Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:23:13.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Molly M. Zahn
Molly M. Zahn
Affiliation:
University of Kansas, Lawrence
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism
Scribal Composition and Transmission
 , pp. 233 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Samuel L. “The Social Location of the Scribe in the Second Temple Period.” In Sibyls, Scriptures, and Scrolls: John Collins at Seventy. Vol. 1, edited by Baden, Joel, Najman, Hindy, and Tigchelaar, Eibert. JSJSup 175/1, 22–37. Leiden: Brill, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aejmelaeus, Anneli. “What Can We Know about the Hebrew Vorlage of the Septuagint?” In On the Trail of the Septuagint Translators: Collected Essays. 2nd ed. CBET 50, 71–106. Leiden: Peeters, 2007.Google Scholar
Alexander, Elizabeth Shanks. “The Orality of Rabbinic Writing.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Talmud and Rabbinic Literature, edited by Fonrobert, Charlotte Elisheva and Jaffee, Martin S., 38–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Jewish Aramaic Translations of Hebrew Scriptures.” In Mikra: Text, Translation, Reading and Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity, edited by Mulder, Martin Jan. CRINT 2.1, 217–53. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum; Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Retelling the Old Testament.” In It Is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture, edited by Carson, D. and Williamson, H. G. M., 99–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “The Redaction-History of Serekh Ha-Yaḥad: A Proposal.” RevQ 17 (1996): 437–56.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Rabbinic Paratexts: The Case of Midrash Lamentations Rabbah.” In In the Second Degree: Paratextual Literature in Ancient Near Eastern and Ancient Mediterranean Culture and Its Reflections in Medieval Literature, edited by Alexander, Philip, Lange, Armin, and Pillinger, Renate, 183–203. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Textual Authority and the Problem of the Biblical Canon.” In Is There a Text in This Cave? Studies in the Textuality of the Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of George J. Brooke, edited by Feldman, Ariel, Cioată, Maria, and Hempel, Charlotte. STDJ 119, 42–68. Leiden: Brill, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Philip, and Vermes, Geza. Qumran Cave 4.XIX: 4QSerekh Ha-Yaḥad. DJD 26. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.Google Scholar
Bar-On (Gesundheit), Shimon. “The Festival Calendars in Exodus xxiii 14–19 and xxxiv 18–26.” VT 48 (1998): 161–95.Google Scholar
Baynes, Leslie. “Enoch and Jubilees in the Canon of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church.” In A Teacher for All Generations: Essays in Honor of James C. VanderKam. Vol. 2, edited by Mason, Eric F., Bautch, Kelley Coblentz, Harkins, Angela Kim, and Machiela, Daniel A.. JSJSup 153, 799–818. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Beebee, Thomas O. The Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability. University Park: Penn State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beentjes, Pancratius C. The Book of Ben Sira in Hebrew. VTSup 68. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Beit-Arié, Malachi. “Publication and Reproduction of Literary Texts in Medieval Jewish Civilization: Jewish Scribality and Its Impact on the Texts Transmitted.” In Transmitting Jewish Traditions: Orality, Textuality, and Cultural Diffusion, edited by Elman, Yaakov and Gershoni, Israel, 225–47. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ben-Amos, Dan. “Analytical Categories and Ethnic Genres.” Genre 2 (1969): 275–301.Google Scholar
Ben-Dov, Jonathan. “319. 4QOtot.” In Qumran Cave 4.XVI: Calendrical Texts, edited by Talmon, Shemaryahu, Ben-Dov, Jonathan, and Glessmer, Uwe. DJD 21, 195–244. Oxford: Clarendon, 2001.Google Scholar
Ben-Dov, Jonathan. “Early Texts of the Torah: Revisiting the Greek Scholarly Context.” JAJ 4 (2013): 210–34.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Rocco. “A Literary Analysis of the Genesis Apocryphon.” Aramaic Studies 9 (2011): 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Moshe J. “The Aramaic Targumim: The Many Faces of the Jewish Biblical Experience.” In Jewish Ways of Reading the Bible, edited by Brooke, George J.. JSSSup 11, 133–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Moshe J. “Interpretation of Scriptures.” In Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Vol. 1, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H. and VanderKam, James, 376–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Moshe J. “‘Rewritten Bible’: A Generic Category Which Has Outlived Its Usefulness?” Textus 22 (2005): 169–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Moshe J. “What Has Happened to the Laws? The Treatment of Legal Material in 4QReworked Pentateuch.” DSD 15 (2008): 24–49.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Moshe J. “Is the Genesis Apocryphon a Unity? What Sort of Unity Were You Looking for?” Aramaic Studies 8 (2010): 107–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Moshe J. Reading and Re-Reading Scripture at Qumran. Vol 1. STDJ 107. Leiden: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthelot, Katell, et al. La Bibliothèque de Qumrân 1: Torah: Genèse. Paris: Cerf, 2008.Google Scholar
Berthelot, Katell, La Bibliothèque de Qumrân 3A: Torah: Deutéronome et Pentateuque dans son ensemble. Paris: Cerf, 2013.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. “Redaction and Ideology in the ‘Rule of the Community (1QS/4QS).’” RevQ 18 (1998): 541–60.Google Scholar
Boyd-Taylor, Cameron. “Esther’s Great Adventure: Reading the LXX Version of the Book of Esther in Light of Its Assimilation to the Conventions of the Greek Romantic Novel.” BIOSCS 30 (1997): 81–113.Google Scholar
Boyd-Taylor, Cameron. Reading Between the Lines: The Interlinear Paradigm for Septuagint Studies. BTS 8. Leuven: Peeters, 2011.Google Scholar
Brady, Monica. “Biblical Interpretation in the ‘Pseudo-Ezekiel’ Fragments (4Q383–391) from Cave Four.” In Biblical Interpretation at Qumran, edited by Henze, Matthias, 88–109. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Breed, Brennan W. Nomadic Text: A Theory of Biblical Reception History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brettler, Marc Zvi. The Creation of History in Ancient Israel. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Brin, Gershon. “המקרא במגילת המקדש.” Shnaton 4 (1980): 182–225.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. “Rewritten Bible.” In Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Vol. 2, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H. and VanderKam, James C., 777–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. “The Rewritten Law, Prophets and Psalms: Issues for Understanding the Text of the Bible.” In The Bible as Book: The Hebrew Bible and the Judaean Desert Discoveries, edited by Herbert, Edward D. and Tov, Emanuel, 31–40. London: British Library, 2002.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. “Between Authority and Canon: The Significance of Reworking the Bible for Understanding the Canonical Process.” In Reworking the Bible: Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran, edited by Chazon, Esther G., Dimant, Devorah, and Clements, Ruth A.. STDJ 58, 85–104. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. “The Qumran Scrolls and the Demise of the Distinction between Higher and Lower Criticism.” In New Directions in Qumran Studies, edited by Campbell, Jonathan G., Lyons, William John, and Pietersen, Lloyd K.. LSTS 52, 26–42. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. “Genre Theory, Rewritten Bible and Pesher.” DSD 17 (2010): 361–86.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. Reading the Dead Sea Scrolls: Essays in Method. EJL 39. Atlanta: SBL, 2013.Google Scholar
Brooke, George J. “Reading, Searching and Blessing: A Functional Approach to Scriptural Interpretation in the יחד.” In The Temple in Text and Tradition: A Festschrift in Honour of Robert Hayward, edited by McLay, R. Timothy. LSTS 83, 140–56. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Buss, Martin J. “The Idea of Sitz im Leben: History and Critique.” ZAW 90 (1978): 157–70.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jonathan G. “‘Rewritten Bible’ and ‘Parabiblical Texts’: A Terminological and Methodological Critique.” In New Directions in Qumran Studies, edited by Campbell, Jonathan G., Lyons, William John, and Pietersen, Lloyd K.. LSTS 52, 43–68. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jonathan G. “Rewritten Bible: A Terminological Reassessment.” In Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques?, edited by Zsengellér, József. JSJSup 166, 49–81. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Carr, David M. “Method in Determination of Direction of Dependence: An Empirical Test of Criteria Applied to Exodus 34,11–26 and Its Parallels.” In Gottes Volk am Sinai: Untersuchungen zu Ex 32–34 und Dtn 9–10, edited by Köckert, Matthias and Blum, Erhard. Veröffentlichungen der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft für Theologie, 107–40 Gütersloh: Kaiser, 2001.Google Scholar
Carr, David M. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Carr, David M. The Formation of the Hebrew Bible: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Carr, David M. “Orality, Textuality, and Memory: The State of Biblical Studies.” In Contextualizing Israel’s Sacred Writings: Ancient Literacy, Orality, and Literary Production, edited by Schmidt, Brian B.. AIL 22, 161–73. Atlanta: SBL, 2015.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, James H. “Temple Scroll Source or Earlier Edition (4Q524 [4QTb; 4QRT]).” In Temple Scroll and Related Documents, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H., Gross, Andrew D., and Rand, Michael C.. PTSDSSP 7, 247–65. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, James H., with Van Kirk, A. R.. “Temple Scroll Source or Divergent Copy (4Q365a [4QTa?]).” In Temple Scroll and Related Documents, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H., Gross, Andrew D., and Rand, Michael C.. PTSDSSP 7, 235–45. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ralph. “History and Genre.” New Literary History 17 (1986): 203–18.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. Daniel. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. “Epilogue: Genre Analysis and the Dead Sea Scrolls.” DSD 17 (2010): 418–30.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. “Sectarian Communities in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” In Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls, edited by Collins, John J. and Lim, Timothy H., 151–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Collins, John J. “Changing Scripture.” In Changes in Scripture: Rewriting and Interpreting Authoritative Traditions in the Second Temple Period, edited by von Weissenberg, Hanne, Pakkala, Juha, and Marttila, Marko. BZAW 419, 23–45. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar
Cook, Edward M. “The Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in the Targums.” In A Companion to Biblical Interpretation in Early Judaism, edited by Henze, Matthias, 92–117. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sidnie White (= Sidnie Anne White). “365a. 4QTemplea?” In Qumran Cave 4.VIII: Parabiblical Texts, Part 1, edited by Attridge, Harold et al. DJD 13, 319–33. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sidnie White The Temple Scroll and Related Texts. Companion to the Qumran Scrolls 2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sidnie White Rewriting Scripture in Second Temple Times. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sidnie White “4QTemple? (4Q365a) Revisited.” In Prayer and Poetry in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature, edited by Penner, Jeremy et al. STDJ 98, 87–95. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sidnie White Scribes and Scrolls at Qumran. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2019.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank Moore. “The Ammonite Oppression of the Tribes of Gad and Reuben: Missing Verses from 1 Samuel 11 Found in 4QSamuela.” In History, Historiography and Interpretation, edited by Tadmor, H. and Weinfeld, M., 148–58. Jerusalem: Magness, 1983.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagenais, John. The Ethics of Reading in Manuscript Culture: Glossing the Libro De Buen Amor. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Davis, Kipp. The Cave 4 Apocryphon of Jeremiah and the Qumran Jeremianic Traditions: Prophetic Persona and the Construction of Community Identity. STDJ 111. Leiden: Brill, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kipp. “‘There and Back Again’: Reconstruction and Reconciliation of the War Text 4QMilḥamaa.” In The War Scroll, Violence, War and Peace in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature: Essays in Honour of Martin G. Abegg on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, edited by Davis, Kipp, Peters, Dorothy M., Baek, Kyung S., and Flint, Peter W.. STDJ 115, 125–46. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Davis, Kipp. “The Dead Sea Scrolls in Colour: Re-imag(in)ing the Shape and Contents of 4QMa (4Q491).” www.academia.edu/13599207/the_Dead_Sea_Scrolls_in_colour_Re-imag_in_ing_the_shape_and_contents_of_4QM-a_4Q491_.Google Scholar
Debel, Hans. “Greek ‘Variant Literary Editions’ to the Hebrew Bible?” JSJ 41 (2010): 161–90.Google Scholar
Devitt, Amy J. Writing Genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dimant, Devorah. “Use and Interpretation of Mikra in the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha.” In Mikra: Text, Translation, Reading and Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity, edited by Mulder, Martin Jan. CRINT 2.1, 379–419. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum; Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Dimant, Devorah. Qumran Cave 4.XXI: Parabiblical Texts, Part 4: Pseudo-Prophetic Texts. DJD 30. Oxford: Clarendon, 2001.Google Scholar
Dinkler, Michal Beth. “Genre Analysis and Early Christian Martyrdom Narratives: A Proposal.” In Sibyls, Scriptures, and Scrolls: John Collins at Seventy. Vol. 1, edited by Baden, Joel, Najman, Hindy, and Tigchelaar, Eibert. JSJSup 175/1, 314–36. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Thomas. “The Paratext’s the Thing.” Chronicle of Higher Education, Jan 6, 2014. https://chronicle.com/article/The-Paratexts-the-Thing/143761/.Google Scholar
Duhaime, Jean. “Dualistic Reworking in the Scrolls from Qumran.” CBQ 49 (1987): 32–56.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. Mouse or Rat? Translation as Negotiation. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2003.Google Scholar
Elledge, C. D. The Statutes of the King: The Temple Scroll’s Legislation on Kingship (11Q19 LVI 12–LIX 21). Cahiers de la Revue Biblique. Paris: Gabalda, 2004.Google Scholar
Eshel, Esther, and Eshel, Hanan. “Dating the Samaritan Pentateuch’s Compilation in Light of the Qumran Biblical Scrolls.” In Emanuel: Studies in Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honor of Emanuel Tov, edited by Paul, Shalom M., Kraft, Robert A., Schiffman, Lawrence H., and Fields, Weston W., 215–40. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Falk, Daniel K. The Parabiblical Texts: Strategies for Extending the Scriptures in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Companion to the Qumran Scrolls 8. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Fishbane, Michael A. “Revelation and Tradition: Aspects of Inner-Biblical Exegesis.” JBL 99 (1980): 343–61.Google Scholar
Fishbane, Michael A. Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.Google Scholar
Fishbane, Michael A. The Garments of Torah: Essays in Biblical Hermeneutics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Fishelov, David. Metaphors of Genre: The Role of Analogies in Genre Theory. University Park: Penn State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. “Some Observations on the Targum of Job from Qumran Cave 11.” CBQ 36 (1974): 503–24.Google Scholar
Flesher, Paul V. M., and Chilton, Bruce. The Targums: A Critical Introduction. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Folkert, Kendall W. “The ‘Canons’ of ‘Scripture.’” In Rethinking Scripture: Essays from a Comparative Perspective, edited by Levering, Miriam, 170–79. Albany: SUNY Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven D. From Tradition to Commentary: Torah and Its Interpretation in the Midrash Sifre to Deuteronomy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven D. “Rabbinic Views on the Practice of Targum, and Multilingualism in the Jewish Gallilee of the Third–Sixth Centuries.” In The Galilee in Late Antiquity, edited by Levine, Lee I., 253–86. New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1992.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven D. “Locating Targum in the Textual Polysystem of Rabbinic Pedagogy.” BIOSCS 39 (2006): 69–91.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven D. “Rewritten Bible and Rabbinic Midrash as Commentary.” In Current Trends in the Study of Midrash, edited by Bakhos, Carol. JSJSup 106, 59–78. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven D. “Ancient Jewish Law and Narrative in Comparative Perspective: The Damascus Document and the Mishnah.” Diné Israel: Studies in Halakhah and Jewish Law 24 (2007): 65*–99*.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Ida. “Origins of Evil in Genesis and the Apocalyptic Traditions.” In Apocalyptic Thinking in Early Judaism: Engaging with John Collins’ The Apocalyptic Imagination, edited by Crawford, Sidnie White and Wassén, Cecilia. JSJSup 182, 141–59. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Gabbay, Uri. “Akkadian Commentaries from Ancient Mesopotamia and Their Relation to Early Hebrew Exegesis.” DSD 19 (2012): 268–312.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1960.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Florentino. “Multiple Literary Editions of the Temple Scroll?” In The Dead Sea Scrolls: Fifty Years after Their Discovery, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H., Tov, Emanuel, and VanderKam, James C., 364–71. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society/Shrine of the Book, Israel Museum, 2000.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Florentino. “Temple Scroll.” In Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Vol. 2, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H. and VanderKam, James C., 927–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Florentino. “Rethinking the Bible.” In Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, edited by Popović, Mladen. JSJSup 141, 19–36. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Florentino, Tigchelaar, Eibert J. C., and van der Woude, Adam S.. Qumran Cave 11.II: 11Q2–18, 11Q20–30. DJD 23. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Palimpests: Literature in the Second Degree. Translated by Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Gertz, Jan C., Levinson, Bernard M., Rom-Shiloni, Dalit, and Schmid, Konrad, eds. The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America. FAT 111. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar
Ghormley, Justus T. “Inspired Scribes: The Formation of the Book of Jeremiah and the Vocation of Ancient Jewish Scribal Scholars.” PhD diss., University of Notre Dame, 2015.Google Scholar
Goshen-Gottstein, M. H. “The Psalms Scroll (11QPsa): A Problem of Canon and Text.” Textus 5 (1966): 22–33.Google Scholar
Graham, William A. Beyond the Written Word: Oral Aspects of Scripture in the History of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Gross, Andrew D. “Appendix to the Introduction: Problems Noted in Reconstructing 11Q20.” In Temple Scroll and Related Documents, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H., Gross, Andrew D., and Rand, Michael C.. PTSDSSP 7, 179–81. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Grossman, Maxine L. “Community Rule or Community Rules: Examining a Supplementary Approach in Light of the Sectarian Dead Sea Scrolls.” In Empirical Models Challenging Biblical Criticism, edited by Person, Raymond F. Jr. and Rezetko, Robert. AIL 25, 303–30. Atlanta: SBL, 2016.Google Scholar
Gunkel, Hermann. The Psalms: A Form-Critical Introduction. Translated by Horner, Thomas M.. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hanneken, Todd R. “The Status and Interpretation of Jubilees in 4Q390.” In A Teacher for All Generations: Essays in Honor of James C. VanderKam. Vol. 1, edited by Mason, Eric F., Thomas, Samuel I., Schofield, Alison, and Ulrich, Eugene. JSJSup 153, 407–28. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Harkins, Angela Kim. “A New Proposal for Thinking about 1QHa Sixty Years after Its Discovery.” In Qumran Cave 1 Revisited: Texts from Cave 1 Sixty Years after Their Discovery, edited by Falk, Daniel K., Metso, Sarianna, Parry, Donald W., and Tigchelaar, Eibert J. C.. STDJ 91, 101–34. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Harrington, Daniel J. “The Bible Rewritten (Narratives).” In Early Judaism and Its Modern Interpreters, edited by Kraft, Robert A. and Nickelsburg, George W. E., 239–47. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Harrington, Daniel J. Wisdom Texts from Qumran. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Hartog, Pieter B. Pesher and Hypomnema: A Comparison of Two Commentary Traditions from the Hellenistic-Roman Period. STDJ 121. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Hayward, Robert. “Rewritten Bible.” In A Dictionary of Biblical Interpretation, edited by Coggins, R. J. and Houlden, J. L., 595–98. London: SCM, 1990.Google Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. “The Penal Code Reconsidered.” In Legal Texts and Legal Issues, edited by Bernstein, Moshe J., Martínez, Florentino García, and Kampen, John. STDJ 23, 337–48. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. The Damascus Texts. Companion to the Qumran Scrolls 1. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. “The Place of the Book of Jubilees at Qumran and Beyond.” In The Dead Sea Scrolls in Their Historical Context, edited by Lim, Timothy H., 179–96. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000.Google Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. “The Literary Development of the S Tradition: A New Paradigm.” RevQ 22 (2006): 389–401.Google Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. “Sources and Redactions in the Dead Sea Scrolls: The Growth of Ancient Texts.” In Rediscovering the Dead Sea Scrolls: An Assessment of Old and New Approaches and Methods, edited by Grossman, Maxine L., 162–81. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. “Pluralism and Authoritativeness: The Case of the S Tradition.” In Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, edited by Popović, Mladen. JSJSup 141, 193–208. Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. The Qumran Rule Texts in Context. TSAJ 154. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Hempel, Charlotte. “Reflections on Literacy, Textuality, and Community in the Qumran Dead Sea Scrolls.” In Is There a Text in This Cave? Studies in the Textuality of the Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of George J. Brooke, edited by Feldman, Ariel, Cioată, Maria, and Hempel, Charlotte. STDJ 119, 69–82. Leiden: Brill, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendel, Ronald S. The Text of Genesis 1–11: Textual Studies and Critical Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hughes, Julie A. Scriptural Allusions and Exegesis in the Hodayot. STDJ 59. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Jaffee, Martin S. Torah in the Mouth: Writing and Oral Tradition in Palestinian Judaism 200 BCE–400 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Jansen, Laura. The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Japhet, Sara. “The Relationship between the Legal Corpora in the Pentateuch in Light of Manumission Laws.” In Studies in Bible, 1986, edited by Japhet, Sara. ScrHier 31, 63–89. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1986.Google Scholar
Japhet, Sara. The Ideology of the Book of Chronicles and Its Place in Biblical Thought. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1989. Reprint, Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2009.Google Scholar
Jassen, Alex P. Mediating the Divine: Prophecy and Revelation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Second Temple Judaism. STDJ 68. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Jassen, Alex P. “The Pesharim and the Rise of Commentary in Early Jewish Scriptural Interpretation.” DSD 19 (2012): 363–98.Google Scholar
Jassen, Alex P. Scripture and Law in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Translated by Bahti, Timothy. Theory and History of Literature 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Jokiranta, Jutta. “What Is ‘Serekh ha-Yahad (S)’? Thinking about Ancient Manuscripts as Information Processing.” In Sibyls, Scriptures, and Scrolls: John Collins at Seventy. Vol. 1, edited by Baden, Joel, Najman, Hindy, and Tigchelaar, Eibert. JSJSup 175/1, 611–35. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Jokiranta, Jutta, and Vanonen, Hanna. “Multiple Copies of Rule Texts or Multiple Rule Texts? Boundaries of the S and M Documents.” In Crossing Imaginary Boundaries: The Dead Sea Scrolls in the Context of Second Temple Judaism, edited by Pajunen, Mika S. and Tervanotko, Hanna. PFES 108, 11–60. Helsinki: Finnish Exegetical Society, 2015.Google Scholar
Joosten, Jan. Collected Studies on the Septuagint. FAT 83. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Stephen A. “The Temple Scroll and Higher Criticism.” HUCA 53 (1982): 29–43.Google Scholar
Kittel, Bonnie Pedrotti. The Hymns of Qumran: Translation and Commentary. SBLDS 50. Chico: Scholars, 1981.Google Scholar
Klein, Anja. “Resurrection as Reward for the Righteous: The Vision of the Dry Bones in Pseudo-Ezekiel as External Continuation of the Biblical Vision in Ezekiel 37.1–14.” In ‘I Lifted My Eyes and Saw’: Reading Dream and Vision Reports in the Hebrew Bible, edited by Hayes, Elizabeth R. and Tiemeyer, Lena-Sofia, 196–220. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar
Klein, Anja. “Fathers and Sons: Family Ties in the Historical Psalms.” In Functions of Psalms and Prayers in the Late Second Temple Period, edited by Pajunen, Mika S. and Penner, Jeremy. BZAW 486, 320–38. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar
Knoppers, Gary N. 1 Chronicles 1–9: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 12. New York: Doubleday, 2003.Google Scholar
Knoppers, Gary N. 1 Chronicles 10–29: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 12A. New York: Doubleday, 2004.Google Scholar
Knoppers, Gary N. Jews and Samaritans: The Origins and History of Their Early Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Koch-Westenholz, Ulla. Mesopotamian Astrology. CNI Publications 19. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 1995.Google Scholar
Kraft, Robert A. “Para-Mania: Beside, Before and Beyond Bible Studies.” JBL 126 (2007): 5–27.Google Scholar
Kratz, Reinhard G. Das Judentum im Zeitalter des Zweiten Tempels. FAT 42. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar
Kratz, Reinhard G. “Der ‘Penal Code’ und das Verhältnis von Serekh Ha-Yahad (S) und Damaskusschrift (D).” RevQ 25 (2011): 199–227.Google Scholar
Kratz, Reinhard G. “Reworked Pentateuch and Pentateuchal Theory.” In The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America, edited by Gertz, Jan C., Levinson, Bernard M., Rom-Shiloni, Dalit, and Schmid, Konrad. FAT 111, 501–24. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar
Kugel, James L. “Early Interpretation: The Common Background of Late Forms of Biblical Exegesis.” In Early Biblical Interpretation, by Kugel, James L. and Greer, Rowan A.. LEC 3, 11–106. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar
Kugel, James L. Traditions of the Bible. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kugel, James L. “The Compositional History of the Book of ‘Jubilees.’” RevQ 26 (2014): 517–37.Google Scholar
Laato, Antti, and van Ruiten, Jacques, eds. Rewritten Bible Reconsidered: Proceedings of the Conference in Karkku, Finland August 24–26 2006. Turku: Åbo Akademi; Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2008.Google Scholar
Lange, Armin. Handbuch Der Textfunde Vom Toten Meer, Band 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Lange, Armin. “‘They Confirmed the Reading’ (y. Ta‘an. 4.68a): The Textual Standardization of Jewish Scriptures in the Second Temple Period.” In From Qumran to Aleppo, edited by Lange, Armin, Weigold, Matthias, and Zsengellér, József, 29–80. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009.Google Scholar
Lange, Armin. “In the Second Degree: Ancient Jewish Paratextual Literature in the Context of Graeco-Roman and Ancient Near Eastern Literature.” In In the Second Degree: Paratextual Literature in Ancient Near Eastern and Ancient Mediterranean Culture and Its Reflections in Medieval Literature, edited by Alexander, Philip S., Lange, Armin, and Pillinger, Renate, 3–42. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Lenzi, Alan. “Scribal Revision and Textual Variation in Akkadian Šuila-Prayers: Two Case Studies in Ritual Adaptation.” In Empirical Models Challenging Biblical Criticism, edited by Person, Raymond F. Jr. and Rezetko, Robert. AIL 25, 63–108. Atlanta: SBL, 2016.Google Scholar
Leonard, Jeffery M. “Identifying Inner-Biblical Allusions: Psalm 78 as a Test Case.” JBL 127 (2008): 241–65.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jon D. Creation and the Persistence of Evil: The Jewish Drama of Divine Omnipotence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Levering, Miriam, ed. Rethinking Scripture: Essays from a Comparative Perspective. Albany: SUNY Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M. “The Human Voice in Divine Revelation: The Problem of Authority in Biblical Law.” In Innovation in Religious Traditions, edited by Williams, Michael A., Cox, Collett, and Jaffee, Martin S.. Religion and Society 31, 35–71. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M. Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M. “You Must Not Add Anything to What I Command You: Paradoxes of Canon and Authorship in Ancient Israel.” Numen 50 (2003): 1–51.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M. “The Manumission of Hermeneutics: The Slave Laws of the Pentateuch as a Challenge to Contemporary Pentateuchal Theory.” In Congress Volume Leiden 2004, edited by Lemaire, André. VTSup 109, 281–324. Leiden: Brill, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M. “The Right Chorale”: Studies in Biblical Law and Interpretation. FAT 54. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M. Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M., and Stackert, Jeffrey. “Between the Covenant Code and Esarhaddon’s Succession Treaty: Deuteronomy 13 and the Composition of Deuteronomy.” JAJ 3 (2012): 123–40.Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M., and Zahn, Molly M.. “Revelation Regained: The Hermeneutics of כי and אם in the Temple Scroll.” DSD 9 (2002): 295–346.Google Scholar
Lied, Liv Ingeborg. “Nachleben and Textual Identity: Variants and Variance in the Reception History of 2 Baruch.” In Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch: Reconstruction after the Fall, edited by Henze, Matthias and Boccaccini, Gabriele. JSJSup 164, 403–28. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Lied, Liv Ingeborg. “Between ‘Text Witness’ and ‘Text on the Page’: Trajectories in the History of Editing the Epistle of Baruch.” In Snapshots of Evolving Traditions, edited by Lied, Liv Ingeborg and Lundhaug, Hugo, 272–96. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, Ingrid E. Two Books of Ezekiel: Papyrus 967 and the Masoretic Text as Variant Literary Editions. VTSup 150. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Lim, Timothy. Pesharim. Companion to the Qumran Scrolls 3. London: Sheffield, 2002.Google Scholar
Livneh, Atar. “Deborah’s New Song: The Historical Résumé in LAB 32:1–11 in Context.” JSJ 48 (2017): 203–45.Google Scholar
Louw, Theo A. W. van der. “Linguistic or Ideological Shifts? The Problem-Oriented Study of Transformations as a Methodological Filter.” COLLeGIUM 7 (2012): 23–41.Google Scholar
Lucas, Alec J. “Scripture Citations as an Internal Redactional Control: 1QS 5:1–20a and Its 4Q Parallels.” DSD 17 (2010): 30–52.Google Scholar
Machan, Tim William. “Scribal Role, Authorial Intention, and Chaucer’s ‘Boece.’” The Chaucer Review 24 (1989): 150–62.Google Scholar
Machiela, Daniel A. The Dead Sea Genesis Apocryphon: A New Text and Translation with Introduction and Special Treatment of Columns 13–17. STDJ 79. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Machiela, Daniel A. “The Qumran Pesharim as Biblical Commentaries: Historical Context and Lines of Development.” DSD 19 (2012): 313–62.Google Scholar
Machiela, Daniel A. “The Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls: Coherence and Context in the Library of Qumran.” In The Dead Sea Scrolls at Qumran and the Concept of a Library, edited by Crawford, Sidnie White and Wassén, Cecilia. STDJ 116, 243–57. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Machiela, Daniel A. “Situating the Aramaic Texts from Qumran: Reconsidering Their Language and Socio-Historical Settings.” In Apocalyptic Thinking in Early Judaism, edited by Wassén, Cecilia and Crawford, Sidnie White. JSJSup 182, 88–109. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Machiela, Daniel A. “The Compositional Setting and Implied Audience of Some Aramaic Texts from Qumran: A Working Hypothesis.” In Vision, Narrative, and Wisdom in the Aramaic Texts from Qumran: Essays from the Copenhagen Symposium, 14–15 August, 2017, edited by Bundvad, Mette and Siegismund, Kasper. STDJ 131, 168–202. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Maier, Johann. Die Tempelrolle vom Toten Meer und das «Neue Jerusalem». 3rd ed. UTB 429. Munich: Ernst Reinhardt, 1997.Google Scholar
Metso, Sarianna. The Textual Development of the Qumran Community Rule. STDJ 21. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Metso, Sarianna. “Biblical Quotations in the Community Rule.” In The Bible as Book: The Hebrew Bible and the Judaean Desert Discoveries, edited by Herbert, Edward D. and Tov, Emanuel, 81–92. London: British Library, 2002.Google Scholar
Metso, Sarianna. The Serekh Texts. Companion to the Qumran Scrolls 9. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Michael, Tony S. L. “To the Reader of Barouch.” In A New English Translation of the Septuagint, edited by IIIWright, Benjamin G. and Pietersma, Albert, 925–27. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob. Leviticus 23–27. AB 3B. New York: Doubleday, 2001.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. “Genre As Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 151–67.Google Scholar
Milstein, Sara J. Tracking the Master Scribe: Revision through Introduction in Biblical and Mesopotamian Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Monger, Matthew P. “4Q216 and the State of Jubilees at Qumran.” RevQ 26 (2014): 595–612.Google Scholar
Moore, Carey A. Daniel, Esther and Jeremiah: The Additions. AB 44. Garden City: Doubleday, 1977.Google Scholar
Moore, Carey A. “Esther, Additions to.” In Anchor Bible Dictionary. Vol. 6, edited by Freedman, David Noel, 626–33. New York: Doubleday, 1992.Google Scholar
Mossop, Brian. “‘Intralingual Translation’: A Desirable Concept?” Across Languages and Cultures 17 (2016): 1–24.Google Scholar
Mroczek, Eva. “Moses, David and Scribal Revelation: Preservation and Renewal in Second Temple Jewish Textual Traditions.” In The Significance of Sinai: Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity, edited by Brooke, George J., Najman, Hindy, and Stuckenbruck, Loren T.. TBN 12, 91–115. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Mroczek, Eva. “Thinking Digitally about the Dead Sea Scrolls: Book History Before and Beyond the Book.” Book History 14 (2011): 241–69.Google Scholar
Mroczek, Eva. The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Mroczek, Eva. “The End of the Psalms in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Greek Codices, and Syriac Manuscripts.” In Snapshots of Evolving Traditions, edited by Lied, Liv Ingeborg and Lundhaug, Hugo, 297–322. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy. “Interpretation as Primordial Writing: Jubilees and Its Authority Conferring Strategies.” JSJ 30 (1999): 379–410.Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy. Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourse in Second Temple Judaism. JSJSup 77. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy. Past Renewals: Interpretative Authority, Renewed Revelation and the Quest for Perfection in Jewish Antiquity. JSJSup 53. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy. “The Idea of Biblical Genre: From Discourse to Constellation.” In Prayer and Poetry in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature, edited by Penner, Jeremy, Penner, Ken M., and Wassen, Cecilia. STDJ 98, 307–21. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy. “Jewish Wisdom in the Hellenistic Period: Towards the Study of a Semantic Constellation.” In Is There a Text in This Cave? Studies in the Textuality of the Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of George J. Brooke, edited by Feldman, Ariel, Cioată, Maria, and Hempel, Charlotte. STDJ 119, 459–72. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Najman, Hindy, and Tigchelaar, Eibert. “Unity after Fragmentation.” RevQ 26 (2014): 495–500.Google Scholar
Nati, James. “Compositional Technique in the Temple Scroll: Creative Interpretation and Integrative Interpretation in the Passover Legislation.” In New Vistas on Early Judaism and Christianity, edited by DiTommaso, Lorenzo and Oegema, Gerbern S., 112–30. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016.Google Scholar
Newman, Judith H. Before the Bible: The Liturgical Body and the Formation of Scriptures in Early Judaism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Newsom, Carol A. The Self As Symbolic Space: Constructing Identity and Community at Qumran. STDJ 52. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Newsom, Carol A. “Rhyme and Reason: The Historical Résumé in Israelite and Early Jewish Thought.” In Congress Volume Leiden 2004, edited by Lemaire, André. VTSup 109, 215–33. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Newsom, Carol A. “Spying out the Land: A Report from Genology.” In Bakhtin and Genre Theory in Biblical Studies, edited by Boer, Roland. SemeiaSt 63, 19–30. Atlanta: SBL, 2007.Google Scholar
Newsom, Carol A. “Pairing Research Questions and Theories of Genre: A Case Study of the Hodayot.” DSD 17 (2010): 270–88.Google Scholar
Newsom, Carol A. “Deriving Negative Anthropology through Exegetical Activity: The Hodayot as Case Study.” In Is There a Text in This Cave? Studies in the Textuality of the Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of George J. Brooke, edited by Feldman, Ariel, Cioată, Maria, and Hempel, Charlotte. STDJ 119, 258–74. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene. “Principles of Correspondence.” In The Translation Studies Reader, edited by Venuti, Lawrence, 141–55. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Niditch, Susan. Oral World and Written Word: Ancient Israelite Literature. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1996.Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren R. Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren R. “Commentary Culture in the Land of Israel from an Alexandrian Perspective.” DSD 19 (2012): 442–63.Google Scholar
Norton, Jonathan D. H. Contours in the Text: Textual Variation in the Writings of Paul, Josephus, and the Yaḥad. LNTS 430. London: Bloomsbury, 2011.Google Scholar
Paganini, Simone. “Nicht darfst du zu diesen Wörtern etwas hinzufügen”: Die Rezeption des Deuteronomiums in der Tempelrolle: Sprache, Autoren und Hermeneutik. BZABR 11. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2009.Google Scholar
Pakkala, Juha. God’s Word Omitted: Omissions in the Transmission of the Hebrew Bible. FRLANT 251. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013.Google Scholar
Person, Raymond F. Jr. “Text Criticism as a Lens for Understanding the Transmission of Ancient Texts in Their Oral Environments.” In Contextualizing Israel’s Sacred Writings: Ancient Literacy, Orality, and Literary Production, edited by Schmidt, Brian B.. AIL 22, 197–215. Atlanta: SBL, 2015.Google Scholar
Person, Raymond F. Jr., and Robert, Rezetko, eds. Empirical Models Challenging Biblical Criticism. AIL 25. Atlanta: SBL, 2016.Google Scholar
Petersen, Anders Klostergaard. “Rewritten Bible as a Borderline Phenomenon –Genre, Textual Strategy, or Canonical Anachronism?” In Flores Florentino: Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Early Jewish Studies in Honour of Florentino García Martínez, edited by Hilhorst, Anthony, Puech, Émile, and Tigchelaar, Eibert. JSJSup 122, 285–306. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Petersen, Anders Klostergaard. “The Riverrun of Rewriting Scripture: From Textual Cannibalism to Scriptural Completion.” JSJ 43 (2012): 475–96.Google Scholar
Petersen, Anders Klostergaard. “Textual Fidelity, Elaboration, Supersession or Encroachment? Typological Reflections on the Phenomenon of Rewritten Scripture.” In Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques?, edited by Zsengellér, József. JSJSup 166, 13–48. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Pietersma, Albert. “A New Paradigm for Addressing Old Questions: The Relevance of the Interlinear Model for the Study of the Septuagint.” In Bible and Computer: The Stellenbosch AAIBI Conference, edited by Cook, J., 337–64. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Pietersma, Albert. “Exegesis in the Septuagint: Possibilities and Limits (the Psalter as a Case in Point).” In Septuagint Research: Issues and Challenges in the Study of the Greek Jewish Scriptures, edited by Kraus, Wolfgang and Wooden, R. Glenn. SBLSCS 53, 33–45. Atlanta: SBL, 2006.Google Scholar
Pietersma, Albert. “Beyond Literalism: Interlinearity Revisited.” In “Translation Is Required”: The Septuagint in Retrospect and Prospect, edited by Hiebert, Robert J. V.. SBLSCS 56, 3–21. Atlanta: SBL, 2010.Google Scholar
Pietersma, Albert, and Wright, Benjamin G.. “To the Reader of NETS.” In A New English Translation of the Septuagint, edited by Pietersma, Albert and Wright, Benjamin G., xiii–xx. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Popović, Mladen. “Introducing Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism.” In Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, edited by Popović, Mladen. JSJSup 141, 1–17. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Popović, Mladen. “Prophet, Books and Texts: Ezekiel, Pseudo-Ezekiel and the Authoritativeness of Ezekiel Traditions in Early Judaism.” In Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, edited by Popović, Mladen. JSJSup 141, 227–51. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Popović, Mladen. “Reading, Writing, and Memorizing Together: Reading Culture in Ancient Judaism and the Dead Sea Scrolls in a Mediterranean Context.” DSD 24 (2017): 447–70.Google Scholar
Puech, Émile. Textes Hebreux (4Q521–4Q528, 4Q576–4Q579): Qumran Cave 4.XVIII. DJD 25. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. Exploring Translation Theories. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Qimron, Elisha. The Dead Sea Scrolls: The Hebrew Writings. Vol 1. (In Hebrew). Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi, 2010.Google Scholar
Rad, Gerhard von. Gesammelte Studien zum Alten Testament. Munich: Kaiser, 1961.Google Scholar
Rajak, Tessa. Translation and Survival: The Greek Bible of the Ancient Jewish Diaspora. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko. “Writing Jewish Astronomy in the Early Hellenistic Age: The Enochic Astronomical Book as Aramaic Wisdom and Archival Impulse.” DSD 24 (2017): 1–37.Google Scholar
IIIReynolds, Bennie H.. Between Symbolism and Realism: The Use of Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Language in Ancient Jewish Apocalypses 333–63 B.C.E. JAJSup 8. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2011.Google Scholar
Rofé, Alexander. “The Acts of Nahash According to 4QSama.” IEJ 32 (1982): 129–33.Google Scholar
Rofé, Alexander. “4QMidrash Samuel? – Observations Concerning the Character of 4QSama.” Textus 19 (1998): 63–74.Google Scholar
Rösel, Martin. Übersetzung als Vollendung der Auslegung: Studien zur Genesis-Septuaginta. BZAW 223. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1994.Google Scholar
Samely, Alexander. The Interpretation of Speech in the Pentateuch Targums: A Study of Method and Presentation in Targumic Exegesis. TSAJ 27. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.Google Scholar
Samely, Alexander. “Is Targumic Aramaic Rabbinic Hebrew? A Reflection on Midrashic and Targumic Rewording of Scripture.” JJS 45 (1994): 92–100.Google Scholar
Samely, Alexander. “The Targums within a New Description of Jewish Text Structures in Antiquity.” Aramaic Studies 9 (2011): 5–38.Google Scholar
Samely, Alexander. “Observations on the Structure and Literary Fabric of the Temple Scroll.” In The Temple in Text and Tradition: A Festschrift in Honour of Robert Hayward, edited by McLay, R. Timothy. LSTS 83, 233–77. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Samely, Alexander, in collaboration with Alexander, Philip, Bernasconi, Rocco, and Hayward, Robert. Profiling Jewish Literature in Antiquity: An Inventory, from Second Temple Texts to the Talmuds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Samely, Alexander, Alexander, Philip, Bernasconi, Rocco, and Hayward, Robert, eds. “Database for the Analysis of Anonymous and Pseudepigraphic Jewish Texts of Antiquity.” http://literarydatabase.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
Sanders, James A. The Psalms Scroll of Qumran Cave 11 (11QPsa). DJD 4. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.Google Scholar
Sanders, Seth L. “Introduction to How to Build a Sacred Text in the Ancient Near East.” JANER 15 (2015): 113–20.Google Scholar
Sanders, Seth L. “What If There Aren’t Any Empirical Models for Pentateuchal Criticism?” In Contextualizing Israel’s Sacred Writings: Ancient Literacy, Orality, and Literary Production, edited by Schmidt, Brian B.. AIL 22, 281–304. Atlanta: SBL, 2015.Google Scholar
Sanders, Seth L. From Adapa to Enoch: Scribal Culture and Religious Vision in Judea and Babylon. TSAJ 167. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Judith E. An Exodus Scroll from Qumran: 4QpaleoExodM and the Samaritan Tradition. HSS 30. Atlanta: Scholars, 1986.Google Scholar
Sarna, Nahum M. “Psalm 89: A Study in Inner Biblical Exegesis.” In Biblical and Other Studies, edited by Altmann, Alexander, 29–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Peter. “Research into Rabbinic Literature: An Attempt to Define the Status Quaestionis.” JJS 37 (1986): 139–52.Google Scholar
Schams, Christine. Jewish Scribes in the Second-Temple Period. JSOTSup 291. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schaper, Joachim. “‘Scriptural Turn’ und Monotheismus: Überlegungen zu einer (nicht ganz) neuen These.” In Die Textualisierung der Religion, edited by Schaper, Joachim. FAT 62, 275–91. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Lawrence H. “The Deuteronomic Paraphrase of the Temple Scroll.” RevQ 15 (1992): 543–67.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Lawrence H. The Courtyards of the House of the Lord: Studies on the Temple Scroll, edited by Martínez, Florentino García. STDJ 75. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Lawrence H. “The Unfinished Scroll: A Reconsideration of the End of the Temple Scroll.” DSD 15 (2008): 67–78.Google Scholar
Schironi, Francesca. “Greek Commentaries.” DSD 19 (2012): 399–441.Google Scholar
Schmid, Konrad. “Innerbiblische Schriftauslegung: Aspekte der Forschungsgeschichte.” In Schriftauslegung in der Schrift: Festschrift für Odil Hannes Steck zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, edited by Kratz, Reinhard G., Krüger, Thomas, and Schmid, Konrad. BZAW 300, 1–22. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Schmid, Konrad. Literaturgeschichte des Alten Testaments: Eine Einführung. Darmstadt: WBG, 2008.Google Scholar
Schniedewind, William M. “Scripturalization in Ancient Judah.” In Contextualizing Israel’s Sacred Writings: Ancient Literacy, Orality, and Literary Production, edited by Schmidt, Brian B.. AIL 22, 305–22. Atlanta: SBL, 2015.Google Scholar
Schofield, Alison. From Qumran to the Yaḥad: A New Paradigm of Textual Development for the Community Rule. STDJ 77. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Schuller, Eileen. “Hodayot.” In Qumran Cave 4.XX: Poetical and Liturgical Texts, Part 2, edited by Chazon, Esther et al. DJD 29, 69–254. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Julie. Dear Committee Members. New York: Doubleday, 2014.Google Scholar
Screnock, John. Traductor Scriptor: The Old Greek Translation of Exodus 1–14 as Scribal Activity. VTSup 174. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Screnock, John. “Is Rewriting Translation? Chronicles and Jubilees in Light of Intralingual Translation.” VT 68 (2018): 475–504.Google Scholar
Seeligmann, Isac Leo. The Septuagint of Isaiah and Cognate Studies. FAT 40. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar
Segal, Michael. “4QReworked Pentateuch or 4QPentateuch?” In The Dead Sea Scrolls: Fifty Years after Their Discovery, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H., Tov, Emanuel, and VanderKam, James C., 391–99. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society/Shrine of the Book, Israel Museum, 2000.Google Scholar
Segal, Michael. “Between Bible and Rewritten Bible.” In Biblical Interpretation at Qumran, edited by Henze, Matthias, 10–29. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar
Segal, Michael. The Book of Jubilees: Rewritten Bible, Redaction, Ideology and Theology. JSJSup 117. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Segal, Michael. “The Text of the Hebrew Bible in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Materia Giudaica 12 (2007): 5–20.Google Scholar
Segal, Michael. “The Dynamics of Composition and Rewriting in Jubilees and Pseudo-Jubilees.” RevQ 26 (2014): 555–77.Google Scholar
Segal, Michael. “Reconsidering the Relationship(s) between 4Q365, 4Q365a, and the Temple Scroll.” RevQ 30 (2018): 213–33.Google Scholar
Sinding, Michael. “After Definitions: Genre, Categories, and Cognitive Science.” Genre 35 (2002): 181–219.Google Scholar
Skehan, Patrick W., Ulrich, Eugene, and Sanderson, Judith E.. Qumran Cave 4.IV: Palaeo-Hebrew and Greek Biblical Manuscripts. DJD 9. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.Google Scholar
Smith, Helen, and Wilson, Louise, eds. Renaissance Paratexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. What Is Scripture? A Comparative Approach. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sneed, Mark R., ed. Was There a Wisdom Tradition? New Prospects in Israelite Wisdom Studies. AIL 23. Atlanta: SBL, 2015.Google Scholar
Sommer, Benjamin D. “Exegesis, Allusion and Intertextuality in the Hebrew Bible: A Response to Lyle Eslinger.” VT 46 (1996): 479–89.Google Scholar
Sommer, Benjamin D. A Prophet Reads Scripture: Allusion in Isaiah 40–66. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sperber, Alexander. The Bible in Aramaic, Volume IV B: The Targum and the Hebrew Bible. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar
Stackert, Jeffrey. Rewriting the Torah: Literary Revision in Deuteronomy and the Holiness Legislation. FAT 52. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.Google Scholar
Stackert, Jeffrey. A Prophet like Moses: Prophecy, Law, and Israelite Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Steudel, Annette. “The Damascus Document (D) as a Rewriting of the Community Rule (S).” RevQ 25 (2012): 605–20.Google Scholar
Stock, Brian. The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Strine, Casey A. “On the Compositional Models for Ezekiel 38–39: A Response to William Tooman’s Gog of Magog.” VT 67 (2017): 589–601.Google Scholar
Stuckenbruck, Loren T., and Freedman, David Noel. “The Fragments of a Targum to Leviticus in Qumran Cave 4 (4Q156): A Linguistic Comparison and Assessment.” In Targum and Scripture: Studies in Aramaic Translation and Interpretation in Memory of Ernest G. Clarke, edited by Flesher, Paul V. M., 79–95. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Swanson, Dwight D. The Temple Scroll and the Bible: The Methodology of 11QT. STDJ 14. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Talmon, Shemaryahu. Text and Canon of the Hebrew Bible: Collected Studies. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2010.Google Scholar
