Book contents
- Language Change
- Language Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Pooling Perspectives
- 1 Calling Englishes As Complex Dynamic Systems: Diffusion and Restructuring
- 2 English as a Lingua Franca in the Context of a Sociolinguistic Typology of Contact Languages
- 3 How Writing Changes Language
- 4 ELF and Translation As Language Contact
- 5 Present-Day Standard English
- 6 Beyond Language Change
- Part II Zooming in on ELF
- Index
- References
1 - Calling Englishes As Complex Dynamic Systems: Diffusion and Restructuring
from Part I - Pooling Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2020
Book contents
- Language Change
- Language Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Pooling Perspectives
- 1 Calling Englishes As Complex Dynamic Systems: Diffusion and Restructuring
- 2 English as a Lingua Franca in the Context of a Sociolinguistic Typology of Contact Languages
- 3 How Writing Changes Language
- 4 ELF and Translation As Language Contact
- 5 Present-Day Standard English
- 6 Beyond Language Change
- Part II Zooming in on ELF
- Index
- References
Summary
This paper advocates the theory of 'Complex Dynamic Systems', developed in the sciences as a suitable framework for the understanding of the evolution of varieties and uses of English through time and space. After looking into earlier applications of this theory in linguistics, it surveys core properties of such systems and illustrates their relevance by applications to specific processes of change in the history of English. It then investigates processes of lexicosemantic diffusion and syntactic restructuring in World Englishes within this framework, trying to document its applicability.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language ChangeThe Impact of English as a Lingua Franca, pp. 15 - 43Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Aarts, Bas. 1992. Small Clauses in English. The Nonverbal Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2001. Was/were variation in non-standard British English today. English World-Wide 22, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James 1973. Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Tom. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(s1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Bossomaier, Terry R. J. & Green, David G. (eds.). 2000. Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 2006–2007. Geolinguistic patterns in a vast speech community. Linguistica Atlantica 27(28), 27–36.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1994. Standardization and the English irregular verbs. In Stein, Dieter & van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800, 115–133. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter (ed.) 2015. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue. 2012. Modals and quasi-modals in New Englishes. In Hundt & Gut 2012, 35–53.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 2013. Grammar and Complexity: Language at the Intersection of Competence and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2008. The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 92(2), 232–249.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2011. The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system. In Simpson, James (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 666–679. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane (eds.). 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Malden, MA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga & van der Wurff, Wim. 2006. Syntax. In Hogg, Richard & Denison, David (eds.), A History of the English Language, 109–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana (eds.). 2017. Changing English. Global and Local Perspectives. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guastello, Stephen J., Koopmans, Matthijs & Pincus, David (eds.) 2009. Chaos and Complexity in Psychology. The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2014. The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. In Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus & Kautzsch, Alexander (eds.), The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and Beyond, 160–180. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 2014. Complexity. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Gut, Ulrike (eds.). 2012. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, Neil. 2009. Simply Complexity. A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
KASELL (Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics). Dec. 2013. Proceedings. Seoul: KASELL.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koch, Christopher, Lange, Claudia & Leuckert, Sven. 2016. “This hair-style called as ‘duck tail’”: The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English and Learner Englishes. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2), 151–176.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W. et al. (eds.). 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English. 2 vols. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.). 2012. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R., Jr. 2009. The Linguistics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R., Jr. 2015. Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Cambridge, MA, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2018. Placing ELF among the varieties of English. In Deshors, Sandra C. (ed.), Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESL Varieties, 109–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2016. The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English. World Englishes 35(1), 133–146.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18(2), 141–165.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2013. Complexity Theory/Dynamic systems theory. In Robinson, Peter (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, 103–106. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Cameron, Lynne. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, MacNeilage, Peter & Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1984. Self-organizing processes and the explanation of language universals. In Butterworth, B., Comrie, Bernard & Dahl, Östen (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals, 181–203. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh. 2008. World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius & Karlsson, Fred (eds.). 2008. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Milroy, Jim & Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21, 339–384.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley & Llamas, Carmen. 2013. Social networks. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 409–427. Malden, MA, Osford: Wiley-Blackwell,Google Scholar
Mobus, George E. & Kalton, Michael C.. 2015. Principles of Systems Science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S., Coupé, Christophe & Pellegrino, Francois. 2017. Complexity in Language. Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide 27, 147–173Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederic J. & Preston, Laurel B. (eds.). 2014. Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2015. Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve model in diachronic studies of language change. In Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina (ed.), Can We Predict Linguistic Change? (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 16). http://helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/16/.Google Scholar
Pitzl, Marie-Luise & Osimk-Teasdale, Ruth (eds.). 2016. English as a Lingua Franca: Perspectives and Prospects. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2009. One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David & Trudgill, Peter (eds.). 2009. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1989. American Earlier Black English. Morphological and Syntactic Variables. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1997a. Chaos theory as a model for dialect variability and change? In Thomas, Alan R. (ed.), Issues and Methods in Dialectology, 22–36. Bangor: Department of Linguistics, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1997b. As as “is”. Is as “is”? In Fries, Udo et al. (eds.), From Aelfric to the New York Times. Studies in English Corpus Linguistics, 33–50. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2011a. English around the World: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2011b. English into Asia: From Singaporean ubiquity to Chinese learners’ features. In Curzan, Anne & Adams, Michael (eds.), Contours of English and English Language Studies: In Honor of Richard W. Bailey, 135–156. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. On the relationship between the cognitive and the communal: a complex systems perspective. In Filppula, et al. (eds.), 277–310.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin, Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina (eds.). 2016. Re-Assessing the Present Perfect. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by