Book contents
- The Measure of Homer
- Frontispiece
- The Measure of Homer
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Placing Homer
- Chapter 2 Homer and the Divine
- Chapter 3 The Golden Verses
- Chapter 4 Homer among the Scholars
- Chapter 5 The Pleasures of Song
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages Discussed
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
Book contents
- The Measure of Homer
- Frontispiece
- The Measure of Homer
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Placing Homer
- Chapter 2 Homer and the Divine
- Chapter 3 The Golden Verses
- Chapter 4 Homer among the Scholars
- Chapter 5 The Pleasures of Song
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages Discussed
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Measure of HomerThe Ancient Reception of the <I>Iliad</I> and the <I>Odyssey</I>, pp. 232 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Arnim, H. von 1891. ‘Entstehung und Anordnung der Schriftensammlung Dios von Prusa’ Hermes 26: 366–407Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1992. ‘An Epicurean survey of poetic theories (Philodemus On Poems 5, Cols. 26–36)’ Classical Quarterly 42: 395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asper, M. 1997. Onomata Allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Bäbler, B. 2002. ‘“Long-haired Greeks in trousers”: Olbia and Dio Chrysostom (Or. 36, ‘Borystheniticus’)’ Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 8: 311–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäbler, B. 2007. ‘Dio Chrysostom’s construction of Olbia’ in Braund, and Kryzhitsky, 2007: 145–60Google Scholar
Bernard, P., Pinault, G. and Rougemont, G. 2004. ‘Deux nouvelles inscriptions de l’Asie centrale’ Journal des Savants 2004: 227–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besios, M., Tzifopoulos, Y. Z. and Kotsonas, A. eds. 2012. ΜΕΘΩΝΗ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΣ i, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
Bielohlawek, K. 1940. ‘Gastmahls- und Symposionslehren bei griechischen Dichtern’ Wiener Studien 58: 11–30Google Scholar
Billault, A. 2005. ‘Dion Chrysostome, Protagoras et Platon dans le discours xxxvi, Borysthenitique’ Revue des Études Anciennes 107: 727–43Google Scholar
Bost-Pouderon, C. 2008. ‘Ethnographie et utopie chez Dion Chrysostome (Or. 35, 18–22 et Or. 7, 1–80)’ Kentron 24: 105–22Google Scholar
Braund, D. 1997. ‘Greeks and barbarians: the Black Sea region and Hellenism under the early Empire’ in Alcock, S. ed., The Early Roman Empire in the East (Oxford) 121–36Google Scholar
Braund, D. 2007. ‘Greater Olbia: ethnic, religious, economic, and political interactions in the region of Olbia, c. 600–100 bc’ in Braund and Kryzhitsky 2007: 37–77Google Scholar
Braund, D. and Hall, E. 2014. ‘Theatre in the fourth-century Black Sea region’ in Csapo, E., Goette, H. R., Green, J. R. and Wilson, P. eds., Greek Theatre in the Fourth Century bc (Berlin) 371–90Google Scholar
Braund, D. and Kryzhitsky, S. D. eds. 2007. Classical Olbia and the Scythian World from the Sixth Century bc to the Second Century ad, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. and Most, G. W. 2003. Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1963. Horace on Poetry: The Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1972. ‘Ennius and the Hellenistic worship of Homer’ American Journal of Philology 93: 547–67Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1973. ‘Aspects of the social thought of Dio Chrysostom and of the Stoics’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 19: 9–34Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2001. The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Capra, A. 2014. Plato’s Four Muses: The Phaedrus and the Poetics of Philosophy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Cazzato, V. 2016. ‘Symposia en plein air in Alcaeus and others’ in Cazzato, , Obbink, and Prodi, 2016: 184–206Google Scholar
Cazzato, V., Obbink, D. and Prodi, E. E. eds. 2016. The Cup of Song: Studies on Poetry and the Symposium, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Cerri, G. 1976. ‘Frammento di teoria musicale e di ideologia simposiale in un distico di Teognide (v. 1041sg.): il ruolo paradossale dell’auleta. La fonte probabile di G. Pascoli, Solon 13–15’ Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 22: 25–38Google Scholar
Cesaretti, P. 1991. Allegoristi di Omero a Bisanzio. Ricerche ermeneutiche (xi–xii secolo), MilanGoogle Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2010. ‘“The best of Homer”: Homeric texts, performances and images in the Hellenistic world and beyond. The contribution of inscriptions’ in Walter-Karydi, E. ed., Myths, Texts, Images: Homeric Epics and Ancient Greek Art (Ithaca, NY) 257–78Google Scholar
Christian, T. 2015. Gebildete Steine: Zur Rezeption literarischer Techniken in den Versinschriften seit dem Hellenismus, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. 2004. Archilochos Heros: The Cult of Poets in the Greek Polis, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2016. ‘How to construct a sympotic space with words’ in Cazzato, V. and Lardinois, A. eds., The Look of Lyric: Greek Song and the Visual (Leiden) 204–16Google Scholar
Clay, J. S., Malkin, I. and Tzifopoulos, Y. Z. eds. 2017. Panhellenes at Methone, BerlinGoogle Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2004. ‘Textual fluctuation and cosmic streams: Ocean and Acheloios’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 124: 16–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danek, G. 2009. ‘Autopsie und Fiktionalität: Der Euboikos des Dion Chrysostomos’ in Karamalengou, E. and Makrygianni, E. eds., Ἀντιφίλησις: Studies on Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Literature and Culture in Honour of John-Theophanes A. Papademetriou (Stuttgart) 417–23Google Scholar
de Jong, I. 1991. ‘Gynaikeion ethos: misogyny in the Homeric scholia’ Eranos 89: 13–24Google Scholar
de Jong, I. 2004. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, 2nd edn, LondonGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. 2005. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the method of metathesis’ Classical Quarterly 55: 463–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. forthcoming. ‘Dionysius and Horace: composition in Augustan Rome’ in de Jonge, and Hunter, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, C. and Hunter, R. forthcoming. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Rhetoric, Criticism, and Historiography in Augustan Rome, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Dettori, E. 1996. ‘Testi “orfici” dalla Magna Grecia al Mar Nero’ Parola del Passato 51: 292–310Google Scholar
Doherty, L. E. 1995. ‘Sirens, Muses, and female narrators in the Odyssey’ in Cohen, B. ed., The Distaff Side: Representing the Female in Homer’s Odyssey (New York) 81–92Google Scholar
Durbec, Y. and Trajber, F. eds. 2017. Traditions épiques et poésie épigrammatique, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. eds. 2015. The Greek Epic Cycle and its Ancient Reception, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Fernández Delgado, J. A. 2000. ‘Le Gryllus, une éthopée parodique’ in Van Der Stockt, L. ed., Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch (Louvain/Namur) 171–81Google Scholar
Ford, A. 1999. ‘Odysseus after dinner: Od. 9.2–11 and the traditions of sympotic song’ in Kazazis, J. N. and Rengakos, A. eds., Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and its Legacy in Honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis (Stuttgart) 109–23Google Scholar
Fournet, J.-L. 2012. ‘Homère et les papyrus non littéraires. Le poète dans le contexte de ses lecteurs’ in Bastianini, and Casanova, 2012: 125–57Google Scholar
Garulli, V. 2014. ‘Stones as books: the layout of Hellenistic inscribed poems’ in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. eds., Hellenistic Poetry in Context (Leuven) 125–69Google Scholar
Garulli, V. 2017. ‘Les derivés du nom d’Homère dans la tradition épigrammatique grecque’ in Durbec, and Trajber, 2017: 141–56Google Scholar
Ghali-Kahil, L. 1955. Les enlèvements et le retour d’Hélène dans les textes et les documents figurés, ParisGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. 1984. ‘The ethos/pathos distinction in rhetorical and literary criticism’ Classical Quarterly 34: 149–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2001b. ‘The erotic eye: visual stimulation and cultural conflict’ in Goldhill, 2001a: 154–94Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Greenwood, E. eds. 2007. Homer in the Twentieth Century: Between World Literature and the Western Canon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1977. ‘The Epic Cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 97: 39–53Google Scholar
Haft, A. J. 1992. ‘τὰ δὴ νῦν πάντα τελεῖται: prophecy and recollection in the assemblies of Iliad 2 and Odyssey 2’ Arethusa 25: 223–40Google Scholar
Hall, E. 2008. The Return of Ulysses: A Cultural History of Homer’s Odyssey, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2005. ‘Learning from suffering: ancient responses to tragedy’ in Gregory, J. ed., A Companion to Greek Tragedy (Malden, MA) 394–412Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2007. ‘The life and death journey of the soul: interpreting the Myth of Er’ in Ferrari, G. R. F. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic (Cambridge) 445–73Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1985. ‘Imago mundi: cosmological and ideological aspects of the shield of Achilles’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 11–31Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 2007. ‘Polyphony or Babel? Hosidius Geta’s Medea and the poetics of the cento’ in Swain, S., Harrison, S. and Elsner, J. eds., Severan Culture (Cambridge) 168–76Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hatzfeld, J. 1927. ‘Inscriptions de Panamara’ Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 51: 57–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E. A. 1966. ‘Pre-literacy and the Pre-Socratics’ Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 13: 44–67Google Scholar
Herchenroeder, L. 2008. ‘Τί γὰρ τοῦτο πρὸς τὸν λόγον; Plutarch’s Gryllus and the so-called Grylloi’ American Journal of Philology 129: 347–79Google Scholar
Hess, K. 1960. Der Agon zwischen Homer und Hesiod, seine Entstehung und kulturgeschichtliche Stellung, WinterthurGoogle Scholar
Hillgruber, M. 1994. Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero, Teil 1, Stuttgart/LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Hillgruber, M. 1999. Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero, Teil 2, Stuttgart/LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Hillgruber, M. 2000. ‘Homer im Dienste des Mimus: Zur künstlerischen Eigenart der Homeristen’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 132: 63–72Google Scholar
Hollis, A. 2011. ‘Greek letters from Hellenistic Bactria’ in Obbink, and Rutherford, 2011: 104–18Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1996. ‘Callimachus swings (frr. 178 and 43 Pf.)’ Ramus 25: 17–26 [= Hunter 2008: 278–89]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 2006b. ‘Plato’s Symposium and the traditions of ancient fiction’ in Lesher, J., Nails, D. and Sheffield, F. eds., Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception (Washington, DC) 295–312 [= Hunter 2008: 845–66]Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2008. On Coming After: Studies in Post-Classical Greek Literature and its Reception, Berlin/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 2009a. ‘The Trojan Oration of Dio Chrysostom and ancient Homeric criticism’ in Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A. eds., Narratology and Interpretation (Berlin/New York) 43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 2009c. ‘The curious incident …: polypragmosyne and the ancient novel’ in Paschalis, M. et al. eds., Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel (Groningen) 51–63 [= Hunter 2008: 884–96]Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2010. ‘Language and interpretation in Greek epigram’ in Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. eds., Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram (Cambridge) 265–88Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2011. ‘The gods of Callimachus’ in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. eds., Brill’s Companion to Callimachus (Leiden/Boston) 245–63Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. 2014b. ‘“Where do I begin?” An Odyssean narrative strategy and its afterlife’ in Cairns, D. and Scodel, R. eds., Defining Greek Narrative (Edinburgh) 137–55Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2014c. ‘Horace’s other Ars Poetica: Epistles 1.2 and ancient Homeric criticism’ Materiali e Discussioni 72: 19–41Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2015. ‘The rhetorical criticism of Homer’ in Montanari, , Matthaios, and Rengakos, 2015: 673–705Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2016a. ‘“Palaephatus”, Strabo and the boundaries of myth’ Classical Philology 111: 245–61Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2016b. ‘The Hippias Minor and the traditions of Homeric criticism’ Cambridge Classical Journal 62: 85–107Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2017a. ‘Eustathian moments’ in Pontani, F., Katsaros, V. and Sarris, V. eds., Reading Eustathius of Thessalonike (Berlin) 9–75Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2017b. ‘Hellenistic poetry and the archaeology of leisure’ in Fiorucci, F. ed., Muße, Otium, σχολή in den Gattungen der antiken Literatur (Freiburg) 21–36Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2017c. ‘Autobiography as literary history: Dio Chrysostom, On exile’ in Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A. eds., Griechische Literaturgeschichtsschreibung (Berlin) 248–70Google Scholar
Hupe, J. ed. 2006. Der Achilles-Kult im nördlichen Schwarzmeerraum vom Beginn der griechischen Kolonisation bis in die römische Kaiserzeit, RahdenGoogle Scholar
Jansen, G. C. M. et al. eds. 2011. Roman Toilets: Their Archaeology and Cultural History, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2015. ‘The earthquake of 26 bce in decrees of Mytilene and Chios’ Chiron 45: 101–22Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. 2006. ‘Perniciosa ista dulcedo litterarum: the perils of charming literature in Paulinus of Nola’ Maia 58: 53–67Google Scholar
Karanika, A. 2011. ‘Homer the prophet: Homeric verses and divination in the Homeromanteion’ in Lardinois, A., Blok, J. H. and van der Poel, M. G. M. eds., Sacred Words: Orality, Literacy and Religion (Leiden) 255–77Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. 2011. ‘Philosophy in Plutarch’s Table Talk: in jest or earnest?’ in Klotz, and Oikonomopoulou, 2011: 77–104Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2008. ‘Performance and rivalry: Homer, Odysseus, Hesiod’ in Revermann, M. and Wilson, P. eds., Performance, Iconography, Reception (Oxford) 177–203Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1995. ‘“Dear Helen … ”: the pithanotate prophasis?’ Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar 8: 187–207Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2008. ‘Dio of Prusa, Or. 61, Chryseis, or reading Homeric silence’ Classical Quarterly 58: 601–21Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2010. Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Klauser, T. 1963. ‘Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der christlichen Kunst vi: Das Sirenenabenteuer des Odysseus – ein Motiv der christlichen Grabkunst?’ Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 6: 71–100Google Scholar
Klotz, F. 2011. ‘Imagining the past: Plutarch’s play with time’ in Klotz, and Oikonomopoulou, 2011: 161–78Google Scholar
König, J. 2012. Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Culture, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Korenjak, M. and Rollinger, R. 2001. ‘καὶ τόδε Φωκυλίδεω? “Phokylides” und der Fall Ninives’ Philologus 145: 195–202Google Scholar
Landfester, U. 2010. ‘Immer anders: Goethes Homer’ in Arnold, H. L. ed., Homer und die deutsche Literatur (Munich) 123–47Google Scholar
Langdon, M. 1976. A Sanctuary of Zeus on Mount Hymettos (Hesperia Suppl. xvi), Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Lavater, J. C. 1775. Physiognomische Fragmente, zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntniss und Menschenliebe. Vol. i, Leipzig/WinterthurGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, G. et al. 2012. Armut – Arbeit – Menschenwürde: Die euböische Rede des Dion von Prusa, TübingenGoogle Scholar
Leigh, M. 2013. From Polypragmon to Curiosus: Ancient Concepts of Curious and Meddlesome Behaviour, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1973. ‘Die “theologia tripertita” in Forschung und Bezeugung’ Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt i 4 (Berlin) 63–115Google Scholar
Lowe, N. J. 2000. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lührs, D. 1992. Untersuchungen zu den Athetesen Aristarchs in der Ilias und zu ihrer Behandlung im Corpus der exegetischen Scholien, HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Luzzatto, M. T. 1983. Tragedia greca e cultura ellenistica. L’Or. lii di Dione di Prusa, BolognaGoogle Scholar
McGill, S. 2005. Virgil Recomposed: The Mythological and Secular Centos in Antiquity, OxfordGoogle Scholar
