Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:16:00.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Cervix: squamous cell carcinoma and precursors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Robert A. Soslow
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Teri A. Longacre
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
M. Fujiwara
Affiliation:
Fellow, Department of Pathology
C. S. Kong
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Cervical carcinoma is the second most common cancer in women worldwide and is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In the United States, although the incidence and mortality rates have significantly decreased since the introduction of the Papanicolaou smear (cervical cytology test) as a screening test in 1941, it is still sixth in cancer incidence and tenth in mortality rate for women of African-American and Hispanic descents. The discrepancy in rates worldwide and within the United States is largely due to differences in availability of cervical cancer screening programs.

Squamous cell carcinomas comprise the majority of the cancers of the cervix (~80%) and are the type that has benefitted most from cervical cytology screening. Infection with high-risk types of HPV has been shown to be a necessary but not sufficient cause of cervical cancer. There are 15 high-risk types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82), with HPV16 as the most common type in squamous cell carcinomas. Carcinogenesis involves progression from intraepithelial and in situ lesions to invasive carcinoma.

Two vaccines against HPV have been approved by the FDA. Gardasil (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ) is a quadrivalent vaccine against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18, and is approved for females aged 9–26 for prevention of cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancer caused by HPV types 16 and 18, and for females and males aged 9–26 for the prevention of anal cancer and genital warts caused by HPV types 6 and 11.

Type
Chapter
Information
Uterine Pathology , pp. 19 - 33
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Parkin, DM, Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Pisani, P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devesa, SS, Young, JL, Brinton, , Fraumeni, JF. Recent trends in cervix uteri cancer. Cancer 1989;64:2184–90.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devesa, SS, Blot, WJ, Stone, BJ, et al. Recent cancer trends in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:175–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2007 Incidence and Mortality Data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2009. (Accessed Oct 18 2011, at www.cdc.gov/uscs.)
Walboomers, JM, Jacobs, MV, Manos, MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12–19.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz, N, Bosch, FX, Sanjose, S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:518–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clifford, GM, Smith, JS, Plummer, M, Munoz, N, Franceschi, S. Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2003;88:63–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jancar, N, Kocjan, BJ, Poljak, M, Lunar, MM, Bokal, EV. Distribution of human papillomavirus genotypes in women with cervical cancer in Slovenia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;145:184–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1915–27.CrossRef
Paavonen, J, Naud, P, Salmeron, J, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet 2009;374:301–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer 2007;120:885–91.
Holmes, RS, Hawes, SE, Toure, P, et al. HIV infection as a risk factor for cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Senegal. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:2442–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vajdic, CM, McDonald, SP, McCredie, MR, et al. Cancer incidence before and after kidney transplantation. JAMA 2006;296:2823–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, TF. Cancer and viral infections in immunocompromised individuals. Int J Cancer 2009;125:1755–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, MG, Cragg, F, Wright, VC, et al. Cyto-histological correlates in a colposcopic clinic: a 1-year prospective study. Diagn Cytopathol 1991;7:477–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, GC, McGregor, SE, Duggan, MA, Nation, JG. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer. CMAJ 1997;157:513–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Lonky, NM, Sadeghi, M, Tsadik, GW, Petitti, D. The clinical significance of the poor correlation of cervical dysplasia and cervical malignancy with referral cytologic results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:560–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gullotta, G, Margariti, PA, Rabitti, C, et al. Cytology, histology, and colposcopy in the diagnosis of neoplastic non-invasive epithelial lesions of the cervix. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1997;18:36–8.Google Scholar
Pretorius, RG, Peterson, P, Azizi, F, Burchette, RJ. Subsequent risk and presentation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cancer after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1260–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holowaty, P, Miller, AB, Rohan, T, To, T. Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:252–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCredie, MR, Sharples, KJ, Paul, C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:425–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, MA, Benedet, JL, Odicino, F, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;95(Suppl 1):S43–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgado, G, Bundy, B, Zaino, R, et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1990;38:352–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bean, SM, Kurtycz, DF, Colgan, TJ. Recent developments in defining microinvasive and early invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2011;15:146–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostor, AG. Pandora's box or Ariadne's thread? Definition and prognostic significance of microinvasion in the uterine cervix. Squamous lesions. Pathol Annu 1995;30(Pt 2):103–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Ostor, AG, Rome, RM. Micro-invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a clinico-pathologic study of 200 cases with long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1994;4:257–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creasman, WT, Kohler, MF. Is lymph vascular space involvement an independent prognostic factor in early cervical cancer?Gynecol Oncol 2004;92:525–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, LB, Carcangiu, ML, Bradham, L, Schwartz, PE. Rapidly progressive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix coexisting with human immunodeficiency virus infection: clinical opinion. Gynecol Oncol 1991;41:255–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holcomb, K, Maiman, M, Dimaio, T, Gates, J. Rapid progression to invasive cervix cancer in a woman infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:848–50.Google Scholar
Wright, TC, Massad, LS, Dunton, CJ, et al. 2006 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Adenocarcinoma in Situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:340–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesic, V. Management of cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:832–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 35: Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:855–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koliopoulos, G, Sotiriadis, A, Kyrgiou, M, et al. Conservative surgical methods for FIGO stage IA2 squamous cervical carcinoma and their role in preserving women's fertility. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:469–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landoni, F, Maneo, A, Colombo, A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997;350:535–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoler, MH, Schiffman, M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. Jama 2001;285:1500–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, PE, Stoler, MH, Solomon, D, Schiffman, M. The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report. Am J Clin Pathol 2007;127:805–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carreon, JD, Sherman, ME, Guillen, D, et al. CIN2 is a much less reproducible and less valid diagnosis than CIN3: results from a histological review of population-based cervical samples. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007;26:441–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tseng, CJ, Pao, CC, Tseng, LH, et al. Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the uterine cervix: association with Epstein-Barr virus and human papillomavirus. Cancer 1997;80:91–7.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noel, J, Lespagnard, L, Fayt, I, Verhest, A, Dargent, J. Evidence of human papilloma virus infection but lack of Epstein-Barr virus in lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of uterine cervix: report of two cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 2001;32:135–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bais, AG, Kooi, S, Teune, TM, Ewing, PC, Ansink, AC. Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the uterine cervix: absence of Epstein-Barr virus, but presence of a multiple human papillomavirus infection. Gynecol Oncol 2005;97:716–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, A, Tsai, CN, Hsueh, S, et al. Does Epstein-Barr virus play a role in lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the uterine cervix?Int J Gynecol Pathol 2009;28:279–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecorelli, S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105:103–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bader, AA, Winter, R, Haas, J, Tamussino, KF. Where to look for the sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:678.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, SH, Xiong, Y, Wei, M, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection using methylene blue in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106:147–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakuragi, N, Satoh, C, Takeda, N, et al. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer 1999;85:1547–54.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, CS, Balzer, BL, Troxell, ML, Patterson, BK, Longacre, TA. p16INK4A immunohistochemistry is superior to HPV in situ hybridization for the detection of high-risk HPV in atypical squamous metaplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:33–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keating, JT, Cviko, A, Riethdorf, S, et al. Ki-67, cyclin E, and p16INK4 are complimentary surrogate biomarkers for human papilloma virus-related cervical neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:884–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sano, T, Oyama, T, Kashiwabara, K, Fukuda, T, Nakajima, T. Expression status of p16 protein is associated with human papillomavirus oncogenic potential in cervical and genital lesions. Am J Pathol 1998;153:1741–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaes, R, Friedrich, T, Spitkovsky, D, et al. Overexpression of p16(INK4A) as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri. Int J Cancer 2001;92:276–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalof, AN, Evans, MF, Simmons-Arnold, L, Beatty, BG, Cooper, K. p16INK4A immunoexpression and HPV in situ hybridization signal patterns: potential markers of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:674–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, GP, Stemmer-Rachamimov, AO, Shaw, J, et al. Immunohistochemical survey of p16INK4A expression in normal human adult and infant tissues. Lab Invest 1999;79:1137–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinto, AP, Schlecht, NF, Woo, TY, Crum, CP, Cibas, ES. Biomarker (ProEx C, p16(INK4A), and MiB-1) distinction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion from its mimics. Mod Pathol 2008;21:1067–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badr, RE, Walts, AE, Chung, F, Bose, S. BD ProEx C: a sensitive and specific marker of HPV-associated squamous lesions of the cervix. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:899–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conesa-Zamora, P, Domenech-Peris, A, Ortiz-Reina, S, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of ProEx C in human papillomavirus-induced lesions of the cervix. J Clin Pathol 2009;62:159–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, J, Liu, H, Wilkerson, M, et al. Evaluation of p16INK4a, minichromosome maintenance protein 2, DNA topoisomerase IIalpha, ProEX C, and p16INK4a/ProEX C in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Hum Pathol 2007;38:1335–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirog, EC, Baergen, RN, Soslow, RA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions is improved with MIB-1 immunostaining. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:70–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iaconis, L, Hyjek, E, Ellenson, LH, Pirog, EC. p16 and Ki-67 immunostaining in atypical immature squamous metaplasia of the uterine cervix: correlation with human papillomavirus detection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:1343–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruse, AJ, Baak, JP, Bruin, PC, et al. Ki-67 immunoquantitation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a sensitive marker for grading. J Pathol 2001;193:48–54.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiao, X, Bhuiya, TA, Spitzer, M. Differentiating high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion from atrophy in postmenopausal women using Ki-67, cyclin E, and p16 immunohistochemical analysis. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2005;9:100–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorpe, J, Moerman, P. Placental site nodule of the uterine cervix. Histopathology 1996;29:379–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RH, Kurman, RJ, Scully, RE. Placental site nodules and plaques. A clinicopathologic analysis of 20 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1990;14:1001–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, TL, Seidman, JD, Kurman, RJ, Shih, I eM. Cyclin E and p16 immunoreactivity in epithelioid trophoblastic tumor – an aid in differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:1105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shih, IM, Seidman, JD, Kurman, RJ. Placental site nodule and characterization of distinctive types of intermediate trophoblast. Hum Pathol 1999;30:687–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadare, O, Parkash, V, Carcangiu, ML, Hui, P. Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor: clinicopathological features with an emphasis on uterine cervical involvement. Mod Pathol 2006;19:75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×