Abraham, Ralph, Marsden, Jerrold E., and Ratiu, Tudor. Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, and Applications, volume 75 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, Ralph and Marsden, Jerrold E.. Foundations of Mechanics, volume 36. Benjam-in/Cummings Publishing Company Reading, Massachusetts, 1978.Google Scholar

Agrawal, Mradul, Vidyashankar, Sandeep, and Huang, Ke. On-chip implementation of ECoG signal data decoding in brain-computer interface. In Mixed-Signal Testing Workshop (IMSTW), 2016 IEEE 21st International, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2016.Google Scholar

Agrawal, Rakesh, Srikant, Ramakrishnan, et al. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In Proc. 20th int. conf. very large data bases, VLDB, volume 1215, pages 487–499, 1994.Google Scholar

Ahn, Hyo-Sung, Chen, YangQuan, and Moore, Kevin L.. Iterative learning control: Brief survey and categorization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 37(6):1099–1121, 2007.Google Scholar

Akaike, Hirotugu. Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21(1):243–247, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akaike, Hirotugu. A new look at the statistical model identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 19(6):716–723, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amrein, W. O. and Berthier, Anne-Marie. On support properties of Lp-functions and their Fourier transforms. Journal of Functional Analysis, 24(3):258–267, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amsallem, David, Cortial, Julien, and Farhat, Charbel. On-demand cfd-based aeroelastic predictions using a database of reduced-order bases and models. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, page 800, 2009.Google Scholar

Amsallem, David and Farhat, Charbel. An online method for interpolating linear parametric reduced-order models. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 33(5):2169–2198, 2011.Google Scholar

Amsallem, David, Zahr, Matthew J., and Washabaugh, Kyle. Fast local reduced basis updates for the efficient reduction of nonlinear systems with hyper-reduction. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 41(5):1187–1230, 2015.Google Scholar

Andén, Joakim and Mallat, Stéphane. Deep scattering spectrum. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(16):4114–4128, 2014.Google Scholar

Anderson, Edward, Bai, Zhaojun, Bischof, Christian, Blackford, Susan, Demmel, James, Dongarra, Jack, Croz, Jeremy Du, Greenbaum, Anne, Hammerling, S., McKenney, Alan, et al. LAPACK Users’ Guide, volume 9. SIAM, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Jeffrey L.. An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Monthly Weather Review, 129(12):2884–2903, 2001.Google Scholar

Claus, A. Andersson and Rasmus Bro. The n-way toolbox for matlab. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 52(1):1–4, 2000.Google Scholar

Antonini, Marc, Barlaud, Michel, Mathieu, Pierre, and Daubechies, Ingrid. Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1(2):205–220, 1992.Google Scholar

Athanasios, C. Antoulas. Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems. SIAM, 2005.Google Scholar

Arbabi, Hassan and Mezić, Igor. Ergodic theory, dynamic mode decomposition and computation of spectral properties of the Koopman operator. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16 (4):2096–2126, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariyur, Kartik B. and Krstić, Miroslav. Real-Time Optimization by Extremum-Seeking Control. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003.Google Scholar

Askham, Travis and Kutz, J. Nathan. Variable projection methods for an optimized dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 17 (1):380–416, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astrid, Patricia. Fast reduced order modeling technique for large scale LTV systems. In American Control Conference, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004, volume 1, pages 762–767. IEEE, 2004.Google Scholar

Aström, Karl Johan and Murray, Richard M.. Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Azeez, M. F. A. and Vakakis, A. F.. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of a class of vibroimpact oscillations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 240(5):859–889, 2001.Google Scholar

Bache, K. and Lichman, M.. UCI machine learning repository, 2013.Google Scholar

Brett, W. Bader and Tamara G. Kolda. Efficient MATLAB computations with sparse and factored tensors. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30(1):205–231, December 2007.Google Scholar

Bagheri, S., Brandt, L., and Henningson, D. S.. Input-output analysis, model reduction and control of the flat-plate boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 620:263–298, 2009.Google Scholar

Bagheri, S., Hoepffner, J., Schmid, P. J., and Henningson, D. S.. Input-output analysis and control design applied to a linear model of spatially developing flows. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 62(2):020803–1..27, 2009.Google Scholar

Bagheri, Shervin. Koopman-mode decomposition of the cylinder wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 726:596–623, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, Z., Brunton, S. L., Brunton, B. W., Kutz, J. N., Kaiser, E., Spohn, A., and Noack, B. R.. Data-driven methods in fluid dynamics: Sparse classification from experimental data. In Invited Chapter for Whither Turbulence and Big Data in the 21st Century, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, Z., Kaiser, E., Proctor, J. L., Kutz, J. N., and Brunton, S. L.. Dynamic mode decomposition for compressive system identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.07737, 2017.Google Scholar

Bai, Zhe, Wimalajeewa, Thakshila, Berger, Zachary, Wang, Guannan, Glauser, Mark, and Varshney, Pramod K.. Low-dimensional approach for reconstruction of airfoil data via compressive sensing. AIAA Journal, 53(4):920–933, 2014.Google Scholar

Balajewicz, Maciej J., Dowell, Earl H., and Noack, Bernd R.. Low-dimensional modelling of high-Reynolds-number shear flows incorporating constraints from the Navier–Stokes equation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 729:285–308, 2013.Google Scholar

Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan, Zabic, Stanislav, Bowd, Christopher, Thompson, Hilary W., Wolenski, Peter, Iyengar, S. Sitharama, Karki, Bijaya B., and Zangwill, Linda M.. A framework for detecting glaucomatous progression in the optic nerve head of an eye using proper orthogonal decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 13(5):781–793, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bamieh, B. and Giarré, L.. Identification of linear parameter varying models. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 12:841–853, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banaszuk, Andrzej, Ariyur, Kartik B., Krstić, Miroslav, and Jacobson, Clas A.. An adaptive algorithm for control of combustion instability. Automatica, 40(11):1965–1972, 2004.Google Scholar

Banaszuk, Andrzej, Narayanan, Satish, and Zhang, Youping. Adaptive control of flow separation in a planar diffuser. AIAA paper, 617:2003, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banaszuk, Andrzej, Zhang, Youping, and Jacobson, Clas A.. Adaptive control of combustion instability using extremum-seeking. In American Control Conference, 2000. Proceedings of the 2000, volume 1, pages 416–422. IEEE, 2000.Google Scholar

Banks, S. P.. Infinite-dimensional Carleman linearization, the Lie series and optimal control of non-linear partial differential equations. International Journal of Systems Science, 23(5):663– 675, 1992.Google Scholar

Baraniuk, R. G.. Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(4):118–120, 2007.Google Scholar

Baraniuk, R. G., Cevher, V., Duarte, M. F., and Hegde, C.. Model-based compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56(4):1982–2001, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrault, Maxime, Maday, Yvon, Nguyen, Ngoc Cuong, and Patera, Anthony T.. An empirical interpolation method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 339(9):667–672, 2004.Google Scholar

Basley, J., Pastur, L. R., Delprat, N., and Lusseyran, F.. Space-time aspects of a three-dimensional multi-modulated open cavity flow. Physics of Fluids (1994-present), 25(6):064105, 2013.Google Scholar

Basley, J., Pastur, L. R., Lusseyran, F., Faure, T. M., and Delprat, N.. Experimental investigation of global structures in an incompressible cavity flow using time-resolved PIV. Experiments in Fluids, 50(4):905–918, 2011.Google Scholar

Baur, Walter and Strassen, Volker. The complexity of partial derivatives. Theoretical Computer Science, 22(3):317–330, 1983.Google Scholar

Beaudoin, J. F., Cadot, O., Aider, J. L., and Wesfreid, J. E.. Bluff-body drag reduction by extremum-seeking control. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 22:973–978, 2006.Google Scholar

Beaudoin, Jean-Francois, Cadot, Olivier, Aider, Jean-Luc, and Wesfreid, José-Eduardo. Drag reduction of a bluff body using adaptive control methods. Physics of Fluids, 18(8):085107, 2006.Google Scholar

Becker, R., King, R., Petz, R., and Nitsche, W.. Adaptive closed-loop control on a high-lift configuration using extremum seeking. AIAA Journal, 45(6):1382–92, 2007.Google Scholar

Belhumeur, P. N., Hespanha, J. P., and Kriegman, D. J.. Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 19(7):711–720, 1997.Google Scholar

Bellani, G.. Experimental studies of complex flows through image-based techniques. 2011.Google Scholar

Belson, Brandt A., Tu, Jonathan H., and Rowley, Clarence W.. Algorithm 945: modred—a parallelized model reduction library. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 40(4):30, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedicks, Michael. On Fourier transforms of functions supported on sets of finite Lebesgue measure. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 106(1):180–183, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bengio, Yoshua, Lamblin, Pascal, Popovici, Dan, and Larochelle, Hugo. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 153–160, 2007.Google Scholar

Benner, P., Gugercin, S., and Willcox, K. A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems. SIAM Review, 57(4):483–531, 2015.Google Scholar

Benner, Peter, Cohen, Albert, Ohlberger, Mario, and Willcox, Karen. Model Reduction and Approximation: Theory and Algorithms, volume 15. SIAM, 2017.Google Scholar

Benner, Peter, Li, Jing-Rebecca, and Penzl, Thilo. Numerical solution of large-scale Lyapunov equations, Riccati equations, and linear-quadratic optimal control problems. Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, 15(9):755–777, 2008.Google Scholar

Berger, E., Sastuba, M., Vogt, D., Jung, B., and Amor, H. B.. Estimation of perturbations in robotic behavior using dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Advanced Robotics, 29(5):331–343, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkooz, G., Holmes, P., and Lumley, J. L.. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 25:539–575, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beylkin, Gregory, Coifman, Ronald, and Rokhlin, Vladimir. Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms i. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 44(2):141–183, 1991.Google Scholar

Billings, Stephen A.. Nonlinear System Identification: NARMAX Methods in the Time, Frequency, and Spatio-Temporal Domains. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binetti, P., Ariyur, K. B., Krstić, M., and Bernelli, F.. Formation flight optimization using extremum seeking feedback. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 26(1):132–142, 2003.Google Scholar

Birkhoff, G. D. and Koopman, B. O.. Recent contributions to the ergodic theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18(3):279–282, 1932.Google Scholar

Birkhoff, George D.. Proof of the ergodic theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 17(12):656–660, 1931.Google Scholar

Bishop, Christopher M.. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford university press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, Christopher M.. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer New York, 2006.Google Scholar

Bistrian, D. A. and Navon, I. M.. An improved algorithm for the shallow water equations model reduction: Dynamic mode decomposition vs POD. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2015.Google Scholar

Bistrian, D. A. and Navon, I. M.. Randomized dynamic mode decomposition for non-intrusive reduced order modelling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016.Google Scholar

Bondi, Paola, Casalino, Giuseppe, and Gambardella, Lucia. On the iterative learning control theory for robotic manipulators. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 4(1):14–22, 1988.Google Scholar

Bongard, Josh and Lipson, Hod. Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(24):9943–9948, 2007.Google Scholar

Borges, Jorge Luis. The library of Babel. Collected Fictions, 1998.Google Scholar

Boser, Bernhard E., Guyon, Isabelle M., and Vapnik, Vladimir N.. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 144–152. ACM, 1992.Google Scholar

Boulard, H. and Kamp, Y.. Autoassociative memory by multilayer perceptron and singular values decomposition. Biol Cybern, 59:291–294, 1989.Google Scholar

Box, George E. P., Jenkins, Gwilym M., Reinsel, Gregory C., and Ljung, Greta M.. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Google Scholar

Boyd, Stephen, Chua, Leon O., and Desoer, Charles A.. Analytical foundations of Volterra series. IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 1(3):243–282, 1984.Google Scholar

Boyd, Stephen and Vandenberghe, Lieven. Convex Pptimization. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bratcu, Antoneta Iuliana, Munteanu, Iulian, Bacha, Seddik, and Raison, Bertrand. Maximum power point tracking of grid-connected photovoltaic arrays by using extremum seeking control. CEAI, 10(4):3–12, 2008.Google Scholar

Breiman, Leo. Better subset regression using the nonnegative garrote. Technometrics, 37(4):373–384, 1995.Google Scholar

Breiman, Leo. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5–32, 2001.Google Scholar

Breiman, Leo et al. Statistical modeling: The two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Statistical Science, 16(3):199–231, 2001.Google Scholar

Breiman, Leo, Friedman, Jerome, Stone, Charles J., and Olshen, Richard A.. Classification and Regression Trees. CRC press, 1984.Google Scholar

Bright, I., Lin, G., and Kutz, J. N.. Compressive sensing and machine learning strategies for characterizing the flow around a cylinder with limited pressure measurements. Physics of Fluids, 25(127102):1–15, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bright, Ido, Lin, Guang, and Kutz, J. Nathan. Classification of spatio-temporal data via asynchronous sparse sampling: Application to flow around a cylinder. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 14 (2), 823–838, 2016.Google Scholar

Brin, Sergey and Page, Lawrence. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7):107–117, 1998.Google Scholar

Bristow, Douglas, Tharayil, Marina, Alleyne, Andrew G., et al. A survey of iterative learning control. Control Systems, IEEE, 26(3):96–114, 2006.Google Scholar

Bro, Rasmus. Parafac. tutorial and applications. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 38(2):149–171, 1997.Google Scholar

Broad, Alexander, Murphey, T. D., and Argall, Brenna. Learning models for shared control of human-machine systems with unknown dynamics. Robotics: Science and Systems Proceedings, 2017.Google Scholar

Brockett, Roger W.. Volterra series and geometric control theory. Automatica, 12(2):167–176, 1976.Google Scholar

Broomhead, David S. and Lowe, David. Radial basis functions, multi-variable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Technical report, Royal Signals and Radar Establishment Malvern (United Kingdom), 1988.Google Scholar

Broomhead, D. S. and Jones, R. Time-series analysis. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, volume 423, pages 103–121. The Royal Society, 1989.Google Scholar

Brunton, B. W., Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Sparse sensor placement optimization for classification. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 76(5):2099–2122, 2016.Google Scholar

Brunton, B. W., Johnson, L. A., Ojemann, J. G., and Kutz, J. N.. Extracting spatial–temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 258:1–15, 2016.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L., Brunton, B. W., Proctor, J. L., Kaiser, E., and Kutz, J. N.. Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system. Nature Communications, 8(19):1–9, 2017.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L., Brunton, B. W., Proctor, J. L., and Kutz, J. N. Koopman invariant subspaces and finite linear representations of nonlinear dynamical systems for control. PLoS ONE, 11(2):e0150171, 2016.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L., Fu, X., and Kutz, J. N.. Extremum-seeking control of a mode-locked laser. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 49(10):852–861, 2013.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L. and Noack, B. R.. Closed-loop turbulence control: Progress and challenges. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 67:050801–1–050801–48, 2015.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(15):3932–3937, 2016.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., Tu, J. H., and Kutz, J. N.. Compressed sensing and dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2(2):165–191, 2015.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L. and Rowley, C. W.. Maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic optimization using ripple-based extremum seeking control. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 25(10):2531–2540, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunton, S. L., Tu, J. H., Bright, I., and Kutz, J. N.. Compressive sensing and low-rank libraries for classification of bifurcation regimes in nonlinear dynamical systems. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 13(4):1716–1732, 2014.Google Scholar

Brunton, Steven L., Fu, Xing, and Kutz, J. Nathan. Self-tuning fiber lasers. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 20(5), 2014.Google Scholar

Brunton, Steven L, Proctor, Joshua L, and Kutz, J Nathan. Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics with control (SINDYc). IFAC NOLCOS, 49(18):710–715, 2016.Google Scholar

Buche, D., Stoll, Peter, Dornberger, Rolf, and Koumoutsakos, Petros. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for the optimization of noisy combustion processes. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 32(4):460–473, 2002.Google Scholar

Budišić, Marko and Mezić, Igor. An approximate parametrization of the ergodic partition using time averaged observables. In Decision and Control, 2009 held jointly with the 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference. CDC/CCC 2009. Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on, pages 3162–3168. IEEE, 2009.Google Scholar

Budišić, Marko and Mezić, Igor. Geometry of the ergodic quotient reveals coherent structures in flows. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 241(15):1255–1269, 2012.Google Scholar

Budišić, Marko, Mohr, Ryan, and Mezić, Igor. Applied Koopmanism a). Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22(4):047510, 2012.Google Scholar

Burnham, Kenneth P. and Anderson, David R.. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.Google Scholar

Businger, Peter A. and Golub, Gene H.. Algorithm 358: Singular value decomposition of a complex matrix [f1, 4, 5] . Communications of the ACM, 12(10):564–565, 1969.Google Scholar

Eduardo, F. Camacho and Carlos Bordons Alba. Model Predictive Control. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Google Scholar

Cambria, Erik, Huang, Guang-Bin, Lekamalage, Liyanaarachchi Kasun, Chamara, Zhou, Hongming, Vong, Chi Man, Lin, Jiarun, Yin, Jianping, Cai, Zhiping, Liu, Qiang, Li, Kuan, et al. Extreme learning machines [trends & controversies] . IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(6):30–59, 2013.Google Scholar

Candès, E. J.. Compressive sensing. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematics, 2006.Google Scholar

Candès, E. J., Li, X., Ma, Y., and Wright, J.. Robust principal component analysis? Journal of the ACM, 58(3):11–1–11–37, 2011.Google Scholar

Candès, E. J., Romberg, J., and Tao, T.. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(2):489–509, 2006.Google Scholar

Candès, E. J., Romberg, J., and Tao, T.. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 8(1207–1223), 59.Google Scholar

Candès, E. J. and Tao, T.. Near optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies? IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(12):5406–5425, 2006.Google Scholar

Candès, E. J. and Wakin, M. B.. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pages 21–30, 2008.Google Scholar

Candes, Emmanuel J. and Tao, Terence. Decoding by linear programming. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 51(12):4203–4215, 2005.Google Scholar

Cao, Yanhua, Zhu, Jiang, Luo, Zhendong, and Navon, IM. Reduced-order modeling of the upper tropical pacific ocean model using proper orthogonal decomposition. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 52(8):1373–1386, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, Yanhua, Zhu, Jiang, Navon, I Michael, and Luo, Zhendong. A reduced-order approach to four-dimensional variational data assimilation using proper orthogonal decomposition. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 53(10):1571–1583, 2007.Google Scholar

Carlberg, Kevin, Barone, Matthew, and Antil, Harbir. Galerkin v. least-squares Petrov–Galerkin projection in nonlinear model reduction. Journal of Computational Physics, 330:693–734, 2017.Google Scholar

Carlberg, Kevin, Bou-Mosleh, Charbel, and Farhat, Charbel. Efficient non-linear model reduction via a least-squares Petrov–Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 86(2):155–181, 2011.Google Scholar

Carlberg, Kevin, Farhat, Charbel, Cortial, Julien, and Amsallem, David. The GNAT method for nonlinear model reduction: effective implementation and application to computational fluid dynamics and turbulent flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 242:623–647, 2013.Google Scholar

Carleman, Torsten. Application de la théorie des équations intégrales linéaires aux systémes d’équations différentielles non linéaires. Acta Mathematica, 59(1):63–87, 1932.Google Scholar

Carleman, Torsten. Sur la théorie de l’équation intégrodifférentielle de boltzmann. Acta Mathematica, 60(1):91–146, 1933.Google Scholar

Carleman, Torsten. Sur les systemes lineaires aux dérivées partielles du premier ordrea deux variables. CR Acad. Sci. Paris, 197:471–474, 1933.Google Scholar

J. Carroll, Douglas and Chang, Jih-Jie. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 35:283–319, 1970.Google Scholar

Chartrand, Rick. Numerical differentiation of noisy, nonsmooth data. ISRN Applied Mathematics, 2011, 2011.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Anindya. An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Current Science, 78(7):808–817, 2000.Google Scholar

Chaturantabut, S. and Sorensen, D. C.. Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 32(5):2737–2764, 2010.Google Scholar

Chen, K. K. and Rowley, C. W.. Normalized coprime robust stability and performance guarantees for reduced-order controllers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58(4):1068– 1073, 2013.Google Scholar

Chen, K. K., Tu, J. H., and Rowley, C. W.. Variants of dynamic mode decomposition: Boundary condition, Koopman, and Fourier analyses. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22(6):887–915, 2012.Google Scholar

Chen, Yangquan, Moore, Kevin L, and Ahn, Hyo-Sung. Iterative learning control. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pages 1648–1652. Springer, 2012.Google Scholar

Cherry, Steve. Singular value decomposition analysis and canonical correlation analysis. Journal of Climate, 9(9):2003–2009, 1996.Google Scholar

Cho, Kyunghyun, Merriënboer, Bart Van, Gulcehre, Caglar, Bahdanau, Dzmitry, Bougares, Fethi, Schwenk, Holger, and Bengio, Yoshua. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078, 2014.Google Scholar

Choi, J. Y., Krstić, M., Ariyur, K. B., and Lee, J. S.. Extremum seeking control for discrete-time systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(2):318–323, FEB 2002.Google Scholar

Choi, Youngsoo, Amsallem, David, and Farhat, Charbel. Gradient-based constrained optimization using a database of linear reduced-order models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.07849, 2015.Google Scholar

Colonius, T. and Taira, K.. A fast immersed boundary method using a nullspace approach and multi-domain far-field boundary conditions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197:2131–2146, 2008.Google Scholar

Cooley, James W., Lewis, Peter A. W., and Welch, Peter D.. Historical notes on the fast Fourier transform. Proceedings of the IEEE, 55(10):1675–1677, 1967.Google Scholar

Cooley, James W. and Tukey, John W. An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Mathematics of Computation, 19(90):297–301, 1965.Google Scholar

Cortes, Corinna and Vapnik, Vladimir. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3):273–297, 1995.Google Scholar

Cross, Mark C. and Hohenberg, Pierre C.. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65(3):851, 1993.Google Scholar

Crutchfield, James P. and McNamara, Bruce S.. Equations of motion from a data series. Complex Systems, 1:417–452, 1987.Google Scholar

Dam, Magnus, Brøns, Morten, Rasmussen, Jens Juul, Naulin, Volker, and Hesthaven, Jan S.. Sparse identification of a predator-prey system from simulation data of a convection model. Physics of Plasmas, 24(2):022310, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, Bryan C. and Nemenman, Ilya. Automated adaptive inference of phenomenological dynamical models. Nature Communications, 6, 2015.Google Scholar

Daniels, Bryan C. and Nemenman, Ilya. Efficient inference of parsimonious phenomenological models of cellular dynamics using s-systems and alternating regression. PloS one, 10(3):e0119821, 2015.Google Scholar

Das, Suddhasattwa and Giannakis, Dimitrios. Delay-coordinate maps and the spectra of Koopman operators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08544, 2017.Google Scholar

Daubechies, Ingrid. The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE transactions on information theory, 36(5):961–1005, 1990.Google Scholar

Davis, Lawrence et al. Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, volume 115. Van Nostrand Reinhold New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Dawson, Scott T. M., Hemati, Maziar S., Williams, Matthew O., and Rowley, Clarence W.. Characterizing and correcting for the effect of sensor noise in the dynamic mode decomposition. Experiments in Fluids, 57(3):1–19, 2016.Google Scholar

Dempster, Arthur P., Laird, Nan M., and Rubin, Donald B.. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological), pages 1–38, 1977.Google Scholar

Devasia, Santosh, Chen, Degang, and Paden, Brad. Nonlinear inversion-based output tracking. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 41(7):930–942, 1996.Google Scholar

Donoho, D. L.. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(4):1289– 1306, 2006.Google Scholar

Donoho, D. L. and Gavish, M.. Code supplement to “The optimal hard threshold for singular values is http://purl.stanford.edu/vg705qn9070, 2014.Google Scholar

Donoho, David. 50 years of data science. In Based on a Presentation at the Tukey Centennial Workshop. NJ Princeton, 2015.Google Scholar

Donoho, David L., Johnstone, Iain M, Hoch, Jeffrey C, and Stern, Alan S. Maximum entropy and the nearly black object. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), pages 41–81, 1992.Google Scholar

Donoho, David L. and Johnstone, Jain M.. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika, 81(3):425–455, 1994.Google Scholar

Doyle, J. C.. Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 23(4):756–757, 1978.Google Scholar

Doyle, J. C., Glover, K., Khargonekar, P. P., and Francis, B. A.. State-space solutions to standard H₂ and H_∞ control problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 34(8):831–847, 1989.Google Scholar

Doyle, John C., Francis, Bruce A., and Tannenbaum, Allen R.. Feedback Control Theory. Courier Corporation, 2013.Google Scholar

Drineas, Petros and Mahoney, Michael W.. A randomized algorithm for a tensor-based generalization of the singular value decomposition. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 420(2-3):553–571, 2007.Google Scholar

Drmac, Zlatko and Gugercin, Serkan. A new selection operator for the discrete empirical interpolation method—improved a priori error bound and extensions. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 38(2):A631–A648, 2016.Google Scholar

Du, Qiang and Gunzburger, Max. Model reduction by proper orthogonal decomposition coupled with centroidal voronoi tessellations (keynote). In ASME 2002 Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Division Conference, pages 1401–1406. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2002.Google Scholar

Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., and Stork, D. G.. Pattern Classification. Wiley-Interscience, 2000.Google Scholar

Duersch, Jed A. and Gu, Ming. Randomized QR with column pivoting. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 39(4):C263–C291, 2017.Google Scholar

Duke, D., Honnery, D., and Soria, J.. Experimental investigation of nonlinear instabilities in annular liquid sheets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 691:594–604, 2012.Google Scholar

Duke, Daniel, Soria, Julio, and Honnery, Damon. An error analysis of the dynamic mode decomposition. Experiments in Fluids, 52(2):529–542, 2012.Google Scholar

Dullerud, Geir. E. and Paganini, Fernando. A Course in Robust Control Theory: A Convex Approach. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000.Google Scholar

Dunne, R. and McKeon, B. J.. Dynamic stall on a pitching and surging airfoil. Experiments in Fluids, 56(8):1–15, 2015.Google Scholar

Duriez, T., Brunton, S. L., and Noack, B. R.. Machine Learning Control: Taming Nonlinear Dynamics and Turbulence. Springer, 2016.Google Scholar

Duriez, Thomas, Parezanović, Vladimir, Cordier, Laurent, Noack, Bernd R., Delville, Joël, Bonnet, Jean-Paul, Segond, Marc, and Abel, Markus. Closed-loop turbulence control using machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.4589, 2014.Google Scholar

Duriez, Thomas, Parezanovic, Vladimir, Laurentie, Jean-Charles, Fourment, Carine, Delville, Joël, Bonnet, Jean-Paul, Cordier, Laurent, Noack, Bernd R, Segond, Marc, Abel, Markus, Gautier, Nicolas, Aider, Jean-Luc, Raibaudo, Cedric, Cuvier, Christophe, Stanislas, Michel, and Brunton, Steven L. Closed-loop control of experimental shear flows using machine learning. AIAA Paper 2014-2219, 7th Flow Control Conference, 2014.Google Scholar

Eckart, C. and Young, G.. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1(3):211–218, 1936.Google Scholar

Eftang, Jens L., Patera, Anthony T., and Rønquist, Einar M.. An” hp” certified reduced basis method for parametrized elliptic partial differential equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 32(6):3170–3200, 2010.Google Scholar

Elman, Jeffrey L.. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2):179–211, 1990.Google Scholar

Eren, Utku, Prach, Anna, Koçer, Başaran Bahadır, Raković, Saša V., Kayacan, Erdal, and Açıkmeşe, Behçet. Model predictive control in aerospace systems: Current state and opportunities. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(7):1541–1566, 2017.Google Scholar

Erichson, N. B., Brunton, S. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Compressed dynamic mode decomposition for real-time object detection. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 2016.Google Scholar

Erichson, N. B., Brunton, S. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Randomized dynamic mode decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.02912, 2017.Google Scholar

Erichson, N. B., Manohar, K., Brunton, S. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Randomized CP tensor decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.09074.Google Scholar

Erichson, N. B., Voronin, S., Brunton, S. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Randomized matrix decompositions using R. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02148, 2016.Google Scholar

Esram, Trishan, Kimball, Jonathan W., Krein, Philip T, Chapman, Patrick L., and Midya, Pallab. Dynamic maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic arrays using ripple correlation control. Ieee Transactions On Power Electronics, 21(5):1282–1291, September 2006.Google Scholar

Everson, Richard and Sirovich, Lawrence. Karhunen–Loeve procedure for gappy data. JOSA A, 12(8):1657–1664, 1995.Google Scholar

Fabbiane, N., Semeraro, O., Bagheri, S., and Henningson, D. S.. Adaptive and model-based control theory applied to convectively unstable flows. Appl. Mech. Rev., 66(6):060801–1–20, 2014.Google Scholar

Feeny, B. F.. On proper orthogonal co-ordinates as indicators of modal activity. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 255(5):805–817, 2002.Google Scholar

Fisher, Ronald A.. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Human Genetics, 7(2):179–188, 1936.Google Scholar

Fisher, Ronald Aylmer. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 222:309–368, 1922.Google Scholar

Fleming, P. J. and Purshouse, R. C.. Evolutionary algorithms in control systems engineering: a survey. Control Engineering Practice, 10:1223–1241, 2002.Google Scholar

Fourier, Jean Baptiste Joseph. The Analytical Theory of Heat. The University Press, 1878.Google Scholar

Fourier, Joseph. Theorie analytique de la chaleur, par M. Fourier. Chez Firmin Didot, père et fils, 1822.Google Scholar

Fowler, J. E.. Compressive-projection principal component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 18(10):2230–2242, 2009.Google Scholar

Freund, Yoav and Schapire, Robert E.. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1):119–139, 1997.Google Scholar

Friedman, Jerome H.. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, pages 1189–1232, 2001.Google Scholar

Frieze, Alan, Kannan, Ravi, and Vempala, Santosh. Fast Monte-Carlo algorithms for finding low-rank approximations. Journal of the ACM, 51(6):1025–1041, 2004.Google Scholar

Fu, Xing, Brunton, Steven L., and Kutz, J. Nathan. Classification of birefringence in mode-locked fiber lasers using machine learning and sparse representation. Optics Express, 22(7):8585–8597, 2014.Google Scholar

Fukagata, Koji, Kern, Stefan, Chatelain, Philippe, Koumoutsakos, Petros, and Kasagi, Nobuhide. Evolutionary optimization of an anisotropic compliant surface for turbulent friction drag reduction. Journal of Turbulence, 9(35):1–17, 2008.Google Scholar

Fukushima, F.. A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetic, 36:193–202, 1980.Google Scholar

Gao, H., Lam, J., Wang, C., and Wang, Y.. Delay-dependent output-feedback stabilisation of discrete-time systems with time-varying state delay. IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications, 151(6):691–698, 2004.Google Scholar

Garcia, Carlos E., Prett, David M., and Morari, Manfred. Model predictive control: theory and practice: A survey. Automatica, 25(3):335–348, 1989.Google Scholar

Garriga, Jorge L. and Soroush, Masoud. Model predictive control tuning methods: A review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(8):3505–3515, 2010.Google Scholar

Gauss, Carl-Friedrich. Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae, volume 1. Henricus Dieterich, 1823.Google Scholar

Gauss, C. F.. Nachlass: Theoria interpolationis methodo nova tractata, volume werke. Königliche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Göttingen, 1866.Google Scholar

Gautier, Nicolas, Aider, J-L., Duriez, Thomas, Noack, B. R., Segond, Marc, and Abel, Markus. Closed-loop separation control using machine learning. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 770:442– 457, 2015.Google Scholar

Gavish, M. and Donoho, D. L.. The optimal hard threshold for singular values is 4/ 3. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 60(8):5040–5053, 2014.Google Scholar

Gazzola, Mattia, Vasilyev, Oleg V., and Koumoutsakos, Petros. Shape optimization for drag reduction in linked bodies using evolution strategies. Computers & Structures, 89(11):1224– 1231, 2011.Google Scholar

Gelbert, Gregor, Moeck, Jonas P., Paschereit, Christian O., and King, Rudibert. Advanced algorithms for gradient estimation in one-and two-parameter extremum seeking controllers. Journal of Process Control, 22(4):700–709, 2012.Google Scholar

Georghiades, A. S., Belhumeur, P. N., and Kriegman, D. J.. From few to many: Illumination cone models for face recognition under variable lighting and pose. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 23(6):643–660, 2001.Google Scholar

Gerbrands, Jan J.. On the relationships between SVD, KLT and PCA. Pattern Recognition, 14(1):375–381, 1981.Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. C. and Indyk, P.. Sparse recovery using sparse matrices. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(6):937–947, 2010.Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. C., Park, J. Y., and Wakin, M. B.. Sketched SVD: Recovering spectral features from compressive measurements. ArXiv e-prints, 2012.Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. C., Strauss, M. J., and Tropp, J. A.. A tutorial on fast Fourier sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pages 57–66, 2008.Google Scholar

Glaz, Bryan, Liu, Li, and Friedmann, Peretz P. Reduced-order nonlinear unsteady aerodynamic modeling using a surrogate-based recurrence framework. AIAA Journal, 48(10):2418–2429, 2010.Google Scholar

Goddard, Philip J and Glover, Keith. Controller approximation: approaches for preserving H_∞ performance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 43(7):858–871, 1998.Google Scholar

David, E Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms. Pearson Education India, 2006.Google Scholar

Golub, G. H. and Reinsch, C.. Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numerical Mathematics, 14:403–420, 1970.Google Scholar

Golub, Gene and Kahan, William. Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix. Journal of the Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, Series B: Numerical Analysis, 2(2):205–224, 1965.Google Scholar

Golub, Gene, Nash, Stephen, and Loan, Charles Van. A Hessenberg-Schur method for the problem ax + xb = c. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(6):909–913, 1979.Google Scholar

Golub, Gene H. and Van Loan, Charles F.. Matrix Computations, volume 3. JHU Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Garcia, R., Rico-Martinez, R., and Kevrekidis, I. G.. Identification of distributed parameter systems: A neural net based approach. Comp. & Chem. Eng., 22:S965–S968, 1998.Google Scholar

Goodfellow, Ian, Bengio, Yoshua, and Courville, Aaron. Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016. http://www.deeplearningbook.org.Google Scholar

Goodfellow, Ian, Pouget-Abadie, Jean, Mirza, Mehdi, Xu, Bing, Warde-Farley, David, Ozair, Sherjil, Courville, Aaron, and Bengio, Yoshua. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2672–2680, 2014.Google Scholar

Grant, Michael, Boyd, Stephen, and Ye, Yinyu. Cvx: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, 2008.Google Scholar

Graves, Alex, Wayne, Greg, and Danihelka, Ivo. Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401, 2014.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Anne. Iterative Methods for Solving Linear Systems. SIAM, 1997.Google Scholar

Grewal, Mohinder S.. filtering, Kalman. In International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pages 705–708. Springer, 2011.Google Scholar

Grilli, M., Schmid, P. J., Hickel, S., and Adams, N. A.. Analysis of unsteady behaviour in shockwave turbulent boundary layer interaction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 700:16–28, 2012.Google Scholar

Grosek, Jacob and Kutz, J. Nathan. Dynamic mode decomposition for real-time background/-foreground separation in video. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.7592, 2014.Google Scholar

Ming, Gu. Subspace iteration randomization and singular value problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 37(3):1139–1173, 2015.Google Scholar

Gueniat, F., Mathelin, L., and Pastur, L.. A dynamic mode decomposition approach for large and arbitrarily sampled systems. Physics of Fluids, 27(2):025113, 2015.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Fredrik, Gunnarsson, Fredrik, Bergman, Niclas, Forssell, Urban, Jansson, Jonas, Karlsson, Rickard, and Nordlund, P-J.. Particle filters for positioning, navigation, and tracking. IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 50(2):425–437, 2002.Google Scholar

Haar, Alfred. Zur theorie der orthogonalen funktionensysteme. Mathematische Annalen, 69(3):331–371, 1910.Google Scholar

Halko, N., Martinsson, P. G., and Tropp, J. A.. Finding structure with randomness: Probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions. SIAM Review, 53(2):217– 288, 2011.Google Scholar

Halko, Nathan, Martinsson, Per-Gunnar, Shkolnisky, Yoel, and Tygert, Mark. An algorithm for the principal component analysis of large data sets. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 33:2580–2594, 2011.Google Scholar

Halko, Nathan, Martinsson, Per-Gunnar, and Tropp, Joel A.. Finding structure with randomness: Probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions. SIAM Review, 53(2):217–288, 2011.Google Scholar

Hammarling, Sven J.. Numerical solution of the stable, non-negative definite Lyapunov equation. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 2(3):303–323, 1982.Google Scholar

Han, Sangbo and Feeny, Brian. Application of proper orthogonal decomposition to structural vibration analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 17(5):989–1001, 2003.Google Scholar

Hansen, Nikolaus, Niederberger, André S. P., Guzzella, Lino, and Koumoutsakos, Petros. A method for handling uncertainty in evolutionary optimization with an application to feedback control of combustion. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13(1):180–197, 2009.Google Scholar

Harrison, David Jr. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 5(1):81–102, 1978.Google Scholar

Harshman, Richard A.. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an “explanatory” multi-modal factor analysis. UCLA working papers in phonetics, 16:1–84, 1970. Available at www.psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/harshman/wpppfac0.pdf.Google Scholar

Hastie, Trevor, Tibshirani, Robert, Friedman, Jerome, Hastie, T, Friedman, J., and Tibshirani, R.. The Elements of Statistical Learning, volume 2. Springer, 2009.Google Scholar

He, Kaiming, Zhang, Xiangyu, Ren, Shaoqing, and Sun, Jian. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.Google Scholar

Heath, M. T., Laub, A. J., Paige, C. C., and Ward, R. C.. Computing the singular value decomposition of a product of two matrices. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 7(4):1147–1159, 1986.Google Scholar

Heideman, Michael, Johnson, Don, and Burrus, C. Gauss and the history of the fast Fourier transform. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 1(4):14–21, 1984.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, Werner. Über den anschaulichen inhalt der quantentheoretischen kinematik und mechanik. In Original Scientific Papers Wissenschaftliche Originalarbeiten, pages 478–504. Springer, 1985.Google Scholar

Hemati, Maziar S., Rowley, Clarence W., Deem, Eric A., and Cattafesta, Louis N.. De-biasing the dynamic mode decomposition for applied Koopman spectral analysis. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 31(4):349–368, 2017.Google Scholar

Hemati, Maziar S., Williams, Matthew O., and Rowley, Clarence W.. Dynamic mode decomposition for large and streaming datasets. Physics of Fluids (1994-present), 26(11):111701, 2014.Google Scholar

Herrity, Kyle K., Gilbert, Anna C., and Tropp, Joel A.. Sparse approximation via iterative thresholding. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2006. ICASSP 2006 Proceedings. 2006 IEEE International Conference on, volume 3, pages III–III. IEEE, 2006.Google Scholar

