Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:26:28.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface and Acknowledgments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2009

Philip L. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Aquinas Professor of Historical Theology in the Candler School of Theology Emory University; Senior Fellow in the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University
John Witte Jr.
Affiliation:
Jonas Robitscher Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University
Philip L. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
John Witte
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Throughout much of the West today, marriage formation requires the execution of a written marriage contract – usually a marriage certificate that is signed by the couple and their witnesses and registered with a government official. These publicly registered marriage contracts can be anticipated by private engagement and prenuptial contracts respecting the parties' property, custodial, and other rights before, during, and after the marriage. Marriage contracts may also be accompanied by public notices and invitations; elaborate liturgies or ceremonies; ritual exchanges of promises, rings, and other property; and lavish parties and lush honeymoons. But none of this is essential to the validity of the marriage today: the properly signed marriage certificate is enough to make a marriage.

In the pre-modern West, both the documentation and the formation of marriage were considerably more complex and variegated. Most so-called marriage contracts in the Middle Ages were, in fact, primarily marriage settlements: they recorded agreements about transfers of marital property, and although they often referred to the mutual consent of the parties to form a marital union, they did so only to situate the settlement in its proper context. Moreover, the relationship between written marriage contracts and the contract of marriage per se varied considerably over time and across cultures. Some of the documents recorded the marriage itself; some did not. Some of them were intended for use at weddings; some were not. Some of the documents included commentary on the legal, ethical, or religious function of marriage; some did not.

Type
Chapter
Information
To Have and to Hold
Marrying and its Documentation in Western Christendom, 400–1600
, pp. ix - xiv
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Preface and Acknowledgments
    • By Philip L. Reynolds, Aquinas Professor of Historical Theology in the Candler School of Theology Emory University; Senior Fellow in the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University, John Witte, Jr., Jonas Robitscher Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University
  • Edited by Philip L. Reynolds, Emory University, Atlanta, John Witte, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: To Have and to Hold
  • Online publication: 12 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511769.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Preface and Acknowledgments
    • By Philip L. Reynolds, Aquinas Professor of Historical Theology in the Candler School of Theology Emory University; Senior Fellow in the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University, John Witte, Jr., Jonas Robitscher Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University
  • Edited by Philip L. Reynolds, Emory University, Atlanta, John Witte, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: To Have and to Hold
  • Online publication: 12 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511769.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Preface and Acknowledgments
    • By Philip L. Reynolds, Aquinas Professor of Historical Theology in the Candler School of Theology Emory University; Senior Fellow in the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University, John Witte, Jr., Jonas Robitscher Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Study of Law and Religion, Emory University
  • Edited by Philip L. Reynolds, Emory University, Atlanta, John Witte, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: To Have and to Hold
  • Online publication: 12 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511769.001
Available formats
×