Book contents
- Chaucer’s Early Modern Readers
- Chaucer’s Early Modern Readers
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Glossing, Correcting, and Emending
- Chapter 2 Repairing and Completing
- Chapter 3 Supplementing
- Chapter 4 Authorising
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index of Manuscripts
- Index of Early Printed Books
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2023
Book contents
- Chaucer’s Early Modern Readers
- Chaucer’s Early Modern Readers
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Glossing, Correcting, and Emending
- Chapter 2 Repairing and Completing
- Chapter 3 Supplementing
- Chapter 4 Authorising
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index of Manuscripts
- Index of Early Printed Books
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Chaucer's Early Modern ReadersReception in Print and Manuscript, pp. 230 - 253Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Primary Sources
Anglicus, Bartholomaeus. De proprietatibus rerum, trans. by John Trevisa (Westminster: Wynkyn de Worde, c. 1496; STC 1536).Google Scholar
Braithwait, Richard. Comment upon the Two Tales of our Ancient, Renowned, and Ever Living Poet Sr. Ieffray Chaucer, Knight (John Dawson, 1665; Wing B4260).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. [Canterbury tales] (Westminster?: Richard Pynson, c. 1492; STC 5084).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey [Canterbury tales] (Westminster: William Caxton, c. 1476; STC 5082).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey [Canterbury tales] (Westminster: William Caxton, c. 1483; STC 5083).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey Here begynneth the boke of Canterbury tales, dilygently and truely corrected, and newly printed (Richard Pynson, 1526; STC 5086).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey Here begynneth the boke of fame, made by Geffray Chaucer: with dyuers other of his workes (Richard Pynson, c. 1526; STC 5088).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey Here begynneth the boke of Troylus and Creseyde, newly printed by a trewe copye (Richard Pynson, c. 1526; STC 5096).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey Queen Anelida and false Arcyte (Westminster: William Caxton, c. 1477, STC 5090).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The boke of Chaucer named Caunterbury Tales (Wynkyn de Worde, 1498; STC 5085).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The book of fame made by Gefferey Chaucer (Westminster: William Caxton, c. 1483; STC 5087).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The noble and amerous au[n]cyent hystory of Troylus and Cresyde, in the tyme of the syege of Troye (Wynkyn de Worde, 1517; STC 5095).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Temple of Bras (Westminster: William Caxton, c. 1477; STC 5091).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Workes of Geffrey Chaucer, newlie printed, with diuers addicions, whiche were neuer in printe before, ed. by Stow, John (John Kingston, 1561; STC 5075–6).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Workes of Geffray Chaucer newly printed, with dyuers workes whiche were neuer in print before, ed. by Thynne, William (Nicholas Hill, c. 1550; STC 5071–4).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Workes of Geffray Chaucer newly printed, with dyuers workes whiche were neuer in print before, ed. by Thynne, William (Richard Grafton, 1542; STC 5069–70).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Workes of Geffray Chaucer newly printed, with dyuers workes whiche were neuer in print before, ed. by Thynne, William (Thomas Godfray, 1532; STC 5068).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Workes of our Antient and Learned English Poet, Geffrey Chaucer, newly printed, ed. by Speght, Thomas (Adam Islip, 1598; STC 5077–9).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Workes of our Ancient and learned English Poet, Geffrey Chaucer, newly Printed, ed. by Speght, Thomas (Adam Islip, 1602; STC 5080–1).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Works of our Ancient, Learned, & Excellent English Poet, Jeffrey Chaucer ([s.n.], 1687; Wing C3736).Google Scholar
‘Chaucer (Junior), ’. Canterbury tales: composed for the entertainment of all ingenuous young men and maids at their merry meetings (for J. Back, 1687; Wing C455A).Google Scholar
Cooper, Thomas. Thesaurus Linguae Romanae et Britannicae (Henry Denham, 1578; STC 5688).Google Scholar
Cowper, William. The anatomie of a Christian man (T[homas] S[nodham], 1611; STC 5912).Google Scholar
de Cessolis, Jacobus. The game of chess, trans. by William Caxton from Jean de Vignay (Westminster: William Caxton, 1483; STC 4921).Google Scholar
Earle, John. Micro-cosmographie. Or, a peece of the world discouered (William Stansby, 1628; STC 7441).Google Scholar
Gerard, John. The herball or Generall historie of plantes (for Adam Islip, Joyce Norton, and Richard Whitaker, 1633; STC 11751).Google Scholar
Gorranus, Nicolaus. In quatuour Euangelia commentarius (Antwerp: Ioannes Keerberg, 1617).Google Scholar
Harington, John. Orlando furioso in English heroical verse (Richard Field, 1591; STC 746).Google Scholar
Henryson, Robert. The testament of Cresseid (Edinburgh: Henry Charteris, 1593; STC 13165).Google Scholar
Heywood, Jasper. The seconde tragedie of Seneca entituled Thyestes (Thomas Berthelet, 1560; STC 22226).Google Scholar
Hilton, John. Catch That Catch Can (for John Benson and John Playford, 1652; Wing H2036).Google Scholar
Jack vp Lande compyled by the famous Geoffrey Chaucer ([Southwark]: [J. Nicolson], [1536?]; STC 5098).Google Scholar
James, Thomas. An explanation or enlarging of the ten articles in the supplication of Doctor Iames, lately exhibited to the clergy of England (Oxford: John Lichfield and William Turner, 1625; STC 14454).Google Scholar
Langland, William. The vision of Pierce Plowman, now fyrste imprinted by Roberte Crowley (Robert Crowley; STC 19906).Google Scholar
Miège, Guy. A new dictionary French and English, with another English and French (Thomas Dawks, 1677; Wing M2016).Google Scholar
Musculus, Wolfgang. In Esaiam prophetam commentarii (Basel: Sebastian Henricpetri 1623).Google Scholar
Pits, John. Relationum historicarum de rebus Anglicis tomus primus (Paris: Rolin Thierry and Sebastien Cramoisy, 1619; USTC 6015910).Google Scholar
Rainolds, William. A refutation of sundry reprehensions, cauils, and false sleights […] (Paris: for Richard Vestegan?, 1583; STC 20632).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies (Isaac Jaggard and Edward Blount, 1623; STC 22273).Google Scholar
Smith, Henry. Sermon of the Benefit of Contentation (Abell Jeffes, 1591; STC 22696.5).Google Scholar
Stow, John The vision of Pierce Plowman […] Wherevnto is also annexed the Crede of Pierce Plowman (Owen Rogers, 1561; STC 19908).Google Scholar
Tyndale, William. The whole workes of W. Tyndall, Iohn Frith, and Doc. Barnes (John Day, 1573; STC 24436).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Akbari, Suzanne Conklin, and Simpson, James, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Chaucer (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Alderson, William L., and Henderson, Arnold C.. Chaucer and Augustan Scholarship (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Alexander, David. ‘Faithorne, Loggan, Vandrebanc and White: The Engraved Portrait in Late Seventeeth-Century Britain’, in Printed Images in Early Modern Britain: Essays in Interpretation, ed. by Hunter, Michael (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), pp. 297–316.Google Scholar
Allington, Daniel, Brewer, David A., Colclough, Stephen, Echard, Siân, and Lesser, Zachary. The Book in Britain: A Historical Introduction (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Lilian. ‘The Decoration and Illustration of Venetian Incunabula: From Hand Illumination to the Design of Woodcuts’, in Printing R-Evolution and Society 1450–1500, ed. by Dondi, Cristina, Storia, Studi Di (Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, 2020), X111, pp. 773–816.Google Scholar
Barr, Helen, ed. The Piers Plowman Tradition: A Critical Edition of Pierce the Ploughman’s Crede, Richard the Redeless, Mum and the Sothsegger and The Crowned King (London: Everyman, 1993).Google Scholar
Baynton, Douglas C. Defectives in the Land: Disability and Immigration in the Age of Eugenics (University of Chicago Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard. ‘Bradshaw’s Chaucer: Some Preliminary Observations’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 17 (2019), 557–74.Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard ‘Geoffrey Spirleng (c. 1426–c. 1494): A Scribe of the Canterbury Tales in His Time’, in Of the Making of Books: Medieval Manuscripts, Their Scribes and Readers. Essays Presented to M. B. Parkes, ed. by Zim, Rivkah and Robinson, Pamela (Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1997), pp. 116–46.Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard Henry Bradshaw and the Foundations of Codicology: The Sandars Lectures 2015 (Cambridge: Privately printed, 2017).Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard ‘Medieval English Manuscripts at Auction 1676–c. 1700’, The Book Collector, 53 (2004), 46–63.Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard ‘The Virtuoso’s Troilus’, in Chaucer Traditions: Studies in Honour of Derek Brewer, ed. by Windeatt, Barry and Morse, Ruth (Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 213–33.Google Scholar
Beadle, Richard and Griffiths, Jeremy. St. John’s College, Cambridge, Manuscript L.1: A Facsimile (Norman, OK: Pilgrim Books; Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, 1983).Google Scholar
Beddard, R. A. P. J. ‘Sancroft, William (1617–1693), archbishop of Canterbury and nonjuror’, ODNB, https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/24610.Google Scholar
Beer, Barrett L. ‘Stow [Stowe], John (1524/5–1605), historian’, ODNB, https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/26611.Google Scholar
Beichner, Paul E. ‘Baiting the Summoner’, Modern Language Quarterly, 22.4 (1961), 367–76.Google Scholar
Benedikz, B. S. A New Catalogue of Printed Books in the Library of Lichfield Cathedral (The Dean and Chapter of Lichfield, 1998).Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, in Illuminations, ed. by Arendt, Hannah, trans. by Zohn, Harry (New York: Schocken, 1968).Google Scholar
Bennett, H. S. English Books & Readers 1603 to 1640: Being a Study in the History of the Book Trade in the Reigns of James I and Charles I (Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Bennett, Kate. ‘Shakespeare’s Monument at Stratford: A New Seventeenth-Century Account’, Notes and Queries, 47.4 (2000), 464, https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/47-4-464a.Google Scholar
Benson, C. David. ‘Critic and Poet: What Lydgate and Henryson Did to Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde’, Modern Language Quarterly, 53.1 (1992), 23–40.Google Scholar
Bishop, Louise M. ‘Father Chaucer and the Vivification of Print’, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 106.3 (2007), 336–63.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann. ‘Errata Lists and the Reader as Corrector’, in Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies after Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, ed. by Baron, Sabrina A., Lindquist, Eric N., and Shevlin, Eleanor F. (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007), pp. 21–41.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann ‘Reflections on Technological Continuities: Manuscripts Copied from Printed Books’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 91.1 (2015), 7–33.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann ‘The Rise of Note-Taking in Early Modern Europe’, Intellectual History Review, 20.3 (2010), 303–16.Google Scholar
Blake, N.F., ‘The Textual Tradition of The Book of the Duchess’, English Studies, 62.3 (1981), 237–48.Google Scholar
Blake, N.F., William Caxton and English Literary Culture (London: Hambledon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Blamires, Alcuin, Pratt, Karen, and William Marx, C., eds. Woman Defamed and Woman Defended: An Anthology of Medieval Texts (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Blodgett, James E. ‘William Thynne (d. 1546)’, in Editing Chaucer: The Great Tradition, ed. by Ruggiers, Paul G. (Norman, OK: Pilgrim Books, 1984), pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Bock, Oliver. ‘C. Maier’s Use of a Reagent in the Vercelli Book’, The Library, 16.3 (2015), 249–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boffey, Julia. ‘From Manuscript to Print: Continuity and Change’, in A Companion to the Early Printed Book in Britain 1476–1558, ed. by Gillespie, Vincent and Powell, Susan (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2014), pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
Boffey, Julia Manuscript and Print in London: c. 1475–1530 (London: British Library, 2012).Google Scholar
Boffey, Julia ‘Proverbial Chaucer and the Chaucer Canon’, HLQ, 58.1 (1995), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boffey, Julia ‘The Reputation and Circulation of Chaucer’s Lyrics in the Fifteenth Century’, ChR, 28.1 (1993), 23–40.Google Scholar
Boffey, Julia and Edwards, A. S. G.. ‘“Chaucer’s Chronicle,” John Shirley, and the Canon of Chaucer’s Shorter Poems’, SAC, 20.1 (1998), 201–18.Google Scholar
Boffey, Julia and Edwards, A. S. G. and Edwards, A. S. G., eds. New Index of Middle English Verse (London: British Library, 2005).Google Scholar
Boffey, Julia and Edwards, A. S. G. and Edwards, A. S. G.. ‘The Early Reception of Chaucer’s The House of Fame’, in Chaucer and Fame: Reputation and Reception, ed. by Davis, Isabel and Nall, Catherine (Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, 2015), pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
Boswell, Jackson Campbell. ‘New References to Chaucer, 1641–1660’, ChR, 45.4 (2011), 435–65.Google Scholar
Boswell, Jackson Campbell and Wallace Holton, Sylvia. ‘References to Chaucer’s Literary Reputation’, ChR, 31.3 (1997), 291–316.Google Scholar
Bowers, John M. The Canterbury Tales: Fifteenth-Century Continuations and Additions (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 1992).Google Scholar
Boyd, Beverly. ‘Hoccleve’s Miracle of the Virgin’, The University of Texas Studies in English, 35 (1956), 116–22.Google Scholar
Brae, A. E., ed. The Treatise on the Astrolabe Edited with Notes and Illustrations (London: John Russell Smith, 1870).Google Scholar
Brayman Hackel, Heidi. Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Bremmer Jr, Rolf H. ‘Franciscus Junius Reads Chaucer: But Why? And How?’, in Appropriating the Middle Ages: Scholarship, Politics, Fraud, ed. by Shippey, Tom and Arnold, Martin, Studies in Medievalism, X1 (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2001), pp. 37–72.Google Scholar
Brewer, Derek. Geoffrey Chaucer: The Critical Heritage, 2 vols. (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Briquet, C. M. Les Filigranes: Dictionnaire Historique Des Marques Du Papier Dès Leur Apparition Vers 1282 Jusqu’en 1600, ed. by Stevenson, A. H. (Amsterdam: Paper Publications Society, 1968).Google Scholar
Brown, Carleton, and Robbins, Rossell Hope, eds. Index of Middle English Verse (New York: Printed for the Index Society by Columbia University Press, 1943), and its Supplement, ed. by Rossell Hope Robbins and John L. Cutler (1965).Google Scholar
Brown, Meaghan J. ‘Addresses to the Reader’, in Book Parts, ed. by Duncan, Dennis and Smyth, Adam (Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 81–93.Google Scholar
Budny, Mildred. Insular, Anglo-Saxon, and Early Anglo-Norman Manuscript Art at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge: An Illustrated Catalogue, 2 vols. (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University in association with Research Group on Manuscript Evidence, the Parker Library, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. ‘Reflections on the Frontispiece Portrait in the Renaissance’, in Bildnis und Image: Das Portrait Zwischen Intention und Rezeption, ed. by Kostler, Andreas and Seidl, Ernst (Köln: Böhlau, 1998), pp. 150–62.Google Scholar
Byrom, H. J. ‘Richard Tottell – His Life and Work’, The Library, 4th ser., 8.2 (1927), 199–232.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Robert A. ‘An Elizabethan Chaucer Glossary’, Modern Language Notes, 58.5 (1943), 374–5.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Robert A. ‘Joseph Holand, Collector and Antiquary’, Modern Philology, 40.4 (1943), 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Robert A. ‘The “History of the Kings of Britain” in College of Arms Ms. Arundel XXII’, PMLA, 69.3 (1954), 643–54.Google Scholar
Calè, Luisa. ‘Frontispieces’, in Book Parts, ed. by Duncan, Dennis and Smyth, Adam (Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
Callander, David. ‘Troelus a Chressyd: A Translation of the Welsh Adaptation of Troilus and Criseyde’, National Library of Wales Journal, 37.2 (2019), 15–73.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher. The Making of Chaucer’s English: A Study of Words (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
‘Canterbury Tales’, The Huntington Digital Library, https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/iiif/p15150coll7/2829/full/full/0/default.jpg.Google Scholar
Carlson, David R. ‘Thomas Hoccleve and the Chaucer Portrait’, HLQ, 54.4 (1991), 283–300.Google Scholar
Carron, Helen. ‘William Sancroft (1617–93): A Seventeenth-Century Collector and His Library’, The Library, 1.3 (2000), 290–307.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Eric, comp. Catalogue of the Pepys Library at Magdalene College, Cambridge. Vol. 111 Part 2: Prints and Drawings Portraits (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 1994).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, ed. by Skeat, Walter W. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey The Riverside Chaucer, ed. by Benson, Larry D., 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey Troilus and Criseyde, ed. by Windeatt, Barry (London: Longman, 1984).Google Scholar
Cloud, Random. ‘The Marriage of Good and Bad Quartos’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 33.3 (1982), 421–31.Google Scholar
Connolly, Margaret. ‘Compiling the Book’, in The Production of Books in England 1350–1500, ed. by Gillespie, Alexandra and Wakelin, Daniel (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 129–49.Google Scholar
Connolly, Margaret ‘Late Medieval Books of Hours and Their Early Tudor Readers in and around London’, in Manuscript and Print in Late Medieval and Early Modern Britain: Essays in Honour of Professor Julia Boffey, ed. by Atkin, Tamara and Rajsic, Jaclyn (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 2019), pp. 107–21.Google Scholar
Connolly, Margaret ‘Reading Late Medieval Devotional Compilations in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries’, in Late Medieval Devotional Compilations in England, ed. by Cré, Marleen, Denissen, Diana, and Renevey, Denis (Turnhout: Brepols, 2020), pp. 131–56.Google Scholar
Connolly, Margaret Sixteenth-Century Readers, Fifteenth-Century Books: Continuities of Reading in the English Reformation (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Connolly, Margaret ‘What John Shirley Said About Adam: Authorship and Attribution in Cambridge, Trinity College, MS R.3.20’, in The Dynamics of the Medieval Manuscript: Text Collections from a European Perspective, ed. by Pratt, Karen, Besamusca, Bart, Meyer, Matthias, and Putter, Ad (Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2017), pp. 81–100.Google Scholar
Connor, Francis X. Literary Folios and Ideas of the Book in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Cook, Megan L. ‘Author, Text, and Paratext in Early Modern Editions of the Legend of Good Women’, ChR, 52.1 (2017), 124–42.Google Scholar
Cook, Megan L. ‘“Here Taketh the Makere of This Book His Leve”: The Retraction and Chaucer’s Works in Tudor England’, Studies in Philology, 113.1 (2016), 32–54.Google Scholar
Cook, Megan L. ‘Joseph Holland and the Idea of the Chaucerian Book’, Manuscript Studies: A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies, 1.2 (2016), 165–88.Google Scholar
Cook, Megan L. The Poet and the Antiquaries: Chaucerian Scholarship and the Rise of Literary History, 1532–1635 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen. ‘Chaucerian Representation’, in New Readings of Chaucer’s Poetry, ed. by Benson, Robert G. and Ridyard, Susan J. (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2003), pp. 7–29.Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen ‘Choosing Poetic Fathers: The English Problem’, Medieval and Early Modern Authorship, SPELL: Swiss papers in English language and literature, 25 (2011), 29–50.Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen ‘Poetic Fame’, in Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History, ed. by Cummings, Brian and Simpson, James (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 361–78.Google Scholar
Cooper, Tarnya, and Hadfield, Andrew. ‘Edmund Spenser and Elizabethan Portraiture’, Renaissance Studies, 27.3 (2013), 407–34.Google Scholar
Crick, Julia, and Walsham, Alexandra. ‘Introduction: Script, Print and History’, in The Uses of Script and Print, 1300–1700, ed. by Crick, Julia and Walsham, Alexandra (Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Crocker, Holly A. The Matter of Virtue: Women’s Ethical Action from Chaucer to Shakespeare (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019).Google Scholar
D’Ewes, Simonds. The Autobiography and Correspondence of Sir Simonds D’Ewes, Bart., during the Reigns of James I and Charles I, ed. by J.O. Halliwell, 2 vols. (London: Richard Bentley, 1845).Google Scholar
de Bury, Richard. Philobiblon, trans. by Ernest Chester Thomas (Oxford: Published for the Shakespeare Head Press by B. Blackwell, 1970).Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph A. ‘Bibliographical History Versus Bibliographical Evidence: The Plowman’s Tale and Early Chaucer Editions’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 78.1 (1996), 47–62.Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph A. ‘Fists and Filiations in Early Chaucer Folios, 1532–1602’, Studies in Bibliography, 51 (1998), 48–62.Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph A. ‘“Tyl Mercurius House He Flye”: Early Printed Texts and Critical Readings of the “Squire’s Tale”’, ChR, 34.3 (2000), 309–16.Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph A. Who Is Buried in Chaucer’s Tomb? Studies in the Reception of Chaucer’s Book (Michigan State University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph A. and Gillespie, Alexandra. ‘Back at Chaucer’s Tomb – Inscriptions in Two Early Copies of Chaucer’s “Workes”’, Studies in Bibliography, 52 (1999), 89–96.Google Scholar
Davies, Martin, ed. Incunabula: Studies in Fifteenth-Century Books Presented to Lotte Hellinga (London: British Library, 1999).Google Scholar
Davis, Norman. ‘Chaucer’s Gentilesse: A Forgotten Manuscript, with Some Proverbs’, RES, 20.77 (1969), 43–50.Google Scholar
de Hamel, Christopher. Cutting up Manuscripts for Pleasure and Profit (Charlottesville: Book Arts Press, 1996).Google Scholar
de Ricci, Seymour, ed. A Census of Caxtons (Bibliographical Society at Oxford University Press, 1909).Google Scholar
DeCoursey, Christina. ‘Society of Antiquaries’, ODNB, https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/72906.Google Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn How Soon Is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers, and the Queerness of Time (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dobranski, Stephen B. Readers and Authorship in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael. ‘Whatever you do, buy’, London Review of Books, 23.22 (15 November 2001), www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v23/n22/michael-dobson/whatever-you-do-buy.Google Scholar
Doyle, A. I. ‘The Cosin Manuscripts and George Davenport’, The Book Collector, 53 (2004), 32–45.Google Scholar
Drimmer, Sonja. ‘A Medieval Psalter “Perfected”: Eighteenth-Century Conservationism and an Early (Female) Restorer of Rare Books and Manuscripts’, British Library Journal, Article 3 (2013), 1–38.Google Scholar
Driver, Martha W. ‘Mapping Chaucer: John Speed and the Later Portraits’, ChR, 36.3 (2002), 228–49.Google Scholar
Driver, Martha W. ‘Stow’s Books Bequeathed: Some Notes on William Browne (1591–c. 1643) and Peter Le Neve (1661–1729)’, in John Stow (1525–1605) and the Making of the English Past, ed. by Gadd, Ian and Gillespie, Alexandra (London: British Library, 2004), pp. 135–43.Google Scholar
Durham University Library Archives & Special Collections Catalogue, ‘Durham University Library Cosin MS. V.ii.14’, http://reed.dur.ac.uk/xtf/view?docId=ark/32150_s1kp78gg42d.xml.Google Scholar
EarlyPrint Lab, ‘Corpus Search’, https://eplab.artsci.wustl.edu/corpus-frontend-1.2/eebotcp/search/.Google Scholar
Early English Books Online, quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebogroup/.Google Scholar
Echard, Siân. ‘Containing the Book: The Institutional Afterlives of Medieval Manuscripts’, in The Medieval Manuscript Book: Cultural Approaches, ed. by Johnston, Michael and Van Dussen, Michael (Cambridge University Press 2015), pp. 96–118.Google Scholar
Echard, Siân ‘Gower Between Manuscript and Print’, in John Gower in Manuscripts and Early Printed Books, ed. by Driver, Martha, Pearsall, Derek, and Yeager, R. F. (Cambridge: Boydell & Brewer, 2020), pp. 169–88.Google Scholar
Echard, Siân ‘Pre-Texts: Tables of Contents and the Reading of John Gower’s “Confessio Amantis”’, Medium Ævum, 66.2 (1997), 270–87.Google Scholar
Echard, Siân Printing the Middle Ages (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G. ‘Chaucer from Manuscript to Print: The Social Text and the Critical Text’, Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 28.4 (1995), 1–12.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G. ‘Decorated Caxtons’, in Incunabula: Studies in Fifteenth-Century Books Presented to Lotte Hellinga, ed. by Davies, Martin (London: British Library, 1999), pp. 493–506.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G. ‘John Stow and Middle English Literature’, in John Stow (1525–1605) and the Making of the English Past, ed. by Gadd, Ian and Gillespie, Alexandra (London: British Library, 2004), pp. 109–18.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G. ‘Medieval Manuscripts Owned by William Browne of Tavistock (1590/1?–1643/5)’, in Books and Collectors, 1200–1700: Essays for Andrew Watson, ed. by Carley, James P. and Tite, Colin G. C (London: British Library, 1997), pp. 441–9.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G. ‘Sir James Ware, the Collecting of Middle English Manuscripts in Ireland in the Seventeenth Century, and Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales’, ChR, 46.1 (2011), 237–47.Google Scholar
‘The Canterbury Tales and Gamelyn’, in Medieval Latin and Middle English Literature: Essays in Honour of Jill Mann, ed. by Cannon, Christopher and Nolan, Maura (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2011), pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change (Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
English Short Title Catalogue, http://estc.bl.uk/.Google Scholar
Ensley, Mimi. ‘Framing Chaucer’s Plowman’, The Yearbook of Langland Studies, 32 (2018), 333–51.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Adage II.i.1, Adages: II i 1 to II vi 100, trans. by R. A. B. Mynors, Collected Works of Erasmus, 33 (University of Toronto Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Erler, Mary C. ‘Pasted-In Embellishments in English Manuscripts and Printed Books c. 1480–1533’, The Library, 6th ser., 14.3 (1992), 185–206.Google Scholar
Erler, Mary C. ‘Printers’ Copy: MS Bodley 638 and the “Parliament of Fowls”’, ChR, 33.3 (1999), 221–9.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas and Singh, Devani, eds. Bel-vedére or the Garden of the Muses: An Early Modern Printed Commonplace Book (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Espie, Jeff. ‘Spenser, Chaucer, and the Renaissance Squire’s Tale’, Spenser Studies, 33 (2019), 133–60.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura. Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts: Watching, Reading, Changing Plays (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Evans, Robert C. ‘Ben Jonson’s Chaucer’, English Literary Renaissance, 19.3 (1989), 324–45.Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet. ‘Afterword: The Textuality and Materiality of Reading in Early Modern England’, HLQ, 73.3 (2010), 543–52.Google Scholar
Forni, Kathleen. ‘“Chaucer’s Dreame”: A Bibliographer’s Nightmare’, HLQ, 64.1/2 (2001), 139–50.Google Scholar
Forni, Kathleen The Chaucerian Apocrypha: A Counterfeit Canon (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2001).Google Scholar
Forni, Kathleen ed. The Chaucerian Apocrypha: A Selection (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2005).Google Scholar
Foster, Richard. ‘Robert Hedrington and Wynkyn de Worde at Winchester College’, New College Notes, 7 (2016), 1–5.Google Scholar
Fox, Denton. ‘Manuscripts and Prints of Scots Poetry in the Sixteenth Century’, in Bards and Makars, ed. by Aitken, A. J., McDiarmid, Matthew P., and Thomson, Derick S. (University of Glasgow Press, 1977), pp. 156–71.Google Scholar
Fragmentarium: Laboratory for Medieval Manuscript Fragments, https://fragmentarium.ms.Google Scholar
Furnivall, Frederick J., ed. John Lane’s Continuation of Chaucer’s ‘Squire’s Tale’ (Pub. for the Chaucer Society by K. Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1888).Google Scholar
Gaskell, Philip. Trinity College Library: The First 150 Years, Sandars Lectures, 1978 (Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Gaskell, Roger. ‘Printing House and Engraving Shop: A Mysterious Collaboration’, The Book Collector, 53 (2004), 213–51.Google Scholar
Gatch, Milton McC. ‘John Bagford as a Collector and Disseminator of Manuscript Fragments’, The Library, 6th ser. 7.2 (1985), 95–114.Google Scholar
Gatch, Milton McC ‘John Bagford, Bookseller and Antiquary’, British Library Journal, 12 (1986), 150–71.Google Scholar
Gaylord, Alan T. ‘Portrait of a Poet’, in The Ellesmere Chaucer: Essays in Interpretation, ed. by Stevens, Martin and Woodward, D. H. (San Marino: Huntington Library, 1995), pp. 121–38.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Victoria. ‘The Manuscript Titles of Truth: Titology and the Medieval Gap’, JEBS, 11 (2008), 198–206.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra. ‘Caxton’s Chaucer and Lydgate Quartos: Miscellanies from Manuscript to Print’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 12.1 (2000), 1–25.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra ‘Introduction’, in John Stow (1525–1605) and the Making of the English Past, ed. by Gadd, Ian and Gillespie, Alexandra (London: British Library, 2004), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra Print Culture and the Medieval Author: Chaucer, Lydgate, and Their Books 1473–1557 (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra ‘Turk’s-Head Knots’, in The Unfinished Book, ed. by Gillespie, Alexandra and Lynch, Deidre (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 201–18.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra and Lynch, Deidre. ‘Introduction’, in The Unfinished Book, ed. by Gillespie, Alexandra and Lynch, Deidre (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Vincent, and Doyle, A. I., eds. Syon Abbey, with the Libraries of the Carthusians. Corpus of British Medieval Library Catalogues, 1x (London: British Library in association with the British Academy, 2001).Google Scholar
Gillhammer, Cosima Clara. ‘Fifteenth-Century Compilation Methods: The Case of Oxford, Trinity College, MS 29’, RES, 73.308 (2022), 20–41.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony ‘Scaliger’s Collation of the Codex Pithoei of Censorinus’, Bodleian Library Record, 11.6 (1985), 406–8.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony The Culture of Correction in Renaissance Europe (London: British Library, 2011).Google Scholar
Griffiths, Antony. The Print in Stuart Britain, 1603–1689 (London: Published for the Trustees of the British Museum by British Museum Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jane. ‘What’s in a Name? The Transmission of “John Skelton, Laureate” in Manuscript and Print’, HLQ, 67.2 (2004), 215–35.Google Scholar
Hammond, Eleanor Prescott. Chaucer: A Bibliographical Manual (New York: Macmillan Co., 1908).Google Scholar
Harbus, Antonina. ‘A Renaissance Reader’s English Annotations to Thynne’s 1532 Edition of Chaucer’s Works’, RES, 59.240 (2008), 342–55.Google Scholar
Harrier, Richard C. ‘A Printed Source for “The Devonshire Manuscript”’, RES, 11.41 (1960), 54.Google Scholar
Harris, Jonathan Gil. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Hawes, Stephen. The Pastime of Pleasure, ed. by Mead, William Edward (London: Published for the Early English Text Society by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Heawood, Edward. Watermarks: Mainly of the 17th and 18th Centuries (Hilversum, Holland: Paper Publications Society, 1950).Google Scholar
Henderson, T. F., and Woolf, D. R.. ‘Barkham, John (1571/2–1642), antiquary and historian’, ODNB, https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/1421.Google Scholar
Herrick, Robert. The Complete Poetry of Robert Herrick, ed. by Cain, Tom and Connolly, Ruth (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Higl, Andrew. Playing the Canterbury Tales: The Continuations and Additions (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Hind, Arthur M. Engraving in England in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: A Descriptive Catalogue with Introductions. Part 1, The Tudor Period. (Cambridge University Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Hindman, Sandra, Camille, Michael, Rowe, Nina, and Watson, Rowan. Manuscript Illumination in the Modern Age: Recovery and Reconstruction (Evanston, IL: Mary and Leigh Block Museum of Art, Northwestern University, 2001).Google Scholar
Hinnie, Lucy R. ‘Bannatyne’s Chaucer: A Triptych of Influence’, ChR, 55.4 (2020), 484–99.Google Scholar
Hoccleve, Thomas. The Regiment of Princes, ed. by Blyth, Charles R. (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 1999).Google Scholar
Horobin, Simon. ‘Stephan Batman and His Manuscripts of “Piers Plowman”’, RES, 62.255 (2011), 358–72.Google Scholar
Howe, Sarah. ‘The Authority of Presence: The Development of the English Author Portrait, 1500–1640’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 102.4 (2008), 465–99.Google Scholar
Hudson, Anne. ‘John Stow (1525?–1605)’ in Editing Chaucer: The Great Tradition, ed. by Ruggiers, Paul G. (Norman, OK: Pilgrim Books, 1984), pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
Irvine, Annie S. ‘A Manuscript Copy of “The Plowman’s Tale”’, Studies in English, 12 (1932), 27–56.Google Scholar
Jajdelska, Elspeth. ‘Pepys in the History of Reading’, The Historical Journal, 50.3 (2007), 549–69.Google Scholar
James, Kathryn. English Paleography and Manuscript Culture, 1500–1800 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa, and Grafton, Anthony. ‘“Studied for Action”: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’, Past & Present, 129 (1990), 30–78.Google Scholar
Jensen, Kristian. Revolution and the Antiquarian Book: Reshaping the Past, 1780–1815 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Johnston, Hope. ‘Readers’ Memorials in Early Editions of Chaucer’, Studies in Bibliography, 59.1 (2015), 45–69.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael, and Van Dussen, Michael. ‘Introduction’, in The Medieval Manuscript Book: Cultural Approaches, ed. by Johnston, Michael and Van Dussen, Michael (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Discoveries, in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson, ed. by Bevington, David, Butler, Martin, and Donaldson, Ian, 7 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Jordan, David A. ‘An Object Lesson in Collecting: Stanford’s Inscrutable Portrait of Chaucer’, ReMix, 15 December 2011, http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/260487/835711a532/ARCHIVE.Google Scholar
Kelen, Sarah A. Langland’s Early Modern Identities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar
Ker, N. R. ‘Archbishop Sancroft’s Rearrangement of the Manuscripts of Lambeth Palace’, in A Catalogue of Manuscripts in Lambeth Palace Library. MSS. 1222–1860: With a Supplement to M. R. James’s ‘Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Lambeth Palace’ by N. R. Ker, ed. by Bill, E. G. W. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
Ker, N. R. ed. Medieval Manuscripts in British Libraries, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969–92).Google Scholar
Kerling, Johan. Chaucer in Early English Dictionaries: The Old-Word Tradition in English Lexicography down to 1721 and Speght’s Chaucer Glossaries (Leiden University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter. Shakespeare and the Idea of Apocrypha: Negotiating the Boundaries of the Dramatic Canon (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd. Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaissance Literature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Knox, Philip, Poole, William, and Griffith, Mark. ‘Reading Chaucer in New College, Oxford, in the 1630s: The Commendatory Verses to Francis Kynaston’s Amorum Troili et Creseidæ’, Medium Ævum, 85 (2016), 33–58.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, Erik. ‘Wearing a Book’, Erik Kwakkel, https://erikkwakkel.tumblr.com/post/88698949876/wearing-a-book-books-are-objects-to-read-from.Google Scholar
Lambeth Palace Library. ‘Research Guide – Library Records 1610–1785, Part B’, https://lambethpalacelibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/37/2021/06/Research-Guide-Library-Records-1610-1785-part-B.pdf.Google Scholar
Latham, Robert Gordon, and Armstrong, William A., eds. The Diary of Samuel Pepys: A New and Complete Transcription. Vol. 4: 1663 (London: Harper Collins, 2000).Google Scholar
Leahy, Conor. ‘An Annotated Edition of Chaucer Belonging to Stephan Batman’, The Library, 22.2 (2021), 217–24.Google Scholar
Leishman, James B., ed. The Three Parnassus Plays (1598–1601) (London: Nicholson and Watson, 1949).Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth. Chaucer and His Readers: Imagining the Author in Late-Medieval England (Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth Courtly Letters in the Age of Henry v111: Literary Culture and the Arts of Deceit (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth ‘Devotion and Defacement: Reading Children’s Marginalia’, Representations, 118.1 (2012), 126–53.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth Error and the Academic Self: The Scholarly Imagination, Medieval to Modern (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth ‘Medieval English Literature and the Idea of the Anthology’, PMLA, 118.5 (2003), 1251–67.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. ‘Typographic Nostalgia: Playreading, Popularity and the Meanings of Black Letter’, in The Book of the Play: Playwrights, Stationers, and Readers in Early Modern England, ed. by Straznicky, Marta (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2006), pp. 99–126.Google Scholar
Lewis, Hope. ‘Between Irua and Female Genital Mutilation: Feminist Human Rights Discourse and the Cultural Divide’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 8 (1995), 1–56.Google Scholar
Loveman, Kate. ‘Books and Sociability: The Case of Samuel Pepys’s Library’, RES, 61.249 (2010), 214–33.Google Scholar
LUNA Folger Digital Image Collection, ‘Note concerning the purchase of a book from the bookseller Francis Smethwicke’, https://luna.folger.edu/luna/servlet/s/u4pq95.Google Scholar
Machan, Tim William. ‘Speght’s “Works” and the Invention of Chaucer’, Text, 8 (1995), 145–70.Google Scholar
Machan, Tim William. Textual Criticism and Middle English Texts (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994).Google Scholar
Malay, Jessica. ‘Reassessing Anne Clifford’s Books: The Discovery of a New Manuscript Inventory’, The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 115.1 (2021), 1–41.Google Scholar
Manly, John Matthews, and Rickert, Edith, eds. The Text of the Canterbury Tales: Studied on the Basis of All Known Manuscripts, 8 vols. (University of Chicago Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric (Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Matthews, David. ‘Public Ambition, Private Desire, and the Last Tudor Chaucer’, in Reading the Medieval in Early Modern England, ed. by McMullan, Gordon and Matthews, David (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 74–88.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jean-Christophe. Shakespeare’s Early Readers: A Cultural History from 1590 to 1800 (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. ‘Printers of the Mind: Some Notes on Bibliographical Theories and Printing-House Practices’, Studies in Bibliography, 22 (1969), 1–75.Google Scholar
McKerrow, Ronald B. An Introduction to Bibliography for Literary Students (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927; repr. Winchester: St. Paul’s Bibliographies, 1994).Google Scholar
McKerrow, Ronald B. ‘Notes on Bibliographical Evidence for Literary Students and Editors of English Works of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, The Library, TBS-12.1 (1913), 213–318.Google Scholar
McKerrow, Ronald B. and Ferguson, F. S.. Title-Page Borders Used in England & Scotland, 1485–1640 (London: Bibliographical Society, 1932).Google Scholar
McKitterick, David. Old Books, New Technologies: The Representation, Conservation and Transformation of Books since 1700 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McKitterick, David ‘“Ovid with a Littleton”: The Cost of English Books in the Early Seventeenth Century’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 11.2 (1997), 184–234.Google Scholar
McKitterick, David Print, Manuscript, and the Search for Order, 1450–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
McKitterick, David The Invention of Rare Books: Private Interest and Public Memory, 1600–1840 (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
McKitterick, Rosamond, and Whalley, Joyce Irene. ‘Calligraphy’, in Catalogue of the Pepys Library at Magdalene College, Cambridge, Vol. 1v: Music, Maps and Calligraphy, comp. John Stevens, Sarah Tyacke, and Rosamond D. McKitterick (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 1989).Google Scholar
Minnis, Alastair. Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., Mosser, Daniel W., Solopova, Elizabeth, Thorpe, Deborah, Radcliffe, David Hill, and Hatfield, Len, eds. Digital Index of Middle English Verse, based on the Index of Middle English Verse (1943) and its Supplement (1965), www.dimev.net.Google Scholar
Moore Smith, G. C. Gabriel Harvey’s Marginalia (Stratford-upon-Avon: Shakespeare Head Press, 1913).Google Scholar
Mosser, Daniel. ‘Tc2’, A Digital Catalogue of the Pre-1500 Manuscripts and Incunables of the Canterbury Tales, www.mossercatalogue.net/.Google Scholar
Moxon, Joseph. Moxon’s Mechanick Exercises, or, The Doctrine of Handyworks Applied to the Art of Printing, ed. by De Vinne, Theodore Low, 2 vols. (New York: Typothetæ of the City of New York, 1896).Google Scholar
Mullinger, J. B., and Lehmberg, Stanford. ‘Neville [Nevile], Thomas (c. 1548–1615), college head and dean of Canterbury’, ODNB, https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/19965.Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy. Archaic Style in English Literature, 1590–1674 (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 86–91.Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy ‘“O Read Me for I Am of Great Antiquity”: Old Books and Elizabethan Popularity’, in The Elizabethan Top Ten: Defining Print Popularity in Early Modern England, ed. by Kesson, Andy and Smith, Emma (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
Nafde, Aditi. ‘Gower from Print to Manuscript: Copying Caxton in Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Hatton 51’, in John Gower in Manuscripts and Early Printed Books, ed. by Driver, Martha, Pearsall, Derek, and Yeager, R. F. (Cambridge: Boydell & Brewer, 2020), pp. 189–200.Google Scholar
Nafde, Aditi ‘Replicating the Mechanical Print Aesthetic in Manuscripts before circa 1500’, Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures, 9.2 (2020), 120–44.Google Scholar
Nagy, Andrea R. ‘Defining English: Authenticity and Standardization in Seventeenth-Century Dictionaries’, Studies in Philology, 96.4 (1999), 439–56.Google Scholar
Niebrzydowski, Sue. ‘“Ye Know Eek That in Forme of Speche Is Change”: Chaucer, Henryson, and the Welsh Troelus a Chresyd’, Medieval English Theatre 38: The Best Pairt of Our Play. Essays Presented to John J. McGavin. Part 11, ed. by Meg Twycross, Pamela M. King, Sarah Carpenter, and Walker, Greg (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2017), pp. 38–56.Google Scholar
Nixon, Howard M., ed. Catalogue of the Pepys Library at Magdalene College, Cambridge, Vol. v1: Bindings (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 1984).Google Scholar
North, Marcy L. The Anonymous Renaissance: Cultures of Discretion in Tudor-Stuart England (University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, Michelle. The ‘Shepheard’s Nation’: Jacobean Spenserians and Early Stuart Political Culture, 1612–25 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).Google Scholar
O’Connell, Brendan. ‘Putting the Plowman in His Place: Order and Genre in the Early Modern Canterbury Tales’, ChR, 53.4 (2018), 428–48.Google Scholar
Oates, J. C. T. Catalogue of the Pepys Library at Magdalene College, Cambridge, Vol 1: Printed Books, ed. by Smith, N. A. (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 1978).Google Scholar
Old Books New Science Lab, ‘John Stow’s Books’, https://oldbooksnewscience.com/aboutobns/lab-projects/.Google Scholar
Olson, Jonathan R. ‘“Newly Amended and Much Enlarged”: Claims of Novelty and Enlargement on the Title Pages of Reprints in the Early Modern English Book Trade’, History of European Ideas, 42.5 (2016), 618–28.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. ‘Not on His Picture but His Book’, Times Literary Supplement, 2003, 9–10.Google Scholar
Ovenden, Richard. Burning the Books: A History of the Deliberate Destruction of Knowledge (London: John Murray, 2020).Google Scholar
Ovenden, Richard ‘The Libraries of the Antiquaries (c. 1580–1640) and the Idea of a National Collection’, in The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland, ed. by Leedham-Green, Elisabeth S. and Webber, Teresa (Cambridge University Press, 2008), I, pp. 527–62.Google Scholar
Ovidius Naso, Publius. Metamorphoses: Books 1–v111, trans. by George P. Goold and Frank Justus Miller, Loeb Classical Library, 42, 3rd ed., 2 vols. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, www.oxforddnb.com.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, www.oed.com.Google Scholar
Oxfordshire Family History Society, ‘Garbrand HARCKS of Oxford’, http://wills.oxfordshirefhs.org.uk/az/wtext/harkes_001.html.Google Scholar
Pace, George B. ‘Speght’s Chaucer and MS. GG.4.27’, Studies in Bibliography, 21 (1968), 225–35.Google Scholar
Page, R. I. Matthew Parker and His Books: Sandars Lectures in Bibliography (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications and Parker Library, 1993).Google Scholar
Page, R. I. ‘The Transcription of Old English Texts in the Sixteenth Century’, in Care and Conservation of Manuscripts 7, ed. by Fellows-Jensen, G. and Springborg, P. (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2003), pp. 179–90.Google Scholar
Panayotova, Stella. ‘Cuttings from an Unknown Copy of the Magna Glossatura in a Wycliffite Bible (British Library, Arundel MS. 104)’, British Library Journal, 25 (1999), 85–100.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B. ‘Archaizing Hands in English Manuscripts’, in Pages from the Past: Medieval Writing Skills and Manuscript Books, ed. by Robinson, P. R. (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), pp. 101–41.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B. ‘Stephen Batman’s Manuscripts’, in Medieval Heritage: Essays in Honour of Tadahiro Ikegami, ed. by Kanno, Masahiko, Yamashita, Hiroshi, Kawasaki, Masatoshi, Asakawa, Junko, and Shirai, Naoko (Tokyo: Yushodo Press Co., 1997), pp. 125–56.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B. and Beadle, Richard, eds. The Poetical Works of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Facsimile of Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27, 3 vols. (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1979).Google Scholar
Partington, Gill, and Smyth, Adam, eds. Book Destruction from the Medieval to the Contemporary (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Pask, Kevin. The Emergence of the English Author: Scripting the Life of the Poet in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee W. ‘The “Parson’s Tale” and the Quitting of the “Canterbury Tales”’, Traditio, 34 (1978), 331–80.Google Scholar
Patterson, Paul J. ‘Reforming Chaucer: Margins and Religion in an Apocryphal Canterbury Tale’, Book History, 8.1 (2005), 11–36.Google Scholar
Pearman, Tory Vandeventer. Women and Disability in Medieval Literature (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek. ‘John Stow and Thomas Speght as Editors of Chaucer: A Question of Class’, in John Stow (1525–1605) and the Making of the English Past, ed. by Gadd, Ian and Gillespie, Alexandra (London: British Library, 2004), pp. 119–25.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Critical Biography (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek ‘Thomas Speght (ca. 1550–?)’, in Editing Chaucer: The Great Tradition, ed. by Ruggiers, Paul G. (Norman, OK: Pilgrim Books, 1984), pp. 71–92.Google Scholar
Peltz, Lucy. ‘Facing the Text: The Amateur and Commercial Histories of Extra-Illustration, c. 1770–1840’, in Owners, Annotators, and the Signs of Reading, ed. by Myers, Robin, Harris, Michael, and Mandelbrote, Giles, Publishing Pathways (New Castle, DE; London: Oak Knoll; British Library, 2005), pp. 91–135.Google Scholar
Perry, Ryan. ‘The Sum of the Book: Structural Codicology and Medieval Manuscript Culture’, in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval British Manuscripts, ed. by Treharne, Elaine and Da Rold, Orietta (Cambridge University Press, 2020), pp. 106–26.Google Scholar
Philip, Ian G. The Bodleian Library in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, The Lyell Lectures, Oxford, 1980–1 (Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Pickwoad, Nicholas. ‘The Use of Fragments of Medieval Manuscripts in the Construction and Covering of Bindings on Printed Books’, in Interpreting and Collecting Fragments of Medieval Books, ed. by Brownrigg, Linda L. and Smith, Margaret M. (London: Red Gull Press, 2000), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Plantin, Christophe. Calligraphy & Printing in the Sixteenth Century: Dialogue Attributed to Christopher Plantin in French and Flemish Facsimile, ed. by Nash, Ray (Antwerp: Plantin-Moretus Museum, 1964).Google Scholar
Pollard, A. W., and Redgrave, G. R.. A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland and Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad, 1475–1640, 2nd ed. rev. & enl., begun by Jackson, W. A. & Ferguson, F. S., compl. by Katharine F. Pantzer, 2 vols (London: Bibliographical Society, 1976).Google Scholar
Pratt, Aaron T., and James, Kathryn. Collated and Perfect (West Haven, CT: GHP, 2019), https://hrc.utexas.edu/collections/early-books-and-manuscripts/pdf/Collated-and-Perfect.pdf.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Thomas. Chaucer’s Dead Body: From Corpse to Corpus (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Ransom, Daniel J. ‘Speght’s Jape: A Word History and an Editor at Work’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 118.4 (2019), 517–43.Google Scholar
Remmert, Volker R. ‘“Docet Parva Pictura, Quod Multae Scripturae Non Dicunt.” Frontispieces, Their Functions, and Their Audiences in Seventeenth-Century Mathematical Sciences’, in Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images, and Instruments in Early Modern Europe, ed. by Kusukawa, Sachiko and Maclean, Ian (Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 239–70.Google Scholar
Ringler, William. ‘John Stow’s Editions of Skelton’s “Workes” and of “Certaine Worthye Manuscript Poems”’, Studies in Bibliography, 8 (1956), 215–17.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. Julian. ‘James, Thomas (1572/3– 1629), librarian and religious controversialist’, ODNB, https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/14619.Google Scholar
Robinson, Pamela, ed. Manuscript Tanner 346: A Facsimile (Norman, OK, Suffolk, UK:Pilgrim Books; Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, 1980).Google Scholar
Rollins, Hyder E. ‘The Troilus-Cressida Story from Chaucer to Shakespeare’, PMLA, 32.3 (1917), 383–429.Google Scholar
Rudy, Kathryn M. Image, Knife, and Gluepot: Early Assemblage in Manuscript and Print (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2019).Google Scholar
Rudy, Kathryn M. Piety in Pieces: How Medieval Readers Customized Their Manuscripts (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2016).Google Scholar
Ruggiers, Paul G., ed. Editing Chaucer: The Great Tradition (Norman, OK: Pilgrim Books, 1984).Google Scholar
Ryley, Hannah. ‘Constructive Parchment Destruction in Medieval Manuscripts’, Book 2.0, 7.1 (2017), 9–19.Google Scholar
Ryley, Hannah Re-Using Manuscripts in Late Medieval England: Repairing, Recycling, Sharing (York Medieval Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Sae, Kitamura. ‘A Shakespeare of One’s Own: Female Users of Playbooks from the Seventeenth to the Mid-Eighteenth Century’, Palgrave Communications, 3.1 (2017), 1–9.Google Scholar
Salter, Elizabeth, and Parkes, M. B., eds. Troilus and Criseyde: A Facsimile of Corpus Christi College MS 61 (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1978).Google Scholar
Sanders, Arnold. ‘Writing Fame: Epitaph Transcriptions in Renaissance Chaucer Editions and the Construction of Chaucer’s Poetic Reputation’, JEBS, 14 (2011), 105–30.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Daniel. ‘Missing Books in the Folk Codicology of Later Medieval England’, The Mediaeval Journal, 7.2 (2017), 103–32.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Daniel Reading English Verse in Manuscript c. 1350–c. 1500 (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Scase, Wendy. ‘“Looke This Calender and Then Proced”: Tables of Contents in Medieval English Manuscripts’, in The Dynamics of the Medieval Manuscript: Text Collections from a European Perspective, ed. by Pratt, Karen, Besamusca, Bart, Meyer, Matthias, and Putter, Ad (Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2017), pp. 287–306.Google Scholar
Schurink, Fred. ‘Manuscript Commonplace Books, Literature, and Reading in Early Modern England’, HLQ, 73.3 (2010), 453–69.Google Scholar
Schweik, Susan M. The Ugly Laws: Disability in Public (New York University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Scott, David A. Art: Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery (Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Scott-Warren, Jason. ‘Nashe’s Stuff’, in The Oxford Handbook of English Prose 1500–1640, ed. by Hadfield, Andrew (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 204–18.Google Scholar
Seaton, Ethel. ‘“The Devonshire Manuscript” and Its Medieval Fragments’, RES, 7.25 (1956), 55–6.Google Scholar
Seymour., M. C., ed. A Catalogue of Chaucer Manuscripts, 2 vols. (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1995).Google Scholar
Shakespeare Census, ‘STC 22274 Fo. 2 no. 03’, https://shakespearecensus.org/copy/177/.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Pericles, Prince of Tyre, ed. by Warren, Roger, in The Oxford Shakespeare, ed. by Wells, Stanley (Oxford University Press, 2003). Oxford Scholarly Editions Online (2012), https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00005596.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Christian. ‘The Early Prints of the Testament of Cresseid and the Presentation of Lines 577–91’, ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews, 20.1 (2007), 24–8.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. John Dee: The Politics of Reading and Writing in the English Renaissance (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Shrank, Cathy. ‘“These Fewe Scribbled Rules”: Representing Scribal Intimacy in Early Modern Print’, HLQ, 67.2 (2004), 295–314.Google Scholar
Silverstone. ‘The Vision of Pierce Plowman’, Notes and Queries, 6, 2nd ser., 142 (1858), 229–30.Google Scholar
Simpson, James. ‘Chaucer’s Presence and Absence, 1400–1550’, in The Cambridge Companion to Chaucer, ed. by Boitani, Piero and Mann, Jill, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 251–69.Google Scholar
Simpson, James ‘Diachronic History and the Shortcomings of Medieval Studies’, in Reading the Medieval in Early Modern England, ed. by McMullan, Gordon and Matthews, David (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Singh, Devani. ‘An Unreported Chaucer Epitaph in English’, Notes and Queries, 68.1 (2021), 51–9.Google Scholar
Singh, Devani ‘Caxton and His Readers: Histories of Book Use in a Copy of The Canterbury Tales (c. 1483)’, JEBS, 20 (2017), 233–49.Google Scholar
Singh, Devani ‘“in his old dress”: Packaging Thomas Speght’s Chaucer for Renaissance Readers’, ChR, 51.4 (2016), 478–502.Google Scholar
Singh, Devani ‘The Progeny of Print: Manuscript Adaptations of John Speed’s Chaucer Engraving’, Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures, 9.2 (2020), 177–98.Google Scholar
Skeat, Walter W., ed. Chaucerian and Other Pieces: A Supplement to the Complete Works (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1926).Google Scholar
Skeat, Walter W. The Chaucer Canon: With a Discussion of the Works Associated with the Name of Geoffrey Chaucer (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900).Google Scholar
Skeat, Walter W. ed. The Tale of Gamelyn, from the Harleian MS. No. 7334, Collated with Six Other MSS (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884).Google Scholar
Smith, Emma. Shakespeare’s First Folio: Four Centuries of an Iconic Book, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Smyth, Adam. Material Texts in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Spearing, A. C. Medieval to Renaissance in English Poetry (Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene, in The Poetical Works of Edmund Spenser: In Three Volumes, ed. by Smith, J. C. (Oxford University Press, 1909), 11. Oxford Scholarly Editions Online (2013), 10.1093/actrade/9780199679690.book.1.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, Caroline F. E. Five Hundred Years of Chaucer Criticism and Allusion (1357–1900), 3 vols. (London: Published for the Chaucer Society by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, and by Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., Ltd., 1918).Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter. ‘“Little Jobs”: Broadsides and the Printing Revolution’, in Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies After Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, ed. by Baron, Sabrina A., Lindquist, Eric N., and Shevlin, Eleanor F. (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007), pp. 315–41.Google Scholar
Steiner, Emily. Documentary Culture and the Making of Medieval English Literature (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Stenner, Rachel, Badcoe, Tamsin, and Griffith, Gareth, eds. Rereading Chaucer and Spenser: Dan Geffrey with the New Poete (Manchester University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Stijnman, Ad, and Savage, Elizabeth, eds. Printing Colour 1400–1700: History, Techniques, Functions and Receptions (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar
Stinson, Timothy L. ‘(In)Completeness in Middle English Literature: The Case of the Cook’s Tale and the Tale of Gamelyn’, Manuscript Studies: A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies, 1.1 (2016), 115–34.Google Scholar
Strongman, Sheila. ‘John Parker’s Manuscripts: An Edition of the Lists in Lambeth Palace MS 737’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 7.1 (1977), 1–27.Google Scholar
Summit, Jennifer. Lost Property: The Woman Writer and English Literary History, 1380–1589 (University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Summit, Jennifer Memory’s Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England (University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Swart, Felix. ‘Chaucer and the English Reformation’, Neophilologus, 62.4 (1978), 616–19.Google Scholar
Sweet, Rosemary. Antiquaries: The Discovery of the Past in Eighteenth-Century Britain (London: Hambledon and London, 2004).Google Scholar
Teramura, Misha. ‘Prophecy and Emendation: Merlin, Chaucer, Lear’s Fool’, postmedieval, 10.1 (2019), 50–67.Google Scholar
Thesaurus Linguae Latinae, https://tll.degruyter.com.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann. Shakespeare’s Chaucer: A Study in Literary Origins (Liverpool University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Thynne, Francis. Chaucer: Animadversions uppon the annotacions and corrections of some imperfections of impressiones of Chaucers workes, ed. by Furnivall, Frederick J. and Kingsley, G. H. (Published for the Early English Text Society by Oxford University Press, 1875).Google Scholar
Tite, Colin G. C. The Manuscript Library of Sir Robert Cotton, The Panizzi Lectures 1993, 1x (London: British Library, 1994).Google Scholar
Tokunaga, Satoko. ‘Rubrication in Caxton’s Early English Books, c. 1476–1478’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 15.1 (2012), 59–78.Google Scholar
Treharne, Elaine. Perceptions of Medieval Manuscripts: The Phenomenal Book (Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Trettien, Whitney. ‘Creative Destruction and the Digital Humanities’, in The Routledge Research Companion to Digital Medieval Literature, ed. by Boyle, Jennifer E. and Burgess, Helen J. (London; New York: Routledge, 2017), pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
Trigg, Stephanie. Congenial Souls: Reading Chaucer from Medieval to Postmodern (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Trithemius, Johannes. In Praise of Scribes. De Laude Scriptorum, trans. by Roland Behrendt (Lawrence, KA: Coronado Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Universal Short Title Catalogue, https://ustc.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Varila, Mari-Liisa, and Peikola, Matti. ‘Promotional Conventions on English Title-Pages up to 1550: Modifiers of Time, Scope, and Quality’, in Norms and Conventions in the History of English, ed. by Bös, Birte and Claridge, Claudia (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2019), pp. 73–97.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Míċeál. ‘Creating Comfortable Boundaries: Scribes, Editors, and the Invention of the Parson’s Tale’, in Rewriting Chaucer: Culture, Authority, and the Idea of the Authentic Text, 1400–1602, ed. by Prendergast, Thomas A. and Kline, Barbara (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999), pp. 45–90.Google Scholar
Wagner, Anthony, ed. A Catalogue of English Mediaeval Rolls of Arms (Oxford: Printed by Charles Batey for the Society of Antiquaries, 1950).Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel. Scribal Correction and Literary Craft: English Manuscripts 1375–1510 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel ‘When Scribes Won’t Write: Gaps in Middle English Books’, SAC, 36.1 (2014), 249–78.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel ‘Writing the Words’, in The Production of Books in England 1350–1500, ed. by Gillespie, Alexandra and Wakelin, Daniel (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 34–58.Google Scholar
Walker, Greg. Writing Under Tyranny: English Literature and the Henrician Reformation (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. Providence in Early Modern England (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Warner, Lawrence. The Myth of Piers Plowman: Constructing a Medieval Literary Archive (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Watson, Andrew G., ed. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts of All Souls College, Oxford (Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Watson, Andrew G. ‘Robert Hare’s Books’, repr. in his Medieval Manuscripts in Post-Medieval England (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 209–32.Google Scholar
Watson, Andrew G. ‘The Post-Medieval Library of All-Souls’, repr. in his Medieval Manuscripts in Post-Medieval England (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 65–91.Google Scholar
Watson, Andrew G. ‘Thomas Allen of Oxford and His Manuscripts’, in Medieval Scribes, Manuscripts and Libraries: Essays Presented to N. R. Ker, ed. by Parkes, M. B. and Watson, Andrew G. (London: Scolar Press, 1978), pp. 279–314.Google Scholar
Watson, Nicholas. ‘Outdoing Chaucer: Lydgate’s Troy Book and Henryson’s Testament of Cresseid as Comparative Imitations of Troilus and Criseyde’, in Shifts and Transpositions in Medieval Narrative: A Festschrift for Dr. Elspeth Kennedy, ed. by Pratt, Karen (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 1994), pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Watt, Tessa. Cheap Print and Popular Piety, 1550–1640 (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Wawn, Andrew N. ‘The Genesis of “The Plowman’s Tale”’, The Yearbook of English Studies, 2 (1972), 21–40.Google Scholar
Weiskott, Eric. Meter and Modernity in English Verse, 1350-1650 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Werner, Sarah. Studying Early Printed Books, 1450–1800: A Practical Guide (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2019).Google Scholar
White, Eric Marshall. ‘Fust & Schoeffer’s Canon Missae and the Invention of the Hybrid Book’ (presented at the 2015–16 Book History Colloquium at Columbia University, 2016).Google Scholar
White, Tom. ‘National Philology, Imperial Hierarchies, and the “Defective” Book of Sir John Mandeville’, RES, 71.302 (2020), 828–49.Google Scholar
Whittington, Leah. ‘The Mutilated Text’, in The Unfinished Book, ed. by Gillespie, Alexandra and Lynch, Deidre (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 429–43.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Alison. ‘What Did Renaissance Readers Write in Their Printed Copies of Chaucer?’, The Library, 7th ser., 9.1 (2008), 3–36.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Martin, and Richardson, Catherine, eds. British Drama, 1533–1642: A Catalogue, 9 vols. Oxford Scholarly Editions Online (2020), 10.1093/actrade/9780198739111.book.1.Google Scholar
Williams, Ian. ‘“He Creditted More the Printed Booke”: Common Lawyers’ Receptivity to Print, c. 1550–1640’, Law and History Review, 28.1 (2010), 39–70.Google Scholar
Wing, Donald. A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales and British America and of English Books Printed in Other Countries 1641–1700, 2nd ed., rev. and enl. (New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1982–8).Google Scholar
Witt, Charlotte. Ways of Being: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wolfe, Matthew C. ‘Placing Chaucer’s Retraction for a Reception of Closure’, ChR, 33.4 (1999), 427–31.Google Scholar
Woolf, Daniel R. ‘Images of the Antiquary in Seventeenth-Century England’, in Visions of Antiquity: The Society of Antiquaries of London 1707–2007, ed. by Pearce, Susan (Society of Antiquaries of London, 2007), pp. 11–44.Google Scholar
Woolf, Daniel R. Reading History in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Woolf, Daniel R. The Social Circulation of the Past: English Historical Culture, 1500–1730 (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Woudhuysen, H. R. Sir Philip Sidney and the Circulation of Manuscripts, 1558–1640 (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Yeager, R. F. ‘Literary Theory at the Close of the Middle Ages: William Caxton and William Thynne’, SAC, 6.1 (1984), 135–64.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access