Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:11:50.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zooarchaeological Database Preservation, Multiscalar Data Integration, and the Collaboration of the Eastern Archaic Faunal Working Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Sarah W. Neusius*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, G-1 McElhaney Hall, 441 North Walk, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA
Bonnie W. Styles
Affiliation:
Illinois State Museum Research and Collections Center, 1011 East Ash St., Springfield, IL 62703, USA
Tanya M. Peres
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Florida State University, Innovation Park/Johnson Building, 2035 East Paul Dirac Dr., Suite 206, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA
Renee B. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Physical Science 131, SUNY-Oneonta, Oneonta, NY 13820, USA
George M. Crothers
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, 211 Lafferty Hall, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
Beverley A. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminal Justice, 526 French Hall, 303 East Kearsley St., University of Michigan, Flint, Michigan 48502, USA
Mona L. Colburn
Affiliation:
Illinois State Museum Research and Collections Center, 1011 East Ash St., Springfield, IL 62703, USA
*
(sraahneusius@gmail.com, corresponding author)

Abstract

Data preservation, reuse, and synthesis are important goals in contemporary archaeological research that have been addressed by the recent collaboration of the Eastern Archaic Faunal Working Group (EAFWG). We used the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR) to preserve 60 significant legacy faunal databases from 23 Archaic period archaeological sites located in several contiguous subregions of the interior North American Eastern Woodlands. In order to resolve the problem of synthesizing non-standardized databases, we used the ontology and integration tools available in tDAR to explore comparability and combine datasets so that our research questions about aquatic resource use during the Archaic could be addressed at multiple scales. The challenges of making digital databases accessible for reuse, including the addition of metadata, and of linking disparate data in queryable datasets are significant but worth the effort. Our experience provides one example of how collaborative research may productively resolve problems in making legacy data accessible and usable for synthetic archaeological research.

La preservación, reutilización y síntesis de datos son objetivos importantes en la investigación arqueológica contemporánea que se han abordado con la colaboración reciente del Grupo de Trabajo de la Fauna Arcaica del Este (Eastern Archaic Faunal Working Group, EAFWG). Utilizamos el Registro Arqueológico Digital (tDAR) para preservar 60 conjuntos de datos de fauna antiguos significativos de 23 sitios arqueológicos del período Arcaico ubicados en varias subregiones contiguas del interior de los bosques de América del Norte. Para resolver el problema de sintetizar los conjuntos de datos no estandarizados, utilizamos las herramientas de ontología e integración disponibles en el tDAR para explorar la comparabilidad y combinarlos para que nuestras preguntas de investigación sobre el uso de los recursos acuáticos durante el Arcaico se puedan abordar a múltiples escalas. Los retos de hacer accesibles las bases de datos digitales para su reutilización, de incluir la adición de metadatos y de vincular los datos dispares en conjuntos de datos consultables son significativos, pero vale la pena el esfuerzo. Nuestra experiencia proporciona un ejemplo de cómo la investigación en colaboración puede resolver problemas de manera productiva al hacer que los datos antiguos sean accesibles y utilizables para la investigación arqueológica sintética.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright 2019 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ahler, Steven A., and Styles, Bonnie W. 1998 A Summary of Changes in Archaic Period Subsistence and Site Function at Modoc Rock Shelter. Illinois Archaeology 10:110154.Google Scholar
Altschul, Jeffrey H., Kintigh, Keith W., Klein, Terry H., Doelle, William H., Hays-Gilpin, Kelley A., Herr, Sarah A., Kohler, Timothy A., Mills, Barbara J., Montgomery, Lindsay M., Nelson, Margaret C., Ortman, Scott G., Parker, John N., Peeples, Matthew A., and Sabloff, Jeremy A. 2017 Fostering Synthesis in Archaeology to Advance Science and Benefit Society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114:1099911002. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1715950114.Google Scholar
Altschul, Jeffrey H., Kintigh, Keith W., Klein, Terry H., Doelle, William H., Hays-Gilpin, Kelley A., Herr, Sarah A., Kohler, Timothy A., Mills, Barbara J., Montgomery, Lindsay M., Nelson, Margaret C., Ortman, Scott G., Parker, John N., Peeples, Matthew A., and Sabloff, Jeremy A. 2018 Fostering Collaborative Synthetic Research in Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6:1929. DOI:10.1017/aap.2017.31.Google Scholar
Anderson, Sue, and Boyle, Katherine (editors) 1997 Computing and Statistics in Osteoarchaeology: Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the Osteoarchaeological Research Group. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Armitage, P. L. 1978 A System for the Recording and Processing of Data Relating to Animal Remains from Archaeological Sites. In Research Problems in Zooarchaeology, edited by Brothwell, D. R., Thomas, K. D., and Clutton-Brock, Juliet, pp. 3945. Institute of Archaeology Publications Vol. 20, Occasional Publication No 3. Institute of Archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Beisaw, April 2013 Identifying and Interpreting Animal Bones: A Manual. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Bergman, Christopher, Peres, Tanya, and Schmidt, Christopher W. 2014 Scientific Recovery Investigations at the Kramer Mound (12Sp7): Prehistoric Artifact Assemblages, Faunal and Floral Remains, and Human Osteology. Indiana Archaeology 9:13101. Electronic document, http://www.in.gov/dnr/historic/files/hp-2014_archaeo_journal.pdf, accessed January 22, 2019.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis 1981 Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bocinsky, R. Kyle, Clark, Tiffany, and Spielmann, Katherine A. 2019 Compendium of R Code and Data for "‘The Southwestern Taphonomic Protocol." Electronic document, https://github.com/bocinsky/swtp/releases/tag/v0.1, accessed June 25, 2019.Google Scholar
Brown, James A., and Vierra, Robert K. 1983 What Happened in the Middle Archaic? Introduction to an Ecological Approach to Koster Site Archaeology. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by Phillips, James L. and Brown, James A., pp. 165195. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Chaplin, Raymond E. 1971 The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press, London.Google Scholar
Clark, Tiffany 2014a Evaluating Contextual Variability in Regional Faunal Studies. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress of Archaeozoologists, San Rafael, Argentina.Google Scholar
Clark, Tiffany 2014b A Faunal Taphonomic Protocol for the Southwestern US (tDAR id: 437822). DOI:10.6067/XCV8C82CVG, accessed January 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, Juliet 1975 A System for Retrieval of Data Relating to Animal Remains from Archaeological Sites. In Archaeozoological Studies, edited by Clason, A. T., pp. 2134. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Colburn, Mona L. 1985 Late Woodland Faunal Remains at Campbell Hollow. In Central Illinois Expressway Archeology: Upland Occupations of the Illinois Valley Crossing, edited by Stafford, Barbara D., pp. 121132. Technical Report Vol. 5. Kampsville Archeological Center, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Colburn, Mona L. 1986 Archaic Faunal Exploitation at Modoc Rock Shelter: Evidence from the Main Shelter Area. Report on file, Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Crothers, George M. 2005 Vertebrate Fauna from the Carlston Annis Site. In Archaeology of the Middle Green River Region, Kentucky, edited by Marquardt, William and Watson, Patty Jo, pp. 295314. Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies Monograph No. 5. Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Emery, Kitty F. 2004 In Search of the “Maya Diet”: Is Regional Comparison Possible in the Maya Tropics? Archaeofauna 14:3755.Google Scholar
Gifford, Diane P., and Crader, Diana C. 1977 A Computer Coding System for Archaeological Faunal Remains. American Antiquity 42:225238.Google Scholar
Hesse, Brian, and Wapnish, Paula 1985 Animal Bone Archeology: From Objectives to Analysis. Manuals on Archeology 5. Taraxacum, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hill, Frederick C. 1975 Effects of the Environment on Animal Exploitation by Archaic Inhabitants of the Koster Site, Illinois. PhD dissertation, Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Kansa, Sarah Witcher 2015 Using Linked Open Data to Improve Data Reuse in Zooarchaeology. Ethnobiology Letters 6:224231. DOI:10.14237/ebl.6.2.2015.467.Google Scholar
Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, and Kansa, Eric C. 2018 Data Beyond the Archive in Digital Archaeology: an Introduction to the Special Section. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6:8992. DOI:10.1017/aap.2018.7.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W. 2006 The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity 71:567578.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W. 2018 The Digital Archive of Huhugam Archaeology: Crowd Sourcing User Needs. Reports in Digital Archaeology No. 3. Center for Digital Antiquity, Arizona State University, Tempe. Electronic document, https://www.digitalantiquity.org/20180814-daha_user_needs_survey-rptsdigital-archaeol-3/, accessed May 23, 2019.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W., Altschul, Jeffrey H., Beaudry, Mary C., Drennan, Robert D., Kinzig, Ann P., Kohler, Timothy A., Frederick Limp, W., Maschner, Herbert D. G., Maschner, William K., Pauketat, Timothy R., Peregrine, Peter, Sabloff, Jeremy A., Wilkinson, Tony J., Wright, Henry T., and Zeder, Melinda A. 2014 Grand Challenges for Archaeology. American Antiquity 79:524.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W., Spielmann, Katherine A., Brin, Adam, Selçuk Candan, K., Clark, Tiffany C., and Peeples, Matthew 2017 Data Integration in the Service of Synthetic Research. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6:8992. DOI:10.1017/aap.2017.33.Google Scholar
Klein, Richard G., and Cruz-Uribe, Kathryn 1984 The Analysis of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Steven R. 2013 Faunal Analysis. In Archaic Occupations at White Bend: Helton, Falling Springs, and Hemphill Horizons, edited by Fishel, R. L., pp. 161168. Illinois State Archaeological Survey Research Report No. 29. Prairie Research Institute, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Steven R. 2016 Tree Row Faunal Assemblage. In The Tree Row Site: A Late Archaic Habitation and Mortuary Site in the Central Illinois Valley, edited by McElrath, Dale L. and Evans, Madeleine G., pp. 193214. Illinois State Archaeological Survey Research Report No. 38. Prairie Research Institute, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
Lake, Mark 2012 Open Archaeology. World Archaeology 44:471478.Google Scholar
LeFebvre, Michelle, Brenskelle, Laura, Wieczorek, John, Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, Kansa, Eric C., Wallis, Neill J., King, Jessica N., Emery, Kitty F., and Guralnick, Robert 2019 ZooArchNet: Connecting Zooarchaeological Specimens to the Biodiversity and Archaeology Data Networks. PloS ONE 14(4):e0215369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215369.Google Scholar
Lovis, William A., Donahue, Randolph E., and Holman, Margaret B. 2006 Long Distance Logistic Mobility as an Organizing Principle among Northern Hunter-Gatherers. American Antiquity 70:669693.Google Scholar
Lovis, William A., Egan, Katherine C., Smith, Beverley A., and William Monaghan, G. 2001 Wetlands and Emergent Horticultural Economies in the Upper Great Lakes: A New Perspective from the Schultz Site. American Antiquity 66:615632.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. Lee 1994 Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marquardt, William H., and Watson, Patty Jo (editors) 2005 Archaeology of the Middle Green River Region, Kentucky. Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies Monograph 5. Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., Kintigh, Keith W., Ellison, Leigh Ann, and Brin, Adam 2017 tDAR: A Cultural Heritage Archive for Twenty-First-Century Public Outreach, Research, and Resource Management. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5:238249. DOI:10:1017/aap.2017.18.Google Scholar
Neusius, Sarah W. 1982 Early–Middle Archaic Subsistence Strategies: Changes in Faunal Exploitation at the Koster Site. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Neusius, Sarah W. 1986 Generalized and Specialized Resource Utilization during the Archaic Period: Implications of the Koster Site Faunal Record. In Foraging, Collecting, and Harvesting: Archaic Period Subsistence and Settlement in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Neusius, Sarah W., pp. 117144. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Papers 6. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Terry 2000 The Archaeology of Animal Bones. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Parmalee, Paul 1969 The Riverton Culture: A Second Millennium Occupation in the Central Wabash Valley. Reports of Investigations No. 13. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Payne, Sebastian 1972 Partial Recovery and Sample Bias: The Results of Some Sieving Experiments. In Papers in Economic Prehistory, edited by Higgs, E. S., pp. 4964. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peres, Tanya, and Deter-Wolf, Aaron 2016 The Shell-Bearing Archaic in the Middle Cumberland River Valley. Southeastern Archaeology 35:237250.Google Scholar
Peres, Tanya M., Deter-Wolf, Aaron, Keasler, Joey, and Hodge, Shannon Chappell 2016 Faunal Remains from an Archaic Period Cave in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 8:187199. DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.010.Google Scholar
Peres, Tanya, Deter-Wolf, Aaron, and Myers, Gage A. 2012 Zooarchaeological Analysis of a Multicomponent Shell-Bearing Site in Davidson County, Tennessee. Tennessee Archaeology 6:4052.Google Scholar
Peres, Tanya M., Walker, Renee B., and Crothers, George M. 2017 Archaic Aquatic Resource Use in the Eastern Woodlands: An Examination of Social Causes and Environmental Variation. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Purdue, James R. 1982 The Environmental Implications of the Fauna Recovered from Rodgers Shelter. In Holocene Adaptations with the Lower Pomme de Terre River Valley, Missouri, edited by Kay, Marvin, pp. 199261. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Raber, Paul, Miller, Patricia, and Neusius, Sarah W. (editors) 1998 The Archaic in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.Google Scholar
Reitz, Elizabeth J., and Wing, Elizabeth S. 2008 Zooarchaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Brian S., and Baker, Barry W. 1992 A Vertebrate Faunal Analysis Coding System with North American Taxonomy and Dbase Support Programs and Procedures (Version 3.3.). University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Technical Report 23. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Brian S., and Sanchez, Julia L. J. 1994 Comparison of " and ¼" Mesh Recovery of Controlled Samples of Small-to-Medium-Sized Mammals. American Antiquity 59:525530.Google Scholar
Smith, Beverley A. 1989 Analysis of Faunal Remains from the Weber I Site. In Archaeological Investigations of the Weber I and Weber II Sites, Frankenmuth Township, Saginaw County, Michigan, edited by Lovis, W. A., pp. 143175. Michigan Cultural Resource Investigations Series Vol. 1. University of Michigan, Lansing.Google Scholar
Smith, Beverley A. 1994 Faunal Analysis (20SA1043). In 1991 Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership Pipeline Expansion Projects: Michigan, Phase III Investigations at the Shiawassee River (20SA1033) and Bear Creek Sites (20SA1043), edited by Branstner, Mark C. and Hambacher, Michael J., pp. 237267. Great Lakes Research Associates, Williamston, Michigan.Google Scholar
Smith, Beverley A. 2002 Analysis of the Faunal Assemblage from Sites 20BY28 and 20BY387. In A Bridge to the Past: The Post Nipissing Archaeology of the Marquette Viaduct Replacement Project Sites 20BY28 and 20BY387, Bay City, Michigan, edited by Lovis, W. A., pp. 5-15-20. Museum and Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Smith, Beverley A., and Egan, Kathryn C. 1990 Middle and Late Archaic Faunal and Floral Exploitation at the Weber I Site (20SA581), Michigan. Ontario Archaeology 50:3954.Google Scholar
Smith, Beverley A., Styles, Bonnie W., Neusius, Sarah, Kuehn, Steven R., and Colburn, Mona 2017 Exploring the Effects of Stabilizing Riverine and Lacustrine Environments on Archaic Faunal Exploitation in the Midwest and Great Lakes Regions. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Snow, Dean R., Gahegan, Mark, Lee Giles, C., Hirth, Kenneth G., Milner, George R., Mitra, Prasenjit, and Wang, James Z. 2006 Cybertools and Archaeology. Science 311:958959.Google Scholar
Sobotkova, Adela 2018 Sociotechnical Obstacles to Archaeological Data Reuse. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6:117124. DOI:10.1017/aap.2017.37.Google Scholar
Spielmann, Katherine A., and Kintigh, Keith W. 2011 The Digital Archaeological Record: the Potentials of Archaeozoological Data Integration through tDAR. SAA Archaeological Record 11(1):2225.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W. 1978 Faunal Exploitation and Energy Expenditure: Early Late Woodland Subsistence in the Lower Illinois River Valley. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W. 1981 Faunal Exploitation and Resource Selection: Early Late Woodland Subsistence in the Lower Illinois River Valley. Scientific Papers 3. Northwestern University Archaeological Program, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W. 1986 Aquatic Exploitation in the Lower Illinois River Valley: The Role of Paleoecological Change. In Foraging, Collecting and Harvesting: Archaic Period Subsistence and Settlement in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Neusius, Sarah W., pp. 145174. Occasional Papers 6. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W. 2011 Animal Use by Holocene Aboriginal Societies of the Northeast. In The Subsistence Economies of Indigenous North American Societies, edited by Smith, Bruce D., pp. 449481. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W., Ahler, Steven R., and Fowler, Melvin L. 1983 Modoc Rock Shelter Revisited. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by Phillips, James L. and Brown, James A., pp. 261297. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W., and Colburn, Mona 2019 Taphonomic, Environmental, and Cultural Influences on Archaic Faunal Assemblages at Modoc Rock Shelter, Illinois, USA. Quaternary International, in press. DOI:10.1016/j.quaint.2019.03.015.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W., Colburn, Mona, and Neusius, Sarah W. 2016 Exploring Comparability and Variability of Eastern Archaic tDAR Faunal Databases and Human Use of Animals. Paper presented at the Midwest Archaeological Conference, Iowa City, Iowa.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W., Colburn, Mona, and Neusius, Sarah W. 2017 Exploring Comparability of Archaic Period Faunal Datasets for the Interior Eastern United States. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Styles, Bonnie W., and Bruce McMillan, R. 2009 Archaic Faunal exploitation in the Prairie Peninsula and Surrounding Regions of the Midcontinent. In Archaic Societies: Diversity and Complexity Across the Midcontinent, edited by Emerson, Thomas E., McElrath, Dale L., and Fortier, Andrew, pp. 3980. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
Walker, Renee B. 1998 The Late Paleoindian through Middle Archaic Faunal Evidence from Dust Cave, Alabama. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Walker, Renee B. 2000 Subsistence Strategies at Dust Cave: Changes from the Late Paleoindian through Middle Archaic Occupations. Office of Archaeological Services Report of Investigations No. 78. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Walker, Renee, and Parmalee, Paul W. 2004 A Noteworthy Cache of Goose Humeri from Late Paleoindian Levels at Dust Cave, Northwestern Alabama. Journal of Alabama Archaeology 50:1835.Google Scholar