Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
6 - Moral Sentimentalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory , pp. 91 - 111Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Applebaum, Arthur, 2000. Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1995. Poetics, ed. and tr. Halliwell, Stephen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, 1962. ‘Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation’, in Bowring, J.., ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Boo, Katherine, 2012. Behind the Beautiful Forevers: Life, Death and Hope in a Mumbai Undercity. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Box, M. A., 1990. The Suasive Art of David Hume. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coons, Christian and Weber, Michael, 2014. ‘Introduction: investigating the core concept and its moral status’, in Coons, Christian and Weber, Michael, eds., Manipulation: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio, 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur, 1985. ‘Philosophy as/and/of literature’, in Rajchman, John and West, Cornel, eds., Post-analytic Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, 1995. ‘Hume and the invention of utilitarianism’, in Stewart, M A. and Wright, John, eds., Hume and Hume’s Connexions. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 58–82.Google Scholar
Fassin, Didier, 2013. Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent, 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Michael, 2007. ‘John Rawls: between two enlightenments’, Political Theory 35, 756–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Michael, 2010. The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Michael, 2013. ‘Sentimentalism without relativism’ in Fleming, James, ed., NOMOS LIII: Passions and Emotions. New York University Press, 19–37.Google Scholar
Frazer, Michael, 2015. ‘Anatomist and painter: Hume’s struggles as a sentimental stylist’, in Kerr, Heather, Lemmings, David and Phiddian, Robert, eds., Passions, Sympathy and Print Culture: Public Opinion and Emotional Authenticity in Eighteenth-Century Britain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frazer, Michael, Forthcoming. ‘Interdisciplinary before the disciplines: sentimentalism and the science of man’, in Debes, R. and Stueber, Karsten, eds., Taking Ethical Sentimentalism Seriously. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan, 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Alice, 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Neil, 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guenther, Lisa, 2013. Solitary Confinement: Social Death and Its Afterlives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, 2001. ‘The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment’, Psychological Review 108, 814–34.Google Scholar
Hall, Cheryl, 2005. The Trouble with Passion: Political Theory Beyond the Reign of Reason. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hume, David, 1985. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Revised Edition. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, David, 2000a. A Treatise of Human Nature, eds. Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David, 2000b. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Beauchamp, Tom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca, 2011. Public Passion: Rethinking the Grounds for Political Justice. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Sharon, 2008. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, Neuman, Russell and Mackuen, Michael, 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun, 2004. Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, 1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, 1995. Poetic Justice. The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse, 2011. ‘Is empathy necessary for morality?’, in Coplan, Amy and Goldie, Peter, eds., Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 211–29.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1996. Political Liberalism. Revised Paperback Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, , 2004. Letters from a Stoic: Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium, tr. Campbell, Robin. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, 1972. ‘Famine, affluence, and morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 229–43.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, 1984. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, eds. Macfie, A. L. and Raphael, D. D. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, 1985. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, ed. Bryce, J. C.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C, 1970. ‘Normative and meta-ethics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31, 97–107.Google Scholar
Stewart, John, 2013. The Unity of Content and Form in Philosophical Writing: The Perils of Conformity. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Thacher, David, 2006. ‘The normative case study’, American Journal of Sociology 111, 1631–76.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, 1971. ‘A defense of abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 47–66.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Blakey, 2010. Why Do We Care about Literary Characters? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, 2004. Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1978. Economy and Society, eds. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Westen, Drew, 2007. The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by