their clinical fields. Evidence suggests that such endeavors improves trainees’ research skills and may help cultivate a research culture tailored towards clinical trials. Conclusions: Given the growing evidence for research collaboratives in the UK, we propose launching the Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative (CNRC) which currently represents 12 out of 14 neurosurgery programs in Canada, and planning its first multicenter prospective study.

Background: This study aims to provide epidemiological data concerning spinal instability and patterns of metastatic invasion of the spine based on tumor histology. Methods: We allocated 285 patients with spinal metastatic disease through a retrospective review. SINS was calculated using good-quality computed tomography (CT) imaging studies. Spinal metastases were also grouped into intracompartmental, extracompartmental or multiple metastases. Results: Esophageal cancer was the least likely to be associated with instability with about 64% of cases being stable. The highest rate of instability scores was observed in breast carcinoma with 18% of cases graded as unstable. Renal cell carcinoma was associated with lytic spinal metastases whereas blastic metastases mostly occurred in prostate carcinoma (P<0.001). Whereas 68.1% of cases represented multiple metastases, the remainder was associated with either intracompartmental (13.3%) or extracompartmental (18.6%) disease. The highest degrees of spinal instability (intermediate and unstable categories) were associated with extra-compartmental metastatic disease (P<0.001). Conclusions: This study sheds light on the patterns of spinal metastatic disease and mechanical instability on the basis of tumor histology, utilizing standardized scoring systems. The utilization of such scoring systems allows for a standardized approach towards description and analysis of spinal metastasis facilitating clinical research in this avenue.

Background: The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) is used to assess mechanical instability based on radiographic and clinical factors. We conducted this study to evaluate the clinical utility of SINS in surgical decision-making in spinal metastasis and its association with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Methods: We allocated 285 patients with spinal metastatic disease through a retrospective review. SINS was calculated using good-quality computed tomography. The degree of MESCC was assessed using 0 to 3 grading system. Results: Based on SINS, patients were categorized into stable (35.1%), potentially unstable (52.3%) and unstable (12.6%) groups. In the surgical intervention group, there was 69.5% treated with decompression and instrumented fusion, 17% with decompression alone, 8.5% with percutaneous vertebral augmentation and 5% with instrumented vertebral augmentation. A significantly higher proportion of patients with stable SINS (63.6%) were treated surgically without instrumentation (X2=10.6, P=0.005), whereas instrumentation was utilized in 87.5% of patients with unstable SINS. Grade 3 MESCC occurred in 65.5% of patients with unstable SINS, whereas 71.4% of patients with stable SINS had grade 0 MESCC (X2=42.1, P<0.001). Conclusions: SINS is associated with higher degrees of MESCC and plays an important role in surgical decision-making, facilitating assessment and recognition of spinal instability in need of urgent appropriate surgical interventions.

Background: The management of central cord syndrome (CCS) is controversial. There is a perception that CCS patients tend to improve without the need for surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical improvements of patients with traumatic SCI, both with and without CCS. Methods: Nova Scotia Provincial Trauma Registry was retrospectively reviewed from 2005-2010. Improvement in the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) was determined after mean 5 months follow-up. Results: The study population comprised 96 cases with SCI, subdivided into cases with AIS grade A, non-CCS cases with AIS grades B-D and CCS cases. 88% of the non-CCS and 65% of the CCS patients underwent surgical decompression, with mean operative times being 71.6±137.8 and 102.9±144.6 post injury (p=0.45). The mean improvements in the mean ASIA motor scores for the three groups were 1.3±6.5 and 15.6±35.0 and 22.5±14.6 (p=0.004) respectively, with a statistically significant difference only between the CCS and AIS grade A groups (p<0.001). 20%, 54% and 10% of the patients respectively, underwent an improvement of ≥ one AIS grades (p=0.018, c2=8.0). Conclusions: This retrospective review investigates the natural history of CCS and explores the role of surgical intervention on optimizing patient outcome.

Background: The evaluation of patients presenting with spinal metastatic disease is often challenging. The Tokuhashi scale intends to facilitate this process. We conducted this study to investigate its clinical utility in surgical-decision making in patients with spinal metastasis. Methods: The oncology database was used to allocate 285 patients with spinal metastasis between 2010 and 2015. The Tokuhashi scale components were determined from a chart review. Results: Based on the Tokuhashi scale, there was 69.1% in the non-operative/radiation group (group 1), 23.2% in the palliative/excisional surgical group (group2) and 7.7% in the surgical group (group 3). Using Kaplan-Meiers estimate, survival time was significantly different across the three groups with means 232.8±30.8, 352.3±49.2 and 568.3±206.1 days, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients (84.6%) were treated non-surgically in group 1, compared to 45.5% in group 3 (X2=19.5, P<0.001). However, there was no correlation between the type of surgical interventions (i.e. instrumented decompression, decompression alone, percutaneous vertebral augmentation and instrumented vertebral augmentation) and the Tokuhashi score. Conclusions: This review illustrates the utility of the Tokuhashi scale in predicting survival. However, it does not address the new role of emerging different surgical strategies for the treatment of spinal metastasis and lacks information concerning spinal instability.