Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T15:05:26.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urban Regeneration under National Land Use Control: Guangdong's “Three-Old” Redevelopment Programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2023

Zhi Liu ,
Zhiji Huang ,
Zihan Yin  and
Lixin Zhang
Zhi Liu
Affiliation:
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Peking University, Beijing, China
Zhiji Huang*
Affiliation:
School of Government, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China
Zihan Yin
Affiliation:
School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China
Lixin Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
*
Corresponding author: Zhiji Huang, email: huangzhiji@cufe.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2009, Guangdong province initiated a programme of regenerating its blighted urban neighbourhoods, outdated industrial plants and dilapidated villages (also known as “three-old redevelopment”), which continues today. While the academic attention focuses mainly on the city and project levels, few studies give a full and up-to-date account of the overall programme. This paper documents the background, purpose, scope, policy framework, project types, implementation modalities and initial outcomes of the programme. Unlike most urban regeneration projects around the world, the Guangdong programme – the largest coordinated effort in the global history of urban regeneration – is primarily driven not by the potential increases of land value but by an urgent need to find solutions to the conflict between the local demand for urban land and the rigid national land use control. The expected land value increases are harnessed to attract the participation of market players at the project level. The Guangdong experience opens up a new way for urban spatial development in China, especially at a time when China further strengthens national land use control under the newly established national territorial planning system.

摘要

摘要

2009年，广东省在全省范围内开展旧城镇、旧厂房、旧村庄改造（简称 “三旧” 改造）工作，并一直持续至今。现有学术文献主要关注城市和项目尺度的研究，很少聚焦整个省“三旧”改造工作的讨论。为了弥补这一不足，本文全面研究 “三旧” 改造工作的背景、目标、范围、政策框架、项目类型、改造模式和初步成效。广东省 “三旧” 改造作为迄今为止历史上最大规模的城市更新尝试，与世界上大多数城市更新项目不同点在于其并非由土地增值所驱动，而是为了解决地方城市土地需求与严格的国家土地用途管制之间日益尖锐的矛盾。土地增值被用于激发市场主体参与 “三旧” 改造项目。在中国构建新的国土空间规划体系的背景下，国家土地用途管制将进一步加强。而广东省的 “三旧” 改造实践经验为中国城市空间发展开拓出了一条新路。

Keywords

three-old redevelopmenturban regenerationnational land use controlurban villagesZhujiang (Pearl River) DeltaGuangdong province三旧改造城市更新国家土地用途管制城中村珠三角地区广东省
Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 258 , June 2024 , pp. 441 - 456
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandurski, David. 2016. Dragons in Diamond Village: Tales of Resistance from Urbanizing China. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Bui, Tung X., Yang, David C., Jones, Wayne D. and Li, Joanna Z. (ed.). 2003. China's Economic Powerhouse: Economic Reform in Guangdong Province. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Yu, Zhang, Xiaoling, Zhang, Xukun and Li, Heng. 2020. “The incremental construction land differentiated management framework: the perspective of land quota trading in China.” Land Use Policy 96, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Yueer, Tong, De and Chu, Jun. 2022. “Involuntary resettlement outcomes following the regeneration of informal communities: the case of Baishizhou urbanizing village in Shenzhen, China.” Population, Space and Place 29 (2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Li, and Tian, Chuanho. 2019. “Construction land quotas as a tool for managing urban expansion.” Landscape and Urban Planning 195, 103727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Shenjin. 2019. “Three waves of state-led gentrification in China.” Journal of Human and Urban Geography 110 (1), 26–34.Google Scholar
He, Shenjin, and Wu, Fulong. 2009. “China's emerging neoliberal urbanism: perspectives from urban redevelopment.” Antipode 41 (2), 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yani, and Tang, Bosin. 2016. “Institutional barriers to redevelopment of urban villages in China: a transaction cost perspective.” Land Use Policy 58, 482–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yani, and Zhang, Xiaoling. 2016. “Redevelopment of industrial sites in the Chinese ‘villages in the city’: an empirical study of Shenzhen.” Journal of Cleaner Production 134 (A), 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Xun, Hui, Eddie C. M., Chen, Tingting, Lang, Wei and Guo, Youliang. 2019. “From Habitat III to the new urbanization agenda in China: seeing through the practices of the ‘three old renewals’ in Guangzhou.” Land Use Policy 81, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Xiaowei, Yuan, Qifeng, Tan, Xiaohong and Li, Zhigang. 2018. “Territorialization of urban villages in China: the case of Guangzhou.” Habitat International 78, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, George Chusheng. 1997. Red Capitalism in Southern China: Growth and Development of the Pearl River Delta. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Lin, George Chusheng. 2015. “The redevelopment of China's construction land: practicing land property rights in cities through renewals.” The China Quarterly 224, 865–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yanliu, Hao, Pu and Geertman, Stan. 2015. “A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese ‘villages in the city’.” Urban Studies 52 (10), 1774–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ying, Tang, Shuangshuang, Geertman, Stan, Lin, Yanliu and van Oort, Frank. 2017. “The chain effects of property-led redevelopment in Shenzhen: price-shadowing and indirect displacement.” Cities 67, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Peter, Sykes, Hugh and Granger, Rachel. 2017. Urban Regeneration. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoon, Sonia. 2014. “Three olds: experimental urban restructuring with Chinese characteristics, Guangzhou and Shenzhen in comparison.” In Altrock, Uwe and Schoon, Sonia (eds.), Maturing Megacities: The Pearl River Delta in Progressive Transformation. Dordrecht: Springer, 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Hyun Bang. 2009. “Residential redevelopment and the entrepreneurial local state: the implications of Beijing's shifting emphasis on urban redevelopment policies.” Urban Studies 46 (13), 2815–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Ezra. 1987. One Step Ahead in China: Guangdong under Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Da Wei David. 2015. Urban Villages in the New China: Case of Shenzhen. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wu, Fulong, Zhang, Fangzhu and Webster, Chris. 2013. “Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area.” Urban Studies 50 (10), 1919–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, Lin. 2011. “Urban regeneration in China: policy, development, and issues.” Local Economy 26 (5), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, Lin. 2013. “Urban transformation, and institutional policies: case study of mega-region development in China's Pearl River Delta.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 139(4), 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, Lin. 2014. “Examining China's urban redevelopment: land types, targeted policies, and public participation.” In Altrock, Uwe and Schoon, Sonia (eds.), Maturing Megacities: The Pearl River Delta in Progressive Transformation. Dordrecht: Springer, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Taiyang, Qian, Zhu, Huang, Xianjin, Zhao, Yuntai, Zhou, Yan and Zhao, Zehui. 2018. “Impact of the top-down quota-oriented farmland preservation planning on the change of urban land-use intensity in China.” Habitat International 77, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Daming. 2021. Revisiting China's Rural Urbanization: A Pearl River Delta Region Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar