Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Locating the Discussion
- 2 Division, Democracy and Deliberation
- 3 Deliberating National Identity and Citizenship
- 4 The Requirement of Reciprocity
- 5 The Requirement of Publicity
- 6 Dilemmas of Exclusion
- 7 Civil Society and Political Institutions
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Locating the Discussion
- 2 Division, Democracy and Deliberation
- 3 Deliberating National Identity and Citizenship
- 4 The Requirement of Reciprocity
- 5 The Requirement of Publicity
- 6 Dilemmas of Exclusion
- 7 Civil Society and Political Institutions
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The idea of a specifically deliberative model of democracy, in which collective decisions are arrived at through public reasoning and discussion among equal citizens, is not new. Since about 1990, however, that idea has undergone a major revival – so much so that deliberative democracy is now firmly established as one of the most important positions in contemporary democratic theory. The reasons driving this revival are manifold, but three broad considerations stand out. First, many democratic theorists had become increasingly dissatisfied with the prevailing view that, because democracy imposes unrealistic demands on the time and attention of ordinary citizens, the business of making political decisions should be left to political elites who would then be held to account at election time. Democratic theorists sought to reject this elitist model of democracy in favour of a model that could allow ordinary citizens a much more effective say in the making of the political decisions by which they are bound. Second, the deliberative revival was also driven by a desire to afford a greater say to individuals and groups who, through no fault of their own, were politically marginalised. Partly, this was in response to the arguments of feminists and multiculturalists. But it was also in response to the more general failure of political elites to respond adequately to the interests and experiences of ordinary citizens or to advance the cause of social justice more generally. Finally, democratic theorists were also concerned with the quality of democracy itself.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Deliberative Democracy and Divided Societies , pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2006