In modernity’s debates on legal theory, natural law is not widely accepted. The term nature as it appears in natural law arguments does not correspond with the term used in modern sciences, as it understands nature to be a source of normativity. The normative content of nature is open to discussion and debate. Although there are fundamental human goods (like life, caring for offspring, property and religiosity), the normative significance of which is affirmed in most cultures, there is no consent on the normative consequences derived from them. Approaches of natural law are therefore always plural. The content of the natural “ought” is a “matter of faith”, depending on philosophical, ethical, and religious beliefs and predispositions. It is possible to explain the plurality of natural laws by doubting that an objective natural normativity exists. It can also be explained as a problem of perceiving the existing natural normativity. The Christian approach to natural law believes in the existence of the naturally right, which is assumed as given by God the creator. Yet, as with all human thought, Christian thinking is also challenged with perceiving natural law.