Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T03:49:43.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Localization and tracking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Mohammad S. Obaidat
Affiliation:
Monmouth University, New Jersey
Sudip Misra
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

The term “localization” in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) refers to determining the location of a device in the absence of additional infrastructure, such as satellites. As such the location discovery service enables a device to know its location. The use of additional devices is not suitable for wireless networks, especially the resource-constrained ones, because of the power-hungry nature of such devices. For example, the global positioning system (GPS) uses the distance measurements from satellites to calculate the location of a device. Additionally, GPS cannot be used in indoor localization. Traditionally, the localization problem has its origin in the field of robotics, where it is necessary to locate a robot. For navigation of a robot through a terrain, it is important to have the location information.

The information provided by wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is highly correlated with respect to space and time. In applications such as target tracking [1], geographic routing [2, 3], environmental monitoring [4], structural health monitoring [5], and forest fire monitoring [6], the location of information generating sensors is very important. As an example, in forest fire monitoring applications, the location of fire is required to be tracked in order to take preventive measures. Further applications include the optimization of medium access and improvement of location-based geographic routing protocols. However, being a network of small low-powered devices, the localization problem for WSNs is very different from other networks. Also, the localization of the nodes is important for tagging the sensor information with nodes’ location information.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, W.-P., Hou, J. C. and Sha, L., “Dynamic clustering for acoustic target tracking in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 258–271, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H. and Shen, H., “Energy-efficient beaconless geographic routing in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 881–896, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, L. T., Wang, Y. and Hauswirth, M., “Geographic routing in wireless multimedia sensor networks,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking, pp. 68–73, 2008.
Handcock, R. N., Swain, D. L., Bishop-Hurley, G. J., et al., “Monitoring animal behaviour and environmental interactions using wireless sensor networks, GPS collars and satellite remote sensing,” Sensors, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 3586–3603, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S., Pakzad, S., Culler, D., et al., “Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), pp. 254–263, 2007.
Son, B., Her, Y.-S. and Kim, J., “A design and implementation of forest-fires surveillance system based on wireless sensor networks for South Korea mountains,” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS), Vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 124–130, 2006.Google Scholar
Bhatti, S. and Xu, J., “Survey of target tracking protocols using wireless sensor network,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC), Cannes, La Bocca, pp. 110–115, 2009.Google Scholar
Mao, G., Fidan, B. and Anderson, B. D. O., “Wireless sensor network localization techniques,” Computer Networks, Vol. 51, No. 10, pp. 2529–2553, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pal, A., “Localization algorithms in wireless sensor networks: current approaches and future challenges,” Network Protocols and Algorithms, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, J. and Taylor, C., “Localization in sensor networks,” Handbook of Sensor Networks: Algorithms and Architectures, ISBN: , 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F. and Guibas, L. J., Wireless Sensor Networks: An Information Processing Approach, Morgan Kaufmann, ISBN: , 2004.Google Scholar
Bergamo, P. and Mazzini, G., “Localization in sensor networks with fading and mobility,” in Proceedings of International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Networks, pp. 750–754, 2002.
Niculescu, D. and Nath, B., “Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AoA,” in Proceedings of INFOCOM, pp. 1734–1743, 2003.
Shang, Y., Ruml, W., Zhang, Y. and Fromherz, M. P. J., “Localization from mere connectivity,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile ad hoc Networking & Computing, Annapolis, Maryland, USA, pp. 201–212, 2003.Google Scholar
Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J. and Estrin, D., “Adaptive beacon placement,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Phoenix, Arizona, April 2001.Google Scholar
Langendoen, K. and Reijers, N., “Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: a quantitative comparison,” Computer Networks, Vol. 43, pp. 499–518, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulusu, N., Bychkovskiy, V., Estrin, D. and Heidemann, J., “Scalable, ad hoc deployable RF-based localization,” in Proceedings of Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2002.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S. and Meertens, L., “Diffusion based localization,” private communication, 2004.
Chraibi, Y., “Localization in wireless sensor networks,” Master’s Degree Project, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.
He, T., Huang, C., Blum, B. M., Stankovic, J. A. and Abdelzaher, T., “Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 81–95, 2003.Google Scholar
Savvides, A., Han, C. C. and Srivastava, M. B., “Dynamic fine grained localization in ad hoc networks of sensors,” in Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Rome, Italy, pp. 166–179, 2001.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. and Liu, Y., “Quality of trilateration: confidence-based iterative localization,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 631–640, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojha, T. and Misra, S., “HASL: high-speed AUV-based silent localization for underwater sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness, LNICST 115, pp. 128–140, Greater Noida, India, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojha, T. and Misra, S., “MobiL: a 3-dimensional localization scheme for mobile underwater sensor networks,” in Proceedings of National Conference on Communications (NCC), pp. 1–5, New Delhi, India, 2013.Google Scholar
Novikov, A. and Bagtzoglou, A., “Hydrodynamic model of the lower Hudson River estuarine system and its application for water quality management,” Water Resources Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 257–276, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagtzoglou, A. and Novikov, A., “Chaotic behavior and pollution dispersion characteristics in engineered tidal embayments: a numerical investigation,” Journal of American Water Resources Association, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 207–219, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priyantha, N. B., Balakrishnan, H., Demaine, E., and Teller, S., “Anchor-free distributed localization in sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Los Angeles, California, USA, p. 340, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D., Leonard, J., Rus, D. and Teller, S., “Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 50–61, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, K.-Y., Lui, K.-S. and Tam, V., “Localization in sensor networks with limited number of anchors and clustered placement,” in Proceedings of Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Kowloon, pp. 4425–4429, 2007.Google Scholar
Borg, I. and Groenen, P., Modern Multidimensional Scaling, Theory and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2005.Google Scholar
Lim, H. and Hou, J. C., “Localization for anisotropic sensor networks,” in Proceedings of INFOCOM, Vol. 1, pp. 138–149, 2005.
Maroti, M., Kusy, B., Balogh, G., et al., “Radio interferometric geolocation,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), pp. 1–12, 2005.
Huang, R., Zaruba, G. V. and Huber, M., “Complexity and error propagation of localization using interferometric ranging,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 3063–3069, 2007.Google Scholar
Alsindi, N. A., Pahlavan, K. and Alavi, B., “An error propagation aware algorithm for precise cooperative indoor localization,” in Proceedings of IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM), pp. 1–7, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
Kay, S. M., Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1993.Google Scholar
Misra, S. and Khatua, M., “Cross-layer techniques and applications in wireless sensor networks,” in Rashvand, H. and Kavian, Y. (Eds.), Using Cross-Layer Techniques for Communication Systems, pp. 94–119, 2012, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veeravalli, V. V. and Chamberland, J. F., “Detection in sensor networks,” in Wireless Sensor Networks: Signal Processing and Communications Perspectives, Swami, A., Zhao, Q., Hong, Y. W. and Tong, L. (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, 2007, pp. 119–148.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. and Cao, G., “DCTC: dynamic convoy tree-based collaboration for target tracking in sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 1689–1701, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W.-R., Lin, H.-T. and Cheng, Z.-Z., “CODA: a continuous object detection and tracking algorithm for wireless ad hoc sensor networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 168–174, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, W., “A new convex hull algorithm for planar sets,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 398–403, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, R. L., “An efficient algorithm for determining the convex hull of a finite planar set,” Information Processing Letters, Vol. 1, pp. 132–133, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, J., “Convex hulls in 2D,” Chapter 3 in Computational Geometry in C, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S. and Singh, S., “Localized policy-based target tracking using wireless sensor networks,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 27:1–27:30, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, T., Boleng, J. and Davies, V., “A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research,” Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 483–502, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Winter, J. and Lee, W.-C., “Prediction-based strategies for energy saving in object tracking sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM), pp. 346–357, 2004.
Chen, Y.-S. and Liao, Y.-J., “HVE-mobicast: a hierarchical-variant-egg-based mobicast routing protocol for wireless sensornets,” in Proceedings of Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Las Vegas, NV, pp. 697–702, 2006.Google Scholar
Weisstein, E. W., “Cassini ovals”, From MathWorld – A Wolfram Web Resource [Online] .
Yang, H. and Sikdar, B., “A protocol for tracking mobile targets using sensor networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, pp. 71–81, 2003.
Yeow, W.-L., Tham, C.-K. and Wong, W.-C., “Energy efficient multiple target tracking in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 918–928, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeow, W.-L., Tham, C.-K., and Wong, W.-C., “A novel target movement model and energy efficient target tracking in sensor networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE VTC – Spring, pp. 2825–2829, 2005.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×