McNamee, K. 1981. ‘Aristarchus and “Everyman’s” Homer’ Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 22: 247–55Google Scholar
Mairs, R. 2013. ‘Sopha grammata: acrostichs in Greek and Latin inscriptions from Arachosia, Nubia and Libya’ in Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D. and Szymanski, M. eds., The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry (Berlin) 279–306Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. 1997–2000. Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Matthaios, S. 1999. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre, GöttingenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minon, S. et al. 2012. Dion de Pruse, Ilion n’a pas été prise. Discours ‘Troyen’ 11, ParisGoogle Scholar
Mirto, M. S. 2016. ‘“Rightly does Aphrodite’s name begin with aphrosune”: gods and men between wisdom and folly’ in Kyriakou, P. and Rengakos, A. eds., Wisdom and Folly in Euripides (Berlin) 45–63Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1995. ‘Dio Chrysostom, Greece, and Rome’ in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. eds., Ethics and Rhetoric (Oxford) 177–92Google Scholar
Moles, J. 2005. ‘The thirteenth oration of Dio Chrysostom: complexity and simplicity, rhetoric and moralism, literature and life’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 125: 112–38Google Scholar
Montana, F. 2015. ‘Hellenistic scholarship’ in Montanari, , Matthaios, and Rengakos, 2015: 60–183Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1988. I frammenti dei grammatici Agathokles, Hellanikos, Ptolemaios Epithetes, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. eds., 2015. Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Mossman, J. 1997. ‘Plutarch’s Dinner of the Seven Wise Men and its place in symposion literature’ in Mossman, J. ed., Plutarch and his Intellectual World (London) 119–41Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1989a. ‘The second Homeric renaissance: allegoresis and genius in early modern poetics’ in Murray, P. ed., Genius: The History of an Idea (Oxford) 54–75Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1989b. ‘The stranger’s stratagem: self-disclosure and self-sufficiency in Greek culture’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 109: 114–33Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2016. ‘Allegoresis and etymology’ in Grafton, A. and Most, G. W. eds., Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices (Cambridge) 52–74Google Scholar
Mouterde, R. and Mondésert, C. 1957. ‘Deux inscriptions grecques de Hama’ Syria 34: 278–87Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1983. ‘The Greek symposion in history’ in Gabba, E. ed., Tria Corda. Scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigliano (Como) 257–72Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2008. ‘The Odyssey as performance poetry’ in Revermann, M. and Wilson, P. eds., Performance, Iconography, Reception (Oxford) 161–76Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2016. ‘The symposium between east and west’ in Cazzato, , Obbink, and Prodi, 2016: 17–27Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 2000. ‘Homerphilologie auf der Insel der Seligen: Lukian, VH ii 20’ in Reichel, M. and Rengakos, A. eds., Epea Pteroenta: Beiträge zur Homerforschung (Stuttgart) 151–62Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. ed. 2003. Dion von Prusa: Menschliche Gemeinschaft und göttliche Ordnung, die Borysthenes-Rede, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Nickau, K. 1977. Untersuchungen zur textkritischen Methode des Zenodotos von Ephesos, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Niehoff, M. R. ed. 2012. Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1993. ‘Poetry and the passions: two Stoic views’ in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. eds., Passions & Perceptions (Cambridge) 97–149Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, J. 2002. ‘Παίζω ἢ χέζω? A contextual approach to pessoi (gaming pieces, counters, or convenient wipes?)’ Hesperia 71: 423–7Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2009. ‘Aeschylus’ gods: drama, cult, theology’ in Hernández, A.-C. ed., Eschyle à l’aube du théâtre occidental (Vandoeuvres-Geneva) 127–64Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 1970. ‘A school-book from the Sayce collection’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 6: 133–49Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. 2012. ‘Homer: papyri and performance’ in Bastianini, and Casanova, 2012: 17–27Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. 2016 . ‘Archaic funerary epigram and Hector’s imagined epitymbia’ in Efstathiou, A. and Karamanou, I. eds., Homeric Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts (Berlin) 45–58Google Scholar
Petrovic, I. 2006. ‘Delusions of grandeur: Homer, Zeus and the Telchines in Callimachus’ Reply (Aitia Fr. 1) and Iambus 6’ Antike und Abendland 52: 16–41Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2000. ‘Il proemio al Commento all’Odissea di Eustazio di Tessalonica’ Bollettino dei Classici 21: 5–58Google Scholar
Pouderon, B. 2003. ‘Hélène et Ulysse comme deux âmes en peine. Une symbolique gnostique, platonicienne ou orphico-pythagoricienne’ Revue des Études Grecques 116: 132–51Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. 2005 . ‘Gibt es eine ägyptische Homer-Rezeption?’ in Luther, A. ed., Odyssee-Rezeptionen (Frankfurt) 55–72Google Scholar
Renberg, G. H. 2017. ‘Homeric verses and the prevention of plague? A new inscription from Roman Termessos and its religious context’ in Coleman, K. ed., Albert’s Anthology (Cambridge, MA) 165–71Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. 2003. ‘Aristarchus and the Hellenistic poets’ Seminari Romani di Cultura Greca 3: 325–35Google Scholar
Repath, I. D. 2005. ‘Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Cleitophon: what happened next?’ Classical Quarterly 55: 250–65Google Scholar
Reuter, D. 1932. ‘Untersuchungen zum Euboikos des Dion von Prusa’, Dissertation, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1975. ‘Homeric professors in the age of the sophists’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 21: 65–81Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1980. ‘Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad: a sketch’ Classical Quarterly 30: 265–87Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1981. ‘The contest of Homer and Hesiod’ Classical Quarterly 31: 1–10Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2012 . ‘Timocles fr. 6 K-A and the parody of Greek literary theory’ in Marshall, C. W. and Kovacs, G. eds., No Laughing Matter. Studies in Athenian Comedy (London) 177–86Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 2018. The Language of Ruins: Greek and Latin Inscriptions on the Memnon Colossus, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. 1986. ‘The philosophy of the Odyssey’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 145–62Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D.M. 1970. ‘Aristarchus and ΟΜΗΡΟΣ ΦΙΛΟΤΕΧΝΟΣ: some fundamental ideas of Aristarchus on Homer as a poet’ Mnemosyne 23: 162–78Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2009. ‘Theory into practice: Aristotelian principles in Aristarchean philology’ Classical Philology 104: 279–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. 2012. ‘The ambiguity of signs: critical σημεῖα from Zenodotus to Origen’ in Niehoff, 2012: 87–112Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1976. Die Erklärungen zum Weltbild Homers und zur Kultur der Heroenzeit in den bT-Scholien zur Ilias, MunichGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, T. 1997. Bildung und Macht: Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit, MunichGoogle Scholar
Schwabl, H. 1976. ‘Zeus nickt (zu Ilias 1, 524–530 und seiner Nachwirkung)’ Wiener Studien 89: 22–30Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 1992. ‘Inscription, absence and memory: epic and early epitaph’ Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 10: 57–76Google Scholar
Scopello, M. 1977. ‘Les citations d’Homère dans le traité de L’Exégèse de l’âme’ in Krause, M. ed., Gnosis and Gnosticism: Papers Read at the Seventh International Conference on Patristic Studies (Leiden) 3–12Google Scholar
Sheets, G. A. 1981. ‘The dialect gloss, Hellenistic poetics, and Livius Andronicus’ American Journal of Philology 102: 58–78Google Scholar
Skiadas, A. D. 1972. ‘ΕΠΙ ΤΥΜΒΩΙ: Ein Beitrag zur Interpretation der griechischen metrischen Grabinschriften’ in Pfohl, G. ed., Inschriften der Griechen (Darmstadt) 59–84Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1976. ‘Symposium at sea’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 80: 161–70Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1981. ‘Peace, the symposium and the poet’ Illinois Classical Studies 6: 205–14Google Scholar
Spivey, N. 2016. ‘Homer and the sculptors’ in Bintliff, J. and Rutter, K. eds., The Archaeology of Homer: Studies in Honour of Anthony Snodgrass (Edinburgh) 113–51Google Scholar
Steiner, G. 1967. ‘Homer and the scholars’ in Language and Silence: Essays 1958–1966 (London) 197–213Google Scholar
Stevens, A. 2002. ‘Telling Presences: Narrating Divine Epiphany in Homer and Beyond’, Dissertation, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Stroh, W. 1981. ‘Tröstende Musen: zur literarhistorischen Stellung und Bedeutung von Ovids Exilgedichten’ Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 31.4 (Berlin) 2638–84Google Scholar
Taplin, O. 1986. ‘Homer’s use of Achilles’ earlier campaigns in the Iliad’ in Boardman, J. and Vaphopoulou-Richardson, C. E. eds., Chios: A Conference at the Homereion in Chios 1984 (Oxford) 15–19Google Scholar
Tecusan, M. 1990. ‘Logos sympotikos: patterns of the irrational in philosophical drinking: Plato outside the Symposium’ in Murray, 1990: 238–60Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1998. ‘“Melodious tears”: sepulchral epigram and generic mobility’ in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. eds., Genre in Hellenistic Poetry (Groningen) 205–23Google Scholar
Tilg, S. 2010. Chariton of Aphrodisias and the Invention of the Greek Love Novel, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Trapp, M. B. 1990. ‘Plato’s Phaedrus in second-century Greek literature’ in Russell, D. A. ed., Antonine Literature (Oxford) 141–73Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. 2000. ‘Plato in Dio’ in Swain, S. ed., Dio Chrysostom: Politics, Letters, and Philosophy (Oxford) 213–39Google Scholar
Treu, K. 1961. ‘Zur Borysthenitica des Dion Chrysostomos’ in Irmscher, J. and Schelow, D. B. eds., Griechische Städte und einheimische Völker des Schwarzmeergebietes (Berlin) 137–54Google Scholar
Usher, M. D. 1997. ‘Prolegomenon to the Homeric centos’ American Journal of Philology 118: 305–21Google Scholar
Wallace, S. 2016. ‘Greek culture in Afghanistan and India: old evidence and new discoveries’ Greece & Rome 63: 205–26Google Scholar
Warner, M. 1998. ‘The enchantments of Circe: Odysseus’ refusal, Gryllus’ choice’ in Boitani, and Ambrosini, 1998: 135–52Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2010. ‘Between poetry and rhetoric: Libanios’ use of Homeric subjects in his progymnasmata’ Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 95: 131–52Google Scholar
Wecowski, M. 2002. ‘Homer and the origins of the symposion’ in Montanari, F. ed., Omero tremila anni dopo (Rome) 625–37Google Scholar
Wedner, S. 1994. Tradition und Wandel im allegorischen Verständnis des Sirenenmythos, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. 1995. ‘“Longinus” and the grandeur of God’ in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. eds., Ethics and Rhetoric (Oxford) 335–42Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2001b. ‘The fragmentary Homeric Hymn to Dionysus’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 134: 1–11Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2017. ‘Aristophanes of Byzantium’s text of Homer’ Classical Philology 112: 20–44Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. ed. 2010. Local Knowledge and Microidentities in the Imperial Greek World, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2011. Narrative and Identity in the Ancient Greek Novel, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiater, N. 2011. The Ideology of Classicism: Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, K. W. 2012. New Epigrams of Palladas: A Fragmentary Papyrus Codex (P.CtYBR inv. 4000), Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
Willcock, M. M. 1977. ‘Ad hoc invention in the Iliad’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 81: 41–53Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J. 1755. Gedancken über die Nachahmung der griechischen Wercke in der Mahlerey und Bildhauer-Kunst, FriedrichstadtGoogle Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J. 1756. Erläuterung der Gedanken von der Nachahmung der griechischen Werke in der Malerey und Bildhauerkunst; und Beantwortung des Sendschreibens über diese Gedanken, Dresden/LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1985. Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius’s The Golden Ass, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar