Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:22:40.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paleohistological inferences of thermometabolic regimes in Notosuchia (Pseudosuchia: Crocodylomorpha) revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2022

Jorge Cubo*
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie—Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Paris, France. E-mail: jorge.cubo_garcia@sorbonne-universite.fr, paul.aubier@gmail.com, faurebrac.mathieu@gmail.com, gaspard.martet@gmail.com, romain.pellarin74@gmail.com, idriss.pelletan@laposte.net
Paul Aubier
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie—Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Paris, France. E-mail: jorge.cubo_garcia@sorbonne-universite.fr, paul.aubier@gmail.com, faurebrac.mathieu@gmail.com, gaspard.martet@gmail.com, romain.pellarin74@gmail.com, idriss.pelletan@laposte.net
Mathieu G. Faure-Brac
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie—Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Paris, France. E-mail: jorge.cubo_garcia@sorbonne-universite.fr, paul.aubier@gmail.com, faurebrac.mathieu@gmail.com, gaspard.martet@gmail.com, romain.pellarin74@gmail.com, idriss.pelletan@laposte.net
Gaspard Martet
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie—Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Paris, France. E-mail: jorge.cubo_garcia@sorbonne-universite.fr, paul.aubier@gmail.com, faurebrac.mathieu@gmail.com, gaspard.martet@gmail.com, romain.pellarin74@gmail.com, idriss.pelletan@laposte.net
Romain Pellarin
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie—Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Paris, France. E-mail: jorge.cubo_garcia@sorbonne-universite.fr, paul.aubier@gmail.com, faurebrac.mathieu@gmail.com, gaspard.martet@gmail.com, romain.pellarin74@gmail.com, idriss.pelletan@laposte.net
Idriss Pelletan
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie—Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Paris, France. E-mail: jorge.cubo_garcia@sorbonne-universite.fr, paul.aubier@gmail.com, faurebrac.mathieu@gmail.com, gaspard.martet@gmail.com, romain.pellarin74@gmail.com, idriss.pelletan@laposte.net
Mariana V. A. Sena
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie—Paris (CR2P, UMR 7207), Paris, France; and Laboratório de Paleontologia da URCA-LPU, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Regional do Cariri, Rua Carolino Sucupira–Pimenta, Crato, Ceará 63105-010, Brazil. E-mail: mari.araujo.sena@gmail.com
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Notosuchia is a group of mostly terrestrial crocodyliforms. The presence of a prominent crest overhanging the acetabulum, slender straight-shafted long bones with muscular insertions close to the joints, and a stable knee joint suggests that they had an erect posture. This stance has been proposed to be linked to endothermy, because it is present in mammals and birds and contributes to the efficiency of their respiratory systems. However, a bone paleohistological study unexpectedly suggested that Notosuchia were ectothermic organisms. The thermophysiological status of Notosuchia deserves further analysis, because the methodology of the previous study can be improved. First, it was based on a relationship between red blood cell size and bone vascular canal diameter tested using 14 extant tetrapod species. Here we present evidence for this relationship using a more comprehensive sample of extant tetrapods (31 species). Moreover, contrary to previous results, bone cross-sectional area appears to be a significant explanatory variable (in addition to vascular canal diameter). Second, red blood cell size estimations were performed using phylogenetic eigenvector maps, and this method excludes a fraction of the phylogenetic information. This is because it generates a high number of eigenvectors requiring a selection procedure to compile a subset of them to avoid model overfitting. Here we inferred the thermophysiology of Notosuchia using phylogenetic logistic regressions, a method that overcomes this problem by including all of the phylogenetic information and a sample of 46 tetrapods. These analyses suggest that Araripesuchus wegeneri, Armadillosuchus arrudai, Baurusuchus sp., Iberosuchus macrodon, and Stratiotosuchus maxhechti were ectothermic organisms.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Introduction

Notosuchia is a group of extinct, mostly terrestrial crocodyliforms. The presence of several morphological features suggests that they had an erect posture: the prominent crest overhanging the acetabulum observed in Chimaerasuchus paradoxus (Wu and Sues Reference Wu and Sues1996), Notosuchus terrestris (Pol Reference Pol2005), Araripesuchus tsangatsangana (Turner Reference Turner2006), Baurusuchus albertoi (Nascimento and Zaher Reference Nascimento and Zaher2010), and Stratiotosuchus maxhechti (Riff and Kellner Reference Riff and Kellner2011); the straight-shafted long bones described in Anatosuchus minor and Araripesuchus spp. (Sereno and Larsson Reference Sereno and Larsson2009); the slender limb bones with muscular insertions close to the joints reported in Malawisuchus mwakasyungutiensis (Gomani Reference Gomani1997); and the tight/stable knee joint shown in Pissarrachampsa sera (Godoy et al. Reference Godoy, Bronzati, Eltink, Marsola, Cidade, Langer and Montefeltro2016). Among extant tetrapods, only endotherms (mammals and birds) show an upright stance. This last feature has been proposed to be linked to endothermy, because it contributes to the efficiency of the respiratory system (Carrier Reference Carrier1987). Thus, according to this morphological evidence, we can reasonably hypothesize that Notosuchia were endothermic. However, Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020) concluded that they were primitively ectothermic using two proxies: resting metabolic rate (RMR) and red blood cell size (RBCsize).

RMR is the minimal consumption of oxygen over time per unit of body mass measured under postabsorptive conditions during the period of normal activity of the daily cycle in resting, nonreproductive specimens (Andrews and Pough Reference Andrews and Pough1985; Montes et al. Reference Montes, Le Roy, Perret, de Buffrénil, Castanet and Cubo2007). RMRs of extant endotherms are at least one order of magnitude higher than those of extant ectotherms of similar body mass, because the mechanisms of thermogenesis operating in the former are costly in terms of energy (Clarke and Pörtner Reference Clarke and Pörtner2010; Legendre and Davesne Reference Legendre and Davesne2020). RMRs inferred by Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020) for Notosuchia were significantly lower than the threshold separating ectotherms from endotherms.

Within extant tetrapods, RBCsize is lower in endotherms (mammals and birds) than in ectotherms (Amphibia, Squamata, Testudines, and Crocodylia) (Hartman and Lessler Reference Hartman and Lessler1964; Snyder and Sheafor Reference Snyder and Sheafor1999; Soslau Reference Soslau2020). It has been suggested that the acquisition of lungs together with the subsequent evolution of the cardiovascular system was the driving force explaining the evolution of vertebrate RBCsize (Snyder and Sheafor Reference Snyder and Sheafor1999). In endotherms, thermogenetic mechanisms use a huge amount of oxygen, producing high RMRs. Considering that “Smaller capillaries [and smaller RBCs] are associated with increased potential for diffusive gas exchange” (Snyder and Sheafor Reference Snyder and Sheafor1999: 189), these features may have been positively selected in endotherms. Huttenlocker and Farmer (Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017) found that RBCsize values are related to, and can be inferred from, bone vascular canal diameter. Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020) inferred notosuchian RBCsize values using this last relationship and concluded that they were significantly higher than the threshold separating ectotherms from endotherms.

To sum up, both proxies (RMR and RBCsize) suggest that Notosuchia were ectothermic organisms. Considering that paleohistological evidence (suggesting low RMR, large RBCsize, and ectothermy) is not congruent with morphological evidence (suggesting an erect posture, cursoriality, and endothermy), the thermophysiological status (i.e., either ectothermic or endothermic) of Notosuchia deserves further analysis.

The approach used by Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020) to perform these inferences can be improved in two ways. First, notosuchian thermophysiological status inferred using RBCsize is based on the quoted relationship between RBCsize and bone vascular canal diameter (Cubo et al. Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020). This relationship was tested by Huttenlocker and Farmer (Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017) using a rather small sample size (14 extant tetrapod species). Here we tested this relationship using a more comprehensive sample of extant tetrapods (31 species) and phylogenetic generalized least-squares regression (PGLS). Second, RBCsize estimations were performed using phylogenetic eigenvector maps (PEMs), and this method excludes a fraction of phylogenetic information. This is because PEM generates a high number of eigenvectors (n − 1, with n being the number of terminal taxa analyzed), thus requiring a selection procedure to compile a subset of eigenvectors to avoid model overfitting (Guénard et al. Reference Guénard, Legendre and Peres-Neto2013; Legendre et al. Reference Legendre, Guénard, Botha-Brink and Cubo2016). Here we inferred the thermophysiology of Notosuchia using phylogenetic logistic regression (PLR) (Ives and Garland Reference Ives and Garland2010; Tung Ho and Ané Reference Tung Ho and Ané2014), a method that overcomes this problem, because it includes all (instead of a fraction) of the phylogenetic information.

Material and Methods

Phylogenies in Figure 1 and Supplementary File 1 contain the tetrapod samples used in this study. Topologies were taken from Pyron and Wiens (Reference Pyron and Wiens2011) for amphibians; Meredith et al. (Reference Meredith, Janečka, Gatesy, Ryder, Fisher, Teeling, Goodbla, Eizirik, Simão, Stadler, Rabosky, Honeycutt, Flynn, Ingram, Steiner, Williams, Robinson, Burk-Herrick, Westerman, Ayoub, Springer and Murphy2011), Zurano et al. (Reference Zurano, Magalhães, Asato, Silva, Bidau, Mesquita and Costa2019), Kumar et al. (Reference Kumar, Hallström and Janke2013), and Upham et al. (Reference Upham, Esselstyn and Jetz2019) for mammals; Ast (Reference Ast2001) and Villa et al. (Reference Villa, Abella, Alba, Almécija, Bolet, Koufos, Knoll, Luján, Morales, Robles, Sánchez and Delfino2018) for Varanus; Man et al. (Reference Man, Yishu, Peng and Xiaobing2011) for crocodiles; Prum et al. (Reference Prum, Berv, Dornburg, Field, Townsend, Lemmon and Lemmon2015) for birds; and Pol et al. (Reference Pol, Nascimento, Carvalho, Riccomini, Pires-Domingues and Zaher2014) for Notosuchia. Both phylogenies were dated using Time Tree of Life (http://www.timetree.org). When the ages of two successive nodes collapsed, we arbitrarily added 1 Myr in between the more-inclusive and less-inclusive nodes to facilitate the graphic visualization of the topology. For Notosuchia, nodes were dated according to the last appearance datum (LAD) of the oldest fossil included in each node taken from the Paleobiology Database (https://paleobiodb.org). The age of the node Notosuchia (113 Myr) corresponds to the LAD of Malawisuchus mwakasyungutiensis. The age of the node Armadillosuchus–Baurusuchus (100.5 Myr) corresponds to the LAD of Chimaerasuchus paradoxus. The age of the node Iberosuchus–Baurusuchus (83.6 Myr) corresponds to the LAD of Comahuesuchus brachybuccalis, Pehuenchesuchus enderi, Cynodontosuchus rothi, and Wargosuchus australis. Finally, the age of the node Stratiotosuchus–Baurusuchus (66 Myr) corresponds to the LAD of these taxa. The latter (Stratiotosuchus–Baurusuchus), as well as Armadillosuchus arrudai, come from the Adamantina Formation, the age of which is still debated. We follow the hypothesis of a Campanian–Maastrichtian age proposed by some authors (e.g., Gobbo-Rodrigues et al. Reference Gobbo-Rodrigues, Petri and Bertini1999; Batezelli Reference Batezelli2017).

Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships among extant taxa used to construct the thermophysiology inference model and the extinct Notosuchia for which we performed paleobiological inferences. Sources of topology and divergence times are cited in the main text. Scale on the right: geologic time in millions of years (Myr).

Testing the Relationship between RBCsize and Bone Vascular Canal Diameter Using PGLS

Supplementary File 1 contains the sample (31 species of extant tetrapods) and the phylogeny (topology and divergence times) used to test the relationships between the response variables (RBCwidth and RBCarea) and the explanatory variables (femoral vascular canal diameter and femoral cross-sectional area including the medullary cavity). Thin sections of extant taxa are curated at the Vertebrate Hard Tissue Collection of the Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, and are available on request to the curator (D. Germain). RBCwidth (defined as RBC minimum diameter) and RBCarea (either published values or values computed using maximum and minimum published diameters and assuming an ellipse) were taken from the literature (Supplementary File 2). Femoral vascular canal diameters (white arrowheads in Fig. 2) were computed as Canharmean and Canmin, as defined by Huttenlocker and Farmer (Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017). Canharmean, Canmin, and femoral cross-sectional area were either quantified in this study or taken from Huttenlocker and Farmer (Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017) (data available in Supplementary File 2).

Figure 2. Transverse thin section, lateral side, of the femur of Araripesuchus wegeneri Buffetaut, Reference Buffetaut1981, observed in cross-polarized light with lambda wave plate. The thin section was made from a partial femur (MNHN.F.GDF660) from the Aptian of Gadoufaoua (Niger), and is curated at the Museum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN) (Paris, France). The cortex is made of lamellar-zonal bone. It is composed of three zones formed at moderate growth rate and containing vascular canals (white arrowheads) included in primary osteons, and three annuli formed at low growth rates and made of parallel fibered bone (black arrowheads). Periosteum is on the top and medullary cavity on the bottom. The continuous black line occurring near the medullary cavity is an artifact. Scale bar, 0.5 mm.

The method of ordinary least-squares regression makes the assumption of no covariance between residuals obtained from the regression equation (i.e., the off-diagonals of the variance–covariance matrix are expected to contain zeros) (Symonds and Blomberg Reference Symonds, Blomberg and Garamszegi2014). In analyses using interspecific data, this assumption is not verified because of the hierarchical, shared phylogenetic history among terminal taxa (i.e., closely related species are more similar than expected by chance). PGLS (Grafen Reference Grafen1989; Martins and Hansen Reference Martins, Hansen and Martins1996; Rohlf Reference Rohlf2001; Symonds and Blomberg Reference Symonds, Blomberg and Garamszegi2014) overcomes this problem by using a variance–covariance matrix in which off-diagonals correspond to the phylogenetic history shared by the two species under comparison. Symonds and Blomberg (Reference Symonds, Blomberg and Garamszegi2014) described PGLS as a “weighted regression” in which data points corresponding to closely related species are “downweighted.” We ran PGLS using the function pgls of the package caper (Orme et al. Reference Orme, Freckleton, Thomas, Petzoldt, Fritz, Isaac and Pearse2013) in R (R Development Core Team 2008).

Inferring the Thermophysiology of Notosuchia Using PLR

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic relationships among extant taxa (46 species of tetrapods) used to construct the thermophysiology inference model (to infer the probability of being endothermic) and the extinct Notosuchia for which we performed paleobiological inferences. This model was constructed using femoral vascular canal diameter (Canharmean and Canmin) and femoral cross-sectional area as explanatory variables. As noted earlier, femoral Canharmean, Canmin, and femoral cross-sectional area were either quantified in this study or taken from Huttenlocker and Farmer (Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017) (data available in Supplementary File 3). As before, thin sections of extant taxa are curated at the Vertebrate Hard Tissue Collection of the Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. Data for Notosuchia are taken from Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020): Araripesuchus wegeneri, Armadillosuchus arrudai, Baurusuchus sp., Iberosuchus macrodon, and Stratiotosuchus maxhechti. Considering that the model was constructed using femora of extant species, we performed inferences only for those Notosuchia for which data for femora were available. Sample size was smaller for PGLS analyses, because data for RBCsize were not available for many species analyzed in PLR analyses. PLR is a generalized linear model explaining the probability of occurrence of the state “presence” of a binary response (dependent) variable (here the “presence of endothermy”) using continuous explanatory (independent) variables when residual variation of the former variable is phylogenetically structured (Ives and Garland Reference Ives and Garland2010). The regression coefficients computed do account for phylogenetic correlation; when data are not phylogenetically structured, these coefficients are those of standard logistic regression (Ives and Garland Reference Ives and Garland2010). PLR models contain two components. The first is controlled by parameters α (the transition rate) and μ (the asymptotic probability of being in state 1 [here the asymptotic probability of being endotherm]). Parameter α equals α1 + α0; α1 being the probability that the response variable switches from 0 to 1 in each small time increment when it evolves up a phylogenetic tree, whereas the α0 parameter is the probability that it evolves from 1 to 0 (Ives and Garland Reference Ives and Garland2010). The transition rate α is a measure of phylogenetic signal, because the larger the α, the quicker the evolutionary transitions and the lower the phylogenetic structure of data (Ives and Garland Reference Ives and Garland2010). In the second component, the probability of occurrence of the state “presence of endothermy” is modeled using values of the independent (explanatory) variable (here bone vascular canal diameter). Parameters α and μ are estimated using an iterative process in which μ is estimated given α, using the quasi-likelihood function, and α is estimated given μ, using least squares until convergence (Ives and Garland Reference Ives and Garland2010). Analyses were performed using the package phyloglm (Tung Ho and Ané Reference Tung Ho and Ané2014) in R (R Development Core Team 2008).

Results

Testing the Relationship between RBCsize and Bone Vascular Canal Diameter Using PGLS

We used PGLS to test the relationships between RBCwidth and RBCarea and the explanatory variables femoral vascular canal diameter (computed as Canharmean and Canmin) and femoral cross-sectional area (data available in Supplementary File 2). Shapiro-Wilk normality tests showed that residuals of PGLS regression of RBCarea to Canharmean + bone cross-sectional area and the regression RBCarea to Canmin + bone cross-sectional area do not follow a normal distribution (p-values of 0.0007557 and 0.001896, respectively). Thus, we performed a log transformation of all variables. After log transformation, residuals of all four PGLS regressions (RBCarea and RBCarea to the explanatory variables bone cross-sectional area and either Canmin or Canharmean) do follow a normal distribution. All four of these PGLS regressions were significant and, in each regression, both explanatory variables (bone cross-sectional area and either Canmin or Canharmean) were significant (Table 1).

Table 1. Testing the relationship between the dependent variables used to quantify red blood cell size (RBCsize; RBCwidth and RBCarea) and the explanatory variables femoral vascular canal diameter (computed either as Canmin or Canharmean) and femoral cross-sectional area using phylogenetic generalized least-squares regression. *p-value < 0.05; **p-value < 0.01; ***p-value < 0.001.

Inferring the Thermophysiology of Notosuchia Using PLR

We used PLR to construct models aimed at computing the probability of being endothermic using paleohistological features (data available in Supplementary File 3). When Canharmean was used as the explanatory variable, we obtained a model with a transition rate α of 0.00144, an intercept estimate of 6.04 (p-value = 0.004) and an estimate for the coefficient of Canharmean of −0.45 (p-value = 0.001). The negative sign of the Canharmean coefficient indicates that the probability of being endothermic decreases as vascular canal diameter increases. Figure 3 shows the distribution of probabilities of being endothermic as a function of Canharmean variation. The corresponding equation is:

(1)$${\rm ln}[ {\rm p}( {{\rm endothermy}} ) /{\rm p}( {{\rm ectothermy}} ) ] = {-}0.45 ^\ast \,{\rm Ca}{\rm n}_{{\rm harmean}} + 6.04$$

or

(2)$$ \eqalign{ & {\rm p}( {{\rm endothermy}} ) \cr& = {\rm exp}( {-0.45 ^\ast \, {\rm Ca}{\rm n}_{{\rm harmean}} + 6.04} ) / \cr & [ 1 + {\rm exp}( {-0.45^\ast \, {\rm Ca}{\rm n}_{{\rm harmean}} + 6.04} ) ] $$

Figure 3. Distribution of probabilities of being endothermic inferred for our sample of extant tetrapods using a phylogenetic logistic regression model that includes femoral vascular canal diameter (computed as Canharmean) as the explanatory variable.

Ives and Garland (Reference Ives and Garland2010: p. 17) stated that “we assume that if μi <$\;\bar{{\rm \mu }}$, then trait Y will evolve toward 0; […] Conversely, if μi > $\bar{{\rm \mu }}$, then trait Y will evolve toward 1,” where $\bar{{\rm \mu }}$ is the mean probability of being endotherm in our sample. Thus, we considered that $\bar{{\rm \mu }}$ is the cutoff probability, so that an inferred probability higher than $\bar{{\rm \mu }}$ would be evidence for endothermy. Conversely, a probability lower than $\bar{{\rm \mu }}$ would be evidence for ectothermy. When Canharmean was used as the explanatory variable, $\bar{{\rm \mu }}$ = 0.59. To evaluate the predictive power of the model, we constructed a contingency table in which we inferred the thermometabolic regime of each extant species of the sample using its Canharmean. Lines contain predictions (0, inferred ectothermy; 1, inferred endothermy) and columns contain true states (0, observed ectothermy; 1, observed endothermy):

The specificity (the ratio of quantity of true 1 inferred as 1 on the quantity of true 1; Sp = 27/(27 + 2)) equals 0.931. The sensitivity (the ratio of quantity of true 0 inferred as 0 on the quantity of true 0; Se = 14/(14 + 3)) equals 0.824. The classification error (the ratio (quantity of true 0 inferred as 1 + quantity of true 1 inferred as 0)/total; error = (3 + 2)/(14 + 2 + 3 + 27)) equals 0.109. This classification error is quite low, so we used the cutoff probability of 0.59 to perform paleobiological inferences using Canharmean as the explanatory (predictor) variable.

When Canmin was used as the explanatory variable, we obtained a model with a transition rate α of 0.00052, an intercept estimate of 2.58 (p-value = 0.032), and an estimate for the coefficient of Canmin of −0.49 (p-value = 0.018). Figure 4 shows the distribution of probabilities of being endothermic as a function of Canmin variation. The corresponding equation is:

(3)$${\rm ln}[ {\rm p}( {{\rm endothermy}} ) /{\rm p}( {{\rm ectothermy}} ) ] = {-}0.49^\ast \, {\rm Ca}{\rm n}_{{\rm min}} + 2.58$$

or

Figure 4. Distribution of probabilities of being endothermic inferred for our sample of extant tetrapods using a phylogenetic logistic regression model that includes femoral vascular canal diameter (computed as Canmin) as the explanatory variable.

(4)$$ \eqalign{& {\rm p}( {{\rm endothermy}} ) = {\rm exp}( {-0.49^\ast \,{\rm Ca}{\rm n}_{{\rm min}} + 2.58} ) \cr& \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad [ 1 + {\rm exp}( {-0.49^ \ast \,{\rm Ca}{\rm n}_{{\rm min}} + 2.58} ) ] $$

Again we evaluated the quality of the model by constructing a contingency table in which we inferred the thermophysiological regime of each extant species of the sample using its Canmin. We used a cutoff probability of $\bar{{\rm \mu }}$ = 0.32 (the mean probability of being endothermic in our sample), so that an inferred probability lower than 0.32 is evidence for ectothermy and a probability higher than 0.32 is evidence for endothermy:

The specificity (the ratio of quantity of true 1 inferred as 1 on the quantity of true 1; Sp = 20/(20 + 9)) equals 0.690. The sensitivity (the ratio of quantity of true 0 inferred as 0 on the quantity of true 0; Se = 15/(15 + 2)) equals 0.882. The classification error (the ratio (quantity of true 0 inferred as 1 + quantity of true 1 inferred as 0)/total; error = (2 + 9)/(15 + 9 + 2 + 20)) equals 0.239. This classification error is quite high, so we recomputed a new cutoff probability of 0.22 using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Then we constructed a new contingency table in which we inferred the thermophysiological regime of each extant species of the sample using its Canmin and considering that an inferred probability higher than 0.22 is evidence for endothermy:

With this contingency table, the classification error [the ratio (quantity of true 0 inferred as 1 + quantity of true 1 inferred as 0)/total; error = (2 + 1)/(15+ 1 + 2 + 28)] equals 0.0652. This classification error is quite low, so we used the cutoff probability of 0.22 to perform paleobiological inferences using Canmin as the explanatory (predictor) variable.

We used these equations and cutoff probabilities and femoral Canharmean and Canmin values published by Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020) for Notosuchia to compute the probability of these taxa being endotherms (Table 2).

Table 2. Inferring the probability of endothermy for the sample of Notosuchia analyzed in this study using femoral vascular canal diameters (computed either as Canmin or Canharmean) as explanatory variables and phylogenetic logistic regressions. Vascular canal diameters for Notosuchia were taken from Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020).

Discussion

Notosuchia is an extremely diversified group of crocodyliforms. This diversity is particularly striking regarding their diet, suggesting that they occupied various ecological niches (Carvalho and Bertini Reference Carvalho and Bertini1999; Iori and Carvalho Reference Iori and Carvalho2018). Uruguaysuchidae (Pol et al. Reference Pol, Nascimento, Carvalho, Riccomini, Pires-Domingues and Zaher2014), the most basal notosuchians, of which Araripesuchus wegeneri (in our sample) is a representative, range from the Aptian (Araripesuchus gomesii) to the Maastrichtian (Araripesuchus tsangatsangana) (Price Reference Price1959; Turner Reference Turner2006). Several species of this group have been inferred as being omnivorous, or even insectivorous, based on their dental complexity (Sereno and Larsson Reference Sereno and Larsson2009; Soto et al. Reference Soto, Pol and Perea2011; Nieto et al. Reference Nieto, Degrange, Sellers, Pol and Holliday2021) and postcranial remains suggest that they had an erect posture (see “Introduction”). Uruguaysuchids were smaller than Sphagesauridae (Carvalho et al. Reference Carvalho, de Gasparini, Salgado, de Vasconcellos and Marinho2010; Godoy et al. Reference Godoy, Benson, Bronzati and Butler2019). Armadillosuchus (also sampled by us) belongs to the large-bodied sphagesaurids group (Melstrom and Irmis Reference Melstrom and Irmis2019). The diagnosis of this clade is based on its peculiar dentition morphology (Price Reference Price1950). They show extremely complex manducatory systems, with evidence of “chewing” mechanisms, dental wear, and propalinal movements (e.g., see Ősi Reference Ősi2014; Iori and Carvalho Reference Iori and Carvalho2018). The foraging abilities of some notosuchians, such as Armadillosuchus, Mariliasuchus, or Malawisuchus, to locate food or water have led some authors to propose the presence of burrowing habits (Gomani Reference Gomani1997; Nobre et al. Reference Nobre, de Souza Carvalho, de Vasconcellos and Souto2008; Marinho and Carvalho Reference Marinho and Carvalho2009), a behavior that might play a role in thermoregulation (e.g., to search for a cooler shelter during dry periods, as in extant crocodilian species; Campos and Magnusson Reference Campos and Magnusson2013). This behavior has also been proposed for the sebecosuchian Baurusuchus salgadoensis (Vasconcellos and Carvalho Reference Vasconcellos and Carvalho2010). Sebecosuchia (to which Iberosuchus and Stratiotosuchus, also sampled by us, belong) were large predators with an erect posture (see “Introduction”) and cursorial abilities (Nascimento and Zaher Reference Nascimento and Zaher2010; Riff and Kellner Reference Riff and Kellner2011), feeding on large prey, including small sphagesaurids (Godoy et al. Reference Godoy, Montefeltro, Norell and Langer2014). Indeed, their ziphodont teeth (unicuspidated, laterally compressed with serrated carinae) associated with the biomechanical performances of their skull allowed sebecosuchians to effectively handle prey after wounding it (Montefeltro et al. Reference Montefeltro, Lautenschlager, Godoy, Ferreira and Butler2020). It is noteworthy that the inferred ectothermic sebecosuchians occupy a niche usually occupied by endothermic theropod dinosaurs (Benson et al. Reference Benson, Mannion, Butler, Upchurch, Goswami and Evans2013; Zanno and Makovicky Reference Zanno and Makovicky2013).

The ectothermic condition of Notosuchia suggested by Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020) is supported by the results of the present study using larger sample sizes of extant species and a more robust phylogenetic comparative method (PLR). First, the finding that RBCsize is related to bone vascular canal diameter (Huttenlocker and Farmer Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017) is supported by our results obtained using a sample size more than twice of that used by these authors. Thus bone vascular canal diameter can be used as a proxy to infer RBCsize, and then endothermy (because within tetrapods, RBCsize is lower in endotherms than in ectotherms; Snyder and Sheafor Reference Snyder and Sheafor1999). Huttenlocker and Farmer (Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017) included bone cross-sectional area (in addition to bone vascular canal diameter) as an explanatory variable in models aimed at explaining the variation of RBCsize. However, in their study, bone cross-sectional area did not improve the explanatory power of models and was not retained (Huttenlocker and Farmer Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017; Supplemental Information, “Analysis I, Training Data Set for Extant Taxa”). Unexpectedly, our analyses (using a larger sample size) showed that bone cross-sectional area significantly improves the explanatory power of models and is retained, together with bone vascular canal diameter, in models explaining the variation of RBCsize. The fact that the estimate for bone cross-sectional area is always negative (Table 1) indicates that RBCsize decreases as bone cross-sectional area increases. Second, notosuchian thermometabolism is inferred here using a larger sample of extant tetrapods (more than three times the sample used by Cubo et al. [Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020]) and logistic phylogenetic regressions (a method more reliable than those used in previous studies; see below). We are aware of the fact that Huttenlocker and Farmer (Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017) showed that histological changes reflect changes in VO2max better than changes in thermometabolism. However, we have found here that microstructural variation is linked to thermometabolism too. The models constructed to infer the probability of endothermy using vascular canal size as an explanatory (predictive) variable were highly significant, and the classification errors obtained are quite low (6.5% using Canmin). Thus we conclude that we can use these models confidently in paleobiological inference of thermometabolism.

