Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:59:23.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Pronominal gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Peter Siemund
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access

Summary

The expression of gender in English is confined to pronouns of the third person (he, she, it). Therefore, we will here essentially be concerned with this pronominal domain. Nevertheless, we will see that varieties of English may differ with respect to the sets of referents for which they use these pronouns. Moreover, some varieties distinguish only two genders on third person pronouns, while others have only one pronominal form. We begin by providing some background information on the category of gender. Following that, we will explore gender-marked pronouns in varieties of English. Finally, we will embark on a cross-linguistic survey of pronominal gender systems, which will allow us to assess English pronominal gender from a wider perspective.

Overview

We can define gender as a relationship of covariance between two or more sentential elements and a so-called ‘gender controller’ that determines the shape of the other elements (the ‘targets’ of the gender). Consider the examples from German in (1), where the relevant nouns (the gender controllers) determine the shape of the definite articles (the gender targets) that occur in front of them. In German, the controller of the gender also determines the shape of adjectives, pronouns, and some other elements.

  1. a. der Löffel ‘the spoon’ masculine gender

  2. b. die Gabel ‘the fork’ feminine gender

  3. c. das Messer ‘the knife’ neuter gender

Strictly speaking, English does not possess a comparable gender system, as only the pronouns of the third person show gender distinctions (he, she, it), though other sentential elements (e.g. adjectives) do not show gender marking. Moreover, the use of he, she, and it follows exclusively semantic principles, while in German and other languages with a gender system based on formal principles of gender assignment the occurrence of masculine, feminine, and neuter gender markers is primarily determined by the phonological and morphological properties of the gender-controlling noun (and therefore usually perceived as difficult to learn). The semantic principles regulating the distribution of he, she, and it are (i) humanness/animacy and (ii) sex, with male human referents triggering the use of he and female human referents the use of she, while all other referents take it, as shown in (2). An additional complication is that pronominal gender markers can occur without a preceding or following noun controlling their gender, since pronouns – besides their anaphoric uses – can also be used deictically. Hence, it is more correct to say that the distribution of these gendered pronouns is determined by the properties of the relevant referents, rather than the nouns encoding them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Varieties of English
A Typological Approach
, pp. 45 - 64
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audring, Jenny. 2008. Gender assignment and gender agreement: Evidence from pronominal gender languages. Morphology 18. 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audring, Jenny. 2009. Reinventing Pronoun Gender. Utrecht: LOT dissertation series.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2011. Sex-based and non-sex-based gender systems. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 31. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2004. Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In Unterbeck, Barbara and Rissanen, Matti (eds.), Trends in Grammar and Cognition, volume I: Approaches to Gender, 99–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce. 1997. Dutch: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gachelin, Jean-Marc. 1991. Gender and deixis in Southwestern Dialects. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 92. 83–93.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar, with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of Language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paddock, Harold. 1991. The actuation problem for gender change in Wessex versus Newfoundland. In Trudgill, Peter and Chambers, Jack K. (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, 29–46. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 2002. Using he and she for inanimate nouns in English: Questions of grammar and worldview. In Enfield, Nick (ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Language and Culture, 110–37. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1993. Syntactic categories and subcategories. In Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang, and Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication, 9), 646–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2002. Mass versus count: Pronominal gender in regional varieties of Germanic languages. Zeitschrift für Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 55(3). 213–33.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2008. Pronominal Gender in English: A Study of English Varieties from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter and Dolberg, Florian. 2011. From lexical to referential gender: An analysis of gender change in medieval English based on two historical documents. Folia Linguistica Historica 45(2). 489–534.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2011. Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 44. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Malcolm, RobertDixon, Ward (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages (Linguistic Series 22), 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Svartengren, T. Hilding. 1927. The feminine gender for inanimate things in Anglo-American. American Speech 3(2). 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Susanne. 2004. Gender in English Pronouns: Myth and Reality. . Accessed 22 December 2011.
Wahrig-Burfeind, Renate. 1989. Nominales und pronominales Genus im südlichen Nordseegebiet: Eine areallinguistische Untersuchung. Munich: Tūduv.Google Scholar
Bechert, Johannes. 1982. Grammatical gender in Europe: An areal study of a linguistic category. Papiere zur Linguistik 26(1). 23–34.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1905. A Grammar of the Dialect of West Somerset: Descriptive and Historical. (Bonner Beiträge zur Anglistik 18.) Bonn: P. Hanstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Mathiot, Madeleine and Roberts, Marjorie. 1979. Sex roles as revealed through referential gender in American English. In Mathiot, Madeleine (ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited, 1–47. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Stenroos, Merja. 2008. Order out of chaos? The English gender change in the southwest Midlands as a process of semantically based reorganization. English Language and Linguistics 12(3). 445–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Pronominal gender
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Pronominal gender
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Pronominal gender
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.004
Available formats
×