Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T15:21:29.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Såli (Micronesian starling – Aplonis opaca) as a key seed dispersal agent across a tropical archipelago

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2020

Henry S. Pollock*
Affiliation:
School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523
Evan C. Fricke
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 50010
Evan M. Rehm
Affiliation:
Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA80523
Martin Kastner
Affiliation:
School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523
Nicole Suckow
Affiliation:
School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523
Julie A. Savidge
Affiliation:
Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA80523
Haldre S. Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 50010
*
*Author for correspondence: Henry S. Pollock, Email: henry.s.pollock@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed dispersal is an important ecological process that structures plant communities and influences ecosystem functioning. Loss of animal dispersers therefore poses a serious threat to forest ecosystems, particularly in the tropics where zoochory predominates. A prominent example is the near-total extinction of seed dispersers on the tropical island of Guam following the accidental introduction of the invasive brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis), negatively impacting seedling recruitment and forest regeneration. We investigated frugivory by a remnant population of Såli (Micronesian starling – Aplonis opaca) on Guam and two other island populations (Rota, Saipan) to evaluate their ecological role as a seed disperser in the Mariana archipelago. Using a combination of behavioural observations, nest contents and fecal samples, we documented frugivory of 37 plant species. Native plants comprised the majority (66%) of all species and 90% of all seeds identified in fecal and nest contents. Diet was highly similar across age classes and sampling years. In addition, plant species consumed by Såli comprised 88% of bird-dispersed adult trees and 54% of all adult trees in long-term forest monitoring plots, demonstrating the Såli’s broad diet and potential for restoring native forests. Overall, we provide the most comprehensive assessment to date of frugivory by the Såli and confirm its importance as a seed disperser on Guam and throughout the Marianas.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020

Introduction

Seed dispersal is a key ecological process that influences plant community structure (Levine & Murrell Reference Levine and Murrell2003) and helps maintain plant diversity (Wandrag et al. Reference Wandrag, Dunham, Duncan and Rogers2017). Mechanistically, dispersal allows seeds to escape their parent plant, reducing competition and density-dependent mortality and enhancing survival and recruitment of new individuals into the population (Harms et al. Reference Harms, Wright, Calderón, Hernández and Herre2000, Schupp Reference Schupp1992). Furthermore, dispersal promotes colonization of new sites, gene flow among plant populations (Hamilton Reference Hamilton1999) and regeneration of degraded habitats (Wunderle Reference Wunderle1997). Thus, seed dispersers provide a function that is an essential to the ecology of forests (Kunz et al. Reference Kunz, Braun de Torrez, Bauer, Lobova and Fleming2011, Şekercioğlu Reference Şekercioğlu2006, Stratford and Şekercioğlu Reference Stratford, Şekercioğlu, Peh, Corlett and Bergeron2015, Whelan et al. Reference Whelan, Wenny and Marquis2008), especially in the tropics where zoochory is the predominant mode of seed dispersal (Howe & Smallwood Reference Howe and Smallwood1982).

Loss of seed dispersers can have detrimental impacts on plant communities (Farwig and Berens Reference Farwig and Berens2012, Hansen and Galetti Reference Hansen and Galetti2009, Melo et al. Reference Melo, Martínez-Salas, Benítez-Malvido and Ceballos2010). One of the most extreme examples of cascading effects of disperser loss on forest structure and function is from the tropical island of Guam in the Western Pacific. Virtually all of Guam’s native frugivores were extirpated by the invasive, predatory brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis) following its introduction to the island shortly after the First World War (Fritts & Rodda Reference Fritts and Rodda1998, Rodda et al. Reference Rodda, Fritts and Conry1992, Savidge Reference Savidge1987). Cascading impacts of frugivore loss on Guam include reduced seedling survival and recruitment, altered spatial distributions of native tree species, reduced local species richness and slower rates of forest regeneration relative to neighbouring islands with intact bird communities (Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Buhle, HilleRisLambers, Fricke, Miller and Tewksbury2017, Wandrag et al. Reference Wandrag, Dunham, Duncan and Rogers2017).

The only remaining native avian frugivore on Guam is the Såli (Micronesian starling – Aplonis opaca), a medium-sized (~80g) passerine bird in the family Sturnidae. The Såli has a broad geographic distribution across Micronesia, with resident subspecies unique to each of the major island groups of Palau, the Mariana Islands and the Caroline Islands (Craig & Feare Reference Craig, Feare, del Hoyo, Elliott, Sargatal, Christie and de Juana2018). They have large home-ranges (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Balsat, Lemoine and Savidge2018a), use a variety of habitat types and cross ecotones frequently (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Chojnacki, Rogers and Savidge2018b), and disperse seeds at relatively large spatial scales (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Fricke, Bender, Savidge and Rogers2019), illustrating their capacity to move seeds around the landscape, particularly from native forests to degraded habitats. Although their diet has never been described quantitatively, Såli are thought to be omnivorous and have been observed eating arthropods, small vertebrates and even seabird eggs (Engbring & Ramsey Reference Engbring and Ramsey1984, Reichel & Glass Reference Reichel and Glass1990). However, fruit is a primary component of the diet (Craig & Feare Reference Craig, Feare, del Hoyo, Elliott, Sargatal, Christie and de Juana2018), and anecdotal feeding observations have identified at least 19 plant species consumed by Såli (Baker Reference Baker1951, Craig Reference Craig1996, Engbring & Ramsey Reference Engbring and Ramsey1984, Jenkins Reference Jenkins1983, Marshall Reference Marshall1949, Marshall & Fosberg Reference Marshall and Fosberg1975). Furthermore, they have been recorded eating both native and exotic fruits (e.g. Jenkins Reference Jenkins1983), although the prevalence of native vs non-native fruits in their diet is unknown. A comprehensive look at frugivory and seed dispersal by the Såli will shed light on its ecological role in the forests of the Mariana archipelago. Furthermore, because small or restricted populations often exhibit cryptic function loss (McConkey & O’Farrill Reference McConkey and O’Farrill2015), understanding the Såli’s diet on Guam may help elucidate whether or not the island's remnant population is contributing seed dispersal services to Guam’s otherwise defaunated forests.

In this study, we employed a combination of systematic and opportunistic observations of Såli at fruiting trees, fecal samples collected from wild-caught birds, and seeds found within nests to investigate frugivory by Såli on three islands (Saipan, Rota, Guam) in the Mariana archipelago. Our primary goal was to provide a more complete picture of its role as a frugivore, with a particular focus on native versus non-native fruits in the diet. We compared dietary information collected in behavioural observations to that based on fecal samples and nest contents to provide a more complete characterization of dietary breadth. Finally, on Guam, we explored seasonal and age-specific (i.e. nestling vs adult) dietary patterns to determine if the Såli’s functional role as a disperser varied between years or among age classes.

Methods

Study sites

We investigated Såli diet on three islands (Saipan, Guam, Rota) in the Mariana archipelago (Figure 1). Guam is the largest of the three (541 km2), followed by Saipan (115 km2) and Rota (85 km2). The islands are all within 200 km of each other and experience similar temperature and rainfall regimes, with little annual temperature variation and pronounced dry (December–June) and wet seasons (July–November). Unlike Guam, Saipan and Rota have not been invaded by the brown tree snake and still have relatively intact bird communities (Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Buhle, HilleRisLambers, Fricke, Miller and Tewksbury2017, Wiles Reference Wiles2005). On Saipan and Rota, we observed Såli in limestone karst forests of similar plant community composition (see Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Balsat, Lemoine and Savidge2018a and Fricke et al. Reference Fricke, Tewksbury and Rogers2018 for details). We studied Såli on Andersen Air Force Base in northern Guam, an 8100-ha military installation where the majority (>99%) of the island's remaining Såli population is concentrated. Our study area included limestone forest along the eastern edge of the base and an urban housing area comprised of large tracts of lawn with isolated trees and a golf course (see Pollock et al. Reference Pollock, Savidge, Kastner, Seibert and Jones2019 for details).

Figure 1. Map of the southernmost islands of the Mariana archipelago where the study was conducted. Inset indicates the location of the Mariana Islands (M.I., delineated by the green rectangle) relative to the closest land masses, Japan and the Philippine Islands (P.I.).

Literature review

To assess the current state of knowledge on Såli frugivory, we conducted a literature search on Web of Science and Google Scholar in March 2019 using all combinations of the keywords ‘Såli’, ‘Micronesian Starling’ or ‘Aplonis opaca’, with ‘Mariana Islands’, ‘diet’, ‘fruit’, ‘frugivory’ and ‘seed dispersal’. We then compiled dietary information (based exclusively on behavioural observations of Såli at fruiting trees – the only data available in the literature) into a summary table (Table 1), which we used as a reference to contextualize our own dietary characterization.

Table 1. List of plant species consumed by Såli (Aplonis opaca) based on historical observations from throughout Micronesia (n = 19) and in this study (n = 37) based on behavioural observations, fecal samples and nest contents from three islands (Saipan – S, Guam – G, Rota – R) in the Mariana archipelago. Historical observations were compiled from the published literature and include the locality where the observation occurred and the reference in which observational data were presented. Plant species identified in this study from behavioural observations of Såli are indicated with a “+” under the island where observations occurred. Seeds identified from fecal samples on Saipan (n = 20 samples, 354 seeds) and Guam (n = 403 samples, 25 967 seeds) and nest contents on Guam only (n = 49 samples, 728 seeds) include the proportion of samples in which the given species was present

a Plant species with seedless fruit or seeds that are too large to be dispersed via endozoochory (i.e. gut-passage or regurgitation). On Guam, we observed Såli consuming the flesh of broken Cocos nucifera fruits that had fallen to the ground.

b Fruiting trees of these species were monitored on Saipan and Rota from 2013–2016 but were never observed being visited by Såli.

c Plant species that are endemic to the Mariana Islands. We were not able to distinguish between the seeds of the three Eugenia species (E. palumbis, E. reinwardtiana, E. bryanii), but E. palumbis and E. bryanii are endemic.

d Fleshy-fruited plant species present in 60 × 60 m long-term census plots on Saipan, Guam and Rota.

Diet sampling

We used three complementary approaches to characterize the diet of the Såli. First, we collected behavioural observations of Såli consuming fruit. On Guam, we recorded opportunistic observations in limestone forest and developed areas on Andersen Air Force Base from 2017–2018. On Saipan and Rota, we collected timed behavioural observations of fruiting trees from 20 fleshy-fruited tree species (see Table 1, Fricke et al. Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019) in limestone forest from 2013–2015. Following methods described in Fricke et al. (Reference Fricke, Tewksbury, Wandrag and Rogers2017, Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019), observers recorded interactions where seeds were consumed or taken away from the canopy at fruiting trees, with an average of 400 hours of observation per tree species (Fricke et al. Reference Fricke, Tewksbury, Wandrag and Rogers2017). Because we did not account for sampling effort in our behavioural observations on Guam, we present these data as presence-absence of a given tree species in the Såli diet on each island, and refrain from quantitative comparisons between islands.

Second, we collected fecal samples on Saipan in 2015–2016 and Guam in 2017–2018 to identify seeds dispersed through endozoochory. To obtain fecal samples, we captured Såli using mist-nets erected on trails within native limestone forest and at forest ecotones where forest transitions into non-native habitats (e.g. grasslands or urban areas). Mist-nets were double-high (i.e. 6 m) and we used a pulley system to raise nets level with the forest canopy. We opened between 2–4 nets at sunrise and closed nets no later than 1100h to avoid capturing birds in the heat of the day. We used speakers to broadcast playback of conspecific vocalizations and attract juvenile and adult birds. Following capture, we placed birds in cloth bags and waited for them to defecate. If birds did not defecate within 30 min, we released them at the site of capture. We collected fecal samples in glass vials and transported them back to the laboratory for sorting. On Guam, we also obtained fecal samples by trapping both breeding adults and nestlings in nest boxes (n = 31 boxes), which were deployed throughout the urban area as part of an effort to improve nest survival. Såli exhibit some breeding seasonality (i.e. active nests are less common in the months of October–December) but have been recorded breeding in every month of the year on Guam (J.A. Savidge, unpublished data). We trapped incubating adults at dawn by covering the entrance of the nest box with a hand net and flushing them, while nestlings were removed from the nest by hand during daylight hours. We also surveyed for presence-absence of arthropods in all fecal samples.

Third, we collected and sorted through nest box contents on Guam following each completed nesting attempt from July–September 2018 to identify the seeds that had been defecated or regurgitated inside the box. We removed entire nests from boxes and froze them to kill feather mites and other nest parasites. We then used a sieve to remove all non-seed nesting material and sorted the dry seeds. We also surveyed for presence-absence of arthropods in all nest contents. To identify seeds from fecal samples and nest contents, we collected voucher samples from the wild to create a seed library, which we used along with the help of botanists to cross-reference with seeds that we found in our samples.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted in R version 3.3.3 (R Core Team 2017). We combined all plant species detected in our tripartite approach (i.e. behavioural observations, fecal samples, nest contents) across all islands with the list of plant species compiled from the literature review to create a comprehensive list of species dispersed by Såli. We also compared the observed Såli diet to plant species assemblages from 60 × 60 m long-term census plots located on Saipan (n = 3) and Guam (n = 4; see Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Buhle, HilleRisLambers, Fricke, Miller and Tewksbury2017 for details) to determine the proportion of fleshy-fruited plant species consumed by Såli in limestone forest.

To explore variation in diet across age classes (nestlings versus juveniles/adults) and years (2017 versus 2018), we focused on fecal samples from Guam, the only island where we had sufficient data to quantitatively assess these patterns. We excluded nest box contents given that they were only collected in 2018 and were not able to be classified to age due to shared use of nest boxes by nestlings and adults. To quantify year and age-specific variation in diet, we first calculated proportional presence of each species in fecal samples (i.e. total number of samples with species present/total number of samples) for each year and age class. We ran linear regressions using the proportional data for year (i.e. proportional presence of a given species in 2017 as the predictor variable and proportional presence in 2018 as the response variable) or age class (i.e. proportional presence of a given species in adult/juvenile diet as the predictor variable and proportional presence in nestling diet as the response variable). We verified that residuals for both regression were normally distributed. We then plotted the proportional data for (1) 2017 vs 2018 and (2) adults/juveniles vs nestlings to explore shifts in frequency of occurrence between years and age classes of the different plant species in the fecal samples. We used the coefficient of determination (R2) as a metric of diet similarity, with the unity line (i.e. slope = 1, R2 = 1) representing identical diets between the years or age classes. We then visually inspected plots for deviations from unity to detect dietary differences between years and age classes. We also generated bar charts using the proportional metric to visually compare diets between years and age classes.

Results

Overall dietary characterization

From existing literature, we compiled a list of 19 (eight native, 42%; 11 non-native, 58%) plant species that Såli have been observed consuming throughout Micronesia (Table 1). All but one of these species (Crateva speciosa) is present in the Mariana Islands. Combining our three different approaches (behavioural observations, fecal samples, nest contents), we documented frugivory of 37 (22 native, 15 non-native) plant species (22 trees, 10 shrubs, five vines; Table 1). Of these 37 species, 15 were previously recognized as part of the Såli diet based on our literature review. We thus report the first record of Såli frugivory for 22 plant species (Table 1), including 15 (68%) native (of which nine are endemic) and seven (32%) non-native species. Finally, Såli consumed the majority of fleshy-fruited species in limestone forests in the Marianas; plant species observed to be dispersed by Såli comprised 88% of bird-dispersed adult stems and 54% of all adult stems in the forest monitoring plots (Table 1).

Behavioural observations

We observed frugivory of 21 species (13 native, eight non-native) in our combined behavioural observations of Såli from Guam (n = 17), Saipan (n = 9) and Rota (n = 8), including 11 previously undocumented species (Table 1). Seven species (Aglaia mariannensis, Artocarpus mariannensis, Ficus spp., Melanolepis multiglandulosa, Pipturus argenteus, Premna serratifolia, Carica papaya) were seen being consumed on multiple islands (Table 1).

Fecal samples

On Saipan, we collected fecal samples from 28 individuals (23 adults, 5 juveniles), 20 (71.4%) of which contained seeds (Supplementary Table 1). On Guam, we collected fecal samples from 403 individuals (384 nestlings, 12 adults, seven juveniles; Supplementary Table 1), 375 (93.1%) of which contained seeds. We positively identified all seeds (n = 354 seeds, seven species) found in fecal samples on Saipan. On Guam, we positively identified 97.5% (n = 25 967 seeds, 25 species) of total seeds. The vast majority of identified seeds on Guam (96.7% by seed number; 56% by species) and Saipan (86.1% by number; 71% by species) were from native plants, including nine species endemic to the Mariana Islands (Table 1). All seven species found in fecal samples on Saipan were nested within samples from Guam (Table 1). However, commonness of species in the diet varied between Guam and Saipan. On Guam, the three most common species were the native trees P. serratifolia (51%), Ficus spp. (39%) and M. multiglandulosa (36%), compared with Ficus spp. (52%), the invasive vine Coccinia grandis (29%) and the native tree Psychotria mariana (14%) on Saipan (Table 1).

Nest contents

We collected nesting material from 49 Såli nests (collected from 31 nest boxes) on Guam, all of which contained seeds. We positively identified 97.0% (n = 728 seeds, 31 species; Supplementary Table 1) of all seeds, of which 400 seeds (60.4%) and 19 species (61.2%) were native (Table 1; Supplementary Table 1). The most common native species based on frequency of occurrence were M. multiglandulosa (present in 73% of nest boxes), P. serratifolia (61%), Morinda citrifolia (60%) and Flagellaria indica (53%) and the most common non-native species was Vitex parviflora (59%).

Method comparison

Combining data from all three islands, we documented 31 species (19 native, 12 non-native) in nest contents and 25 species (14 native, 11 non-native) in fecal samples, as well as frugivory of 21 species (13 native, eight non-native) through behavioural observations. The 25 species identified in fecal samples were nested within the 31 species found in nest contents, all of which were dispersed via endozoochory (i.e. gut passage or regurgitation). The size (i.e. seed volume) threshold for gut passage was ~150 mm3 – the size of the largest seed found in fecal samples (Meiogyne cylindrocarpa). We were unable to determine the size threshold for regurgitation, but the largest seed found in nest boxes was Annona squamosa (~230 mm3). Despite the species nestedness of fecal samples with respect to nest contents, frequency of occurrence of seeds differed considerably between the two sampling methods for many plant species (e.g. V. parviflora on Guam: 59% in nest contents, 3% in fecal samples; F. indica on Guam: 53% in nest contents, 1% in fecal samples). Furthermore, on Guam arthropods occurred more frequently in fecal samples (83.9% in 2017, 69.2% in 2018) than in nest contents (n = 3 nests; 6.1%). Finally, behavioural observations revealed a unique component of the diet – plant species (n = 6) with edible pericarps whose seeds were too large to be dispersed via endozoochory (Table 1).

Seasonal, annual and age-specific patterns of frugivory

We found little evidence of seasonality in diet based on fecal samples from Guam. Most species of seeds occurred idiosyncratically in fecal samples throughout a given year. For example, in 2017, Macaranga thompsonii occurrence peaked in May and then declined to zero in July and did not occur again until October. In contrast, in 2018, this pattern was reversed, with M. thompsonii increasing steadily throughout the season and peaking in August (Supplementary Figure 1). However some species did exhibit consistent seasonal changes, such as P. serratifolia, which peaked in April with a secondary peak in July in both years (Supplementary Figure 1). Diet remained highly consistent on Guam between the two sampling years (R2 = 0.83, Figure 2), with four of the same five native species (P. serratifolia, M. multiglandulosa, Ficus spp., M. thompsonii) among the most common in both years (Fig. 2). With respect to age class, the juvenile/adult diet was fully nested within and also similar to the nestling diet (R2 = 0.30, Figure 3), although several exotic species (e.g. C. papaya, C. grandis) were more common and several native species were less common (e.g. P. argenteus, M. thompsonii) in the adult diet compared with the nestling diet. Carica papaya was a particularly extreme exception, as it was consumed frequently by adults/juveniles and rarely by nestlings; when C. papaya was excluded from the data, the coefficient of determination between adult/juvenile and nestling diets increased to R2 = 0.82, indicating a highly consistent diet between age classes.

Figure 2. Frequency of occurrence of seeds of tree species found in fecal samples of Såli (Micronesian starling – Aplonis opaca) on Guam, USA in 2017 (n = 242 samples, blue bars) and 2018 (n = 161 samples, red bars). Inset is a linear regression of 2017 vs 2018 proportions, including a line with slope of 1 (indicating a 1:1 ratio of frequency of occurrence between years).

Figure 3. Frequency of occurrence of seeds of tree species found in fecal samples of adult/juvenile (n = 19) and nestling (n = 382) Såli (Micronesian starling – Aplonis opaca) on Guam, USA in 2017–2018. Inset is a linear regression of juvenile/adult vs nestling proportions, including a line with slope of 1 (indicating a 1:1 ratio of frequency of occurrence between age classes). One outlier species (Carica papaya) is indicated by the black arrow.

Discussion

We present the first systematic characterization of frugivory by Såli in the Mariana Islands. Using a combination of behavioural observations, fecal samples and nest contents, we demonstrated that Såli consume fruits from a broad variety of herbaceous, shrub, vine and tree species. Moreover, we found that Såli eat and likely act as dispersers for at least three-quarters of the fleshy-fruited plant species present in long-term forest plots across the islands. Finally, diet was similar across years and age classes. Our data suggest that Såli are generalists whose dietary patterns are influenced by abundance and/or phenology of plant species on the landscape. Despite this cosmopolitan diet, both the majority of species and the total number of seeds consumed by Såli were native. Different methods yielded complementary dietary information – behavioural observations revealed frugivory of plant species whose fruits and/or seeds were too large for gut passage or regurgitation and therefore not detected in fecal samples or nest contents. Together, these complementary methods produce an integrative picture of Såli frugivory and highlight the importance of its role as a seed disperser and its potential for restoring native forests in the Marianas.

Overall, we documented frugivory of 37 tree species (22 native, 15 non-native) across the three islands, nearly doubling the previously known plant-based diet. Såli were dietary generalists and consumed the majority of bird-dispersed tree species present in limestone forest plots. The diet breadth of the Såli is consistent with recent evidence demonstrating that among frugivorous birds, tropical species tend to be more highly specialized on fruit and therefore require a greater variety of food plant species than temperate species (Dalsgaard et al. Reference Dalsgaard, Schleuning, Maruyama, Dehling, Sonne, Vizentin‐Bugoni, Zanata, Fjeldså, Böhning‐Gaese and Rahbek2017). Similarly, other species of starlings (family Sturnidae) have cosmopolitan diets and consume large quantities of fruit (e.g. LaFleur et al. Reference LaFleur, Rubega and Parent2009, Yoshikawa & Isagi Reference Yoshikawa and Isagi2012). Importantly, the vast majority of total seeds found in fecal samples were from native plants on Guam (97%) and Saipan (86%), and our combined methodologies revealed nine previously undocumented species endemic to the Marianas. Indeed, one of these species, Tabernaemontana rotensis, is a federally listed, threatened species in the Marianas (Marler et al. Reference Marler, Cascasan and Lawrence2015) yet was moderately common (14% of samples) in nest contents. In contrast, previous research has highlighted the propensity of other starling species to consume and disperse invasive plants (Jordaan et al. Reference Jordaan, Johnson and Downs2011, LaFleur et al. Reference Lafleur, Rubega and Elphick2007, Reference LaFleur, Rubega and Parent2009). To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the importance of a starling as a mutualist for rare plant species.

Nevertheless, Såli are also consuming and dispersing a variety of non-natives and invasives. For example, on Guam, several highly invasive plant species were fairly common in nest contents, including V. parviflora (59%), Passiflora suberosa (37%) and Triphasia trifolia (29%; Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER), US Forest Service 2018). Similarly, on Saipan, 29% of fecal samples contained C. grandis, a widespread invasive that has had detrimental impacts on native plant communities in the Marianas (Raman et al. Reference Raman, Cruz, Muniappan and Reddy2007, Space & Falanruw Reference Space and Falanruw1999). Thus, the Såli’s ecological role as a seed disperser is not wholly positive, but rather nuanced and likely dependent on the abundance of non-natives across the islands. However, the Såli is not unique in this matter, since all native frugivores in the Marianas also consume and disperse non-native plants (Craig Reference Craig1996, Jenkins Reference Jenkins1983, Wiles & Johnson Reference Wiles and Johnson2004). Overall, their broad diet, long-range movements (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Fricke, Bender, Savidge and Rogers2019), positive impact on gut passage (Fricke et al. Reference Fricke, Tewksbury and Rogers2018), and frequent ecotone crossings (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Chojnacki, Rogers and Savidge2018b) would make Såli an excellent candidate for restoring dispersal to Guam’s forests if their range on the island could be expanded through the implementation of existing or novel brown tree snake control methods.

Age-specific and annual dietary patterns of Såli on Guam indicate that all age classes are at least partially frugivorous throughout the year. However, Såli also consumed arthropods, which were present in most fecal samples (84% in 2017; 70% in 2018). The adult/juvenile diet was fully nested within nestling diet (likely an artifact of small sample size of adult/juvenile fecal samples; n = 19, Figure 3). The fruit-based diet was qualitatively (i.e. overall species richness) and quantitatively (i.e. frequency of occurrence) similar across years both, with the same native species (P. serratifolia, Ficus spp., M. multiglandulosa, P. argenteus, M. thompsonii) dominating the diet (Figure 2). These data suggest that Såli are tracking abundant and reliable sources of fruit, a common behaviour of tropical frugivorous birds (Saracco et al. Reference Saracco, Collazo and Groom2004). Indeed, Såli have minimal competition for food resources on Guam and thus may be able to select their preferred food plants, so their diet on Guam is likely unconstrained relative to their diet on nearby islands. However, testing this hypothesis would require detailed information on variation in fruiting tree abundance and/or phenology on a landscape level across multiple islands (Kimura et al. Reference Kimura, Yumoto and Kikuzawa2001), and we do not currently have those data for this system.

Behavioural observations, fecal samples and nest contents allowed us to more fully characterize patterns of frugivory and provided complementary information about different components of the Såli diet. Fecal samples and nest contents shed light on the food plants that Såli disperse via endozoochory. Seeds found in fecal samples were defecated, whereas seeds found in nest boxes were either defecated or regurgitated. Regardless of the mechanism, gut passage has been shown to improve seedling germination success, especially in the tropics (Traveset Reference Traveset1998, Traveset et al. Reference Traveset, Robertson, Rodríguez-Pérez, Dennis, Green and Schupp2007) and in the Marianas (Fricke et al. Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019), further contextualizing the importance of Såli as seed dispersers. Nevertheless, we also documented important differences in plant species’ frequency of occurrence between fecal samples and nest contents. For example, all but one (C. grandis) of the 11 non-native species found in both fecal samples and nest contents on Guam occurred more frequently in the nest contents. These patterns were driven by seed size – many of the non-natives consumed by Såli have larger seeds and were therefore more likely to be regurgitated than gut-passed (e.g. V. parviflora, which was present in 1% of fecal samples versus 59% of nest contents). Conversely, arthropods occurred far more frequently in fecal samples (>70%) than in nest contents (~6%), further highlighting the differences between the methods. Perhaps most importantly, nest contents (n = 31 species) provided more dietary information than fecal samples (n = 25 species) in a shorter period of time (i.e. months vs years), demonstrating their utility as a sampling method (Wheelwright et al. Reference Wheelwright, Haber, Murray and Guindon1984). Even so, both of these methods omitted a subset of plant species with seeds too large to be dispersed via endozoochory (e.g. Cocos nucifera, Areca catechu), which were only detected in behavioural observations. Our behavioural approach using direct observation of focal tree canopies could determine interactions with seeds of any size, but can only reveal interactions between frugivores and the subset of plant species that are the focus of the observations. Our results reinforce the notion that no single method provides a complete picture of a frugivore’s diet (Rosenberg & Cooper Reference Rosenberg and Cooper1990) and highlight the need for complementary sampling approaches to fully characterize diet breadth and understand a frugivore’s ecological role as a seed disperser.

Our findings bolster the emerging picture of Såli as a key disperser in forests of the Mariana Islands. Såli have the largest home-range of any of the archipelago’s avian frugivores (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Chojnacki, Rogers and Savidge2018b) and the greatest potential for long-distance dispersal (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Fricke, Bender, Savidge and Rogers2019). Furthermore, Såli cross ecotones more than other frugivorous birds and are thought to contribute disproportionately to restoration of degraded habitats (Rehm et al. Reference Rehm, Balsat, Lemoine and Savidge2018a). Finally, they have generally positive impacts on germination on a broad array of native plant species (Fricke et al. Reference Fricke, Bender, Rehm and Rogers2019). With their broad diet and propensity to disperse native and endemic plant species, Såli are a critical agent for restoring seed dispersal to Guam’s forests and maintaining ecosystem functioning throughout the Marianas and Micronesia as a whole.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467419000361

Acknowledgements

We thank the many field assistants who spent countless hours sorting through fecal samples under the microscope, including Ovidio Jaramillo, Megan Pendred, Bridget Strejc, Carolin Tappe, Chris Wagner, Janelle Chojnacki, Mallory Balsat, Kate Beer, Chelsey Hunts, Danny Farrar and Leah Harper; the experts who helped us with seed identification, including John Bender, Tony Castro, Ann Marie Gawel, Lauren Gutierrez and Meg Kargul; Dana Lujan, Shermaine Garcia, Jim Watkins, Aaron Rieffenaugh and Mary Jo Mazurek for logistical assistance with permits and access to Andersen Air Force Base. All research was approved by the Guam Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Division of Fish and Wildlife and Colorado State University Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #17-7176A).

Financial support

This research was funded by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program and the US Army Corps of Engineers under Contract No. W912HQ16C0013 (Project RC-2441), and the U.S. Navy, Joint Region Marianas, Guam.

References

Literature cited

Baker, RH (1951) The avifauna of Micronesia, its origin, evolution, and distribution. University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History 3, 1359.Google Scholar
Craig, A and Feare, C (2018) Micronesian starling (Aplonis opaca). In del Hoyo, JA, Elliott, A, Sargatal, J, Christie, DA and de Juana, E (eds), Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Craig, RJ (1996) Seasonal population surveys and natural history of a Micronesian bird community. Wilson Bulletin 108, 246267.Google Scholar
Dalsgaard, B, Schleuning, M, Maruyama, PK, Dehling, DM, Sonne, J, Vizentin‐Bugoni, J, Zanata, TB, Fjeldså, J, Böhning‐Gaese, K and Rahbek, C (2017) Opposed latitudinal patterns of network‐derived and dietary specialization in avian plant–frugivore interaction systems. Ecography 40, 13951401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerer, MH, Fricke, EC and Rogers, HS (2018) Seed dispersal as an ecosystem service: frugivore loss leads to decline of a socially valued plant, Capsicum frutescens. Ecological Applications 28, 655667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engbring, J and Ramsey, EL (1984) Distribution and abundance of the forest birds of Guam: results of a 1981 survey. U.S. Fish and Wildife Services Publications FWSIOBS-84120.Google Scholar
Farwig, N and Berens, DG (2012) Imagine a world without seed dispersers: a review of threats, consequences and future directions. Basic and Applied Ecology 13, 109115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, EC, Tewksbury, JJ, Wandrag, EM and Rogers, HS (2017) Mutualistic strategies minimize coextinction in plant–disperser networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, 20162302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, EC, Tewksbury, JJ and Rogers, HS (2018) Defaunation leads to interaction deficits, not interaction compensation, in an island seed dispersal network. Global Change Biology 24, e190e200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricke, EC, Bender, J, Rehm, EM and Rogers, HS (2019) Functional outcomes of mutualistic network interactions: a community‐scale study of frugivore gut passage on germination. Journal of Ecology 107, 757767.Google Scholar
Fritts, TH and Rodda, GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 113140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, MB (1999) Tropical tree gene flow and seed dispersal. Nature 401, 129130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, DM and Galetti, M (2009) The forgotten megafauna. Science 324, 4243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harms, KE, Wright, SJ, Calderón, O, Hernández, A and Herre, EA (2000) Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature 404, 493495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, HF and Smallwood, J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13, 201228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, JM (1983) The native forest birds of Guam. Ornithological Monographs 31, 161.Google Scholar
Jordaan, LA, Johnson, SD and Downs, CT (2011) The role of avian frugivores in germination of seeds of fleshy-fruited invasive alien plants. Biological Invasions 13, 19171930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, K, Yumoto, T and Kikuzawa, K (2001) Fruiting phenology of fleshy-fruited plants and seasonal dynamics of frugivorous birds in four vegetation zones on Mt. Kinabalu, Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17, 833858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, TH, Braun de Torrez, E, Bauer, D, Lobova, T and Fleming, TH (2011) Ecosystem services provided by bats. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223, 138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafleur, NE, Rubega, MA and Elphick, CS (2007) Invasive fruits, novel foods, and choice: an investigation of European starling and American robin frugivory. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119, 429439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFleur, N, Rubega, M, and Parent, J (2009) Does frugivory by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) facilitate germination in invasive plants? Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 136, 332341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, JM and Murrell, DJ (2003) The community-level consequences of seed dispersal patterns. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34, 549574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, TE, Cascasan, A and Lawrence, JH (2015) Threatened native trees in Guam: short-term seed storage and shade conditions influence emergence and growth of seedlings. Horticultural Science 50, 10491054.Google Scholar
Marshall, JT (1949) The endemic avifauna of Saipan, Tinian, Guam, and Palau. The Condor 51, 200221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M and Fosberg, FR (1975) The natural history of Namoluk Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands. Atoll Research Bulletin 189, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConkey, KR and O’Farrill, G (2015) Cryptic function loss in animal populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30, 182189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melo, FP, Martínez-Salas, E, Benítez-Malvido, J and Ceballos, G (2010) Forest fragmentation reduces recruitment of large-seeded tree species in a semi-deciduous tropical forest of southern Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26, 3543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, HS, Savidge, JA, Kastner, MR, Seibert, T and Jones, TM (2019) Pervasive impacts of an invasive predator drive low fledgling survival in an endangered island bird population. The Condor 121, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER), US Forest Service (2018) Online resource at http://www.hear.org/pier/.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Raman, A, Cruz, ZT, Muniappan, R and Reddy, GV (2007) Biology and host specificity of gall-inducing Acythopeus burkhartorum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a biological-control agent for the invasive weed Coccinia grandis (Cucurbitaceae) in Guam and Saipan. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 150, 181191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, EM, Balsat, MB, Lemoine, NP and Savidge, JA (2018a) Spatial dynamics of habitat use informs reintroduction efforts in the presence of an invasive predator. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 17901798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, EM, Chojnacki, J, Rogers, HS and Savidge, JA (2018b) Differences among avian frugivores in seed dispersal to degraded habitats. Restoration Ecology 26, 760766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, EM, Fricke, E, Bender, J, Savidge, J and Rogers, HS (2019) Animal movement drives variation in seed dispersal distance in a plant-animal network. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 286, 20182007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichel, JD and Glass, PO (1990) Micronesian starling predation on seabird eggs. Emu 90, 135136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodda, GH, Fritts, TH and Conry, PJ (1992) Origin and population growth of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis, on Guam. Pacific Science 46, 4657.Google Scholar
Rogers, HS, Buhle, ER, HilleRisLambers, J, Fricke, EC, Miller, RH and Tewksbury, JJ (2017) Effects of an invasive predator cascade to plants via mutualism disruption. Nature Communications 8, 14557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, KV and Cooper, RJ (1990) Approaches to avian diet analysis. Studies in Avian Biology 13, 8090.Google Scholar
Saracco, JF, Collazo, JA and Groom, MJ (2004) How do frugivores track resources? Insights from spatial analyses of bird foraging in a tropical forest. Oecologia 139, 235245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savidge, JA (1987) Extinction of an island forest avifauna by an introduced snake. Ecology 68, 660668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schupp, EW (1992) The Janzen–Connell model for tropical tree diversity: population implications and the importance of spatial scale. American Naturalist 140, 526530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Şekercioğlu, CH (2006) Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 464471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Space, JC and Falanruw, M (1999) Observations on invasive plant species in Micronesia. MS prepared for meeting of Pacific Island Committee Council of Western States Foresters, Majuro, Marshall Islands.Google Scholar
Stratford, JA and Şekercioğlu, CH (2015) Birds in forest ecosystems. In Peh, KSH, Corlett, RT and Bergeron, Y (eds), Routledge Handbook of Forest Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 295310.Google Scholar
Traveset, A (1998) Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1, 151190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traveset, A, Robertson, AW and Rodríguez-Pérez, J (2007) A review on the role of endozoochory in seed germination. In Dennis, AJ, Green, RJ and Schupp, EW (eds), Seed Dispersal: Theory and Its Application in a Changing World. Wallingford: CABI, pp. 78103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandrag, EM, Dunham, AE, Duncan, RP and Rogers, HS (2017) Seed dispersal increases local species richness and reduces spatial turnover of tropical tree seedlings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114, 1068910694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheelwright, NT, Haber, WA, Murray, KG and Guindon, C (1984) Tropical fruit-eating birds and their food plants: a survey of a Costa Rican lower montane forest. Biotropica 16, 173192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, CJ, Wenny, DG and Marquis, RJ (2008) Ecosystem services provided by birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1134, 2560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiles, GJ and Johnson, NC (2004) Population size and natural history of Mariana fruit bats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) on Sarigan, Mariana Islands. Pacific Science 58, 585596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, GJ (2005) A checklist of the birds and mammals of Micronesia. Micronesica 38, 141189.Google Scholar
Wunderle, Jr, JM (1997) The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecology and Management 99, 223235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, T and Isagi, Y (2012) Dietary breadth of frugivorous birds in relation to their feeding strategies in the lowland forests of central Honshu, Japan. Oikos 121, 10411052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the southernmost islands of the Mariana archipelago where the study was conducted. Inset indicates the location of the Mariana Islands (M.I., delineated by the green rectangle) relative to the closest land masses, Japan and the Philippine Islands (P.I.).

Figure 1

Table 1. List of plant species consumed by Såli (Aplonis opaca) based on historical observations from throughout Micronesia (n = 19) and in this study (n = 37) based on behavioural observations, fecal samples and nest contents from three islands (Saipan – S, Guam – G, Rota – R) in the Mariana archipelago. Historical observations were compiled from the published literature and include the locality where the observation occurred and the reference in which observational data were presented. Plant species identified in this study from behavioural observations of Såli are indicated with a “+” under the island where observations occurred. Seeds identified from fecal samples on Saipan (n = 20 samples, 354 seeds) and Guam (n = 403 samples, 25 967 seeds) and nest contents on Guam only (n = 49 samples, 728 seeds) include the proportion of samples in which the given species was present

Figure 2

Figure 2. Frequency of occurrence of seeds of tree species found in fecal samples of Såli (Micronesian starling – Aplonis opaca) on Guam, USA in 2017 (n = 242 samples, blue bars) and 2018 (n = 161 samples, red bars). Inset is a linear regression of 2017 vs 2018 proportions, including a line with slope of 1 (indicating a 1:1 ratio of frequency of occurrence between years).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Frequency of occurrence of seeds of tree species found in fecal samples of adult/juvenile (n = 19) and nestling (n = 382) Såli (Micronesian starling – Aplonis opaca) on Guam, USA in 2017–2018. Inset is a linear regression of juvenile/adult vs nestling proportions, including a line with slope of 1 (indicating a 1:1 ratio of frequency of occurrence between age classes). One outlier species (Carica papaya) is indicated by the black arrow.

Supplementary material: File

Pollock et al. supplementary material

Pollock et al. supplementary material 1

Download Pollock et al. supplementary material(File)
File 117.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pollock et al. supplementary material

Pollock et al. supplementary material 2

Download Pollock et al. supplementary material(File)
File 128 KB