Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
12 - Interpreting Texts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory , pp. 243 - 269Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Allen, J. W., 1928. A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Armitage, David, 2013. Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, 1992. ‘Introduction’, in Mill, James, Political Writings, ed. Ball, Terence. Cambridge University Press, ix–xxviii.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, 2004. ‘History and the interpretation of texts’, in Gaus, Gerald and Kukathas, Chandran, eds., Handbook of Political Theory. London: Sage Publications, 18–30.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, 2011. ‘The value of the history of political philosophy’, in Klosko, George, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 47–59.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, Farr, James and Hanson, Russell, eds., 1989. Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert, 2003. ‘Will the real Kant please stand up: the challenge of Enlightenment racism to the study of the history of philosophy’, Radical Philosophy 117, 13–22.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert, 2010. ‘The philosophy of race in the nineteenth century’, in Moyar, Dean, ed., The Routledge Companion to Nineteenth Century Philosophy. London: Routledge. 498–521.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian, 2011. ‘Uncertainty and the history of ideas’, History and Theory 50, 358–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Adrian, 2015a. ‘Philosophy between the lines, or through dubious signs?’, Perspectives on Political Science 44, 162–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Adrian, 2015b. ‘The irrelevance of (Straussian) hermeneutics’, in Schröder, Winfried, ed., Reading Between the Lines: Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Adrian, 2015c. ‘History of political thought as detective-work’, History of European Ideas 41, 1178–94.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian, 2016. ‘Reason, deliberation and the passions’, in Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. Oxford University Press, 195–220.Google Scholar
Boucher, David, 1985. Texts in Context: Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, William and Lambert, Bruce, 2001. ‘The theory-ladenness of observation and the theory-ladenness of the rest of the scientific process’, Philosophy of Science 68 supplement, 176–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, Anne, 2012. Utilitarian Biopolitics: Bentham, Foucault and Modern Power. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Buchan, Bruce and Hill, Lisa, 2014. An Intellectual History of Political Corruption. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Marshall, 1960. ‘Berlin and the liberal tradition’, The Philosophical Quarterly 10, 216–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, Robin, 2015. ‘Thomas Hobbes’s changing account of liberty and challenge to republicanism’, History of Political Thought 36, 281–309.Google Scholar
Dunn, John, 1967. ‘Consent in the political theory of John Locke’, The Historical Journal 10, 153–82.Google Scholar
Dunn, John, 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of The Argument of the ‘Two Treatises of Government’. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John, 1996. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John, 2005. ‘What history can show: Jeremy Waldron’s reading of Locke’s Christian politics’, The Review of Politics 67, 433–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euben, Peter, 1989. ‘Corruption’, in Ball, Terence, Farr, James and Hanson, Russell, eds., Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge University Press, 220–46.Google Scholar
Forrester, Katrina, 2014. ‘Citizenship, war, and the origins of international ethics in American political philosophy, 1960–1975’, The Historical Journal 57, 773–801.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 2009. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978, tr. Burchell, Graham. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Green, Jeffrey, 2015. ‘Political theory as both philosophy and history: a defense against methodological militancy’, Annual Review of Political Science 18, 425–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, Charles, 2016. ‘Genealogical narrative and self-knowledge in Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin and the Foundations of Inequality among Men’, History of European Ideas 42, 276–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich, 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, 1998. On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah, 2014. ‘Intellectual history and the history of philosophy’, History of European Ideas 40, 925–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Paul, 2006. ‘Political theory – the state of the art’, Politics 26, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Paul, 2007. Locke’s Second Treatise of Government: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa, 2012. ‘Doing our own thinking for ourselves: on Quentin Skinner’s genealogical turn’, Journal of the History of Ideas 73, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, Peter, 1988. ‘Introduction’, in Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge University Press, 3–126.Google Scholar
Losonsky, Michael, 2001. Enlightenment and Action from Descartes to Kant: Passionate Thought. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B., 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, John Hope. 1995. ‘Forced to be free’, in Wokler, Robert, ed., Rousseau and Liberty. Manchester University Press, 121–38.Google Scholar
Melzer, Arthur, 2014. Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S., 1989. On Liberty and Other Writings, ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah, 2008. ‘The original meaning of “democracy”: capacity to do things, not majority rule’, Constellations 15, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Niklas, 2012. History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. Oxford: Bergahn Books.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel, 1991. Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. 2nd edition. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna, 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., 1971. Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., 2006. ‘Foundations and moments’, in Brett, Annabel and Tully, James, eds., Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C., 1988. Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin, 1995. The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, William, 2009. ‘Introduction: the study of political thought’, in Richter, William, ed., Approaches to Political Thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1–12.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, 1984. ‘The historiography of philosophy: four genres’, in Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Quentin, eds., Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 49–75.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena, 1997. Rousseau and Geneva: From ‘the First Discourse to The Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 1979. Emile or on Education, ed. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 1997a. ‘The Social Contract,’ in The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 1997b. ‘Considerations on the Government of Poland’, in The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia, 1992. A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schotte, Dietrich, 2015. ‘The virtues and vices of Leo Strauss, historian. A reassessment of Straussian hermeneutics’, in Schröder, Winfried, ed., Reading Between the Lines: Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Daniel and Weiss, Alexander, 2010. ‘Introduction: approaches in the history of political thought’, European Political Science 9, 283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry, 1981. The Methods of Ethics. Seventh edition. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John, 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 1989. ‘The state’, in Ball, Terence, Farr, James and Hanson, Russell, eds., Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge University Press, 90–131.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 1990. ‘The republican ideal of political liberty’, in Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin and Viroli, Maurizio, eds., Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge University Press, 293–309.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2002a. Visions of Politics. Volume I: Regarding Method. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2002b. Visions of Politics. Volume III: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2002c. ‘Interview with Quentin Skinner’, Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 6, 32–63.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2003. ‘States and the freedom of citizens’, in Skinner, Quentin and Stråth, Bo, eds., States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects. Cambridge University Press, 11–27.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2009. ‘A genealogy of the modern state’, Proceedings of the British Academy 162, 325–70.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2012. ‘On politics and history: a discussion with Quentin Skinner’, Journal of Intellectual History and Political Thought 1, 7–31.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, Gopal, 2000. ‘What is the General Will?’, The Philosophical Review 109, 545–81.Google Scholar
Stuurman, Siep, 2000. ‘On intellectual innovation and the methodology of the history of ideas’, Rethinking History 4, 311–19.Google Scholar
Svacek, Victor, 1976. ‘The elusive Marxism of C. B. Macpherson’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 9, 395–422.Google Scholar
Townshend, Jules, 1999. ‘Hobbes as possessive individualist: interrogating the C. B. Macpherson thesis’, Hobbes Studies 12, 52–72.Google Scholar
Tully, James, 1995. ‘Property, self-government and consent’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 28, 105–32.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen, 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, 2002. God, Locke, and Equality. Christian Foundations of John Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard, 2006. ‘Intellectual history and the history of political thought’, in Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, eds., Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 109–29.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, 2013. ‘Analytic political philosophy’, in Beaney, Michael, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 795–822.Google Scholar
Wootton, David, 1992. ‘The Levellers’, in Dunn, John, ed., Democracy: The Unfinished Journey. Oxford University Press, 71–89.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez, 1993. ‘Hobbes’s Early Philosophical Development’, Journal of the History of Ideas 54:3, 505–18.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by