Book contents
- The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology
- The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Epistemological and Metaphysical Foundations
- Part II The Construction of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2019
Book contents
- The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology
- The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Epistemological and Metaphysical Foundations
- Part II The Construction of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Foundation of Norms in Islamic Jurisprudence and Theology , pp. 228 - 237Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abrahamov, Binyamin. “Necessary Knowledge in Islamic Theology.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 20(1) (1993): 20–32.Google Scholar
Abrahamov, Binyamin. Islamic Theology: Traditionalism and Rationalism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Abū l-Baqāʾ, Ayyūb b. Musā al-Ḥusaynī. al-Kulliyyāt: muʿjam fī l-muṣṭalaḥạ̄t wa l-furūq al-lughawīyya. Darwīsh, ʿAdnān and al-Maṣrī, Muḥammad, eds. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1992.Google Scholar
Abū Yaʿlā al-Farrāʾ, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥusayn. al-ʿUdda fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Sīr al-Mubārakī, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī, ed. 5 vols. Riyadh: Jāmiʿat al-Imām Muḥammad b. Saʿud al-Islāmiyya, 1990.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. “A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness,” in Outka, G. and Reeder, J. R., eds. Religion and Morality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Ahmad Atif. Structural Interrelations of Theory and Practice in Islamic Law: A Study of Six Works of Medieval Islamic Jurisprudence. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
al-Aḥmadnagarī, ʿAbd al-Nabī ʿAbd al-Rasūl. Jāmiʿ ul-ʿulūm: al-mulaqqab bi-dustūr ul-ʿulamāʾfī-ṣṭilāḥāt il-ʿulūm wa l-funūn. al-Dīn al-Ḥaydarabādī, Quṭb, ed. Haidarabad: Dāʾirat al-maʿārif al-niẓāmīyya, 1911.Google Scholar
ʿAjam, Rafīq. Mawsūʿat muṣṭalaḥāt uṣūl al-fiqh ʿinda l-Muslimīn. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān, Nāshirūn, 1998.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
al-Āmidī, ʿAlī b. Abī ʿAlī. al-Iḥkām fī uṣūl al-aḥkām. al-ʿAjūz, Ibrahīm, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2005.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33(124) (1958): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Sullivan, Daniel J., ed. vol. 1. Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . De Anima. Hicks, Robert Drew, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1907.Google Scholar
al-Asadābādī, ʿAbd al-Jabbār. al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawḥīd wa l-ʿadl. Ḥusayn, Ṭāhā, ed. 20 vols. Cairo: Wizārat al-Thaqāfa wa l-Irshād al-Qawmī, n.d. [196–].Google Scholar
Attar, Mariam. Islamic Ethics: Divine Command Theory in Arabo-Islamic Thought. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Austin, Michael W. “Divine Command Theory,” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu/divine-c/.Google Scholar
Baggett, David, and Walls, Jerry L.. Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
al-Bāqillānī, Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib. al-Insāf fīmā yajibu iʿtiqādihi wa-lā yujawwazu l-jahli bihi. Cairo: Maktabat Nashr al-Thaqāfa l-Islāmiyya, 1950.Google Scholar
al-Bāqillānī, Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib. Kitāb al-Tamhīd. McCarthy, Richard Joseph, ed. Beirut: Al-Maktaba al-Sharqiyya, 1957.Google Scholar
al-Bāqillānī, Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib. al-Taqrīb wa l-Irshād “al-Ṣaghīr.” Abū Zunayd, ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd b. ʿAlī, ed. 2nd edn, 3 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1998.Google Scholar
al-Baṣrī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī. Kitāb al-Muʿtamad fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Bakr, Maḥammad and Ḥanafī, Ḥasan, eds. 2 vols. Damascus: al-Maʿhad al-ʿIlmī al-Faransī lil-Dirāsāt al-ʿArabiyya bi-Dimashq, 1964.Google Scholar
al-Bayḍāwī, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿUmar. Nature, Man and God in Medieval Islam: Abd Allah Baydawi’s Text, Tawali Al-Anwar Min Matali Al-Anzar, along with Mahmud Isfahani’s Commentary, Matali Al-Anzar, Sharh Tawali Al-Anwar. Calvelry, E. and Pollock, J., eds. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
al-Bihārī, Muḥibb Allāh b. ʿAbd al-Shakūr, and al-Laknawī, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. Fawātiḥ al-raḥamūt bi-sharḥ musallam al-thubūt. ʿUmar, ʿAbdullāh Maḥmūd Muḥammad, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2002.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Svend. “Questioning Constructionism: Toward an Ethics of Finitude.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 46(1) (2006): 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Bukhārī, ʿAbd al-ʻAzīz b. Aḥmad. Kashf al-asrār ʻan uṣūl Fakhr al-Islām al-Bazdawī. ʿUmar, ʿAbdullāh Maḥmūd Muḥammad, ed. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
Carson, Thomas L. “Divine Will/Divine Command Moral Theories and the Problem of Arbitrariness.” Religious Studies 48(4) (2012): 445–68.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Rudolph. A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality. London: J. and J. Knapton, 1731; reprinted New York, NY: Garland, 1976.Google Scholar
al-Dabūsī, ʿUbayd Allāh b. ʿUmar b. ʿĪsā Taʾsīs al-Naẓar. ʿAlī Yūsuf, Zakariyya, ed. 1st edn. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Zakariyya ʿAlī Yūsuf, 1972.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Eric. “‘Worthy of Worship’: A Catholic Contribution.” In Outka, G. and Reeder, J. Jr., eds. Religion and Morality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1973.Google Scholar
al-Dhahabī, Shams al-Dīn. Siyar aʿlām al-nubalāʾ. ʿAbd al-Maān, Ḥan, ed. Beirut: Dār al-Afkār al-Dawliyya, 2004.Google Scholar
Diagne, Souleymane Bachir. Comment philosopher en Islam. Fenton, MI: The Phoenix Publishing Company, 2008.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. The Theory of Morality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dughaym, Samīḥ. Mawsūʻat muṣṭalaḥāt ʻilm al-kalām al-islāmī. 2 vols. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān Nāshirūn, 1998.Google Scholar
El-Bizri, Nader. “God: Essence and Attributes,” in Winter, T. J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 121–5.Google Scholar
Emon, Anver M. Islamic Natural Law Theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Emon, Anver M. Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: “Dhimmīs” and Others in the Empire of Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen. “Faith and Revelation.” In Wainwright, William J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Farahat, Omar. “A Devotional Theory of Law: Epistemology and Moral Purpose in Early Islamic Jurisprudence,” Journal of Law and Religion 31(1) (2016): 42–69.Google Scholar
Farahat, Omar. “Debating the Imperative Mood in Uṣūl al-Fiqh: Collective Deliberation and Legal Validity,” Oriens 46(1–2) (2018): 159–85.Google Scholar
Farahat, Omar. “Commands as Divine Attributes: Islamic Jurisprudence and the Euthyphro Question” The Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 44, no. 4, December, 581–605.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Aquinas Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. “Reason, Revelation, Universality and Particularity in Ethics,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 53(1) (2008): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, Peter. God without the Supernatural: A Defense of Scientific Theism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. Al-Ghazālī and the Ashʻarite School. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. Texts and Studies on the Development and History of Kalām. Gutas, Dimitri, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate Variorum, 2005.Google Scholar
Frankena, William. “Is Morality Logically Dependent on Religion?” In Outka, Gene H. and Reeder, John P, eds., Religion and Morality; A Collection of Essays. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1973. 300–1.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71(4) (1958): 630–72.Google Scholar
Gensler, Harry. Ethics and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 57–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GhaneaBassiri, Kambiz. “The Epistemological Foundation of Conceptions of Justice in Classical Kalām: A Study of ʿAbd Al-Jabbār’s Al-Mughnī and Ibn Al-Bāqillānī’s Al-Tamhīd.” Journal of Islamic Studies 19.1 (2008): 71–96.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. al-Mankhūl min taʻlīqāt al-uṣūl. Ḥītū, Muḥammad Ḥasan, ed. Damascus, [n.a.], 1970.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. al-Iqtiṣād fī l-iʿtiqād. Muṣṭafā Abū l-ʿIlā, Muḥammad, ed. Cairo: Maktabat al-Jindī, 1972.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. al-Mustaṣfā min ʻilm al-uṣūl, 1st edn. Cairo: Dār al-Baṣāʾir, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. Al-Ghazālī’s Moderation in Belief: al-Iqtiṣād fī al-iʻtiqād. Yaqūb, Aladdin Maḥmūd, tr. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Gleave, Robert. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter. “What Is Intellectual History? A Frankly Partisan Introduction to a Frankly Misunderstood Field,” in: https://sydney.edu.au/intellectual-history/documents/gordon-intellectual-history.pdfGoogle Scholar
Green, Arnold, ed. In Quest of an Islamic Humanism: Arabic and Islamic Studies in Memory of Mohamed Al-Nowaihi. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. “Al-Ghazālī’s Use of ‘Original Human Disposition’ (Fiṭra) and Its Background in the Teachings of Al-Fārābī and Avicenna,” The Muslim World 102(1) (January 1, 2012): 1–32.Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Theology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. An Awareness of What Is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. Malden, MA: PolityPress, 2010.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. and Raz, Joseph, eds. Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. “On the Authoritativeness of Sunni Consensus.” International Journal of Middle East Studies. 18(04) (1986): 427–54.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. “Notes on the Term Qarīna in Islamic Legal Discourse.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 108(3) (1988): 475–80.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Usul Al-Fiqh. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, Transformations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. “On Orientalism, Self-Consciousness and History.” Islamic Law and Society 18(3–4) (2011): 387–439.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hare, J. E. God’s Call: Moral Realism, God’s Commands, and Human Autonomy. Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71(4) (1958): 593–629.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. “Ijmāʿ: An Integrating Force in the Muslim Community.” Islamic Studies 6(4) (1967): 389–406.Google Scholar
Hector, Kevin. Theology without Metaphysics: God, Language, and the Spirit of Recognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Heer, Nicholas, and Ziadeh, Farhat, eds. Islamic Law and Jurisprudence. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar
al-Ḥillī, Abū l-Muẓaffar Ibn al-Muṭahhar al-Ḥasan b. Yūsuf. Maʿārij al-fahm fī sharḥ al-naẓm. al-Ḥillī, ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm, ed. Qom: Dalīl-e Mā, 2006. 79–80.Google Scholar
Honderich, Ted. Morality and Objectivity: A Tribute to J. L. Mackie. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.Google Scholar
Hourani, George. Islamic Rationalism: The Ethics of ʻAbd Al-Jabbār. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hudson, W. D. The Is-Ought Question: A Collection of Papers on the Central Problems in Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. [Waiheke Island]: Floating Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ibn Farḥūn, Ibrahīm b. ʿAlī. al-Dībāj al-mudhahhab fī maʿrifat aʿyān ʿulamāʼ al-madhhab. Abū l-Nūr, Muḥammad al-Aḥmadī, ed. 2 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Turāth li l-Ṭabʿ wa l-Nashr, 1975.Google Scholar
Ibn Kathīr, Ismaʿīl b. ʿUmar. al-Bidāya wa l-nihȳa fī l-Tārīkh. al-Khaymī, Salāḥ, ed. 2nd edn. 21 vols. Damascus: Dār Ibn Kathīr, 2010.Google Scholar
Ibn Khallikān, . Wafayāt al-aʿyān wa-anbāʾ abnāʾ al-zamān mimmā thabata bi l-naql aw al-samāʿ aw athbatahu l-ʿiyān. De Slane, Baron MacGuckin, ed. Paris: Typographie de Firmin Didot Freres, 1838.Google Scholar
Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad b. Mukarram. Lisān al-ʿArab. al-Kabīr, ʿAbdullāh, Hasaballah, Muḥammad, and al-Shazlī, Hāshim, eds. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1984.Google Scholar
Ibn Mattawayh, al-Ḥasan b. Aḥmad. al-Tadhkira fī aḥkām al-jawāhir wa l-aʿrāḍ. 2 vols. Cairo: al-Maʿhad al-ʿIlmī al-Faransī lil-Āthār al-Sharqiyya, 2009.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Murtaḍā, al-Mahdī Aḥmad b. Yaḥyā. Kitāb ṭabaqāt al-muʿtazila. Diwald-Wilzer, Susanna, ed. Beirut: in Kommission bei F. Steiner, 1961.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Qaṣṣār, Abū l-Ḥasan. Muqaddima fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Makhdum, Mustafa, ed. Riyadh: Dār al-Maʿlama lil-Nashr wal-Tawzīʿ, 1999.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Tilimsānī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Muḥammad. Sharḥ al-maʿālim fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub, 1999.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Mohd Radhi, “Immediate Knowledge According to al-Qadi ʿAbd al-Jabbar.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23(1) (2013): 101–15.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sherman A. “Fiction and Formalism: Toward a Functional Analysis of “Usul Al-Fiqh.” In Weiss, Bernard G., ed., Studies in Islamic Legal Theory Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī. Uṣūl al-fiqh: al-musammā bi l-fuṣūl fī l-uṣūl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2000.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. Contingency in a Sacred Law: Legal and Ethical Norms in the Muslim Fiqh. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jeff. “Does Skeptical Theism Lead to Moral Skepticism?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72(2) (2006): 403–17.Google Scholar
al-Jurjānī, ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. al-Taʿrīfāt: muʻjam yashraḥ al-alfāẓ al-muṣṭalaḥ ʿalayhā bayna al-fuqahāʾ wa l-mutakallimīn wa l-nuḥāh wa l-ṣarfiyīn wa l-mufassirīn wa ghayrihim. [n.a.] Cairo: Maṭbaʿat al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1938.Google Scholar
al-Juwaynī, Imām al-Ḥaramayn Abū l-Maʿālī. Kitāb al-irshād ilā qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī uṣūl al-iʿtiqād. Mūsā, Muḥammad Yūsuf and ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd, ʿAlī, ed. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1950.Google Scholar
al-Juwaynī, Imām al-Ḥaramayn Abū l-Maʿālī. al-Burhān fī uṣūl al-fiqh. al-Dīb, ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm, ed. 2 vols. Doha: Jāmiʿat Qaṭar, 1979.Google Scholar
al-Kaʿbī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Aḥmad, Faḍl al-iʿtizāl wa-ṭabaqāt al-muʿtazila. al-Jushamī, Muḥsin and Sayyid, Fuʾād, ed. Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyya lil-Nashr, 1974.Google Scholar
Kahane, Howard, and Cavender, Nancy. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Learning, 2005.Google Scholar
Kant, ImmanuelGroundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Katz, Marion Holmes. Women in the Mosque: A History of Legal Thought and Social Practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kawall, Jason. “Moral Realism and Arbitrariness.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 43(1) (2005): 109–29.Google Scholar
al-Khabbāzī, ʿUmar b. Muḥammad. al-Mughnī fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Baqā, Muḥammad Maẓhar, ed. Mecca: Jāmiʿat Umm al-Qurā, 1983.Google Scholar
al-Kirmāstī, Yūsuf b. Ḥusayn. Zubdat al-wuṣūl ilā ʿumdat al-uṣūl. Ḥajqahlī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, ed. 1st edn. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 2008.Google Scholar
Klein, Peter D. “Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives 33(s13) (1999): 297–325.Google Scholar
Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian. “An (Un)awareness of What Is Missing.” Modern Age 56(1) (2014): 19–27.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “Skepticism about Practical Reason.” The Journal of Philosophy 83(1) (1986): 5–25.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. The Sources of Normativity. O’Neill, Onora, ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
al-Lāmishī, Maḥmūd b. Zayd. Kitāb fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Turki, Abdulhamid, ed. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1995.Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. “The Developed Kalām Tradition.” In Winter, T. J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 77–90.Google Scholar
Loftin, R. Keith. “C. S. Lewis’s Dangerous Idea: A Philosophical Defense of Lewis’s Argument from Reason.” Christian Scholar’s Review 37(3) (2008): 389–91.Google Scholar
Lowry, Joseph E. Early Islamic Legal Theory: The Risāla of Muḥammad Ibn Idrīs Al-Shāfiʻī. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. “Social Structures and Their Threats to Moral Agency.” Philosophy 74(289) (1999): 311–29.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilfred and Schmidtke, Sabine. “The Shīʿite and Khārijite Contribution to Pre-Ashʿarite Kalām.” In Morewedge, Parviz, ed. Islamic Philosophical Theology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilfred and Schmidtke, Sabine. Rational Theology in Interfaith Communication: Abu-I-Husayn Al-Basri’s Mu’tazili Theology among the Karaites in the Fatimid Age. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. “The Juridical Theology of Shâfi’î: Origins and Significance of Uṣûl Al-Fiqh.” Studia Islamica (59) (1984): 5–47.Google Scholar
Makhlūf, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. Shajarat al-nūr al-zakiyya fī ṭabaqāt al-mālikiyya. Makhlūf, Muḥammad, ed. Cairo: Al-Maṭbaʿa al-Salafiyya, 1930.Google Scholar
al-Malāhimī, Rukn al-Dīn. Kitāb al-Muʿtamad fī usūl al-dīn. McDermott, Martin and Madelung, Wilferd, eds. London: al-Hoda, 1991.Google Scholar
Mankadīm, Aḥmad. Sharḥ al-uṣūl al-khamsa. ʻUthmān, ʻAbd al-Karīm, ed. Cairo: Maktabat Wahba, 1965.Google Scholar
Meier, Heinrich. Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Messick, Brinkley. The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1993.Google Scholar
Michot, Yahya. “Revelation.” In O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine, eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 180–96.Google Scholar
Morewedge, Parviz. Islamic Philosophical Theology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy; The Case of Wagner; Kaufmann, Walter, ed. and tr. New York, NY: Vintage Books Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Kaufmann, Walter, tr. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. Nauckhoff, Josefine, tr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy, and Sandis, Constantine, eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Opwis, Felicitas. Maṣlaḥa and the Purpose of the Law: Islamic Discourse on Legal Change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th Century. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Outka, Gene H., and Reeder, John P.. Religion and Morality: A Collection of Essays. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. “Epistemic Probability and Evil.” In Howard-Snyder, Daniel, ed., The Evidential Argument from Evil. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 1996. 69–96.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, ed. The Ontological Argument: From St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers. London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Plato, . Five Dialogues. Cooper, John M., ed., Grube, G. M. A., tr. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub. Co., 2002.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. Divine Commands and Moral Requirements. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip L. “Divine Command Theories of Ethics.” In Borchert, Donald M., ed., Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edn, vol. 3. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference, 2006, 93–4.Google Scholar
al-Qurashī, ʿAbd al-Qādir b. Muḥammad. al-Jawāhir al-muḍiyya fī ṭabaqāt al-ḥanafiyya. al-Ḥulw, ʿAbd al-Fattāh Muḥammad, ed. 2nd edn. Cairo: Dār Hajr, 1993.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Promises and Obligations.” In Hacker, P. M. S., and Raz, J., eds. Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad b.ʿUmar. al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿilm al-uṣūl. ʿAṭā, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Qādir, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1999.Google Scholar
Reinhart, A. Kevin. “Islamic Law as Islamic Ethics.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 11(2) (1983): 186–203.Google Scholar
Reinhart, A. Kevin. Before Revelation: The Boundaries of Muslim Moral Thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Reinhart, A. Kevin. “‘Like the Difference Between Heaven and Earth’: Ḥanafī and Shāfiʿī Distinction of Farḍ and Wājib in Theology and Uṣūl.” In Weiss, Bernard G. ed., Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2002. 205–34.Google Scholar
Renard, John, ed. Islamic Theological Themes: A Primary Source Reader. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1981.Google Scholar
Rottenberg, Annette T., and Winchell, Donna Haisty. The Structure of Argument. New York, NY: Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Rowe, William, The Cosmological Argument. New York, NY: Fordam University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Ulrich. “Occasionalism.” In Schmidtke, Sabine, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 347–63.Google Scholar
Sadeghi, Behnam. The Logic of Law-Making in Islam: Women and Prayer in the Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
al-Samʿānī, Abū l-Muẓaffar. Qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī l-uṣūl. Shafiʿī, Muḥammad Ḥasan Ismaʿīl, ed. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
al-Samarqandī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Mīzān al-uṣūl fī natāʾij al-ʿuqūl fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Saʿdī, ʿAbd al-Malik ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, ed. Baghdad: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa l-Shuʾūn al-Dīniyya, 1987.Google Scholar
al-Sarakhsī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī. al-Afghānī, Abū l-Wafā, ed. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1993.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick F. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schmidke, Sabine, Sklare, David, and Adang, Camilla, eds. A Common Rationality: Muʿtazilism in Islam and Judaism. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag in Kommission, 2007.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. “How to Derive ‘Ought’ from ‘Is’.” In Hudson, W. D., ed., The Is-Ought Question: A Collection of Papers on the Central Problems in Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
al-Shahrastānī, Abū al-Fatḥ Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm. al-Milal wa l-niḥal. Muḥammad, Aḥmad Fahmī, ed. 3 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1992.Google Scholar
Shaw, Aeddan. “The Prescriptivist Account of the Normativity of Meaning Debate.” In Stelmach, Jerzy, Brożek, Bartosz, and Hohol, Mateusz, eds., The Many Faces of Normativity. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013. 177–89.Google Scholar
al-Shīrāzī, Abū Isḥāq. al-Lumaʿ fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Shirāzī, Ṣadr al-Dīn (Mulla Ṣadrā), “Principle, Concerning His Speech.” Morris, James W., tr. In Renard, John, ed., Islamic Theological Themes: A Primary Source Reader. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2014, 207–8.Google Scholar
Sībawayh, ʿAmr b. ʿUthmān. Kitāb Sībawayh. Derenbourg, Hartwig, ed. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1881.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C., and Williams, Bernard. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Robert J. Evidence for God from Physics and Philosophy: Extending the Legacy of Monsignor Georges Lemaître and St. Thomas Aquinas. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Stelmach, Jerzy, Brożek, Bartosz, and Hohol, Mateusz, eds., The Many Faces of Normativity. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Stone, Jerome. Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2008.Google Scholar
al-Subkī, Tāj al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb b. ʿAlī. Ṭabaqāt al-Shāfiʿiyya al-kubrā. al-Tanahī, Maḥmūd Muḥammad and al-Ḥulw, ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ Muḥammad, eds. Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyya, 1918.Google Scholar
al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. al-Maṭāliʿ al-saʿīda fī sharḥ al-farīda. Ḥusayn, Nabhān Yāsīn, ed. Baghdad: Dār al-Rīsāla, 1977.Google Scholar
al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. al-Itqān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. al-Qurʾāniyya, Markaz al-Dirāsāt, ed. 3rd edn. Medina: Majmaʻ al-Malik Fahd li-Ṭibāʿat al-Maṣḥaf al-Sharīf, 2011.Google Scholar
al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn, et al. al-Shurūḥ wa l-ḥawāshī ʿalā l-ʿaqāʾid al-Nasafīyya li-ahl al-sunna wa l-jamāʿa al-Ashāʿira wa l-Māturīdīyya. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2013.Google Scholar
al-Tahānawī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī. Kashshāf iṣṭilāḥāt al-funūn wa l-ʿulūm al-Islāmiyya. 3 vols. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1980.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Usmandī, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd. Badhl al-naẓar fī l-uṣūl. ʿAbd al-Barr, Muḥammad Zakī, ed. Cairo: Maktabat Dār al-Turāth, 1992.Google Scholar
Valdés, Mario J. A Ricœur Reader Reflection and Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Moral Agents and Their Deserts: The Character of Mu’tazilite Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Ibn Taymiyya’s Theological Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Vishanoff, David R. The Formation of Islamic Hermeneutics: How Sunni Legal Theorists Imagined a Revealed Law. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society, 2011.Google Scholar
Wakin, Jeanette. “Interpretation of Divine Command in the Jurisprudence of Muwaffaq al-Dīn Ibn Qudāmah.” In Heer, Nicholas, ed., Islamic Law and Jurisprudence. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990, 35.Google Scholar
Walbridge, John. God and Logic in Islam: The Caliphate of Reason. Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University, 2004.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernard G., The Search for God’s Law: Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf Al-Din Al-Amidi. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward. “Utilitarianism and the Divine Command Theory.” American Philosophical Quarterly 21(4) (1984): 311–18.Google Scholar
Wierenga, Edward. The Nature of God: An Inquiry into Divine Attributes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Truth & Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Winter, T. J. The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. The Philosophy of the Kalam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim That God Speaks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Zysow, Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Atlanta, GA: Lockwood Press, 2013.Google Scholar