Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:58:31.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Further Details on the Role of Education and Technology in the Productivity Performance among the Advanced Industrial Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Edward N. Wolff
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

The Role of Education

There are three paradigms that appear to dominate current discussions of the role of education in economic growth. The first has stemmed from human capital theory. The second could be classified as a catch-up model. And the third important approach has stressed the interactions between education and technological innovation and change.

The Human Capital Approach

Human capital theory views schooling as an investment in skills and hence as a way of augmenting worker productivity (see, for example, Schultz 1960, 1961, and 1971; and Becker, 1975). This line of reasoning leads to growth accounting models in which productivity or output growth is derived as a function of the change in educational attainment.

The early studies on this subject showed very powerful effects of educational change on economic growth. Griliches (1970) estimated that the increased educational attainment of the U.S. labor force accounted for one-third of the Solow residual, the portion of the growth of output that could not be attributed to the growth in (unadjusted) labor hours or capital stock, between 1940 and 1967. Denison (1979b) estimated that about one-fifth of the growth in U.S. national income per person employed between 1948 and 1973 could be attributed to increases in educational levels of the labor force. Jorgenson and Fraumeni (1993) calculated that improvements in labor quality accounted for one-fourth of U.S. economic growth between 1948 and 1986. Maddison (1987), in a growth accounting study of six OECD countries covering the years 1913 to 1984, generally found that increases in educational attainment explained a significant proportion of productivity growth, though the contributions varied by country and subperiod.

Type
Chapter
Information
Productivity Convergence
Theory and Evidence
, pp. 217 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×