Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:35:38.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First language acquisition of French grammar (from 10 months to 4 years old)1 Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2012

MARTINE SEKALI
MARTINE SEKALI*
Affiliation:
University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense
*
Address for correspondence: Martine Sekali, UFR Langues, Littérature, Civilisation, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 200 Avenue de la République, 92001 Nanterre cedex, France e-mail: sekali@u-paris10.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How do French children acquire the grammatical system of their native language so easily? Many hypotheses have been put forward and experimentally tested to solve this mystery. Generative theories argue that grammar is a universal and innate ability ready to be instantiated after birth. Within this framework, grammatical development is seen as a process whereby universal grammar gradually settles into the language-specific structures of the linguistic input that children receive in the first years of life. In the last decades however, many researchers of child language development have suggested other explanations. Current functional-cognitive research (cf. Langacker, 1988, 2000; Bybee, 1995, 2002; Elman et al., 1996; Tomasello, 2003; Diessel, 2004), proposes a usage-based approach to first language acquisition, where grammar is shaped by usage, and linguistic constructions are taken from parental input and gradually generalised by the child. Usage-based theories thus consider grammatical development as a dynamic process which emerges and evolves, in parallel with cognitive and psychological development, through the use of symbolic patterns which consolidate into grammatical constructions.

Type
Introduction
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: First language acquisition of French grammar (from 10 months to 4 years old) , March 2012 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

My warmest thanks go to all the members of the CoLaJE ANR research project, and in particular, to A. Morgenstern, P. Beaupoil, M. Blondel, D. Boutet, M. Collombel, S. Caët, N. Chang, C. Dascalu, C. Dodane, C. Enzinger, C. Maillard, K. Martel, E. Mathiot, C. Parisse, C. Rossi, and V. Charrière for their time and involvement in the DevGra (Grammatical Development) section of our research. Their careful readings, and stimulating remarks have proved essential to this work.

References

REFERENCES

Budwig, N. (1995). A Developmental-functionalist Approach to Child Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2002). Sequentiality at the basis of constituent structure. In: Givon, T. and Malle, B. (eds), From Pre-language to Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. (2004). The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. and Kay, P. (1993). Construction Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labelle, M. (1994). L'utilisation de la valeur des temps du passé par les enfants francophones. Revue Québequoise de linguistique, 23/1: 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., Parisse, C., and Sekali, M. (2009). A la source du futur: premières formes verbales dans les productions spontanées de deux enfants français de 18 mois à 3 ans. Faits de Langues: Le futur, 33: 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabeau-Jouannet, E. (1977). L'expression de l'organisation spatiale et temporelle, son évolution chez l'enfant de 2 à 5 ans. In: François, F., François, D., Sabeau-Jouannet, E. and Sourdot, M. (eds), La Syntaxe de l'enfant avant 5 ans. Paris: Larousse, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar