Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:53:10.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant on Moral Satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Michael Walschots
Michael Walschots*
Affiliation:
University of St. Andrews
*
Email: mhwalschots@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper gives an account of Kant’s concept of self-contentment (Selbstzufriedenheit), i.e. the satisfaction involved in the performance of moral action. This concept is vulnerable to an important objection: if moral action is satisfying, it might only ever be performed for the sake of this satisfaction. I explain Kant’s response to this objection and argue that it is superior to Francis Hutcheson’s response to a similar objection. I conclude by showing that two other notions of moral satisfaction in Kant’s moral philosophy, namely ‘sweet merit’ and the highest good, also avoid the objection.

Keywords

self-contentmentGarveHutchesoneudaimonismpleasurehappinessmoral motivation
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 281 - 303
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Lewis White (1960) A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, John D. (1996) ‘Moral Motivation and the Development of Hutcheson’s Philosophy’. Journal of the History of Ideas, 57(2), 277–295.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2007) ‘Kant on the Agreeable and the Good’. In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Moral Psychology (Amsterdam: Rodopi), pp. 111–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2015) ‘Ancient Insights in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good’. In Lara Denis and Oliver Sensen (eds), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 103–119.Google Scholar
Forman, David (2016) ‘Kant’s Moderate Cynicism and the Harmony between Virtue and Worldly Happiness’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54(1), 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garve, Christian (1792) Versuche aus verschiedene Gegenstände der Moral, Literatur und dem gesellschaftlichen Leben, part 1. Breslau: Korn.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1756) Sittenlehre der Gesellschaft. Hamburg and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1998) An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Ed. Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2004) An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue . Ed. with Introduction by Wolfgang Leidhold. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900ff.) Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie Ausgabe). Vol. 1–24ff. Ed. Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften (and successors). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
McCarty, Richard (2009) Kant’s Theory of Action . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich (1987) Werke, vol. 1. Ed. G. Fricke and H. G. Göpfert. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2010) The World as Will and Representation, vol. 1. Trans. and ed. Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2007) Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2015) ‘Divine Existence and Moral Motivation’. In Joachim Aufderheide and Ralf M. Bader (eds), The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 683–692.Google Scholar
Warda, Arthur (1922) Kants Bücher. Berlin: Martin Breslauer.Google Scholar
Ware, Owen (2014) ‘Kant on Moral Sensibility and Moral Motivation’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52(4), 727–746.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1733) Vernunftige Gedanken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen zur Beförderung ihrer Glückseligkeit. 4th edition. Halle.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1970) Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar