Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:30:27.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietitians’ attitudes towards meat-alternatives in food-based dietary guidelines: findings from a survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

H.J. Roper
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
E. Lanza
Affiliation:
British Dietetic Association, Birmingham, UK
J. Lewis
Affiliation:
British Dietetic Association, Birmingham, UK
H.E. Theobald
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
I.T. Kelly
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2022

Sustainable diets, which contribute to food security and health are the focus of many policy discussions around the world. The translation of sustainable diets into national and regional dietary guidance is necessary for shifts in population-based behaviour. Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) are one such tool for conveying dietary advice, indeed, the National Food Strategy recommends that ‘an updated “reference diet” for the nation’ should be developed’ which considers both health and sustainability. However, many, including the UK EatWell Guide, have not specifically considered sustainability in their development That said, following the Eatwell Guide has a lower environmental impact than the typical UK diet (2). Dietitians frequently use the Eatwell Guide to disseminate dietary advice to patients/clients. To understand whether dietitians agree with the inclusion of the latest sustainability principles within the UK FBDGs, all dietitians who are members of the British Dietetic Association (BDA) were invited to participate in an online survey (Google Forms, Menlo Park, California) via e-mail between 25th November and 18th December 2021. The survey assessed attitudes towards sustainability and alternative proteins, including mycoprotein (a protein derived from fungi) within FBDGs, as part of a larger multiple-choice survey, which aimed to identify views on various public health issues. Three questions focused on the EatWell Guide, with five additional questions on sustainability within their professional practice. A total of 188 responses were received. Respondents worked in a wide variety of specialties including 23.9% (n = 45) in weight management, 18.6% (n = 35) in parenteral nutrition and 16.5% (n = 35) in diabetes and pediatrics equally 2.7% (n = 5) reported working within the field of sustainability. A total of 72.3% (n = 136) of dietitians agreed that the EatWell Guide should be updated to better reflect sustainable diets. When asked where they thought meat-alternatives should be represented within FBDGs, 91.5% (n = 172) stated that they should be visually represented among the protein food group and 81.9% (n = 154) agreed that mycoprotein should also be included in this food group pictorially.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the majority of dietitians surveyed agreed that it is time for an update of the UK FBDGs to incorporate latest sustainability understanding and that protein-based meat-alternatives, including mycoprotein should be visually represented in the EatWell Guide. Further research should be undertaken to validate these findings with a wider sample of healthcare professionals and shared with policymakers. Plant-forward diets, and those containing meat- alternatives, including fungal proteins, are being encouraged by thought-leaders around the world in order to ensure sustainable, healthy food systems that are able to feed a growing global population in a world facing resource constraints and climate change (Reference Willett, Rockström and Loken3,Reference Derbyshire4) .

Acknowledgments

Marlow Foods for funding of the survey.

References

The National Food Strategy (2021) The plan.Google Scholar
Public Health England (2016) From plate to Guide.Google Scholar
Willett, W, Rockström, J, Loken, B, et al. . (2019) Lancet 10170, 447492.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derbyshire, E (2022) Foods 11, 647.10.3390/foods11050647CrossRefGoogle Scholar