Ta-Shma, Israel M. “The ‘Open’ Book in Medieval Hebrew Literature: The Problem of Authorized Editions.” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 75, no. 3 (1993): 17–24.Google Scholar
Teeter, David Andrew. “‘You Shall Not Seethe a Kid in Its Mother’s Milk’: The Text and the Law in Light of Early Witnesses.” Textus 24 (2009): 37–63.Google Scholar
Teeter, David Andrew. “The Hebrew Bible and/as Second Temple Literature: Methodological Reflections.” DSD 20 (2013): 349–77.Google Scholar
Teeter, David Andrew. “On ‘Exegetical Function’ in Rewritten Scripture: Inner-Biblical Exegesis and the Abram/Ravens Narrative in Jubilees.” HTR 106 (2013): 373–402.Google Scholar
Teeter, David Andrew. “Torah, Wisdom, and the Composition of Rewritten Scripture: Jubilees and 11QPsa in Comparative Perspective.” In Wisdom and Torah: The Reception of ‘Torah’ in the Wisdom Literature of the Second Temple Period, edited by Schipper, Bernd and Teeter, D. Andrew. JSJSup 163, 233–72. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Teeter, David Andrew. Scribal Laws: Exegetical Variation in the Textual Transmission of Biblical Law in the Late Second Temple Period. FAT 92. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar
Tervanotko, Hanna. “You Shall See: Rebekah’s Farewell Address in 4Q364 ii, 1–6.” In The Hebrew Bible in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls, edited by Dávid, Nóra, Lange, Armin, Troyer, Kristin De, and Tzoref, Shani. FRLANT 239, 413–26. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2011.Google Scholar
Tervanotko, Hanna. “Reading God’s Will? Function and Status of Oracle Interpreters in Ancient Jewish and Greek Texts.” DSD 24 (2017): 424–46.Google Scholar
Teugels, Lieve. “Textual Criticism of Late Rabbinic Midrashim: The Example of Aggadat Bereshit.” In Recent Developments in Textual Criticism: New Testament, Other Early Christian and Jewish Literature, edited by Weren, Wim and Koch, Dietrich-Alex, 207–55. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2003.Google Scholar
Thomas, Samuel I. “Eternal Writing and Immortal Writers: On the Non-Death of the Scribe in Early Judaism.” In A Teacher for All Generations: Essays in Honor of James C. VanderKam. Vol. 2, edited by Mason, Eric F., Bautch, Kelley Coblentz, Harkins, Angela Kim, and Machiela, Daniel A.. JSJSup 153, 573–88. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Tigay, Jeffrey H., ed. Empirical Models for Biblical Criticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Tigay, Jeffrey H., The JPS Torah Commentary: Deuteronomy. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1996.Google Scholar
Tigchelaar, Eibert. “Aramaic Texts from Qumran and the Authoritativeness of Hebrew Scriptures: Preliminary Observations.” In Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, edited by Popović, Mladen. JSJSup 141, 155–71. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Tigchelaar, Eibert. “The Qumran ‘Jubilees’ Manuscripts as Evidence for the Literary Growth of the Book.” RevQ 26 (2014): 579–94.Google Scholar
Tigchelaar, Eibert. “Jeremiah’s Scriptures in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Growth of a Tradition.” In Jeremiah’s Scriptures: Production, Reception, Interaction, and Transformation, edited by Najman, Hindy and Schmid, Konrad. JSJSup 173, 289–306. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Tigchelaar, Eibert. “Thrice Nahum 3:8–10: MT, LXX, and 4Q385a 17 ii – New Proposals.” In Sibyls, Scriptures, and Scrolls: John Collins at Seventy. Vol 2, edited by Baden, Joel, Najman, Hindy, and Tigchelaar, Eibert. JSJSup 175/2, 1265–77. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Translated by Howard, Richard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. “The Origin of Genres.” New Literary History 8 (1976): 159–70.Google Scholar
Tooman, William A. “Between Imitation and Interpretation: Reuse of Scripture and Composition in Hodayot (1QHa) 11:6–19.” DSD 18 (2011): 54–73.Google Scholar
Tooman, William A. Gog of Magog: Reuse of Scripture and Compositional Technique in Ezekiel 38–39. FAT 52. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Toorn, Karel van der. Scribal Culture and the Making of the Hebrew Bible. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon. Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Rev. ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2012.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. “364–367. 4QReworked Pentateuchb–e: Introduction.” In Qumran Cave 4.VIII: Parabiblical Texts, Part 1, edited by Attridge, Harold et al. DJD 13, 187–96. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. “Rewritten Bible Compositions and Biblical Manuscripts, with Special Attention to the Samaritan Pentateuch.” DSD 5 (1998): 334–54.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. The Greek and Hebrew Bible: Collected Essays on the Septuagint. VTSup 72. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert. STDJ 54. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. Hebrew Bible, Greek Bible and Qumran: Collected Essays. TSAJ 121. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. “From 4QReworked Pentateuch to 4QPentateuch (?).” In Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, edited by Popović, Mladen. JSJSup 141, 73–91. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. “Scribal Features of Two Qumran Scrolls.” In Hebrew in the Second Temple Period: The Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and of Other Contemporary Sources, edited by Fassberg, Steven E., Bar-Asher, Moshe, and Clements, Ruth A.. STDJ 108, 241–58. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Troxel, Ronald L. LXX-Isaiah as Translation and Interpretation: The Strategies of the Translator of the Septuagint of Isaiah. JSJSup 124. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Eugene. “The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Biblical Text.” In The Dead Sea Scrolls after Fifty Years: A Comprehensive Assessment. Vol. 1, edited by Flint, Peter W. and VanderKam, James C., 79–100. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Eugene. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Origins of the Bible. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Eugene. “From Literature to Scripture: Reflections on the Growth of a Text’s Authoritativeness.” DSD 10 (2003): 3–25.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Eugene. The Biblical Qumran Scrolls: Transcriptions and Textual Variants. VTSup 134. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Eugene. “Methodological Reflections on Determining Scriptural Status in First Century Judaism.” In Rediscovering the Dead Sea Scrolls: An Assessment of Old and New Approaches and Methods, edited by Grossman, Maxine L., 145–61. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Eugene. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Developmental Composition of the Bible. VTSup 169. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C. The Book of Jubilees. 2 vols. CSCO 510–511. Leuven: Peeters, 1989.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C. “Authoritative Literature in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” DSD 5 (1998): 382–402.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C. The Book of Jubilees. Guides to Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C. From Revelation to Canon: Studies in the Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Literature. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C. “Questions of Canon Viewed through the Dead Sea Scrolls.” In The Canon Debate, edited by McDonald, Lee Martin and Sanders, James A., 91–109. Peabody: Hendrikson, 2002.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C. “Jubilees as the Composition of One Author?” RevQ 26 (2014): 501–16.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C. Jubilees 1: A Commentary on the Book of Jubilees Chapters 1–21. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2018.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C., and Milik, J. T.. “216. 4QJubileesa.” In Qumran Cave 4.VIII: Parabiblical Texts, Part 1, edited by Attridge, Harold et al. DJD 13, 1–22. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James C., and Milik, J. T.. “227. 4Qpseudo-Jubileesc.” In Qumran Cave 4.VIII: Parabiblical Texts, Part 1, edited by Attridge, Harold et al. DJD 13, 171–75. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Vanonen, Hanna. “Stable and Fluid War Traditions: Re-thinking the War Text Material from Qumran.” PhD diss., University of Helsinki, 2017.Google Scholar
Van Seters, John. A Law Book for the Diaspora: Revision in the Study of the Covenant Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Van Seters, John. The Edited Bible: The Curious History of the “Editor” in Biblical Criticism. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2006.Google Scholar
