Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:28:23.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Thomas Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, R. (1955). The Pragmatic Humanism of F. C. S. Schiller, New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
Abellán, J. L. (1979–92). Historia crítica del pensamiento español (A Critical History of Spanish Thought), Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Ackermann, W. (1928). ‘Zum Hilbertschen Aufbau der reellen Zahlen’, Mathematische Annalen 99: 118–33 Trans. Bauer-Mengelberg, S., ‘On Hilbert’s Construction of the Real Numbers’, in Heijenoort, 1967, 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, W. (1954). Solvable Cases of the Decision Problem, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Adair-Toteff, C. S. (1994). ‘The Neo-Kantian Raum Controversy’, The British Journal of the History of Philosophy 2, no. 2: 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair-Toteff, C. S. (1996). ‘Hans Vaihinger’s Kant-Studien’, Kant-Studien 87: 390–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, W. L. (1980). Hegemony and Revolution: Antonio Gramsci’s Political and Cultural TheoryBerkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Adler, R., Bazin, M., and Schiffer, M. (1965). Introduction to General Relativity, San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. and Horkheimer, M. (1944). Dialektik der Aufklärung, New York: Social Studies Association. Trans.1972 Cunning, J., Dialectic of EnlightenmentNew York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (1970). Ästhetische Theorie (Gesammelte Schriften, vol. VI), Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans.1997 Hullot-Kentor, R., Aesthetic TheoryMinneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (1973). Negative Dialektik (Gesammelte Schriften, vol. VI), Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. Ashton, E. B., Negative DialecticsLondon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1964). Jargon der Eigentlichkeit, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1973 Tarnowski, K. and Will, F., Jargon of Authenticity, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1966). Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1973 Ashton, E. B., Negative Dialectics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1955). Prismen, Berlin: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1967 , S. and Weber, S., Prisms, London: Spearman.Google Scholar
Ajdukiewicz, K. (1974). Pragmatic Logic, Warsaw and Dordrecht: The Polish Scientific Publishers–Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajdukiewicz, K. (1978). The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays, 1931–1963, ed. Giedymin, J., Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Albert, H. (1978). ‘Science and the Search for Truth’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 58: 203–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, H. (1985). Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aler, J. (1972). ‘Heidegger’s Conception of Language in Being and Time’ in Kocklemans, 1972, 33–62.Google Scholar
Alexander, S. (1920). Space, Time and Deity, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alexander, Samuel (1920). Space, Time and Deity (Gifford Lectures 1916–18), London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alexy, R. (1992). Begriff und Geltung des Rechts (Concept and Validity of the Law), Freiburg and Munich: Karl Alber. Trans. 2002 Paulson, S. L. and Paulson, B. L., The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Allard, J. (1998) ‘The Essential Puzzle of Inference’, Bradley Studies 4: 61–81.Google Scholar
Allen, Gay Wilson (1967). William James: A Biography, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Alonso Gamo, J. Ma. (1966). Un español en el mundo: Santayana (A Spaniard in the World: Santayana), Madrid: Ediciones Cultura Hispánica.Google Scholar
Amundson, R. and Smith, L. D. (1984). ‘Clark Hull, Robert Cummins, and Functional Analysis’, Philosophy of Science, 51: 657–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amundson, R. (1983). ‘E. C. Tolman and the Intervening Variable: A Study in the Epistemological History of Psychology’, Philosophy of Science, 50: 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. A. (1998). ‘Alonzo Church' contributions to philosophy and intensional logic’, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4: 129–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Perry (1976). Considerations on Western Marxism, London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Andresen, Carl(ed.) (1985ff.). Handbuch der Dogmen- und Theologiegeschichte, 3 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Angell, J. R. (1907). ‘The Province of Functional Psychology’, Psychological Review 14: 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, J. R. (1913). ‘Behavior as a Category of Psychology’, Psychological Review 20: 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1965). ‘The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature’ in Butler, R. J. (ed.), Analytical Philosophy (2nd series), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1971). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Apel, K. O. (1975). ‘The Problem of Philosophical Fundamental-Grounding in Light of a Transcendental Pragmatic of Language’, Man & World 8: 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. and Breines, P. (1979). The Young Lukács and the Origins of Western MarxismNew York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Arato, Anthony and Paul, Breines (1979). The Young Lukács and the Origins of Western Marxism, London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Araya, G. (1971). Claves filológicas para la comprensión de Ortega (Philological Keys for Ortega’s Understanding), Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Armour, Leslie and Trott, Elizabeth (1981). The Faces of Reason: Philosophy and Culture in English Canada, 1850–1950, Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. (1869). Culture & Anarchy: An Essay in Political and Social Criticism, London: Smith. New edn 1993, ed. Collini, S., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnoldt, E. (1870). Kants Transzendental Idealität des Raumes und der Zeit (Kant’s Transcendental Ideality of Space and Time), Königsberg: Albert Rosbach.Google Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asimov, I. (1964). A Short History of Biology, Garden City, NY: The Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Assoun, P.-L (1976). Freud: la philosophie et les philosophes, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Assoun, P.-L. (1980). Freud et Nietzsche, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Astrada, C. (1933). El juego existencial (The Existential Game), Buenos Aires: El Ateneo.Google Scholar
Austeda, F. (1967). ‘Avenarius’, trans. Blumberg, A. E.. In Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1979). ‘Ifs and Cans’ in Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. (1861–3). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and Lectures on Jurisprudence, 3 vols., London: Murray, J.. Reprinted 1885, 5th edn, 2 vols., ed. Campbell, Robert, London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Avenarius, R. (1888–90). Kritik der reinen Erfahrung (Critique of Pure Experience), Leipzig: O.R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language Truth and Logic, London: Gollancz. 2nd edn 1946, London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1940). The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1971). Russell and Moore: The Analytical Heritage, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1972). Russell, London: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (ed.) (1959). Logical Positivism, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred Jules (1946). Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd edn, London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (1929). Valeur inductive de la relativité (The Inductive Value of Relativity), Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (1933). Les intuitions atomistiques: essai de classification (Atomistic Intuitions: A Classification), Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (1969). Essai sur la connaissance approchée (Essay on the Approach to Knowledge), Paris: Vrin. Trans. in Jones, (1991).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (1973). Le Nouvel Esprit scientifique (The New Scientific Spirit), Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. in Jones, (1991).Google Scholar
Bain, A. (1855). The Senses and the Intellect, London: Parker & Son.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1926). ‘Contemporary Vitalism’, Chelovek I Priroda (Man and Nature), vols. I and II (published under the name Kanaev, I.). Trans. 1992 in Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (eds.), The Crisis in Modernism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, 76–97.Google Scholar
Bakunin, M. A. (1842). ‘Die Reaktion in Deutschland’, Deutsche Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Kunst. Trans. and ed. 1965 Edie, J. M., Scanlon, J. P., and Zeldin, M.-B., ‘The Reaction in Germany’, Russian Philosophy, 3 vols., Chicago: Quadrangle Books, vol. I, 384–406.Google Scholar
Bakunin, M. A. (1873). Gosudarstivennost’ I anarkhiia, Geneva. Trans. 1990 Shatz, M. S., Statism and Anarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1889). Handbook of Psychology, vol. I, Senses and Intellect, New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1891). Handbook of Psychology, vol. II, Feeling and Will, London: Macmillan and New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. (1891). Handbook of Psychology: Feeling and Will, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. (1990). G. E. Moore, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Z. and Fraenkel, A. (1958). Foundations of Set Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Barbour, J. B. (1982). ‘Relational Concepts of Space and Time’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33: 251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, J. (1999). ‘The Development of Machian Themes in the Twentieth Century’ in Butterfield, J. (ed.), The Arguments of Time, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 83–109.Google Scholar
Barbour, J. B. and Pfister, H. (eds.) (1995). Mach’s Principle; From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Barcan, R. (1946a). ‘A Functional Calculus of First-order Based on Strict Implication’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 11: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcan, R. (1946b). ‘The Deduction Theorem in a Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 11: 115–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcan, R. (1947). ‘The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 12: 12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendregt, H. (1997). ‘The Impact of the Lambda Calculus in Logic and Computer Science’, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3: 181–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, W. H. F. (1934). ‘A Suggestion about Values’, Analysis 1: 45–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, W. H. F. (1948). ‘Ethics without Propositions’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. XXII: 1–30.Google Scholar
Barnes, W. H. (1945). ‘The Myth of Sense-Data’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45. Reprinted 1965 in Swarz, R. (ed.), Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing, New York: Doubleday, 138–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bars, H. (1959). Maritain en notre temps, Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Bars, H. (1962). La politique selon Jacques Maritain, Paris: Editions ouvrières.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1922). Der Römerbrief, Zurich. Trans. 1933 Hoskyns, E., The Epistle to the Romans, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1932–67). Die kirchliche Dogmatik, Munich. Trans. 1936–69 Thomson, G. et al., Church Dogmatics, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1947). Die protestantische Theologie im 19 Jahrhundert, Zurich. Trans. 1972 Cozens, B. and Bowden, J., Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century, London: SCM.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1962). ‘The Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann’ in Theology and Church, London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. (1960). Church Dogmatics III, 2, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Barth, P. (1897). Die Philosophie der Geschichte als Soziologie, Erster Teil, 1st edn. (The Philosophy of History as Sociology, first part), Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Barth, P. (1899). ‘Fragen der Geschichtswissenschaft: I, Darstellende und begriffliche Geschichte’ (‘Questions of Historical Science: I, Descriptive and Conceptual History’), Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie (Quarterly for Scientific Philosophy) 23: 322–59Google Scholar
Barth, P. (1915). Die Philosophie der Geschichte als Soziologie, (The Philosophy of History as Sociology), 2nd rev. edn, Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Bauer, O. (1907). Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie, Vienna. Trans. 2000 O'Donnell, J., The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb (1735). Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus, Halle: Johann Heinrich Grunert. Modern edition with German translation 1983: Paetzold, Heinz, Philosophische Betrachtungen über einige Bedingungen des Gedichtes, Hamburg: Felix Meiner. English translation 1954 Aschenbrenner, K. and Holther, W. B., Reflections on Poetry, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, W. (1987). ‘Die Begründung von Wahrheit durch Evidenz. Der Beitrag Brentanos’ in Gewissheit und Gewissen. Festschrift für Franz Wiedmann zum 60. Geburtstag, Würzburg: Koenigshausen and Neumann, 93–116.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. C. (1993). Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. C. (1998). ‘Vitalism’ in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. IX, ed. Craig, E., London: Routledge, 639–43.Google Scholar
Beck, L. W. (1967). ‘Neo-Kantianism’, Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edwards, P., vol. V, 468–73.Google Scholar
Beckerman, A. (1992). ‘Supervenience, Emergence, and Reduction’ in Beckermann, A. et al., Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.) (1992). Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckner, M. (1972). ‘Vitalism’ in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. VIII, ed. Edwards, P., New York: Macmillan, 253–56.Google Scholar
Beetham, D. (1985). Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Behmann, H. (1922). ‘Beiträge zur Algebra der Logik, insbesondere zum Entscheidungsproblem’, Mathematische Annalen 88: 163–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beintker, M. (1976). Die Gottesfrage in der Theologie Wilhelm Herrmann (The Question of God in Wilhelm Herrmann’s Theology), Berlin: Evangelische Verlaganstalt.Google Scholar
Bell, Clive (1914). Art, London: Chatto and Windus. Repr. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1958.Google Scholar
Bell, D. and Vossenkuhl, W. (1992). Science and Subjectivity: The Vienna Circle and Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1979). Frege’s Theory of Judgement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1990). Husserl, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1996). ‘Solipsism and Subjectivity’, European Journal of Philosophy 4: 155–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. (1996). ‘The Formation of Concepts and the Structure of Thoughts’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 583–96.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. P. (1992). Liberalism and Modern Society: A Historical Argument, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. P. (2000). Rethinking Liberalism, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. and Schecter, D. (1993). Gramsci and the Italian StateManchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (1992). Liberalism and Modern Society: An Historical Argument, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bello, Andrés (1880). Filosofía del entendimiento (Philosophy of Understanding). Originally written in 1854, published posthumously in 1880. Repr. 1946, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Benda, J. (1927). La Trahison des Clercs, Paris. Trans. 1928 Aldington, R., The Treason of the Intellectuals, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bendersky, J. (1983). Carl Schmitt: Theorist for the ReichPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of Culture, New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Beneke, F. E. (1833). Lehrbuch der Psychologie, Berlin: Ernst Siegfried Mittler.Google Scholar
Beneke, F. E. (1845). Lehrbuch der Psychologie als Naturwissenschaft, 2nd edn, Berlin: Bosen und Bromberg.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., Bonss, W., and McCole, J. (1993). On Max Horkheimer: New PerspectivesCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1968). Illuminations, ed. with an introduction by Arendt, Hannah, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1978). Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, ed. Demetz, Peter, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bentham, G. (1827). Outline of a New System of Logic, London: Hunt and Clarke.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1970). Of Laws in General, ed. Hart, H. L. A., London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Berdiaev, N. A. (1901) Sub”ektivizm i individualizm v obshchestvennoi filosofii. Kriticheskii etiud o N. K. Mikhailovskom (Subjectivism and Individualism in Social Philosophy. A Critical Study of N. K. Mikhailovskii), St Petersburg: Popova.Google Scholar
Berdiaev, N. A. (1916) Smysl tvorchestva. Opyt opravdaniia cheloveka, Moscow: Leman and Sakharov. Trans. Lowrie, D. A. 1955, The Meaning of the Creative Act, New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
Berdiaev, N. A. (1923) Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovechekoi sud'by, Berlin: Obelisk. Trans. Reavey, G. 1936, The Meaning of History, London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
Berdiaev, N. A. (1939) O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. Opyt personalistickeskoi filosofii, Paris: YMCA Press. Trans French, R. M. 1943, Slavery and Freedom, London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
Bergman, P. G. (1942). Introduction to the Theory of Relativity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bergmann, G. and Spence, K. W. (1941). ‘Operationism and Theory in Psychology’, Psychological Review 48: 1–14 Reprinted 1960 in Spence, K. W., Behavior Theory and Learning: Selected Papers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 3–16.Google Scholar
Bergmann, J. (1879). Allgemeine Logik, I. Reine Logik, Berlin: Mittler.Google Scholar
Bergmann, P. (1965). ‘Physics and Geometry’ in Bar-Hillel, Y., Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science; Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishers, 343–46.Google Scholar
Bergmann, P. (1980). Remarks in ‘Open Discussion’ following papers by Hawking, S. and Unruh, W. in Woolf, H. (ed.), Some Strangeness in the Proportion, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishers, 156.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1889). Essai sur les donnes immédiates de la conscience, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1910 Pogson, F. L., Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1889). Quid Aristoteles de Loco Senserit. Doctoral thesis. Trans. into French 1949 Mosse-Bastide, R., L'Idée de lieu chez Aristote, Les Etudes bergsoniennes, vol. II.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1896). Matière et mémoire: essai sur la relation du corps à l'esprit, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1991 Paul, N. Margaret and Palmer, W. Scott, Matter and Memory, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1900). Le Rire: essai sur la signification du comique, Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1985 Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1911 Brereton, C. and Rothwell, F., Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1903). ‘Introduction à la métaphysique’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 29: 1–36. Reprinted 1987 in La Pensée et le Mouvant: Essais et conférences, Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1912 Hulme, T. E.Introduction to Metaphysics, New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1903). ‘Introduction à la metaphysique’, Revue de la metaphysique et de morale, 11: 1–36 Trans. 1913 Hulme, T. E., An Introduction to Metaphysics, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1985.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1907). L'Évolution créatrice, Paris: Alcan. Reprinted 1986 Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1911 Mitchell, A., Creative Evolution, New York: Holt and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1911). L'Intuition philosophique, Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1987 in La Pensée et le mouvant: Essais et conférences., Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1919). L'Énergie spirituelle, Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1985 Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1920 Wildon-Carr, H.Mind-Energy: Lectures and Essays, New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1922). Durée et Simultanéité: à propos de la théorie d'Einstein., Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1972 in Robinet, A. (ed.), Mélanges., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1956 Dingle, H., Duration and Simultaneity, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1932). Les Deux Sources de la morale et de la religion, Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1988 Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1935 Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C., The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1934). La Pensée et le mouvant: essais et conférences, Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1987 Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1946 Andison, M. L., The Creative Mind, New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1896)Mati ère et mémoire: essai sur la relation du corps à l'esprit, Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1985 Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1911 Paul, N. M. and Palmer, W. Scott, Matter and Memory, New York: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1889). Essai sur les données immédiates de la perception, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1910 Pogson, F. L., Time and Free Will, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1896). Matière et mémoire, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1911 Paul, N. M. and Palmer, W. S., Matter and Memory, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1907). L'évolution créatrice, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1911 Mitchell, A., Creative Evolution, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1932). Les Deux Sources de la morale et de la réligion, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1935 Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C., The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1959). Oeuvres (Works), ed. Robinet, André and introduced by Gouhier, Henri. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1901). De Motu, vol. III, § 37, in Fraser, A. C. (ed.), Works, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernays, P. (1922). ‘Die Bedeutung Hilberts für die Philosophie der Mathematik’, Die Naturwissenschaften 2: 93–9. Trans. 1998 Mancosu, P.Hilbert’s Significance for the Philosophy of Mathematics’, in Mancosu, (ed.) 1998, 189–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernays, P. (1926). ‘Axiomatische Untersuchung des Aussagen-Kalküls der Principia Mathematica’ (‘Axiomatic Investigation of the Propositional Calculus of Principia Mathematica’), Mathematische Zeitschrift 25: 305–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernays, P. (1967). ‘Hilbert, David’ (1862–43) in Edwards, P., (ed.) Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. III: 496–504. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, Friedrich von (1912). Germany and the Next War, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo (1965). The Fictions of Life and of Art, New York and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beveridge, W. (1945). Why I am a Liberal, London: Herbert Jenkins.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, K. C. (1976). The Search for the Absolute in Neo-Vedanta, ed. Burch, G. Bosworth, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Bibby, Cyril. (1960). Scientist, Humanist and Educator, New York and London: Horizon Press.Google Scholar
Biemel, W. (1972). ‘Poetry and Language in Heidegger’ in Kockelmans, 1972: 65–105Google Scholar
Biemel, W. (1977). Martin Heidegger: An Illustrated Study, trans. Mehta, J. L., London: Routledge, chs. 4 and 6.Google Scholar
Billington, J. H. (1958) Mikhailovskii and Russian Populism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Binder, J. (1931). Review of Hägerström, A., Der römische Obligationsrecht im Lichte der allgemeinen römischen Rechtsanschauung (The Roman Concept of Obligation in Light of the General Roman View of the Law) (1927), Kritische Vierteljahrsschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, 24: 269–315Google Scholar
Binet, A. (1891). Les altérations de la personnalité, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1896 Baldwin, H., Alterationsof Personality, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Bird, G. (1986). William James, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1954). ‘Carnap on Semantics and Logic’ in Black, M., Problems of Analysis, London: Routledge, 255–90.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1966). Language and Philosophy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Black, R. D. C. (1972). ‘W. S. Jevons and the Foundations of Modern Economics’, History of Political Economy 4: 364–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, J. T. (1995). Ludwig Boltzmann; his Later Life and Philosophy, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Blanshard, B. (1939). The Nature of Thought, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Blanshard, B. (1939). The Nature of Thought, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blau, Joseph (1952). Men and Movements in American Philosophy, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. (1972). ‘Was There a Marginal Revolution?’, History of Political Economy 4: 269–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliltz, D. (1992). Emergent Evolution: Qualitative Novelty and the Levels of Reality, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1893). L'Action. Essai d'une critique de la vie et d'une science de la pratique (Essay on a Critique of Life and a Science of Practice), Paris: Alcan. Repr. 1950 in Les Premiers écrits de Maurice Blondel, vol. I, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1984 Blanchette, Oliva, Action, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1893). L'Action: essai d'une critique de la vie et d'une science de la pratique, Paris: Alcan. Further edns, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950 and 1973.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1893). Le lien substantiel et la substance composée d'après Leibniz (Latin text 1893), trans. Troisfontaines, C., Paris–Louvain: Béatrice Nauwelaerts, 1972.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1896). ‘Lettre sur les exigences de la pensée contemporaine en matière d'apologétique et sur la methode de la philosophie dans l'étude du problème religieux’, Annales de philosophie chrétienne 131 and 132. Repr. Blondel, Maurice 1956, Premiers écrits, vol. II, 5–95. Trans. 1964 Dru, A. and Trethowan, I., The Letter on Apologetics and History and Dogma, London: Harvill Press.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1904). ‘Histoire et dogma: Les lacunes philosophiques de l'exégesé moderne’, La Quinzaine 56. Reprinted 1956, Premiers écrits, vol. II, 149 ff. Trans. 1964 Dru, A. and Trethowan, I., The Letter on Apologetics and History and Dogma, London: Harvill Press.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1932). Le Problème de la philosophie catholique, Paris: Bloud et Gay.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1934). La Pensée (Thought), 2 vols., Paris: Alcan. Reprinted 1948 and 1954, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1935). L'Etre et les Etres, Paris: Alcan. 2nd edn, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1963.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1944–6). La philosophie et l'esprit chrétien (Philosophy and the Christian Spirit), 2 vols., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1944). La Philosophie et l'Esprit chrétien, Paris: Alcan. 2nd edn, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1948, 1954). La Pensée, 2 vols., Paris: Alcan. 2nd edn, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, vol. I, 1948, vol. II, 1954.Google Scholar
Blondel, Maurice (1949, 1963). L'Action, 2 vols., Paris: Alcan, 1936–7. Second edition, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, vol. I, 1949, vol. II, 1963.Google Scholar
Boas, F. (1940). Race, Language and Culture, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Boekraad, A. J. and Henry, Tristram. (1961). The Argument from Conscience to the Existence of God, Louvain: Editions Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Boekraad, A. J. (1955). The Personal Conquest of Truth, Louvain: Editions Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Bogumil, Gacka (1994). Bibliography of American Personalism, Lublin: Oficyna Wydawnicza, Czas.Google Scholar
Bogumil, Gacka (1995). American Personalism, Lublin: Oficyna Wydawnicza, Czas.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. (1965). The Special Theory of Relativity, New York: W. A. Benjamin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boi, L. (1995). Le problème mathématique de l espace. Une quête de l'intelligible, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Boi, L. (1999). ‘Some Mathematical, Epistemological and Historical Reflections on the Relationship between Geometry and Reality, Spacetime Theory and the Geometrization of Theoretical Physics, from B. Riemann to H. Weyl and Beyond’, Preprint C.A.M.S. (EHESS, Paris) no. 176: 1–41.Google Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1891). Vorlesungen über Maxwells Theorie der Elektricität und des Lichts (Lectures on Maxwell’s Theory of Electricity and Light), Leipzig: J. Barth.Google Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1896). Vorlesungen über Gastheorie, Leipzig: J. Barth. Trans. 1964 Brush, S. G., Lectures on Gas Theory, Oxford and London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1979). Populäre Schriften (Popular Essays), Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzano, B. (1837). Wissenschaftslehre, 4 vols., Sulzbach: Seidel. Trans. 1972 George, R., Theory of Science, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolzano, B. (1851). Dr. Bernard Bolzano’s Paradoxien des Unendlichen, herausgegeben aus dem schriftlichen Nachlasse des Verfassers von Dr. Fr. Prihonsky, Leipzig: Reclam. Trans. 1950 Steele, D. A., Paradoxes of the Infinite, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C. (1755). Essai de psychologie, London.Google Scholar
Bonola, R. (1912). Non–Euclidean Geometry: A Critical and Historical Study of its Development, Chicago: Open Court. Repr. 1955, New York: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1921). ‘Notes on Science and Life’, appended to a typescript of an Aristotelian Society Paper read at 21 Gower Street, London, 7 March 1921, Boodin Archive, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1925). Cosmic Evolution, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1934). God: A Cosmic Philosophy of Religion, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1939). The Social Mind, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boole, G. (1847). The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, London: G. Bell. Repr. 1948 Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boole, G. (1854). The Laws of Thought, London: Walton and Maberley. Repr. 1951 New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Boolos, G. (1998). Logic, Logic and Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Borel, E. (1908). Leçons Sur la Théorie des Fonctions [Lectures on the Theory of Functions], Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Borel, E. et al. (1905). ‘Cinq Lettres Sur la Théorie des Ensembles’, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 33: 261–73. Trans. 1982 Moore, G., ‘Five Letters on Set Theory’, in Moore, 1982, 311–20 or Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 1077–86.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology, New York: Century, 2nd edn 1950, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology, New York: Century. 2nd edn 1950. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1883) ‘Logic as the Science of Knowledge’ in Seth, A. and Haldane, R. B. (eds.), Essays in Philosophical Criticism, London: Longmans. 2nd edn 1928, corrected impression 1928.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1885). Knowledge and Reality: A Criticism of Mr. F. H. Bradley’s ‘Principles of Logic’, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1888). Logic, or the Morphology of Knowledge, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd edn 1911.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1889). Essays and Addresses, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1889). The Philosophical Theory of the State, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1892). History of Aesthetic, London: Swan Sonnenschein, 2nd edn 1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1893). The Civilization of Christendom and Other Studies, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1895a). A Companion to Plato’s Republic for English Readers: Being a Commentary adapted to Davies and Vaughan’s Translation, London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1895b). The Essentials of Logic Being Ten Lectures On Judgement and Inference, London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1897). Psychology of the Moral Self, London and New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1899) The Philosophical Theory of the State, London: Macmillan. 4th edn 1923, repr. 1965.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1899). The Philosophical Theory of the State, London: Macmillan, 4th edn 1923. New edn 2001, Gaus, G. F. and Sweet, W. (eds.), B. Bosanquet: The Philosophical Theory of the State and Related Essays, South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1912) The Principle of Individuality and Value, The Gifford Lectures for 1911, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1913) The Value and Destiny of the Individual, The Gifford Lectures for 1912. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1915). Three Lectures on Aesthetic, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1917). Social and International Ideals: Being Studies in Patriotism, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1918). Some Suggestions in Ethics, London: Macmillan, 2nd edn 1919.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1920) Implication and Linear Inference, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1920a). Implication and Linear Inference, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1920b). What Religion Is, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1921). The Meeting of Extremes in Contemporary Philosophy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1927) Science and Philosophy and Other Essays, ed. Muirhead, J. H. and Bosanquet, R. C., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1927). Science and Philosophy and Other Essays, Muirhead, J. H. and Bosanquet, R.C. (eds.), London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1934). A History of Aesthetics, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1999a). The Collected Works of Bernard Bosanquet, vol. I: Selected Essays, Sweet, W. (ed.), Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1999b). The Collected Works of Bernard Bosanquet, vol. XIV: Essays on ‘Aspects of the Social Problem’ and Essays on Social Policy, Sweet, W. (ed.), Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard (1892). A History of Aesthetic, London: George Unwin. 2nd edn 1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard (1915). Three Lectures on Aesthetic, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, H. (1924). Bernard Bosanquet: A Short Account of his Life, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bottomore, Tom and Goode, Patrick (eds.) (1978). Austro-Marxism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, David and Vincent, Andrew (2000). British Idealism and Political Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bouillard, Henri (1969). Blondel and Christianity. Trans. Caron, L. P., Washington: Corpus Books.Google Scholar
Bourdet, Yves (1970). Introduction to Hilferding, R., Le Capital financier, Paris: Minuit, 9–52.Google Scholar
Boutroux, E. (1879). De la contingence des lois de la nature, Paris: Alcan. Trans. Rothwell, F. 1916, The Contingency of the Laws of Nature, Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bowie, Malcolm (1998). Proust among the Stars, London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Bowne, B. P. (1908). Personalism, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1876). Ethical Studies, London: King, 2nd edn 1927, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1883) The Principles of Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2nd edn 1922; 2nd edn corrected 1928.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1893). Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay, 1st edn, London: Swan Sonnenschein and Co.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1893). Appearance and Reality, 2nd edn 1906, 9th corrected impression, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1895). ‘On the supposed uselessness of the soul’, Mind n.s. 4, 176–9. Repr. 1935 in Collected Essays, vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 343–7.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1902a). ‘On active attention’, Mind n.s. 11, 1–30. Repr. 1935 in Collected Essays, vol. II, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 408–43.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1902b). ‘On mental conflict and imputation’, Mind n.s. 11, 289–315. Reprinted 1935 in Collected Essays, vol. II, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 444–75.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1914) Essays on Truth and Reality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1927). Ethical Studies, 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1935) Collected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press. New edn 1969.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. (1979) ‘Hegel in Britain: A Brief History of British Commentary and Attitudes’, Heythrop Journal 20: 1–24; 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J. (1996). ‘Act, Event, Series: Metaphysics, Mathematics, and Whitehead’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy 10: 233–48Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. (1928). ‘Verbal Ambiguity and Philosophical Analysis’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 28: 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. (1933). ‘Solipsism and the “Common Sense View of the World” ’, Analysis 1: 13–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandell, G. (1979). Freud: A Man of his Century, trans. White, I., Sussex: Harvester.Google Scholar
Brent, J. (1993). Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1862). Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristotle, Freiburg i. B.: Herder. Trans. 1975 George, R., On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. 2nd edn by Kraus1, O., 1924, Leipzig: Meiner. Trans. 1973 Rancurello, A.C., Terrell, D. B., and MacAlister, L. L., Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Trans. 1995 McAlister, L. L. (ed.), Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, 2nd Engl. edn, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig: Duncker and Humboldt. Trans. 1973 Rancurello, A., Terrell, D., and McAlister, L. L., Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, vol. I, edited by Kraus, Oskar in 1924, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. Trans. 1973 Rancurello, A., Terrell, D., and McAlister, L., Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1889). Vom Ursprung sittlicher Erkenntnis, Leipzig: Duncker and Humboldt. Trans. 1969 Chisholm, R. M. (ed.), The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1928). Vom sinnlichen und noetischen Bewusstsein. Vol. III of Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig: Meiner. Trans. 1981 McAlister, L. L., Sensory and Noetic Consciousness, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1930). Wahrheit und Evidenz, Leipzig: Meiner. Trans. Chisholm, R. M., Politzer, I., and Fischer, K. R., The True and the Evident, London: Routledge, 1966.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1933). Kategorienlehre, Leipzig: Meiner. Trans. 1981 Chisholm, R. and Guterman, N., The Theory of Categories, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1952). Grundlegung und Aufbau der Ethik, Berne: Francke. Trans. 1973, Schneewind, E. H. (ed.), The Foundation and Construction of Ethics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1956). Die Lehre vom richtigen Urteil, Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1966). Die Abkehr vom Nichtrealen (The Turn From the Non-Real), Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1976). Philosophische Untersuchungen zu Raum, Zeit, und Kontinuum, Hamburg: Meiner. Trans. 1987 Smith, B., Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time, and the Continuum, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1982). Deskriptive Psychologie, Hamburg: Meiner. Trans. 1995 Müller, B., Descriptive Psychology, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W. (1936). The Nature of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ: University Press.Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W. (1955). Reflections of a Physicist, New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Brightman, E. S. (1930). The Problem of God, New York: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Brightman, E. S. (1940). A Philosophy of Religion, New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1914). Perception, Physics and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1923). Scientific Thought, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1925). The Mind and Its Place in Nature, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1928). ‘Analysis of Some Ethical Concepts’, Journal of Philosophical Studies (Philosophy) 3; reprinted in Broad, 1971, 63–81.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1930). Five Types of Ethical Theory, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1934). ‘Is “Goodness” a Name of a Simple Non-Natural Quality?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34; reprinted in Broad, 1971, 106–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1945). ‘Some Reflections on Moral-Sense Theories in Ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45; reprinted in Broad, 1971, 188–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1971). Broad’s Critical Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. Cheney, D., London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. E. J. (1908). ‘De onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes’, Tijdschrift voor wijsbegeerte 2: 152–8. Trans. 1975 Heyting, A., ‘The Unreliability of the Logical Principles’, in Brouwer, L. E. J. (ed. Heyting, A.), Collected Works. Volume 1. Amsterdam, Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Co. (1975), 107–11.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. E. J. (1948). ‘Consciousness, Philosophy and Mathematics’, Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Philosophy, Amsterdam, 1948, 1235–49. Repr. 1975 in Brouwer, L. E. J., Collected Works, ed. Heyting, A., vol. I, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 480–94.Google Scholar
Browder, F. E. ed. (1976). Mathematical Developments Arising from Hilbert Problems. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, XXVIII. Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Brunner, E. (1927). Die Religionsphilosophie evangelischer Theologie, Munich: Oldenburg. Trans. 1937 The Philosophy of Religion from the standpoint of Protestant Theology, London: Ivor Nicholson and Watson.Google Scholar
Brunner, E. (1941). Offenbarung und Vernunft, Zurich: Zwingli. Trans. 1947 Revelation and Reason, London: SCM.Google Scholar
Brunschvicg, Léon (1905). L'idéalisme contemporain (Contemporary idealism), Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Brunschvicg, Léon (1931). De la connaissance de soi (On Self-consciousness), Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Brunschvicg, Léon (1939). La Raison et la religion, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Brush, S. J. (1966). Kinetic Theory, vol. II, Oxford and London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Buber, M. (1923). Ich und Du, in Das dialogische Prinzip, Heidelberg. Trans. 1937 Smith, R., I and Thou, Edinburgh: T. &T. Clark.Google Scholar
Buck-Morss, S. (1977). The Origin of Negative Dialectics: Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt InstituteNew York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. (1945). Some Reflections on Jurisprudence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Budd, M. (1989). Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bullough, Edward (1912 [1957]). Aesthetics: Lectures and Essays, ed. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M., Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1979). ‘Conflicting Appearances’, Proceedings of the British Academy 65: 69–111Google Scholar
Burrow, John W. (1996). Evolution and Society: A Study of Victorian Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ch. 6.Google Scholar
Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (1922). ‘Introduction’ in Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (eds.) (1992), 1–14.Google Scholar
Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (eds.) (1992). The Crisis in Modernism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (1880). Unconscious Memory: A Comparison Between the Theory of Dr. Ewald Hering and the ‘Philosophy of the Unconscious’ of Dr. Edward Von Hartmann; With Translations From these Authors and Preliminary Chapters Bearing on ‘Life and Habit’, ‘Evolution, Old and New’, and Mr. Charles Darwin’s Edition of Dr. Krause’s ‘Erasmus Darwin’, London: David Bogue.Google Scholar
Cacoullos, A. C. (1974). Thomas Hill Green: Philosopher of Rights, New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Cahan, D. (1993). Herman von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth Century Science, Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Caird, E. (1877) A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Kant, Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Caird, E. (1889) The Critical Philosophy of Kant, Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Caird, E. (1893) The Evolution of Religion, Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Caird, J. (1880) Philosophy of Religion, Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Calandra, G. (1987). Gentile e il fascismoRome and Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. (ed.) (1990). Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Calogero, G. (1940–5). Difesa del liberalsocialismo ed altri saggi (A Defence of Liberal Socialism and Other Writings), repr. 1968, ed. Sciavone, M. and Cofrancesco, D., Milan: Marzorati.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. R. (1920). Physics: The Elements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. R. (1921). What is Science?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Candlish, S. (1989) ‘The Truth about F. H. Bradley’, Mind 98: 331–48.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. (1895/97). ‘Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre’, as reprinted in Cantor 1966. Trans. 1915 Jourdain, P. E. B., Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. (1872). ‘Über die Ausdehnung eines Satzes aus der Theorie der trigonometrischen Reihen’ (‘On the Expansion of a Proposition from the Theory of the Trigonometric Series’), Mathematische Annalen 5, 123–32. Repr. in Cantor, 1932, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, G. (1874). ‘Uber eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffs aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen’ (‘On a Property of the Set of All Real Algebraic Numbers’), Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik 77, 258–62. Repr. in Cantor, 1932, 115–18.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. (1878). ‘Ein Beitrag zur Mannigfaltigkeitslehre’ (‘A Contribution to the Theory of Manifolds’), Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik 84, 242–58. Repr. in Cantor, 1932, 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, G. (1883a). ‘Über unendliche lineare Punctmannigfaltigkeiten, 5’ (‘On infinite linear manifolds of points’), Mathematische Annalen 21: 545–91. Repr. in Cantor, 1932, 165–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, G. (1883b). Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Ein mathematisch–philosophischer Versuch in der Lehre des Unendlichen. Leipzig: Commisonsverlag von B. G. Teubner. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W., ‘Foundations of a General Theory of Manifolds: a Mathematico-Philosophical Investigation into the Theory of the Infinite’ in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 878–920.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. (1932). Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts (Collected Memoirs on Mathematical and Philosophical Subjects), ed. Zermelo, E., Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. (1966). Gesammelte Abhandlungen Mathematischen und Philosophischen Inhalts, Hildensheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Cao, T. Yu (1997). Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1922). Der Raum (Space), Berlin: Reuther und Reichard.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1928). Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Weltkreis-Verlag. Trans. 1967 George, R., The Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1928a). Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis. Trans. 1967 George, R., The Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1928b). Scheinproblems in der Philosophy, Berlin: Weltkreis. Trans. 1967 George, R., Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932). ‘Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache’, Erkenntnis 2: 219–41 Trans. 1959 Pap, A., ‘The Elimination of Metaphysics Through the Logical Analysis of Language’ in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), Logical Positivism, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932). ‘Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache’, Erkenntnis 3: 107–42 Trans. 1959 Schick, G., ‘Psychology in Physical Language’, in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York: Free Press, 165–97.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932a). ‘Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft’, Erkenntis, 432–65. Trans. 1934 Black, M., The Unity of Science, London: Kegan Paul. Repr. in part in Hanfling, 1981a, 150–60.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932b). ‘Uberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache’, Erkenntnis, 2, 219–41. Trans. 1959 Pap, A., ‘The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis’ in Ayer, 1959, 60–81.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934). ‘On the Character of Philosophical Problems’, Philosophy of Science 1: 5–19 Repr. 1967 in Rorty, R. (ed.), The Linguistic Turn, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934). Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna: Springer Verlag. Trans. 1937 Smeaton, A., The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934a). ‘On the Character of Philosophical Problems’, Philosophy of Science 1, 5–19. Repr. in Rorty, 1967, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934b). Logische Syntax Der Sprache, Vienna: Springer Verlag. Trans. 1937 Smeaton, Amethe, The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1935). Philosophy and Logical Syntax, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1936–7). ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science 3: 419–71; 4: 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1936). ‘Von Erkenntnistheorie zur Wissenschaftslogik’ (‘From Epistemology to the Logic of Science’), in Actes du Congrès Internationale de Philosophie Scientifique, Sorbonne, Paris, 1935, vol. I, Paris: Hermann and Cie, 36–41.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1938). ‘Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science’ in Neurath, O., Carnap, R., and Morris, Charles (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. I, no. 1, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 42–62. Repr. in Hanfling, 1981a, 112–29.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950). ‘Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1963). ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle, IL: Open Court, 3–84.Google Scholar
Carnap, R., Morris, C., and Neurath, O. (eds.) (1938–70). International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. (1837). ‘On the Voluntary and Instinctive Actions of Living Beings’, Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, 48: 22–44.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. (1874). Principles of Mental Physiology, London: King and Co., 6th edn 1881: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. (1881). Principles of Mental Physiology, 6th edn, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carritt, E. F. (1928). The Theory of Morals, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carritt, E. F. (1935). Morals and Politics, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carritt, E. F. (1947). Ethical and Political Thinking, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. (1887). (pseud. of Charles Dodgson). The Game of Logic, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. (1895). ‘What the Tortoise said to Achilles’, Mind n.s. 4: 278–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, L. (1896). Symbolic Logic, a Fascinating Recreation for the Young, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. (1977). Symbolic Logic, Parts I and II, ed. Bartley, W. W. III, Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar
Cartan, E. (1923). ‘Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée’, Annales de l Ecole Normale Supérieure 40: 325–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Matt (2003). T. H. Green and the Development of Ethical Socialism, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Carter, Robert E. (1997). The Nothingness Beyond God: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Nishida Kitarõ, 2nd edn, St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N., Cat, J., Fleck, B., and Uebel, T. (1995). Between Science and Politics: The Philosophy of Otto Neurath, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N., Fleck, L., Cat, J. and Uebel, T. E. (1996). Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carus, C. G. (1846). Psyche: zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Seele, Pforzheim: Flammer and Hoffmann. Part I trans. 1970 Welch, R., Psyche: On the Development of the Soul, New York: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell (1981). Engels, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cashdollar, Charles D. (1989). The Transformation of Theology, 1830–1890: Positivism and Protestant Thought in Britain and America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caso, Antonio (1943). La existencia como economía, como desinterés y como caridad (Existence as Economy, as Unselfishness and as Charity). Third Edition. México, Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1910). Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff, Berlin: Cassirer. Trans. 1923 Swabey, W. C. and Swabey, M. C., Substance and Function, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1923–9). Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, 3 vols., Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Trans. 1955–7 Manheim, R., The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, 3 vols., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1939). ‘Axel Hägerström. Eine Studie zur schwedischen Philosophie der Gegenwart’ (‘Axel Hägerström. A Study of Contemporary Swedish Philosophy’), Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift, 45: 3–120Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1942). Zur Logik der Kulturwissenschaften: Fünf Studien, in Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift, Band XLVIII, Göteborg: Wettergren and Kerbers, 2–139. Trans. 1961 Howe, C. S., The Logic of the Humanities, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1923–96). Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, Berlin: B. Cassirer, and Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Trans. 1955–7 Manheim, Ralph, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, 4 vols., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1944). An Essay on Man, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. (1979). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cesca, G. (1885). ‘Ueber die Existenz von unbewussten psychischen Zuständen’, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 9: 288–301.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Owen (1975). The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charlton, D. G. (1959). Positivist Thought in France during the Second Empire: 1852–1870, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Child, W. (1996). ‘Solipsism and First Person/Third Person Asymmetries’, European Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 2: 137–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. (1973). ‘The Problem of the Criterion’, The Aquinas Lecture, Marquette University. Repr. 1982 in Chisholm, R., The Foundations of Knowing, Brighton: The Harvester Press, ch. 5.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. (1989). Theory of Knowledge, 3rd edn, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Church, A. (1935). ‘An Unsolvable Problem of Elementary Number Theory’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 41: 332–3Google Scholar
Church, A. (1936a). ‘An Unsolvable Problem of Elementary Number Theory’, American Journal of Mathematics 58: 345–63 Repr. in Davis, 1965, 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, A. (1936b). ‘A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 1: 40–1 and 101–2. Repr. in Davis, 1965, 110–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, A. (1936c). ‘A Bibliography of Symbolic Logic’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 1: 121–216 Additions and corrections 3: 178–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, A. (1941). The Calculi of Lambda Conversion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chwistek, L. (1948). The Limits of Science: Outline of Logic and of the Methodology of the Exact Sciences, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Clark, M. (1990). Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, P. (1976). ‘Atomism versus Thermodynamics’ in Howson, C. (ed.), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, R. W. (1975). The Life of Bertrand Russell, London: Jonathan Cape and Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. (1978). Liberals and Social Democrats, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claudel, P. et al. (1948). Le Mal est parmi nous: un problème actuel, Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Clendenning, J. (1985) The Life and Thought of Josiah Royce, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1876). ‘On the Space-Theory of Matter’, Cambridge Philosophical Society Proceedings 2: 157–8.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1877). ‘The Ethics of Belief’, Contemporary Review, 29: 283–309.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1878). ‘On the nature of things-in-themselves’, Mind n.s. 3, 57–67.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1879). Lectures and Essays, edPollock, s. F. and Stephens, L., 2 vols. Volume I includes a life of Clifford by Pollock, . London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1882). Mathematical Papers, ed. Tucker, R., with an introduction by Smith, H. J. S.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1885). Common Sense of the Exact Sciences, edited and partly written by Pearson, Karl. London: Kegan Paul. Reissued with a preface by Russell, Bertrand and a new introduction by Newman, James R. (New York, 1955).Google Scholar
Coffa, J. A. (1991). The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H. (1870). ‘Zur Controverse zwischen Trendelenburg und Kuno Fischer’ (On the Controversy between Trendelenburg and Kuno Fischer’), Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 7: 249–96.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1871). Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (Kant’s Theory of Experience), Berlin: Dümmler, 2nd edn 1885, 3rd edn 1918.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1877). Kants Begründung der Ethik (Kant’s Foundations of Ethics), Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1889). Kants Begründung der Aesthetik (Kant’s Foundations of Aesthetics), Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1902). Logik der reinen Erkenntnis (Logic of Pure Knowledge), Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1904). Ethik des reinen Willens (Ethics of Pure Will), Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1912). Ästhetik des reinen Gefühls (Aesthetic of Pure Feeling), Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris and Nagel, Ernest (1934). An Introduction to Logic and the Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris (1931). Reason and Nature: An Essay on the Meaning of Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris (1933). Law and the Social Order: Essays in Legal Philosophy, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Cohen, P. J. (1963–4). ‘The Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 50: 1, 143–8, 51: 105–10.Google Scholar
Cohen-Tannoudji, G. and Spiro, M. (1986). La matière-espace-temps, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. A. and Kort, H. (1995). ‘A New Semantics for the Epistemology of Geometry. I: Modeling Spacetime Structure’, Erkenntnis 2, 42: 141–60. (Special Issue on ‘Reflections on Spacetime: Foundations, Philosophy, History’, ed. Majer, U. and Schmidt, H.-J..)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colletti, Lucio (1972). From Rousseau to Lenin, London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1916). Religion and Philosophy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1919). ‘Lectures on the Ontological Argument’, Bodleian Modern Manuscripts, Collingwood deposit 2, Film 12/1.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1924). Speculum Mentis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1925). Outlines of a Philosophy of Art, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1928). Letter to Samuel Alexander July 30, 1928, Alexander Archive, The John Rylands Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1933). ‘Lectures on Ethics’, Bodleian Library Modern Manuscripts, Deposit 8, Film 12/2.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1935). Correspondence with Gilbert, Ryle, letter of 9 May, 1935, Bodleian MS. Eng. Lett. d.194.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938). The Principles of Art, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938a). An Autobiography, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938b). The Principles of Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1940). An Essay on Metaphysics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1942). The New Leviathan, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2nd edn ed. Boucher, David 1998, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The Idea of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. (1924). Speculum Mentis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collini, S. (1976). ‘Hobhouse, Bosanquet and the State: Philosophical Idealism and Political Argument in England 1880–1918’, Past and Present 72: 86–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, S. (1979). Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England 1880–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (1830–42). Cours de philosophie positive, 6 vols., Paris: Bachelier. Trans. 1855 Martineau, H., The Positive Philosophy, New York: Blanchard.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (1830–42). Cours de Philosophie Positive, Paris: Baillière. Trans. (in part) 1853 Martineau, H., The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (1852). Catéchisme Posìtiviste, Paris. Trans. 1858 Congreve, R., The Catechism of Positive Religion, London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste (1830–42). Cours de philosophie positive, 6 vols. Paris: Rouen frères. Trans. And abridged 1853 Martineau, Harriet, The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, 2 vols. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste (1851–4). Système de politique positive, 4 vols. Paris: L. Mathias. Trans. 1875–7 Bridges, J. H. et al., The System of Positive Polity, 4 vols. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste (1852). Catéchisme positiviste, Paris: l'auteur. Trans. 1858 Congreve, Richard, The Catechism of Positive Religion, London: Chapman.Google Scholar
ComteAuguste, (1968–70). Oeuvres, 13 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Coniglione, F., Poli, R., and Woleński, J. (eds.) (1993). Polish Scientific Philosophy: The Lvov-Warsaw School, Amsterdam: Rodoapi.Google Scholar
Cook, G. A. (1993). George Herbert Mead: The Making of a Social Pragmatist, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Copleston, Frederick (1975). A History of Philosophy, vol. IX, New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar
Cornati, D. (1998). L'ontologia implicita nell'Action (1893) di Maurice Blondel, Milan: Glossa.Google Scholar
Cornforth, M. (1933). ‘Is Solipsism Compatible with Common Sense?’, Analysis 1: 21–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutagne, M.–J. (ed.) (1994). L'Action: une dialectique du salut, Actes du colloque du centenaire (Aix-en-Provence, March 1993), Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Craig, E. J. (1998). ‘Solipsism’, in Craig, E. J. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London: Routledge, vol. IX, 25–26.Google Scholar
Crawford, William Rex (1944). A Century of Latin American Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creedy, J. (1986). Edgeworth and the Development of Neoclassical Economics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Croce, B. (1928). ‘Liberismo e liberalismo’ (‘Free Trade and Liberalism’), Atti dell'Accademia di scienze morale e politiche della società reale di Napoli 51, 75–9. Reprinted 1973, Croce, B., Etica e politica, Bari: Laterza, 263–8.Google Scholar
Croce, B. (1943). ‘Revisione filosofica dei concetti di “Liberta” e “Giustizia”’ (‘Philosophical Re-readings of the Concepts of Liberty and Justice’), La Critica 40 (1943), 276–84.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1902). Estetica come scienza dell'espressione e linguistica generale, Milan: Sandron. Trans. 1992 Lyas, C., The Aesthetic as the Science of Expression and of the Linguistic in General, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1913). Guide to Aesthetics, trans. Romanell, Patrick. Indianapolis: Bobbs–Merrill, 1965; repr. cited: Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1920). Nuovi Saggi di Estetica (New Essays on Aesthetics), Bari: Laterza and Figli.Google Scholar
Crocker, S. (1997). ‘The Oscillating Now: Heidegger on the Failure of Bergson’, Philosophy Today 41: 405–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, G. W. (1933) The Idealistic Argument in Recent British and American Philosophy, New York: Century Company.Google Scholar
Czeżowski, T. (1999). Selected Papers, ed. Gumański, L., Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Dalferth, I. U. (1981). Religiose Rede von Gott, Munich: Kaiser.Google Scholar
Dallas, E. (1866). The Gay Science, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F. (1993). The Other HeideggerIthaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Gabriel (1980). Transcendence and Immanence: A Study in Catholic Modernism and Integralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damour, Th. (1995). ‘General Relativity and Experiment’ in Iagolnitzer, D. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Mathematical Physics, Boston: International Press, 37–46.Google Scholar
Dansette, A. (1961). Religious History of Modern France, vol. II, New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1965). Nietzsche as Philosopher, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Danto, A. (1964). ‘The Artworld’, Journal of Philosophy 61, 571–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, K. (1979). ‘The Positivist Repudiation of Wundt’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 15: 205–30.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darnoi, D. (1967). The Unconscious and Eduard von Hartmann: A Historico-Critical Monograph, The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species, London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, London: J. Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. ed. (1965). The Undecidable: Basic Papers on Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Problems, and Computable Functions, Hewlett, NY: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. W. Jr. (1993). ‘The Compactness of First-order Logic: From Gödel to Lindström’, History and Philosophy of Logic 14: 15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J. W. Jr. (1997). Logical Dilemmas: The Life and Work of Kurt Gödel. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters, Ltd.Google Scholar
De Achaval, Hugo M. and Holmes, J. Derek (eds.) (1976). The Theological Papers of John Henry Newman on Faith and Certainty, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
de Chardin, T. (1965). Ecrits du temps de la guerre, Paris: Grasset. Trans. (part only) 1968 Hague, R.Writings in Time of War, London: Collins.Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1931). ‘Sul significato soggettivo della probabilità’ (‘On the Subjective Significance of Probability’), Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. XVII, 298–329.Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1937). ‘La Prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, 7, 1–68. Trans. 1964, ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’ in Kyburg, H. and Smokler, H. (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
De Laguna, G. A. (1916). ‘Sensation and Perception’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 13: 533–47, 617–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Laguna, G. A. (1918). ‘Dualism in Animal Psychology’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 15: 617–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marchi, N. B. (1972). ‘Mill and Cairnes and the Emergence of Marginalism in England’, History of Political Economy 4: 344–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Morgan, A. (1847). Formal Logic, London: Taylor and Walton. Repr. 1926, London: Open Court.Google Scholar
De Morgan, A. (1966). On the Syllogism and other Logical Writings, ed. Heath, P., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Ruggiero, G. (1925). Storia del liberalismo europeo. Bari: Laterza. Trans 1927 Collingwood, R. G., The History of European Liberalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Ruggiero, G. (1946) Il ritorno alla ragione (The Return to Reason), Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Decker, H. (1977). Freud in Germany: Revolution and Reaction in Science, 1893–1907, New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Dedekind, R. (1854). ‘Über die Einführung neuer Funktionen in der Mathematik: Habilitationsvortrag, gehalten im Hause des Prof. Hoeck, in Gegenwart von Hoeck, Gauß, Weber, Waitz, 30 Juni 1854’ in Dedekind, 1932, item LX, 428–38. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W., ‘On the Introduction of New Functions into Mathematics’, in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 754–62.Google Scholar
Dedekind, R. (1872). Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen, Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn. (Latest reprint, 1965.) Repr. in Dedekind, 1932, 315–32. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W., ‘Continuity and Irrational Numbers’, in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 765–79.Google Scholar
Dedekind, R. (1888). Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?, Braunschweig: Vieweg. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W. in Ewald, W. (ed.) From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundation of Mathematics, vol. II, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dedekind, R. (1932). Gesammelte mathematische Werke, Band 3 [Collected Mathematical Works, vol. III], edited by Fricke, R., Noether, E., and Ore, Öystein, Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg and Son.Google Scholar
Deegan, Daniel L. (1966). ‘Wilhelm Herrmann: An Assessment’, Scottish Journal of Theology 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, C. F. (1969). Mind and Nature: A Study of the Naturalistic Philosophies of Cohen, Woodbridge, and Sellars, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Delboeuf, J. (1883a). Eléments de psychophysique générale & spéciale, Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Delboeuf, J. (1883b). Examen critique de la loi psychophysique: sa base et sa signification, Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1966). Le Bergsonisme, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. (1988). Milison, H. T. and Habberjan, B., Bergsonism, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Den Otter, S. M. (1996) British Idealism and Social Explanation: A Study in Late Victorian Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. (1993). ‘On a Newly Arisen Apocalyptic Tone in Philosophy’, trans. Leavey, J. Jr, in Fenves, P. (ed.), Raising the Tone of Philosophy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 117–71.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1954). Meditations on First Philosophy in Anscombe, G. E. M. and Geach, P. T. (eds.), Descartes: Philosophical Writings, London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian. (1997). Huxley: From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. and Tufts, J. H. (1932). Ethics, rev. edn, New York: Holt (Later Works, vol. VII).Google Scholar
Dewey, J., Hook, S., and Nagel, E. (1945). ‘Are Naturalists Materialists?’, Journal of Philosophy 42: 515–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). ‘The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology’, Psychological Review 3: 357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1899–1924). The Middle Works: 1899–1924, 15 vols., ed. Boyston, J. A., Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1976–83).Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1911). ‘Brief Studies in Realism, I’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8: 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1914). ‘Psychological Doctrine and Philosophical Teaching’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 11: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1915). German Philosophy and Politics, New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct, New York: Holt (Middle Works, vol. XIV).Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1925–53). The Later Works: 1925–1953, 17 vols., ed. Boyston, J. A., Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1976–83).Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and Nature, Chicago, IL and London: Open Court.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and its Problems, New York: Henry Holt. Repr. 1984 in Boydston, J. A. (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, vol II, 253–372.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and Nature, Chicago: Open Court. New edn, 1958, New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty, New York: Milton, Balch and Co. (Later Works, vol. IV).Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1935). Liberalism and Social Action, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons. Repr. 1987 in Boydston, J. A. (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, vol. XI, 1–65.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). ‘Unity of Science as a Social Problem’ in Neurath, O., Carnap, R., and Morris, C. W. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. I, no 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 29–38.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York: Henry Holt. Repr. 1988 in Boydston, J. A. (ed.) John Dewey: The Later Works, vol. XII, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1939). ‘The Economic Basis of the New Society’ in Ratner, J., Intelligence in the Modern World, New York: Modern Library, 1939. Repr. 1988 in Boydston, J. A. (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 416–38.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1939). The Theory of Valuation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Later Works, vol. XIII).Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1922). Human Nature and Conduct, New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1925). Experience and Nature, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1927). ‘Half-Hearted Naturalism’, The Journal of Philosophy 24: 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John (1934). Art as Experience, New York: Milton Balch.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1883). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften: Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, Erster Band (1922 Gesammelte Schriften, vol. I), Leipzig and Berlin: B. G. Teubner. Trans. 1989 Neville, M. (ed. Makkreel, R. and Rodi, F.) Introduction to the Human Sciences (Selected Works, vol. I), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1883). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, Leipzig. Trans. 1989 Betanzons, J. R.Introduction to the Human Sciences: An Attempt to Lay the Foundation for the Study of Society and History, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1894). ‘Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie’ in 1924 Die Geistige Welt (Gesammelte Schriften, vol. V), Leipzig and Berlin: B. G. Teubner. Trans. 1977 Zaner, R. M., ‘Ideas Concerning and Descriptive and Analytic Psychology’ in Dilthey, , Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1910). ‘Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften’ (‘The Construction of the Historical World in the Human Sciences’) in Dilthey, 1927.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1927). Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften (The Construction of the Historical World in the Human Sciences) (Selected Works, vol. VII), Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1985). ‘Poetry and Experience’, Selected Works, vol. V, ed. Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Rodi, Frithjof, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dilworth, David A. and Viglielmo, Valdo H. with Zavala, , Jacinto, Agustin (1998). Sourcebook for Modern Japanese Philosophy: Selected Documents, London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Dimova-Cookson, Maria (2001). T. H. Green’s Moral and Political Philosophy: A Phenomenological Perspective, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doering, B. E. (1983). J. Maritain and the French Catholic Intellectuals, Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Durant et al. (1920). Essays in Critical Realism: A Cooperative Study of the Problem of Knowledge, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dray, William (1998). History as Reenactment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dreben, B. and Goldfarb, W. D. (1979). The Decision Problem: Solvable Classes of Quantificational Formulas, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1995). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (ed.) (1982). Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science, Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert (1991). Being-in-the-World, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Driesch, H. (1905). Der Vitalismus als Geshichte und als Lehre, Leipzig. Trans. 1914 Ogden, C. K., The History and Theory of Vitalism, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesch, H. (1908). The Science and Philosophy of the Organism, London: Adams, and Black, Charles. Trans. 1909 Philosophie des Organischen, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Drobisch, M. (1836). Neue Darstellung der Logik, Leipzig: Voss.Google Scholar
Du Bos, C. (1946–61). Journal: 1921–1939, Paris: Corréa/Editions du Vieux Colombier.Google Scholar
Ducasse, C. J. (1942). ‘Moore’s Refutation from idealism’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 223–52.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1905–6). Les origines de la statique. Les sources des théories physiques, 2 vols., Paris: Hermann, A.. Trans. 1991 LeneauxVagliente, G. H. V. N., and Wagener, G. H., The Origins of Statics: the sources of physical theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1906). La théorie physique. Son objet et sa structure, Paris: Chevalier and Rivière. Trans. 1954 Wiener, P., The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1911). Traité d'Energétique ou de Thermodynamique Générale (Treatise on Energetics or General Thermodynamics), Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1913–59). Le système du monde. Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic (The System of the World: A History of Cosmological Doctrines from Plato to Copernicus), 10 vols. Paris: A. Hermann.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1913). Le Système du Monde (The World System), Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Duméry, Henri (1948). La Philosophie de l'action: Essai sur l'intellectualisme blondélien (The Philosophy of Action: An Essay on Blondelian Intellectualism), Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E. (1981). The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E. (1988 and 1994). Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. English version: Origins of Analytical Philosophy, London: Duckworth, 1993; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E. (1991). Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1977). Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1988). Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. English version: The Origins of Analytic Philosophy, London: Duckworth, 1993; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1991). Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Duncan, David (1908). Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer, 2 vols., London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Dunn, R. (1858). ‘On Mental Physiology: or, the Correlations of Physiology and Psychology’, Journal of Mental Science 4: 343–60.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1895). Les règles de la méthode sociologique, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1938 Solovay, Sarah A. and Mueller, John H., The Rules of Sociological Method, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1897). Le Suicide: étude de sociologie, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1951 Spaulding, J. A. and Simpson, G., Suicide: A Study in Sociology, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1912). Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1915 Swain, J. W., The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1915 Swain, J. W., The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dussen, W. J. (1981). History as a Science: The Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry (1991). Ideology, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1995). Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J., Glymour, C., and Stachel, J. (eds.) (1977). Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Ueber das Gedachtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie, Leipzig: Duncker & Humboldt. Trans. 1913 Ruger, H. A. and Bussenius, C. E., Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1920). Space, Time and Gravitation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1928). The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1929). Science and the Unseen World, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1930). ‘On the Instability of the Einstein World’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 90: 668–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1939). The Philosophy of the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. (1924). The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences, London: Kegan Paul. Reprint edn 1965, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1925). Papers Relating to Political Economy, 3 vols., New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. (1955). The Logic of Moral Discourse, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ehlers, J. (1973). ‘The Nature and Structure of Spacetime’ in Mehra, J. (ed.), The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, Dordrecht: Reidel, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfels, C. von. (1890). ‘Über Gestaltqualitäten’ (‘On “Gestalt qualities”’), Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 14: 249–92.Google Scholar
Ehrenfels, C. von. (1897). System der Wertheorie (A System of a Theory of Values), vol. I, Leipzig. Repr. 1982 in Ehrenfels, C. (Fabian, R., ed.), Werttheorie, Philosophische Schriften, vol. I, Munich: Philosophia, 201–405.Google Scholar
Einaudi, L. (1928). ‘Di concetti di liberismo economico, e di borghesia e sulle origini materialistiche della guerra’, La riforma sociale, 35, vol. 39, nos. 9–10 September–October, 501–16. Repr. 1973 in Einaudi, L., Il buongoverno, Bari: Laterza, vol. I, 196–218.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. and Infeld, L. (1938). The Evolution of Physics, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1905). ‘Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper’, Annalen der Physik 17: 891–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1916). ‘Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 4, 49: 769–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1916). Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Leipzig: J. Barth; trans. 1923 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B.The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity’, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H., The Principle of Relativity; repr. New York: Dover, 1952, 111–64.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1917). ‘Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Sitzungsberichte der Preuβ;ischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Math.-Phys. Kl.; trans. 1952 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B., ‘Cosmological Considerations on the General Theory of Relativity’, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H., The Principle of Relativity, 1923; repr. New York: Dover, 1952, 175–88.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1918). ‘Prinzipielles zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 55: 241–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1921). ‘Geometrie und Erfahrung’, Sitzungsberichte der Preuflischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Math.-Phys. Kl.; separately issued in expanded form and trans. 1923 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B., ‘Geometry and Experience’ in Sidelights on Relativity, New York: E. P. Dutton, 27–56.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1949). ‘Autobiographical Notes’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1–95.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1952). ‘Relativity and the Problem of Space’, Appendix V, 135–57, in Einstein, A., Relativity: The Special and General Theory, 15th edn, New York: Crown Publishers, 1961.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1956). The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1964) Knowledge and Experience in the Philosophy of F. H. Bradley, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, H. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, H. (1993). Beyond the Unconscious: Essays of Henri Ellenberger in the History of Psychiatry, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. F. R. and Williams, R. M. (1988). Flat and Curved Space-Times, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, W. D. (ed.) (1938). A Sourcebook of Gestalt Psychology, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmet, D. (1936). Philosophy and Faith, London: SCM.Google Scholar
Emmet, D. (1945). The Nature of Metaphysical Thinking, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Enderton, H. B. (1998). ‘Alonzo Church and the Reviews’, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4: 181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, P. (1967). Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein with a Memoir, trans. Furtmüller, L., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1884). Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staat, Zurich: Hottingen. Trans. 1968 The Origins of the Family, Private Property, and the State in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Selected Works, London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1884). Der Ursprung der Familie, Zurich: Verlag der Schweizerischen Volksbuchhandlung. Trans. 1968 The Origins of the Family in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Collected Works, London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Erdmann, B. (1878). ‘Die Gliederung der Wissenschaften’ (‘The Division of the Sciences’), Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie (Quarterly for Scientific Philosophy) 2: 72–105Google Scholar
Erdmann, B. (1892). Logik, Halle.Google Scholar
Espinasse, Francis (1895). The Life of Ernest Renan, London: W. Scott. Repr. 1980 Boston.Google Scholar
Evans Pritchard, E. E. (1964). Social Anthropology and Other Essays, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1984). ‘The Origins of American Academic Psychology’ in Brozek, J. (ed.), Explorations in the History of Psychology in the United States, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 17–60.Google Scholar
Ewald, W. (ed.) (1996). From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, vols. I and II, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1929). The Morality of Punishment, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1933). Idealism: A Critical Survey, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1947). The Definition of Good, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1953). Ethics, London: English Universities Press, Teach Yourself Books.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1957). The Idealist Tradition from Berkeley to Blanshard, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1959). Second Thoughts in Moral Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Exner, F. (1919). Vorlesungen über die physikalischen Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaften (Introduction to the Physical Foundations of the Natural Sciences), Vienna: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
Factor, R. and Turner, S. (1984). Max Weber and the Dispute Over Reason and Value, London: Routledge, 1984.Google Scholar
Farrer, A. M. (1943). Finite and Infinite, London: Dacre.Google Scholar
Fateev, V. A. (ed.) (1995) V. V. Rozanov: Pro et Contra, St Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Favraux, P. (1987). Une philosophie du Médiateur: Maurice Blondel, Paris–Naumur: Lethielleux.Google Scholar
Fecher, Ch. A. (1953). The philosophy of J. Maritain, Westminster: Newman Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik, Leipzig: Breitkopf and Hartel. Vol. I trans. 1966 Adler, H., ed. Howes, D. and Boring, E., Elements of Psychophysics, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1882). Revision der Hauptpunkte der Psychophysik, Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik, 2 vols., Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel. Vol. I trans. 1966 Adler, H. E., ed. Howes, D. and Boring, E., Elements of Psychophysics, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1934). ‘The Logical Character of the Principle of Induction’, Philosophy of Science 1: 20–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigl, H. (1945). ‘Operationism and Scientific Method’, Psychological Review 52: 250–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigl, H. (1951). ‘Principles and Problems of Theory Construction in Psychology’, in Dennis, W., Leeper, R., Harlow, H. F., Gibson, J. J., Krech, D., Rioch, D. M., McCulloch, W. S., and Feigl, H., Current Trends in Psychological Theory, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 179–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. (1995). ‘Life’, ‘Vitalism’ in Kim, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.), A Companion to Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell, 272–4, 508–9.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. I, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Femia, J. (1981). Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness and the Revolutionary ProcessOxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. (1998). The Pity of War, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ferrater Mora, J. (1957). Ortega y Gasset: an Outline of his philosophy, Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes and New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrater Mora, J. (1962). Unamuno, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. Jaime (1990). Doubt and Religious Commitment: The Role of the Will in Newman’s Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ferry, L. and Renaut, A. (1988). Heidegger et les modernes, Paris: Grasset Trans 1990 Philip, F., Heidegger and Modernity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferster, C. B. and Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of Reinforcement, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fessard, G. (1936). Pax Nostra, Paris, GrassetGoogle Scholar
Fessard, G. (1956). La Dialectique des exercises spirituels de Saint Ignace de Loyola, Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Fessard, G. (1990). Hegel, le christianisme et l'histoire, ed. Sales, M., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Fessard, G. (1997). Le mystère de la Société: recherches sur le sens de l'histoire, ed. Sales, M. (S. J.), Namur: Culture et Vérité.Google Scholar
Festenstein, M. (1997). Pragmatism and Political Theory, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Feynman, R. (1967). The Character of Physical Laws, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1963). Meinong’s Theory of Objects and Values, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fisch, M. (1986). Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max Fisch,. Edited by Ketner, K. L. and Kloesel, C. J. W.. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (1860a). Kants Leben und die Grundlagen seiner Lehre (Kant’s Life and the Foundations of his Teaching), Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (1860b). Geschichte der neuern Philosophie (History of Modern Philosophy), Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (1865). System der Logik und Metaphysik oder Wissenschaftslehre (System of Logic and Metaphysics or the Doctrine of Science), 2nd edn, Heidelberg: Verlagsbuchhandlung von Friedrich Bassermann.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (1870). Anti-Trendelenburg, Jena: Hermann Dabis.Google Scholar
Fischer-Appelt, Peter (1965). Metaphysik im Horizont der Theologie Wilhelm Herrmann (Metaphysics in the Horizon of Wilhelm Herrmann’s Theology), Munich: Kaiser Verlag.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1892 [1925]). Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Simon (1988). Revelatory Positivism? Barth’s Earliest Theology and the Marburg School, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flewelling, R. T. (1926). Creative Personality, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flewelling, R. T. (1935). Letter of March 5, 1934 to Norbert Oldgeering, Catholic University of America, University of Southern California, Flewelling Archive.Google Scholar
Flewelling, R. T. (1952). The Person or the Significance of Man, Los Angeles: Ward Ritchie Press.Google Scholar
Flower, Elizabeth and Murphy, Murray (1977). A History of Philosophy in America, 2 vols., New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Fock, V. (1959). The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. J. (1976). Wittgenstein, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, M. (1982). William James’s Philosophy: A New Perspective, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. (1953). Social Anthropology at Cambridge since 1900: An Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses: une archéologie des sciences humaines, Paris: Gallimard. Trans. 1974, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Frank, S. L. (1950) ‘Introduction’ to Soloviev 1950, 9–31.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (1983). ‘Mathematical Methods in Economics’, American Mathematical Monthly 90: 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (1890). The Golden Bough, London: Macmillan; 3rd edn 1907–15, 12 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (1978). The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (1986). Liberalism Divided: A Study in British Political Thought 1914–39, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, M. (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Halle: L. Nebert. Trans. 1972 Bynum, T. W., Conceptual Notation and Other Articles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, Halle. Trans. Bauer-Mengelberg, S. in Heijenoort, J. (ed.), From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1884). Grundlagen der Arithmetik, eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Breslau: W. Koebner. Trans. with German text 1953 Austin, J. L., The Foundations of Arithmetic, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1892). ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50. Trans. 1984 Black, M., ‘On Sense and Meaning’, in Frege, G. (ed. McGuinness, B.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 157–77.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1893). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (vol. I), Jena: H. Pohle. Partial trans. Furth, M. 1964, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (vol. II), Jena: H. Pohle. Partial trans. Furth, M. 1964, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1918). ‘Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung’, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 58–77. Trans. 1984 Geach, P. and Stoothoff, R., ‘Thoughts’, in Frege, G. (ed. McGuinness, B.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 351–72.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1976). Nachgelassene Schriften: Zweiter Band, Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, ed. Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., and Kaulbach, F., Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Partially translated as Frege, 1980.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Partial trans. by Kaal, H. of Frege, 1976.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1984). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy, ed. McGuiness, B., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1954). The Origins of Psycho-Analysis: Letters to Wilhelm Fließ, Drafts and Notes 1887–1902, ed. Bonaparte, M., Freud, A., and Kris, E., trans. Mosbacher, E. and Strachey, J., London: Imago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1900). Die Traumdeutung, vols. II–III of Gesammelte Werke, 18 vols., Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag, 1960. Trans. The Interpretation of Dreams, vols. IV–V of The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 24 vols., under the general editorship of Strachey, J., in collaboration with Freud, A., assisted by Strachey, A. and Tyson, A., London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1953–74.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1904). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens, Gesammelte Werke, vol. IV, The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, standard edition, vol. VI.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1905). Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie, Gesammelte Werke, vol. V, 29–145. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, Standard Edition, vol. VII, 123–245.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1912). ‘Einige Bemerkungen über den Begriff des Unbewußten in der Psychoanalyse’, Gesammelte Werke, vol. VIII, 430–9. Trans. ‘A note on the unconsciousin psycho-analysis’, Standard Edition, vol. XII, 255–66.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1915). ‘Das Unbewußte’, Gesammelte Werke, vol. X, 264–303 Trans. ‘The nconscious’, Standard Edition, vol. XVI, 159–215.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1920). Jenseits des Lustprinzips, Gesammelte Werke, vol. XIII, 3–69. Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Standard Edition, vol. XVIII, 1–64.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1923). Das Ich und das Es, Gesammelte Werke, vol. XIII, 237–89. The Ego and the Id, Standard Edition, vol. XIX, 1–66.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1933). Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse, Gesammelte Werke, vol. XV. Trans. New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Standard Edition, vol. XXII, pp. 1–182.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1940). Abriß der Psychoanalyse, Gesammelte Werke, vol. XVII, 63–138. Trans. An Outline of Psycho-Analysis, Standard Edition, vol. XXIII, 139–207.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, H. (1957). ‘Zur Geschichte der Grundlagen der Geometrie: zugleich eine Besprechung der 8. Auflage von Hilberts Grundlagen der Geometrie [On the History of the Foundations of Geometry, at the same time a review of the 8th Edition of Hilbert’s Foundations of Geometry]’, Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde 5: 105–42.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and the Philosophy of Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1987). ‘Carnap’s Aufbau Reconsidered’, Noûs 21: 521–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1992). ‘Epistemology in the Aufbau’, Synthèse 93: 15–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, J. F. (1807, 1828–31). Neue oder anthropologische Kritik der Vernunft, Heidelberg: Bey Mohr and Zimmer.Google Scholar
Frings, M. S. (ed.) (1974). Max Scheler (1874–1928) Centennial Essays, The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, Roger (1920). Vision and Design, London: Chatto and Windus; reprint cited: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Fry, Roger (1996). A Roger Fry Reader, ed. by Reed, Christopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fuss, P. (1965) The Moral Philosophy of Josiah Royce, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode (Gesammelte Werke vol. I), Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. 1989 Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G., Truth and Method, New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Gale, George (1984). ‘Science and the Philosophers’, Nature 312: 491–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, P. (1990). ‘Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism’, Critical Inquiry 16: 709–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, P. (1996). ‘Constructing Modernism: The Cultural Location of Aufbau’ in Giere, and Richardson, (1996), 17–44.Google Scholar
Galton, F. Sir (1883). Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandy, R. (1988). ‘The Confluence of Ideas’ in Herken, R. (ed.), The Universal Turing Machine, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55–111.Google Scholar
Ganivet, A. (1897). Idearium español, Granada. Trans. Spain. An Interpretation, London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1946.Google Scholar
García Bacca, D. (1934). Introducció a la logística amb applications a la filosofia i a les matemàtiques (Introduction to the Logistic with Applications to the Philosophy and the Mathematics), Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Gardner, S. (1999). ‘Schopenhauer, Will and Unconscious’ in Janaway, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. F. (1983). The Modern Liberal Theory of Man, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. F. (1994). ‘Green, Bosanquet and the Philosophy of Coherence’ in Ten, C. L. (ed.), The Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. VII: The Nineteenth Century, London: Routledge, 408–36.Google Scholar
Gay, P. (1988). Freud: A Life for Our Time, London: Dent.Google Scholar
Gentile, G. (1915). Teoria generale dello spirito come atto puro, Bari: Laterza. Trans. 1922 Carr, H. W., The Theory of Mind as Pure ActLondon: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gentile, G. (1927). ‘The Philosophic Basis of Fascism’, Foreign Affairs 6: 290–304.Google Scholar
Gentile, G. (1937). Fondamenti della filosofia del diritto, 3rd edn, Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Gentile, Giovanni (1920). Teoria Generale Dello Spirito come Atto Puro, third edition, Bari: Laterza and Figli, 1920. Trans. 1922 Carr, H. Wildon, The Theory of Mind as Pure Act, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gentzen, G. (1936). ‘Die Widerspruchsfreiheit der reinen Zahlentheorie’, Mathematische Annalen 112: 493–565 Trans. 1969 Szabo, M. E., ‘The Consistency of Pure Number Theory’ in Gentzen, G. (ed. Szabo, M. E.), The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 68–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geroch, R. P. and Horowitz, G. T. (1979). ‘Global structures of spacetimes’ in Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W. (eds.), General Relativity. An Einstein Centenary Survey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 212–93.Google Scholar
Gestrich, Christoff (1977). Neuzeitliches Denken und die Spaltung der dialektischen Theologie, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Gettier, E. L. (1963). ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 23: 121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, R. N. and Richardson, A. W. (1996). Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1863–1913). Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht (The German Law of Associations), 4 vols., Berlin: Weidmann. Trans. 1990 Fischer, M., Community in Historical Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (selections from vol. I). Trans. 1900 Maitland, F. W., Political Theories of the Middle Ages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (a selection from vol. III). Trans. 1977 Heiman, G., Associations and the Law. The Classical and Early Christian Stages, Toronto: University of Toronto Press (another selection from vol. III). Trans. 1934 Barker, E., Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500 to 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (a selection from vol. IV).Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1874). ‘Die Grundbegriffe des Staatsrechts und die neueren Staatsrechtstheorien’ (‘The Fundamental Concepts of State Law and the Newer Theories of State Law’), Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 30: 153–98, 265–335. Repr. 1915 as a book, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1880). Johannes Althusius und die Entwicklung der naturrechtlichen Staatstheorien (Johannes Althusius and the Development of Natural Law Theories of the State), Breslau: M. and N. Marcus. Trans. 1939 Freyd, B., The Development of Political Theory, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1883a). Naturrecht und Deutsches Recht (Natural Law and German Law), Frankfurt: Rütter and Loening.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1883b). ‘Labands Staatsrecht und die deutsche Rechtswissenschaft’ (‘Laband’s Theory of State Law, and German Legal Science’), Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche, 7: 1097–195.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1887). Die Genossenschaftstheorie und die deutsche Rechtsprechung (The Theory of Associations, and Adjudication in Germany), Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1902). Das Wesen der menschlichen Verbände (The Nature of Human Associations), Berlin: Gustav Schade.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1916–17). ‘Recht und Sittlichkeit’ (‘The Law and Morality’), Logos, 6: 211–64Google Scholar
Gilley, Sheridan (1990). Newman and His Age, London: Darton, Longmans, and Todd.Google Scholar
Gilson, E. and Maritain, J. (1991). Deux approches de l'être. Correspondence 1923–71, Etienne Gilson, Jacques Maritain, ed. Prouvost, G., Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Glendinning, S. (1998). On Being With Others, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gluck, M. (1985). Georg Lukács and His Generation 1900–1918Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1929). ‘Über die Vollstandigkeit des Logikkalküls’, doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna. Trans. 1986 Bauer-Mengelberg, S. and Heijenoort, J., ‘On the completeness of the Calculus of Logic’ in Gödel, K., Collected Works, ed. Feferman, S. et al., vol. I, New York: Oxford University Press, 60–101.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1930). ‘Die Vollständigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktionenkalküls’, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 37: 349–60 Repr. in Gödel, 1986, 102–22. Trans. Mengelberg, S. Bauer, ‘The Completeness of the Axioms of the Functional Calculus of Logic’, in Gödel, 1986, 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, K. (1931). ‘Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I’, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38: 173. Repr. in Gödel, 1986, 144–94. Trans. Heijenoort, J., ‘On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems, I’ in Gödel, 1986, 145–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, K. (1932). ‘Zum intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkül’, Anzeigen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 69: 65–6 Trans. 1986 Dawson, J., ‘On the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus’ in Gödel, K., Collected Works, ed. Feferman, S. et al., vol. I, New York: Oxford University Press, 222–5.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1933). ‘Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls’, Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4: 39–40 Trans. 1986 Dawson, J., ‘An Interpretation of the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus’, in Gödel, K., Collected Works, ed. Feferman, S. et al., vol. I, New York: Oxford University Press, 300–3.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1934). ‘On Undecidable Propositions of Formal Mathematical Systems’, mimeographed notes by Kleene, S. C. and Rosser, J. B.. Repr. in Gödel, 1986, 346–71.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1938). ‘Vortrag bei Zilsel’, shorthand lecture draft. Transcribed Dawson, C., in Gödel, 1995, 86–112. Trans. Parsons, C., ‘Lecture at Zilsel’s’ in Gödel, 1995, 87–113.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1940). The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis with the Axioms of Set Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Reprinted in Gödel, 1990, 33–101.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1941). ‘In What Sense is Intuitionistic Logic Constructive?’, manuscript lecture notes, first published in Gödel, 1995, 189–200.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1944). ‘Russell’s Mathematical Logic’ in Schillp, P. (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston, IL: Open Court, 1944, 125–53. Reprinted in Gödel, 1990, 119–41.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1949). ‘An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations of Gravitation’, Reviews of Modern Physics 21: 447–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, K. (1986). Collected Works, vol. I: Publications 1929–1936, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1990). Collected Works, vol. II: Publications 1938–1974, ed. Feferman, S. et al., New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1990). Collected Works, vol. II, ed. Feferman, S., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1995). Collected Works, vol. III: Unpublished Essays and Lectures, ed. Feferman, S. et al., New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. D. (1979). ‘Logic in the Twenties: The Nature of the Quantifier’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 44: 351–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, W. (1988). ‘Poincaré Against the Logicists’ in Aspray, W. and Kitcher, P. (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 11, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 61–81.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. (1989). ‘Russell’s Reasons for Ramification’ in Savage, C. W. and Anderson, C. A. (eds.), Rereading Russell. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 12, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 24–40.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, Rhiannon (1991). La Nausée(Unwin Critical Library), London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1968). The Languages of Art, Indianapolis, IN: Hackettt.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. S. (1973). ‘Alfred Marshall and the Development of Economics as a Science’ in Giere, R. N. and Westfall, R. S. (eds.), Foundations of Scientific Method: The Nineteenth Century, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfried, P. E. (1990). Carl Schmitt: Politics and TheoryNew York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gouhier, H. (1964). Bergson et le Christ des Evangiles, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1965). La vie d' Auguste Comte (The Life of Auguste Comte), 2nd rev. edn, Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouinlock, J. (1972). John Dewey’s Philosophy of Value, New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Gracia Guillén, D. (1986). Voluntad de verdad (The Will to Truth), Barcelona: Labor.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1948–51). Quaderni del carcere, ed. Platone, F., 6 vols., Turin: Einaudi. Rev. complete edn 1975 ed. Gerratana, V., Turin: Einaudi. Trans. 1971 (incomplet) Hoare, Q. and Smith, G., Selections from the Prison NotebooksLondon: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1982). La città futura, ed. Caprioglio, S., Turin: Einaudi. Trans. 1994 Cox, V., Preprison WritingsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grappengiesser, C. (1870). Kants Lehre von Raum und Zeit (Kant’s Doctrine of Space and Time), Jena: Friedrich Mauke.Google Scholar
Grassmann, R. (1895). Formelbuch der Formenlehre oder Mathematik, Stettin.Google Scholar
Graves, J. C. (1971). The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. J. (1998). ‘The Foundations of Geometry and the History of Geometry’, Mathematical Intelligencer 20, 54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T. H. (1868) ‘Popular Philosophy in Relation to Life’, North British Review, 45, 133–62. Repr. in Green (1885–9), vol. III, 92–125.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1874) ‘General Introduction to Vol. I’ and ‘Introduction to Moral Part of the Treatise’ in Hume, D., Treatise of Human Nature (ed. Green, T. H. and Grose, T. H.), London. Repr. in Green (1885–9), vol. I, 1–371.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1880) ‘Review of J. Caird: Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion’, Academy 18: 28–30. Repr. in Green 1885–9, vol. III, 138–46.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1881) Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract: A Lecture, Oxford and London: Slatter and Rose; Simpkin, Marshall. Repr. 1986 in Harris, P. and Morrow, J. (eds.), T. H. Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 194–212.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1883). Prolegomena to Ethics, ed. by Bradley, A. C., Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T. H. (1883a). Prolegomena to Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 5th edn 1907, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1883b [1888]). Witness of God and Faith: Two Lay Sermons (ed. Toynbee, A.), London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1885–8). Works of Thomas Hill Green, 3 vols., ed. Nettleship, R. L., London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1886) Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation in Nettleship, R. L. (ed.), The Works of Thomas Hill Green, vol. II (1888), London: Longmans, Green. Repr. 1986 in Harris, P. and Morrow, J. (eds.), Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1997). Additional Writings, ed. Nicholson, P. P., Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Green, T.H. (1883). Prolegomena to Ethics by the Late Thomas Hill Green, ed. Bradley, A. C., Oxford: Clarendon Press. New edn 2003, Brink, D. (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greengarten, I. M. (1981) Thomas Hill Green and the Development of Liberal-Democratic Thought, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, W. H. (1983). The British Political Tradition, 2 vols., London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Gregory, Frederick (1992). Nature Lost? Natural Science and the German Theological Traditions in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1964). Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grossmann, R. (1974). Meinong, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grote, John (1870). An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy, Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1973). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd, enlarged edn. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guignon, C. (ed.) (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guitton, Jean (1939). Le Problème de la connaissance et la pensée religieuse, Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, G. (1922–3). ‘Otto v. Gierke als Rechtsphilosoph’ (‘Otto v. Gierke as Legal Philosopher’), Logos, 11: 86–132Google Scholar
Guttman, Julius (1964). Philosophies of Judaism: The History of Jewish Philosophy from Biblical Times to Franz Rosenzweig, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guy, A. (1983). Histoire de la philosophie espagnole (History of Spanish Philosophy), Toulouse: Publications de l'Université.Google Scholar
Guy, Alain (1989). Panorama de la philosophie ibéro-americaine. Du XVIe siècle a nos jours (Overview of Ibero-American Philosophy. From XVI Century to the Present), Génova: Patiño.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1993). Kant and the Experience of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1996). ‘Pleasure and Knowledge in Schopenhauer’s Aesthetics’ in , Jacquette (1996), 109–32.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan (1993). Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1967). ‘Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften’, Philosophisches Rundschau 5. Trans. 1988 Nicholson, S. and Stark, J., On the Logic of The Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1968). Erkenntnis und Interesse, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1971 Shapiro, J., Knowledge and Human Interest, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Rev. edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. (1990). Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind, vol. III, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. H. P. A. (1874). Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen, Leipzig: W. Engelmann. Trans. 1905 McCabe, J., The Evolution of Man, London: Watts.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. H. P. A. (1899). Die Weltrathsel, Bonn: Strauss. Trans. 1900 McCabe, J., The Riddle of the Universe, London: Watts.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich (1868). Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte, Berlin: G. Reimer. Trans. 1876 Lankester, E. R., The History of Creation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich (1899). Die Welträtsel, Bonn: E. Strauss. Trans. 1929 McCabe, Joseph, The Riddle of the Universe, London: Watts.Google Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1902). Kants Ethik im Verhältnis zu seinem erkenntnistheoretischen Grundgedanken (Kant'ps Ethics in Relation to his Fundamental Ideas in the Theory of Knowledge), Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1908). Das Prinzip der Wissenschaft, I. Die Realität (The Principle of Science, vol. I: Reality), Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1910). ‘Kritiska punkter i värdepsykologien’ (‘Critical Points in the Psychology of Valuation’) in Festskrift tillägnad E.O. Burman på hans 65–årsdag den 7 oktober 1910, Uppsala: Akademiska bokhandeln, 17–75.Google Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1911). ‘Om Moraliska Föreställningars Sanning’. Trans. 1964 Sandin, R. T., Philosophy and Religion, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1927). Der römische Obligationsbegriff im Lichte der allgemeinen römischen Rechtsanschauung (The Roman Concept of Obligation in Light of the General Roman View of the Law), vol. I, Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1929). ‘Axel Hägerstr öm’ in Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen (Contemporary Philosophy in Self-Portrayals), ed. Schmidt, R., vol. VII, Leipzig: Felix Meiner, 111–59. Trans. 1964 Sandin, R. T., ‘A Summary of My Philosophy’ in Hägerström, A., Philosophy and Religion, London: George Allen and Unwin, 31–74.Google Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1935). ‘Begreppet viljeförklaring på privaträttens område’, Theoria, 1: 32–57, 121–38. Trans. 1953 Broad, C. D., ‘The Conception of a Declaration of Intention in the Sphere of Private Law’ in Hägerström, A., Inquiries into the Nature of Law and Morals, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 299–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägerström, A. (1938). Inquiries into the Nature of Laws and Morals, trans. Broad, C. D., Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. S. (1923). Mechanism, Life, and Personality, New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Haldane, R. B. (Viscount) (1921). The Reign of Relativity, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Haller, R. and Stadler, F. (1993). Wien-Berlin-Prag: Der Aufstieg der wissenschaftlichen Philosophie (Vienna-Berlin-Prague: The Rise of Scientific Philosophy), Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Haller, R. (1974). ‘Über dieMöglichkeit der Erkenntnistheorie’ (‘On the Possibility of a Theory of Knowledge’) in Schroeder, P. (ed.), Vernunft Erkenntnis Sittlichkeit (Reason, Knowledge, Ethics), Hamburg: Felix Meiner V. 37–54.Google Scholar
Haller, R. (1982). Schlick und Neurath. Ein Symposion (Schlick and Neurath: A Symposium), Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hallett, M. (1984). Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. Sir (1865–6). Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, 4 vols., ed. Mansel, H. L. and Veitch, J., Edinburgh: William Blackwood.Google Scholar
Hampe, M. and Maasen, H. (1991). Prozess, Gefuhl und Raum-Zeit: Materialien zu Whiteheads Prozess und Realität, Die Gifford Lectures und ihre Deutung: Materialien zu Whiteheads ‘Prozess und Realität', 2 vols., Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hanfling, O. (1981a) Logical Positivism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hanfling, O. (ed.) (1981b). Essential Readings in Logical Positivism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hanna, T. (ed.) (1962). The Bergsonian Heritage, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harrell, W. and Harrison, R. (1938). ‘Rise and Fall of Behaviorism’, Journal of General Psychology 18: 367–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, A. (1996). Reenchanted science: Holism in German culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, F. P. (1944). The Neo-Idealist Political Theory: Its Continuity with the British Tradition, New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1977). William Beveridge: A Biography, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1997). Creation in Time: Philosophy, Theology and the Event in the Later Heidegger, St. John’s, Newfoundland: privately published.Google Scholar
Harrison, Charles, Wood, Paul, and Gaiger, Jason (1998). Art in Theory 1815–1900: An Anthology of Changing Ideas, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrison, Charles and Wood, Paul (eds.) (1992). Art in Theory 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Review of Hägerström, A., Inquiries into the Nature of Law and Morals (1953), Philosophy, 30: 369–73Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1957–8). ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629. Repr. 1983 in Hart, H. L. A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1982). Essays on Bentham, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. von (1869). Philosophie des Unbewußten: Versuch einer Weltanschauung. Speculative Resultate nach inductiv-naturwissenschaftlicher Methode, Berlin: C. Duncker. Trans. 1931 Coupland, W., Philosophy of the Unconscious: Speculative Results According to the Inductive Method of Physical Science, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. von (1879). Phänomenologie des sittlichen Betwußtseins: Prolegomena zu jeder künftiger Ethik, Berlin: C. Duncker.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. von (1887). Philosophie des Schönen: zweiter systematischer Theil der Aesthetik, Leipzig: W. Friedrich.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. von (1896). Kategorienlehre, Leipzig: H. Haacke.Google Scholar
Hartmann, E. von (1899–1900). Geschichte der Metaphysik, 2 vols., Leipzig: H. Haacke.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, C. (1941). Man’s Vision of God, and the Logic of Theism, New York.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, C. (1948). The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. (1990). The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. (1997). ‘Wundt and Psychology as Science: Disciplinary Transformations’, Perspectives on Science 5: 349–82.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, T. (1970). Lebesgue’s Theory of Integration, New York: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1935) (ed.). Collectivist Economic Planning, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayman, R. (1980). Nietzsche: A Critical Life, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hayman, Ronald (1980). Nietzsche: A Critical Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, L. S. (1964). A Short History of British Psychology, 1840–1940, London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
Heck, P. (1932). Begriffsbildung und Interessenjurisprudenz, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. 1948 Schoch, M. M., ‘The Formation of Concepts and the Jurisprudence of Interests’ in The Jurisprudence of Interests, ed. Schoch, M. M., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 99–256.Google Scholar
Heck, R. ed. (1997). Language, Thought and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1802). On the Relationship of Scepticism with Philosophy. Trans. 1985 in Di Giovanni, G. and Harris, H. S. (eds.), Between Kant and Hegel, Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, New York: Suny Press, 311–62.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1830). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse, II: Naturphilosophie, Heidelberg: Winter. Trans. 1970 Miller, A. V., The Philosophy of Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven Psychologies, New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1927 [1957]). Sein und Zeit, Tübingen: M. Niemeyer. Trans. 1962 Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., Being and Time, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Trans. 1967 Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., Being and Time, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit, Halle: Niemeyer. Trans. 1962 Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., Being and Time, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Trans. 1962 Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., Being and Time, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1929). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, Bonn: Friedrich Cohen Trans 1990 Taft, R., Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1947). Brief über denHumanismus’, Berne: A. Franke Verlag. Reprinted 1976 in Wegmarken (Gesamtausgabe, vol. IX), Frankurt on Main: V. Klostermann. Trans. 1998 Capuzzi, F. A.Letter on Humanism’ in Pathmarks, ed. McNeill, W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1950). Holzwege, Frankfurt on Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Trans. 2002 Young, J. and Haynes, K., Off the Beaten Track, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1953). Einführung in die Metaphysik (Gesamtausgabe vol. XL), Frankfurt: V. Klosterman. Trans. 1961 Manheim, R., An Introduction to MetaphysicsNew York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1953). Einführung in die Metaphysik, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Trans 1959 Manheim, R., Introduction to Metaphysics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1954). Die Frage nach der Technik (Vorträge und Aufsätze, 13–44), Pfullingen: Verlag Günter Neske. Trans. 1977 Lovitt, W., The Question Concerning Technology (Basic Writings, 283–317), New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1959). Gelassenheit, Pfullingen: Günther Neske. Trans. 1966 Anderson, J. M. and Freund, E. H., Discourse on Thinking, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1960). Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes, Stuttgart: Reclam. Lecture first delivered Freiburg, 1935. Trans. 1971 Hofstadter, A., ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’ in Poetry, Language, Thought, New York: Harper and Row, 15–88.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1961). Nietzsche, Pfullingen: Günther Neske, 2 vols. Trans. 1979–87, Krell, D. F. and Capuzzi, F., Nietzsche, New York: Harper and Row, 4 vols.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1967). ‘Was ist Metaphysik?’ in Wegmarken, Frankfurt on Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag. Trans. 1977 Krell, D. Farrell, ‘What is Metaphysics?’ in Krell, D. Farrell (ed.), Basic Writings, London: Routledge, 89–110.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1967). Wegmarken, Frankfurt on Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Trans. 1997 Krell, D. F., McNeill, W., and Sallis, J., Pathmarks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1969). ‘Das Ende der Philosophie und die Aufgabe des Denkens’ in Zur Sache des Denkens, Tübingen: Niemeyer. Trans. 1977 Farrell Krell, D., ‘The End of Philosophy and the Task for Thinking’ in Krell, D. Farrell, Basic Writings, London: Routledge, 427–49.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1969). ‘Zeit und Sein’ in Zur Sache des Denkens, Tübingen: Niemeyer1–26. Lecture delivered Freiburg, 1962. Trans 1972. Stambaugh, J., ‘Time and Being’ in On Time and Being, New York: Harper and Row, 1–24.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1975–). Gesamtausgabe, Frankfurt on Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1975). Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (Gesamtausgabe vol. XXIV), Frankfurt: V. Klosterman. Trans. 1982 Hofstadter, A., The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1975). Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (Gesamtausgabe, vol. XXIV) Frankfurt: V. Klostermann. Lectures delivered Marburg, 1927. Trans. 1982 Hofstadter, A., The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1978). Metaphysische Anfangsgrunde der Logik (Gesamtausgabe, vol. XXVI), Frankfurt: V. Klostermann. Lectures delivered Marburg, 1928. Trans. 1984 Heim, M., The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1989). Beiträge zur Philosophie (vom Ereignis), (Gesamtausgabe, vol. LXV) Frankfurt: V. Klostermann. Writings, 1936–9.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. et al. (1976). Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten in Der Spiegel, 30. Jg., Nr. 23, 31 May 1976. Trans. 1990 Harries, L. in Martin Heidegger and National Socialism, ed. Neske, G. and Kettering, E., New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, M. (1987). ‘Fechner’s Indeterminism: From Freedom to Laws of Chance’ in Krüger, 1987, vol. I, 117–56.Google Scholar
Heijenoort, Jean (ed.) (1967). From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heisig, James W. and Maraldo, John C. (eds.) (1994). Rude Awakenings: Zen, The Kyoto School, and the Question of Nationalism, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1984). Introduction to Critical Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. Vōn (1865). ‘Über das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaften zur Gesamtheit der Wissenschaft’ in Populäre wissenschaftliche Vorträge, erstes Heft (Popular Scientific Lectures, no. 1), Braunschweig: F. Vieweg, 3–29. Trans. 1971 Kahl, R., ‘The Relation of the Natural Sciences to Science in General’ in Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 122–43.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von. (1903). Vorträge und Reden, 5th edn, 2 vols., Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von (1855). Ueber das Sehen des Menschen (Ein popular-wissenschaftlicher Vortrag), Leipzig: Voss.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von (1856–67). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, 3 vols., 2nd edn, Hamburg: Voss, 1896. Trans. 1924–5 Southall, J., Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3 vols., New York: Optical Society of America.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von (1870). ‘Über den Ursprung und die Bedeutung geometrischen Axiome’ in Helmholtz, 1903, vol. II, 1–31, 381–3. Trans. Ewald, W., ‘On the Origin and Significance of Geometrical Axioms’ in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 662–85.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von (1878). ‘Über den Ursprung und die Bedeutung geometrischen Axiome (II)’ in Helmholtz, H., Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen von Hermann Helmholtz. Drei Bände, 1882–95 Leipzig: J. A. Barth, vol. II, 640–62. Trans Ewald, W., ‘On the Origin and Significance of Geometrical Axioms (II)’ in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 685–9.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von (1894). ‘Über den Ursprung der richtigen Deutung unserer Sinneseindrücke’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie der Sinnesorgane 7, 81–96. Trans. 1986 Warren, R. M. and Warren, R. P., ‘The Origin of the Correct Interpretation of our Sensory Impressions’ in Helmholtz on Perception: Its Physiology and Development, New York: John Wiley, 249–60.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik, Leipzig: Voss. Trans. 1924–5 Southall, J. P. C., Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3 vols., Milwaukee: Optical Society of America.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, Paul (1939). ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 15: 135–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1935). ‘Analyse logique de la psychologie’, Revue de synthèse 10: 27–42 Trans. 1949 Sellars, W., ‘Logical Analysis of Psychology’ in Feigl, H. and Sellars, W. (eds.), Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 373–84.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1942). ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, Journal of Philosophy 39: 35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1942). ‘The Problem of Historical Knowledge’, The Journal of Philosophy 39: 35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1945). ‘Studies in the Logic of Confirmation’, Mind 54: 1–26, 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1950). ‘Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning’, Revue International de Philosophie, 11. Repr. in Linsky, 1952, 163–88.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1962). ‘Explanation in Science and in History’ in Colodny, R. G. (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 9–33.Google Scholar
Henkin, L. (1949). ‘The Completeness of the First-order Functional Calculus’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 14: 159–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, M. (ed.) (1961). Documents of Gestalt Psychology, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Henry, A. (1988). ‘La réception de Schopenhauer en France’ in Luft, E. (ed.), Schopenhauer: New Essays in Honour of His 200th Birthday, New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 188–215.Google Scholar
Henry, M. (1985). Généalogie de la psychanalyse: le commencement perdu, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1993 Brick, D., The Genealogy of Psychoanalysis, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herbart, J. F. (1816). Lehrbuch zur Psychologie, Königsberg and Leipzig: Unzer. Trans. 1891 Smith, M. K., A Text-Book in Psychology, New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Herbart, J. F. (1824–5). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik, Königsberg: Unzer.Google Scholar
Herbart, J. F. (1824). Psychologie als Wissenschaft, neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. (Psychology as a Science, newly founded on Experience, Metaphysics and Mathematics), Königsberg: Unzer.Google Scholar
Hering, E. (1861–4). Beiträge zur Physiologie (Contributions to Physiology), Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Hering, E. (1868). Die Lehre vom binocularen Sehen (The Theory of Binocular Vision), Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Hering, E. (1870). Über das Gedächtnis als eine allgemeine Funktion der organisierte Materie, Vienna: Karl Gerold. Trans. 1880 Butler, S., ‘On Memory as a Universal Function of Organised Matter’ in Butler, 1880, 97–133.Google Scholar
Héring, J. (1925). Phénoménologie et philosophie religieuse (Phenomenology and Religions Philosophy), Paris: 1926.Google Scholar
Herken, R., (ed.) (1988). The Universal Turing Machine, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Wilhelm (1876). Die Metaphysik in der Theologie (Metaphysics in Theology), Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Wilhelm (1879). Die Religion im Verhältnis zum Welterkennen und zur Sittlichkeit (Religion and Its Relation to Science and Morality), Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Wilhelm (1886). Der Verkehr des Christen mit Gott, Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta. Trans. 1906 Stewart, R. W., The Communion of the Christian with God, London: Williams and Norgate. From the 4th German edn 1903. Repr. with introduction by Voekel, R.. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1971; London, 1972.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Wilhelm (1901). Ethik, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Wilhelm (1925). Dogmatik, ed. Rade, M., Stuttgart: F. A. Perthes. Trans. 1927 Micklem, N. and Saunders, K. A., Systematic Theology, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Wilhelm (1966–7). Schriften zur Grundlegung der Theologie (Writings on Laying the Foundations of Theology), 2 vols., Munich: Kaiser Verlag.Google Scholar
Hersch, J., Lévinas, E., Ricoeur, P., and Tilliette, X. (1976). Jean Wahl et Gabriel Marcel, Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. R. (1894). Die Prinzipien der Mechanik. Trans. 1899 Jones, D. E. and Whalley, J. T., The Principles of Mechanics, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, L. (1994). ‘“The Kind of Certainty is the Kind of Language Game”’ in The Limits of Experience, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 56.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary (1966). Models and Analogies in Science, South Bend: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, H. J. W. and Muirhead, J. H. (1918). Social Purpose: A Contribution to a Philosophy of Civic Society, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Heyting, A. (1930a). ‘Die formalen Regeln der intuitionistischen Logik’, Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, 16: 42–56.Google Scholar
Heyting, A. (1930b). ‘Die formalen regeln der intuitionistischen Mathematik’, Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, 16: 57–71, 158–69.Google Scholar
Hicks Dawes, G. (1917). ‘Are the Materials of Sense Affections of the Mind?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 17: 434–45Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. and Ackermann, W. (1928). Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik, Berlin: Springer. 2nd edn 1938. Trans. 1950 Hammond, L. M. et al., ed. Luce, R. E., Principles of Mathematical Logic, New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P. (1934). Grundlagen der Mathematik (Foundations of Mathematics), Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P. (1939). Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. II, Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1899). ‘Grundlagen der Geometrie [Foundations of Geometry]’ in Festschrift zur Feier der Enthüllung des Gauss-Weber-Denkmals in Göttingen, 1899. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1899). Grundlagen der Geometrie, Leipzig: Teubner. Trans. 1971 Unger, L. and Bernays, P., Foundations of Geometry, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1900). ‘Mathematische Probleme. Vortrag, gehalten auf dem internationalen Mathematiker-Kongress zu Paris 1900’, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 253–97. Trans. 1902 Newson, M. W., ‘Mathematical Problems. Lecture Delivered Before the International Congress of Mathematicians at Paris in 1900’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 8: 437–79 Repr. 1976 in Browder, F. (ed.), Mathematical Developments Arising from Hilbert Problems (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 28: 1), Providence: American Mathematical Society, 1–34.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1900a). ‘Über den Zahlbegriff’, Jahresbericht der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 8: 180–4. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W., ‘On the Concept of Number’ in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 1089–95.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1918). ‘Axiomatisches Denken’, Mathematische Annalen 78: 405–15. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W., ‘Axiomatic Thought’ in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 1105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1926). ‘Über das Unendliche’, Mathematische Annalen 95: 161–90 Trans. Mengelberg, S. Bauer, ‘On the Infinite’ in Heijenoort, 1967, 367–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1935). Gesammelte Abhandlungen, 3 vols., Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1968). Grundlagen der Geometrie, 10th edn, Leipzig: Teubner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilferding, Rudolf (1910). Das Finanzkapital, Vienna: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung. Trans. 1978 Bottomore, T., Watnick, M., and Gordon, S., Finance Capital, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America: A Historical Survey, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, F. (1891). Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüllee. Eine logische Untersuchung (The New Theory of Categorical Syllogisms. A Logical Investigation), Vienna.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, P. Q. (ed.) (1989). The Pluralist Theory of the State: Selected Writings of G. D. H. Cole, J. N. Figgis and H. J. Laski, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1896). The Theory of Knowledge: A Contribution to Some Problems of Logic and Metaphysics, London: Methuen, 3rd edn 1921.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1901). Mind in Evolution, London: Macmillan, 3rd edn 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1904). Democracy and Reaction, London: Fisher Unwin, 2nd edn 1909.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1906). Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics, 2 vols., London: Chapman and Hall, 3rd edn 1913.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1911). Liberalism, London: Williams and Norgate. New edn 1964, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1911a). Liberalism, London: Williams and Norgate. New edn 1994, Meadowcroft, J. (ed.), L. T. Hobhouse: Liberalism and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1911b). Social Evolution and Political Theory, New York: Columbia University Press. Ch. IX reprinted 1994 in Meadowcroft, J. (ed.), L. T. Hobhouse: Liberalism and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152–65.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1913a). Development and Purpose: An Essay Towards a Philosophy of Evolution, London: Macmillan, 2nd edn 1929.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1913b). ‘The Historical Evolution of Property, in Fact and Idea’ in Gore, C. (ed.), Property, Its Duties and Rights: Historically, Philosophically and Religiously Regarded, London and New York: Macmillan, 1–33. Repr. 1994 in Meadowcroft, J. (ed.), L. T. Hobhouse: Liberalism and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175–98.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1918). The Metaphysical Theory of the State: A Criticism, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1921). The Rational Good: A Study in the Logic of Practice, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1922). The Elements of Social Justice, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1924). Social Development: Its Nature and Conditions, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. & Ginsberg, M. (1931). L. T. Hobhouse: His Life and Work, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1934). Democracy and a Changing Civilisation, London: John Lane The Bodley Head Ltd.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. (1974). ‘Organization and the Gestalt tradition’ in Carterette, E. C. and Friedman, M. P. (eds.), Handbook of Perception, vol I: Historical and Philosophical Roots of Perception.New York: Academic, 180–211.Google Scholar
Hocking, W. E. (1912). The Meaning of God in Human Experience, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hocking, W. E. (1940). Living Religions and a World Faith, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hodges, A. (1983). Alan Turing: The Enigma. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L. (1930). Essays in Christian Philosophy, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Leonard (1943). Towards a Christian Philosophy, London: Nisbet.Google Scholar
Hoernlé, R. F. Alfred (1920). Studies in Contemporary Metaphysics, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hoernlé, R. F. Alfred (1927). Idealism as a Philosophy, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hoernlé, R. F. Alfred (1939). South African Native Policy and the Liberal Spirit, Capetown: University of Capetown Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. (1972). Albert Einstein – Creator and Rebel (written in collaboration with Dukas, Helen), New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Albert and Kuhns, Richard (eds.) (1964). Philosophies of Art and Beauty: Selected Readings from Plato to Heidegger, New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Holdcroft, D. (1991). Saussure: Signs, System and Arbitrariness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holenstein, E. (1975). Roman Jakobson’s Approach to Language: Phenomenological Structuralism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. (1987). Classical Economics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. (1881). The Common Law, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. (1896–7). ‘The Path of the Law’, Harvard Law Review, 10: 457–78 Reprinted 1920 in Collected Legal Papers, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Howe, 167–202.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. (1905). Lochner v New York (dissenting opinion), United States Reports, vol. 198: 45–76, at 74–6. Reprinted 1992 in The Essential Holmes, ed. Posner, Richard A., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 305–7.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1915). ‘Response and Cognition’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12: 365–73, 393–409. Repr. 1915 in Holt, E. B., The Freudian Wish and Its Place in Ethics, New York: Holt, 153–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, E. B. et al. (1912). The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holt, Edwin et al. (1912). The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holt, N. R. (1971). ‘Ernst Haeckel’s Monistic Religion’, Journal of the History of Ideas 32: 265–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holton, G. (1960). ‘On the Origins of the Special Theory of Relativity’, American Journal of Physics 28: 627–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, G. (1986). The Advancement of Science, and its Burdens, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzhey, H. (1986). Cohen und Natorp, Basle and Stuttgart: Schwabe and Co. Ag. Verlag.Google Scholar
Hook, S. (ed.) (1964). Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method and Philosophy, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hook, Sidney (1927). The Metaphysics of PragmatismChicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hook, Sidney (1934). ‘What is Materialism?The Journal of Philosophy 24: 235–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, Sidney (1944). ‘Is Physical Realism Sufficient?The Journal of Philosophy 41, 544–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, C. J. (1985). Peirce, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1944). Dialektik der Aufklärung (The Dialectic of Enlightenment), Amsterdam: Quierdo. Trans. 1969 Cumming, J., New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1931). ‘Die gegenwärtige Lage der Sozialphilosophie und die Aufgaben eines Instituts für Sozialforschung’, Frankfurter Universitätsreden 27, 1–26. Trans. 1993 Hunter, G. F., Kramer, M., and Torpey, J., Between Philosophy and Social Science, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1937). ‘Traditionelle und kritische Theorie’, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6: 2, 245–83. Trans. 1982 O'Connell, M., Critical Theory, New York: Continuum, 188–244.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1947). The Eclipse of ReasonNew York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1972). ‘Schopenhauer und die Gesellschaft’ in Sozialphilosophische Studien, Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum Fischer, 68–77.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1972). Critical Theory: Selected Essays, ed. O'Connell, M. J. et al., New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1995). Between Philosophy and Social Science: Early Selected Writings. Trans. Hunter, G. Frederick, Kramer, M. S., and Torpey, J., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Houang, F. (1954). Le néo-hégélianisme en Angleterre: la philosophie de Bernard Bosanquet, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E. (1989). A History of Marxian Economics, vol. I: 1882–1929, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, Ch. (ed.) (1992). The Cambridge Companion to Sartre, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hubble, E. (1929). ‘A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-galactic Nebulae’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA) 15: 168–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hude, H. (1989–90). Bergson, Paris: Editions Universitaires.Google Scholar
Hugel, Fr. (1921, 1926). Essays and Addresses, series I, II, London: Dent.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1930). ‘Simple Trial-and-Error Learning: A Study in Psychological Theory’, Psychological Review 37: 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1937). ‘Mind, Mechanism, and Adaptive Behavior’, Psychological Review 44: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory, New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1952). A Behavior System: An Introduction to Behavior Theory Concerning the Individual Organism, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1984). Mechanisms of Adaptive Behavior: Clark L. Hull’s Theoretical Papers, With Commentary in Amsel, A. and Rashotte, M. E. (eds.), New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, N. E. H. (1997). Roscoe Pound & Karl Llewellyn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, E. V. (1904). ‘Sets of Independent Postulates for the Algebra of Logic’, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 5: 288–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, P. E. (1988). ‘Dewey on Desires: The Lost Argument’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 24: 509–19.Google Scholar
Husserl, , (1913). Ideen zu einer Reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie, Halle: Niemeyer. Trans. 1931 Gibson, W. R. Boyce, Ideas toward a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1891). Philosophie der Arithmetik, Halle: C. E. M. Pfeffer. Repr. 1970 in Husserliana XII, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1891). Philosophie der Arithmetik, Halle: C. E. M. Pfeffer.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1894). ‘Intentionale Gegenstände’ in Husserliana 22, The Hague: Nijhoff. 1979, 303–48.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1900/1). Logische Untersuchungen. Halle: M. Niemayer. Reprinted 1975, 1984 in Husserliana XVIII, XIX, The Hague: Nijhoff. Trans. 1970 Findlay, J. N., Logical Investigations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1900–1). Logische Untersuchungen, Halle a.d.S.: Max Niemeyer. 2nd edn in two parts 1913–22. Trans. 1957 Findlay, J. N., Logical Investigations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1913). ‘Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie’, Jahrbuch fur Philosophie und phänemenologische Forschung, 1: 1–323 Trans. 1982 Kersten, F., Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1928). ‘Vorlesungen zur Phenomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins’, (ed. Heidegger, M.), Jahrbuch fur Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 9: 367–498 Trans. 1964 Churchill, J. W., The Phenomenology of Internal Time Consciousness, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1929). ‘Formale und transcendentale Logik’ in Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 10, 1–298. Reprinted 1974 in Husserliana XVII, The Hague: Nijhoff. Trans. 1969 Cairns, D., Formal and Transcendental Logic, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1931). Méditations cartésiennes, trans. Pfeiffer, G. and Levinas, E., Paris: Colin. German version reprinted 1950 in Husserliana, I, The Hague: Nijhoff. Trans. 1973 Cairns, D., Cartesian Meditations, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1936). ‘Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie’, Philosophia 1: 77–176. Repr. 1954 in Husserliana, vol. VI, trans. 1970 Carr, David, The Hague: Nijhoff. The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1950). Die Idee der Phaenomenologie, Funf Vorlesungen, in Gesammelte Werke, vol. II, ed. Biemel, Walter, The Hague: Nijhoff. These are five lectures delivered by Husserl, in Göttingen, in 1907. Trans. 1964 Alston, W. P. and Nakhinian, G., The Idea of Phenomenology, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. (1978). On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Leonard (ed.) (1900). Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidence as to Man’s Place in Nature, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1874). ‘On the Hypothesis that Animals are Automata’, in Collected Essays, 9 vols., London: Macmillan 1898, vol. I, Methods and Results, 199–250.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1894). Evolution and Ethics, and Other Essays, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1863). Evidence as to Man’s Place in Nature, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1879). Hume, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1893–94). Collected Essays, 9 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1898–1902). Scientific Memoirs, ed. Foster, M. and Lankester, E. R., 5 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hylton, P. (1990) Russell, idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hylton, P. (1990). Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingaarden, R. (1931). Das Literarische Kunstwark, Halle: Niemeyer. Trans. 1973 Grabowicz, G. G., The Literary Work of Art, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ingardia, R. (ed.) (1991) Bradley: A Research Bibliography, Bowling Green: Philosophy Documentation Center.Google Scholar
Ingenieros, José (1919). Principios de Psicología (Principles of Psychology), Obras completas (Complete Works), vol. IX, Buenos Aires: Elmer Editor, 1956. A first version (1910) was entitled Principios de Psicología biológica (Principles of Biological Psychology).Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. and Israel, G. (1987). La Mano Invisible, Roma–Bari: Guis. Laterza and Figli Spa. Trans. 1990 McGilvray, I., The Invisible Hand, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Izuzquiza, I. (1984). El proyecto filosófico de Juan David García Bacca (The Philosophical Project of Juan David García Bacca), Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (1998). Wittgenstein’s Thought in Transition, Indianapolis, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Jacquette, Dale (ed.) (1996). Schopenhauer, Philosophy and the Arts.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffé, W. (1976). ‘Jevons, Menger, and Walras De-Homogenized’, Economic Inquiry 14: 511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffé, W. (1983).William Jaffé’s Essays on Walras, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jager, R. (1972). The Development of Bertrand Russell’s Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols., New York: Henry Holt. New edn 1950, New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, New York: Holt. New edn 1981, Bowers, F. (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1891). ‘The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life’, repr. 1956 in The Will To Believe and Other Essays on Popular Philosophy, New York: Dover, 184–215.Google Scholar
James, W. (1897). The Will to Believe and other Essays in Popular Philosophy, New York: Longmans, Green. New edn 1979, ed. Bowers, F., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study of Human Behaviour, New York and London: Longmans, Green. New edn 1985, ed. Bowers, F., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience, New York: Longmans, Green. Repr. 1982, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for some Old Ways of Thinking, New York and London: Longman, Green & Co. New edn 1975, ed. Bowers, F., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1909a). A Pluralistic Universe, New York and London: Longmans, Green. New edn 1977, ed. Bowers, F., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1909b). The Meaning of Truth, New York: Longmans, Green. New edn 1975, ed. Bowers, F., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1912). Essays in Radical Empiricism, New York: Longmans, Green. New edn 1976, ed. Bowers, F., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1916). Some Problems of Philosophy, New York: Longmans, Green. New edn 1979 ed. Bowers, F., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William (1897). The Will to Believe and Other Essays, New York and London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
James, William (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study of Human Behaviour, New York and London: Longmans, Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, New York and London: Longmans, Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William (1909). A Pluralistic Universe, New York and London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
James, William (1909). The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to Pragmatism, New York and London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
James, William (1912). Essays in Radical Empiricism, New York and London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
James, William (1975–90). The Works of William James, 21 vols., ed. Burkhardt, F. H., Bowers, F. and Skrupskelis, I. K., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1889). L'Automatisme psychologique: essai de psychologie expérimentale sur les formes inférieures de l'activité humaine, Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1907–8). ‘Symposium on the subconscious’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2, 58–67. Repr. in Münsterberg, et al. 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankélévitch, Vladimir (1959). Henri Bergson, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Jaśkowski, S. (1934). On the Rules of Supposition in Formal Logic, Warsaw: Nakładem Seminarium Filozoficznego Wydzialn Matematyczno-Przyrodnicznego Universy tetr Warszawskeigo. Repr. 1967 in McCall, S. (ed.), Polish Logic 1920–37, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1936). Nietzsche: Einführung in das Verständnis seines Philosophierens, Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter. Trans. 1965 Wallraff, C. F. and Schmitz, F. J., Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Understanding of His Philosophical Activity, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jastrow, J. (1901). Fact and Fable in Psychology, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jastrow, J. (1906). The Subconscious, London: Archibald Constable.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jastrow, J. (1907–8). ‘Symposium on the Subconscious’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2, 37–43. Repr. in Münsterberg, et al. 1911.Google Scholar
Jay, M. (1984a). AdornoCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jay, M. (1984b). Max Horkheimer and the Retreat from Hegelian Marxism in Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to HabermasBerkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin (1973). The Dialectical Imagination, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Jeans, James Sir (1930). The Mysterious Universe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New edn 1937, Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. (1939). Theory of Probability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, H. S. (1906). Behavior of the Lower Organisms, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. (1864). Pure Logic, London: E. Stanford.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. (1871 [1957]). The Theory of Political Economy, 5th edn (ed. Jevons, H. S.) London: Macmillan. Repr. edn 1965, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. (1874 [1877]).The Principles of Science, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jhering, R. (1852–65). Geist des römischen Rechts (Spirit of the Roman Law), 3 parts (the second of which is divided into two volumes): pt 1 (1852), pt 2 (1854), pt 2.2 (1858), pt 3 (1865), Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel. Repr. 1891, 1894, 1898, 1906.Google Scholar
Jhering, R. (1872). Der Kampf um’s Recht, Vienna: G. J. Manz. Trans. 1924 Lalor, J. J., The Struggle for Law, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jhering, R. (1877, 1884). Der Zweck des Rechts (The Purpose of the Law), 2 vols., Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel. Trans. 1914 Husik, I., Law as a Means to an End (vol. I only), Boston: Boston Book Co.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Landi, A. (1996). La Institución Libre de Enseñanza (The Institute of Free Education) 4 vols., Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. (1906). The Nature of Truth: An Essay, 2nd edn 1939, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joas, H. (1980). Praktische Intersubjektivität: Die Entwicklung des Werkes von George Herbert Mead, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1985 Meyer, R., George Herbert Mead: A Contemporary Reexamination of his Thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. (1993). Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. (1953–7). Sigmund Freud: Life and Work, 3 vols., London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Jones, M. M. (1991). Gaston Bachelard, Subversive Humanist: Texts and Readings, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Z. (1945). The Development of Mathematical Logic and of Logical Positivism in Poland between Two Wars, Oxford: Oxford University Press; repr. in McCall, 1967, 346–406.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1906). An Introduction to Logic, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1916). An Introduction to Logic (2nd edn), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1931). ‘Short Treatise on Propositional Functions’, New College Archives, Oxford, PA/J/2 10/5 (there are two versions of the treatise).Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1931). Some Problems in Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1932). ‘Lectures on Internal and External Relations and the Philosophy of Analysis’ (subtitled inside the notes ‘Lectures on Logical Atomism’), New College Archives, Oxford, PA/J/2 3/3.Google Scholar
Jünger, E. (1920). In Stahlgewittern, Berlin. Trans. 1929 The Storm of Steel, London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Jünger, E. (1928). Das Wäldchen 125, Berlin: F. Mittler. Trans. 1930 Creighton, B., Copse 125, London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Kadarkay, A. (1991). Georg Lukács: Life, Thought, and PoliticsOxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kamenka, E. (1972). ‘Communism, Philosophy under’ in Edwards, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kanitscheider, B. (1972). ‘Die Rolle der Geometrie innerhalb physikalischer Theorien’, Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 26: 42–55.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781(A), 1787(B)). Kritik der reinen Vernuft, Riga. Trans. 1929 Smith, N. Kemp, Critique of Pure Reason, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781, 1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Riga: Hartknoch. Trans. 1998 Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W., Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 2nd edn, Riga: Hartknoch. Trans. 1933 Smith, N. Kemp, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1787). Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, Riga: J. F. Hartknoch. Trans. 1933 Smith, N. Kemp, The Critique of Pure Reason, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft, Berlin: Lagarde und Friederich. Trans. 1952 Meredith, J. C., The Critique of Judgment, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Trans. 2000 Guyer, P. and Matthews, E., Critique of the Power of Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1797). Die Metaphysik der Sitten, Erster Theil, metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (First Part, Metaphysical First Principles of the Theory of Law), Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius. Trans. 1991 Gregor, M., The Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–177.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1781, 1787). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. 1998 Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. (1974). Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist, 4th edn Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter (1950). Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 4th edn, 1974.Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl (1892). Das Erfurter Programm, Stuttgart: Dietz, J. H. W.. Trans Bohm, W. E. 1910, repr. 1971 The Class Struggle, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl (1927). Die materialistische Geschichtsauffassung, Berlin: Dietz, J. H. W.. Trans. and abr. 1988 Kautsky, J. H., The Materialist Conception of History, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Alfred (1981). The Descent of Darwin: The Popularization of Darwinism in Germany, 1860–1914, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Michael, ed. (1998). Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1911). Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (Main Problems in the Theory of Public Law), Tübingen: Mohr, J. C. B., 2nd printing (1923) with new foreword. Trans. of ‘Foreword’ in Paulson, S. L. and Paulson, B. L. (eds. and trans.) (1998), 3–22.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1920). Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts (The Problem of Sovereignty and the Theory of International Law), Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1922a). Das soziologische und das juristische Staatsbegriff (The Sociological and the Legal Concept of the State), Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1922b). ‘Rechtswissenschaft und Recht’ (‘Legal Science and the Law’), Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 3: 103–235.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1923–4). ‘Die Lehre von den drei Gewalten oder Funktionen des Staates’ (‘The Doctrine of the Three Powers or Functions of the State’), Archiv für Rechts-und Wirtschaftsphilosophie, 17: 374–408.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1925). Allgemeine Staatslehre (General Constitutional Theory), Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1928). Die philosophischen Grundlagen der Naturrechtslehre und des Rechtspositivismus, Charlottenburg: Pan-Verlag Rolf Heise. Trans. 1945 Kraus, W. H. as an appendix to Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 389–446.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1934). Reine Rechtslehre (Pure Theory of Law) 1st edn, Leipzig and Vienna: Deuticke. Trans. 1992 Paulson, B. L. and Paulson, S. L., Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (the subtitle of the original work), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1941–2). ‘The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence’, Harvard Law Review 55: 44–70. Repr. 1957 (with omissions) in Kelsen, H., What is Justice?, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 266–87, 390 (notes).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State, trans. Wedberg, H., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1960). Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd edn, Vienna: Franz Deuticke. Trans. 1967 Knight, M., The Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1979). Ringhofer, K. and Walter, R. (eds.), Allgemeine Theorie der Normen, Vienna: Manz. Trans. 1991 Hartney, M., General Theory of Norms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kempe, A. B. (1889–90). ‘On the Relation between the Logical Theory of Classes and the Geometrical Theory of Points’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 21: 147–82.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. J. (1973). Wittgenstein, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (1984). ‘Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Mind’ in The Legacy of Wittgenstein, Oxford: Blackwell: 1–9.Google Scholar
Ker, Ian (1988). John Henry Newman: A Biography, Oxford: Clarendon Press. The fullest account of his life and writings.Google Scholar
Ketner, K. L. (1977). A Comprehensive Bibliography and Index of the Published Works of Charles Sanders Peirce with a Bibliography of Secondary Studies, Greenwich, CT: Johnson Associates.Google Scholar
Ketner, K. (ed.) (1995). Peirce and Contemporary Thought, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Kettler, David, Meja, Volker, and Nico, Stehr (1984). Karl Mannheim, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1919). The Economic Consequences of the Peace, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1925). ‘Am I a Liberal?’, Nation and Atheneum, 8 and 15 August. Repr. 1972 in Essays in Persuasion, Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. IX, London: Macmillan, 295–306.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1926). The End of Laissez-Faire. London: Hogarth Press. Repr. 1972 in Essays in Persuasion, Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. IX, London: Macmillan, 272–94.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1927). ‘Liberalism and Industry’, in Nathan, H. L. and Williams, H. Heathcote (eds.), Liberal Points of View, London: Ernest Benn, 205–19. Repr. 1981 in Moggridge, D. (ed.), Activities 1922–29, Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIX, London: Macmillan, 638–48.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan. Repr. 1973 in Moggridge, D. and Robinson, A. (eds.), The Collected Works of John Maynard Keynes, vol. VIII, LondonMacmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. N. (1884). Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic, London: Macmillan. 4th edn 1928.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. N. (1890). Scope and Method of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kijania-Placek, K. and Woleński, J. (eds.) (1988). The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (1992). ‘Downward Causation in Emergence and Nonreductive Physicalism’ in Beckermann, A., et al. (eds.) (1992), 119–38.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1993). The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kleene, S. C. (1935). ‘λ Theory of Positive Integers in Formal Logic’, American Journal of Mathematics 57: 153–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleene, S. C. (1936a. ‘λ-definability and Recursiveness’, Duke Mathematical Journal 2: 340–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleene, S. C. (1981). ‘Origins of Recursive Function Theory’, Annals of the History of Computing 3: 52–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleene, S. (1945). ‘On the Interpretation of Intuitionistic Number Theory’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 10: 109–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleene, S.C. (1936b). ‘General Recursive Functions of Natural Numbers’, Mathematische Annalen 112: 727–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, F. (1895). ‘Über die Arithmetisierung der Mathematik’, Nachrichten der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, gesellschäftliche Mitteilungen 1895 (2), Part 2. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W., ‘The Arithmetising of Mathematics’ in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 965–71.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, J. T. (1986). Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. C. and Kneale, M. (1962). The Development of Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, S. and Nomizu, K. (1962). Foundations of Differential Geometry, 2 vols. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Koch, S. (1954). ‘Clark L. Hull’ in Poffenberger, A. T. (ed.), Modern Learning Theory, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1–176.Google Scholar
Kockelmans, J. J. (ed.) (1972). On Heidegger and Language, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Koffka, K. (1922). ‘Perception: An Introduction to Gestalt-theorie’, Psychological Bulletin 19: 531–85 Available at: http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Koffka/Perception/perception.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1913). ‘Über unbemerkte Empfindungen und Urteilstäuschungen’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie 66: 51–80.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1927). Intelligenzprüfungen an Menschenaffen. Trans. 1938 The mentality of apes, New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology, New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1959). ‘Gestalt psychology today’, American Psychologist 14: 727–34 Repr. 1978 in Hilgard, E. R. (ed.), American Psychology in Historical Perspective: Addresses of the Presidents of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 251–63.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1967 [1971]). ‘Gestalt Psychology’, Psychologische Forschung, 31, xviii–xxx. Reprinted in Köhler, 1971, 108–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köhler, W. (1971). The Selected Papers of Wolfgang Köhler, New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Köhnke, K. C. (1986). Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neu-Kantianismus, trans. 1991 Hollingdale, R. J. as The Rise of Neo-Kantianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. (1947). Introduction à la lecture de Hegel, Paris: Gallimard. Trans. (part only) 1969 Nichols, J. H., Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L. (1985). Bergson, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1933). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Berlin: Springer–Verlag. Trans. 1950 Morrison, N., Foundations of the Theory of Probability, New York: Chelsea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotarbiński, T. (1929). Elementy teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk, Lvov: Ossolineum. Trans. 1966 Wojtasiewicz, O., Gnosiology: The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon Press and Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Kotarbiński, T. (1955). Traktat o dobrej robocie, Warsaw: PWN. Trans. 1965 Wojtasiewicz, O., Praxiology: An Introduction to the Science of Efficient Action, Oxford: Pergamon Press; Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Kotarbiński, T. (1958). ‘Fazy rozwoju konkretyzmu’ (‘The Development Stages of Concretism’), Studia Filozoficzne, 4 (7), 3–13.Google Scholar
Kotarbiński, T. (1966). Gnosiology. The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, Wroclaw: Ossolineum and Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kretschmann, E. (1917). ‘Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulate, A. Einstein’s neue und seine ursprüngliche Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 53: 575–614Google Scholar
Krikorian, Y. H. (1944). Naturalism and the Human Spirit, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1959). ‘A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronecker, L. (1887). ‘Über den Zahlbegriff’, in Philosophische Aufsätze, Eduard Zeller zu seinem fünfzigjährigen Doctorjubiläum gewidmet, Leipzig: Fues, 261–74, also Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 101: 337–55. Trans. 1996 Ewald, W., ‘On the Concept of Number’ in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 947–55.Google Scholar
Krüger, J. G. (1756). Versuch einer Experimental-Seelenlehre, Halle: C. H. Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Krüger, L.et al. (1987). The Probabilistic Revolution, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuklick, B. (1972) Josiah Royce: An Intellectual Biography, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kuklick, B. (1977). The Rise of American Philosophy: Cambridge Massachusetts 1860–1930, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kuklick, H. (1991). The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology, 1885–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Külpe, O. (1893). Grundriss der Psychologie, auf experimenteller Grundlage dargestellt, Leipzig: Engelmann. Trans. 1895 Titchener, E. B., Outlines of Psychology, Based upon the Results of Experimental Investigation, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (1929). Review of Hägerström, A., Der römische Obligationsrecht im Lichte der allgemeinen römischen Rechtsanschauung (The Roman Concept of Obligation in Light of the General Roman View of the Law) (1927), Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, romanistische Abteilung, 49: 479–90Google Scholar
Kusch, M. (1999). Psychological Knowledge: A Social History and Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labriola, Antonio (1896). Saggi interno alla concezione materialistica della storia. Trans. Kerr, C. 1908 Essays on the Materialist Conception of History, Chicago: Charles Kerr.Google Scholar
Lacey, A. R. (1989). Bergson, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lacroix, Jean (1968). Maurice Blondel: An Introduction to the Man and His Philosophy. Trans. Guinness, John C., New York: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Ladd, George Trumbull (1887). Elements of Physiological Psychology, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Ladd, George Trumbull (1894). Psychology, Descriptive and Explanatory, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Ladd, George Trumbull (1895). Philosophy of Mind: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Psychology, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1978). ‘Infinite Regress and Foundations of Mathematics’ in Philosophical Papers II, ed. Worrall, J. and Currie, G., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–23.Google Scholar
Lambeth, David (1999). William James and the Metaphysics of Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamprecht, K. (1896). Alte und neue Richtungen in der Geschichtswissenschaft (Old and New Directions in Historical Science), Berlin: R. Gaertners.Google Scholar
Lamprecht, K. (1900). Die kulturhistorische Methode (The Method of Cultural History), Berlin: R. Gaertners.Google Scholar
Lamprecht, K. (1904 [1909]). Moderne Geschichtswissenschaft: fünf Vorträge, 3rd edn, Berlin: Weidmannsche. Trans. 1905 Andrews, E. A., What is History?: Five Lectures on the Modern Science of History, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Landow, George P. (1985). Ruskin, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1865). Die Arbeiterfrage (The Question of the Worker), Winterthur: Bleuer-Hausheer, 3rd edn 1875.Google Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1866 [1887]). Geschichte des Materialismus. Iserlohn und Leipzig: Verlag von J. Baedeker. Trans. 1925 Thomas, E. C., History of Materialism, Boston, MA: Osgood.Google Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1866). Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart, 2 vols., 2nd edn 1887, Leipzig: Iserlohn. Trans. 1925 Thomas, E.C., The History of Materialism and Criticism of its Present Importance, 3rd edn, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1866). Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart, 2 vols., Iserlohn and Leipzig: J. Baedeker. Trans. 1925 Thomas, E. C., The History of Materialism and Criticism of its Present Importance, 3rd edn, 3 vols., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langer, Suzanne K. (1942). Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite and Art, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, T. A. (1969). In Search of Foundations: English Theology 1900–1920, Nashville: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Lapointe, F. H. and , C. (1977). Gabriel Marcel and his Critics, International Bibliography (1928–1976), New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Lapointe, F. and Lapointe, C. (eds.) (1976). Maurice Merleau-Ponty and His Critics (1942–1976), New York and London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Lask, E. (1924). Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte (Fichte’s Idealism and History). In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. I, ed. Herrigel, Eugen, Tübingen: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Latta, R. (1905). ‘Memoir’ in Latta, R. (ed.), Philosophical Studies by David George Ritchie, London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lavoie, D. (1985). Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavrov, P. I. (1965) Filosofiia i sotsiologiia: izbrannye proizvedeniia (Philosophy and Sociology: Selected Writings). Moscow: Mysl’, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Lavrov, P. L. (1860) Ocherki voprosov prakticheskogo filosofii (Essays on Questions of Practical Philosophy), St Petersburg: Glazunov.Google Scholar
Lavrov, P. L. (1870 [1891]). Istoricheskie pis'ma, Geneva. Trans. 1967 Scanlan, J. P., Historical Letters, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Le Senne, René (1930). Le Devoir, Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Leahey, T. H. (2003). A History of Psychology; Main Currents in Psychological Thought, 56th edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lecky, William Edward Hartpole (1869). History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne, London: Longmans, Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leduc-Fayette, D. (ed.) (1986, 1987). Colloque Maurice Blondel (Centre d'Etudes des Philosophes Français – Sorbonne), ‘Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger’ 1986 (IV) and 1987 (I).Google Scholar
Lee, Seong–Woo (1995). Das Wesen der Religion und ihr Verhältnis zu Wissenschaft und Sittlichkeit bei Wilhelm Herrmann (The Essence of Religion and Its Relationship to Science and Morality in Wilhelm Herrmann), Frankfurt-on-Main and New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lehan, R. (1992). ‘Bergson and the Discourse of the Moderns’ in Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (eds.) (1992), 277–305.Google Scholar
Lehrer, R. (1995). Nietzsche’s Presence in Freud’s Life and Thought: On the Origins of a Psychology of Dynamic Unconscious Mental Functioning, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1860). Mathematische Schriften, vol. VI, ed. Gerhardt, C. I., Halle.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1765). Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain, Raspe, R. E.; in Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. Robinet, A. and Schepers, H., Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1962, vol. VI, 43–27. Trans. 1981 Remnant, P. and Bennett, J., New Essays on Human Understanding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. (1920). Materialism and Empirio-criticism, London: Martin Lawrence.Google Scholar
Leśniewski, S. (1913b). ‘Krytyka logicznej zasady wyłaczonego środka’, Przeglad Filozoficzny, 16, 315–52. Trans. 1992 Surma, S. J. and Wójcik, J., ‘The Critique of the Logical Principle of the Excluded Middle’ in Leśniewski, 1992, 47–85.Google Scholar
Leśniewski, S. (1916). Podstawy ogólnej teorii mnogości, Moscow: Drukarnia Poplawskiego. Trans. 1992 Barnett, D. I., ‘Foundations of the General Theory of Sets’ in Leśniewski, 1992, 129–73.Google Scholar
Leśniewski, S. (1927). ‘O podstawach matematyki’, Przeglad Filozoficzny, 30. Trans. 1992 Barnett, D. I.On the Foundations of Mathematics’, in Leśniewski, 1992, 174–382.Google Scholar
