Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:37:47.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Adjoint methods for PDEs: a posteriori error analysis and postprocessing by duality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2010

Michael B. Giles
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QD, England
Endre Süli
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QD, England
Arieh Iserles
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

We give an overview of recent developments concerning the use of adjoint methods in two areas: the a posteriori error analysis of finite element methods for the numerical solution of partial differential equations where the quantity of interest is a functional of the solution, and superconvergent extraction of integral functionals by postprocessing.

Introduction

Output functionals

In many scientific and engineering applications that lead to the numerical approximation of solutions to partial differential equations, the objective is merely a rough, qualitative assessment of the details of the analytical solution over the computational domain, the quantitative concern being directed towards a few output functionals, derived quantities of particular engineering or scientific relevance.

For example, in aeronautical engineering, a CFD calculation of the flow around a transport aircraft at cruise conditions might be performed to investigate whether there are any unexpected shocks on the pylon connecting the engine to the wing, or whether there is an unexpected boundary layer separation caused by the main shock on the wing's suction surface. However, the engineer's overall concern is the impact of such phenomena on the lift and drag on the aircraft, and the quality of the CFD calculation is judged, first and foremost, by the accuracy of the lift and drag predictions. The fine details of the flow field are much less important, and are used only in a qualitative manner to suggest ways in which the design may be modified to improve the lift or drag.

Type
Chapter
Information
Acta Numerica 2002 , pp. 145 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×