Veldhuis, Niek. “Mesopotamian Canons.” In Homer, the Bible, and Beyond: Literary and Religious Canons in the Ancient World, edited by Finkelberg, Margalit and Stroumsa, Guy G., 9–28. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. “Genealogies of Translation Theory: Jerome.” In The Translation Studies Reader, edited by Venuti, Lawrence, 483–502. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Vermes, Geza. Scripture and Tradition in Judaism: Haggadic Studies. 2nd ed. StPB 4. Leiden: Brill, 1973.Google Scholar
Vermes, Geza. “Preliminary Remarks on Unpublished Fragments of the Community Rule from Qumran Cave 4.” JJS 42 (1991): 250–55.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. Ross. Reading the Sealed Book: Old Greek Isaiah and the Problem of Septuagint Hermeneutics. FAT 88. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Watts, James W. Psalm and Story: Inset Hymns in Hebrew Narrative. JSOTSup 139. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Weiss, Raphael. Studies in the Text and Language of the Bible (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magness, 1981.Google Scholar
von Weissenberg, Hanne, and Uusimäki, Elisa. “Are There Sacred Texts at Qumran?” In Is There a Text in This Cave? Studies in the Textuality of the Dead Sea Scrolls in Honour of George J. Brooke, edited by Feldman, Ariel, Cioată, Maria, and Hempel, Charlotte. STDJ 119, 21–41. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Werman, Cana. “The Canonization of the Hebrew Bible in Light of Second Temple Literature.” In From Author to Copyist: Essays on the Composition, Redaction, and Transmission of the Hebrew Bible in Honor of Zipi Talshir, edited by Werman, Cana, 337–65. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2015.Google Scholar
Wevers, John William. Notes on the Greek Text of Deuteronomy. SBLSCS 39. Atlanta: Scholars, 1995.Google Scholar
Wevers, John William. “The Interpretive Character and Significance of the Septuagint Version.” In Hebrew Bible / Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation. Vol. 1, part 1, edited by Sæbø, Magne, 84–107. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.Google Scholar
Wevers, John William. Notes on the Greek Text of Numbers. SBLSCS 46. Atlanta: Scholars, 1998.Google Scholar
Williamson, Robert Jr. “Pesher: A Cognitive Model of the Genre.” DSD 17 (2010): 336–60.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew M., and Wills, Lawrence. “Literary Sources of the Temple Scroll.” HTR 75 (1982): 275–88.Google Scholar
Wimbush, Vincent L., ed. Theorizing Scriptures: New Cultural Orientations to a Cultural Phenomenon. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wise, Michael Owen. A Critical Study of the Temple Scroll from Qumran Cave 11. SAOC 49. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 1990.Google Scholar
IIIWright, Benjamin G.. “Access to the Source: Cicero, Ben Sira, the Septuagint and Their Audiences.” JSJ 34 (2003): 1–27.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin G., “The Septuagint and Its Modern Translators.” In Die Septuaginta – Texte, Kontexte, Lebenswelten, edited by Kraus, Wolfgang and Karrer, Martin. WUNT 219, 103–14. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin G., “The Epistle of Jeremiah: Translation or Composition?” In Deuterocanonical Additions of the Old Testament Books, edited by Xeravits, Géza G. and Zsengellér, József. DCLS 5, 126–42. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin G., “Joining the Club: A Suggestion about Genre in Early Jewish Texts.” DSD 17 (2010): 289–314.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin G., “Scribes, Translators and the Formation of Authoritative Scripture.” In In the Footsteps of Sherlock Holmes: Studies in the Biblical Text in Honour of Anneli Aejmelaeus, edited by Troyer, Kristin De, Law, T. Michael, and Liljeström, Marketta. CBET 72, 3–29. Leuven: Peeters, 2014.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin G., “Translation, Reception, and the Historiography of Early Judaism: The Wisdom of Ben Sira and Old Greek Job as Case Studies.” In “When the Morning Stars Sang”: Essays in Honor of Choon Leong Seow on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, edited by Jones, Scott C. and Yoder, Christine Roy. BZAW 500, 241–57. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.Google Scholar
Yadin, Yigael. The Temple Scroll. 3 vols. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1977–83.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Reexamining Empirical Models: The Case of Exodus 13.” In Das Deuteronomium zwischen Pentateuch und deuteronomistischem Geschichtswerk, edited by Otto, Eckart and Achenbach, Reinhard. FRLANT 206, 36–55. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “New Voices, Ancient Words: The Temple Scroll’s Reuse of the Bible.” In Temple and Worship in Biblical Israel, edited by Day, John. LHB/OTS 422, 435–58. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Rewritten Scripture.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls, edited by Lim, Timothy H. and Collins, John J., 323–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. Rethinking Rewritten Scripture: Composition and Exegesis in the 4QReworked Pentateuch Manuscripts. STDJ 95. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Talking about Rewritten Texts: Some Reflections on Terminology.” In Changes in Scripture: Rewriting and Interpreting Authoritative Traditions in the Second Temple Period, edited by von Weissenberg, Hanne, Pakkala, Juha, and Marttila, Marko. BZAW 419, 93–119. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “4QReworked Pentateuch C and the Literary Sources of the Temple Scroll: A New (Old) Proposal.” DSD 19 (2012): 133–58.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Genre and Rewritten Scripture: A Reassessment.” JBL 131 (2012): 271–88.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Torah for ‘the Age of Wickedness’: The Authority of the Damascus and Serekh Texts in Light of Biblical and Rewritten Traditions.” DSD 20 (2013): 410–32.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Prophecy Rewritten: Use of Scriptural Traditions in 4QPseudo-Ezekiel.” JAJ 5 (2014): 335–67.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “The Samaritan Pentateuch and the Scribal Culture of Second Temple Judaism.” JSJ 46 (2015): 285–313.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Innerbiblical Exegesis – The View from beyond the Bible.” In The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America, edited by Gertz, Jan C., Levinson, Bernard M., Rom-Shiloni, Dalit, and Schmid, Konrad. FAT 111, 107–20. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Scribal Revision and the Composition of the Pentateuch: Methodological Issues.” In The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America, edited by Gertz, Jan C., Levinson, Bernard M., Rom-Shiloni, Dalit, and Schmid, Konrad. FAT 111, 491–500. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Beyond ‘Qumran Scribal Practice’: The Case of the Temple Scroll.” RevQ 29 (2017): 185–203.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Exegesis, Ideology, and Literary History in the Temple Scroll: The Case of the Temple Plan.” In Hā-’îsh Mōshe: Studies in Scriptural Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature in Honor of Moshe J. Bernstein, edited by Goldstein, Binyamin, Segal, Michael, and Brooke, George J.. STDJ 122, 330–42. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “The Levites, the Royal Council, and the Relationship between Chronicles and the Temple Scroll.” In Law, Literature, and Society in Legal Texts from Qumran: Papers from the Ninth Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies, Leuven 2016, edited by Jokiranta, Jutta and Zahn, Molly M.. STDJ 128, 253–69. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Zahn, Molly M. “Torah, Traditioning of.” In T&T Clark Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, Vol. 2, edited by Gurtner, Daniel and Stuckenbruck, Loren T., 783–85. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.Google Scholar
Zakovitch, Yair. “Inner-biblical Interpretation.” In A Companion to Biblical Interpretation in Early Judaism, edited by Henze, Matthias, 27–63. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Zsengellér, József, ed. Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? JSJSup 166. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Molly M. Zahn
  • Book: Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769983.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Molly M. Zahn
  • Book: Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769983.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Molly M. Zahn
  • Book: Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769983.010
Available formats
×