Akers, A. A., Islam, M. A., and Nijman, V. 2013. Habitat characterization of western hoolock gibbons Hoolock hoolock by examining home range microhabitat use. Primates 54: 341–348.Google Scholar

Anderson, D. J. 1982. The home range: a new nonparametric estimation technique. Ecology 63: 103–112.Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. Q. 2007. The Hylobatidae: small apes of Asia. Pages 274–289 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bearder, S. 1987. Lorises, bushbabies, and tarsiers: diverse societies in solitary foragers. Pages 11–24 in Primate Societies. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Beyer, H. L. 2010. Geospatial modeling environment for ArcGIS. Available at: www.spatialecology.com/gme.Google Scholar

Biebouw, K. 2009. Home range size and use in Allocebus trichotis in Analamazaotra Special Reserve, Central Eastern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 30: 367–386.Google Scholar

Blair, W. F. 1942. Size of home range and notes on the life history of the woodland deer-mouse and eastern chipmunk in northern Michigan. Journal of Mammalogy 23: 27–36.Google Scholar

Blundell, F. M., Maier, J. A. K., and Debevec, E. M. 2001. Linear home ranges: effects of smoothing, sample size, and autocorrelation on kernel estimates. Ecological Monographs 71: 469–489.Google Scholar

Börger, L., Franconi, N., De Michelle, G., et al. 2006. Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1393–1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyle, S. A. and Smith, A. T. 2010a. Behavioral modifications in northern bearded saki monkeys (Chiropotes satanas chiropotes) in forest fragments of central Amazonia. Primates 51: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyle, S. A. and Smith, A. T. 2010b. Can landscape and species characteristics predict primate presence in forest fragments in the Brazilian Amazon? Biological Conservation 143: 1134–1143.Google Scholar

Boyle, S. A., Lourenço, W. C., da Silva, L. R., and Smith, A. T. 2009a. Travel and spatial patterns change when northern bearded saki monkeys (Chiropotes satanas chiropotes) live in forest fragments. International Journal of Primatology 30: 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, S. A., Lourenço, W. C., da Silva, L. R., and Smith, A. T. 2009b. Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods. Folia Primatologica 80: 33–42.Google Scholar

Burt, W. H. 1940. Territorial behavior and populations of small mammals in southern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 45: 1–58.Google Scholar

Burt, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 24: 346–352.Google Scholar

Calenge, C. 2006. The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197: 516–519.Google Scholar

Campbell-Smith, G., Campbell-Smith, M., Singleton, I., and Linkie, M. 2011. Apes in space: saving an imperiled orangutan population in Sumatra. PLoS ONE 6: e17210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campos, F. A. and Fedigan, L. M. 2009. Behavioral adaptations to heat stress and water scarcity in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 138: 101–111.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. 1988. Patterns of foraging and range use by three species of Neotropical primates. Primates 29: 177–194.Google Scholar

Chaves, O. M., Stoner, K. E., and Arroyo-Rodríguez, V. 2011. Seasonal differences in activity patterns of Geoffroyi’s spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) living in continuous and fragmented forests in southern Mexico. International Journal of Primatology 32: 960–973.Google Scholar

Cresswell, W. J. and Smith, G. C. 1992. The effects of temporally autocorrelated data on methods of home range analysis. Pages 272–284 in Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals. Priede, I. G. and Swift, S. M. (Eds.). Ellis Horwood, London.Google Scholar

Cumming, G. S. and Cornélis, D. 2012. Quantitative comparison and selection of home range metrics for telemetry data. Diversity and Distributions 18: 1057–1065.Google Scholar

Cushman, S. A., Chase, M., and Griffin, C. 2005. Elephants in space and time. Oikos 109: 331–341.Google Scholar

de Solla, S. R., Bonduriansky, R., and Brooks, R. J. 1999. Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Fiore, A. and Campbell, C. J. 2007. The Atelines: variation in ecology, behavior, and social organization. Pages 155–185 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Digby, L. J., Ferrari, S. F., and Saltzman, W. 2007. Callitrichines: the role of competition in cooperatively breeding species. Pages 85–106 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dixon, K. R. and Chapman, J. A. 1980. Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology 61: 1040–1044.Google Scholar

Ecological Software Solutions, LLC. 2013. Biotas. Software.Google Scholar

Enstam, K. L. and Isbell, L. A. (2007. The guenons (genus Cercopithecus) and their allies: behavioral ecology of polyspecific associations. Pages 252–274 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

ESRI 2013. ArcGIS 10.X. Software.Google Scholar

Fashing, P. J. 2007. African colobine monkeys: patterns of between-group interaction. Pages 201–224 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fashing, P. J., Mulindahabi, F., Gakima, J. B., et al. 2007. Activity and ranging patterns of Colobus angolensis ruwenzorii in Nyungwe Forest, Rwanda: possible costs of large group size. International Journal of Primatology 28: 529–550.Google Scholar

Fedigan, L. M., Fedigan, L., Chapman, C., and Glander, K. E. 1988. Spider monkey home ranges: a comparison of radio telemetry and direct observation. American Journal of Primatology 16: 19–29.Google Scholar

Fernandez-Duque, E. 2007. Aotinae: social monogramy in the only nocturnal haplorhines. Pages 139–154 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fieberg, J. 2007a. Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. Ecology 88: 1059–1066.Google Scholar

Fieberg, J. 2007b. Utilization distribution estimation using weighted kernel density estimators. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 1669–1675.Google Scholar

Fieberg, J. and Börger, L. B. 2012. Could you please phrase “home range” as a question? Journal of Mammalogy 93: 890–902.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A., Pruetz, J. D., and Isaacson, J. 1993. Patterns of range use, range defense, and intergroup spacing in moustached tamarin monkeys (Saguinus mystax). Primates 34: 11–25.Google Scholar

Gerber, B. D., Arrigo-Nelson, S., Karpanty, S. M., Kotschwar, M., and Wright, P. C. 2012. Spatial ecology of the endangered Milne-Edwards’ sifaka (Propithecus edwardsi): do logging and season affect home range and daily ranging patterns? International Journal of Primatology 33: 305–321.Google Scholar

Getz, W. M. and Wilmers, C. C. 2004. A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions. Ecography 27: 489–505.Google Scholar

Getz, W. M., Fortmann-Roe, S., Cross, P. C., et al. 2007. LoCoH: nonparametric kernel methods for constructing home range and utilization distributions. PLoS ONE 2: e207.Google Scholar

Girard, I., Ouellet, J. P., Courtois, R., Dussault, C., and Breton, L. 2002. Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations. Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 1290–1300.Google Scholar

Gitzen, R. A. and Millspaugh, J. J. 2003. Comparison of least-squares cross-validation bandwidth options for kernel home-range estimation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31: 823–831.Google Scholar

Gould, L. and Sauther, M. 2007. Lemuriformes. Pages 46–72 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Grueter, C. C., Li, D., Ren, B., and Wei, F. 2009. Choice of analytical method can have dramatic effects on primate home range estimates. Primates 50: 81–84.Google Scholar

Gula, R. and Theuerkauf, J. 2013. The need for standardization in wildlife science: home range estimators as an example. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59: 713–718.Google Scholar

Gursky, S. 2007. Tarsiiformes. Pages 73–85 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hadi, S., Ziegler, T., Waltert, M., et al. 2012. Habitat use and trophic niche overlap of two sympatric colobines, Presbytis potenziani and Simias concolor, on Siberut Island, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 33: 218–232.Google Scholar

Harris, T. R. and Chapman, C. A. 2007. Variation in diet and ranging of black and white colobus monkeys in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates 48: 208–221.Google Scholar

Haugen, A. O. 1942. Home range of cottontail rabbit. Ecology 23: 354–367.Google Scholar

Hayne, D. W. 1949. Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy 30: 1–18.Google Scholar

Hemingway, C. A. and Bynum, N. 2005. The influence of seasonality on primate diet and ranging. Pages 57–104 in Seasonality in Primates: Studies of Living and Extinct Human and Non-human Primates. Brockman, D. K. and van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hemson, G., Johnson, P., South, A., et al. 2005. Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggest problems for kernel home range analyses with least-squares-cross-validation. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 455–463.Google Scholar

Henzi, S. P., Brown, L. R., Barrett, L., and Marais, A. J. 2011. Troop size, habitat use, and diet of chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus) in commercial pine plantations: implications for management. International Journal of Primatology 32: 1020–1032.Google Scholar

Herbinger, I., Boesch, C., and Rothe, H. 2001. Territory characteristics among three neighboring chimpanzee communities in the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Primatology 22: 143–167.Google Scholar

Hoffman, T. S. and O’Riain, M. J. 2011. The spatial ecology of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) in a human-modified environment. International Journal of Primatology 32: 308–328.Google Scholar

Hooge, P. N. and Eichenlaub, B. 2000. Animal movement extension to ArcView. Ver. 2.0. Alaska Science Center, Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK.Google Scholar

Horne, J. S. and Garton, E. O. 2006a. Likelihood cross-validation versus least squares cross-validation for choosing the smoothing parameter in kernel home range analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 641–648.Google Scholar

Horne, J. S. and Garton, E. O. 2006b. Selecting the best home range model: an information theoretic approach. Ecology 87: 1146–1152.Google Scholar

Horne, J. S. and Garton, E. O. 2009. Animal space use 1.3. Available at: www.cnr.uidaho.edu/population_ecology/animal_space_use.htm.Google Scholar

Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., Krone, S. S., and Lewis, J. L. 2007. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88: 2354–2363.Google Scholar

Huck, M., Davison, J., and Roper, T. J. 2008. Comparison of two sampling protocols and four home-range estimators using radio-tracking data from urban badgers Meles meles. Wildlife Biology 14: 467–477.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T. 2008. Diademed sifaka (Propithecus diadema) ranging and habitat use in continuous and fragmented forest: higher density but lower viability in fragments? Biotropica 40: 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Olupot, W., Chancellor, R. L., Arlet, M. E., and Waser, P. M. 2009. Long-term site fidelity and individual home range shifts in Lophocebus albigena. International Journal of Primatology 30: 443–466.Google Scholar

Jennrich, R. I. and Turner, F. B. 1969. Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22: 227–237.Google Scholar

Kie, J. G., Matthiopoulos, J., Fieberg, J., et al. 2010. The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 2221–2231.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, R. C. 2007. The Asian colobines: diversity among leaf-eating monkeys. Pages 186–200 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Knight, C. M., Kenward, R. E., Gozlan, R. E., et al. 2009. Home range estimation within complex restricted environments: importance of method selection in detecting seasonal change. Wildlife Research 36: 213–224.Google Scholar

Lahann, P. 2008. Habitat utilization of three sympatric cheirogaleid lemur species in a littoral rain forest of southeastern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 29: 117–134.Google Scholar

Laver, P. N. and Kelly, M. J. 2008. A critical review of home range studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 290–298.Google Scholar

Lawson, E. J. G. and Rodgers, A. R. 1997. Differences in home-range size computed in commonly used software programs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 721–729.Google Scholar

Lehmann, J. and Boesch, C. 2003. Social influences on ranging patterns among chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Behavioral Ecology 14: 642–649.Google Scholar

Li, Y., Jiang, Z., Li, C., and Grueter, C. C. 2010. Effects of seasonal folivory and frugivory on ranging patterns in Rhinopithecus roxellana. International Journal of Primatology 31: 609–626.Google Scholar

Lichti, N. I. and Swihart, R. K. 2011. Estimating utilization distributions with kernel versus local convex hull methods. Journal of Wildlife Management 75: 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, J. A. and Nelson, T. A. 2012. Time geography and wildlife home range delineation. Journal of Wildlife Management 76: 407–413.Google Scholar

Lyons, A. J., Turner, W. C., and Getz, W. M. 2013. Home range plus: a space-time characterization of movement over real landscapes. Movement Ecology 1: 2.Google Scholar

Matsuda, I., Tuuga, A., and Higashi, S. 2009. Ranging behavior of proboscis monkeys in a riverine forest with special reference to ranging in inland forest. International Journal of Primatology 30: 313–325.Google Scholar

Mekonnen, A., Bekele, A., Fashing, P. L., Hemson, G., and Atickem, A. 2010. Diet, activity patterns, and ranging ecology of the bale monkey (Chlorocebus djamdjamensis) in Odobullu Forest, Ethiopia. International Journal of Primatology 31: 339–362.Google Scholar

Merker, S. 2006. Habitat-specific ranging patterns of Dian’s tarsiers (Tarsius dianae) as revealed by radiotracking. American Journal of Primatology 68: 111–125.Google Scholar

Milton, K. and May, M. L. 1976. Body weight, diet and home range area in primates. Nature 259: 459–462.Google Scholar

Mochizuki, S. and Murakami, T. 2013. Scale dependent effects in resource selection by crop-raiding Japanese macaques in Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Applied Geography 42: 13–22.Google Scholar

Mohr, C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. The American Midland Naturalist 37: 223–449.Google Scholar

Moorcroft, P. R. 2012. Mechanistic approaches to understanding and predicting mammalian space use: recent advances, future directions. Journal of Mammalogy 93: 903–916.Google Scholar

Moorcroft, P. R. and Lewis, M. A. 2006. Mechanistic Home Range Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Moorcroft, P. R., Lewis, M. A., and Crabtree, R. L. 1999. Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model. Ecology: 80: 1656–1665.Google Scholar

Nekaris, A. and Bearder, S. K. 2007. The lorisiform primates of Asia and mainland Africa: diversity shrouded in darkness. Pages 24–45 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Neri-Arboleda, I., Stott, P., and Arboleda, N. P. 2002. Home ranges, spatial movements and habitat associations of the Philippine tarsier (Tarsius syrichta) in Corella, Bohol. Journal of Zoology 257: 387–402.Google Scholar

Newton-Fisher, N. E. 2003. The home range of the Sonso community of chimpanzees from the Budongo Forest, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 41: 150–156.Google Scholar

Norconk, M. A. 2007. Sakis, uakaris, and titi monkeys: behavioral diversity in a radiation of primate seed predators. Pages 123–138 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Norscia, I. and Borgognini-Tarli, S. M. 2008. Ranging behavior and possible correlates of pair-living in southeastern avahis (Madagascar). International Journal of Primatology 29: 153–171.Google Scholar

Ostro, L. E. T., Young, T. P., Silver, S. C., and Koontz, F. W. 1999. A geographic information system method for estimating home range size. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 748–755.Google Scholar

Otis, D. L. and White, G. C. 1999. Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 1039–1044.Google Scholar

Palminteri, S. and Peres, C. A. 2012. Habitat selection and use of space by bald-faced sakis (Pithecia irrorata) in southwestern Amazonia: lessons from a multiyear, multigroup study. International Journal of Primatology 33: 401–417.Google Scholar

Pebsworth, P. A., MacIntosh, A. J. J., Morgan, H. R., and Huffman, M. A. 2012a. Factors influencing the ranging behavior of chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus) living in a human-modified habitat. International Journal of Primatology 33: 872–887.Google Scholar

Pebsworth, P. A., Morgan, H. R., and Huffman, M. A. 2012b. Evaluating home range techniques: use of global positioning system (GPS) collar data from chacma baboons. Primates 53: 345–355.Google Scholar

Pimley, E. R., Bearder, S. K., and Dixson, A. F. 2005. Home range analysis of Perodicticus potto edwardsi and Sciurocheirus cameronensis. International Journal of Primatology 26: 191–206.Google Scholar

Porter, L. M., Sterr, S. M., and Garber, P. A. 2007. Habitat use and ranging behavior of Callimico goeldii. International Journal of Primatology 28: 1035–1058.Google Scholar

Powell, R. A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. Pages 65–110 in Research Technologies in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Boitani, L. and Fuller, T. K. (Eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Powell, R. A. and Mitchell, M. S. 2012. What is a home range? Journal of Mammalogy 93: 948–958.Google Scholar

Pyritz, L. W., Kappeler, P. M., and Fichtel, C. 2011. Coordination of group movements in wild red-fronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons): processes and influence of ecological and reproductive seasonality. International Journal of Primatology 32: 1325–1347.Google Scholar

Raboy, B. E. and Dietz, J. M. 2004. Diet, foraging, and use of space in wild golden-headed lion tamarins. American Journal of Primatology 63: 1–15.Google Scholar

Ramos-Fernández, G., Aguilar, S. E. S., Schaffner, C. M., Vick, L. G., and Aureli, F. 2013. Site fidelity in space use by spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. PLoS ONE 8: e62813.Google Scholar

Ren, B., Li, M., Long, Y., Wu, R., and Wei, F. 2009. Home range and seasonality of Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys. Integrative Zoology 4: 162–171.Google Scholar

Robbins, M. M. 2007. Gorillas: diversity in ecology and behavior. Pages 305–321 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Robbins, M. M. and McNeilage, A. 2003. Home range and frugivory patterns of mountain gorillas in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology 24: 467–491.Google Scholar

Rodgers, A. R. and Carr, A. P. 1998. HRE: the Home Range Extension for ArcView. Thunder Bay, Ontario: Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario.Google Scholar

Rodgers, A. R., Carr, A. P., Beyer, H. L., Smith, L., and Kie, J. G. 2007. HRT: Home Range Tools for ArcGIS. Version 1.1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario.Google Scholar

Row, J. R. and Blouin-Demers, G. 2006. Kernels are not accurate estimators of home-range size for herpetofauna. Copeia 4: 797–802.Google Scholar

Sawyer, S. C. 2012. Subpopulation range estimation for conservation planning: a case study of the critically endangered Cross River gorilla. Biodiversity and Conservation 21: 1589–1606.Google Scholar

Scull, P., Palmer, M., Frey, F., and Kraly, E. 2012. A comparison of two home range modeling methods using Ugandan mountain gorilla data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26: 2111–2121.Google Scholar

Seaman, D. E. and Powell, R. A. 1996. An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77: 2075–2085.Google Scholar

Seaman, D. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Kernohan, B. J., et al. 1999. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 739–747.Google Scholar

Shaffer, C. A. 2013. Ecological correlates of ranging behavior in bearded sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus) in a continuous forest in Guyana. International Journal of Primatology 34: 515–532.Google Scholar

Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar

Siniff, D. B. and Tester, J. R. 1965. Computer analysis of animal movement data obtained by telemetry. BioScience 15: 104–108.Google Scholar

Spehar, S. N., Link, A., and Di Fiore, A. 2010. Male and female range use in a group of white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth) in Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. American Journal of Primatology 72: 129–141.Google Scholar

Spencer, W. D. 2012. Home range and the value of spatial information. Journal of Mammalogy 93: 929–947.Google Scholar

Steiniger, S. and Hunter, A. J. S. 2012. OpenJUMP HoRAE: a free GIS and toolbox for home range analysis. Wildlife Society Bulletin 36: 600–608.Google Scholar

Steiniger, S. and Hunter, A. J. S. 2013. A scaled line-based kernel density estimator for the retrieval of utilization distributions and home ranges from GPS movement tracks. Ecological Informatics 13: 1–8.Google Scholar

Sterling, E., Nguyen, N., and Fashing, P. 2000. Spatial patterning in nocturnal prosimians: a review of methods and relevance to studies of sociality. American Journal of Primatology 51: 3–19.Google Scholar

Stumpf, R. 2007. Chimpanzees and bonobos: diversity within and between species. Pages 321–344 in Primates in Perspective. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., and Bearder, S. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Swihart, R. K. and Slade, N. A. 1985. Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66: 1176–1184.Google Scholar

Swihart, R. K. and Slade, N. A. 1997. On testing for independence of animal movements. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2: 48–63.Google Scholar

Takasaki, H. 1981. Troop size, habitat quality, and home range area in Japanese macaques. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9: 277–281.Google Scholar

Tsuji, Y. and Takatsuki, S. 2009. Effects of yearly change in nut fruiting on autumn home-range use by Macaca fuscata on Kinkazan Island, northern Japan. International Journal of Primatology 30: 169–181.Google Scholar

Volampeno, M. S. N., Masters, J. C., and Downs, C. T. 2011. Home range size in the blue-eyed black lemur (Eulemur flavifrons): a comparison between dry and wet seasons. Mammalian Biology 76: 157–164.Google Scholar

Walter, W. D., Fischer, J. W., Baruch-Mordo, S., and VerCauteren, K. C. 2011. What is the proper method to delineate home range of an animal using today’s advanced GPS telemetry systems: the initial step. Pages 249–268 in Modern Telemetry. Krejcar, O. (Ed.). InTech Open Access Publisher, London.Google Scholar

Wartmann, F. M., Purves, R. S., and van Schaik, C. P. 2010. Modelling ranging behavior of female orang-utans: a case study in Tuanan, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Primates 51: 119–130.Google Scholar

Wauters, L. A., Preatoni, D. G., Molinari, A. and Tosi, G. 2007. Radio tracking squirrels: performance of home range density and linkage estimators with small range and sample size. Ecological Modelling 3 -4: 333–344.Google Scholar

Weber, K. T., Burcham, M., and Marcum, C. L. 2001. Assessing independence of animal locations with association matrices. Journal of Range Management 54: 21–24.Google Scholar

White, E. C., Dikangadissi, J. T., Dimoto, E., et al. 2010. Home-range use by a large horde of wild Mandrillus sphinx. International Journal of Primatology 31: 627–645.Google Scholar

Willems, E. P. and Hill, R. A. 2009. Predator-specific landscapes of fear and resource distribution: effects on spatial range use. Ecology 90: 546–555.Google Scholar

Worton, B. J. 1987. A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecological Modelling 38: 277–298.Google Scholar

Worton, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.Google Scholar

Worton, B. J. 1995. Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 794–800.Google Scholar

Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.Google Scholar

Anderson, D. P., Nordheim, E. V., Boesch, C., and Moermond, T. C. 2002. Factors Influencing Fission-Fusion Grouping in Chimpanzees in the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire: Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association: LISA. Geographical Analysis 27: 93–115.Google Scholar

Baily, T. C. and Gatrell, A. C. 1995. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman, New York.Google Scholar

Boyle, S. A., Lourenco, W. C., da Silva, L. R., and Smith, A. T. 2009. Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods. Folia Primatologica 80: 33–42.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. W., Whiten, A., and Henzi, S. P. 1990. Measuring the food constraints of mountain baboons. Pages 105–122 in Baboons: Behavior and Ecology, Use and Care. de Mello, M. T., Whiten, A., and Byrne, R. W.. International Primatological Society, Brazil.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. A. 1988. Patterns of foraging and range use by three species of neotropical primates. Primates 29(2): 177–194.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. A. 1990. Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates. Folia Primatologica 55: 1–9.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. A. and Chapman, L. J. 2000. Determinants of group size in social primates: the importance of travel costs. Pages 24–42 in On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. Boinski, S. and Garber, P. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J., Wrangham, R., Gebo, D., and Gardner, L. 1992. Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24: 527–531.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. A., White, F., Wrangham, R. W. 1994. Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos: a reevaluation of theory based on two similarly forested sites. Pages 45–57 in Chimpanzee Cultures. McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and Nishida, T. (Eds.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. A., Wrangham, R. W., and Chapman, L. J. 1995. Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 59–70.Google Scholar

Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology 9: 129–136.Google Scholar

Clark, P. J. and Evans, F. C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445–453Google Scholar

Coder, K. D. 2000. Crown Shape Factors & Volumes. University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forest Resources, Athens, GA.Google Scholar