Hesthaven, Jan S., Rozza, Gianluigi, and Stamm, Benjamin. Certified reduced basis methods for parametrized partial differential equations. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, 2015.Google Scholar

Hey, Tony, Tansley, Stewart, Tolle, Kristin M., et al. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scien tific Discovery, volume 1. Microsoft research Redmond, WA, 2009.Google Scholar

Hinton, Geoffrey E. and Sejnowski, Terrence J.. Learning and releaming in boltzmann machines. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, 1(282-317):2, 1986.Google Scholar

Ho, B. L. and Kalman, R. E.. Effective construction of linear state-variable models from input/output data. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Allerton Conference on Circuit and System Theory, pages 449–459, 1965.Google Scholar

Hochreiter, Sepp and Schmidhuber, Jürgen. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997.Google Scholar

Hoerl, Arthur E. and Kennard, Robert W.. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1):55–67, 1970.Google Scholar

Holland, John H.. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence.University of Michigan Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L., Berkooz, G., and Rowley, C. W.. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd paperback edition, 2012.Google Scholar

Holmes, Philip and Guckenheimer, John. Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields, volume 42 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983.Google Scholar

Hopf, Eberhard. The partial differential equation u_t + uu_x = μu_xx. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 3(3):201–230, 1950.Google Scholar

Hopfield, John J.. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79(8):2554–2558, 1982.Google Scholar

Hornik, Kurt, Stinchcombe, Maxwell, and White, Halbert. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5):359–366, 1989.Google Scholar

Hotelling, H.. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24:417–441, September 1933.Google Scholar

Hotelling, H.. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24:498–520, October 1933.Google Scholar

Huang, C., Anderson, W. E., Harvazinski, M. E., and Sankaran, V.. Analysis of self-excited combustion instabilities using decomposition techniques. In 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, pages 1–18, 2013.Google Scholar

Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N.. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160:106–154, 1962.Google Scholar

Huber, Peter J.. Robust statistics. In International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pages 1248–1251. Springer, 2011.Google Scholar

Illingworth, S. J., Morgans, A. S., and Rowley, C. W.. Feedback control of flow resonances using balanced reduced-order models. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330(8):1567–1581, 2010.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Eric and Lyons, Richard. The sliding DFT. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 20(2):74–80, 2003.Google Scholar

Jaeger, Herbert and Haas, Harald. Harnessing nonlinearity: Predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science, 304(5667):78–80, 2004.Google Scholar

James, Gareth, Witten, Daniela, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Springer, 2013.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. C., Brunton, S. L., Kundtz, N. B., and Kutz, J. N.. Extremum-seeking control of a beam pattern of a reconfigurable holographic metamaterial antenna. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 33(1):59–68, 2016.Google Scholar

Richard, A. Johnson and Dean Wichern. Multivariate Analysis. Wiley Online Library, 2002.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. B and Lindenstrauss, J.. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space. Contemporary Mathematics, 26(189-206):1, 1984.Google Scholar

Jolliffe, Ian. Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Online Library, 2005.Google Scholar

Joshi, Siddharth and Boyd, Stephen. Sensor selection via convex optimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57(2):451–462, 2009.Google Scholar

Jovanović, Mihailo R., Schmid, Peter J., and Nichols, Joseph W.. Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition. Physics of Fluids, 26(2):024103, 2014.Google Scholar

Juang, J. N.. Applied System Identification. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1994.Google Scholar

Juang, J. N. and Pappa, R. S.. An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 8(5):620– 627, 1985.Google Scholar

Juang, J. N., Phan, M., Horta, L. G., and Longman, R. W.. Identification of observer/Kalman filter Markov parameters: Theory and experiments. Technical Memorandum 104069, NASA, 1991.Google Scholar

Julier, Simon J. and Uhlmann, Jeffrey K.. A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In Int. symp. aerospace/defense sensing, simul. and controls, volume 3, pages 182– 193. Orlando, FL, 1997.Google Scholar

Julier, Simon J. and Uhlmann, Jeffrey K.. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(3):401–422, 2004.Google Scholar

Kaiser, E., Kutz, J. N., and Brunton, S. L.. Data-driven discovery of Koopman eigenfunctions for control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01146, 2017.Google Scholar

Kaiser, Eurika, Kutz, J. Nathan, and Brunton, Steven L.. Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit. To appear in Proceedings of the Royal Society A. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05501, 2017.Google Scholar

Kaiser, Eurika, Noack, Bernd R., Cordier, Laurent, Spohn, Andreas, Segond, Marc, Abel, Markus, Daviller, Guillaume, Östh, Jan, Krajnović, Siniša, and Niven, Robert K. Cluster-based reduced-order modelling of a mixing layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 754:365–414, 2014.Google Scholar

Kalman, Rudolph Emil. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 82(1):35–45, 1960.Google Scholar

Karhunen, K.. Über lineare methoden in der wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, vol. 37. Annales AcademiæScientiarum Fennicæ, Ser. A. I, 1947.Google Scholar

Kasper, Kévin, Mathelin, Lionel, and Abou-Kandil, Hisham. A machine learning approach for constrained sensor placement. In American Control Conference (ACC), 2015, pages 4479– 4484. IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar

Kassam, A. K. and Trefethen, L. N.. Fourth-order time-stepping for stiff PDEs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26(4):1214–1233, 2005.Google Scholar

Kearns, Michael and Valiant, Leslie. Cryptographic limitations on learning boolean formulae and finite automata. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 41(1):67–95, 1994.Google Scholar

Kellems, Anthony R., Chaturantabut, Saifon, Sorensen, Danny C., and Cox, Steven J.. Morphologically accurate reduced order modeling of spiking neurons. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 28(3):477–494, 2010.Google Scholar

Kepler, J.. Tabulae Rudolphinae, quibus Astronomicae scientiae, temporum longinquitate collapsae Restauratio continetur. Ulm: Jonas Saur, 1627.Google Scholar

Kerschen, Gaëtan and Golinval, Jean-Claude. Physical interpretation of the proper orthogonal modes using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 249(5):849– 865, 2002.Google Scholar

Kerschen, Gaetan, Golinval, Jean-claude, Vakakis, Alexander F., and Bergman, Lawrence A.. The method of proper orthogonal decomposition for dynamical characterization and order reduction of mechanical systems: an overview. Nonlinear Dynamics, 41(1-3):147–169, 2005.Google Scholar

Kevrekidis, I. G., Gear, C. W., Hyman, J. M., Kevrekidis, P. G., Runborg, O., and Theodor-opoulos, C.. Equation-free, coarse-grained multiscale computation: Enabling microscopic simulators to perform system-level analysis. Communications in Mathematical Science, 1(4):715– 762, 2003.Google Scholar

Killingsworth, N. J. and Krstc, M.. PID tuning using extremum seeking: online, model-free performance optimization. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, February:70–79, 2006.Google Scholar

Kingma, Diederik P. and Welling, Max. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.Google Scholar

Kirby, M. and Sirovich, L.. Application of the Karhunen-Loève procedure for the characterization of human faces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 12(1):103–108, 1990.Google Scholar

Klema, V. C. and Laub, A. J.. The singular value decomposition: Its computation and some applications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 25(2):164–176, 1980.Google Scholar

Klus, Stefan, Nüske, Feliks, Koltai, Péter, Wu, Hao, Kevrekidis, Ioannis, Schütte, Christof, and Noé, Frank. Data-driven model reduction and transfer operator approximation. Journal of Nonlinear Science, pages 1–26, 2018.Google Scholar

Koch, Richard. The 80/20 Principle. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar

Koch, Richard. Living the 80/20 Way. Audio-Tech Business Book Summaries, Incorporated, 2006.Google Scholar

Koch, Richard. The 80/20 Principle: The Secret to Achieving More with Less. Crown Business, 2011.Google Scholar

Koch, Richard. The 80/20 Principle and 92 other Powerful Laws of Nature: the Science of Success. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar

Kohonen, Teuvo. The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing, 21(1-3):1–6, 1998.Google Scholar

Kolda, Tamara G. and Bader, Brett W.. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Review, 51(3):455–500, September 2009.Google Scholar

Koopman, B. O.. Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 17(5):315–318, 1931.Google Scholar

Koopman, B. O. and Neumann, J.-v.. Dynamical systems of continuous spectra. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 18(3):255, 1932.Google Scholar

Korda, Milan and Mezić, Igor. Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control. Automatica, 93:149–160, 2018.Google Scholar

Korda, Milan and Mezić, Igor. On convergence of extended dynamic mode decomposition to the Koopman operator. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28(2): 687–710, 2018.Google Scholar

Koumoutsakos, Petros, Freund, Jonathan, and Parekh, David. Evolution strategies for automatic optimization of jet mixing. AIAA Journal, 39(5):967–969, 2001.Google Scholar

Kowalski, Krzysztof, Steeb, Willi-Hans, and Kowalksi, K.. Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Carleman Linearization. World Scientific, 1991.Google Scholar

Koza, John R.. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, volume 1. MIT press, 1992.Google Scholar

Koza, John R., Bennett III, Forrest H., and Stiffelman, Oscar. Genetic programming as a darwinian invention machine. In Genetic Programming, pages 93–108. Springer, 1999.Google Scholar

Kramer, Boris, Grover, Piyush, Boufounos, Petros, Benosman, Mouhacine, and Nabi, Saleh. Sparse sensing and dmd based identification of flow regimes and bifurcations in complex flows. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16(2):1164–1196, 2017.Google Scholar

Krieger, J. P. and Krstic, M.. Extremum seeking based on atmospheric turbulence for aircraft endurance. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34(6):1876–1885, 2011.Google Scholar

Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Hinton, Geoffrey E.. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1097–1105, 2012.Google Scholar

Krstic, M., Krupadanam, A., and Jacobson, C.. Self-tuning control of a nonlinear model of combustion instabilities. IEEE Tr. Contr. Syst. Technol., 7(4):424–436, 1999.Google Scholar

Krstić, M. and Wang, H. H.. Stability of extremum seeking feedback for general nonlinear dynamic systems. Automatica, 36:595–601, 2000.Google Scholar

Kulkarni, Tejas D, Whitney, William F, Kohli, Pushmeet, and Tenenbaum, Josh. Deep convolutional inverse graphics network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2539–2547, 2015.Google Scholar

Kullback, Solomon and Leibler, Richard A. On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1):79–86, 1951.Google Scholar

Kunisch, Karl and Volkwein, Stefan. Optimal snapshot location for computing pod basis functions. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 44(3):509–529, 2010.Google Scholar

Kutz, J. N.. Data-Driven Modeling & Scientific Computation: Methods for Complex Systems & Big Data. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Kutz, J. N., Brunton, S. L., Brunton, B. W., and Proctor, J. L.. Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data-Driven Modeling of Complex Systems. SIAM, 2016.Google Scholar

Kutz, J. N., Fu, X., and Brunton, S. L.. Multi-resolution dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 15(2):713–735, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kutz, J. Nathan, Sargsyan, Syuzanna, and Brunton, Steven L. Leveraging sparsity and compressive sensing for reduced order modeling. In Model Reduction of Parametrized Systems, pages 301–315. Springer, 2017.Google Scholar

Lall, Sanjay, Marsden, Jerrold E., and Glavaški, Sonja. Empirical model reduction of controlled nonlinear systems. In IFAC World Congress, volume F, pages 473–478. International Federation of Automatic Control, 1999.Google Scholar

Lall, Sanjay, Marsden, Jerrold E., and Glavaški, Sonja. A subspace approach to balanced truncation for model reduction of nonlinear control systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 12(6):519–535, 2002.Google Scholar

Lan, Yueheng and Mezić, Igor. Linearization in the large of nonlinear systems and Koopman operator spectrum. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 242(1):42–53, 2013.Google Scholar

Laub, Alan. A Schur method for solving algebraic Riccati equations. IEEE Transactions on automatic control, 24(6):913–921, 1979.Google Scholar

LeCun, Yann, Bengio, Yoshua, and Hinton, Geoffrey. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436, 2015.Google Scholar

LeCun, Yann, Bottou, Léon, Bengio, Yoshua, and Haffner, Patrick. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278–2324, 1998.Google Scholar

Lee, Jay H.. Model predictive control: Review of the three decades of development. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 9(3):415–424, 2011.Google Scholar

Lee, K.C., Ho, J., and Kriegman, D.. Acquiring linear subspaces for face recognition under variable lighting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 27(5):684–698, 2005.Google Scholar

Legendre, Adrien Marie. Nouvelles méthodes pour la détermination des orbites des comètes. F. Didot, 1805.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, V., Kerschen, Gaëtan, and Golinval, Jean-Claude. Proper orthogonal decomposition for model updating of non-linear mechanical systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 15(1):31–43, 2001.Google Scholar

Lenz, Ian, Knepper, Ross A., and Saxena, Ashutosh. Deepmpc: Learning deep latent features for model predictive control. In Robotics: Science and Systems, 2015.Google Scholar

Leyva, R., Alonso, C., Queinnec, I., Cid-Pastor, A., Lagrange, D., and Martinez-Salamero, L.. MPPT of photovoltaic systems using extremum-seeking control. Ieee Transactions On Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42(1):249–258, January 2006.Google Scholar

Li, Qianxiao, Dietrich, Felix, Bollt, Erik M., and Kevrekidis, Ioannis G.. Extended dynamic mode decomposition with dictionary learning: A data-driven adaptive spectral decomposition of the Koopman operator. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 27(10):103111, 2017.Google Scholar

Liang, Y. C., Lee, H. P., Lim, S. P., Lin, W. Z., Lee, K. H., and Wu, C. G.. Proper orthogonal decomposition and its applications- part i: Theory. Journal of Sound and vibration, 252(3):527–544, 2002.Google Scholar

Liberty, Edo. Simple and deterministic matrix sketching. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 581– 588. ACM, 2013.Google Scholar

Liberty, Edo, Woolfe, Franco, Martinsson, Per-Gunnar, Rokhlin, Vladimir, and Tygert, Mark. Randomized algorithms for the low-rank approximation of matrices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104:20167–20172, 2007.Google Scholar

Lillicrap, Timothy P., Hunt, Jonathan J., Pritzel, Alexander, Heess, Nicolas, Erez, Tom, Tassa, Yuval, Silver, David, and Wierstra, Daan. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971, 2015.Google Scholar

Lin, Zhouchen, Chen, Minming, and Ma, Yi. The augmented lagrange multiplier method for exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices. arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.5055, 2010.Google Scholar

Ljung, L.. System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice Hall, 1999.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Stuart. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2):129–137, 1982.Google Scholar

Loeve, M.. Probability Theory. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1955.Google Scholar

Loiseau, J.-C. and Brunton, S. L.. Constrained sparse Galerkin regression. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 838:42–67, 2018.Google Scholar

Loiseau, J.-C., Noack, B. R., and Brunton, S. L.. Sparse reduced-order modeling: sensor-based dynamics to full-state estimation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 844:459–490, 2018.Google Scholar

Longman, Richard W.. Iterative learning control and repetitive control for engineering practice. International Journal of Control, 73(10):930–954, 2000.Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N.. Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather prediction. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, December 1956.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Edward N.. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20(2):130–141, 1963.Google Scholar

Luchtenburg, D. M. and Rowley, C. W.. Model reduction using snapshot-based realizations. Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 56, 2011.Google Scholar

Lumley, J. L.. Toward a turbulent constitutive relation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 41(02):413–434, 1970.Google Scholar

Lusch, Bethany, Chi, Eric C., and Kutz, J. Nathan. Shape constrained tensor decompositions using sparse representations in over-complete libraries. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.04674, 2016.Google Scholar

Bethany Lusch, J. Nathan Kutz, and Steven L. Brunton. Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamics. Nature Communications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.09707, 2018.Google Scholar

Lusseyran, F., Gueniat, F., Basley, J., Douay, C. L., Pastur, L. R., Faure, T. M., and Schmid, P. J.. Flow coherent structures and frequency signature: application of the dynamic modes decomposition to open cavity flow. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 318, page 042036. IOP Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Ma, Z., Ahuja, S., and Rowley, C. W.. Reduced order models for control of fluids using the eigensystem realization algorithm. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 25(1):233–247, 2011.Google Scholar

Maass, Wolfgang, Natschläger, Thomas, and Markram, Henry. Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Computation, 14(11):2531–2560, 2002.Google Scholar

Mackey, Alan, Schaeffer, Hayden, and Osher, Stanley. On the compressive spectral method. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 12(4):1800–1827, 2014.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Michael W.. Randomized algorithms for matrices and data. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 3:123–224, 2011.Google Scholar

Majda, Andrew J. and Harlim, John. Physics constrained nonlinear regression models for time series. Nonlinearity, 26(1):201, 2012.Google Scholar

Majda, Andrew J. and Lee, Yoonsang. Conceptual dynamical models for turbulence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(18):6548–6553, 2014.Google Scholar

Mallat, Stéphane. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Mallat, Stéphane. Understanding deep convolutional networks. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 374(2065):20150203, 2016.Google Scholar

Mallat, Stephane G.. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(7):674– 693, 1989.Google Scholar

Mandel, John. Use of the singular value decomposition in regression analysis. The American Statistician, 36(1):15–24, 1982.Google Scholar

Mangan, Niall M., Brunton, Steven L., Proctor, Joshua L., and Kutz, J. Nathan. Inferring biological networks by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological, and Multi-Scale Communications, 2(1):52–63, 2016.Google Scholar

Mangan, Niall M., Kutz, J. Nathan, Brunton, Steven L., and Proctor, Joshua L.. Model selection for dynamical systems via sparse regression and information criteria. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 473(2204):1–16, 2017.Google Scholar

Mann, Jordan and Kutz, J. Nathan. Dynamic mode decomposition for financial trading strategies. Quantitative Finance, pages 1–13, 2016.Google Scholar

Manohar, K., Brunton, S. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Environmental identification in flight using sparse approximation of wing strain. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 70:162–180, 2017.Google Scholar

Manohar, K., Kutz, J. N., and Brunton, S. L.. Greedy Sensor and Actuator Placement Using Balanced Model Reduction. Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 2018.Google Scholar

Manohar, Krithika, Brunton, Bingni W., Kutz, J. Nathan, and Brunton, Steven L.. Data-driven sparse sensor placement. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 38:63–86, 2018Google Scholar

Manohar, Krithika, Kaiser, Eurika, Brunton, S. L., and Kutz, J. N.. Optimized sampling for multiscale dynamics. SIAM Multiscale Modeling and Simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05085, 2017.Google Scholar

Mardt, Andreas, Pasquali, Luca, Wu, Hao, and Noé, Frank. VAMPnets: Deep learning of molecular kinetics. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2018.Google Scholar

Marsden, J. E. and Ratiu, T. S.. Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry. Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition, 1999.Google Scholar

Per-Gunnar, Martinsson. Randomized methods for matrix computations and analysis of high dimensional data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.01649, 2016.Google Scholar

Martinsson, Per-Gunnar, Rokhlin, Vladimir, and Tygert, Mark. A randomized algorithm for the decomposition of matrices. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 30:47–68, 2011.Google Scholar

Maryak, John L., Spall, James C., and Heydon, Bryan D.. Use of the Kalman filter for inference in state-space models with unknown noise distributions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(1):87–90, 2004.Google Scholar

Massa, L., Kumar, R., and Ravindran, P.. Dynamic mode decomposition analysis of detonation waves. Physics of Fluids (1994-present), 24(6):066101, 2012.Google Scholar

Mathelin, Lionel, Kasper, Kévin, and Abou-Kandil, Hisham. Observable dictionary learning for high-dimensional statistical inference. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 25(1):103–120, 2018.Google Scholar

Maury, R., Keonig, M., Cattafesta, L., Jordan, P., and Delville, J.. Extremum-seeking control of jet noise. Aeroacoustics, 11(3&4):459–474, 2012.Google Scholar

Mezić, I.. Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions. Nonlinear Dynamics, 41(1-3):309–325, 2005.Google Scholar

Mezić, I.. Analysis of fluid flows via spectral properties of the Koopman operator. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 45:357–378, 2013.Google Scholar

Mezić, I.. Spectral Operator Methods in Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications. Springer, 2017.Google Scholar

Mezić, Igor and Banaszuk, Andrzej. Comparison of systems with complex behavior. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 197(1):101–133, 2004.Google Scholar

Mezić, Igor and Wiggins, Stephen. A method for visualization of invariant sets of dynamical systems based on the ergodic partition. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 9(1):213–218, 1999.Google Scholar

Milano, Michele and Koumoutsakos, Petros. Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 182(1):1–26, 2002.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. M.. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, 1997.Google Scholar

Mizuno, Y., Duke, D., Atkinson, C., and Soria, J.. Investigation of wall-bounded turbulent flow using dynamic mode decomposition. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 318, page 042040. IOP Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Mnih, Volodymyr, Badia, Adria Puigdomenech, Mirza, Mehdi, Graves, Alex, Lillicrap, Timothy, Harley, Tim, Silver, David, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1928–1937, 2016.Google Scholar

Mnih, Volodymyr, Kavukcuoglu, Koray, Silver, David, Graves, Alex, Antonoglou, Ioannis, Wierstra, Daan, and Riedmiller, Martin. Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602, 2013.Google Scholar

Mnih, Volodymyr, Kavukcuoglu, Koray, Silver, David, Rusu, Andrei A., Veness, Joel, Bellemare, Marc G., Graves, Alex, Riedmiller, Martin, Fidjeland, Andreas K., Georg Ostrovski, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529, 2015.Google Scholar

Moeck, J. P., Bourgouin, J.-F., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S.. Tomographic reconstruction of heat release rate perturbations induced by helical modes in turbulent swirl flames. Experiments in Fluids, 54(4):1–17, 2013.Google Scholar

Moore, B. C.. Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-26(1):17–32, 1981.Google Scholar

Moore, Calvin C.. Ergodic theorem, ergodic theory, and statistical mechanics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(7):1907–1911, 2015.Google Scholar

Moore, Kevin L.. Iterative Learning Control for Deterministic Systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.Google Scholar

Morari, Manfred and Lee, Jay H.. Model predictive control: past, present and future. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23(4):667–682, 1999.Google Scholar

Muld, T. W., Efraimsson, G., and Henningson, D. S.. Flow structures around a high-speed train extracted using proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition. Computers & Fluids, 57:87–97, 2012.Google Scholar

Muld, T. W., Efraimsson, G., and Henningson, D. S.. Mode decomposition on surface-mounted cube. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 88(3):279–310, 2012.Google Scholar

Müller, S. D., Milano, M, and Koumoutsakos, P.. Application of machine learning algorithms to flow modeling and optimization. Annual Research Briefs, pages 169–178, 1999.Google Scholar

Munteanu, Iulian, Bratcu, Antoneta Iuliana, and Ceanga, Emil. Wind turbulence used as searching signal for MPPT in variable-speed wind energy conversion systems. Renewable Energy, 34(1):322–327, January 2009.Google Scholar

Kevin, P. Murphy. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. MIT press, 2012.Google Scholar

Nair, Vinod and Hinton, Geoffrey E.. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), pages 807–814, 2010.Google Scholar

Needell, D. and Tropp, J. A.. CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Communications of the ACM, 53(12):93–100, 2010.Google Scholar

Neumann, J. v. Proof of the quasi-ergodic hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18(1):70–82, 1932.Google Scholar

Nguyen, N. C., Patera, A. T., and Peraire, J.. A best points interpolation method for efficient approximation of parametrized functions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 73(4):521–543, 2008.Google Scholar