Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:17:08.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of 2′-fucosyllactose and galacto-oligosaccharides on the growth and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

K. Salli*
Affiliation:
DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Kantvik, Finland Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
E. Söderling
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
J. Hirvonen
Affiliation:
DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Kantvik, Finland
U. K. Gürsoy
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
A. C. Ouwehand
Affiliation:
DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Kantvik, Finland
*
*Corresponding author: K. Salli, email krista.salli@dupont.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human milk oligosaccharides, such as 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), a prebiotic carbohydrate mixture, are being increasingly added to infant formulas, necessitating the understanding of their impact on the oral microbiota. Here, for the first time, the effects of 2′-FL and GOS on the planktonic growth and adhesion characteristics of the caries-associated oral pathogen Streptococcus mutans were assessed, and the results were compared against the effects of xylitol, lactose and glucose. There were differences in S. mutans growth between 2′-FL and GOS. None of the three S. mutans strains grew with 2′-FL, while they all grew with GOS as well as lactose and glucose. Xylitol inhibited S. mutans growth. The adhesion of S. mutans CI 2366 to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite was reduced by 2′-FL and GOS. Exopolysaccharide-mediated adhesion of S. mutans DSM 20523 to a glass surface was decreased with 2′-FL, GOS and lactose, and the adhesion of strain CI 2366 strain was reduced only by GOS. Unlike GOS, 2′-FL did not support the growth of any S. mutans strain. Neither 2′-FL nor GOS enhanced the adhesive properties of the S. mutans strains, but they inhibited some of the tested strains. Thus, the cariogenic tendency may vary between infant formulas containing different types of oligosaccharides.

Type
Full Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), a diverse group of carbohydrates, are the third most abundant component in human milk(Reference Bode1). More than 150 HMO structures have been identified in human breast milk, of which 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL; trisaccharide of fucose, galactose and glucose) is the most abundant HMO(Reference Bode1,Reference Thurl, Munzert and Boehm2) . The concentration of 2′-FL in human milk is approximately 2·7 g/l, although it can vary, depending on the time of lactation(Reference Thurl, Munzert and Boehm2). Only a small proportion of HMOs are absorbed, and most are fermented in the colon by the microbiota, primarily by specific bifidobacteria, such as Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Reference Bode1). HMOs function as selective prebiotics, improve immune development in the host and inhibit the adhesion of certain pathogens in the gut(Reference Bode1,Reference Chichlowski, German and Lebrilla3,Reference Newburg4) . Recent advances in the production of HMOs have allowed 2′-FL to be included in infant formulas to better approximate the composition of breast milk(Reference Marriage, Buck and Goehring5,Reference Puccio, Alliet and Cajozzo6) , since fucosylated oligosaccharides are nearly absent from bovine milk which is used as basis for infant formulas(Reference Aldredge, Geronimo and Hua7). Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) are a mixture of lactose-based oligosaccharides with varying lengths and linkages between glucose and galactose, the terminal unit being glucose(Reference Torres, Gonçalves and Teixeira8). GOS are often used in infant formulas to mimic the prebiotic features of human milk(Reference Torres, Gonçalves and Teixeira8Reference Sierra, Bernal and Blasco10).

Dental caries is a common multifactorial disease, in which bacteria in a biofilm produce acids that dissolve enamel(Reference Abranches, Zeng and Kajfasz11). Streptococcus mutans is one of the most extensively studied cariogenic bacteria. S. mutans is well adapted to thrive under biofilm conditions that alter bacterial metabolism and decrease the susceptibility to host defence and antimicrobials(Reference Abranches, Zeng and Kajfasz11Reference Marsh13). S. mutans produces acids efficiently, creates a low-pH environment, utilises various carbon sources and can adhere to the tooth surface through the production of extracellular glucans and adhesins(Reference Abranches, Zeng and Kajfasz11,Reference Bowen and Koo14) . The acquisition of mutans streptococci (i.e. S. mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus) at an early age is a risk factor for caries development later in life, the risk of which can be decreased through caries prevention strategies early in the prenatal and postnatal phases(Reference Köhler and Andréen15,Reference Xiao, Alkhers and Kopycka-Kedzierawski16) . Several mechanisms have been proposed to interfere with the virulence of S. mutans, such as inhibiting adhesion, preventing growth through non-fermentable carbon sources and affecting biofilm formation(Reference Krzyściak, Jurczak and Kościelniak17,Reference Zhan18) . There are limited data on the effects of HMOs and GOS on S. mutans and other oral bacteria. However, GOS are structurally different from the oligosaccharides naturally occurring in human milk(Reference Bode and Jantscher-Krenn19).

