Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:47:09.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Seventeen - Rewilding and the risk of creating new, unwanted ecological interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

Nathalie Pettorelli
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Sarah M. Durant
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Johan T. du Toit
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Rewilding , pp. 355 - 374
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo, P., Farfán, M.A., Márquez, A.L., Delibes-Mateos, M., Real, R., and Vargas, J.M. (2011). Past, present and future of wild ungulates in relation to changes in land use. Landscape Ecology, 26, 1931.Google Scholar
Allen, B.L., and Fleming, P.J.S. (2012). Reintroducing the dingo: the risk of dingo predation to threatened vertebrates of western New South Wales. Wildlife Research, 39, 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J.K., and Whitham, T.G. (2007). Biodiversity is related to indirect interactions among species of large effect. In Ohgushi, T., Craig, T.P., and Price, P.W. (Eds.), Ecological communities: plant mediation in indirect interaction webs (pp. 306328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C.M., Gordon, A., and Bode, M. (2016). Ensemble ecosystem modeling for predicting ecosystem response to predator reintroduction. Conservation Biology, 2, 376384.Google Scholar
Bakker, E.S., Gill, J.L., Johnson, C.N., et al. (2016). Combining paleo-data and modern exclosure experiments to assess the impact of megafauna extinctions on woody vegetation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 847855.Google Scholar
Barbosa, A.M., Thode, G., Real, R., Feliu, C., and Vargas, J.M. (2012). Phylogeographic triangulation: using predator–prey–parasite interactions to infer population history from partial genetic information. PLoS ONE, 7, e50877.Google Scholar
Barkai, A., and McQuaid, C. (1988). Predator–prey role reversal in a marine benthic ecosystem. Science, 242, 6264.Google Scholar
Barnosky, A.D., Lindsey, E.L., Villavicencio, N.A., et al. (2016). Variable impact of late-Quaternary megafaunal extinction in causing ecological state shifts in North and South America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 856861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, J., Swenson, J.E.,, and Persson, I.L. (2001). Recolonizing carnivores and naive prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science, 291, 10361039.Google Scholar
Bridgeland, W.T., Beier, P., Kolb, T., and Whitham, T. (2010). A conditional trophic cascade: birds benefit faster growing trees with strong links between predators and plants. Ecology, 91, 7384.Google Scholar
Buvobá, T., Vrabec, T., Kulma, M., and Nowicki, P. (2015). Land management impacts on European butterflies of conservation concern: a review. Journal of Insect Conservation, 19, 805821.Google Scholar
Cabezas-Díaz, S., Virgós, E., Mangas, J.G., and Lozano, J. (2011). The presence of a ‘competitor pit effect’ compromises wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) conservation. Animal Biology, 61, 319334.Google Scholar
Campagnaro, T., Frate, L., Carranza, M.L., and Sitzia, T. (2017). Multi-scale analysis of alpine landscapes with different intensities of abandonment reveals similar pattern changes: implications for habitat conservation. Ecological Indicators, 74, 147159.Google Scholar
Carboni, M., Dengler, J., Mantilla-Contreras, J., Venn, S., and Török, P. (2015). Conservation value, management and restoration of Europe’s semi-natural open landscapes. Hacquetia, 14, 517.Google Scholar
Caro, T. (2007). The Pleistocene re-wilding gambit. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 281283.Google Scholar
Carpio, A.J., Guerrero-Casado, J., Ruiz-Aizpurua, L., Vicente, J., and Tortosa, F.S. (2014). The high abundance of wild ungulates in a Mediterranean region: is this compatible with the European rabbit? Wildlife Biology, 20, 161166.Google Scholar
Chapron, G., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J.D.C., et al. (2014). Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science, 346, 15171519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinchy, M., Zanette, L.Y., Roberts, D., et al. (2016). Fear of the human ‘super predator’ far exceeds the fear of large carnivores in a model mesocarnivore. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 18261832.Google Scholar
Corazza, M., Tardella, F.M., Ferrari, C., and Catorci, A. (2016). Tall grass invasion after grassland abandonment influences the availability of palatable plants for wild herbivores: insights into the conservation of the Apennine chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata. Environmental Management, 57, 12471261.Google Scholar
Corlett, R.T. (2016). Restoration, reintroduction and rewilding in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 453462.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, P., Bokdam, J., Sykora, K., and Berendse, F. (2014). Effects of large herbivores on wood pasture dynamics in a European wetland system. Basic and Applied Ecology, 15, 396406.Google Scholar
Darimont, C.T., Fox, C.H., Bryan, H.M., and Reimchen, T.E. (2015). The unique ecology of human predators. Science, 349, 858860.Google Scholar
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A.A., and Hyatt, A.D. (2000). Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife: threats to biodiversity and human health. Science, 287, 443449.Google Scholar
Doak, D.F., Estes, J.A., Halpern, B.S., et al. (2008). Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable? Ecology, 89, 952961.Google Scholar
Dorresteijn, I., Schultner, J., Nimmo, D.G., et al. (2015). Incorporating anthropogenic effects into trophic ecology: predator–prey interactions in a human-dominated landscape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151602.Google Scholar
Edwards, P.J., Fletcher, M.R., and Berny, P. (2000). Review of the factors affecting the decline of the European brown hare, Lepus europaeus (Pallas, 1778), and the use of wildlife incident data to evaluate the significance of paraquat. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79, 95103.Google Scholar
Fernández, N., Navarro, L.M., and Pereira, H.M. (2017). Rewilding: a call for boosting ecological complexity in conservation. Conservation Letters, 10, 276278.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J.P., Hunter, E.A., Shoemaker, K.T., Tapia, W.H., and Cayot, L.J. (2014). Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Española Island, Galápagos. PLoS ONE, 9, e110742.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J.M., López Ezquerra, A., Behrens, S., Branca, A., and Mallet, L. (2016). Current analysis of host–parasite interactions with a focus on next generation sequencing data. Zoology, 119, 298306.Google Scholar
Griffiths, C.J., Hansen, D.M., Jones, C.G., Zuël, N., and Harris, S. (2011). Resurrecting extinct interactions with extant substitutes. Current Biology, 21, 762765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, C.J., Zuël, N., Jones, C.G., Ahamud, Z., and Harris, S. (2013). Assessing the potential torestore historic grazing ecosystems with tortoise ecological replacements. Conservation Biology, 27, 690700.Google Scholar
Guilhaumon, F., Krasnov, B.R., Poulin, R., Shenbrot, G.I., and Mouillot, D. (2012). Latitudinal mismatches between the components of mammal–flea interaction networks. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 725731.Google Scholar
Hansen, D.M., Kiesbuy, H.C., Jones, C.G., and Muller, C.B. (2007). Positive indirect interactions between neighboring plant species via a lizard pollinator. The American Naturalist, 169, 534542.Google Scholar
Hansen, D.M., Donlan, C.J., Griffiths, C.J., and Campbell, K.J. (2010). Ecological history and latent conservation potential: large and giant tortoises as a model for taxon substitutions. Ecography, 33, 272284.Google Scholar
Ims, R.A., Yoccoz, N.G., Brathen, K.A., Fauchald, P., Tveraa, T., and Hausner, V. (2007). Can reindeer overabundance cause a trophic cascade? Ecosystems, 10, 607622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaquet, S., Schwilch, G., Hartung-Hofmann, F., et al. (2015). Does outmigration lead to land degradation? Labour shortage and land management in a western Nepal watershed. Applied Geography, 62, 157170.Google Scholar
Johnson, B.E., and Cushman, J.H. (2007). Influence of a large herbivore reintroduction on plant invasions and community composition in a California grassland. Conservation Biology, 21, 515526.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.N. (2009). Ecological consequences of Late Quaternary extinctions of megafauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences Biological Sciences, 276, 25092519.Google Scholar
Katayama, N., Osawa, T., Amano, T., and Kusumoto, Y. (2015). Are both agricultural intensification and farmland abandonment threats to biodiversity? A test with bird communities in paddy-dominated landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 214, 2130.Google Scholar
Kitchen, A.M., Gese, E.M., and Schauster, E.R. (1999). Resource partitioning between coyotes and swift foxes: space, time, and diet. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77, 16451656.Google Scholar
Kristensen, P. (2003). EEA core set of indicators. Revised version April 2003. Adopted version for ECCAA countries May 2003. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Lasanta, T., Nadal-Romero, E., and Arnáez, J. (2015). Managing abandoned farmland to control the impact of re-vegetation on the environment. The state of the art in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 52, 99109.Google Scholar
Laundré, J.W., Hernandez, L., and Altendorf, K.B. (2001). Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the ‘landscape of fear’ in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 14011409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leader-Williams, N., Smith, R.I.L., and Rothery, P. (1987). Influence of introduced reindeer on the vegetation of South Georgia: results from a long-term exclusion experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 801822.Google Scholar
Leader-Williams, N., Walton, D.W.H., and Prince, P.A. (1989). Introduced reindeer on South Georgia – a management dilemma. Biological Conservation, 47, 111.Google Scholar
Lees, A.C., and Bell, D.J. (2008). A conservation paradox of the 21st century: the European wild rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, and invasive alien and an endangered natives species. Mammal Review, 38, 304320.Google Scholar
Linnell, J.D.C., Kaczensky, P., Wotschikowsky, U., Lescureux, L., and Boitani, L. (2015). Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation. Conservation Biology, 29, 978985.Google Scholar
Lisón, F., and Calvo, J.F. (2014). Bat activity over small ponds in dry Mediterranean forests: implications for conservation. Acta Chiropterologica, 16, 95101.Google Scholar
Loos, J., Dorresteijn, I., Hanspach, J., Fust, P., Rakosy, L., and Fischer, J. (2014). Low-intensity agricultural landscapes in Transylvania support high butterfly diversity: implications for conservation. PLoS ONE, 9, e103256.Google Scholar
Lozano, J., Virgós, E., Cabezas-Díaz, S., and Mangas, J.G. (2007). Increase of large game species in Mediterranean areas: is the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) facing a new threat? Biological Conservation, 138, 321329.Google Scholar
Madhusudan, M.D. (2004). Recovery of wild large herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 858869.Google Scholar
Malhi, Y., Doughty, C.E., Galleti, M., Smith, F.A., Svenning, J.C., and Terborgh, J.W. (2016). Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 838846.Google Scholar
Manning, A.D., Gordon, I.J., and Ripple, W.J. (2009). Restoring landscapes of fear with wolves in the Scottish highlands. Biological Conservation, 142, 23142321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäntylä, E., Klemola, T., and Laaksonen, T. (2011). Birds help plants: a meta-analysis of top-down trophic cascades caused by avian predators. Oecologia, 165, 143151.Google Scholar
Marini, L., Fontana, P., Battisti, A., and Gaston, K.J. (2009). Response of orthopteran diversity to abandonment of semi-natural meadows. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 132, 232236.Google Scholar
Mech, L.D., Barber-Meyer, S., Blanco, J.C., et al. (2017). An unparalleled opportunity for an important ecological study. BioScience, 67, 875876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischenko, A.L., and Sukhanova, O. (2016). Response of wader populations in the Vinogradovo foodplain (Moscow region, Russia) to changes in agricultural change and spring flooding. Wader Study, 123, 136142.Google Scholar
Mishra, C., Van Wieren, S., Heitköning, I.M.A., and Prins, H.H.T. (2002). A theoretical analysis of competitive exclusion in a Trans-Himalayan large-herbivore assemblage. Animal Conservation, 5, 251258.Google Scholar
Moreira, F., and Russo, D. (2007). Modelling the impact of agricultural abandonment and wildfires on vertebrate diversity in Mediterranean Europe. Landscape Ecology, 22, 14611467.Google Scholar
Munguira, M.L., Barea-Azcón, J.M., Castro-Cobo, S., et al. (2017). Ecology and recovery plans for the four Spanish endangered endemic butterfly species. Journal of Insect Conservation, 21, 423437.Google Scholar
Newsome, T.M., Ballard, G., Crowther, M.S., et al. (2015). Resolving the value of the dingo in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 23, 201208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogués-Bravo, D., Simberloff, D., Rahbek, C., and Sanders, N.J. (2016). Rewilding is the new Pandora’s box in conservation. Current Biology, 26, R83R101.Google Scholar
Oriol-Cotterill, A., Valeix, M., Frank, L.G., Riginos, C., and Macdonald, D.W. (2015). Landscapes of coexistence for terrestrial carnivores: the ecological consequences of being downgraded from ultimate to penultimate predator by humans. Oikos, 124, 12631273.Google Scholar
Ostfeld, R.S., and Holt, R.D. (2004). Are predators good for your health? Evaluating evidence for top-down regulation of zoonotic disease reservoirs. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 2, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R.T., Tegner, M.J., and Johnson, A.E. (1998). Compounded perturbations yield ecological surprises. Ecosystems, 1, 535545.Google Scholar
Pándi, I., Penksza, K., Botta-Dukát, Z., and Kröel-Dulay, G. (2014). People move but cultivated plants stay: abandoned farmsteads support the persistence and spread of alien plants. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 12891302.Google Scholar
Perrson, S. (1984). Vegetation development after the exclusion of grazing cattle in a meadow area in the south of Sweden. Vegetatio, 55, 6592.Google Scholar
Plieninger, T., Hui, C., Gaertner, M., and Huntsinger, L. (2014). The impact of land abandonment on species richness and abundance in the Mediterranean Basin: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9, e98355.Google Scholar
Prugh, L.R., Stoner, C.J., Epps, C.W., et al. (2009). The rise of the mesopredator. BioScience, 59, 779791.Google Scholar
Queiroz, C., Beilin, R., Folke, C., and Lindborg, R. (2014). Farmland abandonment: threat or opportunity for biodiversity conservation? A global review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 288296.Google Scholar
Quigley, B.J.Z., García López, D., Buckling, A., McKane, A.J., and Brown, S.P. (2012). The mode of host–parasite interaction shapes coevolutionary dynamics and the fate of host cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 37423748.Google Scholar
Real, R., Barbosa, A.M., Rodríguez, A., et al. (2009). Conservation biogeography of ecologically interacting species: the case of the Iberian lynx and the European rabbit. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 390400.Google Scholar
Regos, A., Domínguez, J., Gil-Tena, A., Brotons, L., Ninyerola, M., and Pons, X. (2016). Rural abandoned landscapes and bird assemblages: winners and losers in the rewilding of a marginal mountain area (NW Spain). Regional Environmental Change, 16, 199211.Google Scholar
Rey-Benayas, J.M., Martinis, A., Nicolau, J.M., and Schulz, J.J. (2007). Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2, 114.Google Scholar
Ricketts, A.M. (2016). Of mice and coyotes: mammalian responses to rangeland management practices in tallgrass prairie. PhD Dissertation, Kansas State University, USA.Google Scholar
Ripple, W.J., Estes, J.A., Beschta, R.L., et al. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science, 343, 151.Google Scholar
Ripple, W.J., Newsome, T.M., Wolf, C., et al. (2015). Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Science Advances, 1, e140010.Google Scholar
Ritchie, E.G., and Johnson, C.N. (2009). Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecology Letters, 12, 982998.Google Scholar
Sandom, C.J., Ejrnæs, R., Hansen, M.D.D., and Svenning, J.C. (2014). High herbivore density associated with vegetation diversity in interglacial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 16.Google Scholar
Saul, W.-C., and Jeschke, J.M. (2015). Eco-evolutionary experience in novel species interactions. Ecology Letters, 18, 236245.Google Scholar
Schnitzler, A. (2014). Towards a new European wilderness: embracing unmanaged forest growth and the decolonisation of nature. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126, 7480.Google Scholar
Seddon, P.J., Griffiths, C.J., Soorae, P.S., and Armstrong, D.P. (2014). Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science, 345, 406412.Google Scholar
Shengfa, L., and Xiubin, L. (2017). A global understanding of farmland abandonment: a review and prospects. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27, 11231150.Google Scholar
Slancarova, J., Bartonova, A., Zapletal, M., et al. (2016). Life history traits reflect changes in Mediterranean butterfly communities due to forest encroachment. PLoS ONE, 11, e0152026.Google Scholar
Smit, C., Kruifot, J.L., van Klink, R., and Olff, H. (2015). Rewilding with large herbivores: the importance of grazing refuges for sapling establishment and wood–pasture formation. Biological Conservation, 182, 134142.Google Scholar
Smith, C.I. (2005). Re-wilding: introductions could reduce biodiversity. Nature, 437, 318.Google Scholar
Smith, J.A., Wang, Y., and Wilmers, C.C. (2015). Top carnivores increase their kill rates on prey as a response to human-induced fear. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20142711.Google Scholar
Soulé, M., and Noss, R. (1998). Rewilding and biodiversity: complementary goals for continental conservation. Wild Earth, 8, 1928.Google Scholar
Sovada, M.A., Roy, C.C., Bright, J.B., and Gillis, J.R. (1998). Causes and rates of mortality of swift foxes in western Kansas. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62, 13001306.Google Scholar
Speed, J.D., and Austrheim, G. (2017). The importance of herbivore density and management as determinants of the distribution of rare plant species. Biological Conservation, 205, 7784.Google Scholar
Steinwandter, M., Schlick-Steiner, B., Seeber, G.U.H., Steiner, F.M., and Seeber, J. (2017). Effects of Alpine land-use changes: soil macrofauna community revisited. Ecology and Evolution, 7, 53895399.Google Scholar
Sterner, R.W., and Elser, J.J. (2002). Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suraci, J.P., Clinchy, M., Dill, L.M., Roberts, D., and Zanette, L.Y. (2016). Fear of large carnivores causes a trophic cascade. Nature Communications, 7, 10698.Google Scholar
Suzuki, R.O., Kenta, T., Sato, M., Masaki, D., and Kanai, R. (2016). Continuous harvesting of a dominant bracken alters a cool–temperate montane grassland community and increases plant diversity in Nagano. Ecological Restoration, 31, 639644.Google Scholar
Svenning, J.C., Pedersen, P.B.M., Donlan, C.J., et al. (2016). Science for a wilder Anthropocene: synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 898906.Google Scholar
Tambling, C., Minnie, L., Meyer, J., et al. (2015). Temporal shifts in activity of prey following large predator reintroductions. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 11531161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torre, I., Bros, V., and Santos, X. (2014). Assessing the impact of restoration on the diversity of Mediterranean terrestrial Gastropoda. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 25792589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towne, E.G., Hartnett, D.C., and Cochran, R.C. (2005). Vegetation trends in tallgrass prairie from bison and cattle grazing. Ecological Applications, 15, 15501559.Google Scholar
Uchida, K., and Ushimaru, A. (2014). Biodiversity declines due to land abandonment and intensification of agricultural lands: patterns and mechanisms. Ecological Monographs, 84, 637658.Google Scholar
Uchida, K., Takahashi, S., Shinohara, T., and Ushimaru, A. (2016). Threatened herbivorous insects maintained by long-term traditional management practices in semi-natural grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 221, 156162.Google Scholar
Vera, F.W.M. (2009). Large-scale nature development – the Oostvaardersplassen. British Wildlife, 2009, 2836.Google Scholar
Wehn, S., and Johansen, L. (2015). The distribution of the endemic plant Primula scandinavica, at local and national scales, in changing mountains environments. Biodiversity, 16, 278288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J.A., and Hobbs, R.J. (2015). Integrating conservation and restoration in a changing world. BioScience, 65, 302312.Google Scholar
Zakkak, S., Chatzaki, M., Karamalis, N., and Kati, V. (2014). Spiders in the context of agricultural land abandonment in Greek mountains: species responses, community structure and the need to preserve traditional agricultural practices. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18, 599611.Google Scholar
Zakkak, S., Radovic, A., Nikolov, S.C., Shumka, S., Kakalis, L., and Kati, V. (2015a). Assessing the effect of agricultural land abandonment on bird communities in south-eastern Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 164, 171179.Google Scholar
Zakkak, S., Halley, J.M., Akriotis, T., and Kati, V. (2015b). Lizards along an agricultural land abandonment gradient in Pindos Mountains, Greece. Amphibia–Reptilia, 36, 253264.Google Scholar
Zimov, S.A. (2005). Pleistocene Park: return of the mammoth’s ecosystem. Science, 308, 796798.Google Scholar
Zimov, S.A., Chupryin, V.I., Oreshko, A.P., Chapin III, F.S., Reynolds, J.F., and Chapin, M.C. (1995). Steppe–tundra transition: a herbivore-driven biome shift at the end of the Pleistocene. The American Naturalist, 146, 765794.Google Scholar
Zimov, S.A., Zimov, N.S., Tikhonov, A.N., and Chapin, F.S. (2012). Mammoth steppe: a high-productivity phenomenon. Quaternary Science Reviews, 57, 2645.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×