Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:33:15.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coping with bereavement

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Margaret Stroebe
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
Henk Schut
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
Wolfgang Stroebe
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Over the course of a lifespan, most people will be confronted with the loss of a close relationship: if attachments have been formed, one is likely to have to suffer the consequences of separation. The term ‘bereavement’ refers to the situation of a person who has recently experienced the loss of someone significant in their lives through that person's death (see ‘Coping with death and dying’). The loss of a family member – such as a parent, partner, sibling or child – are typical examples, although the death of other important relationships – such as a meaningful friendship, classmate or good neighbour – may also be significant. Bereavements evoke grief, which can be defined as a primarily emotional (affective) reaction to the loss through death of a loved one. Affective reactions include yearning and pining and intense feelings of distress over the loss of the deceased person. Grief also incorporates diverse psychological and physical manifestations. The former type of manifestation includes cognitive and social-behavioural reactions such as self-blame and withdrawal from others. The latter includes physiological/somatic reactions, such as head- and stomach ache, and increased vulnerability to diseases. Sometimes mourning is used interchangeably with grief. However, there are good reasons to define mourning as the social expressions or acts expressive of grief that are shaped by the practices of a given society or cultural group. It is worth noting that researchers following the psychoanalytic tradition often use the term ‘mourning’ rather than ‘grief ’ to denote the psychological reaction to bereavement.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonanno, G. (2001). Grief and emotion: a social-functional perspective. In Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping, and care (pp. 493–515). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Bonanno, G. & Kaltman, S. (1999). Toward an integrative perspective on bereavement. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 760–76.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
Folkman, S. (2001). Revised coping theory and the process of bereavement. In Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H.A.W. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care (pp. 563–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J. & Longis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 571–9.Google Scholar
Folkman, S., Chesney, M., Collette, L., Boccelari, A. & Cooke, M. (1996). Post-bereavement depressive mood and its prebereavement predictors in HIV+ and HIV− gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 336–48.Google Scholar
Fraley, C. & Bonanno, G. (2004). Attachment and loss: a test of three competing models on the association between attachment-related avoidance and adaptation to bereavement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 878–90.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1917/1957). Mourning and melancholia. In Strachey, J. (Ed. & Trans.). Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (pp. 152–70). London: Hogarth Press, 1957.
Heck, G. van & de Ridder, D. (2001). Assessment of coping with loss: dimensions and measurement. In Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care (pp. 449–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Jordan, J. & Neimeyer, R. (2003). Does grief counseling work?Death Studies, 27, 765–86.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Li, J., Precht, D., Mortensen, B. & Olsen, J. (2003). Mortality in parents after death of a child in Denmark: a nationwide follow-up study. The Lancet, 361, 363–7.Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Ruminative coping and adjustment to bereavement. In Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care (pp. 545–62). Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Parkes, C. M. (1972/1996). Bereavement: studies of grief in adult life. Harmondsworth: Penguin/London: Routledge.
Parkes, C. M. (1993). Bereavement as a psychosocial transition: processes of adaptation to change. In Stroebe, M. S., Stroebe, W. & Hansson, R. O. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement: theory, research, and intervention (pp. 91–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pennebaker, J. W. & Keough, K. A. (1999). Revealing, organizing, and reorganizing the self in response to stress and emotion. In Contrada, R. J. & Ashmore, R. D. (Eds.). Self, social identity, and physical health: interdisciplinary explorations (pp. 101–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rubin, S. & Malkinson, R. (2001). Parental responses to loss across the life cycle: clinical and research perspectives. In Stroebe, M., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping, and care (pp. 219–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Schut, H., Stroebe, M. S., Keijser, J. & Bout, J. (1997). Intervention for the bereaved: gender differences in the efficacy of grief counselling. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 63–72.Google Scholar
Schut, H., Stroebe, M. S., van den Bout, J. & Terheggen, M. (2001). The efficacy of bereavement interventions: Determining who benefits. In: Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W., & Schut, H. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care (pp. 705–38). Washington: American Psychological Association Books.
Stroebe, M. S. (1992). Coping with bereavement: a review of the grief work hypothesis. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 26, 19–42.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M. S. & Schut, H. (1999). The Dual Process Model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. Death Studies, 23, 197–224.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M. S. & Schut, H. (2001a). Models of coping with bereavement: a review. In Stroebe, M., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H.. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping, and care (pp. 375–404). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Stroebe, M. S. & Schut, H. (2001b). Meaning making in the Dual Process Model. In Neimeyer, R. (Ed.). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss (pp. 55–73). Washington: American Psychological Association Press.
Stroebe, M. S., Schut, H. & Stroebe, W. (2005). Attachment in coping with bereavement: A theoretical integration. Review of General Psychology, 9, 48–66.
Stroebe, M. S. & Stroebe, W. (1993). The mortality of bereavement: A review. In Stroebe, M. S., Stroebe, W. & Hansson, R. O. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement: theory, research, and intervention (pp. 175–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stroebe, M. S., Stroebe, W., Schut, H., Zech, E. & Bout, J. (2002). Does disclosure of emotions facilitate recovery from bereavement? Evidence from two prospective studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 169–78.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W. (2000). Social psychology and health. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Stroebe, W. & Stroebe, M. S. (1987). Bereavement and health.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stroebe, W. & Schut, H. (2001). Risk factors in bereavement outcome: A methodological and empirical review. In Stroebe, M., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 349–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Stroebe, W., Stroebe, M. S., Abakoumkin, G. & Schut, H. (1996). The role of loneliness and social support in adjustment to loss: a test of attachment versus stress theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1241–9.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1988). Loss and recovery. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 37–52.Google Scholar
Wikan, U. (1988). Bereavement and loss in two Muslim communities: Egypt and Bali compared. Social Science and Medicine, 27, 451–60.Google Scholar
Winchester-Nadeau, J. (2001). Meaning-making in family bereavement: a family systems approach. In Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W. & Schut, H. (Eds.). Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping, and care (pp. 329–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Worden, W. (1982/1991/2002). Grief counseling and grief therapy: a handbook for the health care practitioner. New York: Springer.
Wortman, C. & Silver, R. (1987). Coping with irrevocable loss. In Bos, G. & Bryant, B. (Eds.). Cataclysms, crises, and catastrophes: psychology in action (pp. 189–235). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Wortman, C. & Silver, R. (1989). The myths of coping with loss. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 349–57.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×