Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:45:53.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Anne Margaret Baxley
Anne Margaret Baxley
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Theory of Virtue
The Value of Autocracy
 , pp. 180 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin, 2nd edition, Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1999.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian, Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Ciceros Buchern von den Pflichten, Breslau: Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn, 1783.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V., New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? trans. Mary J. Gregor, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), ed. and trans. Louden, Robert B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgment, trans. Pluhar, Werner S., Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary J. Gregor, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Mary J. Gregor (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Gesammelte Schriften, ed. the Royal Prussian (later German, then Berlin-Brandenburg) Academy of Sciences, 29 vols., Berlin: Georg Reimer (later Walter de Gruyter & Co.), 1900–.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary J. Gregor, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Kant on the metaphysics of morals: Vigilantius's lecture notes, trans. Peter Heath, in Lectures on Ethics, ed. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary J. Gregor, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Moral Philosophy: Collins's lecture notes, trans. Peter Heath, in Lectures on Ethics, ed. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Morality according to Prof. Kant: Mrongovius's second set of lecture notes (selections), trans. Peter Heath, in Lectures on Ethics, ed. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, On the Common Saying: That May be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice, trans. Mary J. Gregor, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and Giovanni, George Di, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Toward Perpetual Peace, trans. Mary J. Gregor, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, The Complete Works of Friedrich Schiller, Volume VIII: Aesthetical and Philosophical Essays, trans. anonymous, New York: P. F. Collier & Son, 1902.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man, ed. and trans. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L. A., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Schiller's “On Grace and Dignity” in Its Cultural Context: Essays and a New Translation (Studies in German Literature, Linguistics, and Culture), ed. Curran, Jane V. and Fricker, Christophe, Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2005.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Über Anmut und Würde, in Schiller's Werke, Volume IV: Schriften, introd. Meyer, Hans and Mann, Golo, Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1966.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, and Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Xenien: “The Philosophers,” in Goethe's Werke, Volume I, ed. Trunz, Erich, Munich: Beck, 1982.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, On the Basis of Morality, trans. E. F. J. Payne, Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1995.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry, Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry, Kant's Theory of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia, The Morality of Happiness, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia, “Virtue Ethics,” in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, ed. Copp, David, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 515–36.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia, “Acting from Duty (GMS I, 397–401),” in Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Horn, Christoph and Schönecker, Dieter, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006, pp. 72–92.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia, Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia, “Love and Respect in the Doctrine of Virtue,” in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 391–407.Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, “Autocracy and Autonomy,” Kant-Studien 94, 1 (2003): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, “The Beautiful Soul and the Autocratic Agent: Schiller's and Kant's ‘Children of the House,’” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, “Does Kantian Virtue Amount to More than Continence?” The Review of Metaphysics 56 (2003): 559–86.Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, “Kantian Virtue,” Philosophy Compass 2, 3 (2007): 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, “Pleasure, Freedom, and Grace: Schiller's ‘Completion’ of Kant's Ethics,” Inquiry, 51 (2008): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret, “The Price of Virtue,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2007): 403–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, “Sir David Ross on Duty and Purpose in Kant,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16, 1 (1955): 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick, Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Lawrence, Friendship, Altruism, and Morality, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
Brelage, Manfred, Studien zur Transzendentalphilosophie, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot, “The Character of Temptation: Towards a More Plausible Kantian Moral Psychology,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002): 103–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, David, “Kantian Rationalism: Inescapability, Authority, and Supremacy,” in Ethics and Practical Reason, ed. Cullity, Garret and Gaut, Berys, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 255–91.Google Scholar
Brink, David, “Moral Motivation,” Ethics 108 (1997): 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, David, Review of Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J. (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Philosophical Review 108 (1999): 576–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, David, Review of Nancy Sherman, Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue, Philosophical Review 109 (2000): 428–34.Google Scholar
Cagle, Randy, “Becoming a Virtuous Agent: Kant and the Cultivation of Feelings and Emotions,” Kant-Studien 96 (2005): 452–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnois, Bernard, The Coherence of Kant's Doctrine of Freedom, trans. David Booth, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, Katerina, “Grace as a Guide to Morals? Schiller's Aesthetic Turn in Ethics,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 23, 1(2006): 1–20.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara, “Kant and Hume on Morality,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (Summer 2009 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/kant-hume-morality/.
Denis, Lara, “Kant's Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy,” Kantian Review 4 (2000): 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara, “Kant's Conception of Virtue,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. Guyer, Paul, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 505–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, Daniel, “Socrates' Kantian Conception of Virtue,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1995): 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen, “The Inner Freedom of Virtue,” in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 289–316.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen, and Whiting, Jennifer (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Fackenheim, Emil, “Kant and Radical Evil,” University of Toronto Quarterly 23 (1954): 339–53.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa, Virtue and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles, An Anatomy of Values: Problems of Personal and Social Choice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, Jeffrey, “Schiller's Critique of Kant's Moral Psychology: Reconciling Practical Reason and an Ethics of Virtue,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (1997): 513–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond, “Kultur, Bildung, Geist,” History and Theory 35, 2 (1996): 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregor, Mary J., Laws of Freedom, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine, Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Story of Dependence, Corruption, and Virtue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant's System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter, “Das Prinzip der kantischen Ethik,” Philosophische Rundschau 2 (1954–5): 29–34.
Henson, Richard, “What Kant Might Have Said: Moral Worth and the Overdetermination of Action,” Philosophical Review 88, 1 (1979): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara, “Making Room for Character,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, ed. Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara, The Practice of Moral Judgment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E., Editor's Introduction to Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (Oxford Philosophical Texts), ed. Hill, Thomas E., trans. Arnulf Zweig, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hinman, Lawrence, “On the Purity of Our Moral Motives: A Critique of Kant's Account of the Emotions and Acting for the Sake of Duty,” The Monist 66 (1983): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Jason, “Kant and Moral Imputation: Conscience and the Riddle of the Given,” American Philosophical Quarterly 78, 4 (2004): 609–27.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind, On Virtue Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence, “Kant's Criticisms of Eudaimonism,” in Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, ed. Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 63–101.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert, “Kant's Moral Philosophy,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (Winter 2009 edition), forthcoming, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/kant-moral/.Google Scholar
König, Peter, Autonomie und Autokratie: Über Kant's Metaphysik Der Sitten, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine, Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine, “From Duty and For the Sake of the Noble: Kant and Aristotle on Morally Good Action,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, ed. Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 203–36.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine, Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred, Kant: A Biography, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred, “Kant and Cicero,” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Gerhardt, Volker, Rolf-Peter Horstmann, , and Schumacher, Ralph, Volume III, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001, pp. 270–8.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B., Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B., “Kant's Virtue Ethics,” Philosophy 61 (1986): 473–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAleer, Sean, “Kant and Aristotle on the Difficulty of Moral Knowledge: Lessons from the Doctrine of Virtue,” Studies in the History of Ethics (2005), http://www.historyofethics.org/062005/062005McAleer.shtml.Google Scholar
McDowell, John, “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplemental Volume 52 (1978): 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John, “The Role of Eudaimonia in Aristotle's Ethics,” in Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, ed. Amélie Oskenberg Rorty, , Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1980, pp. 359–76.Google Scholar
McDowell, John, “Virtue and Reason,” The Monist 62 (1979): 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. D., Schiller and the Ideal of Freedom: A Study of Schiller's Philosophical Works with Chapters on Kant, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Munchnik, Pablo, Kant's Theory of Evil: An Essay on the Dangers of Self-Love and the Aprioricity of History, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas, Kant's Conception of Moral Character: The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Justin, Morality and the Emotions, London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
O'Connor, John D., “Are Virtue Ethics and Kantian Ethics Really So Very Different?” New Blackfriars 87 (2006): 238–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora, “Kant's Virtues,” in How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues, ed. Crisp, Roger, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 77–97.Google Scholar
Packer, Mark, “Kant on Desire and Moral Pleasure,” Journal of the History of Ideas 50, 3 (1989): 429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paton, H. J., The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy, London: Hutchinson & Company Ltd., 1947.Google Scholar
Potter, Nelson, “Kant and the Moral Worth of Actions,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (1996): 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold, Kant über Freiheit als Autonomie, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus, “Kant and Greek Ethics,” trans. W. H. Walsh, Mind 48, 191 and 192 (1939): 338–54 and 446–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, James, “Morality and Sensibility in Kant: Toward a Theory of Virtue,” Kantian Review 8 (2004): 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiner, Hans, Duty and Inclination, trans. Mark Santos, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983.Google Scholar
Roehr, Sabine, “Freedom and Autonomy in Schiller,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2003): 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaper, Eva, Studies in Kant's Aesthetics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Schaper, Eva, “Towards the Aesthetic: A Journey with Friedrich Schiller,” British Journal of Aesthetics 25, 2 (1985): 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, Human Morality, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B., “The Misfortunes of Virtue,” Ethics 101 (1990): 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy, Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Kelly, “Kant's Taxonomy of the Emotions,” Kantian Review 6 (2002): 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, Michael, “Friendship and Duty: Some Difficult Relations,” in Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology, ed. Flanagan, Owen J. and Amélie Oskenberg Rorty, , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990, pp. 219–33.Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael, “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories,” Journal of Philosophy 73 (1976): 453–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, Michael, “Values and Purposes: The Limits of Teleology and the Ends of Friendship,” Journal of Philosophy 78 (1981): 747–65.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Julie, “Acting With Feeling From Duty,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2002): 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, Zvi, “Aesthetic Education for Morality,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 40, 3 (2006): 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Richard, Good and Evil, revised edition, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Timmerman, Jens, “Kant on Conscience, ‘Indirect’ Duty, and Moral Error,” International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2006): 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmerman, Jens, Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildt, Andreas, Autonomie und Anerkennung: Hegels Moralitätskritik im Lichte seiner Fichte-Rezeption, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1982.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Moral Luck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Susan, “The Failure of Autonomy,” Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, 1978.
Wood, Allen, “The Good Without Limitation,” in Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Horn, Christoph and Schönecker, Dieter, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen, Hegel's Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen, Kantian Ethics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen, Kant's Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen, “The Supreme Principle of Morality,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. Guyer, Paul, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 342–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select bibliography
  • Anne Margaret Baxley, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Kant's Theory of Virtue
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779466.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select bibliography
  • Anne Margaret Baxley, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Kant's Theory of Virtue
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779466.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select bibliography
  • Anne Margaret Baxley, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Kant's Theory of Virtue
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779466.007
Available formats
×