Thermal paleophysiology is an emergent discipline (Cubo and Huttenlocker Reference Cubo and Huttenlocker2020). It has great potential resulting from the synergy between physiological studies aimed at deciphering the mechanisms of thermogenesis in extant amniotes (e.g., Bal and Periasamy Reference Bal and Periasamy2020; Jastroch and Seebacher Reference Jastroch and Seebacher2020; Grigg et al. Reference Grigg, Nowack, Bicudo, Pereira, Bal, Woodward and Seymour2021) and paleobiological inferences in extinct amniotes using phylogenetic comparative methods (e.g., Cubo et al. Reference Cubo, Le Roy, Martinez-Maza and Montes2012, Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020, Reference Cubo, Buscalioni, Legendre, Bourdon, Sanz and de Ricqlès2022; Legendre et al. Reference Legendre, Guénard, Botha-Brink and Cubo2016; Huttenlocker and Farmer Reference Huttenlocker and Farmer2017; Olivier et al. Reference Olivier, Houssaye, Jalil and Cubo2017; Fleischle et al. Reference Fleischle, Wintrich and Sander2018; Cubo and Jalil Reference Cubo and Jalil2019; Faure-Brac et al. Reference Faure-Brac, Amiot, de Muizon, Cubo and Lécuyer2021; Knaus et al. Reference Knaus, Van Heteren, Lungmus and Sander2021). Logistic phylogenetic regressions are the third step in efforts performed during the last decade to carry out reliable inferences of thermometabolic status in extinct amniotes. A decade ago, Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Le Roy, Martinez-Maza and Montes2012) inferred bone growth rates using bone histological features and multiple linear regressions tested for significance using permutations in order to circumvent the nonindependence of the observations due to the phylogeny. Considering that bone growth rates are significantly related to RMR in amniotes (Montes et al. Reference Montes, Le Roy, Perret, de Buffrénil, Castanet and Cubo2007), the former was used by Cubo et al. (Reference Cubo, Le Roy, Martinez-Maza and Montes2012) as a proxy to infer the thermometabolic status of extinct archosaurs. This method was used by Legendre et al. (Reference Legendre, Segalen and Cubo2013) to infer the bone growth rate and the thermometabolic status of Euparkeria. In a second step, Legendre et al. (Reference Legendre, Guénard, Botha-Brink and Cubo2016) adapted Guénard et al.'s (Reference Guénard, Legendre and Peres-Neto2013) PEMs to perform paleobiological inferences of RMR. This contribution represented significant methodological progress, because paleobiological inference models included the phylogeny (rather than circumventing its effects, as did the preceding method), assuming an evolutionary model (Molina-Venegas et al. Reference Molina-Venegas, Moreno-Saiz, Castro Parga, Davies, Peres-Neto and Rodríguez2018). PEMs have been widely used to infer the thermometabolic status of extinct amniotes (Legendre et al. Reference Legendre, Guénard, Botha-Brink and Cubo2016; Olivier et al. Reference Olivier, Houssaye, Jalil and Cubo2017; Fleischle et al. Reference Fleischle, Wintrich and Sander2018; Cubo and Jalil Reference Cubo and Jalil2019; Cubo et al. Reference Cubo, Sena, Aubier, Houee, Claisse, Faure-Brac, Allain, Andrade, Sayão and Oliveira2020, Reference Cubo, Buscalioni, Legendre, Bourdon, Sanz and de Ricqlès2022; Faure-Brac and Cubo Reference Faure-Brac and Cubo2020; Faure-Brac et al. Reference Faure-Brac, Amiot, de Muizon, Cubo and Lécuyer2021; Knaus et al. Reference Knaus, Van Heteren, Lungmus and Sander2021). Using logistic phylogenetic regressions is a new step in this sequence. This method improves upon the previous approach by using all of the phylogenetic information (rather than a fraction of it, as did PEMs in order to avoid model overfitting). An encouraging sign is that results are congruent in spite of the diversity of methods used to obtain them. Inferring the maximum metabolic rate of Notosuchia using the size of femoral nutrient foramina (Seymour et al. Reference Seymour, Smith, White, Henderson and Schwarz-Wings2012) would be the next promising step to fully understand the thermophysiology of these amazing crocodylomorphs.

Acknowledgments

We thank H. Lamrous (Sorbonne Université) for helping us with picture acquisition using bone thin sections at the Vertebrate Hard Tissue Collection of the Museum national d'Histoire naturelle (Paris). This study was partly funded by the project Emergences Sorbonne Université 2019 no. 243374 to J.C. The authors declare no competing interests.

Data Availability Statement

Data available from the Dryad and Zenodo Digital Repositories: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.80gb5mktb, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6795231.

References

Literature Cited

Andrews, R. M., and Pough, F. H.. 1985. Metabolism of squamate reptiles: allometric and ecological relationships. Physiological Zoology 58:214231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ast, J. C. 2001. Mitochondrial DNA evidence and evolution in Varanoidea (Squamata). Cladistics 17:211226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bal, N. C., and Periasamy, M.. 2020. Uncoupling of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase pump activity by sarcolipin as the basis for muscle non-shivering thermogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 375:20190135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batezelli, A. 2017. Continental systems tracts of the Brazilian Cretaceous Bauru Basin and their relationship with the tectonic and climatic evolution of South America. Basin Research 29:125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, R. B. J., Mannion, P. D., Butler, R. J., Upchurch, P., Goswami, A., and Evans, S. E.. 2013. Cretaceous tetrapod fossil record sampling and faunal turnover: implications for biogeography and the rise of modern clades. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 372:88107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffetaut, E. 1981. Die biogeographische Geschichte der Krokodilier, mit Beschreibung einer neuen Art, Araripesuchus wegeneri. Geologische Rundschau 70:611624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Z., and Magnusson, W. E.. 2013. Thermal relations of dwarf caiman, Paleosuchus palpebrosus, in a hillside stream: evidence for an unusual thermal niche among crocodilians. Journal of Thermal Biology 38:2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, D. R. 1987. The evolution of locomotor stamina in tetrapods: circumventing a mechanical constraint. Paleobiology 13:326341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, I. S., and Bertini, R. J.. 1999. Mariliasuchus: um novo Crocodylomorpha (Notosuchia) do Cretáceo da Bacia Bauru. Geología Colombiana 24:83105.Google Scholar
Carvalho, I. de S., de Gasparini, Z. B., Salgado, L., de Vasconcellos, F. M., and Marinho, T. da S.. 2010. Climate's role in the distribution of the Cretaceous terrestrial Crocodyliformes throughout Gondwana. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 297:252262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A., and Pörtner, H.-O.. 2010. Temperature, metabolic power and the evolution of endothermy. Biological Reviews 85:703727.Google ScholarPubMed
Cubo, J., and Huttenlocker, A. K.. 2020. Vertebrate palaeophysiology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 375:20190130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cubo, J., and Jalil, N.-E.. 2019. Bone histology of Azendohsaurus laaroussii: implications for the evolution of thermometabolism in Archosauromorpha. Paleobiology 45:317330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubo, J., Le Roy, N., Martinez-Maza, C., and Montes, L.. 2012. Paleohistological estimation of bone growth rate in extinct archosaurs. Paleobiology 38:335349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubo, J., Sena, M. V. A., Aubier, P., Houee, G., Claisse, P., Faure-Brac, M. G., Allain, R., Andrade, R. C. L. P., Sayão, J. M., and Oliveira, G. R.. 2020. Were Notosuchia (Pseudosuchia: Crocodylomorpha) warm-blooded? A palaeohistological analysis suggests ectothermy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 131:154162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubo, J., Buscalioni, A.D., Legendre, L. J., Bourdon, E., Sanz, J. L. and de Ricqlès, A.. 2022. Palaeohistological inferences of resting metabolic rates in Concornis and Iberomesornis (Enantiornithes, Ornithothoraces) from the Lower Cretaceous of Las Hoyas (Spain). Palaeontology 65:e12583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure-Brac, M. G., and Cubo, J.. 2020. Were the synapsids primitively endotherms? A palaeohistological approach using phylogenetic eigenvector maps. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 375:20190138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faure-Brac, M. G., Amiot, R., de Muizon, C., Cubo, J., and Lécuyer, C.. 2021. Combined paleohistological and isotopic inferences of thermometabolism in extinct Neosuchia, using Goniopholis and Dyrosaurus (Pseudosuchia: Crocodylomorpha) as case studies. Paleobiology 48:302323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischle, C. V., Wintrich, T., and Sander, P. M.. 2018. Quantitative histological models suggest endothermy in plesiosaurs. PeerJ 6:e4955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobbo-Rodrigues, S. R., Petri, S. and Bertini, R. J.. 1999. Ocorrências de ostrácodes na Formação Araçatuba do Grupo Bauru, Cretáceo Superior da Bacia do Paraná e possibilidades de correlação com depósitos isócronos argentinos—parte i: Familia Hylocyprididae. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 23:313.Google Scholar
Godoy, P. L., Montefeltro, F. C., Norell, M. A., and Langer, M. C.. 2014. An additional Baurusuchid from the Cretaceous of Brazil with evidence of interspecific predation among Crocodyliformes. PLoS ONE 9:e97138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godoy, P. L., Bronzati, M., Eltink, E., Marsola, J. C. A., Cidade, G. M., Langer, M., and Montefeltro, F.. 2016. Postcranial anatomy of Pissarrachampsa sera (Crocodyliformes, Baurusuchidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil: insights on lifestyle and phylogenetic significance. PeerJ 4:e2075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godoy, P. L., Benson, R. B. J., Bronzati, M., and Butler, R. J.. 2019. The multi-peak adaptive landscape of crocodylomorph body size evolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology 19:167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomani, E. M. 1997. A crocodyliform from the Early Cretaceous Dinosaur Beds, northern Malawi. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 17:280294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 326:119157.Google ScholarPubMed
Grigg, G., Nowack, J., Bicudo, J. E., Pereira, W., Bal, N. C., Woodward, H. N., and Seymour, R. S.. 2021. Whole-body endothermy: ancient, homologous and widespread among the ancestors of mammals, birds and crocodylians. Biological Reviews 97:766801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guénard, G., Legendre, P., and Peres-Neto, P.. 2013. Phylogenetic eigenvector maps: a framework to model and predict species traits. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4:11201131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, F. A., and Lessler, M. A.. 1964. Erythrocyte measurements in fishes, amphibia and reptiles. Biological Bulletin 126:8388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocker, A. K., and Farmer, C. G.. 2017. Bone microvasculature tracks red blood cell size diminution in Triassic mammal and dinosaur forerunners. Current Biology 27:4854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iori, F.V., and Carvalho, I. S.. 2018. The Cretaceous crocodyliform Caipirasuchus: behavioral feeding mechanisms. Cretaceous Research 84:181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, A. R., and Garland, T.. 2010. Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Systematic Biology 59:926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jastroch, M., and Seebacher, F.. 2020. Importance of adipocyte browning in the evolution of endothermy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 375:20190134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knaus, P. L., Van Heteren, A. H., Lungmus, J. K., and Sander, P. M.. 2021. High blood flow into the femur indicates elevated aerobic capacity in synapsids since the reptile-mammal split. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9:751238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., Hallström, B. M., and Janke, A.. 2013. Coalescent-based genome analyses resolve the early branches of the Euarchontoglires. PLoS ONE 8:e60019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legendre, L. J., and Davesne, D.. 2020. The evolution of mechanisms involved in vertebrate endothermy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 375:20190136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legendre, L. J., Segalen, L., and Cubo, J.. 2013. Evidence for high bone growth rate in Euparkeria obtained using a new paleohistological inference model for the humerus. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 33:13431350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, L. J., Guénard, G., Botha-Brink, J., and Cubo, J.. 2016. Palaeohistological evidence for ancestral high metabolic rate in archosaurs. Systematic Biology 65:989996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Man, Z., Yishu, W., Peng, Y., and Xiaobing, W.. 2011. Crocodilian phylogeny inferred from twelve mitochondrial protein-coding genes, with new complete mitochondrial genomic sequences for Crocodylus acutus and Crocodylus novaeguineae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 60:6267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinho, T. S., and Carvalho, I. S.. 2009. An armadillo-like sphagesaurid crocodyliform from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 27:3641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, E. P., and Hansen, T. F.. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. Pp. 2275 in Martins, E. P., ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Melstrom, K. M., and Irmis, R. B.. 2019. Repeated evolution of herbivorous crocodyliforms during the age of dinosaurs. Current Biology 29:23892395.e3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, R. W., Janečka, J. E., Gatesy, J., Ryder, O. A., Fisher, C. A., Teeling, E. C., Goodbla, A., Eizirik, E., Simão, T. L. L., Stadler, T., Rabosky, D. L., Honeycutt, R. L., Flynn, J. J., Ingram, C. M., Steiner, C., Williams, T. L., Robinson, T. J., Burk-Herrick, A., Westerman, M., Ayoub, N. A., Springer, M. S., and Murphy, W. J.. 2011. Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334:521524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina-Venegas, R., Moreno-Saiz, J. C., Castro Parga, I., Davies, T. J., Peres-Neto, P. R., and Rodríguez, M. Á.. 2018. Assessing among-lineage variability in phylogenetic imputation of functional trait datasets. Ecography 41:17401749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montefeltro, F. C., Lautenschlager, S., Godoy, P. L., Ferreira, G. S., and Butler, R. J.. 2020. A unique predator in a unique ecosystem: modelling the apex predator within a Late Cretaceous crocodyliform-dominated fauna from Brazil. Journal of Anatomy 237:323333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, L., Le Roy, N., Perret, M., de Buffrénil, V., Castanet, J., and Cubo, J.. 2007. Relationships between bone growth rate, body mass and resting metabolic rate in growing amniotes: a phylogenetic approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 92:6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascimento, P. M., and Zaher, H.. 2010. A new species of Baurusuchus (Crocodyliformes, Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil, with the first complete postcranial skeleton described for the family Baurusuchidae. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 50:323361.Google Scholar
Nieto, M. N., Degrange, F. J., Sellers, K. C., Pol, D., and Holliday, C. M.. 2021. Biomechanical performance of the cranio-mandibular complex of the small notosuchian Araripesuchus gomesii (Notosuchia, Uruguaysuchidae). Anatomical Record, https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nobre, P. H., de Souza Carvalho, I., de Vasconcellos, F. M., and Souto, P. R.. 2008. Feeding behavior of the Gondwanic Crocodylomorpha Mariliasuchus amarali from the Upper Cretaceous Bauru Basin, Brazil. Gondwana Research 13:139145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, C., Houssaye, A., Jalil, N.-E., and Cubo, J.. 2017. First palaeohistological inference of resting metabolic rate in an extinct synapsid, Moghreberia nmachouensis (Therapsida: Anomodontia). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 121:409419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orme, D., Freckleton, R., Thomas, G. H., Petzoldt, T., Fritz, S., Isaac, N., and Pearse, W.. 2013. Caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caper, accessed 23 May 2022.Google Scholar
Ősi, A. 2014. The evolution of jaw mechanism and dental function in heterodont crocodyliforms. Historical Biology 26:279414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pol, D. 2005. Postcranial remains of Notosuchus terrestris Woodward (Archosauria: Crocodyliformes) from the upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. Ameghiniana 42:2138.Google Scholar
Pol, D., Nascimento, P. M., Carvalho, A. B., Riccomini, C., Pires-Domingues, R. A., and Zaher, H.. 2014. A new notosuchian from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil and the phylogeny of advanced notosuchians. PLoS ONE 9:e93105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, L. I. 1950. On a new Crocodilia, Sphagesaurus from the Cretaceous of State of São Paulo, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 22:7783.Google Scholar
Price, L. I. 1959. Sobre um crocodilideo notossuquio do Cretacico Brasileiro. Serviço Gráfico do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Prum, R. O., Berv, J. S., Dornburg, A., Field, D. J., Townsend, J. P., Lemmon, E. M., and Lemmon, A. R.. 2015. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526:569573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyron, R. A., and Wiens, J. J.. 2011. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61:543583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Riff, D., and Kellner, A. W. A.. 2011. Baurusuchid crocodyliforms as theropod mimics: clues from the skull and appendicular morphology of Stratiotosuchus maxhechti (Upper Cretaceous of Brazil). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 163:S37S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:21432160.Google ScholarPubMed
Sereno, P., and Larsson, H.. 2009. Cretaceous crocodyliforms from the Sahara. ZooKeys 28:1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, R. S., Smith, S. L., White, C. R., Henderson, D. M., and Schwarz-Wings, D.. 2012. Blood flow to long bones indicates activity metabolism in mammals, reptiles and dinosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 279:451456.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. K., and Sheafor, B. A.. 1999. Red blood cells: centerpiece in the evolution of the vertebrate circulatory system. Integrative and Comparative Biology 39:189198.Google Scholar
Soslau, G. 2020. The role of the red blood cell and platelet in the evolution of mammalian and avian endothermy. Journal of Experimental Zoology B 334:113127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto, M., Pol, D., and Perea, D.. 2011. A new specimen of Uruguaysuchus aznarezi (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the middle Cretaceous of Uruguay and its phylogenetic relationships. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 163:S173S198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symonds, M. R. E., and Blomberg, S. P.. 2014. A primer on phylogenetic generalised least squares. Pp. 105130 in Garamszegi, L. Z., ed. Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: concepts and practice. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tung Ho, L.-s., and Ané, C.. 2014. A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Systematic Biology 63:397408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. H. 2006. Osteology and phylogeny of a new species of Araripesuchus (Crocodyliformes: Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Historical Biology 18:255369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A., and Jetz, W.. 2019. Inferring the mammal tree: species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biology 17:e3000494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasconcellos, F. M., and Carvalho, I. D. S.. 2010. Paleoichnological assemblage associated with Baurusuchus salgadoensis remains, a Baurusuchidae Mesoeucrocodylia from the Bauru Basin, Brazil (Late Cretaceous). Bulletin of the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science 51:227237.Google Scholar
Villa, A., Abella, J., Alba, D. M., Almécija, S., Bolet, A., Koufos, G. D., Knoll, F., Luján, À. H., Morales, J., Robles, J. M., Sánchez, I. M., and Delfino, M.. 2018. Revision of Varanus marathonensis (Squamata, Varanidae) based on historical and new material: morphology, systematics, and paleobiogeography of the European monitor lizards. PLoS ONE 13:e0207719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, X.-C., and Sues, H.-D.. 1996. Anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Chimaerasuchus paradoxus, an unusual crocodyliform reptile from the Lower Cretaceous of Hubei, China. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16:688702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanno, L. E., and Makovicky, P. J.. 2013. Neovenatorid theropods are apex predators in the Late Cretaceous of North America. Nature Communications 4:2827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurano, J. P., Magalhães, F. M., Asato, A. E., Silva, G., Bidau, C. J., Mesquita, D. O., and Costa, G. C.. 2019. Cetartiodactyla: updating a time-calibrated molecular phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 133:256262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships among extant taxa used to construct the thermophysiology inference model and the extinct Notosuchia for which we performed paleobiological inferences. Sources of topology and divergence times are cited in the main text. Scale on the right: geologic time in millions of years (Myr).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Transverse thin section, lateral side, of the femur of Araripesuchus wegeneri Buffetaut, 1981, observed in cross-polarized light with lambda wave plate. The thin section was made from a partial femur (MNHN.F.GDF660) from the Aptian of Gadoufaoua (Niger), and is curated at the Museum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN) (Paris, France). The cortex is made of lamellar-zonal bone. It is composed of three zones formed at moderate growth rate and containing vascular canals (white arrowheads) included in primary osteons, and three annuli formed at low growth rates and made of parallel fibered bone (black arrowheads). Periosteum is on the top and medullary cavity on the bottom. The continuous black line occurring near the medullary cavity is an artifact. Scale bar, 0.5 mm.

Figure 2

Table 1. Testing the relationship between the dependent variables used to quantify red blood cell size (RBCsize; RBCwidth and RBCarea) and the explanatory variables femoral vascular canal diameter (computed either as Canmin or Canharmean) and femoral cross-sectional area using phylogenetic generalized least-squares regression. *p-value < 0.05; **p-value < 0.01; ***p-value < 0.001.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Distribution of probabilities of being endothermic inferred for our sample of extant tetrapods using a phylogenetic logistic regression model that includes femoral vascular canal diameter (computed as Canharmean) as the explanatory variable.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Distribution of probabilities of being endothermic inferred for our sample of extant tetrapods using a phylogenetic logistic regression model that includes femoral vascular canal diameter (computed as Canmin) as the explanatory variable.

Figure 5

Table 2. Inferring the probability of endothermy for the sample of Notosuchia analyzed in this study using femoral vascular canal diameters (computed either as Canmin or Canharmean) as explanatory variables and phylogenetic logistic regressions. Vascular canal diameters for Notosuchia were taken from Cubo et al. (2020).