Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:18:53.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

References

Michael Maschler
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Eilon Solan
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Shmuel Zamir
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Game Theory , pp. 958 - 967
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. A. (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alon, N., Brightwell, G., Kierstead, H. A., Kostochka, A. V., and Winkler, P. (2006) Dominating sets in k-majority tournaments. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 96, 374–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E. and Solan, E. (2009) Constrained games: the impact of the attitude to adversary's constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54, 2435–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, F. and Aumann, R. J. (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armbruster, W. and Böge, W. (1979) Bayesian game theory. In Moeschlin, O. and Pallaschke, D. (eds.), Game Theory and Related Topics. North-Holland, 17–28.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Helsinki: Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1974) Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1976) Agree to disagree. Annals of Statistics, 4, 1236–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1987) Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality. Econometrica, 55, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1999) Interactive epistemology II: probability. International Journal of Game Theory, 28, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. and Hart, S. (1986) Bi-convexity and bi-martingales. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 54, 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. and Dréze, J.-H. (1975) Cooperative games with coalition structures. International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 217–37.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. and Maschler, M. (1964) The bargaining set for cooperative games. In Drescher, M., Shapley, L. S., and Tucker, A. W. (eds.), Advances in Game Theory, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 52. Princeton University Press, 443–76.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. and Maschler, M. (1985) Game-theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. Journal of Economic Theory, 36, 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. and Maschler, M. (1995) Repeated Games with Incomplete Information. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. and Shapley, L. S. (1974) Values of Non-Atomic Games. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. and Shapley, L. S. (1994) Long-term competition: a game-theoretic analysis. In Megiddo, N. (ed.), Essays in Game Theory in Honor of Michael Maschler. Springer, 1–15.Google Scholar
Avenhaus, R., von Stengel, B., and Zamir, S. (2002) Inspection games. In Aumann, R. J. and Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economics Applications, Vol. 3. North-Holland, 1947–87.Google Scholar
Balinski, M. and Laraki, R. (2007) A theory of measuring, electing and ranking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 8720–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banks, J. S. and Sobel, J. (1987) Equilibrium selection in signaling games. Econometrica, 55, 647–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, J.-P. and Krishna, V. (1985) Finitely repeated games. Econometrica, 53, 905–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1999) Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biran, D. and Tauman, Y. (2007) The role of intelligence in a strategic conflict. Preprint.
Bird, C. G. (1976) On cost allocation for a spanning tree: a game-theoretic approach. Network, 6, 335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, D. (1956) An analog of the Minimax Theorem for vector payoffs. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 6, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, D. and Ferguson, T. S. (1968) The big match. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 39, 159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohnenblust, H. F. and Karlin, S. (1950) On a theorem of Ville. In Contributions to the Theory of Games, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 24. Princeton University Press, 155–60.Google Scholar
Bollobás, B. (1953) Littlewood's Miscellany. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bondareva, O. (1963) Some applications of linear programming methods to the theory of cooperative games. Problemy Kibernetiki, 10, 119–39 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Borda, J. C. (1784) Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, Paris, 657–65.Google Scholar
Border, K. C. (1989) Fixed Point Theorems with Applications to Economics and Game Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bouton, C. L. (1901) Nim, a game with a complete mathematical theory. Annals of Mathematics, 2, 33–9.Google Scholar
Braess, D. (1968) Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung, 12, 258–68.Google Scholar
Translation from the original German by D., Braess, A., Nagurney and T., Wakolbinger (2005) On a paradox of traffic planning. Transportation Science, 39, 446–50.
Camerer, C. and Weigelt, K. (1988) Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica, 56, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesa-Bianchi, N. and Lugosi, G. (2006) Prediction, Learning and Games. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, I. K. and Kreps, D. M. (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 179–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, A. and Kleitman, D. J. (1973) Cost allocation for a spanning tree. Network, 3, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de (1785) Essai sur L'Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendus à la Pluralité des Voix. Paris: l'Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Conway, J. B. (1990) A Course in Functional Analysis. Springer.Google Scholar
Curiel, I., Pederzoli, G., and Tijs, S. (1989) Sequencing games. European Journal of Operations Research, 40, 344–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dantzig, G. B. (1963) Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. and Maschler, M. (1965) The kernel of cooperative games. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 12, 223–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. and Maschler, M. (1967) Existence of stable payoff configurations. In Shubik, M. (ed.), Essays in Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern. Princeton University Press, 39–52.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Derks, J. J. M. (1992) A short proof of the inclusion of the core in the Weber set. International Journal of Game Theory, 21, 149–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekmann, A. (1985) Volunteer's Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 605–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, P. (1975) On the uniqueness of the Shapley value. International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubins, L. E. and Freedman, D. A. (1981) Machiavelli and the Gale–Shapley algorithm. American Mathematical Monthly, 88, 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T. (1988) Linear Operators Part I: General Theory. Wiley.Google Scholar
Felsenthal, D. S. and Machover, M. (1998) The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fibich, G., Gavious, A., and Sela, A. (2004) Revenue equivalence in asymmetric auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 115, 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filar, J. A. and Vrieze, K. (1997) Competitive Markov Decision Processes. Springer.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1891) Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University.
Ford, L. K. and Fulkerson, D. R. (1962) Flows in Networks. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Forges, F. (1982) Infinitely repeated games of incomplete information: symmetric case with random signals. International Journal of Game Theory, 11, 203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D. P. and Vohra, R. V. (1997) Calibrated learning and correlated equilibrium. Games and Economics Behavior, 21, 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. (1999) Conditional universal consistency. Games and Economic Behavior, 29, 104–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, D. and Maskin, E. (1986) The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica, 54, 533–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaifman, H. (1986) A theory of higher order probabilities. In Halpern, J. Y. (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge: Proceedings of the 1986 Conference. Kaufmann, 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, D. (1974) A curious Nim-type game. American Mathematical Monthly, 81, 876–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, D. (1979) The game of Hex and the Brouwer fixed point theorem. American Mathematical Monthly, 86, 818–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, D. and Shapley, L. S. (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly, 69, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, D. and Sotomayor, M. (1985) Some remarks on the stable matching problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 11, 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, J. (1992) Common knowledge. In Aumann, R. J. and Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economics Applications, Vol. 2. North-Holland, 1437–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, J. (2005) Three brief proofs of Arrow's impossibility theorem. Economic Theory, 26, 211–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, J. and Polemarchakis, H. M. (1982) We can't disagree forever. Journal of Economic Theory, 28, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, J. and Sebenius, J. (1983) Don't bet on it: contingent agreements with asymmetric information. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 424–6.Google Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1973) Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica, 41, 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, D. (1957) Stochastic games with zero stop probabilities. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Annals of Studies, 39. Princeton University Press, 179–88.Google Scholar
Gillies, D. B. (1953) Some theorems on n-person games. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University.
Gillies, D. B. (1959) Solutions to general non-zero-sum games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Annals of Studies, 40. Princeton University Press, 47–85.Google Scholar
Gilboa, I. and Zemel, E. (1989) Nash and correlated equilibria: some complexity considerations. Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, J. and Ma, A. (1989) Efficient allocation of a prize – King Solomon's dilemma. Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 222–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glicksberg, I. L. (1952) A further generalization of the Kakutani fixed point theorem, with application to Nash equilibrium points. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 3, 170–4.Google Scholar
Gossner, O. (1995) The folk theorem for finitely repeated games with mixed strategies. International Journal of Game Theory, 24, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossner, O. and Tomala, T. (2007) Secret correlation in repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Mathematics of Operations Research, 32, 413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granot, D. and Huberman, G. (1981) Minimum cost spanning tree games. Mathematical Programming, 21, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusfield, D. and Irving, R. W. (1989) The Stable Marriage Problem, Structure and Algorithm. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. Y. (1986) Reasoning about knowledge: an overview. In Halpern, J. Y. (ed.), Reasoning about Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann, 1–18.Google Scholar
Hannan, J. (1957) Approximation to Bayes risk in repeated plays. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Annals of Studies, 39. Princeton University Press, 97–139.Google Scholar
Harris, C., Reny, P., and Robson, A. (1995) The existence of subgame-perfect equilibrium in continuous games with almost perfect information: a case of public randomization. Econometrica, 63, 507–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1967) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. I. The basic model. Management Science, 14, 159–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1968a) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. II. Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Science, 14, 320–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1968b) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. III. The basic probability distribution of the game. Management Science, 14, 486–502.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1973) Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: a new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points. International Journal of Game Theory, 2, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. (1985) Nonzero-sum two-person repeated games with incomplete information. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10, 117–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. (1989) Potential, value and consistency. Econometrica, 57, 589–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. (2000) A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium. Econometrica, 68, 1127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heifetz, A. and Samet, D. (1998) Topology-free topology of beliefs. Journal of Economic Theory, 82, 324–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, J. H. (1950) Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2, 157–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelberg, C. J. (1975) Measurable relations. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 87, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofbauer, J. and Sigmund, K. (2003) Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, C. (1980) Competitive bidding for contracts under alternative auction procedure. Journal of Political Economics, 88, 433–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1929) Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, T. F. (1971) Approachability in a two-person game. Annals of Mathematical Studies, 42, 735–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G. (1980) The nucleolus and essential coalitions. In Bensoussan, A. and Lions, J. (eds.), Analysis and Optimization of Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science, 28. Springer, 416–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isbell, J. R. (1959) On the enumeration of majority games. Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation, 13, 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, R. (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30, 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, J. P. and Rapoport, A. (1984) Theories of Coalition Formation. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kakutani, S. (1941) A generalization of Brouwer's fixed point theorem. Duke Mathematical Journal, 8, 457–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalai, E. and Smorodinsky, M. (1975) Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. Econometrica, 43, 513–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalai, E. and Zemel, E. (1982a) Generalized network problems yielding totally balanced games. Operations Research, 30, 998–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalai, E. and Zemel, E. (1982b) Totally balanced games and games of flow. Mathematics of Operations Research, 7, 476–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameda, H. and Hosokawa, Y. (2000) A paradox in distributed optimization of performance. Discussion Paper ISE-TR-00-164, Institute of Information Sciences and Electronics, University of Tsukuba.
Kaminski, M. M. (2000) Hydraulic rationing. Mathematical Social Sciences, 40, 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, T. R. and Zamir, S. (2011) Multiple equilibria in asymmetric first-price auctions. Working Paper.
Kaplan, T. R. and Zamir, S. (2012) Asymmetric first-price auctions with uniform distributions: analytic solutions to the general case. Economic Theory, 50, 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihlstrom, R. E., Roth, A. E., and Schmeidler, D. (1981) Risk aversion and solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. In Moeschlin, O. and Pallaschke, D. (eds.), Game Theory and Mathematical Economics. North-Holland, 65–71.Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. (2004) Auctions: Theory and Practice (The Toulouse Lectures in Economics). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knasker, B., Kuratowski, K., and Mazurkiewicz, S. (1929) Ein Beweis des Fixpunktsatzes für n-dimensionale Simplexe. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 14, 132–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, E. and Mertens, J. F. (1986) On the strategic stability of equilibria. Econometrica, 54, 1003–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, E. and Zamir, S. (1974) Repeated games of incomplete information: the symmetric case. Annals of Statistics, 2, 1040–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopelowitz, A. (1967) Computation of the kernels of simple games and the nucleolus of N-person games. Research Memorandum.
Korevaar, J. (2004) Tauberian Theory: A Century of Developments. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M. and Ramey, G. (1987) Structural consistency, consistency, and sequential rationality. Econometrica, 55, 1331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M. and Wilson, R. B. (1982) Sequential equilibria. Econometrica, 50, 863–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1963) Semantical analysis of model logic. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 9, 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, V. (2002) Auction Theory. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, H. W. (1957) Extensive games and the problem of information. In Kuhn, H. and Tucker, A. W., Contribution to the Theory of Games, Annals of Studies, 28. Princeton University Press, 193–216.Google Scholar
Kuhn, H. W. (1960) Some combinatorial lemmas in topology. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 4, 518–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, H. W. (1968) Simplicial approximation of fixed points. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 61, 1238–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuratowski, K. (1922) Une méthode délimination des nombres transfinis des raisonnements mathématiques. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 3, 76–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebesgue, H. (1905) Sur les fonctions représentables analytiquement. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 1, 139–216.Google Scholar
Lebrun, B. (1999) First price auctions in the asymmetric N bidder case. International Economic Review, 40, 125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. (1989) Lower equilibrium payoffs in two-player repeated games with nonobservable actions. International Journal of Game Theory, 18, 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. (1990) Nash equilibria of n-player repeated games with semi-standard information. International Journal of Game Theory, 19, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. (1992a) Correlated equilibria in two-player repeated games with nonobservable actions. Mathematics of Operations Research, 17, 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. (1992b) On the equilibrium payoffs set of two player repeated games with imperfect monitoring. International Journal of Game Theory, 20, 211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. (2002) Approachability in infinitely dimensional spaces. International Journal of Game Theory, 31, 255–70.Google Scholar
Lehrer, E. and Solan, E. (2006) Excludability and bounded computational capacity strategies. Mathematics of Operations Research, 31, 637–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. and Solan, E. (2007) A general internal regret-free strategy. Preprint.
Lehrer, E. and Solan, E. (2008) Approachability with bounded memory. Games and Economic Behavior, 66, 995–1004.Google Scholar
Lehrer, E., Solan, E., and Viossat, Y. (2010) Equilibrium payoffs in finite games. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 47, 48–53.Google Scholar
Lensberg, T. (1988) Stability and the Nash solution. Journal of Economic Theory, 45, 330–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1969) Convention. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Liggett, T. M. and Lippman, S. A. (1969) Stochastic games with perfect information and time average payoff. SIAM Review, 11, 604–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlechild, S. C. (1974) A simple expression for the nucleolus in a special case. International Journal of Game Theory, 3, 21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. (1957) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. Wiley.Google Scholar
Lugosi, G., Mannor, S., and Stoltz, G. (2007) Strategies for prediction under imperfect monitoring. COLT2007, San Diego, California. In Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, 4539, 248–62.Google Scholar
Mailath, G. J. and Samuelson, L. (2006) Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschak, J. (1950) Rational behavior, uncertainty prospects, and measurable utility. Econometrica, 18, 111–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, M. (1966a) The inequalities that determine the bargaining set M(i)1. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 4, 127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, M. (1966b) A price leadership method for solving the inspector's non-constant sum game. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 13, 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, M. (1967) The inspector's non-constant-sum game: its dependence on a system of detectors. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 14, 275–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, M. (1978) Playing an n-person game: an experiment. In Sauermann, H. (ed.), Beitäge zur Experimentellen Virtschaftsforschung, Vol. VIII, Coalition-Forming Behavior. JCB Mohr, 231–328.Google Scholar
Maschler, M. and Peleg, B. (1966) A characterization, existence proof and dimension bounds for the kernel of a game. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 18, 289–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, M., Peleg, B., and Shapley, L. S. (1979) Geometric properties of the kernel, nucleolus and related solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4, 303–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskin, E. and Riley, J. (2000) Asymmetric auctions. Review of Economic Studies, 67, 413–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. and Price, G. R. (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature (London), 2461, 13–18.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, R. D. and Page, T. (1986) Common knowledge, consensus, and aggregate information. Econometrica, 54, 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megiddo, N. (1980) On repeated games with incomplete information played by non-Bayesian players. International Journal of Game Theory, 9, 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, J. F. and Zamir, S. (1985) Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory, 14, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. R. (2004) Putting Auction Theory to Work (Churchill Lectures in Economics). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. R. and Roberts, J. (1990) Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica, 58, 1255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. R. and Weber, R. J. (1982) A theory of auctions and competitve bidding. Econometrica, 50, 1089–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. R. and Weber, R. J. (1985) Distributional strategies for games with incomplete information. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10, 619–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, J. W. (1952) Reasonable outcomes for n-person games. Research Memorandum 916, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
Monderer, D. and Samet, D. (1989) Approximating common knowledge with common beliefs. Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 170–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mycielski, J. (1992) Games with perfect information. In Aumann, R. J. and Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 1. North-Holland, 41–70.Google Scholar
Myerson, R. B. (1979) Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, 47, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R. B. (1981) Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, R. (1995) Unraveling in guessing games: an experimental study. American Economic Review, 85, 1313–26.Google Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1950a) The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1950b) Equilibrium points in N-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 36, 48–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, J. F. (1951) Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1953) Two person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21, 128–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, A. (1985) Bounded complexity justifies cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma. Economic Letters, 19, 227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, A. (1989) Uniqueness of the Shapley value. Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 116–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, A. and Sorin, S. (1997) Equilibria in Repeated Games with Incomplete Information: The Deterministic Symmetric Case. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 129–31.Google Scholar
Neyman, A. and Sorin, S. (1998) Equilibria in repeated games with incomplete information: the general symmetric case. International Journal of Game Theory, 27, 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, A. and Sorin, S. (2003) Stochastic Games and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, B. (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2, 345–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orshan, G. (1993) The prenucleolus and the reduced game property: equal treatment replaces anonymity. International Journal of Game Theory, 22, 241–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parikh, R. and Krasucki, P. (1990) Communication, consensus and knowldge. Journal of Economic Theory, 52, 178–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peleg, B. (1965) An inductive method for constructing minimal balanced collections of finite sets. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 12, 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peleg, B. (1967) Existence theorem for the bargaining set M1(i). In Shubik, M. (ed.), Essays in Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern. Princeton University Press, 53–6.Google Scholar
Peleg, B. (1968) On weights of constant-sum majority games. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 16, 527–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peleg, B. (1969) Equilibrium points for games with infinitely many players. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 1, 292–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peleg, B. (1984) Game Theoretic Analysis of Voting in Committees. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peleg, B. and Sudhölter, P. (2003) Introduction to the Theory of Games. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Perles, M. A. and Maschler, M. (1981) The super-additive solution for the nash bargaining game. International Journal of Game Theory, 10, 163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccione, M. and Rubinstein, A. (1997) On the interpretation of decision problems with imperfect recall. Games and Economic Behavior, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. W. (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reny, P. J. and Zamir, S. (2004) On the existence of pure strategy monotone equilibria in asymmetric first-price auctions. Econometrica, 72, 1105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. W. (1981) Games of perfect information, predatory games and the chain-store paradox. Journal of Economic Theory, 25, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E. (2005) Matching and allocation in medicine and health care. In Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, 237–9.Google Scholar
Roth, A. E. and Sotomayor, M. A. O. (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis, Econometric Society Monographs, 18. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (1979) Equilibrium in supergames with the overtaking criterion. Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (1989) The electronic mail game: a game with almost common knowledge. American Economic Review, 79, 385–91.Google Scholar
Rudin, W. (1966) Real and Complex Analysis. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rustichini, A. (1999) Minimizing regret: the general case. Games and Economic Behavior, 29, 224–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975) Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Schauder, J. (1930) Der Fixpunktsatz in Funktionalräaumen. Studia Mathematica, 2, 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeidler, D. (1969) The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17, 1163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeidler, D. (1972) Cores of exact games. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 40, 214–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebenius, J. K. and Geanakoplos, J. (1983) Don't bet on it: contingent agreements with asymmetric information. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 424–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R. (1965) Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatwissenschaft, 121, 301–24 and 667–89.Google Scholar
Selten, R. (1973) A simple model of imperfect competition, where four are few and six are many. International Journal of Game Theory, 2, 141–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R. (1975) Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R. (1978) The chainstore paradox. Theory and Decision, 9, 127–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R. and Schuster, K. (1968) Psychological Variables and Coalition Forming Behavior. Proceedings of the Conference of the IEA (Smolenile), London, 221–46.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. S. (1953) A value for n person games. In Kuhn, H. W. and Tucker, A. W. (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 28, 307–19.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. S. (1969) Utility comparison and the theory of games. In La Decision Aggregation Ordres de Preference. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 251–63.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. S. (1971) Cores of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory, 1, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, L. S. (1994) Notes for the Course Mathematics 147: Game Theory. Department of Mathematics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1963) The core of an economy with nonconvex preferences. RM-3518, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1966) Quasi-cores in a monetary economy with nonconvex preferences. Econometrica, 34, 805–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1969) On market games. Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiryaev, A. N. (1995) Probability, 2nd edn. Springer.Google Scholar
Simon, R. S. (2003) Games of incomplete information, ergodic theory, and the measurability of equilibria. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 138, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, R. S., Spież, S., and Toruńczyk, H. (1995) The existence of equilibria in certain games, separation for families of convex functions and a theorem of Borsuk–Ulam type. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 92, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, C. (1995) Axiomatization of the nucleolus. Mathematics of Operations Research, 20, 189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolev, A. I. (1975) The characterization of optimality principles in cooperative games by functional operations. In Vorobiev, N. N. (ed.), Mathematical Methods in Social Sciences, 6. Vilnius Academy of Sciences of the Lithuanian SSR, 95–151 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Solymosi, T. (1999) On the bargaining set, kernel and core of superadditive games. International Journal of Game Theory, 28, 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorin, S. (1983) Some results on the existence of Nash equilibria for non-zero-sum games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory, 12, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorin, S. (1992) Repeated games with complete information. In Aumann, R. J. and Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 1. North-Holland, 71–108.Google Scholar
Sorin, S. (2002) A First Course on Zero-Sum Repeated Games. Mathématiques et Applications, 37. Springer.Google Scholar
Sorin, S. and Zamir, S. (1985) A two-person game with lack of information on 1½ sides. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, A. M. (1974) Market Signaling. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spinat, X. (2002) A necessary and sufficient condition for approachability. Mathematics of Operations Research, 27, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, R. E. (1968) Convergent trasfer schemes for N-person games. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 134, 449–59.Google Scholar
Sudhölter, P. (1996) The modified nucleolus as canonical representation of weighted majority Games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 21, 734–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suslin, M. (1917) Sur une définition des ensembles measurables B sans nombres transfinis. C.R. Academie Science ParisSéries A, 164, 88–91.Google Scholar
Tamir, A. (1991) On the core of network synthesis games. Mathematical Programming, 50, 123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. B. (1952) Equivalence of games in extensive form. RM-759, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Reprinted in Kuhn, H. (ed.), Classics in Game Theory, 1997. Princeton University Press, 36–45.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Damme, E. (1987) Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zandt, T. (2007) Interim Bayesian Nash equilibrium on universal type spaces for supermodular games. Journal of Economic Theory, 145, 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zandt, T. and Vives, X. (2007) Monotone equilibria in Bayesian games of strategic complementarities. Journal of Economic Theory, 134, 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderbei, R. J. (2001) Linear Programming: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd edn. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 37. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilakis, S. and Zamir, S. (1993) Common belief and common knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 22, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, W. (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.Google Scholar
Vickery, W. (1962) Auctions and bidding games. In Morgenstern, O. and Tucker, A. W. (eds.), Recent Advances in Game Theory, Princeton Conference Series, 29. Princeton University Press, 15–27.Google Scholar
Vieille, N. (1992) Weak approachability. Mathematics of Operations Research, 17, 781–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, X. (1990) Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 19, 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1928) Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele. Mathematische Annalen, 100, 295–320.Google Scholar
English translation in Tucker, A. W. and Luce, R. D. (eds.), Contribution to the Theory of Games, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 40, 1959, 295–320.
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
von Stengel, B. and Forges, F. (2008) Extensive form correlated equilibrium: definition and computation complexity. Mathematics of Operations Research, 33, 1002–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. J. (1988) Probabilistic values for games. In Roth, A. (ed.), The Shapley Value: Essays in Honor of Lloyd Shapley. Cambridge University Press, 101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfstetter, E. (1996) Auctions: an introduction. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10, 367–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, H. P. (1985) Cost allocation in fair allocation. In Young, H. P. (ed.), Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 33. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 69–94.Google Scholar
Zamir, S. (1992) Repeated games of incomplete informatation: zero-sum. In Aumann, R. J. and Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 1. North-Holland, 109–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeman, E. C. (1980) Population dynamics from game theory. In Global Theory of Dynamical Systems, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 819. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, M. (1935) A remark on methods in transfinite algebra. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 41, 667–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Michael Maschler, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Eilon Solan, Tel-Aviv University, Shmuel Zamir, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Book: Game Theory
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794216.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Michael Maschler, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Eilon Solan, Tel-Aviv University, Shmuel Zamir, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Book: Game Theory
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794216.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Michael Maschler, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Eilon Solan, Tel-Aviv University, Shmuel Zamir, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Book: Game Theory
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794216.025
Available formats
×