Leśniewski, S. (1988). Lecture Notes in Logic, ed. Srzednicki, J. T. J. and Stachniak, Z., Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Leśniewski, S. (1992). Collected Works, vols. I–II, ed. Surma, S. J., Srzednicki, J. T. J., Barnett, D. I., and Rickey, V. T., Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Leśniewski, S. (1913a). ‘Czy prawda jest tylko wieczna, czy też wieczna i odwieczna?’, Now Tory, 18, 493–528. Trans. 1992 Surma, S. J. and Wójcik, J., ‘Is All Truth Only True Eternally or Is it also true Without a Beginning’ in Leśniewski, 1992, 86–114.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1930). La Théorie de l'intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1973 Orianne, A., The Theory of Intuition in Husserl’s Phenomenology, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1857). Biographical History of Philosophy, rev. edn, London: Parker & Son.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1874–5). ‘Psychological Principles’ (from Problems of Life and Mind, vol. I) in Lewes, G. H. and Mill, J. S., Foundations for a Science of Mind, London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1874–5). Problems of Life and Mind, First Series, Foundations of a Creed, 2 vols., Boston: Osgood.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1875). Problems of Life and Mind, 2 vols., 2nd edn 1883, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1877). Problems of Life and Mind, Second Series, The Physical Basis of Mind, Boston: Osgood.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1879). Problems of Life and Mind, Third Series, The Study of Psychology, Boston: Osgood.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1880). Problems of Life and Mind, Third Series, Continued, Boston: Osgood.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology, New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. and Langford, C. H. (1932). Symbolic Logic, New York: Appleton Century.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1912). ‘Implication and the Algebra of Logic’, Mind 21: 522–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1918). A Survey of Symbolic Logic, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1929). Mind and the World Order, New York: Charles Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1950). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Lewis, H. D. (1962). Freedom and History, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Lichnerowicz, A. (1955). Théories relativistes de la gravitation et de l'électromagnétisme, Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Liebmann, O. (1865). Kant und die Epigonen (Kant and the Epigones), Stuttgart: Carl Schoben. Repr. 1965, Erlangen: Fischer.Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard (1987). The Origins of Agnosticism: Victorian Unbelief and the Limits of Knowledge, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lindenbaum, A. and Tarski, A. (1926). ‘Communication sur les recherches de la théorie desensembles’ (‘Report on Research in the Theory of Sets’), Comptes Rendus des séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, Classe III, Sciences mathématiques et physiques 19: 299–330Google Scholar
Lindsay, R. B. and Margenau, H. (1957). Foundations of Physics, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Linsky, L. (ed.) (1952). Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lipps, T. (1897). ‘Der Begriff des Unbewußten in der Psychologie’, Dritter Internationaler Congress für Psychologie in München vom 4. bis 7. August 1896, Munich: J. F. Lehmann. Repr. 1974 Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus.Google Scholar
Lipps, T. (1903). Leitfaden der Psychologie, Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Littman, R. (1979). ‘Social and intellectual origins of experimental psychology’ in Hearst, E. (ed.), The First Century of Experimental Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Livingston, James C. (1974). The Ethics of Belief: An Essay on the Victorian Religious Conscience, Tallahassee, FL: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. (1937). The Questioning Mind, New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Loeb, J. (1900). Comparative Physiology of the Brain and Comparative Psychology, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
López-Morillas, J. (1956). El krausismo español. Perfil de una aventura intelectual (Spanish Krausism. Outline of an Intellectual Adventure), Madrid: F.C.E.; 2nd augmented edn 1980.Google Scholar
Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H. (1923). The Principle of Relativity. A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lorentz, H. A. (1905). Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lossky, N. O. (1951) History of Russian Philosophy. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Lotze, H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie, oder Physiologie der Seele, Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Lotze, H. (1874 [1880]). Logik: Drei Bücher, vom Denken, vom Untersuchen, und vom Erkennen, zweite Auflage (1st edn 1874), Leipzig: S. Hirzel. Trans. 1888 Bosanquet, B., Logic in Three Books, of Thought, of Investigation, and of Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lotze, H. (1874). Logik: Drei Bücher vom Denken, vom Untersuchen, und vom Erkennen, 2nd edn Leipzig: Hirzel, S.. Trans. 1884 (2nd edn 1887) Bosanquet, B., Logic in Three Books: Ontology, Cosmology and Psychology, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lotze, H. (1881). Grundzüge der Psychologie, 3rd edn, Leipzig: S. Hürzel, 1884. Trans. 1886 Ladd, G., Outlines of Psychology: Dictated Portions of the Lectures of Hermann Lotze, Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann (1845). Über den Begriff der Schönheit. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann (1856–64). Mikrokosmos: Ideen zur Naturgeschichte und Geschichte der Menschheit, 3 vols., Leipzig: Hirzel. Trans. 1885 Hamilton, E. and Jones, E. C., Microcosmos: An Essay concerning Man and his Relation to the World. 2 vols., Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark and New York: Scribner and Welford.Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann (1868). Geschichte der Ästhetik in Deutschland (History of Aesthetics in Germany), Munich: Cotta, 1868.Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann (1884). Die Grundzüge der Ästhetik: Diktate aus den Vorlesungen, Leipzig: Hirzel; modern edition from 1990: Stünke, Hein (ed.), Schriften zur Kunsttheorie VI, Berlin: Alexander Verlag; English translation in 1885 by Ladd, G. T., Outlines of Aesthetics: Dictated Portions of the Lectures of H. Lotze, Boston: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Lotze, R. H. (1856–64). Mikrokosmus: Ideen zur Naturgeschichte und Geschichte der Menschen, 3 vols., Leipzig: Hirzel. Trans. 1885 Hamilton, E. and Jones, E. C., Microcosmos: An Essay Concerning Man and his Relation to the World, 2 vols., Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark and New York: Scribner and Welford.Google Scholar
Lotze, R. H. (1874). Logik, 3 vols. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. Trans. 1884–8 Bosanquet, B., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. D. (1930). The Revolt Against Dualism, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1911). ‘The Import of Vitalism’, Science 34: 75–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovejoy, A. O. (1912). ‘The Meaning of Driesch and the Meaning of VitalismScience 36: 672–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovejoy, A. O. (1926). ‘The Meaning of “Emergence” and its Modes’ in Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Philosophy, New York, 20–33.Google Scholar
Lowe, V. (1966). Understanding Whitehead, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, V. (1985, 1990). Alfred North Whitehead: The Man and His Work, 2 vols., Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Löwenheim, L. (1915). ‘Über Möglichkeiten im Relativkalkül’, Mathematische Annalen 76: 447–70 Trans. Bauer-Mengelberg, S., ‘On Possibilities in the Calculus of Relatives’ in Heijenoort, 1967, 228–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwith, K. (1984). Heidegger: Denker in dürftiger Zeit: Zur Stellung der Philosophiein 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Löwy, Michael (1979). Georg Lukács – From Romanticism to Bolshevism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lubac, M., Rougier, M. and Sales, M. (1985). Introd. by Tilliette, X., Gabriel Marcel et Gaston Fessard, correspondance, Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Luce, A. A. (1954). Sense Without Matter, Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar
Luk'acs, G. (1923). Geschichte und Klassbewasstsein, Berlin: Malik Verlag. Trans. 1971 Livingstone, R., History and Class Consciousness Studies in Marxist Dialectics, London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1910). A lélek és a formák, Budapest: Franklin. Trans. 1974 Bostock, A., Soul and FormCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1916). Die Theorie des Romans, Berlin: Paul Cassirer. Trans. Bostock, A. 1978 The Theory of the Noval, London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1920). Die Theorie des Romans, Berlin: Paul Cassirer. Trans. 1971 Bostock, A., Theory of the NovelCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1923). Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein: Studien über Marxistische Dialektik, Berlin: Malik Verlag. Trans. 1971 Livingstone, R., History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist DialecticsCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1924). Lenin: Studie über den Zusammenhang seiner Gedanken, Berlin: Malik Verlag. Trans. 1971 Jacobs, N., Lenin: A Study on the Unity of His ThoughtCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg, (1923). Geschichte und Klassbewusstsein, Frankfurt: Malik Verlag. Trans. 1971 Livingstone, R., History and Class Consciousness, London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. and Tarski, A. (1930). ‘Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkül’ in Comptes rendus de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, cl. Iii, 23, 1–21. Trans. 1956 Woodger, J. H., ‘Investigations into the Sentential Calculus’ in Tarski, A. (1956), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. New edn Corcoran, J. (ed.), 1983, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1907). ‘Logika a psychologia’ (‘Logic and Psychology’), Przeglad Filozoficzny, 10, 489–92.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1909). ‘O prawdopodobieństwie wniosków indukcyjnych’ (‘On Probability of Inductive Conclusions’), Przeglad Filozoficzny, 12, 209–10.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1910). O zasadzie sprzeczności u Arystotelesa (On the Principle of Contradiction in Aristotle), Cracow: PAU. New edn 1987, ed. Woleński, J., Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1913). Die logische Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Cracow. Trans. 1970 Wojtasiewicz, O., ‘Logical Foundations of Probability Theory’ in Łukasiewicz, J., Selected Works, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1970: 16–63.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1920). ‘O logice trójartościowej’, Ruch filozoficzny, 5, 170–1. Trans. 1970 Wojtasiewicz, O., ‘On Three-Valued logic’ in Łukasiewicz, J., Selected Works, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1970, 87–8.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1922). ‘O determinizmie’ in his (1961) Z zagadnień logiki i filozofi, Warsaw: PWN. Trans. 1967 Jordan, Z.On Determinism’ in McCall, S., Polish Logic 1920–1939, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 19–39.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1951). Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1957). Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1970). Selected Works, ed. Borkowski, L., Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers and Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. (1930). ‘Philosophische Bemerkungen zu mehrwertigen System des Aussagenkalküls’, Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, 23: cl. III, 51–77. Trans. 1970 Weber, H., ‘Philosophical Remarks on Many-valued Systems of Propositional Logic’ in Lukasiewicz, J., Selected Works, ed. Borkowski, L., Amsterdam: North-Holland, 153–78.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. (1953). ‘A System of Modal Logic’, The Journal of Computing Systems 1: 111–49Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. (1970). Selected Works, ed. Borkowski, L., Amsterdam and Warsaw: North Holland and PWN.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1973). Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Luschei, E. (1962). The Logical Systems of Leśniewski, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
MacColl, H. (1877–80). ‘The Calculus of Equivalent Statements’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 9 (1877–8): 9–10, 177–86; 10 (1878–9): 16–28; 11 (1879–80): 113–21.Google Scholar
MacCorquodale, K. and Meehl, P. E. (1948). ‘On a Distinction between Hypothetical Constructs and Intervening Variables’, Psychological Review 55: 95–107 Repr. 1953, ‘Hypothetical Constructs and Intervening Variables’ in Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M., Readings in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 596–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mach, E. (1872). Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit, Leipzig: G. Fischer. Trans. 1910 Jourdain, P. E. B., The History and the Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt, Leipzig: Brockhaus. Trans. 1893 McCormack, T., The Science of Mechanics, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt, Leipzig: G. Fischer. Trans. 1960 Mc.Cormack, T. J., The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1886 [1906]). Die Analyse der Empfindungen, 5th edn, Jena. Trans. 1914 Williams, C. M. and Waterlow, J., The Analysis of Sensations, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1886). Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen, Jena. Trans. 1914 Williams, C., Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1886). Die Analyse der Empfindungen, Leipzig: G. Fischer. Trans. 1959 Williams, C. M. and Waterlow, S., The Analysis of Sensations, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1903). Populär-wissenschaftliche Vorlesungen, 3rd edn, Leipzig: J. A. Barth. Originally published in English trans. 1894 McCormack, T. J., Popular Scientific Lectures, Chicago: Open Court.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mach, E. (1905). Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung, Leipzig: J. Barth. Trans. 1976 Mc.Cormack, T. J. and Foulkes, P., Knowledge and Error – Sketches on the Psychology of Inquiry, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1912). Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt, 7th edn, Leipzig: Brockhaus. Trans. 1919 McCormack, T. J., Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development, 4th edn, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1946). ‘A Refutation of Morals’, Australian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 24: 77f.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. M. (1940). ‘What is a Metaphysical Statement?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XLI.Google Scholar
MacNeill, J.-J. (1966). The Blondelian Synthesis: A Study of the Influence of German Philosophy Sources on the Formation of Blondel’s Method and Thought, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
MacNiven, D. (1987) Bradley’s Moral Psychology, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Magee, Brian (1983). The Philosophy of Schopenhauer, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Magnus, B. (1978). Nietzsche’s Existential Imperative, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Magnus, B. and Higgins, K.M. (eds.) (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, Bernd (1978). Nietzsche’s Existential Imperative, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Eternal Recurrence as ‘countermyth’ to Christianity.Google Scholar
Mahlmann, Theodor (1962). ‘Das Axiom des Erlebnisses bei Wilhelm Herrmann’ (The Principle of Experiences in Wilhelm Herrmann), Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 6, 70–107.Google Scholar
Maier, C. (1975). Recasting Bourgeois Europe: Stabilization in France, Germany and Italy in the Decade After the First World WarPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maihofer, W. (ed.) (1962). Naturrecht oder Rechtspositivismus? (Natural Law or Legal Positivism?), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Maine, H. (1861). Ancient Law, London: Murray, J.. Repr. 1963, preface by Firth, Raymond, introduction and notes by Pollock, Frederick, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Maine, H. (1875). Lectures on the Early History of Institutions, London: J. Murray. Repr. 1888, London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Mainzer, K. (1994). ‘Philosophie und Geschichte von Raum und Zeit’, in Ausdretsch, J. and Mainzer, K. (eds.), Philosophie und Physik der Raum-Zeit, Zurich: Bibliographische Institut, 11–51.Google Scholar
Maire, G. (1935). Bergson mon maître, Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Makkreel, R. A. (1975). Dilthey, Philosopher of the Human Studies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Malamet, D. (1997). ‘Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaneity’, Noûs 11: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1958). Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malefijt, A. W. (1974). Images of Man, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1929). The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1944). A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays, Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
Maloney, J. (1985). Marshall, Orthodoxy, and the Professionalisation of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mancosu, P. (ed.) (1998). From Brouwer to Hilbert: The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, M. (1971). History, Man & Reason: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Thought, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Mander, W. J. (1994) An Introduction to Bradley’s Metaphysics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Thomas (1924). Der Zauberberg, in Gesammelte Werke, 13 vols, vol. III (1960), Frankfurt on Main: Fischer Verlag. Trans. 1960 Lowe-Porter, H. T., The Magic Mountain, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1929). Ideologie und Utopie, Bonn: Friedrich Cohen. Trans. 1936 Wirth, L. and Shils, E., Ideology and Utopia, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1984). Konservatismus, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1986 Kettler, D., Meja, V., and King, E. R., Conservatism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mansel, H. L. (1856) A Lecture on the Philosophy of Kant, London: John Henry and James Parker. Reprinted 1873 in Mansel, H. L. (ed. Chandler, H.W.), Letters, Lectures and Reviews, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Manser, A. (1982) Bradley’s Logic, Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Manser, A. and Stock, G. (eds.) (1984) The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Manser, Anthony and Stock, Guy (eds.) (1984). The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marcel, G. (1945) La Métaphysique de Royce, Paris: Aubier, Editions Montaigne. Trans. 1956 Ringer, V. and Ringer, G., Royce’s Metaphysics, Chicago: H. Regnery.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel (1927). Journal Métaphysique, Paris: Gallimard. Trans. 1952 Wall, G., Metaphysical Journal, London: Rockcliff.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel (1935). Etre et Avoir, Paris: Aubier. Trans. 1949 Farrer, K., Being and Having, London: Dacre Press.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel (1940). Du Refus à l'invocation, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel (1945a). Homo viator, Paris: Aubier. Trans. 1951 Craufurd, E., Homo Viator, London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel (1945b). La métaphysique de Royce (The Metaphysics of Royce). Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel (1951). Le Mystère de l'être, Paris, Aubier Trans. 1950 Fraser, G. S. and Hague, R., The Mystery of Being, London: Harvill Press.Google Scholar
Maréchal, J. (1923–49). Le point de départ de la métaphysique, Bruges.Google Scholar
Marías, J. (1962). Ortega. I. Circunstancia y vocación (Ortega. I. Circumstance and Vocation), Madrid: Revista de Occidente.Google Scholar
Marías, J. (1983). Ortega. II. Las trayectorias (Ortega. II. The Trajectories), Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Mariátegui, J. C. (1928). Siete ensayos sobre la realidad peruana (Seven Essays on Peruvian Reality). Obras Completas (Complete Works) (1969), vol. II. Lima: Empresa Editora Amauta.Google Scholar
Mariátegui, J. C. (Neira, H. ed.) (1973). José Carlos Mariátegui en sus textos (José Carlos Mariátegui in his Essays). Lima: PEISA. Biblioteca Peruana.Google Scholar
Marion, M. (2000). ‘Oxford Realism: Knowledge and Perception’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8–9: 299–338, 485–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1914). La philosophie bergsonienne: études critiques, Paris: Marcel Rivière, New edn, Paris: Téqui, 1927.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1920). Art et scolastique, Paris: Art catholique. New edn 1927.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1930). Le Docteur angélique, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer. Trans. 1931 Scamlan, J. F., St. Thomas Aquinas: Angel of the Schools, London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1932a). De la philosophie chrétienne, Milan: Rivista de neo–scolastica.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1932b). Les degrés du savoir: distinguer pour unir, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1934). Sept leçons sur l–Etre et les premiers principes de la raison spéculative, Paris: Téqui.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1935). Science et sagesse, Paris: Labergerie Trans. 1940 Wall, B. J., Science and Wisdom, London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1936). L'Humanisme intégral, Paris: Aubier, 1936.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1939). Quatre essais sur l'esprit dans sa condition charnelle, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer. New edn 1956, Paris: Alsatia.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1942). Saint Thomas and the problem of Evil, Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1944). De Bergson à Thomas d'Aquin, New York: Editions de la Maison Française.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1947). Court traité de l'existence et de l'existant, Paris: P. Hartmann. Trans. 1987 Galantiere, L. and Phelan, G. B., Existence and the existent, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Maritain, R. (1949a). Jacques Maritain, son oeuvre philosophique, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Maritain, R. (1949b). Les grandes amitiés, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1890 [1920]). Principles of Economics, 8th edn, London: Macmillan. Repr. edn. 1979, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce (1963). The Month of the Falling Leaves, London: Constable.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich (1975–98). Collected Works, 47 vols., London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1871). The Civil War in France, London. Repr. in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Collected Works, London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Masson, D. (1865) Recent British Philosophy, London: Macmillan. 3rd edn 1877.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1867). The Physiology and Pathology of the Mind, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1876). The Physiology of Mind, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. C. (1873). ‘Does the Progress of Physical Science Tend to Give Any Advantage to the Opinion of Necessity (or Determinism) over that of the Contingency of Events and the Freedom of the Will’ in Campbell, L. and Garnett, W. 1882, The Life of James Clerk Maxwell, London, 434–44.Google Scholar
McAlister, L. L. (ed.) (1976). The Philosophy of Brentano, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
McBriar, A. M. (1987) An Edwardian Mixed Doubles: The Bosanquets and the Webbs, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McCall, S. (ed.) (1967). Polish Logic 1920–1939, Papers by Ajdukiewicz, , Chwistek, , Jaśkowski, , Jordan, , Leśniewski, , Łukasiewicz, , SŁupecki, , Sobociński, , and Wajsberg, , Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Gerald D. (1986). The Ethics of Belief Debate, Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. (1997). Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as TechnologyCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCosh, J. (1886). Psychology: The Cognitive Powers, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1905). Physiological Psychology, London: Dent.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1911). Body and Mind: A History and a Defense of Animism, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1912). Psychology: The Study of Behavior, New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. H. (1982). ‘Criteria, Defeasibility and Knowledge’, Proceedings of the British Academy 68: 455–80Google Scholar
McDowell, J. H. (1998). ‘Intentionality and Interiority in Wittgenstein’ in Mind, Value and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. E. (1997). Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGuinness, B. (1985). Zurück zu Schlick. Eine Neubewertung von Werk und Wirkung (Back to Schlick. A New Evaluation of his Work and Influence), Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. P. (1992). ‘Epiphenomenalism’ in Guttenplan, S. (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Blackwell, 277–88.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. P. (1992). ‘The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism’ in Beckermann, A. et al. (eds.) (1992), 49–93.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. P. (1997). ‘Emergence and Supervenience’, Intellectica 25: 25–43Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. P. (1999). ‘Emergentism’ in Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C., The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT, 267–8.Google Scholar
McManus, D. (1995). ‘Philosophy in Question: Philosophical Investigations 133’, Philosophical Investigations 18: 4348–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1908). ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind 17, 457–74. Reprinted 1934 Philosophical Studies, London: Edward Arnold, 110–31.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1921–7). The Nature of Existence, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1921, 1927). The Nature of Existence, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert (1934). Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert (1938). The Philosophy of the Act, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert (1959). The Philosophy of the Present, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa, New York: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (1995). Conceptualizing the State: Innovation and Dispute in British Political Thought 1880–1914, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinong, A. (1894). Psychologisch-ethische Untersuchungen zur Werttheorie. Graz: Leuschner & Lubensky. Repr. 1968 in Haller, R. and Kindinger, R. (eds.), Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, vol. III, Abhandlungen zur Werttheorie, Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, pp. 1–244.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1899). ‘Über Gegenstände höherer Ordnung und deren Verhältnis zur inneren Wahrnehmung’ (‘Objects of higher order and their relation to inner perception’) in Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 21, 182–272.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1902). Über Annahmen, Leipzig: Barth. 2nd edn 1910. Trans. 1983 Heanue, J., On Assumptions, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1904). ‘Über Gegenstandstheorie’ in Meinong, A. (ed.), Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, Leipzig: Barth. Trans. 1960 by Chisholm, R., ‘The Theory of Objects’ in Chisholm, R. (ed.), Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 76–117.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1915). ÜberMöglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit (On Possibility and Probability), Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1917). ‘Über emotionale Präsentation’, Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der Kaiserlichem Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, no. 183, 2. Abhandlung. Repr. 1968 in Haller, R. and Kindinger, R. (eds.), Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, vol. III, Abhandlungen zur Werttheorie, Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 285–465. Transl. 1972, Meinong, A. (Kalsi, M.-L. Schubert, ed.), On Emotional Presentations, Evanston: North western University Press.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1923). Zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Werttheorie, Graz: Leuschner & Lubensky. Repr. 1968 in Haller, R. and Kindinger, R. (eds.), Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, vol. III, Abhandlungen zur Werttheorie, Graz: Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstalt, 471–656.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1965). Philosophenbriefe (Philosophical Correspondence), Graz: Akademische Druckund Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1871). Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Trans. 1976 Dingwall, J. and Hoselitz, B. F., Principles of Economics, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mercier, C. (1888). The Nervous System and the Mind: A Treatise on the Dynamics of the Human Organism, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mercier, D. (1923). Critériologie Générale ou Théorie Générale de la Certitude, 8th edn, Louvain: Institut supérieur de philosophie and Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Merker, B. (1988). Selbsttäuschung und Selbsterkenntnis: Zu Heideggers Transformation der Phänomenologie Husserls, Frankfurt on Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Merkl, A. J. (1917). Das Recht im Lichte seiner Anwendung (The Law in Light of its Application), Hanover: Helwing.Google Scholar
Merkl, A. J. (1931). ‘Prolegomena einer Theorie des rechtlichen Stufenbaus’ (‘Prolegomena to a Theory of the Hierarchical Structure of the Law’) in Verdross, A. (ed.), Gesellschaft, Staat und Recht. Untersuchungen zur Reinen Rechtslehre. Festschrift Hans Kelsen zum 50. Geburtstage gewidmet (Society, State, and the Law. Investigations into the Pure Theory of Law. Festschrift Dedicated to Hans Kelsen on his Fiftieth Birthday), Vienna: Springer Verlag, 252–94.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1942). La Structure de comportement, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Trans. 1963 Fisher, A., The Structure of Behavior, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris: Gallimard. Trans. 1962 Smith, C.The Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1955). Les Aventures de la dialectique, Paris: Gallimard. Trans. 1974 Bien, J., Adventures of the Dialectic, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Metz, Rudolph (1938). A Hundred Years of British Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Meyerson, E. (1908). Identité et Realité, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1930 Loewenberg, K., Identity and Reality, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meyerson, E. (1921). De l'explication dans les sciences, 2 vols. Paris: Payot. Trans. 1991 , D. A. and Sipfle, M.-A., Explanation in the Sciences, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 128, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Meyerson, E. (1925). La deduction rélativiste, Paris: Payot. Trans. 1985 Sipfle, D. A. and Sipfle, M.-A., The Relativistie Deduction, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 83, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Meyerson, E. (1929). ‘Explanation’, Encyclopedia Britannica, 14th edn, 984–5.Google Scholar
Meyerson, E. (1931). Du cheminement de la pensée (The Ways of Thought), 3 vols. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Meyerson, Emile (1931). Du Cheminement de la pensée, 3 vols. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Mikhailovksii, N. K. (1869) ‘Chto takoe Progress’ (‘What is Progress’). Trans. 1965 in Edie, J. M., Scanlan, J. P. and Zeldin, M.-B., Russian Philosophy, vol. II, Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 170–98.Google Scholar
Mikhailovksii, N. K. (1906–14). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii (Complete Works), St Peterburg: M. M. Stanisulevich, 4th edn. 10 vols.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1838). ‘Bentham’, London and Westminster Review. Repr. 1875 in Mill, J. S., Dissertations and Discussions, vol. I, London: Longmans, Green, 330–92.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, 5th edn 1862, London: John Parker.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, London: John Parker, Comprises vols. VII and VIII of Mill, J. S., Collected Works, ed. Robson, J. M., London: Routledge and Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic, London: Longmans, Green. 8th edn 1872.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, London: Parker. New edn 1965, Robson, J. M. (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. II–III, Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty, London: Parker. New edition 1977, ed. Robson, J. M., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. XVIII: Essays on Politics and Society, Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1865). An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, London: Longmans, Green; 5th edn 1878, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1865). Auguste Comte and Positivism, London, repr. 1961 Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1873). Autobiography, London: Longmans, Green. New edn 1981, Robson, J. M. (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. I, Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mill, J. (1869). Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind, new edn, 2 vols., London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar
Miller, David (1973). George Herbert Mead: Self, Language and the World, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. W. (1980). ‘Solipsism in the Tractatus’, Journal of the History of Ideas 18: 142–66Google Scholar
Milne, A. J. M. (1962). The Social Philosophy of English idealism, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Minden, Michael (ed.) (1995). Thomas Mann, London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Mink, L. (1969). Mind, History and Dialectic, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Minkowski, H. (1905). ‘Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet und seine Bedeutung für die heutige Mathematik [Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet and his Significance for Modern Mathematics]’, Jahresbericht der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 14: 149–63. Reprinted in Minkowski, H. (ed. Hilbert, D.), Gesammelte Abhandlungen [Collected Papers], vols. I and II, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1911, vol. II, 447–61.Google Scholar
Minkowski, H. (1909). ‘Raum und Zeit’, Physikalische Zeitschrift 10: 104–11.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (1989). More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (1973), Gravitation, San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. (1995). ‘The Development of Husserl’s Thought’ in Smith, and Smith, 1995, 45–77.Google Scholar
Mommsen, W. (1959). Max Weber und die deutsche Politik, 1890–1920, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. 1984 Steinberg, M., Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Monk, R. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Monk, R. (1996). Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. (1748). L'Esprit des Lois. Trans. 1966 Nugent, T., The Spirit of Laws. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Moore, F. C. T. (1996). Bergson: Thinking Backwards, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1899). ‘The Nature of Judgement’, Mind 8: 176–93 Repr. 1993 in Moore, G. E. (ed. Baldwin, T.), Selected Writings, London: Routledge, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1899). ‘The Nature of Judgment’, Mind n.s. 5: 176–93 Repr. 1993 in Moore, G. E. (ed. Baldwin, T.), Selected Writings, London: Routledge, 1–19.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903). ‘The Refutation of Idealism’, Mind 12, 433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903a). Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New edition 1993, Baldwin, T. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903b). ‘Review of Franz Brentano, The Origins of the Knowledge of Right and Wrong (Engl. translation by Cecil Hague, Westminster, 1902)’, International Journal of Ethics 14: 115–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1909). ‘The Subject-Matter of Psychology’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 10: 36–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1912). Ethics, London: Home University Library.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1914). ‘The Status of Sense-Data’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 14: 355–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1922). ‘The Conception of Intrinsic Value’ in Moore, G. E., Philosophical Studies, London: Routledge, 253–75. Repr. 1993 in Moore, G. E. (Baldwin, T., ed.), Principia Ethica, 280–98.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1925). ‘A Defence of Common-Sense’ in Contemporary British Philosophy, 2nd series, ed. Muirhead, J. H., London: George Allen and Unwin. Repr. 1959 in Philosophical Papers, London: George Allen and Unwin and in 1993 Selected Writings, ed. Baldwin, T., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1939). ‘Proof of an External World’, Proceedings of the British Academy 25: 273–300 Repr. 1959 in Philosophical Papers, London: George Allen and Unwin and in 1993, Selected Writings, ed. Baldwin, T., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1942). ‘A Reply to my Critics: 10. Subjectivity of sense-data’, in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 653–60.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1952). ‘A Reply to my Critics’ in Schilpp, P. A. ed., The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, New York: Tudor Publishing Co., 533–677.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1953). Some Main Problems of Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1954). ‘Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 1929–33’, Mind 63: 1–15, 289–316, and (1955) Mind 64, 1–27.Google Scholar
Moore, G. H. (1982). Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice: Its Origins, Development and Influence. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morán, G. (1998). El maestro en el erial: Ortega y Gasset y la cultura del franquismo (The Master in the Uncultivated Land: Ortega y Gasset and the Culture of Franquism), Barcelona: Tusquets.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. Lloyd (1891). Animal Life and Intelligence, Boston: Ginn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. Lloyd (1912). Instinct and Experience, London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. Lloyd (1923). Emergent Evolution, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. H. (1870). Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity in the Human Family, Washington DC: The Smithsonian Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (1990). The History of Econometric Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. R. (1926). ‘The Notion of Emergence’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. VI, 49–55.Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1937). Logical Positivism, Pragmatism and Scientific Empiricism, Paris: Hermann et Cie.Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1938). ‘Foundations of the Theory of Signs’ in Neurath, O., Carnap, R. and Morris, Charles (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. I, no. 2, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1–59.Google Scholar
Morris, William (1891). News from Nowhere, London: Reeves and Turner. Repr. 1995 ed. Kumar, K., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, William (1910–15). The Collected Works of William Morris, ed. Morris, May, London.Google Scholar
Morscher, E. (1986). ‘Propositions and States of Affairs in Austrian Philosophy before Wittgenstein’in Nyiri, J. C. (ed.), From Bolzano to Wittgenstein: The Tradition of Austrian Philosophy, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 75–85.Google Scholar
Mosca, G. (1923). Elementi di scienza politica, 2nd edn, Turin: Fratelli Bocca. Trans. 1939 Kahn, Hannah D., The Ruling Class, ed. Livingston, A., New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mostowski, A. (1948). Logika matematyczna (Mathematical Logic), Warsaw: Monografie Matematyczne.Google Scholar
Mostowski, A. (1967). ‘Tarski, Alfred’ in Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. VIII, New York: Macmillan, 77–81.Google Scholar
Mostowski, A. (1979). ‘Foundational Studies’, Selected Works, vols. I–II, Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers and Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Moulines, C. U. (1991). ‘Making Sense of Carnap’s Aufbau’, Erkenntnis 35: 263–86Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1908). The Service of the State: Four Lectures on the Political Teaching of T. H. Green, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1915). German Philosophy in Relation to the War, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1931) The Platonic Tradition in Anglo-Saxon Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (ed.) (1935). Bernard Bosanquet and His Friends: Letters Illustrating the Sources and the Development of His Philosophical Opinions, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. (1990). On Being in the World, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. and Pilzecker, A. (1900). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtnis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, Ergänzungsband 1, Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. (1878). Zur Grundlegung der Psychophysik, Berlin: Grieben.Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. (1904). Die Gesichtspunkte und die Tatsachen der psychophysischen Methodik, Wiesbaden: Bergmann.Google Scholar
Mulligan, K., Simons, P. M., and Smith, B. (1984). ‘Truth-Makers’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44: 287–321.Google Scholar
Mulligan, K. (ed.) (1987). Speech Act and Sachverhalt. Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology, Dordrecht, Boston and Lancaster: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münsterberg, H., Ribot, T., Janet, P., Jastrow, J., Hart, B., and Prince, M. (1911). Subconscious Phenomena, London: Rebman. Reprinted in part from Journal of Abnormal Psychology (1907–8), 2, 22–43 and 58–80 (‘A Symposium on the Subconscious’).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murchison, C. (ed.) (1926). Psychologies of 1925: Powell Lectures in Psychological Theory, Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murchison, C. (ed.) (1930). Psychologies of 1930, Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, Iris (1953). Sartre: Romantic Rationalist, Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes. Reprinted, with a new introduction, 1989, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mure, G. R. G. (1958). Retreat From Truth, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mure, G. R. G. (1978). Idealist Epilogue, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murphey, M. (1961). The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reissued 1993, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Murray, D. (1983). A History of Western Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Myers, F. (1892). ‘The subliminal consciousness’, Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research 7: 298–355.Google Scholar
Myers, F. (1903). Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily Death, 2 vols., London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Myers, G. E. (1986). William James: His Life and Thought, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Gerald E. (1986). William James: His Life and Thought, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. (1939). ‘The Formation of Modern Conceptions of Formal Logic in the Development of Geometry’, Osiris 7: 142–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. (1951). ‘Mechanist Biology and Organismic Biology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2: 327–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Natanson, M. (1986). Anonymity: A Study in the Philosophy of Alfred Schütz, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1902). Platons Ideenlehre (Plato’s Doctrine of Ideas). Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1912). ‘Kant und die Marburger Schule’ (‘Kant and the Marburg School’), Kant-Studien 17: 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naucho, F. (1966) Berdiaev’s Philosophy: The Existential Paradox of Freedom and Necessity, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1985). Nietzsche: Life as Literature, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander (1985). Nietzsche: Life as Literature, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. (1930). ‘Über das Sogennante Erkenntnisproblem’ (‘On the So-called Problem of Knowledge’), Abhandlungen der Fries’schen Schule, n.s. 1: 444–6Google Scholar
Nelson, L. (1965). ‘The Impossibility of the “Theory of Knowledge”’, English trans. in Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy, Selected Essays by Brown, T. K. III, foreword by Blanshard, B., introd. by Kraft, J., New York: Dover, 185–205.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. (1971). Progress and Regress in Philosophy, From Hume and Kant to Hegel and Fries, ed. Kraft, Julius, English trans. Palmer, Humphrey, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nemeth, E. and Stadler, F. (1996). Encyclopedia and Utopia: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath (1882–1945), Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Nemeth, E. (1981). Otto Neurath und der Wiener Kreis, Wissenschaftlichkeit als revolutionärer politischer Anspruch (Scientific Status as Revolutionary Politics), Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Nettleship, R. L. (1888) ‘Memoir’ in Green, T. H. (ed. Nettleship, R. L.), The Works of Thomas Hill Green, vol. III, London: Longmans, Green, XI–CLXI.Google Scholar
Neurath, O., Carnap, R., and Hahn, H. (1929). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis, Vienna: Wolf. Trans. 1973 Foulkes, P. and Neurath, M., ‘Scientific World Conception. The Vienna Circle’ in Neurath, O. (ed. Neurath, M. and Cohen, R. S.), Empiricism and Sociology, Dordrecht: Reidel, 299–318.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1910). ‘Zur Theorie der Sozialwissenschaften’, Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 34, 37–67. Repr. 1981, ed. Haller, R. and Rütte, H., Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften, Vienna: Hölder, Pichler, Tempsky, 23–46.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1913–46). Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Trans. and ed. 1983 Cohen, R. and Neurath, M., Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1931). Empirische Soziologie, Vienna: Springer. Partial Trans. 1973 Foulkes, P. and Neurath, M., ‘Empirical Sociology’ in Neurath, O. (ed. Neurath, M. and Cohen, R. S.), Empiricism and Sociology, Dordrecht: Reidel, 319–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, O. (1932). ‘Protocolsätze’, Erkenntnes 3: 204–14 Transl. in Neurath, (1913–46).Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1933). Einheitswissenschaft und Psychologie, Vienna: Gerold. Trans. 1987 Kraal, H., ‘Unified Science and Psychology’ in McGuinness, B. (ed.), The Unity of Science, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–23.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1944). Foundations of the Social Sciences, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. II, no. 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1983). Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, ed. Cohen, R. S. and Neurath, M., Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, Otto (1932). ‘Protokolsätze’, Erkenntnis 3: 204–14 Trans. 1959 ‘Protocol Sentences’ in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), Logical Positivism, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 199–207.Google Scholar
Neurath, P. and Nemeth, E. (1994). Otto Neurath oder die Einheit von Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft (Otto Neurath or the Unity of Science and Society). Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S. (1886). Principles of Political Economy, New York: Harper & Bros. Repr. edn 1966, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. (1845). An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, London: James Toovey. New edn 1989, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. (1852). Discourses on the Scope and Nature of University Education: Addressed to the Catholics of Dublin, Dublin. New edn 1976, Ker, I. T. (ed.), The Idea of a University, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. (1864). Apologia Pro Vita Sua, London: Longmans. New edn 1967, Svaglic, Martin J. (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. (1870). An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent, London: Burns, Oates, and Co. New edn 1985, Ker, I. T. (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, P. P. (1978) ‘A Bibliography of the Writings of Bernard Bosanquet (1848–1923)’, Idealistic Studies, 8: 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, P. P. (1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists: Selected Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P. (1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. W. (1887). Zur Genealogie der Moral: Eine Streitschrift, Leipzig: C. G. Naumannn. Trans. 1967 Kaufmann, W. and Hollingdale, R. J., On the Genealogy of Morals, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1878–80). Menschliches, Allzumenschliches, Chemnitz: E. Schmeitzner. Trans. 1986 Hollingdale, R. J., Human, All Too Human, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1881). Die Morgenröte, Chemnitz: E. Schmeitzne. Trans. 1982 Hollingdale, R. J., Daybreak, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1882). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, Chemnitz: E. Schmeitzner. Trans. 1974 Kaufmann, W., The Gay Science, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1883–5). Also sprach Zarathustra, Chemnitz: E. Schmeitzner. Trans. 1961 Hollingdale, R. J., Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1886). Jenseits von Gut und Böse, Leipzig: C. G. Naumann. Trans. 1973 Hollingdale, R. J., Beyond Good and Evil, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1887). Zur Genealogie der Moral, Leipzig: C. G.Naumann. Trans. 1969 Kaufmann, W. and Hollingdale, R. J., On the Genealogy of Morals, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1889).Götzen-Dämmerung, Leipzig: C. G. Naumann. Trans. 1968 Hollingdale, R. J., Twilight of the Idols, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1901). Nachgelassene Werke: Der Wille zur Macht, vol. XV, Leipzig: C. G.Naumann. Trans. 1967 Kaufmann, W., The Will to Power, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1908). Ecce homo, Leipzig: Insel-Verlag. Trans. 1979 Hollingdale, R. J., Ecce Homo, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1980). Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. Colli, G. and Montinari, M., Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1986). Sämtliche Briefe: Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. Colli, G. and Montinari, M., Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1872). Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik (after 1886: Die Geburt der Tragödie, oder Griechentum und Pessimismus), Leipzig: E. W. Fritzsch. English translation 1867 by Kaufmann, Walter, The Birth of Tragedy, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1882). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. Trans. 1974 Kaufmann, Walter, The Gay Science, New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1883–5). Also sprach Zarathustra. Trans. 1961 Hollingdale, R. J., Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1886). Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Trans. 1966 Kaufmann, Walter, Beyond Good and Evil, New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1886). Jenseits von Gut und Böse, Leipzig: C. G. Naumann; English translation 1973 by Hollingdale, R. J., Beyond Good and Evil, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1887). Zur Genealogie der Moral. Trans. 1968 Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J., On the Genealogy of Morals, New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1889). Die Götzen-Dämmerung. Trans. 1968 Hollingdale, R. J., The Twilight of the Idols, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1895). Der Antichrist. Trans. 1968 Hollingdale, R. J., The Anti-Christ, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1906). Der Wille zur Macht. A collection of Nietzsche’s outlines and notes of 1883–8 selected and arranged by editors. Trans. 1967 Kaufmann, WalterThe Will to Power, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1908). Ecce Homo. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter, Ecce Homo, New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967–84). Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Complete Critical Works), ed. Colli, G. and Montinari, J., Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nishida, Kitarō (1911). Zen no kenkyū, Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. Trans. 1992 Abe, Masao and Ives, Christover, An Inquiry into the Good, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nishida, Kitarō (1927). Hataraku mono kara miru mono e (From the Acting to the Seeing), Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Nishida, Kitarō (1929). Ippansha no jikakuteki taikei (The Self-Conscious System of the Universal), Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Nishida, Kitarō (1934). Tetsugaku no kompon mondai, Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. Trans. 1970 Dilworth, David A., Fundamental Problems of Philosophy, Tokyo: Sophia University Press.Google Scholar
Nishitani, Keiji (1985). Nishida Kitarō: sono hito to shisō, Tokyo: Chikuma Shobõ. Trans. 1991 Seisaku, Yamamoto and Heisig, James W., Nishida Kitarō, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Norton, J. D. (1989). ‘How Einstein Found his Field Equations’ in Howard, D. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser, 101–59.Google Scholar
Norton, J. D. (1993). ‘General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute’, Reports on Progress in Physics 56: 791–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novgorodstev, P. N. (ed.) (1903) Problemy idealizma (Problems of idealism), Moscow: Moskovskoe psikhologicheskoe obshchestvo.Google Scholar
Nozick, M. (1971). Miguel de Unamuno, New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1973). Theories of the Proposition. Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, Amsterdam and London: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Oakes, G. (1988). Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oberdan, T. (1993). Protocols, Truth and Convention, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
O'Brien, L. F. (1996). ‘Solipsism and Self-Reference’, European Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 2: 175–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, J. M. (1979). ‘The Crisis in Experimentalism in the 1920s: E. G. Boring and His Uses of History’, American Psychologist 34: 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of The Influence of Language upon Thought and of The Science of Symbolism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ohashi, Ryōsuke (ed.) (1990). Die Philosophie der Kyôto Schule: Texte und Einführung, Munich and Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, K. (1953). ‘Editor’s Preface’ in Hägerström, A., Inquiries into the Nature of Law and Morals, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, x–xxvi.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, K. (1971). Law as Fact, 2nd edn, London: Steven and Sons.Google Scholar
Ollig, H.-L. (1979). Der neu-Kantianismus (Neo-Kantianism), Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Olmedo, M. (1965). El pensamiento de Ganivet (The Thought of Ganivet), Madrid: Revista de Occidente and Granada: Diputación Provincial, 1998.Google Scholar
O'Neil, W. M. (1995). ‘American Behaviorism: A Historical and Critical Analysis’, Theory & Psychology 5: 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, F. M. (1980). Royce’s Voyage Down Under: A Journey of the Mind, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Orringer, N. (1979). Ortega y sus fuentes germánicas (Ortega and his German Sources)Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Orringer, N. (1985). Unamuno y los protestantes liberales (Unamuno and Liberal Protestants), Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Ors, E. d' (1911). La ben plantada (The Good-Looking Wife), Barcelona: Lib. Alvar Verdaguer and Ed. Selecta Catalònia, 1980.Google Scholar
Ors, E. d' (1947). El secreto de la filosofía (The Secret of Philosophy), Madrid: Editorial Iberia; new repr. in Madrid: Tecnos, 1998.Google Scholar
Ors, E. d (1987–). Obra catalana d'Eugeni d'Ors (Complete Catalan Works), Madrid. Ediciones dels Quaderns Crema, 15 vols. (incomplete).Google Scholar
Orstertag, G. (ed.) (1998). Definite Descriptions. A Reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1914). Meditaciones del Quijote, Madrid: Ediciones de la Residencia de Estudiantes; Meditations on Quixote, New York: Norton, 1961.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1921). España invertebrada, Madrid: Espasa Calpe; Invertebrate Spain, London: George Allen and Unwin and New York: Norton, 1937.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1923). El tema de nuestro tiempo, Madrid: Espasa Calpe; The Modern Theme, London: C. W. Daniel, 1931 and New York: Norton, 1933, repr. 1961.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1929). La rebelión de las masas, Madrid: Revista de Occidente, 1929; The Revolt of the Masses, London: George Allen and Unwin and New York: Norton, 1932.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1935). Historia como sistema: Del Imperio Romano, Madrid: Revista de Occidente. Trans. 1941 Weyl, H. and Attenson, W., ‘History as System’ in Philosophy and History, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1946–83). Obras completas (Complete Works), Madrid: Revista de Occidente, vols. I–XI, 1946–69; Madrid: Alianza Editorial, vols. I–XII, 1983.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1957). El hombre y la gente, Madrid: Revista de Occidente, 1957; Man and People, New York: Norton, 1957.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1958). La idea de principio en Leibniz y la evoluicón de la teoría deductiva, Madrid: Revista de Occidente. The Idea of Principle in Leibniz and the Evolution of Deductive Theory, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1958). Prólogo para alemanes, Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1959). En torno a Galileo, Madrid: Revista de Occidente; Man and Crisis, New York: Norton, 1958; London: George Allen and Unwin, 1959.Google Scholar
Orth, E. W. and Holzhey, H. (1994). Neu-Kantianismus (Neo-Kantianism), Würzburg: Könighausen and Neumann.Google Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1908). Grundriβ der Naturphilosophie (Outline of Natural Philosophy), Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1937). L'Energie (Energy), Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Ott, H. (1988). Martin Heidegger: Unterwegs zu seiner Biographie, Frankfurt on Main: Campus Trans 1994 Blunden, A., Martin Heidegger: A Political Life, London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Ott, H. (1993). Martin Heidegger: The Political Life, London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Otter, S. den (1996). British Idealism and Social Explanation: A Study in Late Victorian Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pailin, D. (1986). Groundwork of Philosophy of Religion, London: Epworth.Google Scholar
Pais, A. (1982). ‘Subtle is the Lord’: The Life and Science of Albert Einstein, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papini, G. (1913). Pragmatismo (Pragmatism), Milan: Libreria Editrice Milanese.Google Scholar
Pappas, G. S. (1995). ‘Mechanism’ in Kim, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.), A Companion to Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell, 304–5.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1902–3). Les systèmes socialistes, 2 vols. Paris: V. Girard and E. Brière.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1909). Manuel d'économie politique, Paris: Giard & Brière.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1916). Trattato di sociologia generale, 2 vols., Florence: Barbera. Trans. 1935 Livingston, A. and Bongiorno, A., The Mind and Society, 4 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1921). La trasformazione della democrazia, Milan: Carbaccio.Google Scholar
Pasch, M. (1882). Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie [Lectures on Recent Geometry], Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. A. (1957). A Hundred Years of Philosophy, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. (1957). A Hundred Years of Philosophy, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. (1978). A Hundred Years of Philosophy, Harmonsdworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter (1873). The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry (originally entitled Studies in the History of the Renaissance), London: Macmillan; modern edition, 1986, ed. Phillips, Adam, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter (1885). Marius the Epicurean: His Sensations and Ideas. London; modern edition, 1985, ed. Levey, Michael, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pater, Walter (1973). Essays on LIterature and Art, ed. Uglow, Jennifer. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. (1955). The Modern Predicament: A Study in the Philosophy of Religion, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Paty, M. (1993). Einstein Philosophe, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Paul, G. A. (1936). ‘Is there a Problem about Sense-Data?’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 15, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauli, W. (1981). Theory of Relativity, New York: Dover. 1st German edn 1921.Google Scholar
Paulsen, F. (1893). ‘Wesen und geschichtliche entwicklung der deutschen universitaten’ in Lexis, W. (ed.), Die deutschen universitaten, Berlin: A. Asher. Trans. 1895 Perry, E. D., The German Universities: Their Character and Historical Development.Google Scholar
Paulson, S. L. (1992). ‘The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12: 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, S. L. (1996). ‘Hans Kelsen’s Earliest Legal Theory: Critical Constructivism’, The Modern Law Review 59: 797–812. Repr. (with revisions) in Paulson, S. L. and Paulson, B. L. (eds.) (1998), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, S. L. (2003). ‘Legal Theory, 1870–1914’, chapter 23 in this volume.Google Scholar
Paulson, S. L. and Paulson, B. L. (eds.) (1998). Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pears, D. F. (1967). Bertrand Russell and the British Tradition in Philosophy, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pears, D. F. (1972). ‘Russell’s Logical Atomism’, in Pears, D. F. (ed.), Bertrand Russell: A Collection of Critical Essays, Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Pears, D. F. (1987). The False Prison, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pears, D. F. (1996). ‘The Originality of Wittgenstein’s Investigation of Solipsism’, European Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 2: 124–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1892). The Grammar of Science, London: Walter Scott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, S. J. (1996). The Economics of W. S. Jevons, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peel, J. D. Y. (1971). Herbert Spencer: The Evolution of a Sociologist, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1867). ‘On a New List of Categories’, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 7: 287–98. Repr. 1984 in Moore, E. C. (ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. II, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 49–59.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1868–9). The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, series. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2: 103–14, 140–57, 193–208. Repr. 1984 in Moore, E. C. et al. (eds.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. II, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 193–272.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1871). ‘Fraser’s The Works of George Berkeley,’, North American Review, 113: 449–72.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1877–8). ‘Illustrations of the Logic of Science’, Popular Science Monthly, 12: 1–15, 286–302, 604–15, 705–18; 13: 203–17, 470–82. Repr. 1986 in Kloesel, C. J. W. et al. (eds.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. III, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 242–374.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1891–3). The Monist series on metaphysics. The Monist, 1: 161–76; 2: 321–37; 2: 533–59; 3: 1–22; 3: 176–200. Repr. 1992 in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. I (1867–93), Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 285–371.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1892). Review of ‘The Grammar of Science’, Nation 55: 15.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1905–6). Monist papers on pragmaticism. The Monist, 15: 161–81; 481–99. Repr. 1998 with additional manuscript material in Peirce Edition Project (ed.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. II (1893–1913), Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 331–433.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1908). ‘A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God’, The Hibbert Journal, 7: 90–112. Repr. 1998 in Peirce Edition Project (ed.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. II (1893–1913), Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 434–50.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931–58). Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce, ed. Hortshorne, C., Weiss, P., and Burks, A., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931–68). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., ed. Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., and Books, A., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1933). ‘On an Improvement in Boole’s Calculus of Logic’ in Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., and Burks, A. W. (eds.), Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce, vol. III, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1934). ‘Lectures on Pragmatism’ in Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. V, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 13–131. Repr. 1998 as ‘Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism (1903)’ in Peirce Edition Project (ed.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. II (1893–1913), Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 133–241.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1958). ‘Josiah Royce, The Religious Aspect of Philosophy’, in Burks, A. (ed.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. VIII, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 39–53. Repr. 1993 as ‘An American Plato: Review of Royce’sReligious Aspect of Philosophy’, in Kloesel, C. J. W. et al. (eds.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. IV, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 221–34.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1992). Reasoning and the Logic of Things, ed. Ketner, K. L., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. Repr. 1984 in Moore, E. C. (ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. II, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 462–87.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1968). ‘Structure of Space-Time’, in DeWitt, C. M. and Wheeler, J. A. (eds.), Battelle Rencontres. 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, New York: Benjamin, 121–235.Google Scholar
Pepper, S. C. (1923). ‘Misconceptions Regarding Behaviorism’, The Journal of Philosophy 20: 242–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, S. (1926). ‘Emergence’, Journal of Philosophy 3: 241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perico, Y. (1991). Maurice Blondel: genèse du sens, Paris: Editions Universitaires.Google Scholar
Perry, R. B. (1909). ‘The Mind Within and the Mind Without’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6: 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, R. B. (1912). Present Philosophical Tendencies, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Perry, R. B. (1918). ‘Docility and Purposiveness’, Psychological Review 25: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, R. B. (1921a). ‘A Behavioristic View of Purpose’, Journal of Philosophy 18: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, R. B. (1921b). ‘The Cognitive Interest and its Refinements’, Journal of Philosophy 18: 365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Ralph Barton (1935). The Thought and Character of William James, 2 vols., Boston: Little, Brown. Both a biography and a study of James’s thought.Google Scholar
Petitot, J. (1992). ‘Actuality of Transcendental Aesthetics for Modern Physics’, in Boi, L. et al. (eds.), A Century of Geometry: Epistemology, History and Mathematics, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 239–63.Google Scholar
Pickering, Mary (1993). Auguste Comte: An Intellectual Biography, vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, W. S. F. (1984). Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1912). Wealth and Welfare, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, W. B. (1911). Essentials of Psychology, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Piovesana, Gino K. (1997). Recent Japanese Philosophical Thought 1862–1996: A Survey Including a New Survey by Naoshi Yamawaki ‘The Philosophical Thought of Japan from 1963–1996’, Richmond, Surrey: Japan Library (Curzon Press Ltd).Google Scholar
Plamenatz, J. P. (1938). Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation, London: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn 1968.Google Scholar
Plekhanov, G. V. (1969). Fundamental Problems of Marxism, London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Plekhanov, G. V. (1977). Selected Philosophical Works, 5 vols., Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Plourde, S. (1985). Vocabulaire philosophique de Gabriel Marcel, Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, O. (1983). Der Denkweg Martin Heideggers, Pfullingen: Max Neske. Trans. 1987 Margushak, D. and Barber, S., Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1889). Leçons sur la théorie mathématique de la lumière (Lessons on the Mathematical Theory of Light), Paris: G. Carré.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1891). ‘Les Géometries non-Euclidiennes [Non-Euclidean Geometries]’, Revue générale des sciences pures et appliquées 2: 769–74. Repr. with small alterations in Poincaré, 1902, 51–70 (English trans., 35–50).Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1902). La Science et l'hypothèse, Paris: Ernest Flammarion. (Latest repr., 1968.) Trans. 1905 , W. J. G., Science and Hypothesis, London: Walter Scott Publishing Co. Repr. New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1902). Science et l'hypothèse, Paris: Flammarion. Trans. 1905 Halsted, G. B., Science and Hypothesis, New York: Science Press.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1902a). ‘La valeur objective de la science’ (The Objective Value of Science), Revue de métaphysique 10: 265.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1902b). La Science et l'hypothèse, Paris: Flammarion. Trans. 1905 , W. J. G., Science and Hypothesis, London: Walter Scott Publishing Co. Repr. New York: Dover Publications, 1952.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1904). La Valeur de la science, Paris: Flammarion. Trans. 1907 by Halstead, G. B., The Value of Science, London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1906). ‘Sur la dynamique de l'électron’, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 21: 129–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1908). Science et méthode, Paris: Flammarion. Trans. 1914 Maitland, F., Science and Method, London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1909). ‘Le logique de l'infini [The Logic of the Infinite]’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 17: 462–82. Repr. in Poincaré, 1913, 7–31.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1912). Calcul des probabilités (The Probability Calculus), 2nd edn, Paris: Gauthier Villars.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1913). Dernières Pensées. Paris: Ernest Flammarion. Trans. Bolduc, J., Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Pollock, F. (1906). Maine, Ancient Law, with introduction and notes by Pollock, FrederickSir, London: J. Murray. Reprinted 1963, preface by Firth, Raymond, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, F. (1941). The Holmes-Pollock Correspondence, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pommier, Jean (1925). La pensée religieuse de Renan, Paris: F. Rieder.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1962). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson (1st edn 1934).Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1979). Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Post, E. L. (1921). ‘Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions’, American Journal of Mathematics 43: 163–85 Repr. in Heijenoort, 1967, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, R. (1907). ‘The Need of a Sociological Jurisprudence’, The Green Bag, 19: 607–15.Google Scholar
Pound, R. (1908–9). ‘Liberty of Contract’, Yale Law Journal, 18: 454–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, R. (1908). ‘Mechanical Jurisprudence’, Columbia Law Review, 8: 605–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, R. (1933–4). ‘Law and the Science of Law in Recent Theories’, Yale Law Journal 43: 525–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prezzolini, G. (1909). ‘Relazione del primo anno della Voce’, La Voce I: 1.Google Scholar
Price, H. H. (1932). Perception, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Price, H. H. (1969). Belief, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (1912). ‘Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?’, Mind 21: 21–37. Repr. in Prichard, 1968, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (1928). ‘Duty and Interest’; inaugural lecture, repr. in Prichard, 1968, 203–38.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (1932). ‘Duty and Ignorance of Fact’, Proceedings of the British Academy: 67–92; repr. with endnotes in Prichard, 1968, 18–39.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (1968). Moral Obligation and Duty and Interest: Essays and Lectures, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (1968). Moral Obligation, ed. Urmson, J. O., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. (1909). Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. (1950). Knowledge and Perception, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, M. (1906). The Dissociation of a Personality, New York and London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Prince, M. (1907–8). ‘Symposium on the subconscious’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2, 22–5 and 67–80. Reprinted in Münsterberg, et al. 1911.Google Scholar
Prince, M. (1914). The Unconscious: The Fundamentals of Human Personality Normal and Abnormal, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pringle-Pattison, A. Seth (1917). The Idea of God in Recent Philosophy, Gifford Lectures (1912–13), Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1976). The Doctrine of Propositions and Terms, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Proust, J. (1986). Questione de Forme: Logique et proposition analytique de Kant à Carnap, Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard. Trans. 1989 Brenner, A., Questions of Form: Logic and the Analytic Proposition from Kant to Carnap, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Quine, W. V. (1936). ‘Truth by Convention’ in Lee, O. H. (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead, New York: Longman, 90–124. Reprinted 1976 in Quine, W. V., The Ways of Paradox, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 77–106.Google Scholar
Proust, Marcel (1913–27). A la recherche du temps perdu. New edition 1987–9, ed. Tadié, Jean-Yves, 4 vols., Paris Gallimard (Pléiade). Trans. 1992 Moncrieff, C. K. Scott and Kilmartin, Terence, revised by Enright, D. J., In Search of Lost Time, 6 vols., London: Chatto and Windus. Repr. in paperback 1996, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Pucelle, J. (1960–5). La nature et l'esprit dans la philosophie de T. H. Green: La Renaissance de l'Idéalisme en Angleterre au XIXe siècle, 2 vols., Paris: Beatrice Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. A. (ed.) (1997). The Cambridge Companion to William James, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43. Repr. in Quine, W. V. O. (1961), From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1963). Set Theory and Its Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1974). Methods of Logic, 3rd edn, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1985). Time of My Life: An Autobiography, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1939). ‘Designation and Existence’, The Journal of Philosophy 36: 701–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1942). Mathematical Logic, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1947). ‘The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 12: 43–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1969). ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1992). Pursuit of Truth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli (1932). An Idealist View of Life, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rahner, K. (1939). Geist in Welt, Leipzig. Trans. 1968 Dych, W., Spirit in the World, London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1926). ‘The Foundations of Mathematics’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 25 (second series): 338–84. Reprinted 1978 in Ramsey, F. (ed. Mellor, H.), Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics, London: Routledge, 152–212.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1931). The Foundations of Mathematics, ed. Braithwaite, R. B., London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. (1931). ‘The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, ed. Braithwaite, R., London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Randall, J. H. Jr. (1966). ‘Idealistic Social Philosophy and Bernard Bosanquet’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24: 473–502 Repr. 1977 in Randall, (ed. Singer, B. J.), Philosophy After Darwin: Chapters for the Career of Philosophy, vol. III, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashdall, H. (1907). The Theory of Good and Evil, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rashdell, H. (1905). A Theory of Good and Evil, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ratschow, Carl Heinz (1985). ‘Friedrich Nietzsche’ in Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the West, ed. Smart, Ninian et al., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1974). ‘Kelsen’s Theory of the Basic Norm’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence 19: 94–111. Repr. (with revisions) in Paulson, S. L. and Paulson, B. L. (eds.) (1998), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (1981). ‘The Purity of the Pure Theory’, Revue internationale de philosophie 138: 441–59. Repr. in Paulson, S. L. and Paulson, B. L. (eds.) (1998), 237–52.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. M. G. (1985). ‘Ernest Renan and the Religion of Science’ in Religion in the Age of Romanticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, Bernard M. G. (1975). Liberalism and Tradition: Aspects of Catholic Thought in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redman, D. A. (1997). The Rise of Political Economy as a Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reed, E. (1997). From Soul to Mind: The Emergence of Psychology from Erasmus Darwin to William James, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, T. J. (1974). Thomas Mann. The Uses of Tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rees, John (1998). The Algebra of Revolution, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Regge, T. (1961). ‘General relativity without coordinates’, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 19: 558–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1915). Der Begriff der Wahrscheinlichkeit für die mathematische Darstellung der Wirklichkeit (The Concept of Probability for the Mathematical Representation of Reality), Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1920). Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori, Berlin: Springer Verlag. Trans. 1965 Reichenbach, M., The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1924). Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Braunschweig: Vieweg. Trans. 1969 Reichenbach, M., Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1928). Philosophie der Raum-Zeit Lehre, Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter; trans. The Philosophy of Space and Time, New York: Dover, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1928). Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin: de Gruyter. Trans. 1958 Reichenbach, M. and Freund, J., The Philosophy of Space and Time, New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1935). Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre, Leiden: Sijthoff’s. Trans. 1949 Hutton, E. and Reichenbach, M., The Theory of Probability, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and Prediction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1939). ‘Dewey’s Theory of Science’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of John Dewey, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 157–92.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1944). Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1951). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956). The Direction of Time, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1958). The Philosophy of Space and Time, transl. Reichenbach, M. and Freund, J., New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Reid, C. (1970). Hilbert, New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinach, A. (1911). ‘Zur Theorie des negativen Urteils’ as repr. in Reinach, A., Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Ausgabe mit Kommentar, vol. I, 1989. Munich: Philosophia. Trans. 1982 Smith, B.On the Theory of the Negative Judgment’ in Smith, Barry (ed.), Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar
Reinach, A. (1913). ‘Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechts’, Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1: 685–847. Trans. Crosby, John, ‘The A Priori Foundations of the Civil Law’ in Aletheia 3 (1983): 1–142.Google Scholar
Reisch, G. A. (1994). ‘Planning Science: Otto Neurath and the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science’, British Journal for the History of Science 27: 153–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renan, Ernest (1847–61). Oeuvres complètes, 10 vols., ed. Psichari, Henriette. Paris: ColmannLévy.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernest (1863). Vie de Jésus, Paris: Michel Lévy frères. Trans. 1864 Wilbour, C. E., The Life of Jesus, New York: Carlton.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernest (1887–93). Histoire du peuple d' Israël, 5 vols., Paris: C. Lévy. Trans. 1888–96 Pitman, C. B. and Bingham, D. V., History of the People of Israel, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernest (1890). L' Avenir de la science, Paris: C. Lévy. Trans. 1891 Vandam, A. D. and Pitman, C. B., The Future of Science, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
RenanErnest, (1863–81). Histoire des origines du christianisme, 7 vols., Paris: Michel-Lévy frères. Trans. 1889–90 The History of the Origins of Christianity, London: Mathieson and Co.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1995). ‘The Rise and Fall of Analytic Philosophy’, in Rescher, N. 1993, Essays in the History of Philosophy, Aldershot: Avebury, 327–37.Google Scholar
Resnik, M. (1980). Frege and the Philosophy of Mathematics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rhees, R. (ed.) (1984). Recollections of Wittgenstein, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1870). La psychologie anglaise contemporaine: Ecole expérimentale, Paris: Ladrange. Trans. 1874, English Psychology, New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1879). La psychologie allemande contemporaine: Ecole expérimentale, Paris: Baillière. Trans. 1886 Baldwin, J. M., German Psychology of To-Day: The Empirical School, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1881). Maladies de la mémoire, Paris: Baillière. Trans. Fitzgerald, J. 1885, The Diseases of Memory: An Essay in Positive Psychology, 3rd edn, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1889). Psychologie de l'attention, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1890, The Psychology of Attention, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1907–8). ‘Symposium on the subconscious’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2, 33–7. Reprinted in Münsterberg, et al. 1911.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1914). La vie inconsciente et les mouvements, Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Ricci, G. and Levi-Civita, T. (1901). ‘Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications’, Mathematische Annalen 54: 125–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, J. (1905). ‘Les principes de mathématiques et le problème des ensembles’, Revue générale des sciences pures et appliquées 16: 541. Trans. 1967 Heijenoort, J., ‘The Principles of Mathematics and the Problem of Sets’ in Heijenoort, (ed.), 1967, 142–4.Google Scholar
Richards, R. (1987). Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, A. W. (1997a). ‘Toward a History of Scientific Philosophy’, Perspectives on Science 5: 418–51Google Scholar
Richardson, A. W. (1997b). ‘Two Dogmas about Logical Empiricism’, Philosophical Topics 25: 145–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A. W. (1998). Carnap’s Construction of the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, M. (1964). The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and His Age, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Rickert, H. (1896–1902). Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung: eine logische Einleitung in die historischen Wissenschaften (1929, 5th edn), Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. (abridged) 1986 Oakes, G., The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rickert, H. (1898). Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft (6th and 7th rev. edns, 1926), Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. 1962 Reisman, G., Science and History, A Critique of Positivist Epistemology, New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Rickert, H. (1902). Die Grenzen der Wissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung, 1st edn 1902. Abridged, and translated 1986 by Oakes, Guy from the 5th edn (1929), The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. G. (1994). ‘Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance, Empiricism and Conventionalism’ in Clark, P. and Hale, B. (eds.), Reading Putnam, Oxford: Blackwell, 176–200.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1948). Gabriel Marcel et Karl Jaspers, deux maîtres de l'existentialisme, Paris: Temps présent.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1965). De l'interprétation: essai sur Freud, Paris: Editions du Seuil. Trans. 1970 Savage, D., Freud and Philosophy: An Essay in Interpretation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riddel, J. N. (1992). ‘Bergson and the discourse of the moderns’ in Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (eds.) (1992), 330–67.Google Scholar
Riemann, B. (1867). ‘Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen’, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zur Göttingen 13: 133–52.Google Scholar
Rindler, W. (1960). Special Relativity, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1889). Darwinism and Politics, London: Swan Sonnenschein, 4th edn 1901.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1891). The Principles of State Interference: Four Essays on the Political Philosophy of Mr. Herbert Spencer, J. S. Mill, and T. H. Green, London: Swan Sonnenschein, 4th edn 1902.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1893). Darwin and Hegel with Other Philosophical Studies, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1894). Natural Rights: A Criticism of Some Political and Ethical Conceptions, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1902). Studies in Political and Social Ethics, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1905). Philosophical Studies, (ed.) Latta, R., London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, vol. VI: Miscellaneous Writings, ed. Nicholson, P. P., Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Rius, M. (1991). La filosofia d'Eugeni d'Ors (The Philosophy of Eugeni d'Ors), Barcelona: Curial Edicions Catalanes.Google Scholar
Roback, A. A. (1923). Behaviorism and Psychology, Cambridge, MA: University Book Store.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. (1992). The Logic of Reflection: German Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. H. (1990). Hope and its Hieroglyph: A Critical Decipherment of Ernst Bloch’s ‘Principle of Hope’, Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. H. (1992). A Theology on Its Way? Essays on Karl Barth, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. H. (1996). ‘Theology and Social Science’ in Ford, D. (ed.), The Modern Theologians, Oxford: Blackwell (2nd rev. edn, 1996), 700–19.Google Scholar
Roberts, Tyler T. (1998). Contesting Spirit: Nietzsche, Affirmation, Religion, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. (1981). An Intellectual History of Psychology, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1948). ‘The Emotive Theory of Ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. XXII: 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojszczak, A. (1994). ‘Wahrheit und Evidenz bei Franz Brentano’ (‘Brentano on Truth and Evidence’), Brentano Studien 5 187–218.Google Scholar
Rojszczak, A. (1998). ‘Truth-Bearers from Twardowski to Tarski’ in Kijania-Placek, K. and Woleński, J. (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojszczak, A. (1999). ‘Why Should a Physical Object Take on the Role of Truth-Bearer?’ in Köhler, E. and Woleński, J. (eds.), Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1883). Mental Evolution in Animals, with a Posthumous Essay on Instinct by Charles Darwin, London: Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1888). Mental Evolution in Man, Origin of Human Faculty, London: Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, S. (1984). Giovanni Gentile: La filosofia al potereMilan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Romero, Francisco (1951). ‘Latin American’s Twentieth-century Sages’. Américas, III.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1982). ‘Pragmatism and Philosophy’, Introduction to Consequences of Pragmatism, Brighton: Harvester, xiii–xlvii.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1993). ‘The Reification of Logic’ in Guignan, C. B. (ed.) 1993, The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (ed.) (1967). The Linguistic Turn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1978). The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. AdornoNew York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Michael (1996). Of Voluntary Servitude, Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Ross, A. (1961). ‘Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law’, Revista Jurídica de Buenos Aires, no. 4: 46–93 (bilingual printing). Repr. in Paulson, S. L. and Paulson, B. L. (eds.) (1998), 147–63.Google Scholar
Ross, J. (1893). Three Generations of English Women (memoirs and correspondence), revised edn, London: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and The Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1939). Foundations of Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rosser, J. B. (1936). ‘Extensions of Some Theorems of Gödel and Church’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 1: 87–91 Repr. in Davis, 1965, 230–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothacker, E. (1927). Logik und Systematik der Geisteswissenschaften (Logic and Systematic of the Human Sciences), Munich: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph (1988). Knowledge and Power, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, G. (1992). ‘The Perceptual Crises of Modernism and the Traditions of Enlightenment Vitalism: With a Note on Mikhail Bakhtin’ in Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (1992), 15–75.Google Scholar
Routley, R. (1980). Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond, Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1885). The Religious Aspect of Philosophy, Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1892) The Spirit of Modern Philosophy, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1899) The World and the Individual, First Series, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1901) The World and the Individual, Second Series, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1905) ‘The Relation of the Principles of Logic to the Foundations of Geometry’, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 24: 353–415. Reprinted in 1951 Royce, J. (Robinson, D. S., ed.), Royce’s Logical Essays, Dubuque: Wm C. Brown.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1908) The Philosophy of Loyalty, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1913) The Problem of Christianity, New York: Macmillan. Reprinted 1968, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1913). The Problem of Christianity, New York: Macmillan, 2 vols. New edn, 1967, New York: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1970) The Letters of Josiah Royce (ed. Clendenning, J.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah (1885). The Religious Aspect of Philosophy, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Repr. New York: Dover, 1983.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah (1897). The Conception of God, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah (1899–1900). The World and the Individual, 2 vols., New York: Macmillan. Repr. Magnolia, MA: Peter Smith, 1983.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah (1908). The Philosophy of Loyalty, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah (1912). The Sources of Religious Insight, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah (1913). The Problem of Christianity, New York: Macmillan. Reprinted, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Rozanov, V. V. (1886) O ponimanii (On Understanding), Moscow: E. Lissiev and Iu. Roman.Google Scholar
Rozanov, V. V. (1891 [1894]). Legenda o velikom inkvizitore F. M. Dostoevskogo, Moscow: Nikolaev; trans. (of 1906 St Petersburg edn) Roberts, S. 1972, Dostoevsky and the Legend of the Grand Inquisitor, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rozanov, V. V. (1990) V. V. Rozanov, Moscow: Nauka, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Rubinoff, L. (1970). Collingwood and the Reform of Metaphysics: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Runggaldier, E. (1984). Carnap’s Early Conventionalism: An Inquiry into the Background of the Vienna Circle, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John (1903–12). The Library Edition of the Works of John Ruskin, ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander, London.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John (1985). Unto this Last and Other Writings, ed. Wilmer, Clive, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John (1995). Selected Writings: Modern Painters, The Stones of Venice, The Seven Lamps of Architecture, Praeterita, ed. Davis, Philip, London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John (1996). Lectures on Art, ed. Beckley, Bill, New York: Allworth Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. and Whitehead, A. (1910–13). Principia Mathematica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1921). An Analysis of Mind, London: George Allen and Unwin, ch. 10.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1897). An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Repr. 1937, New York: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1900). A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, London: George Allen and Unwin. 2nd edn, 1937.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2nd edn (with a new introduction) 1937, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics, vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2nd edn (with a new introduction), Russell, B. A. W. 1937.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1905). ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14: 479–93 Repr. 1994 in Urquart, A. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. IV, London: Routledge, 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1905). ‘On Denoting’, Mind ns 14: 479–93. Repr. 1956 in Russell, B. A. W., ed. Marsh, R. C., Logic and Knowledge, London: George Allen and Unwin, 41–56.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1906). ‘On Some Difficulties in the Theory of Transfinite Numbers and Order Types’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 4 (second series): 29–53. Repr. 1973 in Russell, B. (ed. Lackey, D.), Essays in Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin, 135–64.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1908). ‘Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types’, American Journal of Mathematics 30: 222–62. Repr. (among other places) in Heijenoort, (ed.) 1967, 150–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1910a). Principia Mathematica, vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1910b). ‘On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood’ in Philosophical Essays, London: George Allen and Unwin. Reprinted in Russell, (1984–), vol. VI, 115–24.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1911). ‘Le Réalisme analytique’, Bulletin de la société française de philosophie, 11: 282–91 Trans. in Russell, (1984–), vol. VI, 133–46.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy, London: Williams and Norgate, repr. 1959 Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–32.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1913). Theory of Knowledge. Posthumously published 1984 in Russell, B. A. W. (ed. Eames, E. R.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. VII, Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1914). ‘The Relation of Sense-data to Physics’, Scientia 16, 1–27. Reprinted in Russell, (1984–), vol. VIII, 5–29.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1914). On Scientific Method in Philosophy, London: Oxford University Press. Repr. 1986 in The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. VIII, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1914). Our Knowledge of the External World, Chicago and London: Open Court.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1914). Our Knowledge of the External World, London: Open Court.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1914). Our Knowledge of the External World, New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1914a). ‘On the Nature of Acquaintance’, Monist 24: 1–16; 161–87; 435–53. Repr. 1956 in Russell, B. A. W., ed. Marsh, R. C., Logic and Knowledge, London: George Allen and Unwin, 127–74.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1914b). Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1915). ‘On the Experience of Time’, Monist 25: 212–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1916). Principles of Social Reconstruction, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1918–19). ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, The Monist 28: 495–527, 29: 32–63, 190–222, 345–80. Repr. 1986 in Slater, J. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. VIII, London: George Allen and Unwin, 160–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1918). ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, Monist 28: 495–527; 29 (1919): 33–63, 190–222. Reprinted in Russell, (1984–), vol. VIII, 160–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1918). ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, Monist 28: 495–527. Repr. 1956 in Russell, B., ed. Marsh, R. C., Logic and Knowledge, London: George Allen and Unwin, 177–281.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1918). ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, The Monist 28, 495–527, and (1919) 29, 32–63, 190–222, 345–80. Repr. in Russell, 1956, 175–282.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1921). The Analysis of Mind, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1924). ‘Logical Atomism’ in ed. Muirhead, J. H., Contemporary British Philosophy, vol. I, xxx. Reprinted in Russell, 1956, 321–43.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1927). ‘Introduction’, 2nd, edn Principia Mathematica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xiii–xlvi.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1927). An Outline of Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1927). The Analysis of Matter, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1927). The Analysis of Matter, New York: Harcourt Brace and London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1936). Religion and Science, New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1937). The Principles of Mathematics. 2nd edn, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1940). ‘The Philosophy of Santayana’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of George Santayana, La Salle, IL: Open Court; 2nd printing 1971, 451–74.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1940). An Enquiry into Meaning and Truth, New York: Norton and London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1948). Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1956). Logic and Knowledge, ed. Marsh, R. C., London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1959). My Philosophical Development, London: George Allen and Unwin. Repr. 1995, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1968). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell 1914–1944, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1984–). The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, B. A. W. (1984). Collected Papers, vol. VII, ed. Eames, E. R., London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B.Whitehead, A. (1910–13). Principia Mathematica., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1914). The Philosophy of Bergson, Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1921). Analysis of Mind, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1927). Philosophy, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1946). History of Western Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. (1994). Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. (1995). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism, New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. (1996). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ryckman, T. A. (1992). ‘(P)oint-(C)oincidence Thinking’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23: 471–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryckman, T. A. (2004). The Reign of Relativity: Philosophy in Physics, 1915–25, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1971). ‘Phenomenology versus The Concept of Mind’ in Collected Papers, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Sacquin, M. (ed.) (1988). Colloque Gabriel Marcel, Paris: Bibliothèque nationale, 1988.Google Scholar
Safranski, R. (1994). Ein Meister aus Deutschland: Heidegger und seine Zeit, Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag. Trans. 1998 Osers, E., Martin Heidegger: Between Good and EvilCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M. (1979). Russell, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R. M. (1979). Russell, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salazar Bondy, A. (1968) ¿Existe una filos ofía de nuestra américa? (Is There a Philosophy of our America?) Mexico City: Siglo Veitiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Salmon, Merrilee H. (1997). ‘Ethical Considerations in Anthropology and Archaeology, or Relativism and Justice for All’, Journal of Anthropological Research 53: 47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1979). Hans Reichenbach: Logical Empiricist, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. and Wolters, G. (1994). Logic, Language, and the Structure of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Salvadori, Massimo (1979). Karl Kautsky and the Socialist Revolution, 1880–1938, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Sánchez Barbudo, A. (1968). Estudios sobre Galdós, Unamuno y Machado (Studies on Galdós, Unamuno and Machado), Madrid, Guadarrama; new edn Barcelona: Lumen, 1981.Google Scholar
Sanchez Reulet, A. (1954). Contemporary Latin American Philosophy. Mexico City: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1905). Life of Reason: Or the Phases of Human Progress, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1920). ‘Three Proofs of Realism’ in Essays in Critical Realism: A Co-Operative Study of the Problem of Knowledge, London: Macmillan, 163–84.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1925). Dialogues in Limbo, London: Constable.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1940a). ‘A General Confession’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of George Santayana, La Salle, IL: Open Court; 2nd printing 1971, 1–30.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1942). Realms of Being, New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Santayana, George (1896). The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outline of Aesthetic Theory, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; reprint cited: New York: Dover Publications, 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santayana, George (1905). Reason in Art; The Life of Reason, vol. IV. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; cited from The Life of Reason, or the Phases of Human Progress; new one-volume edition revised by the author in collaboration with Cory, Daniel. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1954.Google Scholar
Santayana, George (1905). The Life of Reason, 5 vols. New York: Charles Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Santayana, George (1923). Skepticism and Animal Faith, New York: Charles Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Santayana, George (1925). ‘Dewey’s Naturalistic Metaphysics’, The Journal of Philosophy 22: 673–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santayana, George (1927–40). The Realms of Being, New York: Charles Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (1936a). L'Imagination, Paris: Alcan. Trans. 1962 Williams, F., Imagination, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (1936b). ‘La Transcendence de l'ego’, Recherches Philosophiques 6. Trans. 1962 Williams, F. and Kirkpatrick, R., The Transcendence of the Ego, New York: Noonday.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (1939). Esquisse d'une théorie des émotions, Paris: Hermann. Trans. 1962 Mairet, P., Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (1940). L'Imaginaire, Paris: Gallimard. Trans. 1948 Frechtman, B., The Psychology of the Imagination, New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (1943). L'ê tre et le néant: essai d'ontologie phénoménologique, Paris: Gallimard. Trans. 1956 Barnes, H., Being and Nothingness, New York: Philosophical Library and 1957 London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1938). La Nausée. New edition 1981 in Œuvres romanesques, ed. Contat, Michel and Rybalka, Michel, Paris: Gallimard (Pléiade). Trans. 1965 Baldick, Robert, Nausea, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sauer, W. (1989). ‘On the Kantian Background of Neopositivism’, Topoi 8: 111–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand (1916). Cours de lingusitique generale, ed. Bally, C. and Sechehaye, A., Lausanne and Paris: Payot. Trans. 1977 Baskin, Wade, Course in General Linguistics, Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Schabas, M. (1990).A World Ruled by Number: William Stanley Jevons and the Rise of Mathematical Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacht, R. (1983). Nietzsche, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Israel (1974). Four Pragmatists, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (1913, 1916). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik, 2 vols. Halle: M. Niemayer. Trans. 1973 Frings, M. S. and Funk, R., Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (1923). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie, 2nd edn, Bonn: Cohen. Trans. 1954 Heath, P., The Nature of Sympathy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. von (1800). System des transzendentalen Idealismus, Tübingen. Trans. 1993 Heath, P., intro. Vater, M., System of Transcendental idealism (1800), Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. (1891). Riddles of the Sphinx: A Study of the Philosophy of Evolution, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. (1903). Humanism, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. (1929). Logic for Use, London: G. Bell.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. (1934). Must Philosophers Disagree?, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schiller, J. C. F. (1975). Briefe über die Ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen. Jena: no publisher. Repr. in Goedeke, K. (ed.), Schillers sämmtliche Schriften, Stuttgart, 1867–76. Trans. 1967 Wilkinson, F. M. and Willoughby, L. A., On the Aesthetic Education of Men, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schillp, P. A. and Hahn, L. E. (eds.) (1984). The Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel, La Salle, IL: Library of Living Philosophers, vol. XXII.Google Scholar
Schilpp, P. A. (1963). The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1949). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers.Google Scholar
Schlegel, J. H. (1995). American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schlick, M. (1910). ‘Das Wesen der Wahrheit nach der modernen Logik’, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie und Soziologie 34: 386–477 Trans. 1979 Heath, P., ‘The Nature of Truth in Modern Logic’ in Schlick, M. (ed. Mulder, H. L. and Velde-Schlick, B. F. B.), Philosophical Papers, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, 41–103.Google Scholar
Schlick, M. (1917). Raum und Zeit in der gegenwärtigen Physik, Berlin: Springer Verlag. Trans. 1979 Heath, P., ‘Space and Time in Contemporary Physics’ in Schlick, M. (ed. Mulder, H. L. and Velde-Schlick, B. F. B.), Philosophical Papers, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, 207–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M. (1918, 1925). Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, Berlin: Springer. Trans. of 2nd edn 1974 Blumberg, A. and Feigl, H., General Theory of Knowledge, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Schlick, M. (1925). General Theory of Knowledge, English trans. 1974 by Blumberg, A. E., Vienna and New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Schlick, M. (1930). ‘Die Wende der Philosophie’, Erkenntnis 1: 4–11 Trans. 1979 Heath, P., ‘The Turning-Point in Philosophy’ in Schlick, M. (ed. Mulder, H. L. and Velde-Schlick, B. F. B.), Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Dordrecht: Reidel, 154–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M. (1932). ‘Positivismus und Realismus’, Erkenntnis 3: 1–31 Trans. 1979 Heath, P., ‘Positivism and Realism’ in Schlick, M. (ed. Mulder, H. L. and Velde-Schlick, B. F. B.), Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Dordrecht: Reidel, 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M. (1934). ‘Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis’, Erkenntnis 4: 79–99 Trans. 1979 Heath, P., ‘On the Foundation of Knowledge’ in Schlick, M. (ed. Mulder, H. L. and Velde-Schlick, B. F. B.), Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Dordrecht: Reidel, 370–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M. (1979). Philosophical Papers, 2 vols., ed. Mulder, H. L. and Velde-Schlick, B. F. B.. Trans. Heath, P., Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1925a). Politische Romantik, Berlin: Duncker and Humboldt. Trans. 1986 Oakes, G., Political RomanticismCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1925b). Römischer Katholizismus und politsche Form, Munich: Theatiner-Verlag. Trans. 1996 Ulmen, G., Roman Catholicism and Political FormWestport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1934). Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität, Munich: Duncker and Humblot. Trans. 1985 Schwab, G., Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of SovereigntyCambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1963a). ‘Das Zeitalter der Neutralisierungen und Entpolitisierungen’ in Der Begriff des Politischen, Berlin: Duncker and Humboldt. Trans. 1993 Konzett, M. and McCormick, J., ‘The Age of Neutralisations and Depoliticisations’, Telos96.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1963b). Der Begriff des Politischen: Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei CorollarienBerlin: Duncker and Humboldt. Trans. 1976 Schwab, G., The Concept of the PoliticalNew Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, H. (1983). Philosophie in Deutschland 1831–1933, Frankfurt on Main: Suhrkamp Trans 1984 Matthews, E., Philosophy in Germany 1983–1933, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1977). Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scholder, K. (1977–85). Die kirchen im dritten Reich, 2 vols., Berlin. Trans. 1987–8 The Churches and the Third Reich, London: SCM.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1836). Ueber den Willen in der Natur, Eine Erörterung der Bestätigungen welche die Philosophie des Verfassers seit ihrem Auftreten, durch die empirischen Wissenschaften erhalten hat, Frankfurt on Main: Siegmund Schmerber. Trans. 1992 Payne, E. F. J., ed. Cartwright, D., On the Will in Nature: A Discussion of the Corroborations From the Empirical Sciences that the Author’s Philosophy Has Received Since its First Appearance, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1844). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, 2nd edn Berlin: H. Bohm. Trans. 1969 Payne, E. F. J., The World as Will and Representation, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1844). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, 2nd edn, 2 vols., Leipzig: Brockhaus. Trans. 1966 Payne, E. F. J., The World as Will and Representation, New York: Dover Books.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1844). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, 2nd edn, 2 vols. Leipzig, Brockhans; trans. 1958 Payne, E. F. J., The World as Will and Representation, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Schröder, E. (1877). Operationskreis des Logikkalküls, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Schröder, E. (1890–1905). Vorlesungen zur Algebra der Logik, 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner. Repr. 1966, New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1954). Space-Time Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schulte, J. (1993). Experience and Expression: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Bart (ed.) (1992). Essays on Henry Sidgwick, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt, Vienna: Springer-Verlag. Trans. 1967 Walsh, G. and Lehnert, F., The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, A. (1964). Collected Papers, vol. II, The Hague: Njihoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scripture, E. W. (1897). The New Psychology, London: Charles Scribner’s Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, W. S. and Salinger, G. L. (1975). Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory and Statistical Thermodynamics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Sears, W. S. (1953). Thermodynamics, the Kinetic Theory of Gases and Statistical Mechanics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Selby-Bigge, L. A. (1897). British Moralists, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sell, A. P. F. (1988). The Philosophy of Religion 1875–1980, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, R. W. (1916). Critical Realism: A Study of the Nature and Conditions of Knowledge, New York: Rand, McNally.Google Scholar
Sellars, R. W. (1922). Evolutionary Naturalism, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood (1916). Critical Realism: A Study of the Nature and Conditions of Knowledge, Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood (1922). Evolutionary Naturalism, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood (1932). The Philosophy of Physical Realism, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood (1943). ‘Dewey on Materialism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 111: 381–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood (1944). ‘Does Naturalism Need Ontology?The Journal of Philosophy 41: 686–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood (1944). ‘Is Naturalism Enough?The Journal of Philosophy 41: 533–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, W. S. (1963). Science, Perception and Reality, London and New York: Routledge. Repr. 1991, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1956). ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’, in Feigl, H. and Scriven, M. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 253–329. Repr. 1963 in Sellars, W.Science, Perception and Reality, London: Routledge, 127–96.Google Scholar
Seth, A. (1887) Hegelianism and Personality, Edinburgh: Blackwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Sextus Empiricus (1976), Outlines of Pyrrhonism, English trans. Bury, R. G., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shanker, S. G. (ed.) (1988). Gödel’s Theorem in Focus, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (1985). ‘Second-order Languages and Mathematical Practice’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50: 714–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharif, M. M. (1966). In Search of Truth, Lahore: Institute of Islamic Culture.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1874) The Methods of Ethics, London: Macmillan. New edition 1966, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1883). Principles of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1902). Lectures on the Ethics of T. H. Green, Mr. Herbert Spencer, and J. Martineau, (ed.) Jones, E. E. C., London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1874 [1907]). The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sieg, W. (1988). ‘Hilbert’s program sixty years later’, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 2: 338–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieg, W. (1997). ‘Step by Recursive Step: Church’s Analysis of Effective Calculability’, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3: 154–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sierpiński, W. (1965). Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers, Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Sigwart, C. (1873–8). Logik, 2 vols., Tübingen.Google Scholar
Sigwart, C. (1873 [1889]). Logik, zweite durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage, Freiburg i.B.: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. 1895 Dendy, H., Logic, 2nd edn, revised and enlarged, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. and Stern, J. P. (1981). Nietzsche on Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillem, E. J. (ed.) (1969). The Philosophical Notebook of John Henry Newman, 2 vols., Louvain: Nauwelaerts Publishing House.Google Scholar
Simhony, Avital and Weinstein, David (eds.) (2001). The New Liberalism: Reconciling Liberty and Community, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. (1892). Die Probleme der Geschichtsphilosophie, 1st edn (1989 Gesamtausgabe, vol. II), Frankfurt on Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1904). Kant, Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1905). Die Probleme der Geschichtsphilosophie, 2nd rev. edn (1997 Gesamtausgabe, vol. IX), Frankfurt on Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1977 Oakes, G., The Problems of the Philosophy of History: An Epistemological Essay, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1918). ‘Vom Wesen des historischen VerstehensBerlin: Mittler. Trans. 1980 Oakes, G., ‘On the Nature of Historical Understanding’, in Essays on Interpretation in Social Science, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 97–126.Google Scholar
Simon, Linda (1998). Genuine Reality: A Life of William James, Chicago: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Simons, P. (1995). ‘Meaning and Language’ in Smith, and Smith, 1995, 106–37. An account of Husserl’s theory.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. (1917). A Defence of Idealism, New York: Macmillan, p. v.Google Scholar
Singer, E. A. (1911). ‘Mind as an Observable Object’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8: 180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinisi, V. and Woleński, J. (eds.) (1994). The Heritage of Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. (1983). John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed 1883–1920, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. (1994). John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Saviour 1921–46, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1938). Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1945). ‘Operational Analysis of Psychological Terms’, Psychological Review 52: 270–7, 291–4. Repr. 1972 in Skinner, B. F., Cumulative Record: A Selection of Papers, 3rd edn, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 370–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1976). Particulars of My Life, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Skolem, T. (1920). ‘Logisch-kombinatorische Untersuchungen über die Erfüllbarkeit und Beweisbarkeit mathematischen Sätze nebst einem Theorem über dichte Mengen’, Skriferutgi av Videnkapsselkapet I Kristiana, I. Matematisk-naturvidenskabelig klasse, no. 4: 1–36 Partial trans. 1967 Bauer-Mengelberg, S., ‘Logico-combinatorial Investigations in the Satisfiability or Provability of Mathematical Propositions: A Simplified Proof of a Theorem by L. Lowenheim and Generalizations of the Theorem’ in Heijenoort, J. (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 254–63.Google Scholar
Skolem, T. (1923). ‘Begrundung der elementaren Arithmetik durch rekurrierende Denkweise ohne Anwendung Scheinbarer Veranderlichen mit unendlichem Ausdehnungsbereich’, Videnskapsselskapets skrifter, 1, Matematisk-naturvidenskabelig Klasse, n. 6. Trans. 1967 Heijenoort, J., ‘The Foundations of Elementary Arithmetic established by means of the Recursive Mode of Thought, without Use of Apparent Variables ranging over Infinite Domains’, From Frege to Godel. A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 303–33.Google Scholar
Skolem, T. (1923). ‘Einige Bemerkungen zur Axiomatischen Begründen der Mengenlehre’, Matematischerkongressen in Helsingfors 4–7 Juli 1922, Den femte skandinaviska Matematikerkongressen, Redogörelse, Helsinki: Akademiska Bokhandeln, 217–32. Trans. 1967 Bauer-Mengelberg, S., ‘Some Remarks on Axiomatized Set Theory’ in Heijenoort, J. (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 291–301.Google Scholar
Skolem, T. (1930). ‘Einige Bemerkungen zu der Abhandlung von E. Zermelo: “Über die Definitheit in der Axiomatik”’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 15: 337–41 Repr. 1970 in Skolem, T. (ed. Fenstad, J. E.), Selected Works in Logic, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 275–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolem, T. (1933). ‘Über die Unmöglichkeit einer vollständigen Charakterisierung der Zahlenreihe mittels eines endlichen Axiomensystems’, Norsk matematisk forenings skrifter 2 (10): 73–82. Reprinted in Skolem, 1970, 345–54.Google Scholar
Skolem, T. (1934). ‘Über die Nicht-charakterisierbarkeit der Zahlenreihe mittels endlich oder abzählbar unendlich vieler Aussagen mit ausschliesslich Zahlenvariablen’ (‘On the Noncharacterisability of the Number Sequence by Means of Finitely or Countably Infinitely Many Propositions Containing Only Variables for Numbers’), Fundamenta Mathematicae 23: 150–61 Reprinted 1970 in Skolem, T., Selected Works in Logic, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolem, T. (1970). Selected Works in Logic, ed. Fenstad, J., Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Skolimowski, H. (1967). Polish Analytical Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skorupski, J. (1993). English-Language Philosophy 1750–1945, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sleinis, E. E. (1994). Nietzsche’s Revaluation of Values, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smart, N. et al. (1985ff.). Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the West, 3 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, Ninian, et al. (eds.) (1985). Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the West, vol. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chs. 7 and 8.Google Scholar
Smith, B. and Smith, D. W. (1995). Introduction in , B. Smith and Smith, D. W. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. (1978). ‘An Essay in Formal Ontology’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 6: 39–62.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1986). ‘Austrian Economics and Austrian Philosophy’ in Grassl, W. and Smith, B. (eds.), Austrian Economics: Historical and Philosophical Background, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1987). ‘On the Cognition of States of Affairs’ in Mulligan, K. (ed.), Speech Act and Sachverhalt: Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology, Dordrecht: Nijhoff: 189–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. (1989a). ‘On The Origins of Analytical Philosophy’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 35: 153–73.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1989b). ‘Logic and Formal Ontology’ in Mohanty, J. N. and McKenna, W. (eds.), Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Textbook, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1989, 29–67.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1990). ‘Towards a History of Speech Act Theory’ in Burckhardt, A. (ed.), Speech Acts, Meanings, and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle, Berlin: de Gruyter, 29–61.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1992). ‘Sachverhalt’ in Ritter, J. and Gründer, K. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Basle: Schwabe & Co, vol. VIII, 1102–13.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1994). ‘Husserl’s Theory of Meaning and Reference’ in Haaparanta, L. (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Mathematics, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. (1994). Austrian Philosophy, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1999). ‘Truthmaker Realism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77, 274–91.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (ed.) (1988). Foundations of Gestalt Psychology, Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar
Smith, B.(ed.) (1982). Parts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar
Smith, B.W. (1976). J. Maritain: anti-modern or ultramodern? An Historical Analysis of his Critics, his Thought and his Life, New York and Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1914–16).The Hibbert Lectures. The second series of these unpublished essays is in the archives of Magdalen College, Oxford (Magdalen MSS. 1026 I–3). There are notes by Collingwood, R. G. in the Bodleian Library, Modern Manuscripts.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1926). Letter of 18 February to Alexander, Samuel, Alexander Archive, John Rylands Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1929–30). Gifford Lectures. Syllabi and fragments remain in the Magdalen College, Oxford archives (Magdalen MSS. 1026 II–27).Google Scholar
Smith, John E. (1950). Royce’s Social Infinite, New York: Library of Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Smith, John E. (1985). ‘William James and Josiah Royce’ in Smart, Ninian et al. (eds.), Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the West, vol. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997). Fontana History of the Human Sciences, London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Smolin, L. (1992). ‘Space and Time in the Quantum Universe’ in Ashtekar, A. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser, 228–88.Google Scholar
Smuts, J. C. (1926). Holism and Evolution, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sokal, M. (1984). ‘The Gestalt Psychologists in behaviourist America’, American Historical Review, 89, 1240–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, Ricaurte (1968). El positivismo argentino (Argentine Positivism). Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Solly, T. (1839). A Syllabus of Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soloviev, V. S. (1874) Krizis zapadnoi filosofii: protiv pozitivistov, Trans. 1996 Jakim, B., The Crisis of Western Philosophy: Against the Positivists, West Stockbridge, MA: Lindisfarne Press.Google Scholar
Soloviev, V. S. (1877–81). Chteniia o bogochelovechestve, Trans. 1948 Zouboff, P., Lectures on Godmanhood, London: Dennis Dobson.Google Scholar
Soloviev, V. S. (1892–4). Smysl liubvi, Trans. 1985 Beyer, T. R., The Meaning of Love, West Stockbridge, MA: Lindisfarne Press.Google Scholar
Soloviev, V. S. (1950) A Solovyov Anthology. Ed. Frank, S.; trans. Duddington, N., London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Soloviev, V. S. (1966–70). Sobranie sochinenii (Collected Works), 12 vols., Brussels.Google Scholar
Soloviev, V. S. (1988) Sochinenia (Works), 2 vols., Moscow: Mys'l.Google Scholar
Somerville, James M. (1968). Total Commitment: Blondel’s L'Action, Washington: Corpus Books.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, A. (1949). ‘To Albert Einstein’s Seventieth Birthday’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 99–105.Google Scholar
Sorel, Georges (1908). Réflexions sur la violence, Paris: Editions de pages libres. Trans. Hulme, T. E. repr. 1950, Reflections on Violence, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Soulez, P. (1997). Bergson, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Souriau, J.-M. (1964). Géométrie et Relativité, Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Spence, K. W. (1944). ‘The Nature of Theory Construction in Contemporary Psychology’, Psychological Review 51: 47–68 Repr. 1960 in Spence, K. W., Behavior Theory and Learning: Selected Papers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 17–38.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1855). The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. London: Williams and Norgate. 2nd edn 1870, 3rd edn 1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, H. (1862–96). System of Synthetic Philosophy vols. I–VI, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1862). First Principles, vol I of Spencer (1862–96). Repr. 1996, London: Routledge and Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1884). Man versus the State, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1862). First Principles.London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1864–7). Principles of Biology, 2 vols. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1870–72). Principles of Psychology, 2 vols., 2nd edn, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1876–96). Principles of Sociology, 3 vols. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1893) Principles of Ethics, 2 vols. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1904). An Autobiography, 2 vols. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1907). The Data of Ethics, London: Williams and Norgate. (Original edn 1879.)Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert. (1960). The Phenomenological Movement: An Historical Introduction, Phenomenologica 5/6, vols. I and II, The Hague: Njihoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spirito, U. (1974). L'idealismo italiano e suoi critici, 2nd. edn Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Spivak, M. (1979). A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, Berkeley, CA: Publish or Perish.Google Scholar
Spranger, E. (1921). Lebensformen (Forms of Life), Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sprigge, T. L. S. (1993) James and Bradley: American Truth and British Reality, Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Sprigge, T. L. S. (1995). Santayana, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Srzednicki, J. T. J. and Stachniak, Z. (eds.) (1998). Leśniewski’s System: Protothetic, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srzednicki, J. T. J., Rickey, V. F., and Czelakowski, J. (eds.) (1984). Leśniewski’s Systems: Ontology and Mereology, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff and WrocŁaw: Ossolineum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stace, W. T. (1939). ‘Novelty, Indeterminism, and Emergence’, Philosophical Review 48: 295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachel, J. (1986). ‘What a Physicist Can Learn from the Discovery of General Relativity’ in Ruffini, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishers, 1857–62.Google Scholar
Stachel, J. (1989). ‘Einstein’s Search for General Covariance, 1912–1915’ in Howard, D. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser, 63–100. (Based on a paper circulating privately since 1980.)Google Scholar
Stachel, J. (1995). ‘History of Relativity’ in Brown, L. M., Pais, A., and Pippard, B.Sir (eds.), Twentieth Century Physics, vol. I, Bristol: Institute of Physics Publ., 249–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachel, J. (ed.) (1989). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. II, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stadler, F. (1991). ‘Aspects of the Social Background and Position of the Vienna Circle at the University of Vienna’ in Uebel, (1991), 51–77.Google Scholar
Stadler, F. (1993). Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, F. (1997). Studien zum Wiener Kreis. Ursprung, Entwicklung und Wirkung des Logischen Empirismus im Kontext, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 2001 Nielsen, C., The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development and Influence of Logical Empiricism, Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Stamatescu, I.-O. (1994). ‘Quantum Field Theory and the Structure of Space-Time’ in Stamatescu, I.-O. (ed.), Philosophy, Mathematics and Modern Physics, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansky, Peter (1983). Morris, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stebbing, L. S. (1933). ‘Concerning Solipsism: Reply to Braithwaite’, Analysis 1: 26–8Google Scholar
Stebbing, L. S. (1937). Philosophy and the Physicists, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Stedman-Jones, Gareth (1972). ‘The Marxism of the Early Lukács’, New Left Review, 70, 27–64.Google Scholar
Steenson, Gary P. (1991). Karl Kautsky, 1854–1938, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Stephan, A. (1992). ‘Emergence – A Systematic View of its Historical Facets’ in Beckermann, A. et al. (eds.) (1992), 25–48.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie (1882). The Science of Ethics, London: Smith, Elder, and Co.Google Scholar
Stern, D. G. (1995). Wittgenstein on Mind and Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. (1937). ‘The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms’, Mind 46: 14–31. 10–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. (1938). ‘Persuasive Definitions’, Mind 47: 331–50. Repr. in Stevenson, 1963, 32–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. (1944). Ethics and Language, Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. (1948). ‘The Nature of Ethical Disagreement’, Sigma8–9. Repr. in Stevenson, 1963, 1–9. This piece was written in 1941.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. (1963). Facts and Values, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. (1792). Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind, Part 1. Reprinted 1859 with Part 2, ed. Wright, G. N., London: Tegg.Google Scholar
Stillwell, J. (1996). Sources of Hyperbolic Geometry, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirk, P. (1992). Max Horkheimer: A New InterpretationLanham, MD: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Stirling, J. H. (1865) The Secret of Hegel, London: Longmans, Green. Second edn 1898, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Stock, G. (1985) ‘Negation: Bradley and Wittgenstein’, Philosophy 60: 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, G. (ed.) (1998) Appearance Versus Reality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M. (1992). Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland (History of Public Law in Germany), 3 vols., Munich: C. H. Beck (1988–99), vol. II: Staatsrechtslehre und Verwaltungsrecht 1800–1914 (Public Law Theory and Administrative Law 1800–1914).Google Scholar
Stolnitz, Jerome. (1961a). ‘On the Origins of “Aesthetic Disinterestedness”’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StolnitzJerome, . (1961b). ‘On the Significance of Lord Shaftesbury in Modern Aesthetic Theory’, Philosophical Quarterly 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, G. F. (1896). Analytic Psychology, London: Swan Sonnenschein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, G. F. (1899). A Manual of Psychology, London and New York: University Correspondence College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, G. M. (1903). ‘A Psychological Test of Virtue’, International Journal of Ethics 11: 200–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeter, B. H. (1927). Reality, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Streeter, B. H.(ed.) (1912). Foundations, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stumpf, C. (1873). Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung (The Psychological Origin of Our Presentation of Space), Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Stumpf, C. (1907). ‘Zur Einteilung der Wissenschaften’ (‘The Classification of the Sciences’) in Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil-hist. Kl., p. 4.Google Scholar
Stumpf, C. (ed.) (1939/40). Erkenntnistheorie (The Theory of Knowledge), Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Suckiel, Ellen Kappy (1996). Heaven’s Champion: William James’s Philosophy of Religion, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. M. (1996). ‘The “Truth” in Solipsism, and Wittgenstein’s Rejection of the A Priori’, European Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 2: 195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sully, J. (1884). Outlines of Psychology: With Special Reference to the Theory of Education, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Sully, J. (1892). The Human Mind: A Text-Book of Psychology, London: Longmans, Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories. 2nd edn, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. (1997) Idealism and Rights: The Social Ontology of Human Rights in the Political Thought of Bernard Bosanquet, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. (1998). ‘Bernard Bosanquet’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Synge, J. L. (1955). Relativity: The Special Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Synge, J. L. (1964). The Petrov Classification of Gravitational Fields, Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Taine, H. (1864). Le Positivisme Anglais, Paris: Baillière. Trans. 1870 Haye, T. D., English Positivism, London: Simpkin, Marshall and Co.Google Scholar
Taine, H. (1865). Philosophie de l'ArtParis: Baillière. Trans. 1865, Taine, , The Philosophy of Art, London: Baillière.Google Scholar
Taine, H. (1870). De l'intelligence, 2 vols., Paris: Hachette. Trans. 1871 Haye, T. D., On Intelligence, London: Reeve and Co. and New York: Holt and Williams.Google Scholar
Taine, Hippolyte (1897). De l'intelligence. Paris: Hachette, vol. II. Trans. 1899 Haye, T. D., On Intelligence, New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Tanabe, Hajime (1946). Zangedō to shite no tetsugaku, Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. Trans. 1988 Yoshinori, Takeuchi, with Viglielmo, Valdo H. and Heisig, James W., Philosophy as Metanoetics, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Tanner, M. (1994). Nietzsche, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarascio, V. J. (1968). Pareto’s Methodological Approach to Economics, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. (1933). Pojecie prawdy w jezykach nauk dedukcyjnych, Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, wydial III, no. 34. Trans. 1956 Woodger, J. H. (ed.), ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ in Tarski, A., Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2nd edn, 1983 ed. Corcoran, J., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. (1936). ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica 1, 261–405. There is an English version with replies to criticisms, ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4, 341–75. Repr. in Linsky, 1952, 13–49.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. (1956). Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics Papers from 1923–1939, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2nd edn 1984, Corcoran, J., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. (1986). Collected Papers, vols. I–IV, ed. Givant, R. S. and McKenzie, R. M., Basle: Birkhaüser Verlag.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1932). The Faith of a Moralist, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. W. (1992). Men versus the State: Herbert Spencer and Late Victorian Individualism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (ed.) (1996). Herbert Spencer and the Limits of the State: The Late Nineteenth-century Debate between Individualism and Collectivism, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ronald (ed.) (1977). Aesthetics and Politics: The Key Texts of the Classic Debate within German Marxism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Temple, W. (1934). Nature, Man and God (Gifford Lectures 1932–4), London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tennant, R. F. (1928, 1930). Philosophical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. (1968). Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Thayer, Henry S. (1968). Meaning and Action: A Critical History of American Pragmatism, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (1987) The Moral Philosophy of T. H. Green, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Geoffrey (1987). The Moral Philosophy of T. H. Green, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Process in Animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement no. 8, New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiles, J. E. (1988). Dewey, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tillich, P. (1988–). Main Works, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tilliette, X. (1989). Filosofi davanti a cristo: Maurice Blondel e il pancritismo, Brescia: Quiriniana.Google Scholar
Tilliette, X. (1990). Le Christ de la philosophie, Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Tilliette, X. (1993). Le Christ des philosophes, Namur: Culture et Vérité.Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1898). ‘The Postulates of a Structural Psychology’, Philosophical Review 7: 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention, New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1909a). Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of the Thought-Processes, New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1909b). A Text-Book of Psychology, New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1914). ‘On “Psychology As the Behaviorist Views It” ’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 53: 1–17.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1926). ‘A Behavioristic Theory of Ideas’, Psychological Review 33: 352–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1927). ‘A Behaviorist’s Definition of Consciousness’, Psychological Review 34: 433–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men, New York: Century.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1938). ‘Determiners of Behavior at a Choice Point’, Psychological Review 45: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1949). ‘Discussion: Interrelationships between Perception and Personality’, Journal of Personality 18: 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1951a). Collected Papers in Psychology, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1951b). ‘A Psychological Model’ in Parsons, T. and Shils, E. A. (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 279–361.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo (1898). What is Art? Transl. 1995 Pevear, Richard and Volokhonsky, Larissa. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Torretti, R. (1978). Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torretti, R. (1996), Relativity and Geometry, New York: Dover (1st edn Pergamon, 1983).Google Scholar
Trautman, A., Pirani, F. A. E., and Bondi, H. (1965). Lectures on General Relativity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Trautman, A. (1973). ‘Theory of Gravitation’ in Mehra, J. (ed.), The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, Dordrecht: Reidel, 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trendelenburg, F. A. (1840). Logische Untersuchungen (Logical Investigations), Berlin: Gustav Bethge.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, F. A. (1867). ‘Über eine Lücke in Kants Beweis der ausschliessenden Subjectivität des Raumes und der Zeit Ein kritisehes und anti-kritisches Blatt’ (‘On a Gap in Kant’s Proof of the Exclusive Subjectivity of Space and Time. A Critical and Anti-critical Page’), Historische Beitrag zur Philosophie 3: 214–76.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, F. A. (1869). Kuno Fischer und sein Kant (Kuno Fischer and his Kant), Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Tresmontant, Claude (1963). La métaphysique de Maurice Blondel (The Metaphysics of Maurice Blondel), Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Troeltsch, E. (1922). Der Historismus und seine Probleme, erstes Buch: das logische Problem der Geschichtsphilosophie (Gesammelte Schriften, vol. III) (Historicism and its Problems, Book I: The Logical Problem of the Philosophy of History), Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Trubetskoi, E. N. (1913 [1995]). Mirosozertsanie Vl. S. Solov'ëva (Soloviev’s Worldview), Moscow: Medium.Google Scholar
Turing, A.M. (1937). ‘On Computable numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2, 42: 230–65; correction, 43: 544–6 Reprinted in Davis, 1965, 116–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Frank M. (1974). Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, R. S. (1980). ‘Helmholtz’, Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. V, New York: Scribners, pp. 241–53.Google Scholar
Turner, R. S. (1994). In the Eye’s Mind: Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering Controversy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twardowski, K. (1891). Idee und Perzeption; eine erkenntnis-theoretische Untersuchung aus Descartes (Idea and Perception; An Epistemological inquiry into Descartes), Diss. Vienna: W. Konogen.Google Scholar
Twardowski, K. (1894). Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen, Wien: Alfred Hölder. Trans. 1977 Twardowski, K. (ed. Grossmann, R.), On the Content and Object of Presentations, The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Twardowski, K. (1900). ‘O tak zwanych prawdach wzglȩdnych’ (‘On So-Called Relative Truths’) in Ksiȩga Pamiakowa Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego ku uczczeniu piȩćsetnej rocznicy fundacji Jagiellońskiej Uniwersytetu krakowskiego, Lvov: Nakładem Senatu Akademickiego Uniwersytetu lwowskiego. Trans. 1998 in Brandl, J. and Woleński, J. (eds.), Kasimir Twardowski. Selected Writings, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Twardowski, K. (1912). ‘O czynnościach i wytworach’ in Ksiȩga pamiatkowa Uniwersytetu lwowskiego ku uczczeniu 250-tej rocznicy zalłożenia Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego przez króla Jana Kazimierza, Lvov: Uniwersytet Lwowski, 1–33. Partly trans. 1979 Wojtasiewicz, O., ‘Actions and Products’ in Pelc, J. (ed.), Semiotics in Poland 1894–1969, Dordrecht: Reidel and Warsaw: PWN, 13–27. Trans. 1998 in Brandl, J. and Woleński, J. (eds.), Kasimir Twardowski. Selected Writings, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Twardowski, K. (1919–20). ‘O jasnym i niejasnym stylu filozoficznym’ in Ruch Filozoficzny, Partly, V. trans. 1979 Wojtasiewicz, O., ‘On Clear and Obscure Styles of Philosophical Writings’ in Pelc, J. (ed.), Semiotics in Poland 1894–1969, Dordrecht: Reidel and Warsaw: PWN, 1–2. Trans. 1998 in Brandl, J. and Woleński, J. (eds.), Kasimir Twardowski. Selected Writings, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Twardowski, K. (1977). On the Content and Object of Presentation. A Psychological Investigation, The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twardowski, K. (1999). Selected Philosophical Papers, ed. Brandl, J. and Woleński, J., Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Tyler, C. (1998). Thomas Hill Green and the Philosophical Foundations of Politics: An Internal Critique, Lewiston and Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive Culture, London: Murray.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1889). ‘On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to the Laws of Marriage and Descent’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18: 245–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (1991). Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (1992). Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within: The Emergence of Neurath’s Naturalism in the Vienna Circle’s Protocol Sentence Debate, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (1996a). ‘Anti-Foundationalism and the Vienna Circle’s Revolution in Philosophy’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 415–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (1996b). ‘The Enlightenment Ambition of Epistemic Utopianism: Otto Neurath’s Theory of Science in Historical Perspective’ in Giere, and Richardson, (1996), 91–112.Google Scholar
Uebel, T. (1992). Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within: The Emergence of Neurath’s Naturalism in the Vienna Circle’s Protocol Sentence Debate, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Unamuno, M. (1895). En torno al casticismo (On Authentic Tradition), Madrid: La España Moderna.Google Scholar
Unamuno, M. (1905). Vida de Don Quijote y Sancho (The Life of Don Quijote and Sancho), Madrid: Renacimiento. Our Lord Don Quixote and Sancho with Related Essays, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Unamuno, M. (1913). Del sentimiento trágico de la vida en los hombres y en los pueblos, Madrid: Renacimiento. The Tragic Sense of Life in Men and in Peoples, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Unamuno, M. (1925). La agonía del cristianismo, Paris: Editorial Excelsior. The Agony of Christianity and Essais of Faith, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Unamuno, M. (1933). San Manuel Bueno, mártir, Madrid, Espasa Calpe. ‘Saint Emmanuel the Good, Martyr’ in Abel Sánchez and Other Histories, Chicago: Regnery, 1956.Google Scholar
Unamuno, M. (1959–64). Obras completas (Complete Works), Madrid: Vergara, 16 vols.; repr. Madrid: Escelicer, 1966, 9 vols.Google Scholar
Unno, Taitetsu (ed.) (1990). The Religious Philosophy of Tanabe Hajime: The Metanoetic Imperative, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Upham, T. C. (1841). Elements of Mental Philosophy, Embracing the Two Departments of the Intellect and the Sensibilitiess, 2nd edn, 2 vols., New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1956). Philosophical Analysis: Its Development Between the Two World Wars, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1968). The Emotive Theory of Ethics, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1975). ‘A Defence of Intuitionism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75: 111–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaihinger, H. (1882–92). Kommentar zur Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason), 2 vols. Stuttgart, . Repr. 1970 Aalen: Scientia Verlag.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, H. (1902a). Die Deduktion der Kategorien (The Deduction of the Categories), Halle a.S.: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, H. (1902b). Nietzsche als Philosophe (Nietzsche as Philosopher), Halle a.S.: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, H. (1911). Die Philosophie des Als Ob. System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus. Mit einem Anhang über Kant und Nietzsche, 3rd edn, Leipzig: F. Meiner, 1918. Trans. 1924 Ogden, C., Philosophy of ‘As If’: A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, H. (1911). Die Philosophie des als-ob, Berlin: Reuther and Reichard. Trans. 1924 Ogden, C. K., The Philosophy of As-If, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Vailati, G. (1911). Scritti, (Writings), ed. Calderoni, M., Ricci, U., and Vacca, G.. Florence: Successori B. Seeber.Google Scholar
van Brakel, J. (1985). ‘The Possible Influence of the Discovery of Radio-active Decay on the Concept of Physical Probability’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 31, 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Leeuw, G. (1933). Phänomenologie der Religion, Tübingen. Trans. 1938 Turner, J. E., Religion in essence and manifestation: a study in phenomenology, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Heijenoort, J. (ed.) (1967). From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rootselaar, B. (1981). ‘Zermelo, Ernst Riedrich Ferdinand’, Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. XIV, 613–16. New York: Charles Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Vargish, Thomas (1970). The Contemplation of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vaz Ferreira, C. (1920). Lógica Viva (Live Logic), Montevideo: Talleres graficos A. Barreiro y Ramos.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1899 [1967]). The Theory of the Leisure Class, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Veitch, J. (1882). Hamilton, Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Vekhi. Sbornik statei o russkoi intelligentsii (1909) Moscow: Kushnerev, I. N.. Trans. Shatz, M. S. and Zimmerman, J. E., Signposts. A Collection of Essays on the Russian Intelligentsia, Irvine, CA: Charles Schlacks Jr, 1986.Google Scholar
Veneruso, D. (1984). Gentile e il primato della tradizione culturale italiana: Il dibattito politico all'interno del fascismoRome: Edizioni Studium.Google Scholar
Venn, J. (1881). Symbolic Logic, London: Macmillan. Repr. 1979, New York: Chelsea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venturi, F. (1960) Roots of Russian Populism: A History of the Populist and Socialist Movements in Nineteenth-Century Russia. Trans. Haskell, F.. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. and Plant, R. (1984). Philosophy, Politics and Citizenship: The Life and Thought of the British Idealists, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. (ed.) (1986) The Philosophy of T. H. Green, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Vinogradoff, P. (1920). Outlines of Historical Jurisprudence, 2 vols., London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Virgoulay, R. and Troisfontaines, C. (1975–6). Maurice Blondel: bibliographie analytique et critique. I. Oeuvres de M. B. (1880–1973), II. Etudes sur M. B. (1893–1913), Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Virgoulay, R. (1980). Blondel et le modernisme, la philosophie de l'action et les sciences religieuses, Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Volkelt, J. (1879). Immanuel Kant’s Erkenntnistheorie (Immanuel Kant’s Theory of Cognition), Leipzig: Verlag von Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, H.U. (1947). Prometheus; Studien zur Geschichte des deutschen Idealismus, Heidelberg: F. H. Kerle Verlag.Google Scholar
von Kries, J. (1886). Die Principien der Wahrscheinlichkeits-Rechnung (The Principles of Probability), Freiburg: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Von Mises, L. (1927). Liberalismus, Jena: G. Fischer. Trans. 1985 Raico, R., Liberalism in the Classic Tradition, San Francisco: Cobden Press.Google Scholar
Von Mises, L. (1932). Die Gemeinwirtschaft, 2nd edn (1st edn 1922), Jena: G. Fischer. Trans. 1936 Kahane, J., Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, London: Jonathan Cape.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Mises, R. (1928). Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit, Vienna: Springer-Verlag. Trans. 1957 Bernstein, J. and Newton, R. G., Probability, Statistics, and Truth, New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (1994). Creating Modern Probability: Its Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy in Historical Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wagner, H. (1983). Alfred Schütz: An Intellectual Biography, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Waissman, F. (1965). The Principles of Linguistic Philosophy, ed. Harré, R., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Waissman, F. (1967). Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis, ed. McGuiness, B. F., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Waitz, T. (1878). Grundlegung der Psychologie, 2nd edn, Leipzig: Siegismund and Volkening.Google Scholar
Wajsberg, M. (1977). Logical Works, ed. Surma, S. J., Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Walicki, A. (1973) Rosyjska filozogia I mysl spaleczna od oswiexenia do marksizmu, Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna. Trans. 1980 Andrews–Rusiecka, H., A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Walicki, A. (1987) Legal Philosophies of Russian Liberalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Walicki, Andrzy (1979). A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Walicki, Andrzy (1995). Marx and the Leap to the Kingdom of Freedom, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. (1988). War and the Image of Germany, Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. (1874) The Logic of Hegel translated from The Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with Prolegomena, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Second edition (2 titles): 1892, The Logic of Hegel translated from The Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences, Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1894, Prolegomena to the Study of Hegel’s Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. (1890). Life of Schopenhauer, London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Wallwork, Ernest (1972). Durkheim: Morality and Milieu, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walras, L. (1874 [1900]). Eléments d'économie politique pure, 4th edn, Lausanne: F. Rouge and Paris: F. Pichon. Repr. edn 1976 Paris: R. Pichon and R. Durand-Auzias.Google Scholar
Walsh, W. H. (1986) ‘Green’s Criticism of Hume’ in Vincent, A. (ed.), The Philosophy of T. H. Green, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Ward, J. (1886). ‘Psychology’, in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th edn, Philadelphia: Stoddart, vol. XX, 42–90.Google Scholar
Ward, J. (1893). ‘“Modern” Psychology: a Reflexion’, Mind n.s. 2, 54–82.Google Scholar
Wardman, H. W. (1964). Ernest Renan: A Critical Biography, London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Warnock, M. (1960). Ethics Since 1900, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, H. C. (1914). Human Psychology, New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Washburn, M. F. (1908). The Animal Mind: A Text-book of Comparative Psychology, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1913a). ‘Image and Affection in Behavior’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10: 421–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1913b). ‘Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It’, Psychological Review 20: 158–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1914). Behavior: An Introduction to Comparative Psychology, New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist, Philadelphia: Lippincott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism, New York: People’s Institute Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (1897). Christianity and Idealism, with an introductory essay by Howison, George Holmes, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (1919). The State in Peace and War, Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Watsuji, Tetsurō (3 vols: 1937, 1942, 1949). Rinrigaku (Ethics), Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. Partial trans. 1996 Seisaku, Yamamoto and Carter, Robert E., Rinrigaku: Ethics in Japan, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Watsuji, Tetsurō (1935). Fudo, Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. Trans. 1961 Bownas, Geoffrey, Climate and Culture: A Philosophical Study, Tokyo: Hokuseido Press. Repr. 1988, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Watsuji, Tetsurō (1952). Nihon rinri shisōshi (A History of Japanese Ethical Thought), Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Webb, C. C. J. (1918–20). God and Personality, 2 vols. (Gifford lectures 1918–19), Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Webb, C. C. J. (1925). ‘Outline of a philosophy of religion’ in Muirhead, J. H. (ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Webb, C. C. J. (1933). A Study of Religious Thought in England from 1850, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weber, E. H. (1834). De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu: annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae, Leipzig: Köhler. Trans. 1996 Ross, H. E. and Murray, D. J., E. H. Weber on the Tactile Senses, 2nd edn, Hove: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1918a). Parlament und Regierung im neugeordneten Deutschland. Zür politischen Kritik des Beamtentums und Parteiwesens, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Trans. 1994 as ‘Parliament and government in Germany under a New Political Order: Towards a Critique of Officialdom and the Party System’ in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R., Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 130–271.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1904). ‘Die “Objectivität” im sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 19: 22–87 Trans. 1949 Shils, E. A. and Finch, H. A., ‘“Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy’, in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 49–112.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1906). ‘Kritische Studien auf dem Gebiet der kulturwissenschaftlichen Logik’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 22: 143–207 Trans. 1949 Shils, E. A. and Finch, H. A., ‘Critical Studies in the Logic of the Cultural Sciences: a Critique of Eduard Meyer’s Methodological Views’, in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 113–88.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1913). ‘Über einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie’, Logos 4: 253–94 Trans. 1981 Graber, E., ‘Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology’, Sociological Quarterly 22: 145–80Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1918b). Der Sozialismus, Vienna: ‘Phöbus’ Kommissions-verlag Dr. Viktor Pimmer o.J. Trans. 1994 as ‘Socialism’ in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R., Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 272–303.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1919). ‘Politik als Beruf’, Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischen Bund, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. Trans. 1994 as ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’ in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R., Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309–69.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1921). Gesammelte politische Schriften. Munich: Drei Masken Verlag. Ed. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W., 1946 From Max Weber, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1922a). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. and ed. 1949 Shils, E. and Finch, H. A., The Methodology of the Social Sciences, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1922b). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Trans. 1978 Roth, G. and Wittich, C., Economy and Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie, Berlin: Springer Verlag. 4th edn (1921).Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1973). Gravitation and Cosmology. Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1989). ‘The Cosmological Constant Problem’, Reviews of Modern Physics: 61, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weindling, P. J. (1989). ‘Ernst Haeckel’s Darwinismus and the secularization of nature’ in Moore, James R. (ed.), History, Humanity and Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 311–29.Google Scholar
Weintraub, R. (1985). General Equilibrium Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, C. (1972). Protestant Thought in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude (1985). Protestant Thought in the Nineteenth Century, vol. II: 1870–1914, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Welchman, J. (1995). Dewey’s Ethical Thought, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wempe, B. (1986). Beyond Equality: A Study of T. H. Green’s Theory of Positive Freedom, Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1912). ‘Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung’ (‘Experimental Studies on the Seeing of Movement’), Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 161–265. Abbreviated translation published in Shipley, T. (ed.), Classics in Psychology, New York: Philosophical Library, 1032–89.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1923). ‘Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II’ (‘Laws of Organisation in Perceptual Forms’) Psychologische Forschung 4, 301–50. Translation published in Ellis, , 1938, 71–88. Available at: http:/psychclassics.yorku.ca/Wertheimer/Forms/forms.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive Thinking, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert (1991). John Dewey and American Democracy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weyl, H. (1910). ‘Über die Definition der mathematischen Grundbegriffe [On the Definition of the Fundamental Mathematical Concepts]’, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Blätter 7: 93–5, 109–13. Repr. 1968 Weyl, H. (ed. Chandrasekharan, K.) Gesammelte Abhandlungen [Collected Papers], vols. I–VI, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag, vol. I, 298–304.Google Scholar
Weyl, H. (1917). Das Kontinuum: kritische Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Analysis, Leipzig: Veit. Trans. 1987 Pollard, S. and Bole, T., The Continuum: A Critical Examination of the Foundations of Analysis, Kirksville, MT: The Thomas Jefferson University Press, 1987. Repr. 1994, New York: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Weyl, H. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie, Berlin: Springer Verlag. 4th edn 1921, trans. 1922 Brose, H., Space-Time-Matter, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Whately, R. (1826). Elements of Logic, London.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J. A. (1962). Geometrodynamics, New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1847). The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 2nd edn, London: Parker, J. W.. Repr. 1967, ed. Herival, J., New York and London: Johnson Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. (1996). Aristotle’s ‘De Interpretatione’: Contradiction and Dialectic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. and Russell, B. A. W. (1910–13). Principia Mathematica, vols. I–III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2nd edn 1925.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1896). Universal Algebra, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1898). A Treatise on Universal Algebra, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1911). Introduction to Mathematics, new edn 1958, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1919). Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Natural Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The Concept of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1922). The Principle of Relativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1926). Religion in the Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1926). Science and the Modern World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New edn 1967, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1928). Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New edn 1959, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality, New York: Macmillan and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929a). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Corrected edn 1978, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929b). The Function of Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. New edn 1958, Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1933). Adventures of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New edn 1967, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New edn 1968, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1947). Essays in Science and Philosophy, New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B. A. W. (1910–13). Principia Mathematica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2nd edn 1927, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.N. (1917). The Aims of Education and Other Essays, London: Williams and Norgate. 2nd edn 1950, London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. (1956). Language, Thought and Reality, ed. Carroll, John B., New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Whyte, L. L. (1979). The Unconscious Before Freud, London: Friedman.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. (1935). The Common Sense of Political Economy, 2 vols. Robbins, L. (ed.), London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Wiggershaus, Rolf (1986). Die Frankfurter Schule, Munich: Hanser Verlag, 1986. Trans. 1994 Robertson, M., The Frankfurt School: Its Histories, Theories and Political Significance, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiggershaus, Rolf (1994). The Frankfurt School, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Willard, D. (1984). Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge, Athens, OH: University of Ohio Press.Google Scholar
Willey, T. (1987). Back to Kant, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, K. A. (1931). ‘Five Behaviorisms’, Americal Journal of Psychology 43: 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Cook (1926). Statement and Inference, ed. Farquharson, A. S. L., 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, David (1978). The Social and Political Thought of Herbert Spencer, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Windelband, W. (1884). Präludien (Preludes), 2 vols. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Windelband, W. (1892). Geschichte der Philosophie, Freiburg. Trans. 1893 Tuffs, J., A History of Philosophy With Especial Reference to the Formation and Development of its Problems and Conceptions, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Windelband, W. (1894). ‘Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft (Strassburger Rektoratsrede 1894)’, in Windelband, 1907, 355–79.Google Scholar
Windelband, W. (1907). Präludien: Aufsätze und Reden zur Einleitung in die Philosophie, 3rd rev. edn (1st edn 1884), Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. O. (1933). ‘Solipsism’, Analysis 1: 17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisdom, J. (1934). Problems of Mind and Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1921). ‘Logische-philosophische Abhandlung’, Annalen der Naturphilosophie. Trans. 1922 Ogden, C. K., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge; revised trans. 1961 tr. Pears, D. F. and McGuiness, B. F., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Ogden, C. K., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1929). ‘Some Remarks on Logical Form’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume 9, 162–71. Reprinted in Philosophical Occasions (ed. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.), Indianapolis: Hackett, 29–35.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The Blue and Brown Books (dictated 1933–4), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notebooks 1914–1916. Ed. Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1965). ‘Lecture on Ethics’, Philosophical Review 74: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). ‘Notes for Lectures on “Private Experience” and “Sense Data”’, Philosophical Review77.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). ‘Wittgenstein’s Notes for Lectures on “Private Experience” and “Sense Data” ’ (notes made 1936), ed. Rhees, R., The Philosophical Review 77, 275–320. Reprinted in Wittgenstein, 1993a: 202–88.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H., trans. Paul, D. and Anscombe, G. E. M., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). The Blue and Brown Books, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore, ed. Wright, G. H., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Philosophische Grammatik (notes made 1932–4), ed. Rhees, R., trans. Kenny, A. J. P., Philosophical Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Philosophische Bemerkungen (notes made 1929–30), ed. Rhees, R., trans. Hargreaves, R. and White, R., Philosophical Remarks, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Bemerkungen zu den Grundlagen der Mathematik (notes made 1937–44), ed. Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Notebooks 1914–1916, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Wittgenstein’s Lectures. Cambridge 1932–1935. Ed. Ambrose, A., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1981). Zettel, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1984). ‘The Language of Sense Data and Private Experience’, Philosophical Investigations 7, 2–45 and 101–40. Repr. in Wittgenstein, (1993a), 290–367.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1993a). Philosophical Occasions (reprinted versions of Wittgenstein’s shorter published works), ed. Klagge, James and Nordmann, Alfred, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1993b). ‘Notes for the Philosophical Lecture’, ed. Stern, D., in Wittgenstein, 1993a, 447–58.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1966). Lectures & Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Barrett, Cyril, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woleński, J. and Simons, P. (1989). ‘De Veritate: Austro-Polish Contributions to the Theory of Truth from Brentano to Tarski’ in Szaniawski, K. (ed.), The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woleński, J. (1989). Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woleński, J. (1998). ‘Theories of Truth in Austrian Philosophy’ in Czarnecki, T. (ed.), Rationalistic Epistemology (Reports on Philosophy, No. 18), Cracow: Jagellonian University Press.Google Scholar
Woleński, J. (ed.) (1990). Kotarbiński: Logic, Semantics and Ontology, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, W. (1975). From Radicalism to Socialism: Men and Ideas in the Formation of Fabian Socialist Doctrines, 1881–1889, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, R. (1990). The Politics of Being: The Political Thought of Martin Heidegger, New York: Columbia University, Press.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1959) F. H. Bradley, Baltimore: Penguin Books. 2nd edn 1969.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1991). Freud, 2nd edn, London: FontanaCollins.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R., and Hopkins, J. (eds.) (1982). Philosophical Essays on Freud, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, R. (ed.) (1974). Freud: A Collection of Critical Essays, New York: Anchor Doubleday. Reprinted 1977 as Philosophers on Freud: New Evaluations, New York: Aronson.Google Scholar
Wolsky, M. I. and Wolsky, A. A. (1992): ‘Bergson’s Vitalism in the Light of Modern Biology’ in Burwick, F. and Douglass, P. (1992), 153–70.Google Scholar
Woodard, C. (1991). ‘A Wake (or Awakening?) for Historical Jurisprudence’ in The Victorian Achievement of Sir Henry Maine. A Centennial Reappraisal, ed. Diamond, Alan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 242–55.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, B. A. (1977). Alfred North Whitehead: A Primary-Secondary Bibliography, Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, F. J. E. (1909). ‘Consciousness, the Sense Organs, and the Nervous System’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6: 449–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbridge, F. J. E. (1913). ‘Belief in Sensations’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbridge, F. J. E. (1921). ‘Mind Discerned’, The Journal of Philosophy 18: 337–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbridge, F. J. E. (1925). ‘Behavior’, The Journal of Philosophy 22: 402–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbridge, F. J. E. (1926). The Realm of Mind: An Essay on Metaphysics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, F. J. E. (1937). Nature and Mind: Selected Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, R. L. (ed.) (1971). Positivism in Latin America. Lexington, MA, Heath.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1948). Contemporary Schools of Psychology, rev. edn, New York: Ronald Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worms, F. (1992). Introduction à Bergson: l'âme et le corps, Paris: Hatier.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (1989). ‘Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy of Mind: Sensation, Privacy, and Intention’, The Journal of Philosophy 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (1997). ‘On the Philosophical Significance of Frege’s Theorem’ in Heck, (ed.) 1997, 201–44.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (ed.)(1983). Frege: Tradition and Influence, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wright, Terence R. (1986). The Religion of Humanity: The Impact of Comtean Positivism on Victorian Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1862). Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrnehmung, Leipzig: Winter.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1863). Vorlesungen ueber Menschen- und Thierseele, 2 vols., Leipzig: Voss.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie, Leipzig: Engelmann. 2nd edn 1880; 3rd edn 1887.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1883). ‘Schlusswort zum ersten Band’, Philosophische Studien 1: 615–17.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1886). Eléments de psychologie physiologique, 2 vols., Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1894). ‘Ueber psychische Causalität und das Prinzip des psychophysischen Parallelismus’, Philosophische Studien 10: 1–124.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1901). Grundriss der Psychologie, 4th edn, Leipzig: Engelmann. Trans. 1902 Judd, C. H., Outlines of Psychology, 2nd edn, Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. M. (1908). Logik: III.Band, Logik der Geisteswissenschaften, 3rd edn, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1862). Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrnehmung, Leipzig: C. F. Winter’sche Verlagshandlung.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie, Leipzig: Engelmann. Partial trans. 1904 Titchener, E. B., Principles of Physiological Psychology, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1883). Logik: eine Untersuchung der Prinzipien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden wissenschaftlicher Forschung, zweiter Band: Methodenlehre (Logic: An Investigation of the Principles of Cognition and the Methods of Scientific Research, vol. II: Doctrine of Method), Stuttgart: F. Enke.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1893–5). Logik: eine Untersuchung der Prinzipien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden wissenschaftlicher Forschung (Logic: An Investigation of the Principles of Cognition and the Methods of Scientific Research), vol. I, Stuttgart: F. Enke.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1895). Logik: eine Untersuchung der Prinzipien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden wissenschaftlicher Forschung, zweiter Band: Methodenlehre, zweite Abtheilung: Logik der Geisteswissenschaften (Logic: An Investigation of the Principles of Cognition and the Methods of Scientific Research, vol. II: Doctrine of Method, second part: Logic of the Human Sciences), Stuttgart: F. Enke.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1913). Die Psychologie im Kampf ums Dasein (Psychology in the Struggle for Existence), Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. M. (1907). The Dancing Mouse: A Study in Animal Behavior, New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yerkes, R. M. (1917). ‘Behaviorism and Genetic Psychology’, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 14: 154–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. (1992). Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. (2002). Heidegger’s Later Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zahar, E. (1989). Einstein’s Revolution. A Study in Heuristic, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Zahar, E. (1996). ‘Poincaré’s Structural Realism and his Logic of Discovery’ in Greffe, J. L., Heinzmann, G., and Lorenz, K., Henri Poincaré: Science and Philosophy, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Zahar, E. (1997). Leçons d'Epistémologie (Lessons in Epistemology), Paris: Cahiers du CREA.Google Scholar
Zavala, Jacinto, Agustin, (ed.) with ohara, Tamiyo Kambe (2 vols.: 1995, 1997). Textos de la Filosofia Japonesa Moderna: Antologia, Zamora, Michacán: El Colegio de Michoacán.Google Scholar
Zawirski, Z. (1994). Selected Writings on Time, Logic and the Methodology of Science, ed. Szumilewicz-Lachman, I., Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Zea, L. (1942). ‘En torno a la filosofía americana’ (‘On (Latin) American Philosophy’), in Ensayos sobre filosofía de la historia; (Essays on the Philosophy of History), Mexico.Google Scholar
Zea, L. (1968). El positivismo en México (Positivism in Mexico). Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Trans. 1974 Schutte, O., Positivism in Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zea, L. (ed.) (1980). ‘El pensamiento positivista latinoamericano’ (Latin American Positivist Thought), Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho.Google Scholar
Zeeman, E. C. (1967). ‘The Topology of Minkowski space’, Topology 6: 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, E. (1862). ‘Über Bedeutung und Aufgabe der Erkenntnistheorie’ (‘On the Significance and Task of the Theory of Knowledge’), Heidelberg (Antrittsrede). Reprinted in Vorträge und Abhandlungen, Leipzig: Fues, 1865–84.Google Scholar
Zermelo, E. (1904). ‘Beweis, dass jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann (Aus einem an Herrn Hilbert gerichteten Briefe)’, Mathematische Annalen 59: 514–16 Trans. Mengelberg, S. Bauer, ‘Proof that Every Set Can Be Well-ordered’, in Heijenoort, van 1967, 139–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zermelo, E. (1908). ‘Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre, I’, Mathematische Annalen 65, 261–81. Trans. 1967 Bauer-Mengelberg, S., ‘Investigations in the Foundations of Set Theory I’ in Heijenoort, J. (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 200–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zermelo, E. (1908a). ‘Neuer Beweis für die Möglichkeit einer Wohlordnung’, Mathematische Annalen 65: 107–28. Trans. 1967 Bauer-Mengelberg, S., ‘A New Proof of the Possibility of a Well-Ordering’, in Heijenoort, (ed.) 1967, 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zermelo, E. (1930). ‘Über Grenzzahlen und Mengenbereiche: Neue Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre’, Fundamenta mathematicae, 16, 29–47. Trans. 1996 Hallett, M., ‘On Boundary Numbers and Domains of Sets: New Investigations in the Foundations of Set Theory’, in Ewald, (ed.) 1996, vol. II, 1208–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zermelo, E. (1966). ‘On the Mechanical Explanation of Irreversible Processes’ in Brush, S. G. (ed.), Kinetic Theory 2, Oxford and London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ziehen, T. (1891). Leitfaden der physiologischen Psychologie, Jena: G. Fischer. Trans. 1892 Liew, C. C. and Beyer, O.W., Introduction to Physiological Psychology, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (1990). Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, and ArtBloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Zolo, D. (1989). Reflexive Epistemology: The Philosophical Legacy of Otto Neurath, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubiri, X. (1944). Naturaleza, Historia, Dios, Madrid: Editora Nacional. Nature, History, God, Washington DC: University of America Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.069
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.069
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.069
Available formats
×