Coleman, B. T. and Hill, R. A. 2014. Living in a landscape of fear: the impact of predation, resource availability and habitat structure on primate range use. Animal Behaviour 88: 165–173.Google Scholar

Dale, M. R. T. 1999. Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dale, M. R. T. and Powell, R. D. 2001. A new method for characterizing point patterns in plant ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 12(5): 597–608.Google Scholar

Dale, M. R. T., Dixon, P. M., Fortin, M. J., et al. 2002. Conceptual and mathematical relationships among methods for spatial analysis. Ecography 25: 558–577.Google Scholar

Dammhahn, M. and Kappeler, P. M. 2008. Comparative feeding ecology of sympatric Microcebus berthae and M. murinus. International Journal of Primatology 29(6): 1567.Google Scholar

De Knegt, H. J., van Langevelde, F., Coughenour, M. B., et al. 2010. Spatial autocorrelation and the scaling of species–environment relationships. Ecology 91: 2455–2465.Google Scholar

Dias, L. G. and Strier, K. B. 2003. Effects of group size on ranging patterns in Brachyteles arachnoides hypoxanthus. International Journal of Primatology 24: 209–221.Google Scholar

Di Fiore, A. 1997. Ecology and behavior of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii, Atelinae) in Eastern Ecuador. PhD Thesis. University of California, Davis.Google Scholar

Diggle, P. J. 1983. The Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Dixon, P. M. 2002. Ripley’s K function. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 3: 1796–1803.Google Scholar

Drake, J. B., Dubayah, R. O., Knox, , et al. 2002. Sensitivity of large-footprint Lidar to canopy structure and biomass in a neotropical rainforest. Remote Sensing of Environment. 81: 378–392.Google Scholar

Ebdon, D. 1985. Statistics in Geography. Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., and Leese, M. 2001. Cluster Analysis, 4th edition. Arnold, London.Google Scholar

Fatoyinbo, L. 2012. Remote Sensing of Biomass: Principles and Applications. Intech, London.Google Scholar

Furnival, G. M. 1961. An index comparing equations used in constructing volume equations. Forestry Science 7: 337–341.Google Scholar

Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fortin, M., Mark, M. J., and Dale, R. T. 2005. Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fourrier, M. S. 2013. The spatial and temporal ecology of seed dispersal by gorillas in Lopé National Park, Gabon: linking patterns of disperser behavior and recruitment in an Afrotropical forest. Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar

Freeman, E. A. and Ford, E. D. 2002. Effects of data quality on analysis of ecological pattern using the K(d) statistical function. Ecology 83: 35–46.Google Scholar

Fruth, B. and Hohmann, G. 1996. Nest building behavior in the great apes: the great leap forward. Pages 225–240 in Great Ape Societies. McGrew, W., Marchant, L., and Nishida, T. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Haase, P. 1995. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley’s K-function: introduction and methods of edge correction. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 575–582.Google Scholar

Haase, P. 2001. Can isotropy vs. anisotropy in the spatial association of plant species reveal physical vs. biotic facilitation? Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 127–136.Google Scholar

Hardesty, B. D., Hubbell, S. P., and Bermingham, E. 2006. Genetic evidence of frequent long-distance recruitment in a vertebrate-dispersed tree. Ecology Letters 9: 516–525.Google Scholar

Harding, D. J., Lefsky, M. A., Parker, G. G., and Blair, J. B. 2001. Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests. Remote Sensing of Environment 76: 283–297.Google Scholar

Hoffman, T. S. and O’Riain, M. J. 2012. Landscape requirements of a primate population in a human-dominated environment. Frontiers in Zoology 9. DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-9-1.Google Scholar

Isbell, L. A. 1991. Contest and scramble competition: patterns of female aggression and ranging behavior among primates. Behavioral Ecology 2: 143–155.Google Scholar

Isbell, L. A., Pruetz, J. D., Young, T. P., and Lewis, M. 1998. Movements of vervets (Cercopithecus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) as estimators of food resource size, density, and distribution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42: 123–133.Google Scholar

Janson, C. 1985. Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18(2): 125–138.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H. 1992. Evolutionary ecology of primate social structure. Pages 95–130 in Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior. Smith, E. A. and Winterhalder, B. (Eds.). Aldine, New York.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H. and Goldsmith, M. L. 1995. Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks. Behavioral Ecology 6(3): 326–336.Google Scholar

Koenig, A. 2002. Competition for resources and its behavioral consequences among female primates. International Journal of Primatology 23: 759–783.Google Scholar

Koenig, A., Beise, J., Chalise, M. K., and Ganzhorn, J. U. 1998. When females should contest for food: testing hypotheses about resource density, distribution, size, and quality with Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42: 225–237.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. 1999. Ecological Methodology. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar

Lacher, T. E., Bouchardet da Fonseca, G. A., Alves, C., and Magalhaes-Castro, B. 1984. Parasitism of trees by marmosets in a central Brazilian gallery forest. Biotropica 16: 202–209.Google Scholar

Legendre, P. and Fortin, M. J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Plant Ecology 80: 107–138.Google Scholar

Leighton, M. and Leighton, D. R. 1982. The relationship of size and feeding aggregate size to size of food patch: howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) feeding in Trichilia cipo fruit trees on Barro Colorado Island. Biotropica 14: 81–90.Google Scholar

Levi, T., Silvius, K. M., Oliveira, L. F., Cummings, A. R., and Fragoso, J. M. 2013. Competition and facilitation in the capuchin–squirrel monkey relationship. Biotropica 45(5): 636–643.Google Scholar

Masota, A. M., Zahabu, E., Malimbwi, R. E., Bollandsas, O. E. and Eid, R. H. 2014. Volume models for single trees in tropical rainforests in Tanzania. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources 3: 66–76.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, N. 1989. Feeding strategies of Japanese monkeys against the deterioration of habitat quality. Primates 30(1): 1–16.Google Scholar

Norconk, M. A., Kinzey, W. G. 1994. Challenge of neotropical frugivory: travel patterns of spider monkeys and bearded sakis. Am J Primatol 34: 171–183.Google Scholar

Ord, J. K. and Getis, A. 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis 27: 287–306.Google Scholar

Peper, P. J., McPherson, E. G., and Mori, S. M. 2001. Equations for predicting diameter, height, crown width, and leaf area of San Joaquin Valley street trees. Journal of Arboriculture 27: 306–317.Google Scholar

Peres, C. A. 1991. Seed predation of Cariniana micrantha (Lecythidaceae) by brown capuchin monkeys in Central Amazonia. Biotropica 23(3): 262–270.Google Scholar

Peres, C. A. 1996. Use of space, spatial group structure, and foraging group size of gray woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha cana) at Urucu, Brazil. Pages 467–488 in Adaptive Radiations of Neotropical Primates. Norconk, M. A., Rosenberger, A. L., and Garber, P. A. (Eds.). Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Perry, J. N., Liebhold, A. M., Rosenberg, M. S., et al. 2002. Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. Ecography 25: 578–600.Google Scholar

Phillips, K. A. 1995. Resource patch size and flexible foraging in white-face capuchins (Cebus capucinus). International Journal of Primatology 16: 509–521.Google Scholar

Pickett, S. T. A. and White, P. S. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Pruetz, J. D. 1999. Socioecology of adult female vervet (Cercopithecus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) in Kenya: food availability, feeding competition, and dominance relationships. PhD Thesis. University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Pruetz, J. D. and Isbell, L. A. 2000. Correlations of food distribution and patch size with agonistic interactions in female vervets (Chlorocebus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) living in simple habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49(1): 38–47.Google Scholar

Ripley, B. D. 1976. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability 13: 255–266.Google Scholar

Russo, S. E. and Augspurger, C. K. 2004. Aggregated seed dispersal by spider monkeys limits recruitment to clumped patterns in Virola calophylla. Ecology Letters 7(11): 1058–1067.Google Scholar

Russo, S. E., Portnoy, S., and Augspurger, C. K. 2006. Incorporating animal behavior into seed dispersal models: implications for seed shadows. Ecology 87(12): 3160–3174.Google Scholar

Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systems 2: 369–403.Google Scholar

Sezen, U. U., Chazdon, R. L., and Holsinger, K. E. 2009. Proximity is not a proxy for parentage in an animal-dispersed Neotropical canopy palm. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2761664: 2037–2044.Google Scholar

Shaffer, C. A. 2012. Ranging behavior, group cohesiveness, and patch use in northern bearded sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus) in Guyana. PhD Thesis. Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar

Shaffer, C. A. 2013a. GIS analysis of patch use and group cohesiveness of bearded sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus) in the Upper Essequibo Conservation Concession, Guyana. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 150: 235–246.Google Scholar

Shaffer, C. A. 2013b. Ecological correlates of ranging behavior in bearded sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus) in a continuous forest in Guyana. International Journal of Primatology 34: 515–532.Google Scholar

Snaith, T. V. and Chapman, C. A. 2007. Primate group size and interpreting socioecological models: do folivores really play by different rules? Evolutionary Anthropology 16: 94–106.Google Scholar

Stephens, D. and Krebs, J. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Sterk, E. A., Watts, D. P. and van Schaik, C. P. 1997. The evolution of female social relationships in primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41: 291–310.Google Scholar

Stevenson, P. R., Quinones, M. J., and Ahumada, J. A. 1998. Effects of fruit patch availability on feeding subgroup size and spacing patterns in four primate species at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. International Journal of Primatology 19(2): 313–324.Google Scholar

Strier, K. B. 1989. Effects of patch size on feeding associations in muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). Folia primatologica 52: 70–77.Google Scholar

Symington, M. M. 1988. Food competition and foraging party size in the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus chamek). Behaviour 105: 117–134.Google Scholar

Temerin, L. A. and Cant, J. H. 1983. The evolutionary divergence of Old World monkeys and apes. American Naturalist 122: 335–351.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. L., Robl, N. J., Oliveira Melo, L. C., et al. 2013. Spatial distribution and exploitation of trees gouged by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). International Journal of Primatology 34: 65–85.Google Scholar

Tobler, W. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46(Supplement): 234–240.Google Scholar

Upton, G. and Fingleton, B. 1985. Spatial Data Analysis by Example: Volume 1: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C.P. 1989. The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. Pages 195–218 in Comparative Socioecology: The Behavioural Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals. Standen, V. and Foley, R.A. (Eds.). Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar

Vogel, E. R. and Janson, C. H. 2007. Predicting the frequency of food-related agonism in white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus), using a novel focal-tree method. American Journal of Primatology 69: 533–550.Google Scholar

Vogel, E. R. and Janson, C. H. 2011. Quantifying primate food distribution and abundance for socioecological studies: an objective consumer-centered method. International Journal of Primatology 32: 737–754.Google Scholar

Warren, W.G. 1972. Point processes in forestry. Pages 85–116 in Stochastic Point Processes, Statistical Analysis, Theory and Application. Lewis, P.A.W. (Ed.). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

White, F. J. and Wrangham, R. W. 1988. Feeding competition and patch size in the chimpanzee species Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes. Behaviour 105: 148–164.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R.W., Gittleman, J.L., and Chapman, C.A. 1993. Constraints on group size in primates and carnivores: population density and day-range as assays of exploitation competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32(3): 199–209.Google Scholar

Akers, A. A., Islam, M. A., and Nijman, V. 2013. Habitat characterization of western hoolock gibbons Hoolock hoolock by examining home range microhabitat use. Primates 54 : 341–348.Google Scholar

Bergman, C. M., Fryxell, J. M., Gates, C. C., and Fortin, D. 2001. Ungulate foraging strategies: energy maximizing or time minimizing? Journal of Animal Ecology 70 : 289–300.Google Scholar

Börger, L., Franconi, N., Ferretti, F., et al. 2006. An integrated approach to identify spatiotemporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. American Naturalist 168 : 471–485.Google Scholar

Boyle, S. A., Lourenco, W. C., da Silva, L. R., and Smith, A. T. 2009. Travel and spatial patterns change when Chiropotes satanas chiropotes inhabit forest fragments. International Journal of Primatology 30 : 515–531.Google Scholar

Burt, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 24 : 346–352.Google Scholar

Carbone, C., Cowlishaw, G., Isaac, N. J. B., and Rowcliffe, J. M. 2005. How far do animals go? Determinants of day range in mammals. American Naturalist 165 : 290–297.Google Scholar

Chapman, C. A. and Chapman, L. J. 2000. Determinants of group size in primates: the importance of travel costs. Pages 24–42 in On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. Boinski, S. and Garber, P. A. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Clissold, F. J., Sanson, G. D., Read, J., and Simpson, S. J. 2009. Gross vs. net income: how plant toughness affects performance of an insect herbivore. Ecology 90 : 3393–3405.Google Scholar

Fieberg, J. and Börger, L. 2012. Could you please phrase “home range” as a question? Journal of Mammalogy 93 : 890–902.Google Scholar

Foerster, S., Zhong, Y., Pintea, L., et al. 2017. Feeding habitat quality and behavioral trade-offs in chimpanzees: a case for species distribution models. Behavioral Ecology 27 : 1004–1016.Google Scholar

Fretwell, S. D. 1972. Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Ganzhorn, J. U. 1995. Low-level forest disturbance effects on primary production, leaf chemistry, and lemur populations. Ecology 76 : 2084–2096.Google Scholar

Hanya, G. and Bernard, H. 2016. Seasonally consistent small home range and long ranging distance in Presbytis rubicunda in Danum Valley, Borneo. International Journal of Primatology 37 : 390–404.Google Scholar

Harcourt, A. 1998. Ecological indicators of risk for primates, as judged by species’ susceptibility to logging. Pages 56–79 in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. Caro, T. (Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harper, G. J., Steininger, M. K., Tucker, C. J., Juhn, D., and Hawkins, F. 2007. Fifty years of deforestation and forest fragmentation in Madagascar. Environmental Conservation 34 : 325–333.Google Scholar

Harrison, M. E., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., and Chivers, D. J. 2010. Orangutan energetics and the influence of fruit availability in the nonmasting peat-swamp forest of Sabangau, Indonesian Borneo. International Journal of Primatology 31 : 585–607.Google Scholar

Hixon, M. A. 1982. Energy maximizers and time minimizers: theory and reality. American Naturalist 119 : 596–599.Google Scholar

Hooge, P. N. and Eichenlaub, B. 1997. Animal Movement Extension to ArcView. 2.0 ed. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Science Center – Biological Science Office, US Geological Survey.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T. 2006a. Ecological impacts of forest fragmentation on diademed sifakas (Propithecus diadema) at Tsinjoarivo, eastern Madagascar: implications for conservation in fragmented landscapes. PhD Thesis, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T. 2006b. Ecologically enigmatic lemurs: The sifakas of the eastern forests (Propithecus candidus, P. diadema, P. edwardsi, P. perrieri, and P. tattersalli). Pages 305–326 in Lemurs: Ecology and Adaptation. Gould, L. and Sauther, M. L. (Ed.). Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T. 2008a. Diademed sifaka (Propithecus diadema) ranging and habitat use in continuous and fragmented forest: higher density but lower viability in fragments? Biotropica 40 : 231–240.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T. 2008b. Feeding ecology of diademed sifakas (Propithecus diadema) in forest fragments and continuous forest. International Journal of Primatology 29 : 95–115.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T., Raharison, J.-L., and Wright, P. C. 2009. Spatial and temporal variability in predation on rainforest primates: do forest fragmentation and predation act synergistically? Animal Conservation 12 : 220–230.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T., Junge, R. E., Raharison, J. L., and Samonds, K. E. 2010. Variation in physiological health of diademed sifakas across intact and fragmented forest at Tsinjoarivo, eastern Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology 72 : 1013–1025.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T., Raharison, J.-L., Raubenheimer, D., Chapman, C. A., and Rothman, J. M. 2014. Nutritional correlates of the “lean season”: effects of seasonality and frugivory on the nutritional ecology of diademed sifakas. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 153 : 78–91.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T., Raharison, J.-L., Raubenheimer, D. R., Chapman, C. A., and Rothman, J. M. 2015. The nutritional geometry of resource scarcity: effects of lean seasons and habitat disturbance on nutrient intakes and balancing in wild sifakas. PLoS ONE 10: e0128046.Google Scholar

