Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:57:06.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Occurrence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria species in livestock from northern China and first isolation of Mycobacterium caprae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2013

W. ZENG
Affiliation:
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Haidian, Beijing, China
Y. ZHANG
Affiliation:
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, China State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changping, Beijing, China
X. ZHAO
Affiliation:
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, China State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changping, Beijing, China
G. HUANG
Affiliation:
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, China State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changping, Beijing, China
Y. JIANG
Affiliation:
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, China State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changping, Beijing, China
H. DONG
Affiliation:
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, China State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changping, Beijing, China
X. LI
Affiliation:
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, China State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changping, Beijing, China
K. WAN*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, China State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changping, Beijing, China
C. HE*
Affiliation:
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Haidian, Beijing, China
*
*Author for correspondence: Cheng He, DVM, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China. (Email: hecheng@cau.edu.cn) [C. He] (Email: wankanglin@icdc.cn) [K. Wan]
*Author for correspondence: Cheng He, DVM, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China. (Email: hecheng@cau.edu.cn) [C. He] (Email: wankanglin@icdc.cn) [K. Wan]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We investigated the presence of Mycobacterium spp. in livestock in northern China. Of the 163 clinical samples selected for this study, 20 were from throat swabs of dairy cows, and 143 were tissue samples (including lung tissue from one reindeer, hilar lymph node tissue from 55 cows, and liver tissue from 87 sheep). A total of 41 mycobacterial isolates were identified including two isolates of M. caprae and 39 non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates. Multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) profiles of the two M. caprae isolates proved to be unique. This is the first report of M. caprae isolates from livestock in China. This study also confirms previous reports that NTM is common in livestock in northern China.

Type
Short Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Mycobacterium spp. are the causative agents of tuberculosis (TB) and other diseases. The main members of the genus are non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and the M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC), including M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. caprae, M. africanum, M. microti, M. canettii and M. pinnipedii. More than 125 species of NTM have been reported worldwide, of which 60 species are pathogenic to humans and/or animals [Reference Falkinham1, Reference Heifets2]. Moreover, the prevalence of M. bovis subsp. caprae has been extensively studied in France, Turkey and Spain. There have been several reports about its occurrence in animals and humans, where it is reported to account for about one-third of human M. bovis-associated cases of TB [Reference Haddad3]. The prevalence of M. caprae was 1·6% in MTBC clinical isolates from 2007 to 2010 in Turkey [Reference Bayraktar4]. In Spain, M. caprae represents 7·4% of all MTBC isolates from domestic and wild animals [Reference Rodriguez5].

A total of 68 NTM isolates were recently isolated from 1067 throat swab samples of purified protein derivative (PPD)-positive cattle in northeast and northwest China [Reference Du6], consistent with the reported prevalence of this large group of environmental mycobacteria in animals and their products [Reference Parish7]. With the emergence of drug-resistant strains and increasing numbers of self-employed, cattle-breeding households, the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in China has increased annually. The average positive rate was 5·43% and 5·83% in 1985 and 1987, respectively [Reference Du6]. More alarmingly, local epidemic surveys showed the positive rate was 12·4% in Jilin province, northern China and 8·4% in Yunnan province, southern China in 2009 [Reference Du6, Reference Zhao8]. M. bovis can be transmitted from cattle to humans through the consumption of contaminated milk and meat products [Reference Berg9]. Specific species act as a reservoir of the pathogen that can overflow to humans with zoonotic and economic consequences [Reference Chambers10]. Although PPD-positive cases have been reported in northern China and a large number of suspected animals have been slaughtered without further identification, the PPD-positive reaction associated with TB or NTM infection remains unknown. Moreover, differentiating between TB and NTM infection in suspected animals will reduce the slaughter of uninfected herds. The present study aims to identify NTM and TB infection in PPD-positive animals and in organs with TB-like lesions.

In this study, a total of 163 clinical samples collected from the PPD-positive livestock in northern China were used to isolate Mycobacterium spp. (Table 1). Of these samples, 20 throat swabs were collected from 3-year-old PPD-positive dairy cows from a Beijing suburb. Fifty-five dairy cows aged 3–5 years that were observed to have progressive weight loss, dyspnoea and reduced milk production tested positive in a skin test survey. At necropsy, swollen hilar lymph nodes were collected from dairy cows suspected of having bTB from observation at an illegal cattle slaughterhouse. Furthermore, 87 tissue specimens with tubercle-like nodules were collected during post-mortem examination at an illegal sheep slaughterhouse in Hebei province (Fig. 1). Clinically, the suspected sheep presented with progressive weight loss and respiratory diseases. In addition, one lung with hyperplastic nodules was from a PPD-positive reindeer obtained in Heilongjiang province, but no clinical signs were observed in the reindeer.

Fig. 1 [colour online]. Liver specimen showing pale and white nodules with a diameter of about 1 cm on the surface.

Table 1. Isolation and identification of Mycobacterium from clinical samples*

TB, Tuberculosis; PPD, purified protein derivative.

* Throat swab samples and tissue homogenates were liquefied, decontaminated with 4% NaOH [Reference Abe22] and neutralized with PBS. Finally the samples were centrifuged [Reference Selvakumar11], grown in modified Lowestein–Jensen medium [Reference Gortazar23] and incubated at 37 °C for 6–8 weeks as appropriate. Once an acid-fast strain was confirmed, further purification was performed on 7H10 medium.

Mycobacterium spp. were identified using standard procedures and further characterized using multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), spoligotyping and hsp65 sequence analyses. Fifteen of the 163 clinical samples were positive for the presence of Mycobacterium spp. in the primary acid-fast stain [Reference Selvakumar11], as shown in Table 1. Post-cultivation, 41 acid-fast isolates were obtained: 37 isolates from 87 liver tissue samples with TB-like lesions, two strains from 55 hilar lymph nodes of slaughtered cows, one isolate from 20 throat swabs of the PPD-positive dairy cows, and one isolate from lung tissue of a PPD-positive reindeer (Table 1).

The 41 mycobacterial isolates were identified as NTM (39) and MTBC (2) using the p-nitrobenzoic acid and thiophene-2-carboxylic acid hydrazide tests. Subsequently, speciation of these isolates was verified by multi-locus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis based on the analysis of the following target genes: 16S rRNA, Rv0577, Rv3349c, RD4, RD7, RD1 and RD12 [Reference Huard12]. NTM species were further determined by partial analysis of hsp65, based on 97% homology of the cut-off value for differentiating species [Reference McNabb13]. These NTM strains were identified as M. engbaekii (1), M. intracellulare (1), M. peregrinum (1), M. terrae (1), M. algericum (2), M. arupense (2), M. nonchromogenicum (4), M. gordonae (5), M. kumamotonense (5), and M. senuense (17) (Table 2). The phylogenetic tree based on hsp65 genes is shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that M. senuense accounted for 43·5%, indicating the most prevalent, while M. gordonae, M. kumamotonense and M. nonchromogenicum were 12·8%, 12·8% and 10·6%, respectively, in 39 NTM isolates. On the contrary, other subspecies were less prevalent in the clinical samples, such as M. engbaekii, M. intracellulare, M. peregrinum, M. terrae , M. algericum and M. arupense. Free-ranging sheep have a higher risk of exposure to environmental mycobacteria [Reference Kankya14]. Moreover, illegal slaughtering of animals in backyards and unhygienic slaughterhouses also contributes to NTM infection.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of the hsp65 gene sequences of the isolates compared to the close species using the neighbour-joining method. The tree was rooted using Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nocardia africana as outgroups. The accession number of each reference species appears within parentheses. The scale bar represents a 1% difference in nucleotide sequences.

Table 2. Gene sequencing analysis of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolates*

* A 439-bp segment of hsp65 was amplified using primers Tb11-forward (5′-ACCAACGATGGTGTGTCCAT-3′) and Tb12-reverse (5′-CTTGTCGAACCGCATACCCT-3′) [Reference Telenti24]. The above data originated from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC) database.

Interestingly, the two MTBC strains were confirmed as M. caprae (Fig. 3): one was isolated from a sheep liver and the other was from a lung sample of a PPD-positive reindeer. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the isolation of M. caprae in China.

Fig. 3. Multi-loci polymerase chain reaction (PCR) typing of mycobacterial isolates. (A) BJA10038, (B) BJA10013, (C) BJA10027, (D) H37Rv as a positive control, (E) negative control. The PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. M represents a 100-bp DNA ladder. Lanes: 1, 16S rRNA; 2, RV0577; 3, IS1561; 4, Rv1510; 5, Rv1970; 6, Rv3877/8; 7, Rv3120. The results show that BJA10013 belongs to non-tuberculous mycobacteria, while BJA10038 and BJA10027 belong to Mycobacterium caprae.

MLVA containing 15 mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units (MIRU)-variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) genetic loci was applied to investigate the molecular epidemiology of the two M. caprae strains as described previously [Reference Le15Reference Supply17]. Spoligotyping was also performed [Reference Kamerbeek18]. The results were compared using the MIRU-VNTRplus web application (http://www.miru-vntrplus.org/). This analysis showed that the two M. caprae strains had an identical MIRU-VNTR profile with the same number of tandem repeats in all 15 examined loci, namely, ETR-A (13), ETR-B (4), ETR-C (5), ETR-D (4), ETR-E (4), MIRU10 (3), MIRU16 (3), MIRU23 (3), MIRU26 (4), MIRU27 (2), MIRU39 (2), MIRU40 (2), Mtub21 (2), Mtub30 (4) and Mtub39 (2). Both M. caprae strains were identified as SpolDB4 type 647, with a spacer property of 200003777377600.

The fact that M. caprae strains were isolated from different animal species in two geographically distant provinces, suggests that M. caprae might be present in livestock in northern China. Importantly, the presence of this pathogen might pose the threat of potential transmission to humans. Indeed, there have been several reports of human TB associated with M. caprae infection in the last 10 years [Reference Cvetnic19Reference Prodinger21]. Although infectious cases of M. caprae have not been reported in humans in China, the potential for transmission from animals to humans warrants further investigation and surveillance.

There are few reports regarding NTM infection in animals in China. In this investigation, 39 NTM strains were successfully isolated from animals and identified. These NTM were isolated from tubercle-like samples and throat swabs of PPD-positive cows, suggesting the potential for misdiagnosis of bTB and NTM infections. Since NTM misdiagnosis causes unnecessary slaughter of livestock and significant economic loss for local farmers, the occurrence of NTM infection should be closely monitored by inspecting the quarantined animals when an outbreak of bTB occurs in the future.

In summary, both NTM and MTBC were isolated from livestock, although NTM was the main type of Mycobacterium isolated from tubercle-like lesions observed in clinical samples. Our study reports for the first time the isolation of M. caprae from both deer and sheep in northern China.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. This work was financially supported by the Transmission Mode of Tuberculosis project of the National Key Programme of Mega Infectious Diseases (Grant no. 2008ZX100/03-010-02) and Ministry of Science and Technology, China (Grant no. 2012AA101302-4). We also thank Professor Patrik Bavoil (Maryland University, USA), Dr Zhijun Zhang and Dr Wanyong Pang (senior scientists at Sanofi Aventis China) for correction of the manuscript.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Falkinham, JO 3rd. Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2009; 107: 356367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Heifets, L. Mycobacterial infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2004; 25: 283295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Haddad, N, et al. Spoligotype diversity of Mycobacterium bovis strains isolated in france from 1979 to 2000. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 36233632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Bayraktar, B, et al. Species distribution of the mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical isolates from 2007 to 2010 in turkey: a prospective study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2011; 49: 38373841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Rodriguez, S, et al. Mycobacterium caprae infection in livestock and wildlife, Spain. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 532535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Du, Y, et al. Molecular characterization of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) isolated from cattle in northeast and northwest china. Research in Veterinary Science 2011; 90: 385391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Parish, T. Mycobacterium: Molecular Microbiology: Wymondham, Norfolk, UK: Horizon Bioscience, 2005.Google Scholar
8.Zhao, D. The harm of bovine tuberculosis and the epidemiological situation in China. Veterinary Orientation 2011: 43.Google Scholar
9.Berg, S, et al. The burden of mycobacterial disease in ethiopian cattle: implications for public health. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e5068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Chambers, MA. Review of the diagnosis and study of tuberculosis in non-bovine wildlife species using immunological methods. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 2009; 56: 215227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Selvakumar, N, et al. Sensitivity of Ziehl-Neelsen method for centrifuged deposit smears of sputum samples transported in cetyl-pyridinium chloride. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2006; 124: 439442.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Huard, RC, et al. PCR-based method to differentiate the subspecies of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex on the basis of genomic deletions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 16371650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.McNabb, A, et al. Assessment of partial sequencing of the 65-kilodalton heat shock protein gene (hsp65) for routine identification of mycobacterium species isolated from clinical sources. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42: 30003011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Kankya, C, et al. Isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria from pastoral ecosystems of Uganda: public health significance. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Le, Fleche P, et al. High resolution, on-line identification of strains from the mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on tandem repeat typing. BMC Microbiology 2002; 2: 37.Google Scholar
16.Skuce, RA, et al. Discrimination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria using novel VNTR-PCR targets. Microbiology 2002; 148: 519528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Supply, P, et al. Automated high-throughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of mycobacterium tuberculosis based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 35633571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Kamerbeek, J, et al. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1997; 35: 907914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Cvetnic, Z, et al. Mycobacterium caprae in cattle and humans in croatia. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2007; 11: 652658.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Kubica, T, Rusch-Gerdes, S, Niemann, S. Mycobacterium bovis subsp. caprae caused one-third of human M. bovis-associated tuberculosis cases reported in Germany between 1999 and 2001. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 30703077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Prodinger, WM, et al. Infection of red deer, cattle, and humans with Mycobacterium bovis subsp. caprae in western Austria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 22702272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Abe, C, et al. Comparison of MB-check, bactec, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992; 30: 878881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Gortazar, C, et al. Fine-tuning the space, time, and host distribution of mycobacteria in wildlife. BMC Microbiology 2011; 11: 27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Telenti, A, et al. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993; 31: 175178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 [colour online]. Liver specimen showing pale and white nodules with a diameter of about 1 cm on the surface.

Figure 1

Table 1. Isolation and identification of Mycobacterium from clinical samples*

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of the hsp65 gene sequences of the isolates compared to the close species using the neighbour-joining method. The tree was rooted using Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nocardia africana as outgroups. The accession number of each reference species appears within parentheses. The scale bar represents a 1% difference in nucleotide sequences.

Figure 3

Table 2. Gene sequencing analysis of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolates*

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Multi-loci polymerase chain reaction (PCR) typing of mycobacterial isolates. (A) BJA10038, (B) BJA10013, (C) BJA10027, (D) H37Rv as a positive control, (E) negative control. The PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. M represents a 100-bp DNA ladder. Lanes: 1, 16S rRNA; 2, RV0577; 3, IS1561; 4, Rv1510; 5, Rv1970; 6, Rv3877/8; 7, Rv3120. The results show that BJA10013 belongs to non-tuberculous mycobacteria, while BJA10038 and BJA10027 belong to Mycobacterium caprae.