Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-17T06:13:28.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The CODATwins Project: The Cohort Description of Collaborative Project of Development of Anthropometrical Measures in Twins to Study Macro-Environmental Variation in Genetic and Environmental Effects on Anthropometric Traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2015

Karri Silventoinen*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Aline Jelenkovic
Affiliation:
Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
Reijo Sund
Affiliation:
Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Chika Honda
Affiliation:
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Sari Aaltonen
Affiliation:
Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Yoshie Yokoyama
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Nursing, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
Adam D. Tarnoki
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
David L. Tarnoki
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Feng Ning
Affiliation:
Department of Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention, Qingdao Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, China
Fuling Ji
Affiliation:
Department of Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention, Qingdao Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, China
Zengchang Pang
Affiliation:
Department of Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention, Qingdao Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, China
Juan R. Ordoñana
Affiliation:
Department of Human Anatomy and Psychobiology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
Juan F. Sánchez-Romera
Affiliation:
IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Lucia Colodro-Conde
Affiliation:
Department of Human Anatomy and Psychobiology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
S. Alexandra Burt
Affiliation:
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Kelly L. Klump
Affiliation:
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Sarah E. Medland
Affiliation:
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Grant W. Montgomery
Affiliation:
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Christian Kandler
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
Tom A. McAdams
Affiliation:
MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
Thalia C. Eley
Affiliation:
MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
Alice M. Gregory
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK
Kimberly J. Saudino
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Lise Dubois
Affiliation:
School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Michel Boivin
Affiliation:
École de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
Claire M. A. Haworth
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick Coventry, Coventry, UK
Robert Plomin
Affiliation:
MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
Sevgi Y. Öncel
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey
Fazil Aliev
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Actuaria and Risk Management, Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey
Maria A. Stazi
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità –– National Center for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Rome, Italy
Corrado Fagnani
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità –– National Center for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Rome, Italy
Cristina D’Ippolito
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità –– National Center for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Rome, Italy
Jeffrey M. Craig
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Richard Saffery
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sisira H. Siribaddana
Affiliation:
Institute of Research & Development, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka Faculty of Medicine & Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka
Matthew Hotopf
Affiliation:
NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
Athula Sumathipala
Affiliation:
Institute of Research & Development, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, School for Primary Care Research (SPCR), Faculty of Health, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
Timothy Spector
Affiliation:
Department of Twin Research and Genetic epidemiology, King's College, London, UK
Massimo Mangino
Affiliation:
Department of Twin Research and Genetic epidemiology, King's College, London, UK
Genevieve Lachance
Affiliation:
Department of Twin Research and Genetic epidemiology, King's College, London, UK
Margaret Gatz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
David A. Butler
Affiliation:
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
Gombojav Bayasgalan
Affiliation:
Healthy Twin Association of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Danshiitsoodol Narandalai
Affiliation:
Healthy Twin Association of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
Duarte L. Freitas
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal
José Antonio Maia
Affiliation:
CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
K. Paige Harden
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Elliot M. Tucker-Drob
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Kaare Christensen
Affiliation:
The Danish Twin Registry, Institute of Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology and Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Axel Skytthe
Affiliation:
The Danish Twin Registry, Institute of Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Kirsten O. Kyvik
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Odense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Changhee Hong
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea
Youngsook Chong
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea
Catherine A. Derom
Affiliation:
Centre of Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Robert F. Vlietinck
Affiliation:
Centre of Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Ruth J. F. Loos
Affiliation:
The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, The Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Wendy Cozen
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Amie E. Hwang
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Thomas M. Mack
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Mingguang He
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Xiaohu Ding
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Billy Chang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Judy L. Silberg
Affiliation:
Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
Lindon J. Eaves
Affiliation:
Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
Hermine H. Maes
Affiliation:
Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Psychiatry & Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
Tessa L. Cutler
Affiliation:
The Australian Twin Registry, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
John L. Hopper
Affiliation:
The Australian Twin Registry, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Kelly Aujard
Affiliation:
Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Patrik K. E. Magnusson
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Nancy L. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Anna K. Dahl Aslan
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Institute of Gerontology, School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
Yun-Mi Song
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Sarah Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Kayoung Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
Laura A. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Catherine Tuvblad
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro, Sweden
Morten Bjerregaard-Andersen
Affiliation:
Bandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network, Apartado, Bissau Codex, Guinea-Bissau Research Center for Vitamins and Vaccines, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Henning Beck-Nielsen
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Morten Sodemann
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Kauko Heikkilä
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Qihua Tan
Affiliation:
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Dongfeng Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, China
Gary E. Swan
Affiliation:
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
Ruth Krasnow
Affiliation:
Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA
Kerry L. Jang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ariel Knafo-Noam
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
David Mankuta
Affiliation:
Hadassah Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
Lior Abramson
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Paul Lichtenstein
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Robert F. Krueger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Matt McGue
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Shandell Pahlen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Per Tynelius
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Glen E. Duncan
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Dedra Buchwald
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Robin P. Corley
Affiliation:
Institute for Behavioral Genetics, Boulder, CO, USA
Brooke M. Huibregtse
Affiliation:
Institute for Behavioral Genetics, Boulder, CO, USA
Tracy L. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Exercise Sciences and Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Keith E. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Carol E. Franz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
William S. Kremen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA VA San Diego Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
Michael J. Lyons
Affiliation:
Boston University, Department of Psychology, Boston, MA, USA
Syuichi Ooki
Affiliation:
Department of Health Science, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, Kahoku, Ishikawa, Japan
Ingunn Brandt
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Genes and Environment, Oslo, Norway
Thomas Sevenius Nilsen
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Genes and Environment, Oslo, Norway
Fujio Inui
Affiliation:
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan Faculty of Health Science, Kio University, Nara, Japan
Mikio Watanabe
Affiliation:
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Meike Bartels
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Toos C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Jane Wardle
Affiliation:
Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
Clare H. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
Abigail Fisher
Affiliation:
Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
Esther Rebato
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
Nicholas G. Martin
Affiliation:
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Yoshinori Iwatani
Affiliation:
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Kazuo Hayakawa
Affiliation:
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Finn Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Joohon Sung
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Jennifer R. Harris
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Genes and Environment, Oslo, Norway
Gonneke Willemsen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Andreas Busjahn
Affiliation:
HealthTwiSt GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Jack H. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Dorret I. Boomsma
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Yoon-Mi Hur
Affiliation:
Department of Education, Mokpo National University, Jeonnam, South Korea
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen
Affiliation:
Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Basic Metabolic Research, Section on Metabolic Genetics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, Copenhagen, The Capital Region, Denmark MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Jaakko Kaprio
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland Institute for Molecular Medicine FIMM, Helsinki, Finland
*
address for correspondence: Karri Silventoinen, Population Research Unit, Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 18, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: karri.silventoinen@helsinki.fi

Abstract

For over 100 years, the genetics of human anthropometric traits has attracted scientific interest. In particular, height and body mass index (BMI, calculated as kg/m2) have been under intensive genetic research. However, it is still largely unknown whether and how heritability estimates vary between human populations. Opportunities to address this question have increased recently because of the establishment of many new twin cohorts and the increasing accumulation of data in established twin cohorts. We started a new research project to analyze systematically (1) the variation of heritability estimates of height, BMI and their trajectories over the life course between birth cohorts, ethnicities and countries, and (2) to study the effects of birth-related factors, education and smoking on these anthropometric traits and whether these effects vary between twin cohorts. We identified 67 twin projects, including both monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, using various sources. We asked for individual level data on height and weight including repeated measurements, birth related traits, background variables, education and smoking. By the end of 2014, 48 projects participated. Together, we have 893,458 height and weight measures (52% females) from 434,723 twin individuals, including 201,192 complete twin pairs (40% monozygotic, 40% same-sex dizygotic and 20% opposite-sex dizygotic) representing 22 countries. This project demonstrates that large-scale international twin studies are feasible and can promote the use of existing data for novel research purposes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

The genetics of human anthropometric traits has long attracted scientific interest. Height is a prototypical anthropometric phenotype because it is approximately normally distributed and does not change in adulthood except for slight shrinking in old age. By the late 19th century, Galton (Reference Galton1886) analyzed height of parents and offspring and inferred that ‘when dealing with the transmission of stature from parents to children, the average height of the two parents is all we need care to know about them’. Later, Pearson and Lee (Reference Pearson and Lee1903) presented correlations of height between relatives, also suggesting genetic influence. The first heritability estimate of height was calculated by Fisher (Reference Fisher1918) in his seminal paper presenting the statistical principles of quantitative genetics. Interest in the genetic influences on height was renewed when genetic linkage studies enabled research into genetic effects over the whole genome on quantitative traits (Perola et al., Reference Perola, Sammalisto, Hiekkalinna, Martin, Visscher and Montgomery2007). Later genome-wide association (GWA) studies allowed for the genome-wide identification of candidate genes. In 2010, a large scale GWA study identified 180 loci associated for height (Lango Allen et al., Reference Lango Allen, Estrada, Lettre, Berndt, Weedon, Rivadeneira and Hirschhorn2010), and since then several large GWA studies have been published focusing on height on populations of European (Weedon et al., Reference Weedon, Lango, Lindgren, Wallace, Evans, Mangino and Frayling2008), Asian (Cho et al., Reference Cho, Go, Kim, Heo, Oh, Ban and Kim2009, Hao et al., Reference Hao, Liu, Lu, Yang, Wang, Chen and Gu2013; Okada et al., Reference Okada, Kamatani, Takahashi, Matsuda, Hosono, Ohmiya and Kamatani2010), and African ancestry (N’Diaye et al., Reference N’Diaye, Chen, Palmer, Ge, Tayo, Mathias and Haiman2011). The latest GWA study for height published in 2014 found 697 genetic polymorphisms associated with height in populations of European ancestry (Wood et al., Reference Wood, Esko, Yang, Vedantam, Pers, Gustafsson and Chu2014). As a polygenic and normally distributed trait, height serves also to explore new methodological approaches to human genetics, such as assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings (Hemani et al., Reference Hemani, Yang, Vinkhuyzen, Powell, Willemsen, Hottenga and Visscher2013; Visscher et al., Reference Visscher, Medland, Ferreira, Morley, Zhu, Cornes and Montgomery2006).

Genetic studies of obesity and BMI (calculated as kg/m2) also have a long history. In an article published in 1923, Davenport showed that the tendency for obesity varies between families, and he interpreted this finding to suggest genetic effects on obesity (Davenport, Reference Davenport1923). After this initial paper, the evidence on the genetic effects on obesity accumulated, and in 1966 a review paper on previous family studies concluded that genetic factors played an important role in obesity (Seltzer & Mayer, Reference Seltzer and Mayer1966). After this review, interest in the genetics of BMI has rapidly increased because of the health consequences and related impact on public health of increased mean BMI over the world. The studies by Stunkard and colleagues demonstrating the importance of genetic factors underlying variation in BMI in studies based on twin (Stunkard et al., Reference Stunkard, Foch and Hrubec1986a) and adoption data (Stunkard et al., Reference Stunkard, Sørensen, Hanis, Teasdale, Chakraborty, Schull and Schulsinger1986b; Reference Stunkard, Harris, Pedersen and McClearn1990) were a major achievement in this area. These findings corroborated earlier results reported on Finnish twins reared apart (Langinvainio et al., Reference Langinvainio, Koskenvuo, Kaprio and Sistonen1984). In 2007, the FTO gene was found to be associated with obesity in a case-control study of type 2 diabetes (Frayling et al., Reference Frayling, Timpson, Weedon, Zeggini, Freathy, Lindgren and McCarthy2007), and it is now recognized to be the most promising candidate gene of obesity. The latest GWA study on BMI identified 97 loci explaining 2.7% of the variation of BMI, while all measurable variants accounted for around 20% of the variance (Locke et al., Reference Locke, Kahali, Berndt, Justice, Pers, Day and Powell2015).

After over a hundred years of research, we might assume that the heritability of height and BMI is already well known. However, surprisingly little research is available on the variation of heritability estimates of height and BMI between populations. Changes in mean height (Eveleth & Tanner, Reference Eveleth and Tanner2003) and BMI (Finucane et al., Reference Finucane, Stevens, Cowan, Danaei, Lin and Paciorek2011) over time and changes in BMI across the human life span (Dahl et al., Reference Dahl, Reynolds, Fall, Magnusson and Pedersen2014) have been reported. According to basic principles of quantitative genetics, heritability estimates are not constant but rather are statistics describing the magnitude of genetic variation in a particular population and dependent on the underlying genetic make-up of the population under study and the environmental variation at play. Accordingly, these estimates may change over the life course and vary between study populations. A meta-analysis of nine twin studies found that the heritability of BMI increased over childhood and the effect of common environmental factors disappeared after mid-childhood (Silventoinen et al., Reference Silventoinen, Rokholm, Kaprio and Sørensen2010). Increasing heritability of height and BMI after early childhood was also found in a study of four twin cohorts (Dubois et al., Reference Dubois, Kyvik, Girard, Tatone-Tokuda, Perusse, Hjelmborg and Martin2012). However, these two studies did not reveal systematic variation in the heritability estimates between populations. A meta-analysis based on 88 independent heritability estimates of BMI reported inter-study variation in the heritability estimates, but meta-regression did not reveal any systematic patterns behind these differences (Elks et al., Reference Elks, Hoed, Zhao, Sharp, Wareham, Loos and Ong2012). It is possible that this negative result was due to methodological limitations since many of the heritability estimates were based on data covering large age ranges, birth cohorts and social classes, and the authors did not have access to the original data. Twin studies for adult height (Silventoinen et al., Reference Silventoinen, Sammalisto, Perola, Boomsma, Cornes, Davis and Kaprio2003) and BMI (Schousboe et al., Reference Schousboe, Willemsen, Kyvik, Mortensen, Boomsma, Cornes and Harris2003) in seven European populations and Australia also found some variation in heritability estimates but were not able to find systematic patterns in these estimates. A study based on eight populations of adolescent twins found higher genetic variance of height and weight in Caucasian as compared to East Asian populations; however, because total variance for height and BMI was also higher in Caucasian populations, the heritability estimates were approximately equivalent (Hur et al., Reference Hur, Kaprio, Iacono, Boomsma, McGue, Silventoinen and Mitchell2008). Thus, the previous meta-analyses have demonstrated the variation in the genetic components of height and BMI but have largely failed to identify factors behind the variation between populations.

The scant evidence on the variation of genetic and environmental contributions on height and BMI between populations may, however, reflect methodological limitations of previous studies rather than the lack of this type of variation. Previous studies conducted in Denmark (Rokholm et al., Reference Rokholm, Silventoinen, Angquist, Skytthe, Kyvik and Sørensen2011a) and Sweden (Rokholm et al., Reference Rokholm, Silventoinen, Tynelius, Gamborg, Sørensen and Rasmussen2011b) have demonstrated that genetic variation of BMI has increased over time in birth cohorts as the mean BMI increased; however, heritability estimates did not change. A Finnish study reported that environmental variation of height decreased especially in women from cohorts born at the beginning of the 20th century compared to those born after the World War II, leading to higher heritability estimates of height (Silventoinen et al., Reference Silventoinen, Kaprio, Lahelma and Koskenvuo2000). There is also evidence that parental social position may modify the genetic architecture of BMI in childhood (Lajunen et al., Reference Lajunen, Kaprio, Rose, Pulkkinen and Silventoinen2012). International comparisons addressing the methodological limitations of previous studies may be able to demonstrate comparable variation in genetic and environmental effects between populations.

During the recent decade, possibilities for international comparisons in twin studies have improved because of the establishment of new twin cohorts and the increasing accumulation of data in established twin cohorts. Thus, the number of twins available internationally for research has greatly increased, expanding the ability to examine ethnic, economic, and cultural variation between twin cohorts. These new opportunities to answer research questions not possible to address before led to the start of a new international research project: COllaborative project of Development of Anthropometrical measures in Twins (CODATwins). The aims of this project are to analyze systematically: (1) the variation of heritability estimates of height, BMI and their trajectories over the life course between birth cohorts, ethnicities, and countries; and (2) to study the effects of birth-related factors, education, and smoking on these anthropometric traits and whether these effects vary between twin cohorts. Additionally, this project aims to gain practical knowledge on the feasibility and opportunities offered by pooling a large number of twin cohorts as suggested by the International Network of Twin Registries (INTR) consortium (Buchwald et al., Reference Buchwald, Kaprio, Hopper, Sung, Goldberg, Fortier and Harris2014).

Collection of a Collaborative Database

We started the CODATwins project in May 2013 by identifying all twin projects in the world. The only criterion was the availability of data from both MZ and DZ twin pairs. The main sources used to identify the projects were a special issue of Twin Research and Human Genetics (Hur & Craig, Reference Hur and Craig2013) and the participants of the INTR consortium (Buchwald et al., Reference Buchwald, Kaprio, Hopper, Sung, Goldberg, Fortier and Harris2014, van Dongen et al., Reference van Dongen, Slagboom, Draisma, Martin and Boomsma2012); these sources were complemented by personal communications. Together we identified 67 eligible twin projects. We sent e-mail invitations to principle investigators of all these projects in September 2013 along with the study protocol. We asked the investigators to send us individual level data on height and weight including repeated measurements, birth-related traits (birth weight, birth length, birth order, and gestational age), background variables (twin identifier, sex, zygosity, ethnicity, birth year, and age at the time of measurements), education (own education for adults and mother's and father's education for children) and smoking for adults to the CODATwins data management center at the University of Helsinki. To those who did not respond, we sent reminders in October 2013, January 2014 and September 2014; with the final reminder, we sent the first year progress report including the list of all twin projects already collaborating with this project.

We did not receive a response from eight projects; internet searches (PubMed and Google) indicated that these projects had not been active in recent years and some of them may not even have ever been established. Eight projects declined: two because of lack of height and weight data, one because of lack of information on zygosity, and four because the delivery of the data was not possible to organize due to local regulations. One project informed that they are currently publishing their own results, but the data may become available later when the original articles have been published. Three projects that initially accepted the invitation have not sent data. Based on the correspondence, the main reason was the lack of resources to prepare the data file. By the end of 2014, 47 projects had sent data to the data management center. Additionally, one cohort is available through the remote access system but is not part of the pooled database. Figure 1 describes the accumulation of the CODATwins database.

FIGURE 1 Accumulation of the CODATwins database.

Structure of Database

Table 1 presents the twin cohorts participating in the CODATwins project. Because one twin project can include several cohorts, there are 54 twin cohorts available representing 22 countries. From these cohorts, 35 are longitudinal. Figure 2 presents the number of height and weight measures by sex and age. Together there are 893,458 measures. Children are well represented, and 41% of the measures were conducted at 18 years of age or younger. Overall, about half of the measures are for females (52%); however, the cohorts vary considerably regarding the proportion of their samples that are females and some cohorts include only males while others mainly include females (Supplementary Table 1). Most of the height and weight measures were self-reported (63%) or parentally reported (21%) and only a minority was based on measured values (16%). The reason is that data in the largest cohorts were collected by questionnaires, and the collection of clinical measures was generally conducted in cohorts smaller in size. In 27 cohorts we had additional information on birth weight and in most of these cohorts also had data on birth length (Supplementary Table 1). Together, we have 122,321 birth weight measures in the database; 77% of these measures were parentally reported, 17% self-reported and 6% clinically measured.

TABLE 1 Number of Height and Weight Measures in the Twin Cohorts Participating in the CODATwins Project

FIGURE 2 Number of height and weight measures by sex and age.

In total, data are available for 434,723 twin individuals having at least one height and weight measure. Most of the twins are from Europe (60%) and North-America (30%), followed by Australia (6%), East Asia (3%), South Asia, and the Middle East (1%) and Africa (less than 0.1%); no twin cohort is available from Latin America. Figure 3 presents the number of complete twin pairs by birth year and zygosity. Together there are 201,192 complete twin pairs. Among these pairs, 40% are MZ twins, 40% same-sex DZ twins, and 20% opposite-sex DZ twins. A quarter of the twin pairs (25%) were born in the 1980s and 1990s. The numbers of twin individuals and complete twin pairs by cohorts are presented in Supplementary Table 1.

FIGURE 3 Number of complete twin pairs by birth year and zygosity.

Discussion

We have successfully launched a large international twin collaboration, and our database now includes slightly over 200,000 complete twin pairs with height and weight measures from 22 countries. The vast majority of established twin cohorts responded positively to our request for individual level data. For some of the cohorts who did not participate, the reason was the lack of suitable data or that the cohort was no longer active. The value of pooling either summary data in GWA studies for height (Wood et al., Reference Wood, Esko, Yang, Vedantam, Pers, Gustafsson and Chu2014) and BMI (Locke et al., Reference Locke, Kahali, Berndt, Justice, Pers, Day and Powell2015) or pooling individual data for psychiatric conditions (Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2014) is well recognized. This project demonstrates that the same strategy can be used in classical twin research as well.

However, this project also revealed certain limitations with respect to available twin data. While European countries, especially in the northern and western parts of Europe, North America, and Australia are well represented, there is much less data on twins from other parts of the world. Our final database is heavily weighted toward European-origin populations following the Westernized lifestyle. The exception is East Asia, with several twin cohorts available from China, Japan, and South-Korea and one from Mongolia. Even though many of these non-Western cohorts are not very large, these cohorts do provide an invaluable resource for studying the potential genetic variations in anthropometric phenotypes. It was unfortunate that there are few twin cohorts from Southern Asia, Africa and all of South America. As pointed out earlier, there is a real need and value to the creation of new twin cohorts in the developing world (Sung et al., Reference Sung, Cho, Song, Lee, Choi, Ha and Kimm2006). Increasing collaboration between established twin projects can be helpful to stimulate new research activity and starting new twin projects (Buchwald et al., Reference Buchwald, Kaprio, Hopper, Sung, Goldberg, Fortier and Harris2014).

In addition to the lack of representation of specific ethnic groups among the registry populations included, another limitation is that the populations represented are relatively affluent populations. Of the four countries officially classified as non-industrialized countries represented in this project, only Guinea-Bissau can be regarded as a real developing country. In contrast, China and Sri Lanka are moderately affluent societies and enjoy life expectancy nearly comparable to the United States, whereas Mongolia can be regarded as a middle-income country with life expectancy at the level of East European countries (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Dwyer-Lindgren, Lofgren, Rajaratnam, Marcus, Levin-Rector and Murray2012). Anthropometric data from twin pairs in diverse populations going through the demographic transition would be invaluable in understanding the influence of broad societal change on many phenotypes. However, it is noteworthy that we have substantial variation in birth cohorts; the oldest twins were born at the end of 19th century and around one-fifth of them before 1940. Major changes in the prevalence of obesity and standard of living during the 20th century allow for the testing of different hypotheses as demonstrated before for BMI in Denmark (Rokholm et al., Reference Rokholm, Silventoinen, Angquist, Skytthe, Kyvik and Sørensen2011a) and Sweden (Rokholm et al., Reference Rokholm, Silventoinen, Tynelius, Gamborg, Sørensen and Rasmussen2011b) and height in Finland (Silventoinen et al., Reference Silventoinen, Sammalisto, Perola, Boomsma, Cornes, Davis and Kaprio2003).

When considering further collaborative twin research projects, it is noteworthy that only 16% of the height and weight measures were based on clinical measure, whereas the majority was obtained by self- or parental report. Height and weight are some of few anthropometric traits possible to measure relatively reliably based on self-report. Data on even the most basic metabolic traits such as blood glucose, blood pressure, and blood lipids would require clinical assessments that are currently lacking in many twin samples. This shows that even when there are many large twin cohorts available, more data collection using clinical measures is still needed. Height and weight are widely available in twin cohorts, and there is also much less variation in the measurement protocols of these traits compared to other anthropometric traits, such as waist circumference, making harmonization straightforward; the biggest difference we found was the measurement units used for height (cm vs. foot and inch) and weight (kg and g vs. pound and ounce). However, it is noteworthy that even for height and weight there can be differences in the precision of equipment used for measuring weight (scale) and height (tape, anthropometer or stadiometer). When examining other traits, availability of the data and differences in measurement protocols will increase challenges to data harmonization.

In addition to the anthropometric traits, we collected information on own education, parental education, and smoking. After reporting the main results for the anthropometric indicators, we will move to study how they are modified by education and smoking. Working with these variables is much more challenging compared to the anthropometric traits because of different classifications, varying educational systems, and large differences in mean levels of education between countries and birth cohorts. However, this variation also presents an opportunity because it allows for the study of these associations in very different environments and, for example, to study the relevance of absolute and relative education. In these future analyses, we can rely on work done to harmonize these variables in other contexts, such as the OECD classification of educational level (oecd.org) and the P3G consortium (p3g.org). This effort also demonstrates the potential of international collaborations of twin projects beyond calculating heritability estimates. For example, there are 10,410 adult MZ twin pairs discordant for BMI (more than 3 kg/m2) at least at one time point when measured at the same age in the database. Previous studies have demonstrated the high value of BMI discordant pairs for epigenetic research (Pietiläinen et al., Reference Pietiläinen, Naukkarinen, Rissanen, Saharinen, Ellonen, Keränen and Peltonen2008).

In conclusion, the CODATwins project demonstrates that large-scale international studies obtaining individual-level data from twin cohorts are feasible. Using the data from these twin cohorts creates novel opportunities for examining how genetic and environmental influences may vary across countries and regions. Future efforts in the CODATwins project will continue to extract from the substantial data already collected in the various twin projects in order to contribute to this objective.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted within the CODATwins project (Academy of Finland #266592). Support for participating twin projects: the University of Southern California Twin Study is funded by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH58354). The Carolina African American Twin Study of Aging (CAATSA) was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Aging (grant 1RO1-AG13662-01A2) to K. E. Whitfield. The NAS-NRC Twin Registry acknowledges financial support from the National Institutes of Health grant number R21 AG039572. Waves 1–3 of Genesis 12–19 were funded by the W T Grant Foundation, the University of London Central Research fund and a Medical Research Council Training Fellowship (G81/343) and Career Development Award (G120/635) to Thalia C. Eley. Wave 4 was supported by grants from the Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-22-2206) and the Institute of Social Psychiatry (06/07-11) to Alice M. Gregory who was also supported at that time by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship (RF/2/RFG/2008/0145). Wave 5 was supported by funding to Alice M. Gregory from Goldsmiths, University of London. Anthropometric measurements of the Hungarian twins were supported by Medexpert Ltd., Budapest, Hungary. South Korea Twin Registry is supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-371-2011-1 B00047). The Danish Twin Registry is supported by the National Program for Research Infrastructure 2007 from the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, The Research Council for Health and Disease, the Velux Foundation and the US National Institute of Health (P01 AG08761). Since its origin, the East Flanders Prospective Survey has been partly supported by grants from the Fund of Scientific Research, Flanders and Twins, a non-profit Association for Scientific Research in Multiple Births (Belgium). Korean Twin-Family Register was supported by the Global Research Network Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF 2011-220-E00006). The Colorado Twin Registry is funded by NIDA funded center grant DA011015 and Longitudinal Twin Study HD10333; Author Huibregtse is supported by 5T32DA017637-10. The Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging was supported by National Institute of Health grants NIA R01 AG018384, R01 AG018386, R01 AG022381, and R01 AG022982, and, in part, with resources of the VA San Diego Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health. The Cooperative Studies Program of the Office of Research & Development of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs has provided financial support for the development and maintenance of the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIA/NIH, or the VA. The Australian Twin Registry is supported by a Centre of Research Excellence (grant ID 1079102) from the National Health and Medical Research Council administered by the University of Melbourne. The Michigan State University Twin Registry has been supported by Michigan State University, as well as grants R01-MH081813, R01-MH0820-54, R01-MH092377-02, R21-MH070542-01, R03-MH63851-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), R01-HD066040 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and 11-SPG-2518 from the MSU Foundation. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIMH, the NICHD, or the National Institutes of Health. The California Twin Program was supported by The California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (7RT-0134H, 8RT-0107H, 6RT-0354H) and the National Institutes of Health (1R01ESO15150-01). The Guangzhou Twin Eye Study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant #81125007). PETS was supported by grants from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (grant numbers 437015 and 607358 to JC, and RS), the Bonnie Babes Foundation (grant number BBF20704 to JMC), the Financial Markets Foundation for Children (grant no. 032-2007 to JMC), and by the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program. Data collection and analyses in Finnish twin cohorts have been supported by ENGAGE –– European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology, FP7-HEALTH-F4–2007, grant agreement number 201413, National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (grants AA-12502, AA-00145, and AA-09203 to R. J. Rose, the Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics (grant numbers: 213506, 129680), and the Academy of Finland (grants 100499, 205585, 118555, 141054, 265240, 263278 and 264146 to J. Kaprio). K. Silventoinen is supported by Osaka University's International Joint Research Promotion Program. S. Y. Oncel and F. Aliev are supported by Kirikkale University Research Grant: KKU, 2009/43 and TUBITAK grant 114C117. The Longitudinal Israeli Study of Twins was funded by the Starting Grant no. 240994 from the European Research Council (ERC) to Ariel Knafo. Data collection and research stemming from the Norwegian Twin Registry is supported, in part, from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programmes ENGAGE Consortium (grant agreement HEALTH-F4-2007-201413, and BioSHaRE EU (grant agreement HEALTH-F4-2010-261433). The Murcia Twin Registry is supported by the Seneca Foundation, Regional Agency for Science and Technology, Murcia, Spain (08633/PHCS/08 & 15302/PHCS/10) and Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain (PSI11560-2009). The Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) is supported by a program grant (G0901245) from the UK Medical Research Council and the work on obesity in TEDS is supported in part by a grant from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (31/D19086). The Madeira data comes from the following project: genetic and environmental influences on physical activity, fitness, and health: the Madeira family study Project reference: POCI/DES/56834/2004 founded by the Portuguese agency for research (The Foundation for Science and Technology). The Boston University Twin Project is funded by grants (#R01 HD068435 #R01 MH062375) from the National Institutes of Health to K. Saudino. TwinsUK was funded by the Wellcome Trust; European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013). The study also receives support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BioResource Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The University of Washington Twin Registry is supported by the grant NIH RC2 HL103416 (D. Buchwald, PI). The Netherlands Twin Register acknowledges the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and MagW/ZonMW grants 904-61-090, 985-10-002, 912-10-020, 904-61-193,480-04-004, 463-06-001, 451-04-034, 400-05-717, Addiction-31160008, Middelgroot-911-09-032, Spinozapremie 56-464-14192; VU University's Institute for Health and Care Research (EMGO+); the European Research Council (ERC - 230374), the Avera Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota (USA). Gemini was supported by a grant from Cancer Research UK (C1418/A7974).

Supplementary Material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/thg.2015.29.

References

Avinun, R., & Knafo, A. (2013). The Longitudinal Israeli Study of Twins (LIST) — An integrative view of social development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 197201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. A., Tuvblad, C., Wang, P., Gomez, K., Bezdjian, S., Niv, S., & Raine, A. (2013). The Southern California Twin Register at the university of Southern California: III. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 336343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjerregaard-Andersen, M., Gomes, M. A., Joaquim, L. C., Rodrigues, A., Jensen, D. M., Christensen, K., . . . Benn, C. S. (2013). Establishing a twin registry in Guinea-Bissau. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 179184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., Dionne, G., Dubois, L., Perusse, D., Robaey, P., . . . Tremblay, R. E. (2013). The Quebec Newborn Twin Study into adolescence: 15 years later. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 6469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brescianini, S., Fagnani, C., Toccaceli, V., Medda, E., Nistico, L., D’Ippolito, C., . . . Stazi, M. A. (2013). An update on the Italian Twin Register: Advances in cohort recruitment, project building and network development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 190196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchwald, D., Kaprio, J., Hopper, J. L., Sung, J., Goldberg, J., Fortier, I., . . . Harris, J. R. (2014). International Network of Twin Registries (INTR): Building a platform for international collaboration. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 17, 574577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, S. A., & Klump, K. L. (2013). The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): An update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 344350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busjahn, A. (2013). HealthTwiSt: The Berlin Twin Registry for health research. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 163166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Y. S., Go, M. J., Kim, Y. J., Heo, J. Y., Oh, J. H., Ban, H. J., . . . Kim, H. L. (2009). A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits. Nature Genetics, 41, 527534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cozen, W., Hwang, A. E., Cockburn, M. G., Hamilton, A. S., Zadnick, J., & Mack, T. M. (2013). The USC Adult Twin Cohorts: International twin study and California twin program. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 366370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahl, A. K., Reynolds, C. A., Fall, T., Magnusson, P. K., & Pedersen, N. L. (2014). Multifactorial analysis of changes in body mass index across the adult life course: A study with 65 years of follow-up. International Journal of Obesity, 38, 11331141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, C. B. (1923). Body-build and its inheritance. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derom, C., Thiery, E., Peeters, H., Vlietinck, R., Defoort, P., & Frijns, J. P. (2013). The East Flanders Prospective Twin Survey (EFPTS): An actual perception. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 5863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, H., Ning, F., Zhang, D., Wang, S., Zhang, D., Tan, Q., . . . Tian, X. (2013). The Qingdao Twin Registry: A status update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 7985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, L., Ohm Kyvik, K., Girard, M., Tatone-Tokuda, F., Perusse, D., Hjelmborg, J., . . . Martin, N. G. (2012). Genetic and environmental contributions to weight, height, and BMI from birth to 19 years of age: An international study of over 12,000 twin pairs. PloS One, 7, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elks, C. E., den Hoed, M., Zhao, J. H., Sharp, S. J., Wareham, N. J., Loos, R. J., & Ong, K. K. (2012). Variability in the heritability of body mass index: A systematic review and meta-regression. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 3, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eveleth, P. B., & Tanner, J. M. (2003). Worldwide variation in human growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finucane, M. M., Stevens, G. A., Cowan, M. J., Danaei, G., Lin, J. K., Paciorek, C. J., . . . Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Body Mass Index). (2011). National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet, 377, 557567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52, 399433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frayling, T. M., Timpson, N. J., Weedon, M. N., Zeggini, E., Freathy, R. M., Lindgren, C. M., . . . McCarthy, M. I. (2007). A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science, 316, 889894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galton, F. (1886). Regression towards mediocrity in heriditary stature. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 15, 246262.Google Scholar
Gatz, M., Harris, J. R., Kaprio, J., McGue, M., Smith, N. L., Snieder, H., . . . for the Institute of Medicine Committee on Twins Studies. (2014). Cohort profile: The National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Twin Registry (NAS-NRC Twin Registry). International Journal of Epidemiology. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Gombojav, B., Damdinbazar, O., Danshiitsoodol, N., Dagvasumberel, G., Purevdorj, E., Gombojav, E., . . . Sung, J. (2013a). Resources and pilot results for establishing a Mongolian Twin Register. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 248251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gombojav, B., Song, Y. M., Lee, K., Yang, S., Kho, M., Hwang, Y. C., . . . Ko, G. (2013b). The Healthy Twin Study, Korea updates: Resources for omics and genome epidemiology studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 241245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hao, Y., Liu, X., Lu, X., Yang, X., Wang, L., Chen, S., . . . Gu, D. (2013). Genome-wide association study in Han Chinese identifies three novel loci for human height. Human Genetics, 132, 681689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harden, K. P., Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Tackett, J. L. (2013). The Texas Twin Project. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 385390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haworth, C. M., Davis, O. S., & Plomin, R. (2013). Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): A genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 117125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayakawa, K., Iwatani, Y., & Osaka Twin Research Group. (2013). An overview of multidisciplinary research resources at the Osaka University Center for Twin Research. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 217220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemani, G., Yang, J., Vinkhuyzen, A., Powell, J. E., Willemsen, G., Hottenga, J. J., . . . Visscher, P. M. (2013). Inference of the genetic architecture underlying BMI and height with the use of 20,240 sibling pairs. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93, 865875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, J. L., Foley, D. L., White, P. A., & Pollaers, V. (2013). Australian Twin Registry: 30 years of progress. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 3442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hur, Y. M., & Craig, J. M. (2013). Twin registries worldwide: An important resource for scientific research. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hur, Y. M., Jeong, H. U., Chung, K. W., Shin, J. S., & Song, T. B. (2013). The South Korean Twin Registry: An update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 237240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hur, Y. M., Kaprio, J., Iacono, W. G., Boomsma, D. I., McGue, M., Silventoinen, K., . . . Mitchell, K. (2008). Genetic influences on the difference in variability of height, weight and body mass index between Caucasian and East Asian adolescent twins. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 14551467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2002). Minnesota Twin Family Study. Twin Research, 5, 482487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, K. L. (2013). The University of British Columbia Twin Project: Still figuring out what personality is and does. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 7072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., Bleidorn, W., Thiel, W., & Angleitner, A. (2013). The Bielefeld Longitudinal study of adult twins (BiLSAT). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 167172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaprio, J. (2013). The finnish twin cohort study: An update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 157162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krasnow, R. E., Jack, L. M., Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N., Bergen, A. W., & Swan, G. E. (2013). The twin research registry at SRI international. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 463470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kremen, W. S., Franz, C. E., & Lyons, M. J. (2013). VETSA: The Vietnam Era twin study of aging. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 399402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F., & Johnson, W. (2002). The Minnesota twin registry: Current status and future directions. Twin Research, 5, 488492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lajunen, H. R., Kaprio, J., Rose, R. J., Pulkkinen, L., & Silventoinen, K. (2012). Genetic and environmental influences on BMI from late childhood to adolescence are modified by parental education. Obesity, 20, 583589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langinvainio, H., Koskenvuo, M., Kaprio, J., & Sistonen, P. (1984). Finnish twins reared apart. II: Validation of zygosity, environmental dissimilarity and weight and height. Acta Geneticae Medicae Gemellologiae, 33, 251258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lango Allen, H., Estrada, K., Lettre, G., Berndt, S. I., Weedon, M. N., Rivadeneira, F., . . . Hirschhorn, J. N. (2010). Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature, 467, 832838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtenstein, P., Tuvblad, C., Larsson, H., & Carlstrom, E. (2007). The Swedish Twin study of Child and Adolescent Development: The TCHAD-study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 6773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilley, E. C., & Silberg, J. L. (2013). The Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry, revisited. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 424428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littvay, L., Metneki, J., Tarnoki, A. D., & Tarnoki, D. L. (2013). The Hungarian Twin Registry. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 185189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J. Z., Medland, S. E., Wright, M. J., Henders, A. K., Heath, A. C., Madden, P. A., . . . McRae, A. F. (2010). Genome-wide association study of height and body mass index in Australian twin families. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13, 179193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, A. E., Kahali, B., Berndt, S. I., Justice, A. E., Pers, T. H., Day, F. R., . . . Powell, C. (2015). Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature, 518, 197206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loke, Y. J., Novakovic, B., Ollikainen, M., Wallace, E. M., Umstad, M. P., Permezel, M., . . . Craig, J. M. (2013). The Peri/postnatal Epigenetic Twins Study (PETS). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnusson, P. K., Almqvist, C., Rahman, I., Ganna, A., Viktorin, A., Walum, H., . . . Lichtenstein, P. (2013). The Swedish Twin Registry: Establishment of a biobank and other recent developments. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 317329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maia, J. A., Santos, D., de Freitas, D. L., & Thomis, M. (2013). Physical activity, physical fitness, gross motor coordination, and metabolic syndrome: Focus of twin research in Portugal. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 296301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdams, T. A., Gregory, A. M., Rowe, R., Zavos, H. M., Barclay, N. L., Lau, J. Y., . . . Maughan, B. (2013). The Genesis 12–19 (G1219) Study: A twin and sibling study of gene-environment interplay and adolescent development in the UK. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 134143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moayyeri, A., Hammond, C. J., Hart, D. J., & Spector, T. D. (2013). The UK Adult Twin Registry (TwinsUK Resource). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 144149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
N’Diaye, A., Chen, G. K., Palmer, C. D., Ge, B., Tayo, B., Mathias, R. A., . . . Haiman, C. A. (2011). Identification, replication, and fine-mapping of Loci associated with adult height in individuals of african ancestry. PLoS Genetics, 7, 111.Google ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, T. S., Knudsen, G. P., Gervin, K., Brandt, I., Røysamb, E., Tambs, K., . . . Harris, J. R. (2013). The Norwegian Twin Registry from a public health perspective: A research update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 285295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okada, Y., Kamatani, Y., Takahashi, A., Matsuda, K., Hosono, N., Ohmiya, H., . . . Kamatani, N. (2010). A genome-wide association study in 19,633 Japanese subjects identified LHX3-QSOX2 and IGF1 as adult height loci. Human Molecular Genetics, 19, 23032312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öncel, S. Y., & Aliev, F. (2013). Turkish twin study: An initial step. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 333335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ooki, S. (2013). Japanese database of families with twins and higher-order multiples. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 221225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordoñana, J. R., Rebollo-Mesa, I., Carrillo, E., Colodro-Conde, L., García-Palomo, F. J., González-Javier, F., . . . Pérez-Riquelme, F. (2013). The Murcia Twin Registry: A population-based registry of adult multiples in Spain. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 302306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, K., & Lee, A. (1903). On the laws on inheritance in man. Biometrika, 2, 356462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perola, M., Sammalisto, S., Hiekkalinna, T., Martin, N. G., Visscher, P. M., Montgomery, G. W., . . . GenomEUtwin Project. (2007). Combined genome scans for body stature in 6,602 European twins: Evidence for common Caucasian loci. PLoS Genetics, 3, 10191028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietiläinen, K. H., Naukkarinen, J., Rissanen, A., Saharinen, J., Ellonen, P., Keränen, H., . . . Peltonen, L. (2008). Global transcript profiles of fat in monozygotic twins discordant for BMI: Pathways behind acquired obesity. PLoS Medicine, 5, 472483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, F., Kark, M., Tholin, S., Karnehed, N., & Tynelius, P. (2006). The Swedish Young Male Twins Study: A resource for longitudinal research on risk factors for obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 883889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhea, S. A., Gross, A. A., Haberstick, B. C., & Corley, R. P. (2013). Colorado Twin Registry: An update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 351357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rokholm, B., Silventoinen, K., Angquist, L., Skytthe, A., Kyvik, K. O., & Sørensen, T. I. (2011a). Increased genetic variance of BMI with a higher prevalence of obesity. PloS One, 6, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rokholm, B., Silventoinen, K., Tynelius, P., Gamborg, M., Sørensen, T. I., & Rasmussen, F. (2011b). Increasing genetic variance of body mass index during the Swedish obesity epidemic. PloS One, 6, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saudino, K. J., & Asherson, P. (2013). The Boston University Twin Project (BUTP). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 449450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. (2014). Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature, 511, 421427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schousboe, K., Willemsen, G., Kyvik, K. O., Mortensen, J., Boomsma, D. I., Cornes, B. K., . . . Harris, J. R. (2003). Sex differences in heritability of BMI: A comparative study of results from twin studies in eight countries. Twin Research, 6, 409421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seltzer, C. C., & Mayer, J. (1966). A review of genetic and constitutional factors in human obesity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 134, 688695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silventoinen, K., Kaprio, J., Lahelma, E., & Koskenvuo, M. (2000). Relative effect of genetic and environmental factors on body height: Differences across birth cohorts among Finnish men and women. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 627630.Google ScholarPubMed
Silventoinen, K., Rokholm, B., Kaprio, J., & Sørensen, T. I. A. (2010). The genetic and environmental influences on childhood obesity: A systematic review of twin and adoption studies. International Journal of Obesity, 34, 2940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silventoinen, K., Sammalisto, S., Perola, M., Boomsma, D. I., Cornes, B. K., Davis, C., . . . Kaprio, J. (2003). Heritability of adult body height: A comparative study of twin cohorts in eight countries. Twin Research, 6, 399408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skytthe, A., Christiansen, L., Kyvik, K. O., Bodker, F. L., Hvidberg, L., Petersen, I., . . . Christensen, K. (2013). The Danish Twin Registry: Linking surveys, national registers, and biological information. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 104111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strachan, E., Hunt, C., Afari, N., Duncan, G., Noonan, C., Schur, E., . . . Watson, N. (2013). University of Washington Twin Registry: Poised for the next generation of twin research. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 455462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, A. J., Foch, T. T., & Hrubec, Z. (1986a). A twin study of human obesity. JAMA, 256, 5154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, A. J., Harris, J. R., Pedersen, N. L., & McClearn, G. E. (1990). The body-mass index of twins who have been reared apart. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 14831487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, A. J., Sørensen, T. I., Hanis, C., Teasdale, T. W., Chakraborty, R., Schull, W. J., & Schulsinger, F. (1986b). An adoption study of human obesity. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 193198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumathipala, A., Siribaddana, S., Hotopf, M., McGuffin, P., Glozier, N., Ball, H., . . . Gunewardane, D. (2013). The Sri Lankan Twin Registry: 2012 update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 307312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, J., Cho, S. I., Song, Y. M., Lee, K., Choi, E. Y., Ha, M., . . . Kimm, K. (2006). Do we need more twin studies? The Healthy Twin Study, Korea. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 488490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Beijsterveldt, C. E., Groen-Blokhuis, M., Hottenga, J. J., Franic, S., Hudziak, J. J., Lamb, D., . . . Boomsma, D. I. (2013). The Young Netherlands Twin Register (YNTR): Longitudinal twin and family studies in over 70,000 children. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 252267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dongen, J., Slagboom, P. E., Draisma, H. H., Martin, N. G., & Boomsma, D. I. (2012). The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 640653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Jaarsveld, C. H., Johnson, L., Llewellyn, C., & Wardle, J. (2010). Gemini: A UK twin birth cohort with a focus on early childhood weight trajectories, appetite and the family environment. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13, 7278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Medland, S. E., Ferreira, M. A., Morley, K. I., Zhu, G., Cornes, B. K., . . . Montgomery, G. W. (2006). Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genetics, 2, 316325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H., Dwyer-Lindgren, L., Lofgren, K. T., Rajaratnam, J. K., Marcus, J. R., Levin-Rector, A., . . . Murray, C. J. (2012). Age-specific and sex-specific mortality in 187 countries, 1970–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380, 20712094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weedon, M. N., Lango, H., Lindgren, C. M., Wallace, C., Evans, D. M., Mangino, M., . . . Frayling, T. M. (2008). Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height. Nature Genetics, 40, 575583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitfield, K. E. (2013). A registry of adult African American twins: The Carolina African American Twin Study of Aging. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 476480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willemsen, G., Vink, J. M., Abdellaoui, A., den Braber, A., van Beek, J. H., Draisma, H. H., . . . Boomsma, D. I. (2013). The Adult Netherlands Twin Register: Twenty-five years of survey and biological data collection. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 271281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, A. R., Esko, T., Yang, J., Vedantam, S., Pers, T. H., Gustafsson, S., . . . Chu, A. Y. (2014). Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nature Genetics, 46, 11731186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yokoyama, Y. (2013). The West Japan Twins and Higher Order Multiple Births Registry. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 231236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, Y., Ding, X., Chen, Y., & He, M. (2013). The Guangzhou Twin Project: An update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 7378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

FIGURE 1 Accumulation of the CODATwins database.

Figure 1

TABLE 1 Number of Height and Weight Measures in the Twin Cohorts Participating in the CODATwins Project

Figure 2

FIGURE 2 Number of height and weight measures by sex and age.

Figure 3

FIGURE 3 Number of complete twin pairs by birth year and zygosity.

Supplementary material: File

Silventoinen supplementary material

Table S1

Download Silventoinen supplementary material(File)
File 27.3 KB