Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:09:44.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Stroke Units and Clinical Assessment

from Section 4 - Therapeutic Strategies and Neurorehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2019

Michael Brainin
Affiliation:
Donau-Universität Krems, Austria
Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD000197.Google Scholar
Kjellström, T, Norrving, B, Shatchkute, A. Helsingborg Declaration 2006 on European stroke strategies. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 231–41.Google Scholar
Terént, A, Asplund, K, Farahmand, B, et al. Stroke unit care revisited: who benefits the most? A cohort study of 105,043 patients in Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 881–7.Google Scholar
Ringelstein, EB, Chamorro, A, Kaste, M, et al. European Stroke Organisation recommendations to establish a stroke unit and stroke center. Stroke 2013; 44: 828–40.Google Scholar
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 457507.Google Scholar
Berglund, A, Svensson, L, Sjöstrand, C, et al. Higher prehospital priority level of stroke improves thrombolysis frequency and time to stroke unit: the Hyper Acute STroke Alarm (HASTA) study. Stroke 2012; 43: 2666–70.Google Scholar
Baldereschi, M, Piccardi, B, Di Carlo, A, et al. Relevance of prehospital stroke code activation for acute treatment measures in stroke care: a review. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34: 182–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Khoury, R, Jung, R, Nanda, A, et al. Overview of key factors in improving access to acute stroke care. Neurology 2012; 79: S26–34.Google Scholar
Meretoja, A, Kaste, M. Pre- and in-hospital intersection of stroke care. Ann NY Acad Sci 2012; 1268: 145–51.Google Scholar
Kothari, R, Barsan, W, Brott, T, Broderick, J, Ashbrock, S. Frequency and accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute stroke. Stroke 1995; 26: 937–41.Google Scholar
Kothari, RU, Pancioli, A, Liu, T, Brott, T, Broderick, J. Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 373–8.Google Scholar
Nor, AM, McAllister, C, Louw, SJ, et al. Agreement between ambulance paramedic- and physician-recorded neurological signs with Face Arm Speech Test (FAST) in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 1355–9.Google Scholar
Kidwell, CS, Starkman, S, Eckstein, M, Weems, K, Saver, JL. Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS). Stroke 2000; 31: 71–6.Google Scholar
Bray, JE, Martin, J, Cooper, G, et al. Paramedic identification of stroke: community validation of the Melbourne ambulance stroke screen. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20: 2833.Google Scholar
McTaggart, RA, Yaghi, S, Cutting, SM, et al. Association of a primary stroke center protocol for suspected stroke by large-vessel occlusion with efficiency of care and patient outcomes. JAMA Neurol 2017; 74: 793800.Google Scholar
Lindsberg, PJ, Häppölä, O, Kallela, M, et al. Door to thrombolysis: ER reorganization and reduced delays to acute stroke treatment. Neurology 2006; 67: 334–6.Google Scholar
Meretoja, A, Strbian, D, Mustanoja, S, et al. Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 2012; 79: 306–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Audebert, HJ, Schenkel, J, Heuschmann, PU, et al. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 742–8.Google Scholar
Hess, DC, Wang, S, Gross, H, et al. Telestroke: extending stroke expertise into underserved areas. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 275–8.Google Scholar
Zaidi, SF, Jumma, MA, Urra, XN, et al. Telestroke-guided intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment achieves a similar clinical outcome as thrombolysis at a comprehensive stroke center. Stroke 2011; 42: 3291–3.Google Scholar
Weber, JE, Ebinger, M, Rozanski, M, et al. Prehospital thrombolysis in acute stroke: results of the PHANTOM-S pilot study. Neurology 2013; 80: 163–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunz, A, Ebinger, M, Geisler, F, et al. Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 1035–43.Google Scholar
Leys, D, Ringelstein, EB, Kaste, M, Hacke, W, Executive Committee of the European Stroke Initiative. Facilities available in European hospitals treating stroke patients. Stroke 2007; 38: 2985–91.Google Scholar
European Stroke Initiative Writing Committee, Writing Committee for the EUSI Executive Committee, Steiner, T, et al. Recommendations for the management of intracranial haemorrhage – part I: spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22: 294316.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, Dennis, M. Stroke Units: An Evidence Based Approach. London: BMJ Books; 1999.Google Scholar
Urimubenshi, G, Langhorne, P, Cadilhac, DA, Kagwiza, JN, Wu, O. Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Stroke J 2017; 2: 287307.Google Scholar
Aboderin, I, Venables, G. Stroke management in Europe. Pan European Consensus Meeting on Stroke Management. J Intern Med 1996; 240: 173–80.Google Scholar
Walter, S, Kostopoulos, P, Haass, A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 397404.Google Scholar
De Castro, S, Papetti, F, Di Angelantonio, E, et al. Feasibility and clinical utility of transesophageal echocardiography in the acute phase of cerebral ischemia. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 1339–44.Google Scholar
Vahedi, K, Hofmeijer, J, Juettler, E, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 215–22.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×