Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:21:57.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Wisdom in the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Judith Glück
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Judith Glück
Affiliation:
Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychology of Wisdom
An Introduction
 , pp. 209 - 261
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aristotle (1999). Nicomachean Ethics, M. Ostwald, trans. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: “educational triage” and the Texas Accountability System. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booher-Jennings, J. (2007). Rationing education in an era of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 756–61.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997), The Right to Learn: A Blueprint for Creating Schools That Work. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Delattre, E. J., (1996), Character and Cops: Ethics in Policing. The AEI Press.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, J. (2019). Biased. Penguin.Google Scholar
Forer, L. G. (1992). Justice by numbers. Washington Monthly, 24(4), 12–18.Google Scholar
Groopman, J. (2002), Dying words. How should doctors deliver bad news? The New Yorker, October 28, pp. 62–70.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Don’t Shoot: One Man, A Street Fellowship, and the End of Violence in Inner-City America. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Koretz, D. (2017). The Testing Charade. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kronman, A. T. (1993). The Lost Lawyer. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mather, L., McEwen, C. A., and Maiman, R. J. (2001). Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, M. (2004). The Mind at Work: Valuing the Intelligence of the American Worker. Viking.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. and Sharpe, K. (2010). Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to do the Right Thing. Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. and Wrzesniewski, A. (2019). Reconceptualizing intrinsic motivation. In K. Renninger, A. and Hidi, S. E., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning. Cambridge University Press, pp. 373–93.Google Scholar
Sparrow, M. K., Moore, M. H., and Kennedy, D. M., (1990). Beyond 911: A New Era for Policing. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (1999). Teachers in Chicago schools follow script from day 001. New York Times, November 26; www.nytimes.com/1999/11/26/us/teachers-in-chicago-schools-follow-script-from-day-001.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, W. M. (1995). Work and Integrity: The Crisis and Promise of Professionalism in America. Harper Collins.Google Scholar

References

Alvesson, M. and Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383–95.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1984). Nicomachean Ethics, Apostle, H. G., trans. The Peripatetic Press.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Wernsing, T., and Gardner, W. L. (2018). Revisiting the development and validation of the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire: analytical clarifications. Journal of Management, 44(2), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbuto, J. E. Jr. and Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group and Organization Management, 31(3), 300–26.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. and Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership, 2nd ed. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J., Westbrook, D., Fennell, M. et al. (2004). Behavioural experiments: historical and conceptual underpinnings. In Bennett-Levy, J., Butler, G., Fennell, M. et al., eds., Oxford Guide to Behavioural Experiments in Cognitive Therapy. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Osterloh, M., Rost, K., and Ehrmann, T. (2020). How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., and Jehn, K. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1227–74.Google Scholar
Boddy, C. R. (2015). Psychopathic leadership: a case study of a corporate psychopath CEO. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 141–56.Google Scholar
Boddy, C. R. (2017). A Climate of Fear: Stone Cold Psychopaths at Work. Clive R. Boddy.Google Scholar
Boddy, C. R., Mile, S. D., Sanyal, C., and Hartog, M. (2015). Extreme managers, extreme workplaces: capitalism, organizations and corporate psychopaths. Organization, 22(4), 530–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–10.Google Scholar
Case, P., French, R., and Simpson, P. (2012). From theoria to theory: leadership without contemplation. Organization, 19(3), 345–61.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. and Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It’s all about me: narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–87.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Curnow, T. (2011). Sophia and phronesis: past, present, and future. Research in Human Development, 8(2), 95–108.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., and Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 307–38.Google Scholar
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarsen, S., Schanke-Aasland, M., and Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: a definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207–16.Google Scholar
Fahy, P. (2017). How to avoid hiring a narcissist: a toxic hire will hurt your team and your leadership credibility. The Journal of Medical Practice Management, 33(3), 146–9.Google Scholar
Glück, J. and Bluck, S. (2011). Laypeople’s conceptions of wisdom and its development: cognitive and integrative views. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(3), 321–4.Google Scholar
Glück, J. and Bluck, S. (2013). The MORE Life Experience Model: a theory of the development of personal wisdom. In Ferrari, M. and Weststrate, N. M., eds., The Scientific Study of Personal Wisdom: From Contemplative Traditions to Neuroscience. Springer, pp. 75–98.Google Scholar
Glück, J., Bluck, S., and Weststrate, N. M. (2018). More on the MORE Life Experience Model: what we have learned (so far). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 349–70.Google ScholarPubMed
González, E. (2002). Defining a post-conventional corporate moral responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1), 101-108.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership. Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Guignon, C. B. (2004). On Being Authentic. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, M. and Lord, R. G. (2007). A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 370–90.Google Scholar
Jeste, D. V. and Vahia, I. V. (2008). Comparison of the conceptualization of wisdom in ancient Indian literature with modern views: focus on the Bhagavad Gita. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 71(3), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeste, D. V., Thomas, M. L., Liu, J. et al. (2021). Is spirituality a component of wisdom? Study of 1,786 adults using expanded San Diego Wisdom Scale (Jeste-Thomas Wisdom Index). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 132, 174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. (2017). Developing leaders to perform in uncertainty: the mindfulness solution. Ph.D thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
King, E., Norbury, K., and Rooney, D. (in press). Coaching for leadership wisdom. Organizational Dynamics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100815Google Scholar
Landay, K., Harms, P. D., and Credé, M. (2019). Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: the consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 137–73.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J., Blank, A., and Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: the role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 635–42.Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., and Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–77.Google Scholar
McKenna, B., Rooney, D., and Boal, K. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 177–90.Google Scholar
Manz, C. C. and Sims, H. P., Jr. (1991). Superleadership: beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 18–35.Google Scholar
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., and Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–88.Google Scholar
Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., and Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Measuring the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 182–96.Google Scholar
Oc, B., Daniels, M. A., Diefendorff, J. M., Bashshur, M. R., and Greguras, G. J. (2020a). Humility breeds authenticity: how authentic leader humility shapes follower vulnerability and felt authenticity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 158, 112–25.Google Scholar
Oc, B., Netchaeva, E., and Kouchaki, M. (2020b). It’s a man’s world! The role of political ideology in the early stages of leader recruitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 24–41.Google Scholar
Ouimet, G. (2010). Dynamics of narcissistic leadership in organizations: towards an integrated research model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(7), 713–26.Google Scholar
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., and Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parris, D. L. and Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377–93.Google Scholar
Pelletier, K. L. (2010). Leader toxicity: an empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadership, 6(4), 373–89.Google Scholar
Piętka, D. (2015). The concept of intuition and its role in Plato and Aristotle. Organon, 47, 23–40.Google Scholar
Pretz, J. E., Brookings, J. B., Carlson, L. A. et al. (2014). Development and validation of a new measure of intuition: the types of intuition scale. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(5), 454–67.Google Scholar
Purser, R. E. and Loy, D. (2013). Beyond McMindfulness. Huffington Post, 1(7), 13.Google Scholar
Reed, L. L., Vidaver-Cohen, D., and Colwell, S. R. (2011). A new scale to measure executive servant leadership: development, analysis, and implications for research. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 415–34.Google Scholar
Rooney, D., McKenna, B., and Liesch, P. (2010). Wisdom and Management in the Knowledge Economy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rooney, D., Küpers, W., Pauleen, D., and Zhuravleva, E. (2021). A developmental model for educating wise leaders: the role of mindfulness and habitus in creating time for embodying wisdom. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. A. and Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617–33.Google Scholar
Rosette, A. S., Leonardelli, G. J., and Phillips, K. W. (2008). The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 758–77.Google Scholar
Ryömä, A. (2020). The interplay of heroic and post-heroic leadership: exploring tensions in leadership manifestations in the oscillations between onstage and offstage contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(1), 101092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, R., Silver, J., and Silver, J. (2012). Almost A Psychopath: Do I (Or Does Someone I Know) Have a Problem with Manipulation and Lack of Empathy? Hazelden.Google Scholar
Schyns, B. and Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–58.Google Scholar
Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., and Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402–24.Google Scholar
Sheehy, B., Boddy, C. R., and Murphy, B. (2020). Corporate law and corporate psychopaths. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, September 10; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2020.1795000Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). What is wisdom and how can we develop it? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 164–74.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity in leadership: how does one know which is which? In Mumford, M. and Higgs, C. A., eds., Leader Thinking Skills: Capacities for Contemporary Leadership. Routledge, pp. 362–81.Google Scholar
Thoroughgood, C. N., Padilla, A., Hunter, S. T., and Tate, B. W. (2012). The susceptible circle: a taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 897–917.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, R. H. and Ferrari, M. (2011). Sophia and phronesis in psychology, philosophy, and traditional wisdom. Research in Human Development, 8(2), 89–94.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–31.Google Scholar
Valentine, S., Fleischman, G., and Godkin, L. (2018). Villains, victims, and verisimilitudes: an exploratory study of unethical corporate values, bullying experiences, psychopathy, and selling professionals’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 135–54.Google Scholar
Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–61.Google Scholar
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., and Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–83.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. and Deng, X. C. (2015). Paths from trauma to intrapersonal strength: worldview, posttraumatic growth and wisdom. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 20(3), 253–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westover, T. (2018). Educated. Windmill Books.Google Scholar

References

Ambrose, D. (1996). Panoramic scanning: essential element of higher-order thought. Roeper Review, 18(4), 280–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2009). Expanding Visions of Creative Intelligence: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2011). Dysmorphic capitalism and the aberrant development of creative intelligence. In Shelton, E. N., ed., Capitalism in Business, Politics and Society. Nova Science Publishers, pp. 119–30.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2012a). Dogmatic neoclassical economics and neoliberal ideology suppressing talent development in mathematics: implications for teacher education. In Jacobsen, L. J., Mistele, J., and Sriraman, B., eds., Mathematics Teacher Education in the Public Interest: Equity and Social Justice. Information Age, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2012b). The not-so-invisible hand of economics and its impact on conceptions and manifestations of high ability. In Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R. J., and Sriraman, B. eds., Confronting Dogmatism in Gifted Education. Routledge, pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2017). Interdisciplinary invigoration of creativity studies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 348–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. (2019). The erosion of democracy: can we muster enough wisdom to stop it? In Sternberg, R. J., Glueck, J., and Nussbaum, H., eds., Applying Wisdom to Contemporary World Problems. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–50.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. and Ambrose, V. K. (2013). Adult lost prizes, missing aspirations, a 21st-century education, and self-fulfillment. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1(1), 75–86.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. and Cross, T. L., eds. (2009). Morality, Ethics, and Gifted Minds. Springer Science.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. and Sternberg, R. J., eds. (2012). How Dogmatic Beliefs Harm Creativity and Higher-Level Thinking. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. and Sternberg, R. J., eds. (2016a). Creative Intelligence in the 21st Century: Grappling with Enormous Problems and Huge Opportunities. Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, D. and Sternberg, R. J., eds. (2016b). Giftedness and Talent in the 21st Century: Adapting to the Turbulence of Globalization. Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R. J., and Sriraman, B., eds. (2012). Confronting Dogmatism in Gifted Education. Routledge.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: the case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. and Glass, G. V. (2014). 50 Myths and Lies That Threaten America’s Public Schools: The Real Crisis in Education. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bermeo, N. (2003). Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bjornerud, M. (2020). Timefulness: How Thinking Like a Geologist Can Help Save the World. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Borel, B. (2018). Clicks, lies and videotape. Scientific American, 319(4), 38–43.Google Scholar
Byers, W. (2014). Deep Thinking: What Mathematics Can Teach Us About the Mind. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (2018). The Infinite Desire for Growth, M. Todd, trans. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Costigan, A. T. and Grey, L., eds. (2015). Demythologizing Educational Reforms: Responses to the Political and Corporate Takeover of Education. Routledge.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2015). GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Croley, S. P. (2007). Regulation and Public Interests: The Possibility of Good Regulatory Government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E. and Farley, J. (2010). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. Island Press.Google Scholar
Dayen, D. (2020). Monopolized: Life in the Age of Corporate Power. The New Press.Google Scholar
DeBoom, M. J. (2021). Climate necropolitics: ecological civilization and the distributive geographies of extractive violence in the Anthropocene. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(3), 900–12.Google Scholar
Dintersmith, T. (2018). What School Could Be: Insights and Inspiration from Teachers Across America. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. K. and Lessler, J. (2020). What now? Epidemiology in the wake of a pandemic. American Journal of Epidemiology, 190(1), 17–20.Google Scholar
Ember, C. R., Ringen, E. J., Dunnington, J., and Pitek, E. (2020). Resource stress and subsistence diversification across societies. Nature Sustainability, 3(9), 737–45.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. D. (2011). Nuclear Energy: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171–91.Google Scholar
Fording, R. C. and Schram, S. F. (2017). The cognitive and emotional sources of Trump support: the case of low-information voters. New Political Science, 39(4), 670–686.Google Scholar
Freedman, C. F. (2008). Chicago Fundamentalism: Ideology and Methodology in Economics. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, J. (2013). The Future Is Not What It Used to Be: Climate Change and Energy Scarcity. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2018). Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. (2009). Self-Fulfillment. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin, I. and Mariathasan, M. (2014). The Butterfly Defect: How Globalization Creates Systemic Risks, and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. and Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – And Turned Its Back on The Middle Class. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hasen, R. L. (2015). Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651/1985). Leviathan. Penguin.Google Scholar
Jordan, S. B., Fenn, S. L., and Shannon, B. B. (2020). Transparency as threat at the intersection of artificial intelligence and cyberbiosecurity. Computer, 53(10), 59–68.Google Scholar
Kirchick, J. (2018). The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues, and the Coming Dark Age. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Klare, M. T. (2012). The Race for What’s Left: The Global Scramble for the World’s Last Resources. Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Koretz, D. (2017). The Testing Charade: Pretending to Make Schools Better. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. L. and Maslin, M. A. (2018). The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lopez-Claros, A., Dahl, A. L., and Groff, M. (2020). Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2020). COVID-19: The Pandemic That Never Should Have Happened and How to Stop the Next One. Hachette.Google Scholar
Madrick, J. (2014). Seven Bad Ideas: How Mainstream Economists Have Damaged America and the World. Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1966). The Psychology of Science: A Reconnaissance. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mattli, W. (2019). Darkness by Design: The Hidden Power in Global Capital Markets. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, N; (2013) From knowledge to wisdom: assessment and prospects after three decades. Integral Review, 9(2) 76–112.Google Scholar
Meissner, G. (2020). Artificial intelligence: consciousness and conscience. AI & SOCIETY, 35(1), 225–35.Google Scholar
Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ord, T. (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Hachette.Google Scholar
Payne, K. (2017). The Broken Ladder: How Inequality Affects the Way we Think, Live, and Die. Viking.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, T., Giurco, D., Mudd, G., Mason, L., and Behrisch, J. (2012). Global transformations, social metabolism and the dynamics of socio-environmental conflicts. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 577–87.Google Scholar
Purdy, J. (2018). After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (2010). Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools. Knopf Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Rees, M. (2018). On the Future: Prospects for Humanity. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Falkenmark, M., Allan, T. et al. (2014). The unfolding water drama in the Anthropocene: towards a resilience‐based perspective on water for global sustainability. Ecohydrology, 7(5), 1249–61.Google Scholar
Roper, J., Ganesh, S., and Zorn, T. E. (2016). Doubt, delay, and discourse: skeptics’ strategies to politicize climate change. Science Communication, 38(6), 776–99.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. (2020). The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, R. M. (2018). The health-wealth gap. Scientific American, 319(5), 63–7.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Spinney, L. (2020). The shared past that wasn’t: how Facebook, fake news and friends are altering memories and changing history. Scientific American, 29(4), 50–55.Google Scholar
Spreeuwenberg, P., Kroneman, M., and Paget, J. (2018). Reassessing the global mortality burden of the 1918 influenza pandemic. American Journal of Epidemiology. 187(12), 2561–7.Google Scholar
Starkman, D. (2015). The Watchdog That Didn’t Bark: The Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Journalism. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: a model of giftedness in leadership. Roeper Review, 28(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). The WICS approach to leadership: stories of leadership and the structures and processes that support them. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 360–71.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: a new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 152–69.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Speculations on the role of successful intelligence in solving contemporary world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 6(1), 4.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Transformational giftedness: rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–40.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Adaptive Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Nusbaum, H. C. and Glück, J. (2019). Applying Wisdom to Contemporary World Problems. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Temin, P. (2017). The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., and Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2006). Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction, 4th ed. Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
Truong, T. C., Diep, Q. B., and Zelinka, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the cyber domain: offense and defense. Symmetry, 12(3), 410.Google Scholar
Wexler‐Sherman, C., Gardner, H., and Feldman, D. H. (1988) A pluralistic view of early assessment: the project spectrum approach. Theory Into Practice, 27(1), 77–83.Google Scholar
Wiegandt, K., ed. (2018). A Sustainable Future: 12 Key Areas of Global Concern. Haus Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. and Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. and Pickett, K. E. (2019). The Inner Level: How More Equal Societies Reduce Stress, Restore Sanity and Improve Everyone's Well-Being. Penguin.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2014). Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Dragon? Why China has the Best (and Worst) Education System in the World. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×