Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:32:31.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel and Phenomenology: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Dermot Moran  and
Elisa Magrì
Dermot Moran
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Irelanddermot.moran@ucd.ie
Elisa Magrì
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Irelanddermot.moran@ucd.ie
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baugh, B. (2014), French Hegel: From Surrealism to Postmodernism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentano, F. (1968), Die vier Phasen der Philosophie und ihr augenblicklicher Status (first published 1895, then Leipzig: Meiner, 1926, reprinted Hamburg: Meiner, 1968), trans. S. Satris, ‘The Four Phases of Philosophy and its Present Condition’, Philosophy Today 43:1/4 (Spring 1999), 14–28.Google Scholar
Bruzina, R. (2004), Edmund Husserl and Eugen Fink. Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology 1928–1938. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (1848–9), ‘Hegel en France’, Revue d’Histoire et de Philosophie. Religieuses 28–9: 282–297.Google Scholar
Denker, A. (2003), ‘In the Spirit of Hegel’s Phenomenology: Heidegger and Fink’, in A. Denker and M. Vater (eds.), Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: New Critical Essays. New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Fabbianelli, F. and Luft, S. (eds.) (2014), Husserl und die Klassische Deutsche Philosophie. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, E. (1995), Sixth Cartesian Meditation. The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method with Textual Annotations by Edmund Husserl , trans. R. Bruzina. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1969), Identity and Difference, trans. J. Stambaugh New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1997), Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes (Wintersemester 1930/31), ed. I. Görland, (Gesamtausgabe Band 32, 3rd edn.), trans. P. Emad and K. Maly, Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1975), Logische Untersuchungen I. Husserliana XVIII: The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1994), Briefwechsel, ed. K. Schuhmann in collaboration with E. Schuhmann, Husserliana Dokumente, Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kruks, S. (1976), ‘Merleau-Ponty, Hegel, and the Dialectic’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 7:2: 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landgrebe, L. (1972), ‘The Problem of the Beginning of Philosophy in Husserl’s Phenomenology’, in L. Embree (ed.), Life-World and Consciousness. Essays for Aron Gurwitsch. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (1993), Max Weber and Karl Marx. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (1941), Von Hegel zu Nietzsche: Der revolutionäre Bruch im Denken des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Luft, S. (2002), “Phänomenologie der Phänomenologie”. Systematik und Methodologie der Phänomenologie in der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Husserl und Fink. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manca, D., Magrì, E. and Ferrarin, A. (eds.) (2015), Hegel e la fenomenologia transcendentale. Ets: Pisa.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1928), ‘Beiträge zu einer Phänomenologie des Historischen Materialismus’, Philosophische Hefte 1:1928: 45–68.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1932), Hegels Ontologie und die Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. [1954–55] (2010), Institution and Passivity. Course Notes from de Collège de France, trans. L. Lawlor and H. Massey. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Russon, J. (2010), ‘Dialectic, Difference, and the Other: The Hegelianizing of French Phenomenology’, in L. Lawlor (ed.), Phenomenology. Responses and Developments. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Stone, A. ( forthcoming), ‘Hegel and Twentieth-Century French Philosophy’, in D. Moyar (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, R. (2003), Heidegger’s Children: Hannah Arendt, Karl Löwith , Hans Jonas, and Herbert Marcuse. Princeton NJ: Princeton U. P.Google Scholar