Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:39:55.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Back to the future? What we can learn from the 2nd generation of Social Policy academics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2022

TINA HAUX Open the ORCID record for TINA HAUX [Opens in a new window]
TINA HAUX*
Affiliation:
The National Centre for Social Research e-mail: Tina.Haux@ncatcen.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Topics such as climate change, diversity and inequality are likely to dominate the future of Social Policy. This is also a time of a generational change in Social Policy.

In this paper I will address the questions of the future challenges for Social Policy by mapping the trajectories of the second generation of Social Policy Academics. There is much to learn from this generation such as the importance of epistemic communities, of mentoring and sustained engagement with policy-makers. However, the argument put forward in this paper is that Social Policy as it developed into an academic subject from the 1960s lost the connection to policy-makers due to expanding outside London; focusing on establishing social policy as an academic subject, academic careers and moving into comparative Social Policy. One effect of this is that an explicit focus on policy innovation and design has gone missing. Instead, this space in the policy landscape has been claimed by think tanks that continue to be highly successful in influencing government policy. A re-discovery of policy design as a key part of Social Policy together with the other lessons from this generation will be needed if we want to tackle the big challenges of tomorrow.

Keywords

Social PolicyTitmusImpact
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 472 - 486
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel-Smith, B. (1973), ‘Obituary: Richard Titmuss’, Journal of Social Policy, 2,3, i – ii. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/richard-morris-titmuss/58DE5CB0691433AF90F1551800303EC9 [Accessed 15.04.2022].Google Scholar
Alcock, P. (2003), ‘The Subject of Social Policy’, in The Student’s Companion to Social Policy, Alcock, P., Erskine, A. and May, M. (eds.), Social Policy Association, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Alcock, P., Glennerster, H., Oakley, A. and Sinfield, A. (2001), Welfare and Well-being: Richard Titmuss’ Contribution to Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arshed, N. (2017), ‘The origins of policy ideas: The importance of think tanks in the enterprise policy process in the UK’, Journal of business research, 71, 74–83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296316306087#:~:text=Interviews%20with%20representatives%20from%20eight,policy%20ideas%20as%20a%20possible [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S.J. and Exley, S. (2010), ‘Making policy with ‘good ideas’: Policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of New Labour, Journal of education policy, 25, 2, 151–169. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02680930903486125 [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P. and Tinkler, J. (2014), The impact of the social sciences: How academics and their research make a difference. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, M., Lewis, J. and Piachaud, D. (eds) (1989), Social Policy: Subject or object, in The Goals of Social Policy, 3-24. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cairney, P. (2016), The politics of evidence-based policy making. Springer.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1995), LSE: A History of the London School of Economics and Political Science 1895–1995, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, B. (2007), Global Social Policy & Governance, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Denham, A. and Garnett, M. (1996), ‘The nature and impact of think tanks in contemporary Britain’, in Contemporary British History, 10, 1, 43–61. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13619469608581367 [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnison, D. (1979), ‘Social policy since Titmuss’, Journal of Social Policy, 8, 2, 145–156. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/abs/social-policy-since-titmuss/94A89011BBC7722E6F08CCE144436BBD [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exley, S. (2019), ‘Social administration revisited: Traditions of observational fieldwork and their value’, Social Policy & Administration, 53, 1, 49–62. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/spol.12411 [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennerster, H. (1988), ‘A requiem for the Social Administration Association’, Journal of Social Policy, 17, 1, 83–84. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/requiem-for-the-social-administration-association/EBD842A08B7C36461D60E260E5A24BFE [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennerster, H. (2009), ‘Social Policy: Now and Then – A Response’, Social Policy & Administration, 4317, 750–753. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/26627/ [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennerster, H. (2014), Richard Titmuss: forty years on. LSE, London: CASE paper no. 180. https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/casepaper180.pdf [Accessed 15.04.2022].Google Scholar
Global Social Policy (2001), Editorial, Vol. 1, Cambridge: CUP. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/146801810100100101 [Accessed 15.04.2022].Google Scholar
Halsey, A.H. (2004), A history of sociology in Britain: science, literature, and society, Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haux, T. (2019), Dimensions of Impact in the Social Sciences: The Case of Social Policy, Sociology and Political Science Research, Policy Press, 148 pp. ISBN 978-1-4473-2408-9.Google Scholar
Journal of Social Policy (1972), Editorial Policy, Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. (2021), Talking about a revolution? Blog. https://gavinkellyblog.com/talking-about-a-revolution-4c2eab6224ec [Accessed 15.04.2022].Google Scholar
Mishra, R. (1989), The academic tradition in Social Poloicy: The Titmuss years, in M. Lewis, Bulmer, J. and Piachaud, D. (eds.), The Goals of Social Policy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (2014), Father and daughter: Patriarchy, gender and social science. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. (2010) ‘The Changing Face of Social Administration’, Social Policy & Administration, 44, 13, 326–342. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00716.x [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pautz, H. (2020), Think Tanks and Policymaking, in Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics. [Accessed 03.02.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkin, H. (2007), History of universities. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 159-205). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Powell, M. (2006), ‘Social Policy & Administration: Journal and Discipline’, Social Policy & Administration, 40, 3, 233–249. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00487.x [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafter, N. (2012), ‘Origins of Criminology’, in Bosworth, M. and Hoyle, C. (eds.), What is criminology?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9, 143-156.Google Scholar
REF2014 (2021) REF impact case studies [Accessed 03.02.2022].Google Scholar
Rose, H. (1981), ‘Rereading Titmuss: the sexual division of welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 10, 4, 477–501. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/abs/rereading-titmuss-the-sexual-division-of-welfare/981E4F7B15AA6EEAE2C05066B316D4D6 [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheard, S. (2014), The Passionate Economist. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2010), ‘Research, Policy and Funding- Academic treadmills and the squeeze on intellectual spaces’, British Journal of Sociology, 61,1, 176-195.Google Scholar
Smith, K. E. and Stewart, E. (2017), ‘We need to talk about impact: why social policy academics need to engage with the UK’s research impact agenda’, Journal of Social Policy, 46,1, 109-127. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01307.x [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, T. (2019), Why we need a bold new vision of government, NESTA. https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/why-we-need-bold-new-vision-government/ [Accessed 15.04.2022].Google Scholar
Talbot, C. and Talbot, C. (2019), Opinion: Is public policy trapped in think tanks? Civil Service World, 13th of August 2019. https://www.civilserviceworld.com/news/article/opinion-is-public-policy-trapped-in-think-tanks [Accessed 15.04.2022].Google Scholar
Taylor, D. (2020), ‘Critical Social Policy on its 40th Anniversary’, Critical Social Policy, 40, 1, 3–6. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0261018319889837 [Accessed 15.04.2022].Google Scholar
Timmins, N. (1995), The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State, London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Welshman, J. (2004), ‘The Unknown Titmuss’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 2, 225–247. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/abs/unknown-titmuss/68DA7DC97DE1B3E4176CEF0AE17AEEB8 [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilding, P. (2009), ‘Social Policy: Now and Then’, Social Policy & Administration, 43, 7, 736–749. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00692.x [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (2016), ‘Critical thinking in social policy: The challenges of past, present and future’, Social Policy & Administration, 50, 6, 628–664. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/spol.12253 [Accessed 15.04.2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar