Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:01:08.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Neuroblastoma

from PART II - CLINICAL RESEARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Nai-Kong Cheung
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, United States
Brian H. Kushner
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, United States
David Lyden
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Danny R. Welch
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Bethan Psaila
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

Neuroblastoma (NB) originates from neural crest precursors in the adrenal medulla, the sympathetic ganglia in the neck, mediastinum, retroperitoneum, or pelvis. It is the most common extracranial pediatric solid tumor and the most common neoplasm among infants. More than 90 percent of the more than 700 cases diagnosed yearly in the United States are in children younger than five years of age.

NB has a notorious reputation among solid tumors of childhood because of its massive and widespread tumor burden. Stage for stage, however, this embryonal neoplasm of the sympathetic nervous system has become one of the most curable pediatric solid tumors. In fact, more than 90 percent of patients with localized NBs, including those with tumors spreading to regional lymph nodes, will survive, often with little or no cytotoxic therapy. Cure rates of metastatic NB exceed 90 percent in infants (usually treated with low-dose chemotherapy) and approximately 25 percent in toddlers. In contrast to NB, osteomedullary metastases result in less than a 5 percent chance of cure for other pediatric solid tumors. The long-held view that many cases spontaneously regress or mature into asymptomatic ganglioneuromas was confirmed by the findings of urine catecholamine screening programs in infants. These programs yielded 50 percent to 100 percent more cases than the unscreened population. Most patients identified had the low-risk forms of the disease, and the incidence of high-risk disease was not reduced.

Environmental causative factors have not been identified, nor has NB been significantly associated with any other disease or condition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cancer Metastasis
Biologic Basis and Therapeutics
, pp. 264 - 277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Park, JR, Eggert, A, Caron, H (2008) Neuroblastoma: biology, prognosis, and treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am. 55: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodeur, G, Pritchard, J, Berthold, F et al. (1993) Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 11: 1466–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH (2004) Neuroblastoma: a disease requiring a multitude of imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 45: 1172–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH, Yeung, HWD, Larson, SM et al. (2001) Extending positron emission tomography scan utility to high-risk neuroblastoma: Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as sole imaging modality in follow up of patients. J Clin Oncol. 19: 3397–3405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, WG, Gao, RN, Shuster, JJ et al. (2002) Screening of infants and mortality due to neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 346: 1041–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodeur, GM (2003) Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat Rev Cancer. 3: 203–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maris, JM, Mosse, YP, Bradfield, JP et al. (2008) Chromosome 6p22 locus associated with clinically aggressive neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 358: 2585–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosse, YP, Laudenslager, M, Longo, L et al. (2008) Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene. Nature. 455: 930–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DuBois, SG, Kalika, Y, Lukens, JN et al. (1999) Metastatic sites in stage IV and IVS neuroblastoma correlate with age, tumor biology, and survival. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 21: 181–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, N-KV, Cohn, SL (2005) Neuroblastoma. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, K, Kushner, BH, Allen, JC et al. (2004) Favorable-biology neuroblastoma presenting with leptomeningeal metastases?: a case presentation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 26: 703–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, EM, Cassady, JR, Frantz, CN et al. (1985) Stage IV-N: A favorable subset of children with metastatic neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 13: 194–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London, WB, Castleberry, RP, Matthay, KK et al. (2005) Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 23: 6459–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, ML, Lal, A, Seeger, RC et al. (2005) Favorable prognosis for patients 12 to 18 months of age with stage 4 nonamplified MYCN neuroblastoma: a Children's Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 23: 6474–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH, Kramer, K, Cheung, NK (2002) Chronic neuroblastoma. Cancer. 95: 1366–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, B, Kramer, K, LaQuaglia, M et al. (2003) Neuroblastoma in adolescents and adults: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Med Pediatr Oncol. 41: 508–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas-Kogan, DA, Swift, PS, Selch, M et al. (2003) Impact of radiotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma: a Children's Cancer Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 56: 28–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH, Wolden, S, LaQuaglia, MP et al. (2001) Hyperfractionated low-dose radiotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma after intensive chemotherapy and surgery. J Clin Oncol. 19: 2821–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH, Yeh, SD, Kramer, K et al (2003). Impact of metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy on assessing response of high-risk neuroblastoma to dose-intensive induction chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 21: 1082–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, B, Kramer, BS, Modak, S et al. (2008) Sensitivity of surveillance studies for detecting aysmtomatic and unsuspected relapse of high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 27: 1041–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, K, Kushner, B, Heller, G et al. (2001) Neuroblastoma metastatic to the central nervous system. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience and a literature review. Cancer. 91: 1510–9.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthay, KK, Brisse, H, Couanet, D et al. (2003) Central nervous system metastases in neuroblastoma: radiologic, clinical, and biologic features in 23 patients. Cancer. 98: 155–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, AD, Pinkerton, CR, Lewis, IJ et al. (2008) High-dose rapid and standard induction chemotherapy for patients aged over 1 year with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 9: 247–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthold, F, Boos, J, Burdach, S et al. (2005) Myeloablative megatherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue versus oral maintenance chemotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 6: 649–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardi, B, Nicolas, B, Boni, L et al. (2003) Disseminated neuroblastoma in children older than one year at diagnosis: comparable results with three consecutive high-dose protocols adopted by the Italian Co-Operative Group for Neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 21: 1592–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodeur, GM, Hayes, FA, Green, AA et al. (1987) Consistent N-myc copy number in simultaneous or consecutive neuroblastoma samples from sixty individual patients. Cancer Res. 47: 4248–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Heller, G (1991) Chemotherapy dose intensity correlates strongly with response, median survival and median progression-free survival in metastatic neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 9: 1050–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH, Kramer, K, LaQuaglia, MP et al. (2004) Reduction from seven to five cycles of intensive induction chemotherapy in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 22: 4888–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quaglia, MP, Kushner, BH, Su, W et al. (2004) The impact of gross total resection on local control and survival in high-risk neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg. 39: 412–7; discussion 412–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthay, KK, Villablanca, JG, Seeger, RC et al. (1999) Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and 13-cis-retinoic acid. Children's Cancer Group. N Engl J Med. 341: 1165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladenstein, R, Potschger, U, Hartman, O et al. (2008) 28 years of high-dose therapy and SCT for neuroblastoma in Europe: lessons from more than 4000 procedures. Bone Marrow Transplant. 41 Suppl 2: S118–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, J, Cotterill, SJ, Germond, SM et al. (2005) High dose melphalan in the treatment of advanced neuroblastoma: results of a randomised trial (ENSG-1) by the European Neuroblastoma Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 44: 348–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fish, JD, Grupp, SA (2008) Stem cell transplantation for neuroblastoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 41: 159–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, RE, Li, S, Medeiros-Nancarrow, C et al. (2006) High-risk neuroblastoma treated with tandem autologous peripheral-blood stem cell-supported transplantation: long-term survival update. J Clin Oncol. 24: 2891–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbie, WL, Moshang, T, Carlson, CA et al. (2008) Late effects in survivors of tandem peripheral blood stem cell transplant for high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 51: 679–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthay, KK, Edeline, V, Lumbroso, J et al. (2003) Correlation of early metastatic response by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy with overall response and event-free survival in stage IV neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 21: 2486–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Lazarus, H, Miraldi, FD et al. (1987) Ganglioside GD2 specific monoclonal antibody 3F8: a phase I study in patients with neuroblastoma and malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 5: 1430–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saleh, MN, Khazaeli, MB, Wheeler, RH et al. (1992) A Phase I trial of the murine monoclonal anti-GD2 antibody 14.G2a in metastatic melanoma. Cancer Res. 52: 4342–47.Google Scholar
Yu, A, Uttenreuther-Fischer, M, Huang, C-S et al. (1998) Phase I trial of a human-mouse chimeric anti-disialoganglioside monoclonal antibody ch14.18 in patients with refractory neuroblastoma and osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 16: 2169–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, A, Gilman, AL, Ozkaynak, MF et al. (2010) Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 363: 1324–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilman, AL, Ozkaynak, MF, Matthay, KK et al. (2009) Phase I study of ch14.18 with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 in children with neuroblastoma after autologous bone marrow transplantation or stem-cell rescue: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 27: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miraldi, FD, Nelson, AD, Kraly, C et al. (1986) Diagnostic imaging of human neuroblastoma with radiolabeled antibody. Radiology. 161: 413–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeh, SD, Larson, SM, Burch, L et al. (1991) Radioimmunodetection of neuroblastoma with iodine-131–3F8: correlation with biopsy, iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and standard diagnostic modalities. J Nucl Med. 32: 769–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Kushner, BH, Yeh, SD et al. (1998) 3F8 monoclonal antibody treatment of patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a Phase II study. Int J Oncol. 12: 1299–1306.Google ScholarPubMed
Arbit, E, Cheung, NKV, Yeh, SDJ et al. (1995) Quantitative studies of monoclonal antibody targeting to disialoganglioside GD2 in human brain tumors. Eur J Nucl Med. 22: 419–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Kushner, BH, Cheung, IY et al. (1998) Anti-G(D2) antibody treatment of minimal residual stage 4 neuroblastoma diagnosed at more than 1 year of age. J Clin Oncol. 16: 3053–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Guo, HF, Heller, G et al (2000). Induction of Ab3 and Ab3' antibody was associated with long-term survival after anti-G(D2) antibody therapy of stage 4 neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 6: 2653–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH, Kramer, K, Cheung, NKV (2001) Phase II trial of the anti-G(D2) monoclonal antibody 3F8 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 19: 4189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Sowers, R, Vickers, AJ et al. (2006) FCGR2A polymorphism is correlated with clinical outcome after immunotherapy of neuroblastoma with anti-GD2 antibody and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Clin Oncol. 24: 2885–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munn, DH, Cheung, NK (1989) Antibody-dependent antitumor cytotoxicity by human monocytes cultured with recombinant macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Induction of efficient antibody-mediated antitumor cytotoxicity not detected by isotope release assays. J Exp Med. 170: 511–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushner, BH, Cheung, NK (1989) GM-CSF enhances 3F8 monoclonal antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against human melanoma and neuroblastoma. Blood. 73: 1936–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Weng, WK, Levy, R (2003) Two immunoglobulin G fragment C receptor polymorphisms independently predict response to rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 21: 3940–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cartron, G, Dacheux, L, Salles, G et al. (2002) Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcgammaRIIIa gene. Blood. 99: 754–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tax, WJ, Tamboer, WP, Jacobs, CW et al. (1997) Role of polymorphic Fc receptor Fc gammaRIIa in cytokine release and adverse effects of murine IgG1 anti-CD3/T cell receptor antibody (WT31). Transplantation. 63: 106–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denomme, GA, Warkentin, TE, Horsewood, P et al. (1997) Activation of platelets by sera containing IgG1 heparin-dependent antibodies: an explanation for the predominance of the Fc gammaRIIa “low responder” (his131) gene in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Lab Clin Med. 130: 278–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saarinen, UM, Coccia, PF, Gerson, SL et al. (1985) Eradication of neuroblastoma cells in vitro by monoclonal antibody and human complement: method for purging autologous bone marrow. Cancer Res. 45: 5969–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Walter, EI, Smith-Mensah, WH et al. (1988) Decay-accelerating factor protects human tumor cells from complement-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. J Clin Invest. 81: 1122–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, S, Caragine, T, Cheung, NKV et al. (2000) CD59 expressed on a tumor cell surface modulates decay-accelarating factor expression and enhances tumor growth in a rat model of human neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 60: 3013–8.Google Scholar
