Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:46:33.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 14 - Automated Patient Follow-Up Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Jennifer L. Wiler
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Medicine
Jesse M. Pines
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Michael J. Ward
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keith, KD, Bocka, JJ, Kobernick, MS, et al. Emergency department revisits. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1989;18(9):964968.Google Scholar
Nuñez, S, Hexdall, A, Aguirre-Jaime, A. Unscheduled returns to the emergency department: an outcome of medical errors? Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2006;15(2):102108.Google Scholar
Hu, KW, Lu, YH, Lin, HJ, et al. Unscheduled return visits with and without admission post emergency department discharge. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012;43(6):11101118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabayan, GZ, Derose, SF, Asch, SM, et al. Patterns and predictors of short-term death after emergency department discharge. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2011;58(6):551558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rising, KL, Victor, TW, Wiebe, DJ, et al. Patient returns to the emergency department: the time-to-return curve. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014;21(8):864871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, S, Gee, M, Booth, A, et al. Targeting the Use of Reminders and Notifications for Uptake by Populations (TURNUP): a systematic review and evidence synthesis. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2014;2(34):1184.Google Scholar
Vaiva, G, Vaiva, G, Ducrocq, F, et al. Effect of telephone contact on further suicide attempts in patients discharged from an emergency department: randomised controlled study. BMJ. 2006;332(7552):12411245.Google Scholar
Guss, DA, Gray, S, Castillo, EM. The impact of patient telephone call after discharge on likelihood to recommend in an academic emergency department. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014;46(4):560566.Google Scholar
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Improving patient satisfaction in the emergency department (ED) with a call back clerk. 2008. Available at: www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/2013/04/post-visit-patient-contact-improves-patient-satisfaction.html. Accessed April 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Fox, S, Duggan, M. Mobile Health 2012. 2012. Available at www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_MobileHealth2012_FINAL.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Ranney, ML, Choo, EK, Wang, Y, et al. Emergency department patients’ preferences for technology-based behavioral interventions. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2012 Aug;60(2):218227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabbatini, AK, Kocher, KE, Basu, A, et al. In-hospital outcomes and costs among patients hospitalized during a return visit to the emergency department. JAMA. 2016;315(7):663.Google Scholar
Patel, PB, Vinson, DR. Physician e-mail and telephone contact after emergency department visit improves patient satisfaction: a crossover trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2013;61(6):631637.Google Scholar
Arora, S, Burner, E, Terp, S, et al. Improving attendance at post-emergency department follow-up via automated text message appointment reminders: a randomized controlled trial. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2015;22(1):3137.Google Scholar
Sharp, B, Singal, B, Pulia, M, et al. You’ve got mail … and need follow-up: the effect and patient perception of e-mail follow-up reminders after emergency department discharge. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2015;22(1):4753.Google Scholar
Biese, K, Lamantia, M, Shofer, F, et al. A randomized trial exploring the effect of a telephone call follow-up on care plan compliance among older adults discharged home from the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014;21(2):188195.Google Scholar
Arora, S, Peters, AL, Burner, E, et al. Trial to examine text message-based mhealth in emergency department patients with diabetes (TExT-MED): a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2014;63(6).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suffoletto, B, Kristan, J, Chung, T, et al. An interactive text message intervention to reduce binge drinking in young adults: a randomized controlled trial with 9-month outcomes. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142877.Google Scholar
Ranney, ML, et al. A mixed methods pilot study of a depression prevention intervention for adolescents in the emergency department. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2016 Jun (published online).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thew, J. A better way to elicit patient feedback. 2015. Available at http://healthleadersmedia.com/page-1/NRS-318250/A-Better-Way-to-Elicit-Patient-Feedback.Google Scholar
McInnes, DK, Petrakis, BA, Gifford, AL, et al. Retaining homeless veterans in outpatient care: a pilot study of mobile phone text message appointment reminders. American Journal of Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl. 4):S588S594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M. Technology Device Ownership: 2015. Available at www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/technology-device-ownership-2015/. Accessed April 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Ranney, ML, Thorsen, M, Patena, JV, et al. You need to get them where they feel it: conflicting perspectives on how to maximize the structure of text-message psychological interventions for adolescents. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2015-March https://experts.umich.edu/en/publications/you-need-to-get-them-where-they-feel-it-conflicting-perspectives-CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irizarry, T, DeVito, Dabbs A, et al. Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17(6):e148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×