Book contents
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface An Overview of Good Language Teachers
- Part I Macro Perspectives
- Part II Classroom Perspectives
- Part III Instructional Perspectives
- 15 Pragmatics and Good Language Teachers
- 16 Vocabulary and Good Language Teachers
- 17 Grammar and Good Language Teachers
- 18 Pronunciation and Good Language Teachers
- 19 Listening and Good Language Teachers
- 20 Speaking and Good Language Teachers
- 21 Reading and Good Language Teachers
- 22 Writing and Good Language Teachers
- Good Language Teachers: Past, Present, and Future Directions
- Epilogue Good Language Teachers – What Do They Do? What Do They Know?
- Index
- References
17 - Grammar and Good Language Teachers
from Part III - Instructional Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2020
Book contents
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface An Overview of Good Language Teachers
- Part I Macro Perspectives
- Part II Classroom Perspectives
- Part III Instructional Perspectives
- 15 Pragmatics and Good Language Teachers
- 16 Vocabulary and Good Language Teachers
- 17 Grammar and Good Language Teachers
- 18 Pronunciation and Good Language Teachers
- 19 Listening and Good Language Teachers
- 20 Speaking and Good Language Teachers
- 21 Reading and Good Language Teachers
- 22 Writing and Good Language Teachers
- Good Language Teachers: Past, Present, and Future Directions
- Epilogue Good Language Teachers – What Do They Do? What Do They Know?
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 17 describes effective grammar instruction and examines the instructional practices of six teachers involved in grammar courses. The results indicate that teachers have at their disposal a number of instructional options and the effectiveness of these options is mediated by individual, linguistic, and contextual variables.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers , pp. 219 - 231Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Bade, M. (2008). Grammar and good language learners. In Griffiths, C. (Ed.). Lessons from good language learners (pp. 174–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2010). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In Long, M. & Doughty, C. (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119–138). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2007). The associative-cognitive CREED. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R. M., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E. (Ed.). (2016). Teaching grammar to speakers of other languages. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Toronto: Thomson and Heinle.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Teaching and testing grammar. In Long, M. & Doughty, C. (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 518–542). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48(2), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2) (pp. 577–592). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017). Grammar acquisition. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 205–223). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2010). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (2020). Corrective feedback and good language teachers. In Griffiths, C. & Tajeddin, Z. (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 151–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2006). The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Poznań, Poland: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Google Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2013). Principles of instructed language learning revisited: Guidelines for effective grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. In Droździał-Szelest, K. & Pawlak, M. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching: Studies in honor of Waldemar Marton (pp. 199–220). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2014). Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2016). The role of autonomy in learning and teaching foreign language grammar. In Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (Eds.), Autonomy in second language learning: Managing the resources (pp. 3–19). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2017). Individual difference variables as mediating influences on success or failure in form-focused instruction. In Piechurska-Kuciel, E., Szymańska-Czaplak, E., & Szyszka, M. (Eds.), At the crossroads: Challenges of foreign language learning (pp. 75–92). Heidelberg: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2020). Individual differences and good language teachers. In Griffiths, C. & Tajeddin, Z. (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 121–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2017). Processing instruction. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 166–180). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5
- Cited by