Breast milk components can alter the composition of the oral microbiota, several of which have been examined with regard to their effects on growth, adhesion and biofilm formation in S. mutans (Reference Allison, Walker and Sanders20Reference Vacca-Smith, Van Wuyckhuyse and Tabak22). Infant formulas contain caries-protective components, such as proteins and Ca, but the carbohydrates in them may increase the risk for caries, especially if bottle feeding is taking place ad libitum, several times a day.

Because GOS and, increasingly, HMOs are added to infant formulas, there is an urgent need to determine the influence of these carbon sources on cariogenic bacteria and how they affect the bacterial colonisation on teeth. We hypothesised that mutans streptococci can use HMOs and GOS as sources of carbohydrate to increase their growth and adhesion. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine whether a specific HMO, 2′-FL and GOS – in the form of a commercial prebiotic – shape the growth and adhesion of three strains of the dental pathogen S. mutans in vitro and compare the results to those of xylitol and lactose.

Materials and methods

Micro-organisms

Three strains of S. mutans were tested: the type strain DSM 20523 (ATCC 25175), Ingbritt and the clinical isolate CI 2366. The origin, isolation and identification of the clinical isolate have been described earlier(Reference Söderling, Ekman and Taipale23,Reference Söderling and Hietala-Lenkkeri24) .

Test substrates

A 10 % (w/v) suspension of 2′-FL (DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences and Inbiose), xylitol (DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences), glucose (J. T. Baker), lactose (Sigma-Aldrich) and GOS (kindly provided by Clasado Biosciences) were prepared in sterile water, sterile-filtered (0·2 μm Minisart; Sartorius AG) and stored at −20°C until use.

Growth experiments

Bacterial growth experiments were performed as previously described(Reference Mäkeläinen, Saarinen and Stowell25). Briefly, S. mutans strains were revived from frozen (−70°C) stocks and subcultured in glucose-containing Brain Heart Infusion medium (BHI) (LAB049; LabM Ltd) or Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) (Bacto™; Becton Dickinson and Company) at 37°C overnight. After the subculture, bacteria were inoculated in fresh TSB growth medium with glucose and incubated at 37°C overnight. Cell suspensions (1 % (v/v)) were prepared in modified TSB without carbohydrates and used immediately for the growth assays.

2′-FL, xylitol, GOS, lactose or glucose solution (10 %) were added to each well of the plate (20 µl), and the wells were filled with suspensions of a single bacterial strain (180 µl). Thus, the final concentration of the carbohydrate substrate in each well was 1 % (w/v). Modified TSB without any added carbohydrates (sterile water was added instead of test substances) was used as a control. Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm every 30 min for 24 h on a Bioscreen© C system (Labsystems) in an anaerobic cabinet (80 % N2, 10 % CO2, 10 % H2). The area under the growth curve over 24 h was used to quantify growth(Reference Mäkeläinen, Saarinen and Stowell25). Three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate, were run.

Adhesion to hydroxyapatite

Adhesion to hydroxyapatite (HA) was evaluated per Haukioja et al. (Reference Haukioja, Loimaranta and Tenovuo26). Parotid saliva was collected on ice each morning before the experiments using Lashley cups by stimulation with a Salivin lozenge (Pharmacia Ltd). Parotid saliva was diluted 1:1 with buffered KCl (50 mm KCl, 0·35 mm K2HPO4, 0·65 mm KH2PO4, 1·0 mm CaCl2, 0·1 mm MgCl2 and pH 6·5) before the experiments. The diluted saliva was used to coat the HA powder (Clarkson Chromatography Products Inc.), after which the HA was washed three times before bacteria were added. S. mutans was first grown overnight in BHI (Becton Dickinson) at 37°C and then for 3–4 h until the mid-logarithmic phase with 5 µl (50 µCi) 35S-labelled methionine (Perkin Elmer LifeSciences, Inc.). After growth, the bacteria were washed three times and suspended in phosphate-buffered KCl to approximately 108 colony-forming units/ml. Suspensions (125 µl) of labelled bacteria and 1 % (w/v) 2′-FL, xylitol, GOS, lactose and plain buffer as a control were added to HA, to which the bacteria were allowed to adhere for 60 min under gentle agitation (IKA loopster; IKA®-Werke GmbH & Co. KG). Unbound bacteria were removed through three washes with 125 µl buffer. Labelled bacteria that adhered to HA were determined on a scintillation counter (MicroBeta 1450; Perkin Elmer Wallac) using scintillation cocktail (Optiphase Supermix/Optiphase Hisafe 3; PerkinElmer). Experiments were performed in six replicate wells (of which the lowest and highest values of scintillation counts were omitted to decrease variability; four replicates per individual experiment were used) and repeated at least twice. To combine experiments, the controls were set to 1, and the relative changes from the control were calculated.

Adhesion to glass surface

Exopolysaccharide-mediated adhesion of S. mutans strains to a smooth glass surface was examined per Mattos-Graner et al. (Reference Mattos-Graner, Smith and King27). S. mutans was first grown in BHI (LabM Ltd) at 37°C overnight. Then, triplicate samples were cultured in BHI with 1 % (w/v) sucrose (Suomen Sokeri Oy) and 1 % (w/v) 2′-FL, xylitol, GOS, lactose or plain buffer in a glass tube at a 30° angle in an anaerobic atmosphere at 37°C for 18 h. The control sample was comprised of BHI with sucrose. After incubation, the tubes were mixed gently, and unbound bacteria were transferred to another tube (planktonic bacteria). The glass tubes were rinsed with potassium phosphate buffer (0·05 mol/l, pH = 7) and remixed, and unbound bacteria were again transferred to the tube with planktonic bacteria. Then, potassium phosphate buffer was added to the glass tubes to quantify the bacteria that adhered to the glass. The planktonic bacteria tubes were centrifuged 6500 rpm for 5 min (Heraeus Biofuge Stratos, Kendro Laboratory Products), and the pellets were resuspended in potassium phosphate buffer. All tubes were vortexed and sonicated for 30 s (Q Sonica Sonicator LCC), and OD550 (optical density at wavelength of 550 nm) values were measured against potassium phosphate buffer on an Ensight plate reader (Perkin Elmer). The percentage of adherent bacteria was calculated as the ratio of adhered bacteria to all bacteria. The data are the composite of three independent experiments. In each experiment, the treatments were performed in triplicate. To combine and compare the experiments, the controls were set to 1, and the relative changes from the control were determined.

Statistics

In growth experiments, statistical differences between treatment groups were analysed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. In adhesion experiments, statistical differences between treatment groups were analysed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPadPrism version 8.1 for Windows (GraphPad Software). P values of <0·05 were considered to be significant.

Results

S. mutans strains DSM 20523, CI 2366 and Ingbritt were unable to grow with 2′-FL as the sole carbon source, comparable with the result when no carbon source was added to the TSB growth medium (P > 0·05 for all strains, Fig. 1). In contrast, all S. mutans strains grew with 1 % GOS, 1 % lactose or 1 % glucose as a carbon source (P < 0·001, for all strains). Xylitol inhibited the growth of all three S. mutans strains v. the control without any added carbohydrates (P < 0·05, Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Area under the growth curve (AUC) (a–c) and growth curves (e and f) of Streptococcus mutans strains DSM 20523 (a and d), CI 2366 (b and e) and Ingbritt (c and f). Growth media contained 1 % (w/v) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), xylitol, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), lactose or glucose added to modified Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB−) devoid of glucose or other carbon sources. Values are means and standard deviations from three individual experiments, each with three replicates. * P < 0·05; ** P < 0·001 compared with TSB− and inocula. OD, optical density. , 2′-FL; , xylitol; , GOS; , lactose; , glucose; , TSB− and inocula; , TSB− and no inocula.

The effects of 2′-FL, xylitol, GOS and lactose on S. mutans adhesion to parotid saliva-coated HA were evaluated (Fig. 2). There were no significant changes in strains DSM 20523 or Ingbritt v. the control with any of the carbohydrates (P > 0·05). Nevertheless, the adhesion of strain CI 2366 decreased significantly with 2′-FL and GOS compared with the control (P < 0·001 and P = 0·04, respectively).

Fig. 2. Relative adhesion to parotid saliva-coated hydroxyapatite (HA) for three Streptococcus mutans strains (DSM 20523, Ingbritt and CI 2366) with 1 % (w/v) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), xylitol, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), lactose and phosphate buffer as a control (Ctrl). Bacterial adhesion to HA was determined by scintillation count. *P < 0·05 compared with control.

The effects of 2′-FL, xylitol, GOS and lactose on S. mutans adhesion to a glass surface – indicative of hydrophilic binding through exopolysaccharides – were also evaluated. The adhesion of strain DSM 20523 was reduced by 2′-FL (P = 0·02), lactose (P < 0·001) and GOS (P < 0·001) v. the control (Fig. 3). The adhesion of strain Ingbritt to glass was unaffected by any of the carbohydrates (P > 0·05), whereas that of strain CI 2366 decreased only with GOS (P = 0·02) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Relative adhesion of three Streptococcus mutans strains (DSM 20523, Ingbritt and CI 2366) to a glass surface. S. mutans strains were cultured in Brain Heart Infusion medium with 1 % (w/v) sucrose and 1 % (w/v) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), xylitol, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), lactose and buffer as a control (Ctrl). *P < 0·05 compared with control.

Discussion

Human breast milk contains caries-protective factors(Reference Avila, Pordeus and Paiva28Reference Tham, Bowatte and Dharmage30), but the effects of individual HMOs on oral health-related variables have not been reported. Our study is the first report on the effects of an individual HMO on S. mutans, an oral bacterium associated with the pathogenesis of caries. None of the three S. mutans strains that we tested utilised 2′-FL as a carbon source, whereas they grew well with GOS, lactose and glucose. S. mutans is well adapted to thrive in the oral cavity and can metabolise many carbon sources(Reference Abranches, Zeng and Kajfasz11,Reference Söderling, Ekman and Taipale23,Reference Moye, Zeng and Burne31,Reference Zeng, Das and Burne32) . Thus, we aimed to determine whether S. mutans grows on HMOs and other prebiotics, such as GOS, which are also added to infant formulas. 2′-FL has been studied in infant formula at 0·2–1 g/l, for other health indications than oral health, as have GOS levels at 0·2–0·5 g/dl(Reference Marriage, Buck and Goehring5,Reference Puccio, Alliet and Cajozzo6,Reference Borewicz, Suarez-Diez and Hechler9,Reference Sierra, Bernal and Blasco10,Reference Matsuki, Tajima and Hara33) . The 2′-FL concentrations that we tested exceeded those in infant formula and were slightly higher than GOS concentrations.

Our results are consistent with earlier studies showing that S. mutans utilise galactose, lactose and glucose(Reference Moye, Zeng and Burne31,Reference Zeng, Das and Burne32) . Although limited data exist regarding GOS and cariogenic bacteria, S. mutans strain MT8148R (serotype c) was found earlier to ferment GOS similarly to our strains in the present study(Reference Ooshima, Fujiwara and Takei34). As reported at low xylitol concentrations, xylitol inhibited the growth of planktonic S. mutans strains(Reference Söderling, Ekman and Taipale23). Thus, while S. mutans can grow on glucose and galactose, the building blocks of both lactose and GOS, it failed to grow with the trisaccharide 2′-FL. The structure of 2′-FL contains fucose attached to lactose with α-1,2 linkage(Reference Bode1). GOS are a mixture of varying length galactose units with lactose at the reducing end, with glycosyl linkages commonly either β-1,3, β-1,4 or β-1,6 depending on the enzyme used(Reference Ackerman, Craft and Townsend35). The growth of oral pathogens has not earlier been studied with HMOs, but potentially pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae and Clostridium perfringens did not grow using 2′-FL(Reference Hoeflinger, Davis and Chow36,Reference Yu, Chen and Newburg37) . In addition, pooled HMOs have been shown to inhibit the growth of Streptococcus agalactiae CNCTC 10/18 (group B Streptococcus)(Reference Ackerman, Doster and Weitkamp38). However, the inhibition rate varied depending on HMO donors (and thereby the HMO composition). Degradation of HMOs requires an extensive set of glycoside hydrolases, membrane transporters and carbohydrate binding proteins(Reference Marcobal and Sonnenburg39). Absence of these key proteins has been shown to result in the lack of ability to grow on HMOs. Bacteria, such as bifidobacteria or Bacteroides, which are able to grow with HMOs like 2′-FL, mainly apply one of the two strategies. B. longum subsp. infantis has several glycoside hydrolases, ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters and extracellular solute binding proteins, it utilises to import HMOs into the cell and degrade oligosaccharides intracellularly(Reference Marcobal and Sonnenburg39Reference Zabel, Yde and Roos41). Bacteroides, on the other hand, have been proposed to degrade complex HMOs partly and then transport processed oligosaccharides inside the cell for further degradation(Reference Marcobal and Sonnenburg39). The α-1,2-fucosidase is required for utilising 2′-FL. However, its presence does not always show as utilisation of 2′-FL(Reference Ruiz-Moyano, Totten and Garrido42). Recently, Streptococcus pneumoniae has been shown to contain two α-fucosidases(Reference Hobbs, Pluvinage and Robb43). The genome sequence of S. mutans strain UA159 is known to have four ABC transporters(Reference Ajdić and Pham44), but transcription profiles for fucose or HMOs were not studied. Our results indicate that the studied S. mutans strains do not express the enzymes or other factors required to metabolise α-1,2 fucosylated carbohydrates. Consequently, 2′-FL should have no negative impact on the cariogenic potential of infant formulas, whereas other less selective prebiotic oligosaccharides may have.

The two adhesion experiments showed no consistent patterns of inhibition for 2′-FL or GOS. Notably, the adhesion of the virulent clinical isolate S. mutans Cl 2366(Reference Söderling and Hietala-Lenkkeri24) to saliva-coated HA was reduced by 2′-FL and GOS. Further, exopolysaccharide-mediated adhesion to the glass surface decreased for S. mutans DSM 20523 with 2′-FL and GOS. HMOs have been suggested to function in the gut as selective prebiotics, antimicrobials, to inhibit the adhesion on colonic epithelium of some pathogens, for example, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter jejuni or protozoan parasite like Entamoeba histolytica and to modify host responses(Reference Bode1,Reference Bode45) . However, their effects are structure- and bacterium-specific(Reference Chichlowski, German and Lebrilla3,Reference Newburg4,Reference Bode45) . HMOs have structural similarities to glycan structures in the gut epithelium, and they can function as decoy receptors, hindering the binding of pathogens(Reference Newburg4,Reference Bode45) . To our knowledge, the effects of HMOs on adhesion to oral bacteria have not been studied before. The binding of S. mutans with substrates in salivary pellicle is mediated by sucrose-independent, adhesin-receptor interactions(Reference Abranches, Zeng and Kajfasz11,Reference Haukioja, Loimaranta and Tenovuo26) . The adhesion of the two reference strains to saliva-coated HA was not significantly affected by 2′-FL or GOS, but both compounds significantly decreased the adhesion of strain CI 2366(Reference Söderling and Hietala-Lenkkeri24). Earlier, other components of human milk casein, IgA and IgG have been shown to decrease the adhesion of S. mutans to saliva-coated HA(Reference Danielsson Niemi, Hernell and Johansson21,Reference Vacca-Smith, Van Wuyckhuyse and Tabak22) . Also, in earlier studies, changes in adhesion have been observed between S. mutans strains(Reference Danielsson Niemi, Hernell and Johansson21).

Adhesion to a smooth glass surface, reflecting sucrose-dependent, extracellular glycan production-mediated adherence(Reference Abranches, Zeng and Kajfasz11,Reference Mattos-Graner, Smith and King27,Reference Ooshima, Fujiwara and Takei34) , decreased or was unchanged with 2′-FL and GOS. These results are consistent with those from a similar experiment, showing that the adherence of S. sobrinus 6715 and S. mutans MT8148R was impeded by GOS(Reference Ooshima, Fujiwara and Takei34). However, for 2′-FL, our work is the first report to document the effects on exopolysaccharide-mediated adhesion in S. mutans. The two methods used in the present study evaluated two different S. mutans virulence factors. However, because of the strain-dependent variation in the results, further research is needed to clarify the effects of 2′-FL and other HMOs on S. mutans and other oral bacteria.

Xylitol did not affect the adhesion of S. mutans in any experimental setting, although its chemical properties may have suggested so. Xylitol binds water molecules and Ca ions, among other compounds, but is inert in other aspects(Reference Mäkinen46). The effects of xylitol on adhesion have never been studied in such a design as ours. Based on earlier studies, we expected that xylitol would interfere with polysaccharide-mediated cell adherence(Reference Söderling and Hietala-Lenkkeri24,Reference Ammons, Ward and Fisher47) , but we found no significant differences in adhesion at studied xylitol concentration. Also, adhesion to parotid saliva-coated HA was unaffected by xylitol.

S. mutans forms a small portion of the developing oral microbiota – if it is present at all(Reference Lif Holgerson, Öhman and Rönnlund48) – and expanding our studies to other oral pathogens and commensals could provide a broader understanding of the effects of HMOs and GOS. In addition, biofilm formation could have been evaluated to increase understanding beyond initial stages of colonisation. Human breast milk increases S. mutans biofilm formation, whereas individual milk components have various effects, with casein increasing and lactoferrin and IgA (the latter at high concentrations) decreasing biofilm formation and lactose having no effect on it(Reference Allison, Walker and Sanders20). However, although the proportion of mutans streptococci in the oral microbiota may be small, they are virulent cariogenic bacteria and key factors in dental caries(Reference Banas and Drake12), underscoring the importance of our findings. Xylitol was used as a reference substance, because it is a prebiotic(Reference Salli, Lehtinen and Tiihonen49) and because its effects on reducing growth and adherence of mutans streptococci are well documented(Reference Zhan18); and lactose, because it is the major carbohydrate component in breast milk and infant formulas(Reference Ballard and Morrow50,Reference Koletzko, Baker and Cleghorn51) . Growth was assessed continuously, and adherence to parotid saliva-coated HA surfaces and exopolysaccharide-mediated adhesion to a glass surface was evaluated.

Within the limitations of the present study, we showed that 2′-FL and GOS strain-dependently decrease S. mutans adhesion or have no effects on it. 2′-FL was not utilised by the S. mutans strains that we tested, whereas they grew well with GOS and lactose. Delaying the early colonisation of S. mutans decreases the future risk of caries in children(Reference Köhler and Andréen15,Reference Xiao, Alkhers and Kopycka-Kedzierawski16) . Thus, 2′-FL, as a compound that is present at high concentrations in human breast milk, may be beneficial for the oral health of infants by not promoting S. mutans adhesion. Also, being non-fermentable by S. mutans, 2′-FL may decrease acid production in the dental plaque, if it has already colonised erupting teeth. In the limits of this in vitro study, and in the perspective of caries pathogenesis, it can be concluded that the ability of 2′-FL to limit the growth and inhibit the adhesion of S. mutans may bring an advantage to use this milk oligosaccharide in infant formulas.

Acknowledgements

Katja Sampalahti, University of Turku, Institute of Dentistry, Turku, Finland, is acknowledged for her skilful technical assistance in HA adhesion. The authors thank Kirsi Stenström and Terhi Koskela from DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Kantvik, Finland, for their excellent assistance in bacterial growth experiments. The studies presented in this publication were sponsored, in their entirety, by DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences. Hence, DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences has the sole proprietary ownership of the results. The data may be used in regulatory filings, by DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, to obtain regulatory approvals for the 2′-FL product. The use of the results in this publication by stakeholders for regulatory filings, other than DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, require a written approval by DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences.

This work was funded by the DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences. K. S., J. H. and A. C. O. are employed by DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences and contributed to the study design, conduct of the study, analysis of the samples and data, interpretation of the findings and preparation of the manuscript.

K. S., J. H. and A. C. O. are employees of DuPont, which manufactures and sells 2′-FL under the brand Care4U™.

All authors formulated the research question and designed the study, K. S. performed the experimental work and drafted the manuscript and all analysed the data and reviewed manuscript writing. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

Bode, L (2012) Human milk oligosaccharides: every baby needs a sugar mama. Glycobiology 22, 11471162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurl, S, Munzert, M, Boehm, G, et al. (2017) Systematic review of the concentrations of oligosaccharides in human milk. Nutr Rev 75, 920933.10.1093/nutrit/nux044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chichlowski, M, German, JB, Lebrilla, CB, et al. (2011) The influence of milk oligosaccharides on microbiota of infants: opportunities for formulas. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2, 331351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newburg, DS (2005) Innate immunity and human milk. J Nutr 135, 13081312.10.1093/jn/135.5.1308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marriage, BJ, Buck, RH, Goehring, KC, et al. (2015) Infants fed a lower calorie formula with 2′-fucosyllactose (2′FL) show growth and 2′FL uptake like breast-fed infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 61, 649658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puccio, G, Alliet, P, Cajozzo, C, et al. (2017) Effects of infant formula with human milk oligosaccharides on growth and morbidity: a randomized multicenter trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 64, 624631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldredge, DL, Geronimo, MR, Hua, S, et al. (2013) Annotation and structural elucidation of bovine milk oligosaccharides and determination of novel fucosylated structures. Glycobiology 23, 664676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, DPM, Gonçalves, MdPF, Teixeira, JA, et al. (2010) Galacto-oligosaccharides: production, properties, applications, and significance as prebiotics. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9, 438454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borewicz, K, Suarez-Diez, M, Hechler, C, et al. (2019) The effect of prebiotic fortified infant formulas on microbiota composition and dynamics in early life. Sci Rep 9, 2434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sierra, C, Bernal, MJ, Blasco, J, et al. (2015) Prebiotic effect during the first year of life in healthy infants fed formula containing GOS as the only prebiotic: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Nutr 54, 8999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abranches, J, Zeng, L, Kajfasz, JK, et al. (2018) Biology of oral streptococci. Microbiol Spectr 6, 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0042-2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banas, JA & Drake, DR (2018) Are the mutans streptococci still considered relevant to understanding the microbial etiology of dental caries? BMC Oral Health 18, 129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, PD (2012) Contemporary perspective on plaque control. Br Dent J 212, 601606.10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, WH & Koo, H (2011) Biology of Streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms. Caries Res 45, 6986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köhler, B & Andréen, I (2012) Mutans streptococci and caries prevalence in children after early maternal caries prevention: a follow-up at 19 years of age. Caries Res 46, 474480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, J, Alkhers, N, Kopycka-Kedzierawski, DT, et al. (2019) Prenatal oral health care and early childhood caries prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Caries Res 53, 411421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krzyściak, W, Jurczak, A, Kościelniak, D, et al. (2014) The virulence of Streptococcus mutans and the ability to form biofilms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect 33, 499515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhan, L (2018) Rebalancing the caries microbiome dysbiosis: targeted treatment and sugar alcohols. Adv Dent Res 29, 110116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bode, L & Jantscher-Krenn, E (2012) Structure–function relationships of human milk oligosaccharides. Adv Nutr 3, 383s391s.10.3945/an.111.001404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, LM, Walker, LA, Sanders, BJ, et al. (2015) Effect of human milk and its components on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. J Clin Pediatr Dent 39, 255261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielsson Niemi, L, Hernell, O & Johansson, I (2009) Human milk compounds inhibiting adhesion of mutans streptococci to host ligand-coated hydroxyapatite in vitro. Caries Res 43, 171178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vacca-Smith, AM, Van Wuyckhuyse, BC, Tabak, LA, et al. (1994) The effect of milk and casein proteins on the adherence of Streptococcus mutans to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Arch Oral Biol 39, 10631069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Söderling, EM, Ekman, TC & Taipale, TJ (2008) Growth inhibition of Streptococcus mutans with low xylitol concentrations. Curr Microbiol 56, 382385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Söderling, EM & Hietala-Lenkkeri, AM (2010) Xylitol and erythritol decrease adherence of polysaccharide-producing oral streptococci. Curr Microbiol 60, 2529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mäkeläinen, H, Saarinen, M, Stowell, J, et al. (2010) Xylo-oligosaccharides and lactitol promote the growth of Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillus species in pure cultures. Benef Microbes 1, 139148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haukioja, A, Loimaranta, V & Tenovuo, J (2008) Probiotic bacteria affect the composition of salivary pellicle and streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23, 336343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattos-Graner, RO, Smith, DJ, King, WF, et al. (2000) Water-insoluble glucan synthesis by mutans streptococcal strains correlates with caries incidence in 12- to 30-month-old children. J Dent Res 79, 13711377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avila, WM, Pordeus, IA, Paiva, SM, et al. (2015) Breast and bottle feeding as risk factors for dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 10, e0142922.10.1371/journal.pone.0142922CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holgerson, PL, Vestman, NR, Claesson, R, et al. (2013) Oral microbial profile discriminates breast-fed from formula-fed infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 56, 127136.10.1097/MPG.0b013e31826f2bc6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tham, R, Bowatte, G, Dharmage, SC, et al. (2015) Breastfeeding and the risk of dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 104, 6284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moye, ZD, Zeng, L & Burne, RA (2014) Fueling the caries process: carbohydrate metabolism and gene regulation by Streptococcus mutans. J Oral Microbiol 6, 10.3402/jom.v6.24878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeng, L, Das, S & Burne, RA (2010) Utilization of lactose and galactose by Streptococcus mutans: transport, toxicity, and carbon catabolite repression. J Bacteriol 192, 24342444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsuki, T, Tajima, S, Hara, T, et al. (2016) Infant formula with galacto-oligosaccharides (OM55N) stimulates the growth of indigenous bifidobacteria in healthy term infants. Benef Microbes 7, 453461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ooshima, T, Fujiwara, T, Takei, T, et al. (1988) The caries inhibitory effects of GOS-sugar in vitro and in rat experiments. Microbiol Immunol 32, 10931105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackerman, DL, Craft, KM & Townsend, SD (2017) Infant food applications of complex carbohydrates: structure, synthesis, and function. Carbohydr Res 437, 1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeflinger, JL, Davis, SR, Chow, J, et al. (2015) In vitro impact of human milk oligosaccharides on Enterobacteriaceae growth. J Agric Food Chem 63, 32953302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, ZT, Chen, C & Newburg, DS (2013) Utilization of major fucosylated and sialylated human milk oligosaccharides by isolated human gut microbes. Glycobiology 23, 12811292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackerman, D, Doster, R, Weitkamp, J-H, et al. (2017) Human milk oligosaccharides exhibit antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties against Group B Streptococcus . ACS Infect Dis 3, 595605.10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcobal, A & Sonnenburg, JL (2012) Human milk oligosaccharide consumption by intestinal microbiota. Clin Microbiol Infect 18, Suppl. 4, 1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sela, DA, Chapman, J, Adeuya, A, et al. (2008) The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 1896418969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zabel, B, Yde, CC, Roos, P, et al. (2019) Novel genes and metabolite trends in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis Bi-26 metabolism of human milk oligosaccharide 2′-fucosyllactose. Sci Rep 9, 7983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-Moyano, S, Totten, SM, Garrido, DA, et al. (2013) Variation in consumption of human milk oligosaccharides by infant gut-associated strains of Bifidobacterium breve . Appl Environ Microbiol 79, 60406049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, JK, Pluvinage, B, Robb, M, et al. (2019) Two complementary alpha-fucosidases from Streptococcus pneumoniae promote complete degradation of host-derived carbohydrate antigens. J Biol Chem 294, 1267012682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ajdić, D & Pham, VTT (2007) Global transcriptional analysis of Streptococcus mutans sugar transporters using microarrays. J Bacteriol 189, 50495059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bode, L (2015) The functional biology of human milk oligosaccharides. Early Hum Dev 91, 619622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mäkinen, KK (2011) Sugar alcohol sweeteners as alternatives to sugar with special consideration of xylitol. Med Princ Pract 20, 303320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ammons, MC, Ward, LS, Fisher, ST, et al. (2009) In vitro susceptibility of established biofilms composed of a clinical wound isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa treated with lactoferrin and xylitol. Int J Antimicrob Agents 33, 230236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lif Holgerson, P, Öhman, C, Rönnlund, A, et al. (2015) Maturation of oral microbiota in children with or without dental caries. PLOS ONE 10, e0128534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salli, K, Lehtinen, MJ, Tiihonen, K, et al. (2019) Xylitol’s health benefits beyond dental health: a comprehensive review. Nutrients 11, 1813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballard, O & Morrow, AL (2013) Human milk composition: nutrients and bioactive factors. Pediatr Clin North Am 60, 4974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koletzko, B, Baker, S, Cleghorn, G, et al. (2005) Global standard for the composition of infant formula: recommendations of an ESPGHAN coordinated international expert group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 41, 584599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Area under the growth curve (AUC) (a–c) and growth curves (e and f) of Streptococcus mutans strains DSM 20523 (a and d), CI 2366 (b and e) and Ingbritt (c and f). Growth media contained 1 % (w/v) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), xylitol, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), lactose or glucose added to modified Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB−) devoid of glucose or other carbon sources. Values are means and standard deviations from three individual experiments, each with three replicates. * P < 0·05; ** P < 0·001 compared with TSB− and inocula. OD, optical density. , 2′-FL; , xylitol; , GOS; , lactose; , glucose; , TSB− and inocula; , TSB− and no inocula.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Relative adhesion to parotid saliva-coated hydroxyapatite (HA) for three Streptococcus mutans strains (DSM 20523, Ingbritt and CI 2366) with 1 % (w/v) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), xylitol, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), lactose and phosphate buffer as a control (Ctrl). Bacterial adhesion to HA was determined by scintillation count. *P < 0·05 compared with control.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Relative adhesion of three Streptococcus mutans strains (DSM 20523, Ingbritt and CI 2366) to a glass surface. S. mutans strains were cultured in Brain Heart Infusion medium with 1 % (w/v) sucrose and 1 % (w/v) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), xylitol, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), lactose and buffer as a control (Ctrl). *P < 0·05 compared with control.