Irwin, M. T., Samonds, K. E., Raharison, J.-L., et al. 2019. Morphometric signals of population decline in diademed sifakas occupying degraded rainforest habitat in Madagascar. Scientific Reports 9 : 8776. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-45426-2.Google Scholar

Johns, A. D. and Skorupa, J. P. 1987. Responses of rain-forest primates to habitat disturbance: a review. International Journal of Primatology 8 : 157–191.Google Scholar

Kapos, V., Wandelli, E., Camargo, J. L. and Ganade, G. 1997. Edge-related changes in environment and plant responses due to forest fragmentation in central Amazonia. Pages 33–44 in Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. Laurance, W. F. and Bierregaard, R. O. Jr. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Kelt, D. A. and Van Vuren, D. H. 2001. The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. American Naturalist 157 : 637–645.Google Scholar

Laurance, W. F., Camargo, J. L. C., Luizao, R. C. C., et al. 2011. The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation 144 : 56–67.Google Scholar

Lowen, C. and Dunbar, R. I. M. 1994. Territory size and defendability in primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35 : 347–354.Google Scholar

Marsh, K. J., Wallis, I. R., Andrew, R. L., and Foley, W. J. 2006. The detoxification limitation hypothesis: where did it come from and where is it going? Journal of Chemical Ecology 32 : 1247–1266.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. J., Boyko, C. M., Feilen, K. L., Boyko, R. H., and Leighton, M. 2009. Defining fallback foods and assessing their importance in primate ecology and evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 140 : 603–614.Google Scholar

Marzluff, J. M., Millspaugh, J. J., Hurvitz, P., and Handcock, M. S. 2004. Relating resources to a probabilistic measure of space use: forest fragments and Steller’s Jays. Ecology 85 : 1411–1427.Google Scholar

Milich, K. M., Stumpf, R. M., Chambers, J. M., and Chapman, C. A. 2014. Female red colobus monkeys maintain their densities through flexible feeding strategies in logged forests in Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 154 : 52–60.Google Scholar

Mitani, J. C. and Rodman, P. S. 1979. Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5 : 241–251.Google Scholar

Ostfeld, R. S. 1994. The fence effect reconsidered. Oikos 70 : 340–348.Google Scholar

Palminteri, S. and Peres, C. A. 2012. Habitat selection and use of space by bald-faced sakis (Pithecia irrorata) in Southwestern Amazonia: lessons from a multiyear, multigroup study. International Journal of Primatology 33 : 401–417.Google Scholar

Palminteri, S., Powell, G. V. N., and Peres, C. A. 2016. Determinants of spatial behavior of a tropical forest seed predator: the roles of optimal foraging, dietary diversification, and home range defense. American Journal of Primatology 78 : 523–533.Google Scholar

Peres, C. A. 2000. Territorial defense and the ecology of group movements in small-bodied neotropical primates. Pages 100–123 in On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. Boinski, S. and Garber, P. A. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Potts, K. B., Baken, E., Levang, A., and Watts, D. P. 2016. Ecological factors influencing habitat use by chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology 78 : 432–440.Google Scholar

Powzyk, J. A. 1997. The socio-ecology of two sympatric indriids: Propithecus diadema diadema and Indri indri, a comparison of feeding strategies and their possible repercussions on species-specific behaviors. PhD Thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar

Ries, L., Fletcher, R. J. Jr., Battin, J., and Sisk, T. D. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35 : 491–522.Google Scholar

Rode, E. J., Stengel, C. J., and Nekaris, K. A.-I. 2013. Habitat assessment and species niche modeling. Pages 79–102 in Primate Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques. Sterling, E. J., Bynum, N., and Blair, M. E. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ross, C. and Reeve, N. 2011. Survey and census methods: population distribution and density. Pages 111–131 in Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide. Setchell, J. M. and Curtis, D. J. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Santhosh, K., Kumara, H. N., Velankar, A. D., and Sinha, A. 2015. Ranging behavior and resource use by lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) in selectively logged forests. International Journal of Primatology 36 : 288–310.Google Scholar

Schatz, G. E. 2001. Generic Tree Flora of Madagascar. Surrey: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar

Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2 : 369–404.Google Scholar

Shaffer, C. A. 2013a. Ecological correlates of ranging behavior in bearded sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus) in a continuous forest in Guyana. International Journal of Primatology 34 : 515–532.Google Scholar

Shaffer, C. A. 2013b. GIS analysis of patch use and group cohesiveness of bearded sakis (Chiropotes sagulatus) in the upper Essequibo Conservation Concession, Guyana. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 150 : 235–246.Google Scholar

Singh, M., Cheyne, S. M., and Ehlers Smith, D. A. 2018. How conspecific primates use their habitats: surviving in an anthropogenically-disturbed forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ecological Indicators 87 : 167–177.Google Scholar

Steudel, K. 2000. The physiology and energetics of movement: effects on individuals and groups. Pages 9–23 in On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. Boinski, S. and Garber, P. A. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Struhsaker, T. 1981. Census methods for estimating densities. Pages 36–80 in Techniques for the Study of Primate Population Ecology. National Research Council (Ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Teichroeb, J. A. and Sicotte, P. 2009. Test of the ecological-constraints model on ursine colobus monkeys (Colobus vellerosus) in Ghana. American Journal of Primatology 71 : 49–59.Google Scholar

Turk, D. 1995. A guide to trees of Ranomafana National Park and Central Eastern Madagascar. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Turton, S. M. and Freiburger, H. J. 1997. Edge and aspect effects on the microclimate of a small tropical forest remnant on the Atherton Tableland, Northeastern Australia. Pages 45–54 in Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. Laurance, W. F. and Bierregaard, R. O. Jr. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

van Horne, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47 : 893–901.Google Scholar

Worton, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70 : 164–168.Google Scholar

Wright, P. C., Johnson, S. E., Irwin, M. T., et al. 2008. The crisis of the critically endangered greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus). Primate Conservation 23 : 5–17.Google Scholar

Xiang, Z. F., Huo, S., and Xiao, W. 2011. Habitat selection of black-and-white snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) in Tibet: implications for species conservation. American Journal of Primatology 73 : 347–355.Google Scholar

Zeng, Y., Xu, J., Wang, Y., and Zhou, C. 2013. Habitat association and conservation implications of endangered Francois’ langur (Trachypithecus francoisi). PLoS ONE 8 : e75661.Google Scholar

Asensio, N., Brockelman, W. Y., Malaivijitnond, S., and Reichard, U. H. 2011. Gibbon travel paths are goal oriented. Animal Cognition 14(3): 395–405.Google Scholar

Bates, L. A., and Byrne, R. W. 2009. Sex differences in the movement patterns of free-ranging chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii): foraging and border checking. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64(2): 247–255.Google Scholar

Bruggeman, J. E., Garrott, R. A., White, P. J., Watson, F. G. R., and Wallen, R. 2007. Covariates affecting spatial variability in bison travel behavior in Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Applications 17(5): 1411–1423.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. W., Noser, R., Bates, L. A., and Jupp, P. E. 2009. How did they get here from there? Detecting changes of direction in terrestrial ranging. Animal Behaviour 77(3): 619–631.Google Scholar

Cruse, H., and Wehner, R. 2011. No need for a cognitive map: decentralized memory for insect navigation. PLoS Computational Biology 7(3): e1002009.Google Scholar

Department of Natural Resources WA. 2004. Standards and Guidelines for Land Surveying Using Global Positioning System Methods. State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WAGoogle Scholar

Di Fiore, A., and Suarez, S. A. 2007. Route-based travel and shared routes in sympatric spider and woolly monkeys: cognitive and evolutionary implications. Animal Cognition 10(3): 317–329.Google Scholar

Dolins, F. L. 2009. Captive cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus oedipus) use landmarks to localize hidden food items. American Journal of Primatology 71 : 316–323.Google Scholar

Dolins, F. L., Klimowicz, C., Kelley, J., and Menzel, C. R. 2014. Using virtual reality to investigate comparative spatial cognitive abilities in chimpanzees and humans. American Journal of Primatology 76 : 496–513.Google Scholar

Galdikas, B. M. F. 1988. Orangutan diet, range, and activity at Tanjung Puting, Central Borneo. International Journal of Primatology 9(1): 1–35.Google Scholar

Galdikas, B. M. F. and Vasey, P. 1992. Why are orangutans so smart? Ecological and social hypotheses. Pages 183–224 in Social Processes and Mental Abilities in Non-Human Primates. Burton, F. D. (Ed.). The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, NY.Google Scholar

Gallistel, C. R. and Cramer, A. E. 1996. Computations on metric maps in mammals: getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route. Journal of Experimental Biology 199(1): 211–217.Google Scholar

Hopkins, M. E. 2010. Mantled howler (Alouatta palliata) arboreal pathway networks: relative impacts of resource availability and forest structure. International Journal of Primatology 32(1): 238–258.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Byrne, R. W., and Zuberbühler, K. 2006. Evidence for a spatial memory of fruiting states of rainforest trees in wild mangabeys. Animal Behaviour 72(4): 797–807.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H. and Byrne, R. 2007. What wild primates know about resources: opening up the black box. Animal Cognition 10(3): 357–367.Google Scholar

Knott, C., Beaudrot, L., Snaith, T., et al. 2008. Female–female competition in Bornean orangutans. International Journal of Primatology 29(4): 975–997.Google Scholar

Leighton, M. 1993. Modeling dietary selectivity by Bornean orangutans: evidence for integration of multiple criteria in fruit selection. International Journal of Primatology 14(2): 257–313.Google Scholar

Lührs, M.-L., Dammhahn, M., Kappeler, P. M., and Fichtel, C. 2009. Spatial memory in the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). Animal Cognition 12(4): 599–609.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, J. 1974. The behaviour and ecology of wild orangutans. Animal Behaviour 22: 3–74.Google Scholar

Milton, K. 1981. Distribution patterns of tropical plant foods as an evolutionary stimulus to primate mental development. American Anthropologist 83: 534–548.Google Scholar

Ministry of Environment BC. 2001. British Columbia Standards, Specifications and Guidelines for Resource Surveys Using Global Positioning System (GPS) Technology. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Victoria, BC.Google Scholar

Morrogh-Bernard, H., Husson, S. J., Knott, C. D., et al. 2009. Orangutan activity budgets and diet. Pages 119–134 in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioural Ecology and Conservation. Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., and van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Normand, E. and Boesch, C. 2009. Sophisticated Euclidean maps in forest chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 77(5): 1195–1201.Google Scholar

Noser, R. and Byrne, R. W. 2010. How do wild baboons (Papio ursinus) plan their routes? Travel among multiple high-quality food sources with inter-group competition. Animal Cognition 13(1): 145–155.Google Scholar

Porter, L. M. and Garber, P. A. 2012. Foraging and spatial memory in wild Weddell’s saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis weddelli) when moving between distant and out-of-sight goals. International Journal of Primatology 34(1): 30–48.Google Scholar

Poucet, B. 1993. Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review 100(2): 163–182.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. L. and Evans, S. 2001. Episodic memory in primates. American Journal of Primatology 55(2): 71–85.Google Scholar

Setiawan, A., Nugroho, T. S., and Pudyatmoko, S. 2009. A survey of Miller’s grizzled surili, Presbytis hosei canicrus, in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Primate Conservation 24(1): 139–143.Google Scholar

Singleton, I., Knott, C. D., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., Wich, S. A., and van Schaik, C. P. 2009. Ranging behavior of orangutan females and social organization. Pages 205–214 in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioural Ecology and Conservation. Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., and van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Squires, J. R., DeCesare, N. J., Olson, L. E., et al. 2013. Combining resource selection and movement behavior to predict corridors for Canada lynx at their southern range periphery. Biological Conservation 157: 187–195.Google Scholar

Thorpe, S. K. and Crompton, R. H. 2009. Orangutan positional behaviour. Pages 33–47 in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioural Ecology and Conservation. Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., and van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Adamescu, G. S., Plumptre, A. J., Abernethy, K. A., et al. 2018. Annual cycles are the most common reproductive strategy in African tropical tree communities. Biotropica 50(3): 418–430.Google Scholar

Alverson, W., Moskovitz, D. K., Shopland, J. M. (Eds.). 2000. Rapid Biological Inventories for Conservation Action: Northwestern Pando, Bolivia. Field Museum, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ban, S. D., Boesch, C., and Janmaat, K. R. L. 2014. Taï chimpanzees anticipate revisiting high-valued fruit trees from further distances. Animal Cognition 17: 1353–1364.Google Scholar

Ban, S. D., Boesch, C., N’Guessan, A., et al. 2016. Taï chimpanzees change their travel direction for rare feeding trees providing fatty fruits. Animal Behaviour 118: 135–147.Google Scholar

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H. J. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68 : 255–278.Google Scholar

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48.Google Scholar

Bertolani, M. P. 2013. Ranging and travelling patterns of wild chimpanzees at Kibale, Uganda: a GIS approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Boesch, C. and Boesch, A. 2000. The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: Behavioral Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Di Fiore, A. and Suarez, S. A. 2007. Route-based travel and shared routes in sympatric spider and woolly monkeys: cognitive and evolutionary implications. Animal Cognition 10: 317–329.Google Scholar

Digby, L. J., Ferrari, S. F., and Saltzman, W. 2011. The role of competition in cooperatively breeding species. Pages 91–107 in Primates in Perspective, 2nd edition. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Bearder, S., and Stumpf, R. M. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Dobson, A. J. and Barnett, A. 2008. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A. 1988. Foraging decisions during nectar feeding by tamarin monkeys (Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis, Callitrichidae, Primates) in Amazonian Peru. Biotropica 20: 100–106.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A. 1989. Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis. American Journal of Primatology 19: 203–216.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A. 2000. The ecology of group movement: evidence for the use of spatial, temporal, and social information in some primate foragers. Pages 261–298 in On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. Boinski, S. and Garber, P.A. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A. in press. Primate cognitive ecology: challenges and solutions to locating and acquiring resources in social foragers. In Primate Diet and Nutrition: Needing, Finding, and Using Food. Lambert, J. E. and Rothman, J. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A., and Porter, L. M. 2010. The ecology of exudate feeding and exudate production in Saguinus and Callimico. Pages 89–108 in The Evolution of Exudativory in Primates. Burrows, A. and Nash, L. (Eds). Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A., and Porter, L. M. 2014. Navigating in small-scale space: the role of landmarks and resource monitoring in understanding saddleback tamarin travel. American Journal of Primatology 76: 447–459.Google Scholar

Garber, P.A., Porter, L.M., Spross, J., and Di Fiore, A. 2016. Tamarins: insights into monogamous and non-monogamous single female breeding systems. American Journal of Primatology 78: 298–314.Google Scholar

Goné Bi, Z. B. 2007. Régime alimentaire des chimpanzés, distribution spatiale et phénologie des plantes dont les fruits sont consommés par les chimpanzés du Parc National de Taï, en Côte d’Ivoire. PhD Thesis, University of Cocody.Google Scholar

Hothorn, T. and Hornik, K. 2013. exactRankTests: exact distributions for rank and permutation tests. R package version 0.8-24. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=exactRankTests.Google Scholar

Jang, H., Boesch, C., Mundry, R., Ban, S. D., and Janmaat, K. R. L. 2019. Travel linearity and speed of human foragers and chimpanzees during their daily search for food in tropical rainforests. Scientfic Reports 9: 11066.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L. and Chancellor, R. L. 2010. Exploring new areas: how important is long-term spatial memory for mangabey (Lophocebus albigena johnstonii) foraging efficiency? International Journal of Primatology 31: 863–886.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Olupot, W., Chancellor, R. L., Arlet, M. E., and Waser, P. M. 2009. Long-term site fidelity and individual home range shifts in Lophocebus albigena. International Journal of Primatology 30: 443–466.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Ban, S. D., and Boesch, C. 2013a. Chimpanzees use long-term spatial memory to monitor large fruit trees and remember feeding experiences across seasons. Animal Behaviour 86: 1183–1205.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Ban, S. D. and Boesch, C. 2013b. Taï chimpanzees use botanical skills to discover fruit: what we can learn from their mistakes. Animal Cognition 16: 851–860.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Polansky, L., Ban, S. D., and Boesch, C. 2014. Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 16343–16348.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Boesch, C., Byrne, R., et al. 2016. The spatio-temporal complexity of chimpanzee food: how cognitive adaptations can counteract the ephemeral nature of ripe fruit. American Journal of Primatology 78: 626–645.Google Scholar

Kalan, A. K. and Boesch, C. 2015. Audience effects in chimpanzee food calls and their potential for recruiting others. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69: 1701–1712.Google Scholar

Koenig, W. D., Kelly, D., Sork, V. L., et al. 2003. Dissecting components of population-level variation in seed production and the evolution of masting behavior. Oikos 102: 581–591.Google Scholar

Kouakou, C. Y., Boesch, C., and Kuehl, H. 2011. Identifying hotspots of chimpanzee group activity from transect surveys in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27: 621–630.Google Scholar

Laden, G. T. 1992. Ethnoarchaeology and land use ecology of the Efe (pygmies) of the Ituri rain forest, Zaire: a behavioral ecological study of land use patterns and foraging behavior. PhD Thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Lledo-Ferrer, Y., Pelaez, F., and Heymann, E. W. 2011. The equivocal relationship between territoriality and scent marking in wild saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). International Journal of Primatology 32: 974–991.Google Scholar

Lopez-Rebellon, N. 2010. Sex and age-based differences in antipredator behavior in saddle-back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis) in the department of Pando, Bolivia. MA Thesis, DeKalb, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar

Martin, P. and Bateson, P. 1993. Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Milton, K. 1980. The Foraging Strategy of Howler Monkeys: A Study in Primate Economics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Nishida, T., Zamma, K., Matsusaka, T., Inaba, A., and McGrew, W. C. 2010. Chimpanzee Behavior in the Wild: An Audio-Visual Encyclopedia. Springer, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Normand, E., Ban, S. D., and Boesch, C. 2009. Forest chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) remember the location of numerous fruit trees. Animal Cognition 12(6): 797–807.Google Scholar

Noser, R. and Byrne, R. W. 2015. Wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) remember single foraging episodes. Animal Cognition 18, 921–929.Google Scholar

Peñuelas, J., Filella, I., Xiaoyang, Z., et al. 2004. Complex spatiotemporal phenological shifts as a response to rainfall changes. New Phytologist 161: 837–846.Google Scholar

Polansky, L. and Boesch, C. 2013. Long-term fruit phenology and rainfall trends conflict in a West African lowland tropical rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 45: 409–535.Google Scholar

Porter, L. M. 2001. Dietary differences among sympatric Callitrichinae in northern Bolivia: Callimico goeldii, Saguinus fuscicollis and S. labiatus. International Journal of Primatology 22: 961–992.Google Scholar

Porter, L. M. and Garber, P. A. 2013. Foraging and spatial memory in wild Weddell’s saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis weddelli) when moving between distant and out-of-sight goals. International Journal of Primatology 34: 30–48.Google Scholar

Porter, L. M., Sterr, S. M., and Garber, P. A. 2007. Habitat use and ranging behavior of Callimico goeldii. International Journal of Primatology 28: 1035–1058.Google Scholar

Porter, L. M., Erb, W. M., Saire, C. L., et al. 2015. Temporal changes in the composition of saddleback tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis weddelli) groups over time. American Association of Physical Anthropologists 156(60): 255–256.Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H., Clüver, A., Saucke, L., et al. 2014. Apes are intuitive statisticians. Cognition 131(1): 60–68.Google Scholar

Rylands, A., Heymann, E., Matauschek, C., et al. 2016. Taxonomic review of the New World tamarins (Primates: Callitrichidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177 (4): 1003–1028.Google Scholar

Schel, A. M., Machanda, Z., Townsend, S. W., Zuberbühler, K., and Slocombe, K. E. 2013. Chimpanzee food calls are directed at specific individuals. Animal Behaviour 86: 955–965.Google Scholar

Stumpf, R. M. 2011. Chimpanzees and bonobos: inter- and intraspecies diversity. Pages 340–356 in Primates in Perspective, 2nd edition. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Bearder, S., and Stumpf, R. M. (Eds.) Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Tecwyn, E. C., Denison, S., Messer, E. J., and Buchsbaum, D. 2017. Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition 20(2): 243–256.Google Scholar

Terborgh, J. 1983. Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Al-Safadi, M. M. 1994. The hamadryas baboon, Papio hamadryas (Linnaeus, 1758) in Yemen (Mammalia: Primates: Cercopithecidae). Zoology in the Middle East 10: 5–16.Google Scholar

Altmann, S. A. and Altmann, J. 1970. Baboon Ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. P. D., Rhodes, C. J., Macdonald, D. W., and Anderson, R. M. 2002. Scale-free dynamics in the movement patterns of jackals. Oikos 98: 134–140.Google Scholar

Austin, D., Bowen, W. D., and McMillan, J. I. 2004. Intraspecific variation in movement patterns: modeling individual behaviour in a large marine predator. Oikos 105: 15–30.Google Scholar

Bailey, H. and Thompson, P. 2006. Quantitative analysis of bottlenose dolphin movement patterns and their relationship with foraging. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 456–465.Google Scholar

Bartumeus, F. 2007. Levy processes in animal movement: an evolutionary hypothesis. Fractals: Complex Geometry Patterns and Scaling in Nature and Society 15: 151–162.Google Scholar

Bartumeus, F., Peters, F., Pueyo, S., Marrase, C., and Catalan, J. 2003. Helical Levy walks: adjusting searching statistics to resource availability in microzooplankton. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 12771–12775.Google Scholar

Benedix, J. H. 1993. Area-restricted search by the plains pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius) in tallgrass prairie habitat. Behavioral Ecology 4: 318–324.Google Scholar

Benhamou, S. 1992. Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behavior in a continuous patchy environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology 159: 67–81.Google Scholar

Benhamou, S. 2007. How many animals really do the Lévy walk? Ecology 88: 1962–1969.Google Scholar

Berg, H. C. 1983. Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Bergman, C. M., Schaefer, J. A., and Luttich, S. N. 2000. Caribou movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 123: 364–374.Google Scholar

Biquand, S., Biquand-Guyot, V., Boug, A., and Gautier, J.-P. 1992. Group composition in wild and commensal hamadryas baboons: a comparative study in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Primatology 13: 533–543.Google Scholar

Blackwell, P. G. 1997. Random diffusion models for animal movement. Ecological Modelling 100: 87–102.Google Scholar

Bond, A. B. 1980. Optimal foraging in a uniform habitat: search mechanism of the green lacewing. Animal Behaviour 28: 10–19.Google Scholar

Bovet, P. and Benhamou, S. 1988. Spatial analysis of animals’ movements using a correlated random walk model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 131: 419–433.Google Scholar