Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:16:49.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Representation

from ENTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Alison Simmons
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Lawrence Nolan
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access

Summary

Representation (Latin repraesentatio, French représentation) is not a technical term for Descartes. He offers no definition of it and has no explicit theory of it. While representation is a central concept in today's theory of mind (along with intentionality and consciousness), early modern theories of mind center on the cognitive faculties (intellect, imagination, memory, senses). That does not mean the concept of representation plays no role in Descartes’ theory of mind; it simply means that we have to do some rational reconstruction to determine what that role is.

1.Preliminaries

In the seventeenth century, repraesentare and représenter mean many things, but their chief meaning is to present something or make something immediately available. One can represent a gift to a friend or a sum of money to a creditor. But the verbs can also mean making something present by way of a proxy or substitute for the thing itself. In this latter sense, a lawyer represents his client. Most cases of philosophical interest fall somewhere in between the two: when an actor represents Henry VIII on the stage, there is a sense in which he is making Henry VIII present to the audience, although he is just a proxy or substitute for Henry himself. The ambiguity found in this case animates discussions of representation in the theory of mind: mental states make objects, facts, and states of affairs present to the mind, but do they do so by means of proxies or substitutes for those objects, facts, and states of affairs? If they do employ proxies, what are the epistemological and metaphysical consequences? And whether or not they employ proxies, how does a mental state manage to represent something distinct from itself? These are questions an account of mental representation must answer.

2.Epistemology of Mental Representation

The question whether Descartes was a “direct realist” or an “indirect realist” has occupied commentators since Reid in the eighteenth century cast him in the latter role. At issue is whether thought (including both sensory and intellectual perception) involves mental representations that mediate epistemologically between mind and world. Direct realists insist that the mind is in immediate epistemic contact with its object.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alanen, Lili. 2003. Descartes's Concept of Mind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arbini, Ronald. 1983. “Did Descartes Have a Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 21: 317–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broughton, Janet. 2008. “Self-Knowledge,” in A Companion to Descartes, ed. Broughton, J. and Carriero, J.. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Deborah. 2006. Descartes and the Passionate Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John. 2009. Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’ Meditations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere. 1986. “The Theory of Ideas,” in Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Rorty, A. O.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 177–98.Google Scholar
Cook, Monte. 1987. “Descartes’ Alleged RepresentationalismHistory of Philosophy Quarterly 4: 179–95.Google Scholar
De Rosa, Raffaella. 2010. Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Sean. 2007. “Descartes on the Passions: Function, Representation and Motivation,” Noûs 41: 714–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. 2007. “Did Descartes Have a Jamesian Theory of the Emotions?,” Philosophical Psychology 20: 413–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. 2003. Descartes and the Meditations.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Paul. 2002. “Direct Realism, Intentionality, and the Objective Being of Ideas,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83: 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Paul. 1991. “Three Dualist Theories of the Passions,” Philosophical Topics 19: 153–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. 1997. Action and Passion.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas. 1990. The Light of the Soul. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Laura. 1999. “Mechanism and the Representational Nature of Sensation in Descartes,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29: 411–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1968. Descartes: A Study of his Philosophy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Laporte, Jean. 1945. Le rationalisme de Descartes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 1980. “Descartes’ Empirical Epistemology,” in Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. Gaukroger, S.. Sussex: Harvester, 6–22.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. 1974. “The Inherence Pattern and Descartes’ Ideas,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Ann Wilbur. 1990. “Descartes on Sensory Representation,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. 16: 109–147.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 1989. Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan. 1996. “The Falsity in Sensory Ideas: Descartes and Arnauld,” in Interpreting Arnauld, ed. Kremer, E. J.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 223–41.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin. 1986. “Meaning and Objective Being in Descartes and His Sources,” in Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, ed. A. O. Rorty., Berkeley: University of California Press, 223–41.Google Scholar
O'Neil, Brian E. 1974. Epistemological Direct Realism in Descartes.Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Pessin, Andrew. 2009. “Mental Transparency, Direct Sensation, and the Unity of the Cartesian Mind,” in Topics in Early Modern Philosophy of Mind, ed. Miller, J.. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–37.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie. 1986. “Cartesian Passions and the Union of Mind and Body,” in Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Rorty, A. O.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 513–34.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen. 1998. Descartes's Dualism.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. 1992. “Sensation, Occasionalism and Descartes’ Causal Principles,” in Minds, Ideas and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy, ed. Cummins, P. D. and Zoeller, G.. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 37–55.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Amy. 1994. “Representation, Self-Representation, and the Passions in Descartes,” Review of Metaphysics 48: 331–58.Google Scholar
Secada, Jorge. 2000. Cartesian Metaphysics: The Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Lisa. 2012. “How We Experience the World: Passionate Perception in Descartes and Spinoza,” in Emotion and Reason in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Picave, M. and Shapiro, L.. New York: Oxford University Press, 193–216.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. 2003. “The Cognitive Structure of Sensory Experience,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 549–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Alison. 1999. “Are Cartesian Sensations Representational?,” Noûs 33: 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret. 1999. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton, John. 1984. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Representation
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.221
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Representation
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.221
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Representation
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.221
Available formats
×