Bibliography

Henry E. Allison

doi:10.1017/9781316535196.012

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2019

Henry E. Allison

Show author details

Henry E. Allison: Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Kant's Conception of Freedom
A Developmental and Critical Analysis
, pp. 504 - 514

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535196.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberg, Jeremiah, “Metaphysics as Kant’s coquette: Rousseau’s influence on Dreams of a Spirit-Seer,” Kantian Review, 20 (2015), 347–71.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alberg, Jeremiah, “What dreams may come: Kant’s Träume eines Geistersehers elucidated by the dreams of a coquette,” Kant-Studien, 106 (2015) 169–200.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexander, H. G. (Ed.), The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence, Together with Extracts from Newton’s Principia and Opticks (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., “Comments on Guyer,” Inquiry, 50 (2007), 480–88.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Essays on Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., “The concept of freedom in Kant’s ‘semi-critical’ ethics,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 68 (1986), 96–115.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., “Kant’s critique of Berkeley,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11 (1973), 43–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRef Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An Analytical-Historical Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and enlarged edn. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., “Practical and transcendental freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien, 73 (1982), 271–90.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., “From Transcendental Realism to Transcendental Idealism: The nature and significance of Kant’s Transcendental Turn,” in Gardner, Sebastian and Grist, Matthew (Eds.), The Transcendental Turn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 20–34.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E. and Heath, Peter (Eds.), Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, translated by Allison, Henry E., Heath, Peter, Hatfield, Gary and Friedman, Michael, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, Interpreting Kant’s Critiques (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a regressive argument,” Kant-Studien, 69 (1978), 273–87.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, “Vindicating autonomy: Kant, Sartre, and O’Neill,” in Sensen, Oliver (Ed.), Kant on Moral Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 53–70.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl and Steve, Naragon (Eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Anderson-Gold, Sharon, “Kant’s rejection of devilishness: The limits of human volition,” Idealistic Studies, 14 (1984), 35–48.Google Scholar

Aune, Bruce, Kant’s Theory of Morals (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander, Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials, edited and translated by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014).Google Scholar

Baxley, Anne Margaret, “Autocracy and autonomy,” Kant-Studien, 94 (2003), 1–23.Google Scholar

Baxley, Anne Margaret, Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White, Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White, Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White, “Five concepts of freedom in Kant,” in Srzednick, J. T. J. (Ed.), Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction: A Festschrift to Stephan Körner (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 35–51.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan, Kant’s Dialectic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Bittner, Rüdiger, What Reason Demands, translated by Talbot, Theodore (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Bojanowski, Jochen, “Kant on the justification of moral principles,” Kant-Studien, 108 (2017), 55–88.Google Scholar

Bojanowski, Jochen, Kant’s Theorie der Freiheit: Rekonstruktion und Rehabilitierung (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006).Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard, “Der Zirkel im dritten Abschnitt von Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Oberer, Hariolf and Seel, Gerhard (Eds.), Kant: Analysen–Probleme–Kritik (Wurtburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1988), pp. 169–91.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard, “Kant as rebel against the social order,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 185–97.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D., “Some reflections on moral sense theories in ethics,” reprinted in Sellars, W. S. and Hospers, J. (Eds.), Readings in Ethical Theory (New York, NY: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1952), pp. 363–92.Google Scholar

Carnois, Bernard, The Coherence of Kant’s Doctrine of Freedom, translated by Booth, David (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst, “Kant and Rousseau,” in Rousseau, Kant, Goethe, translated by Gutmann, James, Kristeller, Paul Oskar, and Randall, John Hermann Jr. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945), pp. 1–60.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew, “Kant, modality, and the most real being,” Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie, 91 (2009), 157–91.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew, “Kant, real possibility, and the threat of Spinoza,” Mind, 121 (2012), 635–75.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ted, “Why beauty is the symbol of morality,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul (Eds.), Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 221–36.Google Scholar

Crawford, Donald W., Kant’s Aesthetic Theory (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August, Anweisung vernünftig zu leben (1744), reprinted in Christian August Crusius: Die philosphischen Hauptwerke, Vol. 3, edited by Tonelli, Giorgio (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1969).Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August, Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft=Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den zufälligen entgegen gestetzt (1745), reprinted in Christian August Crusius: Die philosphischen Hauptwerke, Vol. 2, edited by Tonelli, Giorgio (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1964).Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August, Weg zur Gewissheit und Zuverlässigkeit der mensclichen Erknntniss (1747), reprinted in Christian August Crusius: Die philosphischen Hauptwerke, Vol. 3, edited by Tonelli, Giorgio (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965).Google Scholar

Delbois, Victor, La Philosophie pratique de Kant, 3rd edn. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1969).Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C., Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Dent, Nicholas, Rousseau (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Düsing, Klaus, Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff, Kantstudien Ergänzungshefte, Vol. 96 (Bonn: H. Bouvier und Co. Verlag, 1968).Google Scholar

Dyck, Corey W. “Chimerical ethics and flattering moralists: Baumgarten’s influence on Kant’s moral theory in the Observations and Remarks,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 38–56.Google Scholar

Dyck, Corey W. Kant & Rational Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Erdmann, Benno (Ed.), Reflexionen Kants zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag [R. Reisland], 1882).Google Scholar

Esteves, Julio, “The alleged incompatibility between the concepts of practical freedom in the Dialectic and in the Canon of the Critique of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 336–71.Google Scholar

Ewing, A. C., A Short Commentary on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason,” 2nd edn. (London: Methuen, 1950).Google Scholar

Firestone, Chris L. and Jacobs, Nathan, In Defense of Kant’s Religion (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Frankena, William, “Hutcheson’s moral sense theory,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 16 (1955), 356–75.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul W., All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Frierson, Patrick, “Two concepts of universality in Kant’s moral theory,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Frierson, Patrick and Guyer, Paul (Eds.), Kant: Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Guéroult, Martial, “Canon de la raison pure et critique de la raison pratique,” Revue internationale de la philosophie, 8 (1954), 331–57.Google Scholar

Gregor, Mary, J., Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant’s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten (Oxford: Blackwell, 1963).Google Scholar

Gregor, Mary, J. (Ed.), Practical Philosophy, translated by Gregor, Mary J., The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Grier, Michelle, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “Freedom as the foundation of morality: Kant’s early efforts,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 77–98.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “Naturalistic and transcendental moments in Kant’s moral philosophy,” Inquiry, 50 (2007), 444–64.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, “Pleasure and society in Kant’s theory of taste,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul (Eds.), Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp 21–54.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul (Ed.), Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated by Matthews, Eric, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul Notes and Fragments, translated by Guyer, Paul, Bowman, Curtis and Rauscher, Frederick, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B. (Eds.), Lectures on Ethics, translated by Heath, Peter, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 3, translated by Haldane, E. S. and Simson, Frances H. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by Miller, A. V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Heimsoeth, Heinz, “Freiheit und Charakter nach den Kant-Reflexionen Nr. 5611 bis 5620,” in Arnold, Wilhelm and Zeltner, Hermann (Eds.), Tradition und Kritik, Festschrift für Rudolf Zocher zum 80, Geburtstag (Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann, 1967), pp. 123–44.Google Scholar

Heimsoeth, Heinz, Transzendental Dialektik: ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 4 vols. (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1968).Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, “Concerning Kant’s earliest ethics: An attempt at a reconstruction,” in Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard (Eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 13–37.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, “The concept of moral insight and Kant’s doctrine of the fact of reason,” in Velkley, Richard (Ed.), The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, “Das Prinzip der Kantischen Ethik,” Philosophische Rundschau, 2 (1954–5), 20–38.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, “The deduction of the moral law: The reasons for the obscurity of the final section of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Guyer, Paul (Ed.), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, “Hutcheson und Kant,” Kant-Studien, 49 (1957), 49–69.Google Scholar

Home, Henry (Lord Kames), “Essays on the Principles of Morals and Natural Religion (selections),” in Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Ed.), British Moralists, Vol. 2 (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964), pp. 300–25.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis, An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, edited with an introduction by Aaron Garrett (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc., 2002).Google Scholar

Insole, Christopher, Kant and the Creation of Freedom: A Theological Problem (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence, “Morality and personality: Kant and Green,” in Wood, Allen W. (Ed.), Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), pp. 31–56.Google Scholar

Josifovic, Sasa, “Das ‘Kanon-Problem’ in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft,” Kant-Studien, 106 (2015), 487–506.Google Scholar

Kemp Smith, Norman, A Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason,” 2nd edn. revised and enlarged (New York, NY: Humanities Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline, “Moral consciousness and the fact of reason,” in Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens (Eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Kohl, Markus, “Transcendental and practical freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien, 105 (2014), 313–35.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M., “Kant’s analysis of obligation: The argument of Foundations I,” The Monist, 72 (1989), 311–40.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, “Collins: Kant’s proto-critical position,” in Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver (Eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 51–67.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, Kant: A Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

La Mettrie, Julien Offray de, Man a Machine, French–English edn. (La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Company, 1953).Google Scholar

Laywine, Alison, Kant’s Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1993).Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W., New Essays on Human Understanding, edited and translated by Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. and Zöller, Günter (Eds.), Anthropology, History, and Education, translated by Louden, Robert B. and Zöller, Günter, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Lovejoy, Arthur O., The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (New York, NY: Harper, 1960).Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael H., “Kant’s application of the analytic/synthetic distinction to imperatives,” Dialogue, 18 (1979), 373–91.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedric, Philosophische Sittenlehre, 5 vols. (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 2007).Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y., “Omnis determinatio est negatio,” in Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Förster, Eckart (Eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 175–96.Google Scholar

Menzer, Paul, “Der Entwicklungsgang der Kantischen Ethik in den Jahren 1760–1785,” Erster Abschnitt, Kant-Studien, 2 (1898), 290–322.Google Scholar

Menzer, Paul, “Der Entwicklungsgang der Kantischen Ethik in den Jahren 1760–1785,” Zweiter Abschnitt, Kant-Studien, 3 (1899), 41–104.Google Scholar

Michalson, Gordon E. Jr., Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Munzel, Felicitas, “The beautiful is the symbol of the morally-good: Kant’s philosophical basis of proof for the idea of the morally-good,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33 (1995), 301–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick, Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love, Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Oberst, Michael, “Two worlds and two aspects: On Kant’s distinction between things in themselves and appearances,” Kantian Review, 20 (2015), 53–75.Google Scholar

Ortwein, Birger, Kants problematische Freiheitslehre (Bonn: Bouvier, 1983).Google Scholar

Papish, Laura, Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Paton, H. J., The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, 3rd edn. (London: Hutchinson & Co, 1958).Google Scholar

Potter, Nelson, “The Argument of Kant’s Groundwork, Chapter 1,” in Guyer, Paul (Ed.), Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield, 1998), pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

Prauss, Gerold, Kant über Freiheit als Autonomie (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1983).Google Scholar

Proops, Ian, “Kant’s legal metaphor and the nature of a deduction,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41 (2003), 209–29.Google Scholar

Quarfood, Marcel, “The circle and the two standpoints,” in Horn, Christoph and Schönecker, Dieter (Eds.), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006), pp. 285–300.Google Scholar

Reath, Andrews, “Hedonism, heteronomy and Kant’s principle of happiness,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 70 (1989), 42–72.Google Scholar

Reath, Andrews, “Kant’s theory of moral sensibility: Respect for the moral law and the influence of inclination,” Kant-Studien, 80 (1989), 284–302.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reinhold, Karl Leonhard, Einige Bemerkungen über die in der Einleitung zu den “Metaphysischen Anfangsgründen der Rechtslehre” von I Kant aufgestellten Begriffe von der Freiheit des Willens, in Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad (Eds.), Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1975), pp. 310–24.Google Scholar

Rischmüller, Marie (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Bemerkungen in den “Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen” (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991).Google Scholar

Röttges, Heinz, “Kants Auflösung der Freiheitsantinomie,” Kant-Studien, 65 (1974), 33–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited by Gourevitch, Victor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997a).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile, translated with introduction and notes by Bloom, Allan (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile or On Education, translated and edited by Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2010).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Julie or the New Heloise, translated and annotated by Stewart, Philip and Vache, Jean, The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. 6 (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1997).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy, edited by Masters, Roger D., translated by Masters, Judith R. (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind (New York, NY: Barns & Noble, 1949).Google Scholar

Schiller, Fredrich. Über Anmut und Würde, Schillers Werke, Bd. 11 (Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta’schen, 1867), pp. 238–96.Google Scholar

Schlipp, Paul Arthur, Kant’s Pre-critical Ethics, 2nd edn. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Schmucker, Josef, Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants (Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain, 1961).Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter, Kant: Grundlegung III Die Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs (Freiburg/Munich: Verlag Karl Alber, 1999).Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter, Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie, Kantstudien Ergänzungshefte 149 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005).Google Scholar

Schönfeld, Martin, The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur, On the Basis of Morality, translated by Payne, E. F. (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965).Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur, The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 1, translated by Payne, E. F. (Indian Hills, CO: Falcon Wing’s Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Schulz, Eberhard Günter, Rehbergs Opposition gegen Kants Ethik, Eine Untersuchung ihrer Grundlegung, ihrer Berücksichtigung durch Kant und ihrer Wirkungen auf Reinhold, Schiller, Fichte (Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 1975).Google Scholar

Schulz, Johann, “Review of Kant’s Inaugural Dissertation,” Appendix B in Exposition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Morrison, James C. (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Clemens, “Die Anfänge des Projekts einer Metaphysik der Sitten zu den wolffianischen Wurzeln einer kantischen Schlüsselidee,” in Volker, Gerhardt, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Schumacher, Ralph (Eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 2 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001), pp. 52–8.Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Clemens, Kategorische und andere Imperative: Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785 (Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Clemens, “The Theory of Obligation in Wolff, Baumgarten, and the early Kant,” in Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried (Eds.), Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy, translated by Walker, Nicholas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 58–73.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Albert, Die Religionsphilosophie Kants von der Kritik der reinen Vernunft bis zur Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft (Freiburg: J. C. D. Mohr, 1899).Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfred, Essays in Philosophy and Its History (Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel, 1974).Google Scholar

Shea, William R., “Filled with wonder: Kant’s cosmological essay, the Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens,” in Butts, Robert E. (Ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986), pp. 95–124.Google Scholar

Shell, Susan Meld, The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation and Community (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2005).Google Scholar

Silber, John, “The ethical significance of Kant’s religion,” introduction to the English translation of Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone (New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1960).Google Scholar

Stang, Nicholas. “Kant’s possibility proof,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 27 (2010), 275–99.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Vorlesung zur Moral Philosophie (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F., The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar

Thorndike, Oliver, “Ethica deceptrix: The significance of Baumgarten’s notion of a chimerical ethics for the development of Kant’s moral philosophy,” in Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo R., de Almeida, Guido A., and Ruffing, Margit (Eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants, Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008), pp. 451–61.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens, “Reversal or retreat? Kant’s deductions of freedom and morality,” in Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens (Eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 73–89.Google Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio, “Von den verschiedenen Bedeutungen des Wortes Zweckmässigkeit in der Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Kant-Studien, 49 (1957–8), 154–66.Google Scholar

Vaihinger, Hans, The Philosophy of As If, trans. Ogden, C. K., 2nd edn. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1935).Google Scholar

Velkley, Richard L., Freedom and the End of Reason (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf (Eds.), Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, translated by Walford, David in collaboration with Meerbote, Ralf, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Ware, Owen, “Rethinking Kant’s fact of reason,” Philosopher’s Imprint, 14 (2014), 1–21.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric (Ed.), Natural Science, translated by Beck, Lewis White, Edwards, Jeffrey B., Reinhardt, Olaf, Schönfeld, Martin and Watkins, Eric, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus, Praktische Vernunft: Handlungstheorie und Moralbegründung bei Kant (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzerg, 1992).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961).Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian, Vernünftige Gedanken von der Kräften des mensclichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkenntnis der Wahrheit, edited by Werner Arndt, von Hans (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965).Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian, Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, Auch allen Dingen überhaupt, Den Leibhabern der Wahrheit mitgetheilet (1751) (Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Wolff, Michael, “Warum das Faktum der Vernunft ein Faktum ist, Auflösung einiger Verständnissschwierigkeiten I Kants Grundlegung der Moral,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 57 (2009), 511–49.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W., Hegel’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W., Kantian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W., “Kant’s compatibilism,” in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), 73–101.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W., Kant’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W., “Kant’s fourth proposition: The unsociable sociability of human nature,” in Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg and Schmidt, James (Eds.), Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 112–28.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W., Kant’s Moral Religion (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George (Eds.), Religion and Rational Theology, translated by Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Young, J. Michael (Ed.), Lectures on Logic, translated by Young, J. Michael, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Zammito, John, H., The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive