Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:24:21.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better: IR theory, utopia, and a failure to (re)imagine failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

Clive Gabay Open the ORCID record for Clive Gabay [Opens in a new window]
Clive Gabay*
Affiliation:
School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: c.gabay@qmul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Important scholarship in International Relations (IR) theory engages with the utopian tradition in order to render it ‘realistic’, whereby ‘failed’ utopian projects become necessarily unrealistic, and anti-political. The paper suggests such scholarship is informed by a narrow chronotic register, and a dichotomous ontology of chronos and kairos derived in part from the work of Karl Mannheim and E.H. Carr. As such, utopian scholarship in IR constructs a self-reinforcing relationship between change and realism, whereby only ‘realistic’ interventions can affect normatively desirable change, and therefore only interventions that are possible under current social and political conditions are normatively desirable. Drawing on the idea that the quest for utopia must always fail, the paper suggests that IR theory should be far more attuned to ‘failure’ than as simply a phenomenon that helps define the boundary between the realistic and unrealistic. The paper draws on non-canonical literatures from utopian studies and anarchism, to furnish an alternative ‘no-point’ form of utopianism that dissolves the chronos/kairos binary and thus engages neither in universalist and violent end-point, nor institutionally compromised ‘mid-range’ utopianism. This acts to reconceptualise ‘failure’ in excess of itself, a productive site for IR scholarship, and a political archive for movements and struggles to learn from.

Keywords

Chronosfailurekairosutopia
Type
Research Article
Information
International Theory , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , July 2022 , pp. 285 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Beckett 1984.

