Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:53:12.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Table of Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2021

Edited by
Helmut Philipp Aust  and
Thomas Kleinlein
Helmut Philipp Aust
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Thomas Kleinlein
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Encounters between Foreign Relations Law and International Law
Bridges and Boundaries
 , pp. xiii - xxiv
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Note on ordering: Cases are ordered alphabetically if cited with case names, otherwise the order is chronological.

International Cases

I Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)

  • Case concerning certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia, Merits, PCIJ Series A, No. 7, 1926, p. 46

  • Case of the S.S. ‘Lotus’, Judgment, Series A No. 10, pp. 10, 166

  • Case of the S.S. ‘Wimbledon’, Judgment, Series A No. 1, p. 166

II International Court of Justice (ICJ)

  • Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India), Jurisdiction of the Court, I.C.J. Reports 2000, pp. 12, 98

  • Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2004, pp. 12, 350

  • Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Separate Opinion of Judge Bula-Bula, I.C.J. Reports 2002, pp. 100, 47

  • East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1995, p. 90

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012, pp. 99, 365

  • Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equitorial Guinea intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2002, pp. 303, 30, 52

  • Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2019, pp. 95, 365

  • Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2017, pp. 3, 52

  • North Sea Continental Shelf cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, pp. 3, 229

  • Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2010, pp. 14, 3, 326

  • Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Merits), Judgment 12 April 1960, I.C.J. Reports 6, p. 99

III Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

  • Chevron Corporation and Texaco Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Case No. 2009–23, Second Partial Award on Track II, 30 August 2018, p. 79

  • Swissbourgh Diamond Mines and Others v. the Kingdom of Lesotho, Case-2013–29, Partial Final Award on Merits and Jurisdiction, 18 April 2016, p. 223

IV European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

  • Al-Skeini & Others v. UK (Appl. No. 55721/07), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 7 July 2011, p. 151

  • Chevrol v. France (Appl. No. 49636/99), Judgment (Second Section), 13 February 2003, p. 142

  • Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v. Turkey (Appl. No.40998/98), Judgment of 13 December 2007, p. 81

  • Jaloud v. The Netherlands (Appl. No. 47708/08), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 20 November 2014, p. 151

  • Kalinić and Bilbija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Appl. Nos. 45541/04 and 16587/07), Admissibility Decision (Fourth Section), 13 May 2008, p. 280

  • Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Appl. Nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 22 December 2009, ECHR 2009-VI, 273, pp. 282, 283

  • Šlaku v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Appl. No. 56666/12), Judgment (Fifth Section), 26 May 2016, p. 282

  • Zornić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Appl. No. 3681/06), Judgment (Fourth Section), 15 July 2014, pp. 282, 283

V Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)

  • A. K. and Others v. Sąd Najwyższy, Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18 [2019], ECLI:EU:C:2019:982, p. 273

  • Andrew Owusu v. N.B. Jackson, trading as ‘Villa Holidays Bal-Inn Villas’ (et al.), Case C-281/02 [2005] ECR I-01383, p. 151

  • Commission of the European Communities v. Hellenic Republic, Case C-120/94 [1994] ECR I-03037, p. 145

  • Council of the European Union v. Front populaire pour la libération de la saguia-el-hamra et du rio de oro (Front Polisario), Case C-104/16 P [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:973, p. 145

  • EEC Seed Crushers’ and Oil Processors’ Federation (FEDIOL) v. Commission of the European Communities, Case 191/82 [1983] ECR 2913, p. 145

  • European Commission and Others v. Yassin Abdullah Kadi, Joined Cases C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:518, p. 153

  • European Commission v. Republic of Poland, Case C-192/18 [2019], ECLI:EU:C:2019:924, p. 273

  • European Commission v. Republic of Poland, Case C-619/18 [2019], ECLI:EU:C:2019:531, p. 273

  • Fritz Werner Industrie-Ausrüstungen GmbH v. Federal Republic of Germany, Case C-70/94 [1995] ECR I-03189, p. 145

  • Germany v. Council, Case C-280/93 [1994] ECR I-04973, p. 156

  • International Fruit Company NV and others v. Produktschap voor Groenten en Fruit, Joined Cases C-21–24/72 [1972] ECR 01219, p. 156

  • Léon Van Parys NV v. Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau (BIRB), Case C-377/02 [2005] ECR I-01465, p. 156

  • Lothar Mattheus v. Doego Fruchtimport und Tiefkühlkost eG, Case 93/78 [1978] ECR 2203, p. 145

  • Parfums Dior and Assco Gerüste, Joined Cases C-300/98 and C-392/98 [2000] ECR I-11307, p. 156

  • Portugal v. Council, Case C-149/96 [1999] ECR I-08395, p. 156

  • Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV, Case C-284/16 [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:158, p. 156

  • Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P [2008] I-6351, p. 145

VI African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR)

  • Luke Munyandu Tembai and Benjamin John Freeth (represented by Norman Tjombe) v. Angola and Thirteen Others, Communication 409/12, p. 226

National Cases

I Bosnia and Herzegovina

Constitutional Court

  • Decision No. U 9/00, 3 November 2000, p. 281

  • Decision No. U 26/01, 28 September 2001, p. 281

  • Decision No. U 42/01, 26 March 2004, p. 282

  • Decision on Admissibility, U 5/04, 27 January 2006, p. 279

II Canada

Supreme Court

  • Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr [2010] 1 SCR 44, p. 143

  • Operation Dismantle [1985] 1 SCR 441, p. 143

  • Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 SCR 217, p. 365

III Columbia

Constitutional Court

  • Case C-358/96, p. 147

  • Case C-379/96, p. 147

  • Case SU-039/97, p. 73

  • Case C-252/19 (LAT-445), p. 147, 344

IV France

1 Conseil constitutionnel

  • Decision no. 70–39 DC, 19 June 1970 – Traité portant modification de certaines dispositions budgétaires […] et décision du Conseil des Communautés européennes […] relative au remplacement des contributions des États membres par des ressources propres aux Communautés, p. 169

  • Decision no. 74–54 DC, 15 January 1975 – Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Act, p. 164

  • Decision no. 76–71 DC, 30 December 1976 – Décision du Conseil des communautés européennes relatitve à l’élection de l’Assemblée des Communautés au suffrage universel direct, pp. 167, 168, 169

  • Decision no. 78–93 DC 29 April 1978 – Loi autorisant l’augmentation de la quote-part de la France au Fonds monétaire international, p. 175

  • Decision no. 85–188 DC, 22 May 1985 – Protocole n° 6 additionnel à la Convention Européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales concernant l’abolition de la peine de mort, signé par la France le 28 avril 1983, pp. 168, 175, 178

  • Decision no. 91–294 DC, 25 July 1991 – Loi autorisant l’approbation de la convention d’application de l’accord de Schengen, pp. 169, 178

  • Decision no. 92–308 DC, 9 April 1992 – Treaty on European Union (Maastricht I), pp. 169, 179

  • Decision no. 97–394 DC, 31 December 1997 – Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related instruments, p. 171

  • Decision no. 98–408 DC, 22 January 1999 – Treaty laying down the Statute of the International Criminal Court, pp. 175, 176

  • Decision no. 2004–505 DC, 19 November 2004 – Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, pp. 171, 172

  • Decision no. 2005–524/525 DC, 13 December 2005 – Engagements internationaux relatifs à l’abolition de la peine de mort, pp. 175, 178

  • Decision no. 2007–560 DC, 20 December 2007 – Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, p. 172

  • Decision no. 2012–653 DC, 9 August 2012 – Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union, p. 173

  • Decision no. 2017–749 DC, 31 July 2017 – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, pp. 173, 174, 178

2 Conseil d’État

  • No. 255905, 10 April 2003, p. 142

  • No. 292539, 17 April 2006, p. 142

  • No. 321470, 15 October 2008, p. 142

V Germany

1 Federal Constitutional Court

  • BVerfGE 4, 157 – Saarstatut, p. 142

  • BVerfGE 16, 27 – Iranische Botschaft, p. 81

  • BVerfGE 55, 349 – Hess, p. 218

  • BVerfGE 66, 39 – Nachrüstung, p. 142

  • BVerfGE 117, 141 – Immunität Argentiniens, p. 81

  • BVerfGE 123, 267 – Lissabon, p. 149

  • BVerfG, 19 May 2020, 1 BvR 2835/17 – BND, p. 136

2 Higher Administrative Court for North Rhine-Westphalia

  • Bin Ali Jaber v. Germany, Judgment, 19 March 2019, 4 A 1361/15, pp. 15, 130

VI Ghana

Supreme Court

  • Banful v. Attorney General and Another, (J1/7/2016) [2017] GHASC21 (22 June 2017), p. 348

VII Greece

Supreme Court

  • Areios Pagos, Prefecture of Voiotia v. Fed Republic of Germany, 11/2000, p. 153

VIII India

1 Supreme Court

  • Bommai v. Union of India [1994] 2 SCR 644, p. 143

  • Hans Muller of Nurenburg v. Superintendent, Presidency Jail, Calcutta, 1955 Indlaw SC 8, pp. 96, 97, 102

  • Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel v. Union of India, 1969 SCR (3) 254, p. 93

  • Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, 1978 Indlaw SC 212, p. 92

  • Marie-Emmanuelle v. Union of India, 2016 Indlaw SC 321, pp. 96, 97, 98

  • RC Poundyal v. Union of India, 1993 Indlaw SC 1362, p. 101

  • Re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves, 1959 Indlaw SC 294, pp. 103, 104

  • Rev. Mons. Monteiro v. State of Goa, 1969 Indlaw SC 583, pp. 99, 100

  • Rosiline George v. Union of India 1993 Indlaw SC 1535, p. 96

  • State of Gujarat v. Vora Fiddali Badruddin Mithibarwala, 1964 Indlaw SC 357, pp. 90, 95, 96, 102, 106

  • State of Rajasthan v. Union of India [1977] (3) SCC 5, p. 143

  • Vishaka. v. State of Rajasthan And Others, 1997 Indlaw SC 2304, pp. 92, 93

2 Dehli High Court

  • Lennox James Ellis v. Union of India, 2019 Indlaw Del 14, p. 98

IX Ireland

Supreme Court

  • Crotty v. An Taoiseach [1987] IR 713, Finlay CJ, 767, p. 149

X Israel

Supreme Court

  • Adala v. Commander of Central Command, HCJ 3799/02, p. 143

  • Baransa v. Commander of Central Command, HCJ, 554/81, p. 143

  • Hilman v. Minister of Internal Security, HCJ, 3123/99, p. 143

  • Ressler v. Minister of Defense, HCJ 910/86, p. 143

  • Segal v. Minister of Interior, HCJ 217/80, p. 143

  • Shiran v. Broadcasting Authority, HCJ 1/81, p. 143

XI Italy

1 Constitutional Court

  • 4 July 1963, decision No. 135/1963, p. 145

  • 15 June 1979, decision No. 54/1979, p. 145

  • 2 May 1985, decision No. 132/1985, p. 145

  • 8 April 1987, decision No. 128/1987, p. 145

  • 25 June 1996, decision No. 223/199,6 p. 145

  • 22 October 2014, decision No. 238/2014, pp. 13, 145, 153, 154, 155, 157, 158, 357

2 Administrative Supreme Court

  • 11 May 1966, No. 344, p. 142

  • 3 August 2000, No. 530, p. 142

  • 29 July 2008, No. 3992, p. 142

3 Supreme Court of Cassation

  • 5 June 2002, No. 8157 – Markovic, p. 142

  • 25 June 2019, No. 21995, p. 155

4 Tribunal of Rome

  • Società Fincantieri, 10 October 1991, p. 142

5 Tribunal of Florence

  • Simoncioni, Order 23 March 2015, p. 154

  • Simoncioni, No. 2469, 6 July 2015, p. 154

6 Tribunal of Ragusa

  • Barker e altri, 14 April 1984 (Pres. Ventura, Est. Firrincieli), p. 142

XII Netherlands

1 Supreme Court (Hoge Raad)

  • Urgenda, Case 19/00135, 20 December 2019, p. 146

2 The Hague Court of Appeal

  • Urgenda, Case 200.178.245/01, 9 October 2018, p. 146

3 The Hague District Court

  • Urgenda Foundation, case C/09/456689/HA ZA 13–1396, 24 June 2015, p. 146

XIII Russia

Constitutional Court

  • Chechnya judgment of 31 July 1995, p. 144

XIV Singapore

Supreme Court (sitting as Court of Appeal)

  • Swissbourgh Diamond Mining Company and Others v. the Kingdom of Lesotho, 27 November 2018, p. 223

XV South Africa

1 Constitutional Court

  • Kaunda and Others v. the President of the Republic of South Africa and Others 2005 (4) SA 235 (CC), pp. 144, 217, 218, 224

  • Law Society of South Africa and Others v. President of the Republic of South Africa and Others 2019 (3) BCLR 329 (CC), pp. 146, 147, 215, 219, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 358

  • Mohamed v. President of the Republic of South Africa 2001 (3) SA 893 (CC), pp. 219, 221, 237

  • President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v. South African Rugby Football Union and Others 2000 (1) SA 1 (CC), p. 219

  • The Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v. Louis Karel Fick and Others, Case CCT 101/12 [2013] (10) BCLR 1103 (CC), p. 228

  • The President of the Republic of South Africa and Another v. Hugo 1997 (4) SA 1 (CC), pp. 217, 219

  • Von Abo v. the President of the Republic of South Africa 2009 (5) SA 345 (CC), p. 219

2 Supreme Court of Appeal

  • Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v. Von Abo 2011 (5) SA 262 (SCA), pp. 219, 221

  • Minister of Justice and Others v. South African Litigation Centre and Others 2016 (3) SA 317 (SCA), p. 234

  • Van Zyl and Others v. the Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others 2008 (3) SA 294 (SCA), p. 222

3 High Court (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)

  • Democratic Alliance v. Minister of International Relations and Cooperation and Others 2017 (3) SA 212 (GP), pp. 55, 149, 215, 235, 236

  • Democratic Alliance v. Minister of International Relations and Co-operation and Others 2018 (6) SA 109 (GP), pp. 215, 231

  • Von Abo v. the Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others 2010 (3) SA 269 (T), p. 219

4 High Court (Trnsvaal Provincial Division)

  • Von Abo v. the Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others [2008] ZAGPHC 226, pp. 219, 220, 237

5 High Court (Western Cape Division, Cape Town)

  • Earthlife Africa v. Minister of Energy 2017 (5) SA 227, p. 237

XVI United Kingdom

1 Supreme Court

  • Belhaj & Rahmatullah (No 1) v. Straw & Ors [2017] UKSC 3, pp. 144, 152

  • HM Treasury v. Ahmed & others [2010] UKSC 2, p. 153

  • R (Miller) v. Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41, [2020] AC 373, p. 363

  • R (Miller) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [2018] AC 61, pp. 55, 148, 363

2 House of Lords

  • CCSU v. Minister for the Civil Service [1984] UKHL 9, p. 144

  • Lubbe [2000] 4 All ER 268 (UKHL), p. 152

  • R v. Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte [1998] 2 WLR 827 (HL 1999), p. 152

3 England and Wales Court of Appeals, Civil Division

  • Blackburn v. Attorney General [1971] 2 All ER 1380, p. 148

4 England and Wales High Court, Queen’s Bench Division

  • High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v. Prince Muffakham Jah, [2019] EWHC 2551 (Ch), p. 86

  • Hutchinson v. Newbury Magistrates Court [2000] EWHC QB 61, p. 142

5 Court of Chancery

  • Nabob of Arcot v. East India Company [1793] EngR 1368, (1792–1793) 2 Ves Jun 56, (1793) 30 ER 521, p. 80

XVII United States

1 Supreme Court

  • American Ins. Ass’n v. Garamendi, 539 US 396 (2003), p. 33

  • Aramco, 499 US 244 (1991), p. 151

  • Baker v. Carr 369 US 186 (1962), pp. 101, 102

  • Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 US 398 (1964), p. 150

  • Bond v. United States, 564 US 211 (2011), p. 144

  • Boumediene, 553 US 723 (2008), p. 143

  • Dames & Moore v. Regan, 453 US 654 (1981), p. 33

  • F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A., 542 US 155 (2004), p. 151

  • Goldwater v. Carter, 444 US 996 (1979), pp. 41, 148

  • Hamdan, 548 US 557 (2006), p. 143

  • Hamdi, 542 US 507 (2004), p. 143

  • Int’l Refugee Assistance Project, 582 US (2017), p. 145

  • Jam, 586 US (2019), p. 156

  • Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC, 584 US (2018), p. 151

  • Kiobel, 569 US 108 (2013), p. 151

  • Kirckpatrick & Co v. Environmental Tectonics Corp, 493 US 400 (1990), p. 150

  • Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 US 519 (2013), p. 136

  • Made in the USA Foundation v. United States, 242 F 3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 US 1039 (2001), pp. 34, 41

  • Medellín v. Texas, 552 US 491 (2008), pp. 155, 244

  • Missouri v. Holland, 252 US 416 (1929), p. 132

  • Morrison, 561 US 247 (2010), p. 151

  • Rasul, 542 US 466 (2004), p. 143

  • RJR Nabisco, 579 US (2016), p. 156

  • Sosa, 542 US 692 (2004), p. 151

  • Trump v. Hawaii, 585 US __, 138 S Ct 2392 (2018), pp. 145, 247

  • United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp, 299 US 304 (1936), p. 132

  • United States v. Guy W. Capps., Inc., 348 US 296 (1955), p. 33

  • Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952), p. 243

  • Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 566 US 189 (2012), p. 143

2 Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

  • Liu v. Siemens AG no 13-cv-4385, 2014 WL 3953672 (14 August 2014), p. 156

  • Vilar, 729 F.3d 62 (30 August 2013), pp. 145, 151

3 Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

  • Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech, Inc (Al Shimari IV), 840 F.3d 147, 151 (4th Cir. 2016), p. 143

  • Yousuf v. Samantar, 699 F.3d 763, 776–77 (4th Cir. 2012), p. 233

4 District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

  • Made in the USA Foundation, 56 F.Supp.2d 1226 (ND Ala 1999), p. 148

  • Russel Jackson, et al. v. The People’s Republic of China, 550 F. Supp. 869 (U.S. District Court, N. D. Ala. 1982), p. 322

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×