Adeney, E, The Moral Rights of Authors and Performers: An International and Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ades, D, ‘Web of Images’, in Ades, Dawn et al., Francis Bacon (The Tate Gallery in Association with Thames and Hudson 1985).Google Scholar

Allgrove, B and Groom, J, ‘Enforcement in a Digital Context: Intermediary Liability’ in Aplin, T (ed.), Research Handbook on IP and Digital Technologies (Edward Elgar 2020) ch. 25.Google Scholar

Alloway, L, ‘“Pop Art” since 1949’ The Listener (London, 27 December 1962), reprinted in Kalina, R (ed.), Imagining the Present: Essays by Lawrence Alloway (Routledge 2006).Google Scholar

Ap Siôn, P, The Music of Michael Nyman: Texts, Contexts and Intertexts (Ashgate 2007).Google Scholar

Aplin, T, Copyright Law in a Digital Society (Hart 2005).Google Scholar

Aufderheide, P and Jaszi, P, Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright (University of Chicago Press 2011).Google Scholar

Aufderheide, P and Jaszi, P, Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright (2nd ed., University of Chicago Press 2018).Google Scholar

Austin, J F, Proust, Pastiche and the Postmodern or Why Style Matters (Bucknell University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Ballantine, C, Music and Its Social Meanings (Gordon and Breach 1984).Google Scholar

Band, J and Gerafi, J, The Fair Use/Fair Dealing Handbook (Policybandwidth 2013).Google Scholar

Barendt, E, Freedom of Speech (2nd ed., Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Baron, J L, A Treasury of Jewish Quotations (Crown 1956).Google Scholar

Barthes, R, Image, Music, Text (Fontana Press 1984) .Google Scholar

Bartlett, J (1820–1905) and Kaplan, J, Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations (17th ed., Little, Brown 2002; 1st ed. 1855).Google Scholar

Bently, L, ‘Parody and Copyright in the Common Law World’ in Copyright and Freedom of Expression (ALAI 2008) 360.Google Scholar

Bently, L, and Aplin, T, ‘Whatever Became of Global, Mandatory, Fair Use? A Case Study in Dysfunctional Pluralism’ in Frankel, S (ed.), Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? (Edward Elgar 2019) ch. 1.Google Scholar

Bently, L (ed.), International Copyright Law and Practice (LexisNexis 2019, annually updated).Google Scholar

Bercovitz, A and Bercovitz, G, ‘Spain’ in Bently L (ed.), International Copyright Law and Practice (LexisNexis 2019).Google Scholar

Bertrand, A, Droit d’auteur 3rd ed (Dalloz 2010).Google Scholar

Biguenet, J, ‘Double Takes: The Role of Allusion in Cinema’ in Horton, A and McDougal, S Y (eds.), Play It Again, Sam: Retakes on Remakes (University of California Press 1998).Google Scholar

Bjone, C, Philip Johnson and His Mischief: Appropriation in Art and Architecture (Images Publishing Group 2014).Google Scholar

Bliss, M, Brian De Palma (Scarecrow Press Inc 1983).Google Scholar

Blomqvist, J, Primer on International Copyright and Related Rights (Edward Elgar 2014).Google Scholar

Bochumberg, L, Le Droit de Citation (Masson 1994).Google Scholar

Bond, A (ed.), Francis Bacon: Five Decades (Thames and Hudson 2013).Google Scholar

Boozer, J, ‘Crashing the Gates of Insight’ in Kerman, J B (ed.), Retrofitting Blade Runner (Bowling Green University Popular Press 1991).Google Scholar

Bouche, N, Intellectual Property Law in France (2nd ed., Kluwer 2014).Google Scholar

Brandon, J M, ‘Battleship Potemkin’ in Di Mare, P C (ed.), Movies in American History: An Encyclopaedia, vol. 1 (ABC-CLIO 2011).Google Scholar

Browning, D C, Dictionary of Quotations and Proverbs (Chancellor 1952).Google Scholar

Bureau de L’Union, ‘Les Emprunts Licite’, (1924) Le Droit D’Auteur 37.Google Scholar

Burkholder, P, All Made of Tunes: Charles Ives and the Uses of Musical Borrowing (Yale University Press 1995).Google Scholar

Burkholder, P in Sadie, S and Tyrrell, J (ed.), The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians (Oxford University Press 2001) 6.Google Scholar

Burrell, R and Coleman, A, Copyright Exceptions: The Digital Impact (Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Calinescu, M, ‘Rewriting’ in Bertens, H and Fokkema, D W (eds.), International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice (J Benjamins 1997) 243–8.Google Scholar

Chapdelaine, P, Copyright User Rights: Contracts and the Erosion of Property (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Chapin, J, The Book of Catholic Quotations (John Calder 1957).Google Scholar

Christie, I, ‘Introduction: Rediscovering Eisenstein’ in Christie, I and Taylor, R (eds.), Eisenstein Rediscovered (Routledge 1993) 1–30.Google Scholar

Cohen, J M and Cohen, M J, The New Penguin Dictionary of Quotations (Viking 1992).Google Scholar

Coke, V D, The Painter and the Photograph from Delacroix to Warhol (University of New Mexico Press 1964).Google Scholar

Collins Pocket Dictionary of the English Language (Collins 1989).Google Scholar

Colombet, C, Propriété Littéraire et Artistique et Droits Voisins (9th ed., Dalloz 1999).Google Scholar

Correa, C M, Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Commentary on the TRIPs Agreement (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Craig, C J, Copyright, Communication and Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of Copyright Law (Edward Elgar 2011).Google Scholar

Crinson, M, Stirling and Gowan: Architecture from Austerity to Affluence (Yale University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Crofton, I, A Dictionary of Art Quotations (Routledge 1988).Google Scholar

Davidson, C (ed.), Robert A M Stern: Tradition and Invention in Architecture: Conversations and Essays (Yale University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Davies, G and Garnett, K(eds.), Moral Rights (Sweet & Maxwell 2010).Google Scholar

Davies, G and Garnett, K (eds.), Moral Rights (2nd ed., Sweet and Maxwell 2016).Google Scholar

Davison, M, The Legal Protection of Databases (Cambridge University Press 2003).Google Scholar

De Carvalho, N P, The TRIPS Regime of Antitrust and Undisclosed Information (Kluwer 2008).Google Scholar

De Grazia, M, ‘Sanctioning Voice: Quotation Marks, the Abolition of Torture, and the Fifth Amendment’ in Woodmansee, M and Jaszi, P (eds.), The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature (Duke University Press 1994) 281–302.Google Scholar

De Grazia, M, ‘Shakespeare in Quotation Marks’ in Marsden, J I (ed.), The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth (St Martin’s Press 1992) 57–71.Google Scholar

Desbois, H, Le Droit D’Auteur (3rd ed., Dalloz 1978).Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, G B and Dreyfuss, R C, A Neo-Federalist Vision of TRIPS: The Resilience of the International Intellectual Property Regime (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Distel, A, Hoog, M and Moffett, C S, Impressionism: A Centenary Exhibition (Metropolitan Museum of Art 1974).Google Scholar

Douglas, A and Strumpf, M, Webster’s New World Dictionary of Quotations (Macmillan 1998).Google Scholar

Drahos, P, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Dartmouth 1996).Google Scholar

Drassinower, A, What’s Wrong with Copying? (Harvard University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Dusollier, S, ‘Realigning Economic Rights with Exploitation of Works: The Control of Authors over Circulation of Works in the Public Sphere’ in Hugenholtz, P B (ed.), Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright’s Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change (Kluwer 2018) ch. 6, 163–201.Google Scholar

Dworkin, G, ‘Exceptions to Copyright Exclusivity: Is Fair Use Consistent with Article 9.2 Berne and the New International Order’ in Hansen, H (ed.), International Intellectual Property Law and Policy: Volume 4 (Juris 2000) ch. 66.Google Scholar

Dyer, R, Pastiche (Routledge 2007).Google Scholar

Edgar, R, Marland, J, Rawle, S, The Language of Film (2nd ed., Bloomsbury 2015).Google Scholar

Ehrlich, E and DeBruhl, M, The International Thesaurus of Quotations (Harper Perennial 1996).Google Scholar

Elkin-Koren, A C N and Salzberger, E M, The Law and Economics of Intellectual Property in the Digital Age: The Limits of Analysis (Routledge 2013).Google Scholar

Ellickson, R C, Order without Law: How Neighbours Settle Disputes (Harvard University Press 1991).Google Scholar

Emerson, W, ‘Quotation and Originality’ in Emerson, R W, Letters and Social Aims (Houghton Mifflin 1875).Google Scholar

Emery, M, ‘Argentina’ in Bently, L (ed.), International Copyright Law and Practice (LexisNexis. 2019).Google Scholar

Falce, V, ‘Italy,’ in Bently L (ed.), International Copyright Law and Practice (LexisNexis 2019).Google Scholar

Farwell, B, Manet and the Nude: A Study in Iconography in the Second Empire (Garland 1981).Google Scholar

Fergusson, R, The Hamlyn Dictionary of Quotations (Hamlyn 1989).Google Scholar

Ficsor, M, The Law of Copyright and the Internet (Oxford University Press 2002).Google Scholar

Ficsor, M, Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO (WIPO 2003).Google Scholar

Finnegan, R E, Why Do We Quote? The Culture and History of Quotation (Open Book Publishers 2011).Google Scholar

Fisher, W, ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Munzer, S (ed.), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press 2001) ch. 6, 165–99.Google Scholar

Fitzhenry, R I, Say It Again, Sam: A Book of Quotations (Michael O’Mara 1996).Google Scholar

Fontenelle, T, ‘Introduction’ in Fontanelle, Thierry (ed.), Practical Lexicography: A Reader (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Fordham, M and De la Mare, T, ‘Identifying the Principles of Proportionality’ in Jowell, J and Cooper, J (eds.), Understanding Human Rights Principles (Hart 2001) 27–90.Google Scholar

Françon, A, Cours de Propriété Littéraire, artistique et Industriel (Litec 1999).Google Scholar

Fraser, D (ed.), Dictionary of Quotations (Collins 1983).Google Scholar

Fried, M, Manet’s Modernism: Or, The Face of Painting in the 1860s (University of Chicago Press 1996).Google Scholar

Gabbard, K, ‘The Quoter and His Culture’ in Buckner, Reginald and Wieland, Steven (eds.), Jazz in Mind: Essays on the History and Meaning of Jazz (Wayne State University Press 1991).Google Scholar

Garber, M, Quotation Marks (Routledge 2003).Google Scholar

Gardiner, R, Treaty Interpretation (2nd ed., Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Geist, M, The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law (University of Ottawa Press 2013).Google Scholar

Geller, P, ‘Must Copyright Be for Ever Caught between Marketplace and Authorship Norms?’ in Sherman, B and Strowel, A (eds.), Of Authors and Origins (Clarendon Press 1994) 159–201.Google Scholar

Gibson, B, The Instrumental Music of Iannis Xenakis: Theory, Practice, Self-Borrowing (Pendragon Press 2011).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J and Treppoz, E, International Copyright Law: US and EU Perspectives, Text and Cases (Edward Elgar 2015).Google Scholar

Girouard, M, Big Jim (Pimlico 2000).Google Scholar

Godard, J L, Jean-Luc Godard par Jean-Luc Godard (Cahiers du cinema 1985).Google Scholar

Goldstein, P, International Copyright: Principles, Law, Practice (Oxford University Press 2001).Google Scholar

Goldstein, P and Hugenholtz, B, International Copyright: Principles, Law, Practice (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Gombrich, E H, The Ideas of Progress and their Impact on Art (Cooper Union 1971).Google Scholar

Goodman, N, Ways of Worldmaking (Hackett 1978).Google Scholar

Goodwin, J, Eisenstein, Cinema, and History (University of Illinois Press 1993).Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, P, in Francis Bacon and the Masters (Fontanka Publications 2015).Google Scholar

Greenleaf, G and Lindsay, D, Public Rights: Copyright’s Public Domain (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Grosse Ruse-Khan, H, The Protection of Intellectual Property in International Law (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Grønstad, A, Transfigurations: Violence, Death and Masculinity in American Cinema (Amsterdam University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Gruenberger, M, ‘Germany’ in Bently, L (ed.), International Copyright Law and Practice (LexisNexis 2019).Google Scholar

Guibault, L, Copyright Limitations and Contracts: An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability of Limitations on Copyright (Kluwer 2002).Google Scholar

Hanks, P, ‘Definition’ in Durkin, P (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Lexicography (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Harkins, P, ‘Microsampling: From Akufen’s Microhouse to Todd Edwards and the Sound of UK Garage’ in Danielsen, A (ed.), Musical Rhythm in the Age of Digital Reproduction (Ashgate 2010) 177–194.Google Scholar

Heisner, B, Production Design in the Contemporary American Film: A Critical Study of 23 Movies and their Designers (McFarland & Co 2004).Google Scholar

Henderson, C W, The Charles Ives Tunebook (2nd ed., Indiana University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Henning-Bodewig, F, ‘International Unfair Competition Law’ in Hilty, R M and Henning-Bodewig, F (eds.), Law against Unfair Competition – Towards a New Paradigm in Europe? (Springer 2007) ch. 2, 53–60.Google Scholar

Hoesterey, I, Pastiche: Cultural Memory in Art, Film, Literature (Indiana University Press 2001).Google Scholar

Höpperger, M and Senftleben, M, ‘Protection against Unfair Competition at the International Level’ in Hilty, R M and Henning-Bodewig, F (eds.), Law against Unfair Competition – Towards a New Paradigm in Europe? (Springer 2007) ch. 3, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houston, K, Shady Characters: The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and Other Typographical Marks (Norton & Co 2013).Google Scholar

Hudson, E, Drafting Copyright Exceptions: From the Law in Books to the Law in Action (Cambridge University Press 2020).Google Scholar

Hughes, J, ‘Fair Use and Its Politics – at Home and Abroad’ in Okediji, R L (ed.), Copyright Law in an Age of Exceptions and Limitations (Cambridge University Press 2017) ch. 8, 234–274.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P B (ed.), Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright’s Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change (Kluwer 2018).Google Scholar

Iampolski, M, The Memory of Tiresias: Intertextuality and Film (trans. Harsha Ram) (University of California Press 1998).Google Scholar

Iljadica, M, Copyright Beyond Law: Regulating Creativity in the Graffiti Subculture (Hart 2016).Google Scholar

Jacobs, S, Framing Pictures: Film and the Visual Arts (Edinburgh University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Jacques, S, The Parody Exception in Copyright Law (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Jencks, C, ‘Philip Johnson and the Smile of Medusa’ in Petit, Emmanuel (ed.), Philip Johnson: The Constancy of Change (Yale University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Joannides, P, ‘Bacon, Michelangelo and the Classical Tradition’ in Joannides, P, Geitner, A, and Morel, T (eds.), Francis Bacon and the Masters (Fontanka Publications 2015) 26–36.Google Scholar

Johnson, S, A Dictionary of the English Language (W Strahan 1755) 1626 (reprint, New York, 1967).Google Scholar

Kahng, E (ed.), The Repeating Image: multiples in French painting from David to Matisse (Yale University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Kamina, P, ‘France’ in Bently, L (ed.), International Copyright: Law and Practice (LexisNexis 2019).Google Scholar

Katz, M, Capturing Sound: How Technology has Changed Music (University of California Press 2010).Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, A, ‘I Don’t Believe in Word Senses’, in Fontenelle, Thierry (ed.), Practical Lexicography: A Reader (Oxford University Press 2008) ch. 9, 135–51.Google Scholar

Klopmeier, and Arend, in Stoll, P T, Busche, J and Arend, K (eds.), WTO-Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 253–67.Google Scholar

Kolker, R P, Film, Form, and Culture (4th ed., Routledge 2016).Google Scholar

Knapp, L F (ed.), Brian De Palma: Interviews (University Press of Mississippi 2003).Google Scholar

Kur, A, ‘Limitations and Exceptions under the Three-Step Test – How Much Room to Walk the Middle Ground’ in Kur, A and Levin, M (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System: Proposals for Reform of TRIPS (Edward Elgar 2011) ch. 5, 208–61.Google Scholar

Kur, A and Grosse Ruse-Khan, H, ‘Enough Is Enough – The Notion of Binding Ceilings in International Intellectual Property Protection’ in Kur, A and Levin, M (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System – Proposals for Reform of TRIPS (Edward Elgar 2011) ch. 8, 359–407.Google Scholar

Kuspit, D, ‘Some Thoughts about the Significance of Postmodern Appropriation Art’ in Brilliant, R and Kinney, D (eds.), Reuse Value: Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine (Ashgate 2011) 237.Google Scholar

Kvifte, T, ‘Digital Sampling and Analogue Aesthetics’ in Melberg, A (ed.), Aesthetics at Work (Unipub 2007) 193.Google Scholar

Lacasse, S, ‘Intertextuality and Hypertextuality in Recorded Popular Music’ in Talbot, M (ed.), The Musical Work: Reality or Invention? (Liverpool University Press 2000) ch. 2.Google Scholar

Ladas, S P, Patents, Trademarks and Related Rights (Harvard University Press 1975).Google Scholar

Landau, S I, Dictionaries: The Art and Craft of Lexicography (2nd ed., Cambridge University Press 2001).Google Scholar

Levy, E, Cinema of Outsiders: The Rise of American Independent Film (New York University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Lewis, H, ‘No Rules, Just Art’ in The Architecture of Philip Johnson (Bullfinch Press 2002).Google Scholar

Lewis, H and O’Connor, J, Philip Johnson: The Architect in His Own Words (Rizzoli 1994).Google Scholar

MacDonnel, D E, A Dictionary of Quotations in Most Frequent Use: Taken from the Greek, Latin, French, Spanish and Italian Languages (3rd ed., G.G. and J. Robinson 1799).Google Scholar

Masiyakurima, P, ‘The Free Speech Benefits of Fair Dealing Defences’ in Torremans, Paul L C (ed.), Intellectual Property and Human Rights: Enhanced Edition of Copyright and Human Rights (Kluwer 2008) ch. 9, 235–56.Google Scholar

Mauner, G L, Manet, Peintre-Philosophe: A Study of the Painter’s Themes (Pennsylvania State University Press 1975).Google Scholar

Masouyé, C, WIPO Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Paris Act, 1971) (WIPO 1978).Google Scholar

Masouyé, C, WIPO Guide to the Rome Convention and Phonograms Convention (WIPO 1981).Google Scholar

Mazziotti, G, EU Digital Copyright Law and the End-User (Springer 2008).Google Scholar

McKean, J, Leicester University Engineering Building: James Stirling and James Gowan (Phaidon 1994).Google Scholar

McLeod, K and Dicola, P, Creative Licence: The Law and Culture of Digital Sampling (Duke University Press 2011).Google Scholar

McMurtrie, D C, Concerning Quotation Marks (Privately Printed 1934).Google Scholar

Merges, R P, Justifying Intellectual Property (Harvard University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Metzer, D, Quotation and Cultural Meaning in Twentieth Century Music (Cambridge University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Miyakawa, F, Five Percenter Rap (Indiana University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Moreham, N A and Warby, M, Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media (3rd ed., Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Morris, Y S, ‘The Legal Implications Surrounding the Practice of Video Sampling in the Digital Age’ in Greenfield, S and Osborn, G (eds.), Readings in Law and Popular Culture (Routledge 2008) 274–309.Google Scholar

Murray, S O and Roscoe, W, Islamic Homosexualities: Culture, History, and Literature (New York University Press 1997).Google Scholar

The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford University Press 1993).Google Scholar

Ng-Loy, Wee Loon, Law of Intellectual Property of Singapore (rev. ed., Sweet & Maxwell 2009).Google Scholar

Nicol, A, Millar, G and Sharland, A, Media Law & Human Rights (2nd ed., Oxford Uniersity Press 2009).Google Scholar

Nimmer, M B and Nimmer, D, Nimmer on Copyright (Matthew Bender 1996).Google Scholar

O’Grady, J, ‘Introduction’ in Ayer, A J and O’Grady, J (eds.), A Dictionary of Philosophical Quotations (Blackwell 1992).Google Scholar

Ohly, A, ‘European Fundamental Rights and Intellectual Property’ in Ohly, A and Pila, J (eds.), The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology (Oxford University Press 2013) ch. 8, 145–63.Google Scholar

Ohly, A, ‘A Fairness-Based Approach to Economic Rights’ in Hugenholtz, P B (ed.), Rethinking Copyright’s Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change (Kluwer 2018) ch. 4, 83–119.Google Scholar

Okediji, R L, ‘Reframing International Copyright Limitations and Exceptions as Development Policy’ in Okediji, R (ed.), Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions (Cambridge University Press 2016) ch. 14, 429–95.Google Scholar

Okpaluba, J, ‘Digital Sampling and Music Industry Practices, Re-Spun’ in Bowrey, K and Handler, M (eds.), Copyright Law in the Age of the Entertainment Franchise (Cambridge University Press 2014) ch. 4, 75–100.Google Scholar

Owens, C, ‘Philip Johnson: History, Genealogy, Historicism’ in Frampton, Kenneth, Philip Johnson: Processes. The Glass House, 1949 and The AT&T Corporate Headquarters, 1978 (Institute for Architecture & Urban Studies NY 1978).Google Scholar

Petersen, K, ‘Shakespeare and Sententiae: The Use of Quotation in Lucrece’ in Maxwell, J and Rumbold, K (eds.), Shakespeare and Quotation (Cambridge University Press 2018) ch. 2.Google Scholar

Randall, J (ed.), Anthology of Quotations: Over 12,000 Quotations Arranged by Theme (Bloomsbury 2002).Google Scholar

Rathbone, E E, Robinson, W H, Steele, E, and Steele, M, Van Gogh Repetitions (Yale University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Rawls, J, A Theory of Justice (rev. ed., Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Reese-Lawrence, A, James Stirling: Revisionary Modernists (Yale University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Reff, T, Manet, Olympia (Allen Lane 1976).Google Scholar

Reinbothe, J and von Lewinski, S, The WIPO Treaties 1996 (Butterworths 2002).Google Scholar

Ricketson, S, ‘The Berne Convention: The Continued Relevance of an Ancient Text’ in Vaver, D and Bently, L (eds.), Intellectual Property in the New Millennium: Essays in Honour of William R. Cornish (Cambridge University Press 2004) ch. 15, 217–33.Google Scholar

Ricketson, S and Ginsburg, J, International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond (2nd ed., Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar

Ricketson, S and Ginsburg, J, ‘The Berne Convention: Historical and Institutional Aspects’ in Gervais, D J (ed.), International Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2015) ch. 1, 3–36.Google Scholar

Riley, D W, My Soul Looks Back, ‘Less I Forget: A Collection of Quotations by People of Color (Harper Perennial 1995).Google Scholar

Roth, L M, Understanding Architecture: Its Elements, History, Meaning (The Herbert Press 1993/1994).Google Scholar

Russell, J, Francis Bacon (Thames and Hudson 1993).Google Scholar

Sadler, G, ‘A Re-examination of Rameau’s Self-Borrowings’ in Heyer, J H (ed.), Jean-Baptiste Lully and the French Baroque: Essays in Honor of James R. Anthony (Cambridge University Press 1989) 259.Google Scholar

Said, E, Beginnings: Intention and Method (Columbia University Press 1985).Google Scholar

Samuelson, P, ‘Justifications for Copyright Limitations and Exceptions’ in Okediji, R L (ed.), Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions (Cambridge University Press 2016) ch. 1, 12–59.Google Scholar

Senftleben, M, Copyright, Limitations and the Three-Step Test: An Analysis of the Three-Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law (Kluwer 2004).Google Scholar

Senftleben, M, ‘Quotation, Parody and Fair Use’ in Hugenholtz, B, Quaedvlieg, A and Visser, D (eds.), A Century of Dutch Copyright: 1912–2012 (DeLex 2012) 354–5.Google Scholar

Shiffrin, S V, ‘Lockean Arguments for Private Intellectual Property’ in Munzer, S R (ed.), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press 2001) 138–67.Google Scholar

Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles, vol. 2 (6th ed., Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Silbey, J, The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Everyday Intellectual Property (Stanford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Simpson, J A and Weiner, E S C (eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary (Clarendon 1989) vol. XIII.Google Scholar

Sinnreich, A, Mashed Up: Music, Technology and the Rise of Configurable Culture (University of Massachusetts Press 2010).Google Scholar

Slocum, B G, Ordinary Meaning: A Theory of the Most Fundamental Principle of Legal Interpretation (University of Chicago Press 2013).Google Scholar

Stam, R, Film Theory: An Introduction (Blackwell 2000).Google Scholar

Stamatoudi, I, ‘Greece’ in Bently, L (ed.), International Copyright: Law and Practice (LexisNexis 2019).Google Scholar

Steinberg, L, ‘The Glorious Company’ in Lipman, J and Marshall, R, Art about Art (Whitney Museum 1978) 8–31.Google Scholar

Stern, R, Modern Classicism (Thames and Hudson 1988).Google Scholar

Stoll, P T, Busche, J and Arend, K (eds.), WTO-Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).Google Scholar

Sylvester, D, Interviews with Francis Bacon (3rd ed., Thames and Hudson 1987).Google Scholar

Tafuri, M, ‘L’Architecture dans le Boudoir: The Language of Criticism and the Criticism of Language’ in Hays, K M (ed.), Architecture Theory since 1968 (MIT Press 1998).Google Scholar

Tant, R, ‘Archive’ in Gale, M and Stephens, C (eds.), Francis Bacon (Tate Publishing 2008).Google Scholar

Taylor, R, The Battleship Potemkin: The Film Companion (I. B. Tauris 2000).Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, M and Hyman, I, Architecture: From Prehistory to Postmodernism (2nd ed., Pearson 2001).Google Scholar

Tucker, P H, Manet’s Le déjeuner sur L’herbe (Cambridge University Press 1998).Google Scholar

Tullio, de Mauro, Grande Dizionario Italiano dell’uso (Torino 1999).Google Scholar

Urbina, F J, A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Van Eechoud, M, Hugenholtz, P B, Van Gompel, S, Guibault, L and Helberger, N, Harmonizing European Copyright Law: The Challenges of Better Lawmaking (Kluwer 2009).Google Scholar

Veneciano, J D, ‘Louis Armstrong, Bricolage and the Aesthetics of Swing’ in O’Meally, R G, Edwards, B H, and Griffin, F J (eds.), Uptown Conversation: The New Jazz Studies (Columbia University Press 2004) 256–78.Google Scholar

Von Lewinski, S, International Copyright Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Voorhoof, D, ‘Freedom of Expression and the Right to Information: Implications for Copyright’ in Geiger, C (ed.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar, 2015) ch. 17, 331–53.Google Scholar

Wadlow, C, The Law of Passing Off: Unfair Competition by Misrepresentation (5th ed., Sweet & Maxwell 2016).Google Scholar

Walsh, V, ‘Real Imagination in Technical Imagination’ in Gale, M and Stephens, C (eds.), Francis Bacon (Tate Publishing 2008).Google Scholar

Walter, M M and Von Lewinski, S, European Copyright Law: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Weber, B, ‘Cool Head, Hot Images’ in Knapp, L (ed.), Brian De Palma – Interviews (University Press of Mississippi 2003).Google Scholar

Wendell Holmes, Jr O, The Common Law (Little, Brown 1881).Google Scholar

Williams, J, Rhymin’ and Stealin’ (University of Michigan Press 2013).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein L, , Philosophical Investigations (4th revised ed., Wiley-Blackwell 2009).Google Scholar

Worby, R, ‘Foreword’, in Siôn, P Ap, The Music of Michael Nyman: Texts, Contexts and Intertexts (Ashgate 2007).Google Scholar

Xalabarder, R, ‘On-line Teaching and Copyright: Any Hopes for an EU Harmonized Playground?’ in Torremans, P (ed.), Copyright Law: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward Elgar 2007) ch. 15, 373–401.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, S, ‘A Few Good Buildings: Reading the Obituaries of Philip Johnson’ (2005) 74 (2) The American Scholar 117.Google Scholar

Adeney, E, ‘Appropriation in the Name of Art: Is a Quotation Exception the Answer?’ (2013) 23 AIPJ 142.Google Scholar

Ambasz, E, ‘Popular Pantheon’ (December 1984) Architectural Review 35.Google Scholar

Antons, C and Adeney, E, ‘The Germania 3 Decision Translated: The Quotation Exception before the German Constitutional Court’ [2013] EIPR 646.Google Scholar

Ap, Siôn, ‘Hidden Discontinuities and Uncanny Meaning’ (2014) 33(2) Contemporary Music Review 167.Google Scholar

Aprill, E P, ‘The Law of the Word: Dictionary Shopping in the Supreme Court’ (1998) 30 Ariz St L J 275.Google Scholar

Arnold, R, ‘Reflections on the Triumph of Music: Copyrights and Performers’ Rights in Music’ (2009) (20 October) Oxford Intellectual Property Invited Speaker Seminar.Google Scholar

Aronsson-Storrier, A, ‘Copyright Exceptions and Contract in the UK: The Impact of Recent Amendments’ (2016) 6 Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 111.Google Scholar

Austin, G, ‘EU and US Perspectives on Fair Dealing for the Purpose of Parody or Satire’ (2016) 39 UNSW L J 684.Google Scholar

Barthelmess, S, ‘Richard Meier’s Stadthaus Project at Ulm’ (1990) (Spr) 44 (3) Jo Architectural Education 2.Google Scholar

Bate, S and Abramson, L, ‘To Sample or Not to Sample’ [1997] Ent L R 193.Google Scholar

Beaudoin, R, ‘Counterpoint and Quotation in Ussachevsky’s Wireless Fantasy’ (2007) 12(2)Organised Sound 143.Google Scholar

Beebe, B, ‘An Empirical Study of U.S. Copyright Fair Use Opinions, 1978–2005’ (2008) 156 U Pa L Rev 549.Google Scholar

Behrens, R, ‘Review of “Eisenstein: The Master’s House”’ (2004) 37(3) Leonardo 252.Google Scholar

Benoliel, D, ‘Copyright Distributive Justice’ (2007) 10 Yale J L & Tech 45.Google Scholar

Bently, L, ‘Copyright and Quotation in Film and TV’ CREATe Working Paper (June 2020).Google Scholar

Bently, L and Sherman, B, ‘Great Britain and the Signing of the Berne Convention in 1886’ (2001) 48 Jo Copyright Soc’y USA 311.Google Scholar

Bergström, S, ‘Current Problems Concerning Broadcasting in the International Field’ (1958) 51 EBU Review (B) 21–6; (1959) 25 RIDA 120.Google Scholar

Bergström, S, ‘Kommitté I. Revisionen av Bernkonventionen’ (1968) 37 NIR 7.Google Scholar

Bergström, S, ‘Report of the Work of the Main Committee I’ [1967] Copyright 183.Google Scholar

Bicknell, J, ‘The Problem of Reference in Musical Quotation: A Phenomenological Approach’ (2001) 59 Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 185.Google Scholar

Bodelsen, M, ‘Gauguin’s Cézannes’ (1962) 104 Burlington Magazine 204.Google Scholar

Bohannan, C, ‘Copyright Harm, Foreseeability, and Fair Use’ (2007) 85 Washington University L Rev 969.Google Scholar

Bracha, O and Syed, T, ‘Beyond Efficiency: Consequence-Sensitive Theories of Copyright’ (2014) 29 Berkeley Tech L J 229.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, D, ‘Fair Dealing and the Clockwork Orange Case: “A Thieves’ Charter”?’ [1994] 5 Ent L R 6.Google Scholar

Brennan, D, ‘The Three Step Test Frenzy – Why the TRIPS Panel Decision Might Be Considered Per Incuriam’ [2002] IPQ 212.Google Scholar

Brudney, J and Baum, L, ‘Oasis or Mirage: The Supreme Court’s Thirst for Dictionaries in the Rehnquist and Roberts Eras’ (2013) 55 William & Mary L R 483.Google Scholar

Bruno, G, ‘Ramble City: Postmodernism and Bladerunner’ (1987) 41 October 61.Google Scholar

Burkholder, J P, ‘The Uses of Existing Music: Musical Borrowing as a Field’ (1994) 50 Notes 851.Google Scholar

Burrell, R, ‘Reining in Copyright Law: Is Fair Use the Answer?’ [2001] IPQ 361.Google Scholar

Cabay, J and Lambrecht, M, ‘Remix Prohibited: How Rigid EU Copyright Laws Inhibit Creativity’ (2015) 10 (5) Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 359.Google Scholar

Cameron, C J, ‘Reinvigorating U.S. Copyright with Attribution: How Courts Can Help Define the Fair Use Exception to Copyright by Considering the Economic Aspects of Attribution’ (2013) 2 Berkeley J Ent & Sports L 130.Google Scholar

Capdevila-Werning, R, ‘Can Buildings Quote?’ (2011) 69 Jo Aesthetics and Art Criticism 115.Google Scholar

Carrier, D, ‘Manet and His Interpreters’ (1985) 8(3) Art History 320.Google Scholar

Carter, S L, ‘Custom, Adjudication and Petrushevsky’s Watch: Some Notes from the Intellectual Property Front’ (1992) 78 Va L Rev 129.Google Scholar

Casteels, M, ‘Works of Art and the Right of Quotation’ (1954) 11 RIDA 81.Google Scholar

Chon, M, ‘Intellectual Property “from Below”: Copyright and Capability for Education’ (2007) 40 UC Davis L Rev 803.Google Scholar

Chon, M, ‘Intellectual Property and the Development Divide’ (2006) Cardozo Law Review 2821.Google Scholar

Chon, M, ‘Intellectual Property Equality’ (2010) 9 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 259.Google Scholar

Christie, A F and Wright, R, ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Three-Step Tests in International Treaties’ (2014) 45(4) IIC 409.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J, ‘Straight Human Rights Talk – Why Proportionality Does (Not) Matter’ (2010) 55 Scandinavian Stud L 11.Google Scholar

Cianciardo, J, ‘The Principle of Proportionality: The Challenges of Human Rights’ (2010) 3 J Civ L Stud 177.Google Scholar

Ciolino, D S, ‘Rethinking the Compatability of Moral Rights and Fair Use’ (1997) 54 Wash & Lee L Rev 33.Google Scholar

Clay, J, ‘Ointments, Makeup, Pollen’ (trans. John Shepley) (1983) 27 October 4–5.Google Scholar

Cohen, J E, ‘Copyright and the Perfect Curve’ (2000) 53 Vand L Rev 1799.Google Scholar

Condren, C, Davis, J M, McCausland, S and Phiddian, R, ‘Defining Parody and Satire: Australian Copyright Law and Its New Exception: Part 2 – Advancing Ordinary Definitions’ (2008) 13 MALR 401.Google Scholar

Cook, T, ‘The Proposal for a Directive on the Protection of Trade Secrets in EU Legislation’ (2014) 19 Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 54.Google Scholar

Cooter, R C, ‘Three Effects of Social Norms on Law: Expression, Deterrence and Internationalisation’ (2000) 79 Oregon L Rev 1.Google Scholar

Cornu, M and Mallet-Poujol, N, ‘Le droit de Citation Audiovisuelle: Légitimer la Culture par L’image’ [1998] Legicom 119.Google Scholar

Crews, K D, ‘The Law of Fair Use and the Illusion of Fair Use Guidelines’ (2001) 62 Ohio St L J 599.Google Scholar

Crinson, M, ‘Melnikov in Leicester – A Mythology’ (2013) 4 Leuchtturmprojekte 48.Google Scholar

Cunningham, C D, Levi, J N, Green, G M, Kaplan, J P, ‘Plain Meaning and Hard Cases’ (1993) 103 Yale L J 1561.Google Scholar

Dal, Co F, ‘The Melancholy Experience of Contemporaneity’ (1993) 2 (September/October) ANY (Architecture New York) 26.Google Scholar

Damme, I V, ‘On Good Faith Use of Dictionary in the Search of Ordinary Meaning under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – A Reply to Professor Chang-Fa Lo’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 231.Google Scholar

Damstedt, B G, ‘Limiting Lock: A Natural Law Justification for the Fair Use Doctrine’ (2003) 112 Yale L J 1179.Google Scholar

Dean, W, ‘Bizet’s Self-Borrowings’ (1960) 41(3) Music and Letters 238.Google Scholar

Deazley, R, ‘Copyright and Parody: Taking Backward the Gowers Review?’ (2010) 73 MLR 785.Google Scholar

Deazley, R and Mathis, J, ‘Writing about Comics and Copyright’ CREATe Working Paper 2013/9 (December 2013).Google Scholar

Derclaye, E and Favale, M, ‘Copyright and Contract Law: Regulating User Contracts: The State of the Art and a Research Agenda’ (2010) 18 J Intell Prop L 65.Google Scholar

Derclaye, E and Taylor, T, ‘Happy IP: Replacing the Law and Economics Justification for Intellectual Property Rights with a Well-Being Approach’ (2015) EIPR 197.Google Scholar

Derclaye, E and Taylor, T, ‘Happy IP: Aligning Intellectual Property Rights with Well-Being’ (2015) IPQ 1.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, G, ‘A New Copyright Order: Why National Courts Should Create Global Norms’ (2000) 149 U Pa L Rev 469.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, G B, ‘The Development and Incorporation of International Norms in the Formation of Copyright Law’ (2001) 62 Ohio St L J 733.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, G B and Dreyfuss, R C, ‘Designing a Global Intellectual Property System Responsive to Change: The WTO, WIPO and Beyond’ (2009) 46 Houston L Rev 1187.Google Scholar

Dong, H and Gu, M, ‘Copyrightable or Not: A Review of the Chinese Provision on “Illegal Works” Targeted by WTO DS362 and Suggestions on the Legal Reform’ (2009) 4 Asian J WTO & Int’l Health L & Pol’y 335.Google Scholar

Dotan, A, Elkin-Koren, N, Fischman-Afori, O, Haramati-Alpern, R, ‘Fair Use Best Practices for Higher Education Institutions: The Israeli Experience’ (2010) 57 J Copyright Soc’y USA 447.Google Scholar

Dratler, J, ‘Distilling the Witches’ Brew of Fair Use in Copyright Law’ (1988) 43 U Miami L Rev 233.Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, R C and Lowenfeld, A F, ‘Two Achievements of the Uruguay Round: Putting TRIPS and Dispute Settlement Together’ (1997) 37 Va J Int’l L 275.Google Scholar

Duro, P, ‘Quotational Art: Plus Ça Changes: Plus C’est La Meme Chose’ (1991) 14 Art History 294.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F H, ‘Text, History, and Structure in Statutory Interpretation’ (1994) 17 Harv JL & Pub Pol’y 61.Google Scholar

Elkin-Koren, N and Fischman-Afori, O, ‘Rulifying Fair Use’ (2017) 59 Arizona L Rev 161.Google Scholar

Elkin-Koren, N and Fischman-Afori, O, ‘Taking Users’ Rights to the Next Level: A Pragmatist Approach to Fair Use’ (2015) 33 Cardozo Arts & Ent L J 1.Google Scholar

Elkin-Koren, N and Netanel, Neil W, ‘Transplanting Fair Use Across the Globe: A Case Study Testing The Credibility of U.S. Opposition’ (May 11, 2020) Hastings Law Journal, Forthcoming. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3598160.Google Scholar

Ellickson, R C, ‘Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County’ (1986) 38 Stan L Rev 623.Google Scholar

Ellickson, R C, ‘The Evolution of Social Norms: A Perspective from the Legal Academy’ (1999) (1 July) Yale Law School Working Paper No. 230.Google Scholar

Elmahjub, E and Suzor, N, ’Fair Use and Fairness in Copyright: A Distributive Justice Perspective on Users’ Rights’ (2017) 43 Monash U L Rev 274.Google Scholar

Epstein, R A, ‘Some Reflections on Custom in the IP Universe’ (2008) 93 Va L Rev Brief 223.Google Scholar

Erlich, E and Posner, R A, ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking’ (1974) 3 J Legal Stud 257.Google Scholar

Estival, D and Pennycook, A, ‘L’Académie Française and Anglophone Language Ideologies’ (2011) 10 Language Policy 325.Google Scholar

Fabiani, M, ‘Le droit de Reproduction et La revision de la Convention de Berne’ (November 1964) Le Droit D’Auteur 286.Google Scholar

Fauchart, E and Von Hippel, E, ‘Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs’ (2008) 19 (2) Organization Science 187.Google Scholar

Fhima I ‘The Public Interest in European Trade Mark Law’ [2017] IPQ 311.Google Scholar

Field, T, ‘From Custom to Law in Copyright’ (2008) 49 IDEA 125.Google Scholar

Fisher, W W, ‘Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine (1988) 101 Harv L Rev 1659.Google Scholar

Foster, M A, ‘Parody’s Precarious Place: The Need to Legally Recognize Parody as Japan’s Cultural Property’ (2013) 23 Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law 313.Google Scholar

Frampton, K, ‘Leicester University Engineering Laboratory’ (1964) 34(2) Architectural Design 61.Google Scholar

Frampton, K, ‘James Stirling: A Premature Critique’ (1993) 26 AA Files 3.Google Scholar

Frankel, S J and Kellogg, M, ‘Bad Faith and Fair Use’ (2013) 60 J Copyright Soc’y USA 1.Google Scholar

Friedman, B, ‘From Deontology To Dialogue: The Cultural Consequences Of Copyright’ (1995) 13 Cardozo Arts & Ent L J 157.Google Scholar

Garro, A M, ‘Codification Technique and the Problem of Imperative and Suppletive Laws’ (1981) 41 Louisiana L Rev 1007.Google Scholar

Gaubiac, Y, ‘Freedom to Quote from an Intellectual Work’ (1997) 171 RIDA 2.Google Scholar

Gaubiac, Y, ‘La liberte de citer une œvure de l’spirit’, Paris, 1re ch., 10 September 1996, (1997) 171 RIDA 3Google Scholar

Geiger, C, ‘The Three-Step Test, A Threat to a Balanced Copyright Law?’ (2006) 37 IIC 683.Google Scholar

Geiger, C, Gervais, D and Senftleben, M, ‘The Three Step Test Revisited: How to Use the Test’s Flexibility in National Copyright Law’ (2014) 29 Am U Intl L Rev 581.Google Scholar

Geiger, C, Griffiths, J and Hilty, R M, ‘Towards a Balanced Interpretation of the “Three Step Test” in Copyright Law’ (2008) 30(12)EIPR 489.Google Scholar

Geiger, C and Izyumenko, E, ‘The Constitutionalisation of Intellectual Property Law in the EU and the Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online Decisions of the CJEU: Progress, but Still Some Way to Go!’ (2020) 51 IIC 282.Google Scholar

Geller, P, ‘Can the GATT Incorporate Berne Whole?’ (1990) 12 EIPR 423.Google Scholar

Geller, P, ‘Copyright History and Future: What’s Culture Got to Do with It?’ (2000) 47 Jnl Copyright Society of USA 209.Google Scholar

Gerbrandy, S and Klaver, F, ‘La Revision de la Convention de Berne’ (1967) 52 RIDA 5.Google Scholar

Gervais, D J, ‘Making Copyright Whole: A Principled Approach to Copyright Exceptions and Limitations’ (2008) 5 U Ottawa L & Tech J 1.Google Scholar

Gervais, D J, ‘The Compatibility of the Skill and Labour Originality Standard with the Berne Convention and TRIPS Agreement’ [2004] EIPR 75.Google Scholar

Gervais, D J, ‘Towards a New Core International Copyright Norm: The Reverse Three Step Test’ (2005) 9 Marquette Intellectual Property L Rev 1.Google Scholar

Gervais, D J and Derclaye, E, ‘The Scope of Computer Program Protection after SAS: Are We Closer to Answers?’ [2012] EIPR 565.Google Scholar

Ghosh, S, ‘The Merits of Ownership; Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Intellectual Property Review Essay of Lawrence Lessig, The Future of Ideas, and Siva Vaidhyanathan, Copyrights and Copywrongs’ (2002) 15 Harv J L & Tech 453.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘A Tale of Two Copyrights: Literary Property in Revolutionary France and America’ (1990) 64 Tull L Rev 991.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘Achieving Balance in International Copyright Law (Review of Reinbothe J and von Lewinski S, The WIPO Copyright Treaties, 1996)’ (2003) 26 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 201.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘Copyright in the 101st Congress: Commentary on the Visual Artists Rights Act and the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990’ (1990) 14 Colum-VLA J L & Arts 477.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘Copyright without Walls? Speculations on Literary Property in the Library of the Future’ (1993) 42 Representations 53.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘Creation and Commercial Value’ (1990) 90 Columbia L Rev 1805.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘Exclusive Rights, Exceptions, and Uncertain Compliance with International Norms’ (2014) 242 RIDA 175.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘Fair Use For Free, or Permitted-But-Paid?’ (2014) 29 Berkeley Tech L J 1383.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘International Copyright: From a ‘Bundle’ of National Copyright Laws to a Supranational Code?’ (2000) 47 J Copyright Soc’y USA 265.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘The Most Moral of Rights: The Right to Be Recognized as the Author of One’s Work’ (2016) 8 Geo Mason J Int’l Com L 44.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J C, ‘Toward Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and the “Three Step Test” for Copyright Exceptions’ (2001) 187 RIDA 3.Google Scholar

Goodman, N, ‘In Some Questions Concerning Quotation’ (April 1974) 58 (2) The Monist, 294.Google Scholar

Gordon, B, ‘Three Designs by Johnson/Burgee’ (1978) 164 Architectural Record 84.Google Scholar

Gordon, W J, ‘Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors’ (1982) 82 Colum L Rev 1600.Google Scholar

Gordon, W J, ‘Fair Use Markets: On Weighing Potential License Fees’ (2011) 79 Geo Wash L Rev 1814.Google Scholar

Gordon, W J, ‘A Property Right in Self-Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property’ (1993) 102 Yale L J 1533.Google Scholar

Goroff, D B, ‘Fair Use and Unpublished Works: Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises’ (1984) 9 Colum-VLA Art & L 325.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J, ‘Copyright Law after Ashdown: Time to Deal Fairly with the Public’ [2002] IPQ 240.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J, ‘Unsticking the Centre-Piece – The Liberation of European Copyright Law?’ [2010] JIPITEC 87.Google Scholar

Haile, B, ‘Scrutiny of the Ethiopian System of Copyright Limitations in the Light of International Legal Hybrid Resulting from (the Impending) WTO Membership: Three-Step Test in Focus’ (2012) 25 J Ethiopian L 159.Google Scholar

Handler, M and Rolph, D, ‘“A Real Pea Souper”: The Panel Case and the Development of the Fair Dealing Defences to Copyright Infringement in Australia’ [2003] Melbourne University Law Review 15.Google Scholar

Harbo, T-I, ‘The Function of the Proportionality Principles in EU Law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 158.Google Scholar

Hatherley, O, ‘Konstantin Melnikov’s Legacy’ (28 August 2015) Architectural Review.Google Scholar

Hatherley, O, ‘Whose Modernist Icon Is it Anyway?’ (23 April 2010) Building Design 9Google Scholar

He, H, ‘Seeking a Balanced Interpretation of the Three-Step Test – An Adjusted Structure in View of Divergent Approaches’ (2009) 40 IIC 274.Google Scholar

He, J, ‘Developing Countries’ Pursuit of an Intellectual Property Law Balance under the WTO TRIPS Agreement’ (2011) 10 Chinese J Int’l L 827.Google Scholar

Heide, T, ‘Copyright, Contract and the Legal Protection of Technological Measures – Not the Old Fashioned Way: Providing a Rationale to the Copyright Exceptions Interface’ (2002–2003) 50 J Copyright Soc’y USA 315.Google Scholar

Helfer, L R, ‘World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/TRIPS and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act’ (2000) 80 BU L Rev 93.Google Scholar

Hemmungs Wirtén, E, ‘Colonial Copyright, Postcolonial Publics: The Berne Convention and the 1967 Stockholm Diplomatic Conference Revisited’ (2010) 7 (3) SCRIPT-ed 532.Google Scholar

Henry, S E, ‘The First International Challenge to the U.S. Copyright Law: What Does the WTO Analysis of 17 U.S.C. 110(5) Mean to the Future International Harmonization of Copyright Laws under the TRIPS Agreement?’ (2001) Penn State International Law Review 301.Google Scholar

Hepp, F, ‘The International Protection of the Plastic Arts’ [1957] Le Droit D’Auteur 144.Google Scholar

Hesser, T, ‘Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm, 1967: The Official Program for Revising the Substantive Copyright Provisions of the Berne Convention. The Fifth Annual Jean Geiringer Memorial Lecture on International Copyright Law’ (1967) 14 Bull Copyright Soc’y 267.Google Scholar

Hesser, T, ‘Some Questions Concerning the Future Revision of the Berne Convention’ (January 1962) Droit D’Auteur 11.Google Scholar

Hettinger, E C, ‘Justifying Intellectual Property’ (1989) 18 Philosophy and Public Affairs 31.Google Scholar

Holm-Hudson, K, ‘Quotation and Context: Sampling and John Oswald’s Plunderphonics’ (1997) 7 Leonardo Music Journal 17.Google Scholar

Hudson, E, ‘Implementing Fair Use in Copyright Law; Lessons from Australia’ (2013) 25 Intellectual Property Journal 201.Google Scholar

Hudson, E, ‘The Pastiche Exception in Copyright Law: A Case of Mashed-Up Drafting?’ [2017] IPQ 346.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, B and Okediji, R L, ‘Conceiving an International Instrument on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright’ (2008) Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No 2012-43.Google Scholar

Hughes, J, ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’ (1988) 77 Georgetown Law Journal 287.Google Scholar

Hughes, J and Merges, R P, ‘Copyright and Distributive Justice’ (2016) 92 Notre Dame L Rev 513.Google Scholar

Jencks, C, ‘Contextual Counterpoint in Architecture’ (2012) 24 Log 71.Google Scholar

Joo, T W, ‘Remix without Romance’, (2011) 44 Conn L R 415.Google Scholar

Jutte, B J and Maier, H, ‘A Human Right to Sample – Will the CJEU Dance to the BGH-Beat?’ (2017) 12 JIPLP 784.Google Scholar

Kadens, E and Young, E A, ‘How Customary Is Customary International Law?’ (2013) 54 William & Mary L Rev 885.Google Scholar

Kaminski, M E and Yanisky-Ravid, S, ‘The Marrakesh Treaty for Visually Impaired Persons: Why a Treaty was Preferable to Soft Law’ (2014) 75 U Pitt L Rev 255.Google Scholar

Kapczynski, A, ‘The Cost of Price: Why and How to Get beyond Intellectual Property Internalism’ (2012) 59 UCLA L Rev 970.Google Scholar

Kaplow, L, ‘Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke L J 557.Google Scholar

Karlen, P H, ‘What’s Wrong with VARA: A Critique of Federal Moral Rights’ (1992–3) 15 Hastings Comm & Ent L J 905.Google Scholar

Kennedy, M, ‘Blurred Lines: Reading TRIPS with GATT Glasses’ (2015) 49 Journal of World Trade 735.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R, ‘Was it Author’s Rights All the Time?: Copyright as a Constitutional Right in Ireland’ (2011) 33 DULJ 253.Google Scholar

King, E, ‘“Small Scale Copyrights?” Quotation Marks in Theory and Practice’ (March 2004) 98 (1) The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 39.Google Scholar

Kirchmeier, J L and Thumma, S A, ‘Scaling the Lexicon Fortress: The United States Supreme Court’s Use of Dictionaries in the Twenty-First Century’ (2010) 94 Marq L R 77.Google Scholar

Knapp, J C, ‘Laugh, and the Whole World … Scowls at You: A Defense of the United States’ Fair Use Exception for Parody under TRIPs’ (2005) 33 Denv J Int’l L & Pol’y.Google Scholar

Koelman, K J, ‘Fixing the Three Step Test’ (2006) 28(8) EIPR 407.Google Scholar

Koh, H, ‘Bringing International Law Home’ (1998) 35 Houston L Rev 623.Google Scholar

Korobkin, R B, ‘Behavioral Analysis and Legal Form: Rules vs Standards Revisited’ (2000) 79 Or L Rev 23.Google Scholar

Kuenzli, K M, ‘Aesthetics and Cultural Politics in the Age of Dreyfus: Maurice Denis’s Homage to Cézanne’ (2007) 30 Art History 683.Google Scholar

Kur, A, ‘Of Oceans, Islands, and Inland Water – How Much Room for Exceptions and Limitations under the Three Step Test?’ (2009) 8 Rich J Global L & Bus 287.Google Scholar

Lacey, L J, ‘Of Bread and Roses and Copyright’ [1989] Duke L J 1532.Google Scholar

Landau, M, ‘Fitting United States Copyright Law into the International Scheme: Foreign and Domestic Challenges to Recent Legislation’ (2007) 23 Ga St U L Rev 847.Google Scholar

Landes, W and Posner, R, ‘An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law’ (1989) 18 J Legal Studies 325.Google Scholar

Leaffer, M, ‘The Uncertain Future of Fair Use in a Global Information Marketplace’ (2001) 62 Ohio State Law Journal 849.Google Scholar

Lee, E, ‘Fair Use Avoidance in Music Cases’ (2018) 59 Boston College L Rev 1873.Google Scholar

Lee, E and Moshirnia, A, ‘Does Fair Use Matter? An Empirical Study of Music Cases’ (2020) 94 S Cal L Rev (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Leistner, M, ‘The German Federal Supreme Court’s Judgment on Google’s Image Search – A Topical Example of the ‘Limitations’ of the European Approach to Exceptions and Limitations’ (2011) 42 IIC 417.Google Scholar

‘Les Emprunts Licite’ [1924] Le Droit D’Auteur 87.Google Scholar

Leval, P, ‘Toward a Fair Use Standard’(1990) 103 Harvard L Rev 1105.Google Scholar

Litman, J, ‘Lawful Personal Use’ (2007) 85 Texas L Review 1871.Google Scholar

Lo, C-F, ‘Good Faith Use of Dictionary in the Search of Ordinary Meaning under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding’ (2010) 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 431.Google Scholar

López, J M, ‘Derecho de Autor, Revistas de Prensa y Press Clipping’ (2008) 215 RIDA 2.Google Scholar

Lucas, L, ‘For a Reasonable Interpretation of the Three-Step Test’ (2010) 32(6) EIPR 277.Google Scholar

Liu, D, ‘Copyright and the Pursuit of Justice: A Rawlsian Analysis’ (2012) 32 Legal Studies 600.Google Scholar

Liu, J, ‘An Empirical Study of Transformative Use in Copyright Law’ (2019) 22 Stan Tech L Rev 163.Google Scholar

Jr Lunney, G S, ‘A Tale of Two Copyrights’ (February 26, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3544757.Google Scholar

MacLeod, M, ‘Architecture and Practice in the Reagan Era’ (February 1989) 8 Assemblage 22.Google Scholar

Madison, M J, ‘A Pattern-Oriented Approach to Fair Use’ (2004) 45 William & Mary L Rev 1525.Google Scholar

Masouyé, C, ‘Perspectives de revision de la Convention de Berne’ (1964) 43 RIDA 5.Google Scholar

Masouyé, C, ‘The Next Stockholm Conference’ (1962) 34 RIDA 2.Google Scholar

McAdams, R H, ‘The Origin, Development and Regulation of Norms’ (1998) 96 Mich L R 338.Google Scholar

McCausland, S, ‘Protecting “A Fine Tradition of Satire”: The New Fair Dealing Exception for Parody or Satire in the Australian Copyright Act’ [2007] EIPR 287.Google Scholar

McCutcheon, J, ‘The New Defence of Parody or Satire under Australian Copyright Law’ (2008) IPQ 163.Google Scholar

McGowan, D F, ‘A Critical Analysis of Commercial Speech’ (1990) 78 Cal L Rev 359.Google Scholar

Mee, B, ‘Laughing Matters: Parody and Satire in Australian Copyright Law’ (2009/10) 20 Journal of Law, Information and Science 61.Google Scholar

Melville, R, ‘Francis Bacon’ (December 1949–January 1950) 20 (120–1) Horizon 419.Google Scholar

Munro, C R, ‘The Value of Commercial Speech’ (2003) 62 Cambridge Law Journal 134.Google Scholar

Nesbet, A, ‘Inanimations: Snow White and Ivan the Terrible’ (1997) 50(4) Film Quarterly 20.Google Scholar

Netanel, N W, ‘Making Sense of Fair Use’ (2011) 15 Lewis & Clark L Rev 715.Google Scholar

Netanel, N, ‘The Next Round: The Impact of the WIPO Copyright Treaty on TRIPS Dispute Settlement’ (1997) 37 Va J Intl L 441.Google Scholar

Ng, A, ‘Copyright and Moral Norms’ (2012–2013) 14 Loy J Pub Int L 57.Google Scholar

Okediji, R L, ‘The Limits of International Copyright Exceptions for Developing Countries’ (2019) 21 Vand J Ent & Tech L 689.Google Scholar

Okediji, R L, ‘Towards an International Fair Use Doctrine’ (2000) 39 Colum J Transnat’l L 75.Google Scholar

Oliar, D and Sprigman, C, ‘There’s no Free Laugh (Anymore): The Emergence of Intellectual Property Norms and the Transformation of Stand-Up Comedy’ (2009) 94(8) Virginia L Rev 1787.Google Scholar

Oliver, J, ‘Copyright in the WTO: The Panel Decision on the Three-Step Test’ (2002) 25 Colum J L & Arts 119.Google Scholar

Olwan, R, ‘The Adoption of the American Fair Use in Gulf States: A Comparative Analysis of Authors’ Exceptions in Common Law and Civil Law Countries’ (2016) 38 EIPR 416.Google Scholar

Olwan, R, ‘The Ratification and Implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty for Visually Impaired Persons in the Arab Gulf States’ (2017) 20 J World Intell Prop 178.Google Scholar

Parish, J, ‘Sampling and Copyright – Did the CJEU Make the Right Noises?’ [2020] 79 Cambridge Law Journal 31.Google Scholar

Parkin, J, ‘The Copyright Quotation Exception: Not Fair Use by Another Name’ (2019) 19 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 55.Google Scholar

Pavot, D, ‘The Use of Dictionary by the WTO Appellate Body: Beyond the Search of Ordinary Meaning’ (2010) 4(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 29.Google Scholar

Pessach, G, ‘Beyond IP – The Cost of Free’ (2016) 54 Osgoode Hall L Rev 225.Google Scholar

Posner, E A, ‘Standards, Rules, and Social Norms’ (1997) 21 Harv J L Public Pol’y 101.Google Scholar

Post, R C, ‘The Constitutional Status of Commercial Speech’ (2000) 48 UCLA L Rev 1.Google Scholar

Radin, M J, ‘Property and Personhood’ (1982) 34 Stanford L Rev 957.Google Scholar

Randall, M H, ‘Commercial Speech under the European Convention on Human Rights: Subordinate or Equal?’ (2006) 6 Human Rights L Rev 53.Google Scholar

Randolph, A R, ‘Dictionaries, Plain Meaning, and Context in Statutory Interpretation’ (1994) 17 Harv J L & Pub Poly 71.Google Scholar

Recht, P, ‘Pseudo-Quotation in the Field of the Plastic and Figurative Arts’ (1957) 17 RIDA 84.Google Scholar

Recht, P, ‘Should the Berne Convention include a Definition of the Right of Reproduction?’ [April 1965] Copyright 82.Google Scholar

Reese, R A ‘Innocent Infringement in U.S. Copyright Law: A History’ (2007) 30 Colum Journal of Law and the Arts 133.Google Scholar

Reese-Lawrence, A ‘The Return of the Dead: Stirling’s Self-Revision at Roma Interotta’ (2011) 22 Log 22.Google Scholar

Reichman, J H, ‘Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement’ (1995) 29 Int’l Law 345.Google Scholar

Richman, B D, ‘Norms and Law: Putting the Horse Before the Cart’ (2012) 62 Duke L J 739.Google Scholar

Ricketson, S, ‘The Boundaries of Copyright: Its Proper Limitations and Exceptions: International Conventions and Treaties’ [1999] IPQ 56.Google Scholar

Riis, T and Schovsbo, J, ‘Extended Collective Licences and the Nordic Experience’ (2010) 33 Col Jo L & Arts 471.Google Scholar

Rognstad, O, ‘Restructuring the Economic Rights in Copyright – Some Reflections on an Alternative Model’ (2015) 62 J Copyright Soc’y USA 503.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, E L, ‘A Theory of IP’s Negative Space’ (2011) Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 317.Google Scholar

Rosenfield, H N, ‘Customary Use as “Fair Use” in Copyright Law’ (1975) 25 Buff L Rev 119.Google Scholar

Rothman, J E, ‘Best Intentions: Reconsidering Best Practices Statements in the Context of Fair Use and Copyright Law’ (2010) 57 J Copyright Soc’y USA 371.Google Scholar

Rothman, J E, ‘Custom, Comedy and the Value of Dissent’ (2009) 95 Va L Rev Brief 19.Google Scholar

Rothman, J E, ‘The Questionable Use of Custom in Intellectual Property’ (2007) 93 Va L Rev 1899.Google Scholar

Rothman, J E, ‘Why Custom Cannot Save Copyright’s Fair Use Defense’ (2007) 93 Va L Rev Brief 243.Google Scholar

Rubin, P A, ‘War of the Words: How Courts Can Use Dictionaries in Accordance with Textualist Principles’ (2010) 60 Duke L J 167.Google Scholar

Sag, M, ‘Predicting Fair Use’ (2012) 73 Ohio St L J 47.Google Scholar

Sag, M, ‘The Prehistory of Fair Use’ (2011) 76 Brooklyn L Rev 1371.Google Scholar

Saka, P, ‘Quotation’ (2013) 8 Philosophy Compass 935.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P, ‘Possible Futures of Fair Use’ (2015) 90 Wash L Rev 815.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P, ‘Symposium: Intellectual Property and Contract Law for the Information Age’ (1999) 87 Cal L Rev 1.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P, ‘The US Digital Agenda at WIPO’ (1997) 37 Virginia Journal of International Law 369.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P, ‘Unbundling Fair Uses’ (2009) 77 Fordham L Rev 2537.Google Scholar

Sandeen, S K ‘Implementing the EU Trade Secrets Directive: A View from the United States’ [2017] EIPR 4.Google Scholar

Sanjek, D, ‘Don’t Have to DJ No More: Sampling and the “Autonomous Creator”’ (1992) 10 Card Arts & Ent L J 607.Google Scholar

Sarid, E, ‘Don‘t Be a Drag, Just Be a Queen – How Drag Queens Protect Their Intellectual Property without Law’ (2014) 10 FIU L Rev 133.Google Scholar

Schauer, F, ‘Is Law a Technical Language?’ (2015) 52 San Diego L Rev 501.Google Scholar

Schauer, F, ‘Statutory Construction and the Coordinating Function of Plain Meaning’ [1990] Sup Ct Rev 231.Google Scholar

Schlag, P, ‘Rules and Standards’ (1985) 33 UCLA L Rev 379.Google Scholar

Scoville, R M, ‘Finding Customary International Law’ (2016) 101 Iowa L Rev 1893.Google Scholar

Senftleben, M, ‘Internet Search Results – A Permissible Quotation?’ (2013) 235 RIDA 3.Google Scholar

Senftleben, M, ‘The International Three-Step Test: A Model Provision for EC Fair Use Legislation’ (2010) 1 JIPITEC 67.Google Scholar

Shaver, L, ‘Copyright and Inequality’ (2014) 92 Washington University L Rev 117.Google Scholar

Simon, I, ‘Nominative Use and Honest Practices in Industrial and Commercial Matters – A Very European History’ [2007] IPQ 117.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, R, ‘Quotation’ (1984) 37(4) The Review of Metaphysics 699.Google Scholar

Special Issue, (2014) 33(2) Contemporary Music Review on Music Borrowing and Quotation.Google Scholar

Strauss, S, ‘Why Plain Meaning?’ (1997) 72 Notre Dame L Rev 1565.Google Scholar

Strömholm, S, ‘Droit Moral – The International and Comparative Scene from a Scandinavian Viewpoint’ (1983) 14 IIC 1.Google Scholar

Strömholm, S, ‘Svante Bergström’ [1981] SvJT 398.Google Scholar

Stuart, R, ‘A Work of Heart: A Proposal for a Revision of the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 to Bring the United States Closer to International Standards’ (2007) 47 Santa Clara L Rev 645.Google Scholar

Subotnik, E E, ‘Intent in Fair Use’ (2014) 18 Lewis and Clark L Rev 935.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C R, ‘Social Norms and Social Roles’ (1996) 96 Colum L Rev 903.Google Scholar

Suzor, N, ‘Where the Bloody Hell Does Parody Fit in Australian Copyright Law?’ (2008) 13 MALR 218.Google Scholar

Tan, D, ‘The Transformative Use Doctrine and Fair Dealing in Singapore’ (2012) 24 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 832.Google Scholar

Thumma, S A and Kirchmeier, J L, ‘The Lexicon Has Become a Fortress: The United States Supreme Court’s Use of Dictionaries’ (1999) 47 Buff L R 227.Google Scholar

Tournier, A, ‘Le Comité d’experts de Genève’ (1964) 42 RIDA 27.Google Scholar

Tsakyrakis, S, ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’ (2009) 7 Int’l J Const L 468.Google Scholar

Van Houweling, M S, ‘Distributive Values in Copyright’ (2005) 83 Texas L Rev 1535.Google Scholar

Vaunois, A, ‘Letter de France’ (March 1925) Le Droit D’Auteur 29.Google Scholar

Vaver, D, ‘The National Treatment Requirements of the Berne and Universal Copyright Conventions’ (1986) 17 IIC 577.Google Scholar

Visser, C, ‘The Location of the Parody Defence in Copyright Law: Some Comparative Perspectives’ (2005) 38 Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 321.Google Scholar

Wadlow, C, ‘Regulatory Data Protection under TRIPs Article 39 (3)and Article 10bis of the Paris Convention: Is There a Doctor in the House?’ (2008) IPQ 355.Google Scholar

Wauwermans, P, ‘Lettre de Belgique’, (June 1895) Le Droit D’Auteur 75.Google Scholar

Weinreb, L L, ‘Fair’s Fair: A Comment on the Fair Use Doctrine’ (1990) 103 Harv L Rev 1137.Google Scholar

Weinreb, L L, ‘Fair Use’ (1999) 67 Fordham L Rev 1291.Google Scholar

Wennakoski, A A, ‘Trade Secrets under Review: A Comparative Analysis of the Protection of Trade Secrets in the EU and in the US’ [2016] EIPR 154.Google Scholar

Williams, J, ‘Theoretical Approaches to Quotation in Hip-Hop Recordings’ (2014) 33(2) Contemporary Music Review 188.Google Scholar

Wilmington, M, ‘The Rain People’ (January–February 1992) 28 (1) Film Comment 17.Google Scholar

Wolf, S, ‘Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act’ (2012–13) 15 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 439.Google Scholar

Wong, M W S, ‘Transformative User-Generated Content in Copyright Law: Infringing Derivative Works or Fair Use’ (2009) 11 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 1075.Google Scholar

Xalabarder, R, ‘Press Publisher Rights in the New Copyright in the Digital Single Market Draft Directive’, CREATe Working Paper 2016/15 (December 2016).Google Scholar

Xalabarder, R, ‘The Remunerated Statutory Limitation for News Aggregation and Search Engines Proposed by the Spanish Government; Its Compliance with International and EU Law’ (30 September 2014) IN3 Working Paper Series. http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/xalabarder.pdf.Google Scholar

Yanisky-Ravid, S, ‘The Hidden Though Flourishing Justification of Intellectual Property Laws: Distributive Justice, National Versus International Approaches’ (2017) 21 Lewis & Clark L Rev 1.Google Scholar

Yap, P-J, ‘Honestly, Neither Celine nor Gillette Is Defensible!’ [2008] EIPR 286.Google Scholar

Yen, A C, ‘Restoring the Natural law: Copyright as Labor and Possession’ (1990) 51 Ohio State L J 517.Google Scholar

Yu, P K, ‘Customizing Fair Use Transplants’ (2018) 7 Laws 1.Google Scholar

Yu, P K, ‘Fair Use and its Global Paradigm Evolution’ (2019) 2019 U Ill L Rev 111.Google Scholar

Zervigón’, A, ‘Remaking Bacon’ (1995) 54(2) Art Journal 87.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, C, ‘Stirling Reassembled’ (2007) 56 AA Files 30.Google Scholar

Zissu, R L, ‘Fair Use: From Harper & Row to Acuff Rose, May 13, 1994’ (1994) 42 J Copyright Soc’y USA 7.Google Scholar

Campbell, R, ‘Architect James Stirling: Controversial, Daring, Amazing’ The Boston Globe (Boston, 30 June 1992).Google Scholar

Cork, R, ‘A Master of Mind and Matter’ The Times (10 October 1995) 34.Google Scholar

Goldberger, P, ‘Philip Johnson Is Dead at 98: Architecture’s Restless Intellect’ New York Times (New York, 27 January 2005).Google Scholar

Huxtable, A L, ‘Architecture: Bigger – And May Be Better: The Outlook in Architecture’ New York Times (New York, 26 August 1978) 83.Google Scholar

Huxtable, A L, ‘Architecture View: “Towering” Achievements of ’78’ New York Times(New York, 31 December 1978) D21.Google Scholar

Huxtable, A L, ‘Johnson’s Latest – Clever Tricks or True Art?’ New York Times (New York, 16 April 1978) 26.Google Scholar

Huxtable, A L, ‘The Troubled State of Architecture’ New York Review of Books (1 May 1980) 22.Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission, Copyright and the Digital Economy (Report No. 122) (Sydney, ALRC, 2013).Google Scholar

Attorney-General’s Department, Issues Paper, Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: An Examination of Fair Use, Fair Dealing and Other Exceptions in the Digital Age (May 2005).Google Scholar

Board of Trade, Report of the Copyright Committee (1951–2) (Cmd. 8662).Google Scholar

Bodenhausen, G H C, Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, WIPO Publication No. 611 (1969).Google Scholar

Ficsor, M, Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO (WIPO 2003).Google Scholar

Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (UK, December 2006).Google Scholar

Taking Forward the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property: Proposed Changes to Copyright Exceptions (Intellectual Property Office Newport 2008).Google Scholar

Taking Forward the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property: Second Stage Consultation Copyright Exceptions (Intellectual Property Office Newport 2009).Google Scholar

Hargreaves Review, Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth (May 2011).Google Scholar

Masouyé, C, Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (WIPO 1978).Google Scholar

Okpaluba, J, ‘Digitisation, Culture and Copyright Law: Digital Sampling, A Case Study’ (PhD thesis, King’s College London, 2000).Google Scholar

Ricketson, S, WIPO Study on Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment (2003) SCCR 9/7.Google Scholar

Westkamp, G, The Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC in the Member States, Part II (2007).Google Scholar

WIPO, Guide to the Berne Convention (1978).Google Scholar

WIPO, Records of the Diplomatic Conference on Certain Copyright and Neighboring Rights Questions, Geneva 1996, vol. 1 (WIPO 1999).Google Scholar

WIPO, Records of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm, June 11 to July 14, 1967, vol. I and vol. II (WIPO 1971).Google Scholar

WIPO, Implications of the TRIPs Agreement for Treaties Implemented by WIPO (WIPO 1996).Google Scholar

Xalabarder, R, Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Educational Activities in North America, Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia and Israel (WIPO, 5 November 2009), SCCR/19/8.Google Scholar