Kushner, BH, Cheung, NK (1992) Absolute requirement of CD11/CD18 adhesion molecules, FcRII and the phosphatidylinositol-linked FcRIII for monoclonal antibody-mediated neutrophil antihuman tumor cytotoxicity. Blood. 79: 1484–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Metelitsa, LS, Gillies, SD, Super, M et al. (2002) Antidisialoganglioside/granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor fusion protein facilitates neutrophil antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and depends on FcgammaRII (CD32) and Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) for enhanced effector cell adhesion and azurophil granule exocytosis. Blood. 99: 4166–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, GD (2000) Regulation of the adhesion versus cytotoxic functions of the Mac-1/CR3/alphaMbeta2-integrin glycoprotein. Crit Rev Immunol. 20: 197–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz de Stahl, T, Dahlstrom, J, Carroll, MC et al. (2003) A role for complement in feedback enhancement of antibody responses by IgG3. J Exp Med. 197: 1183–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handgretinger, R, Baader, P, Dopfer, R et al. (1992) A phase I study of neuroblastoma with the anti-ganglioside GD2 antibody 14.G2a. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 35: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handgretinger, R, Anderson, K, Lang, P et al. (1995) A Phase I study of human/mouse chimeric antiganglioside GD2 antibody ch 14.18 in patients with neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 31: 261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, T, Hero, B, Faldum, A et al. (2004) Consolidation treatment with chimeric anti-GD2-antibody ch14.18 in children older than 1 year with metastatic neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 22: 3549–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozkaynak, MF, Sondel, PM, Krailo, MD et al. (2000) Phase I study of chimeric human/murine anti-ganglioside G(D2) monoclonal antibody (ch14.18) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in children with neuroblastoma immediately after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a Children's Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 18: 4077–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushner, B, Kramer, K, Modak, S et al. (2007) Anti-GD2 antibody 3F8 plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for primary refractory neuroblastoma (NB) in the bone marrow (BM). Proc American Soc Clin Oncol. 25: 526s.Google Scholar
Armitage, JO (1998) Emerging applications of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 92: 4491–508.Google ScholarPubMed
Charak, BS, Agah, R, Mazumder, A (1993) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in bone marrow macrophages: application in bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 81: 3474–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Ragnhammar, P, Frodin, JE, Trotta, PP et al. (1994) Cytotoxicity of white blood cells activated by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and macrophage-colony-stimulating factor against tumor cells in the presence of various monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 39: 254–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chachoua, A, Oratz, R, Hoogmoed, R et al. (1994) Monocyte activation following systemic administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Immunother Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 15: 217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batova, A, Kamps, A, Gillies, SD et al. (1999) The ch14.18-GM-CSF fusion protein is effective at mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro. Clin Cancer Res. 5: 4259–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Tepper, RI, Coffman, RL, Leder, P (1992) An eosinophil-dependent mechanism for the antitumor effect of interleukin-4. Science. 257: 548–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, CJ (1992) Interleukin-5, eosinophils, and disease. Blood. 79: 3101–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheung, NK, Kushner, B, Kramer, K et al. (2008) Anti-GD2 murine monoclonal antibody 3F8 changed the natural history of high risk neuroblastoma. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Immunotherapy in Pediatric Oncology, Houston, TX, October 11, 2010.
Larson, SM, Divgi, C, Sgouros, G et al. (2000) Monoclonal antibodies: Basic principles – Radioisotope conjugates. In DeVita, VT, Hellman, S, Rosenberg, SA (eds): Biologic Therapy of Cancer – Principles and Practice. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp. 396–412.Google Scholar
Kramer, K, Cheung, NK, Humm, J et al. (1997) Pharmacokinetics and acute toxicology of intraventricular 131 I-monoclonal antibody targeting disialoganglioside in non-human primates. J Neurooncol. 35: 101–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, K, Humm, JL, Souweidane, MM et al. (2007) Phase I study of targeted radioimmunotherapy for leptomeningeal cancers using intra-Ommaya 131-I-3F8. J Clin Oncol. 25: 5465–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modak, S, Kramer, K, Gultekin, SH et al. (2001) Monoclonal antibody 8H9 targets a novel cell surface antigen expressed by a wide spectrum of human solid tumors. Cancer Res. 61: 4048–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Kramer, K, Modak, S, Kushner, BH et al. (2007) Radioimmunotherapy of metastatic cancer to the central nervous system: Phase I study of intrathecal 131I-8H9. American Association for Cancer Research LB-4 (presentation).Google Scholar
Kramer, K, Kushner, BH, Modak, S et al. (2008) Effective Intrathecal Radioimmunotherapy-Based Salvage Regimen for Metastatic Central Nervous System (CNS) Neuroblastoma (NB), ISPNO 2008.
Klingebiel, T, Berthold, F, Treuner, J et al. (1991) Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in treatment of 47 patients with neuroblastoma: results of the German Neuroblastoma Trial. Med Pediatr Oncol. 19: 84–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lashford, LS, Lewis, IJ, Fielding, SL et al. (1992) Phase I/II study of iodine 131 metaiodobenzylguanidine in chemoresistant neuroblastoma: a United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group investigation. J Clin Oncol. 10: 1889–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthay, KK, DeSantes, K, Hasegawa, B et al. (1998) Phase I dose escalation of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with autologous bone marrow support in refractory neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 16: 229–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garaventa, A, Bellagamba, O, Lo Piccolo, MS et al. (1999)131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) therapy for residual neuroblastoma: a monoinstitutional experience with 43 patients. Br J Cancer. 81: 1378–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, TI, Brophy, P, Hickeson, M et al. (2003) Targeted radiotherapy with submyeloablative doses of 131I-MIBG is effective for disease palliation in highly refractory neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 25: 769–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, JP, Maris, JM, Kersun, LS et al. (2005) Tumor response and toxicity with multiple infusions of high-dose 131I-MIBG for refractory neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 44: 232–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messina, JA, Cheng, SC, Franc, BL et al. (2006) Evaluation of semi-quantitative scoring system for metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scans in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 47: 865–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraker, J, Hoefnagel, KA, Verschuur, AC et al. (2008) Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine as initial induction therapy in stage 4 neuroblastoma patients over 1 year of age. Eur J Cancer. 44: 551–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modak, S, Pandit-Taskar, N, Kushner, BH et al. (2008) Transient sialoadenitis: a complication of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 50: 1271–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garaventa, A, Gambini, C, Villavecchia, G et al. Second malignancies in children with neuroblastoma after combined treatment with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Cancer 97:1332–8, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, B, Vora, A, Huberty, J et al. (2003) Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and leukemia following 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for relapsed neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 25: 543–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klingebiel, T, Bader, P, Bares, R et al. (1998) Treatment of neuroblastoma stage 4 with 131I-meta-iodo-benzylguanidine, high-dose chemotherapy and immunotherapy. A pilot study. Eur J Cancer. 34: 1398–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastrangelo, S, Tornesello, A, Diociaiuti, L et al. (2001) Treatment of advanced neuroblastoma: feasibility and therapeutic potential of a novel approach combining 131-I-MIBG and multiple drug chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 84: 460–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miano, M, Garaventa, A, Pizzitola, MR et al. (2001) Megatherapy combining I(131) metaiodobenzylguanidine and high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic progenitor cell rescue for neuroblastoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 27: 571–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanik, GA, Levine, JE, Matthay, KK et al. (2002) Pilot study of iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine in combination with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell support for the treatment of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 20: 2142–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluskey, AG, Boyd, M, Ross, SC et al. (2005) [131I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine and topotecan combination treatment of tumors expressing the noradrenaline transporter. Clin Cancer Res. 11: 7929–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthay, KK, Tan, JC, Villablanca, JG et al. (2006) Phase I dose escalation of iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in refractory neuroblastoma: a new approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol. 24: 500–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linney, E (1992) Retinoic acid receptors: transcription factors modulating gene regulation, development, and differentiation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 27: 309–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C, Einhorn, PA, Reynolds, CP (1994) Expression of retinoic acid receptors alpha, beta, and gamma in human neuroblastoma cell lines. Prog Clin Biol Res. 385: 221–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Thiele, CJ, Reynolds, CP, Israel, MA (1985) Decreased expression of N-myc precedes retinoic acid-induced morphological differentiation of human neuroblastoma. Nature. 313: 404–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiele, CJ, Israel, MA (1988) Regulation of N-myc expression is a critical event controlling the ability of human neuroblasts to differentiate. Exp Cell Biol. 56: 321–33.Google Scholar
Matsuo, T, Thiele, CJ (1998) p27Kip1: a key mediator of retinoic acid induced growth arrest in the SMS-KCNR human neuroblastoma cell line. Oncogene. 16: 3337–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, M, Matsuo, T, Stauffer, J et al. Retinoic acid decreases targeting of p27 for degradation via an N-myc-dependent decrease in p27 phosphorylation and an N-myc-independent decrease in Skp2. Cell Death Differ. 10: 230–9. (2003)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abemayor, E, Sidell, N (1989) Human neuroblastoma cell lines as models for the in vitro study of neoplastic and neuronal cell differentiation. Environ Health Perspect. 80: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, JA, Imeson, J, Ellershaw, C et al. (2000) A randomized trial of 13-Cis retinoic acid in children with advanced neuroblastoma after high-dose therapy. Br J Cancer. 83: 1124–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vertuani, S, Geer, A, Levitsky, V et al. (2003) Retinoids act as multistep modulators of the major histocompatibility class I presentation pathway and sensitize neuroblastomas to cytotoxic lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 63: 8006–13.Google Scholar
Ponzoni, M, Bocca, P, Chiesa, V et al. (1995) Differential effects of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide and retinoic acid on neuroblastoma cells: apoptosis versus differentiation. Cancer Res. 55: 853–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, CP, Wang, Y, Melton, LJ et al. (2000) Retinoic-acid-resistant neuroblastoma cell lines show altered MYC regulation and high sensitivity to fenretinide. Med Pediatr Oncol. 35: 597–602.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villablanca, JG, Krailo, MD, Ames, MM et al. (2006) Phase I trial of oral fenretinide in children with high-risk solid tumors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group (CCG 09709). J Clin Oncol. 24: 3423–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maurer, BJ, Kalous, O, Yesair, DW et al. (2007) Improved oral delivery of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide with a novel LYM-X-SORB organized lipid complex. Clin Cancer Res. 13: 3079–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernards, R (1991) N-myc disrupts protein kinase C-mediated signal transduction in neuroblastoma. EMBO J. 10: 1119–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Akeson, R, Bernards, R (1990) N-myc down regulates neural cell adhesion molecule expression in rat neuroblastoma. Mol Cell Biol. 10: 2012–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J, Mani, SA, Weinberg, RA (2006) Exploring a new twist on tumor metastasis. Cancer Res. 66: 4549–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puisieux, A, Valsesia-Wittmann, S, Ansieau, S (2006) A twist for survival and cancer progression. Br J Cancer. 94: 13–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valsesia-Wittmann, S, Magdeleine, M, Dupasquier, S et al. (2004) Oncogenic cooperation between H-Twist and N-Myc overrides failsafe programs in cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 6: 625–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niitsu, N, Okabe-Kado, J, Okamoto, M et al. (2001) Serum nm23-H1 protein as a prognostic factor in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 97: 1202–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfried, MB, Veenstra, M, v Sluis, P et al (2002). The N-myc and c-myc downstream pathways include the chromosome 17q genes nm23-H1 and nm23-H2. Oncogene. 21: 2097–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florenes, VA, Aamdal, S, Myklebost, O et al. (1992) Levels of nm23 messenger RNA in metastatic malignant melanomas: inverse correlation to disease progression. Cancer Res. 52: 6088–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Geiger, TR, Peeper, DS (2005) The neurotrophic receptor TrkB in anoikis resistance and metastasis: a perspective. Cancer Res. 65: 7033–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecht, M, Schulte, JH, Eggert, A et al. (2005) The neurotrophin receptor TrkB cooperates with c-Met in enhancing neuroblastoma invasiveness. Carcinogenesis. 26: 2105–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stupack, DG, Teitz, T, Potter, MD et al. (2006) Potentiation of neuroblastoma metastasis by loss of caspase-8. Nature. 439: 95–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teitz, T, Stupack, DG, Lahti, JM (2006) Halting neuroblastoma metastasis by controlling integrin-mediated death. Cell Cycle. 5: 681–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taichman, RS, Cooper, C, Keller, ET et al. (2002) Use of the stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 pathway in prostate cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Res. 62: 1832–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, HV, Hicks, J, Okcu, MF et al. (2004) CXCR4 expression in neuroblastoma primary tumors is associated with clinical presentation of bone and bone marrow metastases. J Pediatr Surg. 39: 1506–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geminder, H, Sagi-Assif, O, Goldberg, L et al. (2001) A possible role for CXCR4 and its ligand, the CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1, in the development of bone marrow metastases in neuroblastoma. J Immunol. 167: 4747–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevo, I, Sagi-Assif, O, Meshel, T et al. (2004) The tumor microenvironment: CXCR4 is associated with distinct protein expression patterns in neuroblastoma cells. Immunol Lett. 92: 163–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansford, LM, McKee, AE, Zhang, L et al. (2007) Neuroblastoma cells isolated from bone marrow metastases contain a naturally enriched tumor-initiating cell. Cancer Res. 67: 11234–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Airoldi, I, Raffaghello, L, Piovan, E et al. (2006) CXCL12 does not attract CXCR4+ human metastatic neuroblastoma cells: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 12: 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, SM, Flomenberg, N, Vesole, DH et al. (2004) Rapid mobilization of CD34+ cells following administration of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 to patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 22: 1095–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vande Broek, I, Asosingh, K, Vanderkerken, K et al. (2003) Chemokine receptor CCR2 is expressed by human multiple myeloma cells and mediates migration to bone marrow stromal cell-produced monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP-1, -2 and -3. Br J Cancer. 88: 855–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ara, T, DeClerck, YA (2006) Mechanisms of invasion and metastasis in human neuroblastoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 25: 645–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, MD, Bordow, SB, Marshall, GM et al. (1996) Expression of the gene for multidrug-resistance-associated protein and outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 334: 231–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keshelava, N, Zuo, JJ, Chen, P et al. (2001) Loss of p53 function confers high-level multidrug resistance in neuroblastoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 61: 6185–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Tweddle, DA, Pearson, AD, Haber, M et al. (2003) The p53 pathway and its inactivation in neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 197: 93–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scala, S, Wosikowski, K, Giannakakou, P et al. (1996) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor protects neuroblastoma cells from vinblastine toxicity. Cancer Res. 56: 3737–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Jaboin, J, Kim, CJ, , Kaplan DR et al. (2002) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor activation of TrkB protects neuroblastoma cells from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis via phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase pathway. Cancer Res. 62: 6756–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Evans, AE, Kisselbach, KD, Yamashiro, DJ et al. (1999) Antitumor activity of CEP-751 (KT-6587) on human neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma xenografts. Clin Cancer Res. 5: 3594–602.Google ScholarPubMed
Schinkel, AH, Jonker, JW (2003) Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family: an overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 55: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, G, Wielinga, P, Zelcer, N et al. (2003) Characterization of the transport of nucleoside analog drugs by the human multidrug resistance proteins MRP4 and MRP5. Mol Pharmacol. 63: 1094–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, MD, Smith, J, Tanabe, K et al. (2005) Expression of multidrug transporter MRP4/ABCC4 is a marker of poor prognosis in neuroblastoma and confers resistance to irinotecan in vitro. Mol Cancer Ther. 4: 547–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalak, E, Villunger, A, Erlacher, M et al. (2005) Death squads enlisted by the tumour suppressor p53. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 331: 786–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barak, Y, Juven, T, Haffner, R et al. (1993) mdm2 expression is induced by wild type p53 activity. EMBO J. 12: 461–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Honda, R, Yasuda, H (1999) Association of p19(ARF) with Mdm2 inhibits ubiquitin ligase activity of Mdm2 for tumor suppressor p53. EMBO J. 18: 22–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, DP (1992) Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature. 358: 15–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, J, Bell, E, Pearson, AD et al. (2006) Increased frequency of aberrations in the p53/MDM2/p14(ARF) pathway in neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse. Cancer Res. 66: 2138–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, Q (2006) Restoring p53-mediated apoptosis in cancer cells: new opportunities for cancer therapy. Drug Resist Updat. 9: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwahara, T, Fujimoto, J, Wen, D et al. (1997) Molecular characterization of ALK, a receptor tyrosine kinase expressed specifically in the nervous system. Oncogene. 14: 439–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiarle, R, Voena, C, Ambrogio, C et al. (2008) The anaplastic lymphoma kinase in the pathogenesis of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 8: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamant, L, Pulford, K, Bischof, D et al. (2000) Expression of the ALK tyrosine kinase gene in neuroblastoma. Am J Pathol. 156: 1711–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDermott, U, Iafrate, AJ, Gray, NS et al. (2008) Genomic alterations of anaplastic lymphoma kinase may sensitize tumors to anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 68: 3389–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, RE, Sanda, T, Hanna, M et al. (2008) Activating mutations in ALK provide a therapeutic target in neuroblastoma. Nature. 455: 975–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janoueix-Lerosey, I, Lequin, D, Brugieres, L et al. (2008) Somatic and germline activating mutations of the ALK kinase receptor in neuroblastoma. Nature. 455: 967–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y, Takita, J, Choi, YL et al. (2008) Oncogenic mutations of ALK kinase in neuroblastoma. Nature. 455: 971–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eng, C (2008) Cancer: A ringleader identified. Nature. 455: 883–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggert, A, Ikegaki, N, Kwiatkowski, J et al. (2000) High-level expression of angiogenic factors is associated with advanced tumor stage in human neuroblastomas. Clin Cancer Res. 6: 1900–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Ribatti, D, Alessandri, G, Baronio, M et al. (2001) Inhibition of neuroblastoma-induced angiogenesis by fenretinide. Int J Cancer. 94: 314–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shusterman, S, Grupp, SA, Barr, R et al. (2001) The angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 effectively inhibits human neuroblastoma xenograft growth, especially in the setting of subclinical disease. Clin Cancer Res. 7: 977–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Chesler, L, Goldenberg, DD, Seales, IT et al. (2007) Malignant progression and blockade of angiogenesis in a murine transgenic model of neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 67: 9435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaicker, S, McCrudden, KW, Beck, L et al. (2003) Thalidomide is anti-angiogenic in a xenograft model of neuroblastoma. Int J Oncol. 23: 1651–5.Google Scholar
Jouanneau, E, Alberti, L, Nejjari, M et al. (2001) Lack of antitumor activity of recombinant endostatin in a human neuroblastoma xenograft model. J Neurooncol. 51: 11–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidoff, AM, Leary, MA, Ng, CY et al. (2001) Autocrine expression of both endostatin and green fluorescent protein provides a synergistic antitumor effect in a murine neuroblastoma model. Cancer Gene Ther. 8: 537–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, ES, Soffer, SZ, Huang, J et al. (2002) Distinct response of experimental neuroblastoma to combination antiangiogenic strategies. J Pediatr Surg. 37: 518–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, ES, Serur, A, Huang, J et al. (2002) Potent VEGF blockade causes regression of coopted vessels in a model of neuroblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99: 11399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, JL, , Adamson PC, Reid, JM et al. (2008) Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of bevacizumab in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 26: 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castriconi, R, Dondero, A, Augugliaro, R et al. (2004) Identification of 4Ig-B7-H3 as a neuroblastoma-associated molecule that exerts a protective role from an NK cell-mediated lysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101: 12640–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castriconi, R, Dondero, A, Cilli, M et al. (2007) Human NK cell infusions prolong survival of metastatic human neuroblastoma-bearing NOD/scid mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 56: 1733–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JJ, Yang, JS, Dentchev, T et al. (2000) Chemokine gene adjuvants can modulate immune responses induced by DNA vaccines. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 20: 487–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anfossi, N, Andre, P, Guia, S et al. (2006) Human NK cell education by inhibitory receptors for MHC class I. Immunity. 25: 331–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, J, Heller, G, , Chewning J et al. (2007) Hierarchy of the human natural killer cell response is determined by class and quantity of inhibitory receptors for self-HLA-B and HLA-C ligands. J Immunol. 179: 5977–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggeri, L, Mancusi, A, Burchielli, E et al. (2008) NK cell alloreactivity and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 40: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggeri, L, Capanni, M, , Urbani E et al. (2002) Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science. 295: 2097–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giebel, S, Locatelli, F, Lamparelli, T et al. (2003) Survival advantage with KIR ligand incompatibility in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors. Blood. 102: 814–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, JR, Digiusto, DL, Slovak, M et al. (2007) Adoptive transfer of chimeric antigen receptor re-directed cytolytic T lymphocyte clones in patients with neuroblastoma. Mol Ther. 15: 825–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pule, MA, Savoldo, B, Myers, GD et al. (2008) Virus-specific T cells engineered to coexpress tumor-specific receptors: persistence and antitumor activity in individuals with neuroblastoma. Nature Medicine 14: 1264–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousseau, RF, Haight, AE, Hirschmann-Jax, C et al. (2003) Local and systemic effects of an allogeneic tumor cell vaccine combining transgenic human lymphotactin with interleukin-2 in patients with advanced or refractory neuroblastoma. Blood. 101: 1718–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, HV, Strother, D, Mei, Z et al. (2008) A phase 1/2 study of autologous neuroblastoma tumor cells genetically modified to secrete IL-2 in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. J Immunother. 31: 812–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fest, S, Huebener, N, Weixler, S et al. (2006) Characterization of GD2 peptide mimotope DNA vaccines effective against spontaneous neuroblastoma metastases. Cancer Res. 66: 10567–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lode, HN, Reisfeld, RA (2000) Targeted cytokines for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Res. 21: 279–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, CA, Gillies, SA (2003) Immunocytokines: amplification of anti-cancer immunity. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 52: 297–308.Google ScholarPubMed
Niethammer, AG, Xiang, R, Ruehlmann, JM et al. (2001) Targeted interleukin 2 therapy enhances protective immunity induced by an autologous oral DNA vaccine against murine melanoma. Cancer Res. 61: 6178–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Osenga, KL, Hank, JA, Albertini, MR et al. (2006) A phase I clinical trial of the hu14.18-IL2 (EMD 273063) as a treatment for children with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma and melanoma: a study of the Children's Oncology Group. Clin Cancer Res. 12: 1750–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushner, BH, Cheung, NK (2005) Neuroblastoma – from genetic profiles to clinical challenge. N Engl J Med. 353: 2215–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×