References

Alexander, Michelle. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. 1984. Worstward Ho. London: Calder Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2007. The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400827978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenskötter, Felix. 2011. “Reclaiming the Vision Thing: Constructivists as Students of the Future.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (3): 647–68.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00669.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2016. “Undoing the Epistemic Disavowal of the Haitian Revolution: A Contribution to Global Social Thought.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Ernst. 1918/2000. The Spirit of Utopia. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst. 1954/1995. The Principle of Hope, Volume One, translated by Plaice, Neville, Plaice, Stephen and Knight, Paul. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Böker, Marit. 2017. “The Concept of Realistic Utopia: Ideal Theory as Critique.” Constellations (Oxford, England) 24 (1): 89–100.Google Scholar
Boldyrev, Ivan. 2014. Ernst Bloch and His Contemporaries: Locating Utopian Messianism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken. 1991. “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice.” International Affairs 67 (3): 527–45.10.2307/2621950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Ken. 1995. “Dare not to Know: International Relations Theory versus the Future.” In International Relations Theory Today, edited by Booth, Ken and Smith, Steve. Cambridge: Polity Press, 328–50.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken. 2009. “Changing Global Realities: Critical Theory for Critical Times”, Paper presented to the 8th METU International Relations Conference, June, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
Brincat, Shannon. 2009. “Reclaiming the Utopian Imaginary in IR Theory.” Review of International Studies 35 (3): 581–609.10.1017/S0260210509008663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broué, Pierre. 2005. The German Revolution 1918–1923. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris. 2002. “The Construction of a ‘Realistic Utopia': John Rawls and International Political Theory.” Review of International Studies 28 (1): 5–21.10.1017/S0260210502000050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallet. 1939/2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallet. 1961/2001. What is History? London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallet. 1981/2001. “Preface to the 1981 Printing.” In The Twenty Years’ Crisis, edited by Carr, Edward Hallet, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, cxix.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Glen. 2014. Red Skin White Masks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816679645.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Michael. 2001. “A Brief Guide to the Writings of E.H. Carr.” In The Twenty Years’ Crisis, edited by Carr, Edward Hallet. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, lxxv–lxxix.Google Scholar
David, Anthony. 2015. “Gustav Landauer's Tragic Theatre: The Drama of Revolution.” In Gustav Landauer: Anarchist and Jew, edited by Paul, Mendes-Flohr and Mali, Anya. 92–107. Berlin, Munich, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110368598.92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, Richard. 2005. Gramsci is Dead: Anarchist Currents in the Newest Social Movements. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3): 205–35.Google Scholar
Gabay, C. 2020. “Exploring a European Tradition of Allyship with Sovereign Struggles against Colonial Violence: A Critique of Giorgio Agamben and Jacques Derrida through the Heretical Jewish Anarchism of Gustav Landauer (1870–1919).” Contemporary Political Theory 19: 251–73.10.1057/s41296-019-00358-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Uri. 2018. “Anarchism and Nationalism.” In A Companion to Anarchist Philosophy, edited by Jun, Nathan. 196–215. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gradin, Sofa. 2015. “Radical Routes and Alternative Avenues: How Cooperatives Can Be Non-Capitalist.” Review of Radical Political Economics 47 (2): 141–58.10.1177/0486613414532764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 1990. Revolution and Foreign Policy: The Case of South Yemen, 1967–1987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511622366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 2001. The World at 2000: Perils and Promises. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-333-99427-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 2003. “Utopian Realism: The Challenge for ‘Revolution’ in our Times.” In Revolutions: Rethinking Radical Change in the age of Globalization, edited by Foran, John, 300–09. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, Fred, and Molyneux, Maxine. 1982. The Ethiopian Revolution. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Harman, Chris. 2008. The Lost Revolution: Germany 1918 to 1923. London: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan, and Alex, Prichard. 2017. “Anarchy and IR Theory: A Reconsideration.” Journal of International Political Theory 13 (3): 252–65.10.1177/1755088217719911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hom, Andrew. 2018. “Silent Order: The Temporal Turn in Critical International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46 (3): 303–30.10.1177/0305829818771349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2000. “Towards a Feminist International Ethics.” Review of International Studies 26: 111–30.10.1017/S026021050000111XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2004. “World Politics and the Question of Progress.” Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History (formerly Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought) 8: 211–34.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2008. Time and World Politics: Thinking the Present. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.7228/manchester/9780719073021.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 2005. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Jones, Owen. 2020. “Corbyn and Sanders may Have Gone, but They Have Radically Altered Our Politics.” The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/16/corbyn-sanders-politics-radical-young-people - Accessed on 30 April 2020.Google Scholar
Karp, David Jason. 2008. “The Utopia and Reality of Sovereignty: Social Reality, Normative IR and ‘Organized Hypocrisy’.” Review of International Studies 34: 315–35.10.1017/S0260210508008048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Gabriel. 2010. “Introduction.” In Revolution and Other Writings: A Political Reader, edited by Kuhn, Gabriel. 18–61. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Gabriel. Ed. 2012. All Power to the Councils! A Documentary History of the German Revolution of 1918–1919. Oakland, CA: PM PressGoogle Scholar
Landauer, Gustav, 1907/2010. “Die Revolution.” In Revolution and Other Writings: A Political Reader, edited by Kuhn, Gabriel. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 110–86.Google Scholar
Landauer, Gustav. 1909/2010. “The Socialist Way.” In Revolution and Other Writings: A Political Reader, edited by Kuhn, Gabriel. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 191–95.Google Scholar
Landauer, Gustav. 1919/2012a “Letter to Georg Springer.” In All Power to the Councils! A Documentary History of the German Revolution of 1918–1919, edited by Kuhn, Gabriel, 188–89. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Landauer, Gustav. 1919/2012b. “Letter to the Executive Council of the Second Council Republic.” In All Power to the Councils! A Documentary History of the German Revolution of 1918–1919, edited by Kuhn, Gabriel, 195. Oakland, CA: PM PressGoogle Scholar
Landemore, Hélène, and Ferreras, Isabelle. 2016. “In Defense of Workplace Democracy: Towards a Justification of the Firm–State Analogy.” Political Theory 44 (1): 53–81.10.1177/0090591715600035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, George. 2008. “A Realistic Utopia? Nancy Fraser, Cosmopolitanism and the Making of a Just World Order.” Political Studies 56: 881–906.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00735.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, George. 2019. Anatomies of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108697385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, Ruth. 2013. Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137314253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linebaugh, Peter and Rediker, Marcus. 2002. The Many-Headed Hydra: The Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa. 2004. “Credo: On the State of Russian Social Democracy.” In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, edited by Hudis, Peter and Anderson, Kevin B., 266–80. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Malleson, Tom. 2014. After Occupy: Economic Democracy for the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199330102.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1936/1960. Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Maurer, Charles B. 1971. Call to Revolution, the Mystical Anarchism of Gustav Landauer. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Mearscheimer, John. 2005. “E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On.” International Relations 19 (2): 139–52.10.1177/0047117805052810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles. 2017. Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190245412.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, James. ed. 2018. Council Democracy: Towards a Democratic Socialist Politics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351205634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Michael. 1992. Rationality and the Analysis of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511598739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Michael. 1998. “Realism and Utopianism Revisited.” Review of International Studies 24: 65–82.10.1017/S0260210598000655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocalan, Abdullah. 2011. Democratic Confederalism. London, Cologne: Transmedia Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Prichard, Alex. 2010. “What can the Absence of Anarchism Tell us about the History and Purpose of International Relations?” Review of International Studies 37 (4): 1647–69.10.1017/S0260210510001075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossdale, Chris. 2010. “Anarchy is What Anarchists Make of it: Reclaiming the Concept of Agency in IR and Security Studies.” Millennium - Journal of International Studies 39 (2): 483–501.10.1177/0305829810384006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward W. 2001/2012. “On Lost Causes.” In Reflections on Exile and Other Essays, edited by Said, Edward W., 527–53. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lyman Tower. 1994. “The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited.” Utopian Studies 5 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Sargisson, Lucy. 2009. “Reflections: Can Utopianism Exist Without Intent?” Journal for Cultural Research 13 (1): 89–94.10.1080/14797580802674894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak; Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Christina. 2016. In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Charlotte: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Shilliam, Robbie. 2015. The Black Pacific: Anti-Colonial Struggles and Oceanic Connections. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781474218788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirk, Mark. 2019. “The Universal Eye: Anarchist ‘Propaganda of the Deed’ and Development of the Modern Surveillance State.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (2): 334–45.10.1093/isq/sqy062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Audra. 2014. Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life across the Borders of Settler States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sisson Runyan, Anne, and Spike Peterson, V. 1991. “The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 16 (1): 67–106.10.1177/030437549101600103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunkara, Bhaskar. 2020. “Bernie Sanders’ Political Revolution is not Over”, The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/08/bernie-sanders-revolution-not-over Accessed on 30th April 2020Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2001. Feminist International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. 2018. “Martin Luther King's Radical Anticapitalism.” The Paris Review. Available at https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2018/01/15/remembering-martin-luther-kings-radical-class-politics/ Accessed on 13th August 2020Google Scholar
Thompson, Peter. 2013. “Religion, Utopia and the Metaphysics of Contingency.” In The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia, edited by Thompson, Peter and Zizek, Slavoj, 82–105. Raleigh: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822377115-005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Scott. 1998. “Global Civil Society, Anarchy and Governance: Assessing an Emerging Paradigm.” Journal of Peace Research 35: 25–42.10.1177/0022343398035001003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venizelos, Giorgios, and Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2020. “Left-Populism Is Down but Not Out.” Jacobin Magazine. Available at https://www.jacobinmag.com/2020/03/left-populism-political-strategy-class-power Accessed on 30th April 2020Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable” European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542.10.1177/135406610394001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Peter. 2001. “Radicalism for a Conservative Purpose: The Peculiar Realism of E. H. Carr.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30 (1): 123–36.10.1177/03058298010300010901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Richard. 2012. Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Woodcock, George. 1962. Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements. Cleveland and New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 2013. “Transforming Capitalism through Real Utopias.” American Sociological Review 78 (1): 1–25.10.1177/0003122412468882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeoman, Ruth. 2014. Meaningful Work and Workplace Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137370587CrossRefGoogle Scholar