Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:59:32.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infertility and mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The World Health Organization (WHO) has indicated that 8–12% of couples worldwide experience infertility, and in recent years the number seeking treatment has dramatically increased. The diagnosis and therapy put a heavy psychological and physical burden on most patients, female and male. The incidence of depression in couples presenting for infertility treatment is significantly higher than in comparable fertile couples. Anxiety is significantly higher in infertile couples than in the general population. Professionals have become aware of the importance of providing educational interventions to address patients' fears and concerns, and to better prepare patients for the demands of treatment. Health professionals should follow a patient-centred approach to provide for the specific needs of the couple. Women in general have a positive attitude to seeking psychological help in the form of cognitive-behavioural therapy, couples counselling and infertility counselling.

Learning Objectives

  1. Learn about the incidence rates of infertility and its impact on the mental health of the couple.

  2. Know about infertility treatment and its psychological impact.

  3. Learn about the different management strategies that can be helpful in the treatment of mental illness associated with infertility.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2014 

Infertility is perceived as a problem across virtually all cultures and societies and it affects an estimated 10–15% of couples of reproductive age (Reference Boivin, Bunting and CollinsBoivin 2007). The World Health Organization (WHO) has indicated that 8–12% of couples worldwide experience infertility (Reference Hsu and KuoHsu 2002; World Health Organization 2014). Infertility primarily refers to the biological inability of a person to contribute to conception. It may also refer to the state of a woman who is unable to carry a pregnancy to full term (Reference Lash, Yaghamee and StrohsnitterLash 2008) or to the inability of a couple to achieve pregnancy after at least 1 year of trying to do so without using any means of birth control (Reference Cooper, Noonan and von EckardsteinCooper 2010).

In recent years, the number of couples seeking treatment for infertility has dramatically increased for several reasons. First, fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICIS) have become more successful, with long-term cumulative pregnancy rates nearing 70% (Reference Pinborg, Hougaard and NyboePinborg 2009). Second, couples are increasingly aware of available services. Third, the proportion of women who are intentionally delaying pregnancy beyond the age of 35 years has increased greatly in the past few decades. Women nowadays tend to start a family at a later age in favour of their educational and professional development. The consequences of advancing maternal and paternal age are relevant not only for the related risks to natural and assisted conception, but also for the outcome of pregnancy (Reference Balasch and GratacósBalasch 2012). Postponement of parenthood seems to be linked to a higher rate of involuntary childlessness and smaller than desired families, because of increased infertility and fetal death as female and male age progresses (Reference Schmidt, Sobotka and BentzenSchmidt 2012). It is important to consider the combined effect of higher female and male age on infertility and reproductive outcome in order to advise couples on the best time to start a family. Interestingly, in a recent European survey, many women were unaware of the relationship between age and fecundity, failed to understand when decline begins, or had the impression that their own health and youthful appearance were protective (Reference Domar, Gordon and Garcia-VelascoDomar 2012).

Increased participation in fertility treatment has raised awareness and inspired research about the psychological impact of infertility and infertility treatment. Consideration has been given to the association between psychiatric illness and infertility. Researchers have also looked into the psychological impact of infertility itself and of the prolonged exposure to intrusive infertility treatments on mood and well-being. It is beyond dispute that a diagnosis of infertility and therapy for infertility put a heavy psychological and physical burden on most patients (Reference Greil, Slauson-Blevins and McQuillanGreil 2010). Many authors believe that infertility and its treatment cause a life crisis for most couples (Reference MenningMenning 1980; Reference Dunkel-Schetter, Lobel, Stanton and Dunkel-SchetterDunkel-Schetter 1991; Reference LalosLalos 1999). Although research has shown that the majority of infertile patients show no long-term deficits in life satisfaction, the reduced satisfaction at the time of diagnosis and subsequent treatment does seem to cause difficulties for the couple (Reference Henning, Straub and StraubHenning 2002; Reference Verhaak, Smeenk and EversVerhaak 2007).

The aims of this article are to review the available literature on infertility and its association with mental health difficulties, the impact of treatments for infertility on mental health, and the recommended management strategies.

Psychological aspects of infertility: cause or effect?

Several variables have been identified as affecting or being associated with infertility. It has been highlighted over the years that one of the most difficult emotional consequences of infertility is the loss of control over one’s life, as infertility marginalises other important aspects of life (Reference Cousineau and DomarCousineau 2007). This might in part be explained by the fact that, during childhood and adolescence, social messages about the importance of parenthood are constantly disseminated, especially in reference to women, showing ‘being a mother’ as a central role to identity. Therefore, infertile women often experience a sense of loss of identity and feelings of defectiveness and incompetence (Reference Deka and SarmaDeka 2010).

Anxiety and depression

Stress, depression and anxiety are common consequences of infertility. A number of studies have found that the incidence of depression in infertile couples presenting for infertility treatment is significantly higher than in fertile controls, with prevalence estimates of major depression in the range of 15–54% (Reference Downey, Yingling and McKinneyDowney 1989; Reference Fassino, Piero and BoggioFassino 2002; Reference Chen, Chang and TsaiChen 2004). It is important to evaluate women at the beginning of their infertility diagnosis and treatment, as most studies have shown that the presence of depressive symptoms is associated with longer duration of treatment (Reference Thiering, Beaurepaire and JonesThiering 1993; Reference Kee, Jung and LeeKee 2000; Reference Smeenk, Verhaak and EugsterSmeenk 2001; Reference Lok, Cheung and ChungLok 2002).

Anxiety has also been shown to be significantly higher in infertile couples than in the general population: 8–28% of infertile couples report clinically significant anxiety, and generalised anxiety disorder is the most common anxiety disorder diagnosed (Reference Anderson, Sharpe and RattrayAnderson 2003; Reference Chen, Chang and TsaiChen 2004).

The causal role of psychological disturbances in the development of infertility is still a matter of debate. A study by Reference Lapane, Zierler and LasaterLapane and colleagues (1995) involving 58 women of child-bearing age reported a twofold increase in risk of infertility among those with a history of depressive symptoms. However, it did not control for other factors that might influence fertility, such as cigarette smoking, alcohol use, decreased libido and body mass index.

Proposed mechanisms through which depression could directly affect infertility involve the physiology of the depressed state, such as elevated prolactin levels, disruption of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and thyroid dysfunction (Box 1). A study of 10 depressed and 13 non-depressed women suggested that depression is associated with abnormal regulation of luteinising hormone, a hormone that regulates ovulation (Reference Meller, Zander and CrosbyMeller 1997). Changes in immune function associated with stress and depression may also adversely affect reproductive function (Reference Haimovici, Takahashi and AndersonHaimovici 1992).

BOX 1 Causal physiological pathways associated with depression and infertility

  1. Hyperprolactinaemia

  2. Disruption of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis

  3. Hypo- or hyperthyroidism

  4. Abnormalities in the luteinising hormone regulation

It is clear that further studies are needed to distinguish the direct effects of depression or anxiety from associated symptoms and/or behaviours (e.g. low libido, smoking, alcohol use) that may interfere with reproductive success. An interesting paper by Reference Moura-Ramos, Gameiro and CanavarroMoura-Ramos and colleagues (2012) has recently highlighted that stress-related indirect factors such as socioeconomic status and place of residence may have an impact on emotional distress (defined as tension, nervousness or worry not fulfilling criteria for a diagnosis of depression or anxiety disorder). The authors noted that contextual factors indirectly affect emotional distress by shaping the way the infertility is experienced by men and women. They also found that the indirect effects, although found in both men and women, are less predictive of men’s emotional distress than of women’s.

Since emotional distress is also associated with physiological changes, this raises the possibility that a history of high levels of cumulative stress associated with recurrent depression or anxiety may also be causative factors in infertility (Reference Deka and SarmaDeka 2010). Supporting this view is the Harvard Study of Moods and Cycles by Reference Harlow, Wise and OttoHarlow and colleagues (2003). This showed that a lifetime history of depression may be associated with early decline of ovarian function.

Fertility in women with a diagnosis of affective illness or schizophrenia has also been suggested to be reduced (Reference JonssonJonsson 1991). A study involving women and men with bipolar illness found that fertility was reduced in both genders even before onset of the illness. After illness onset, the overall reduction remained the same in women, but increased further in men (Reference Baron, Risch and MendlewiczBaron 1982). Reference Calzeroni, Conte and PennatiCalzeroni et al (1990) studied fertility rates in women with a diagnosis of major depression with psychotic features and women with suicidal behaviours. They concluded that those who had attempted suicide had significantly fewer children than those who had not. There were no significant differences in rates of childlessness between the women with and without delusions, but women without psychotic features had higher levels of infertility (Reference Calzeroni, Conte and PennatiCalzeroni 1990).

Psychotropic medication

Several psychotropic medications may affect infertility, but the literature in this area is very limited. For example, the effect of antidepressants on fertility has not been fully investigated and the literature regarding their use in pregnancy and rates of spontaneous abortions is conflicting (Reference GentileGentile 2008; Reference Kjaersgaard, Parner and VestergaardKjaersgaard 2013). However, a meta-analysis found that exposure to antidepressants was associated with a significant increase in spontaneous abortion rates (Reference Hemels, Einarson and KorenHemels 2005). Another study reviewed the outcome of IVF treatment in women taking antidepressants. The authors found that 40% of women taking antidepressants had ongoing pregnancies compared with 51% not taking antidepressants (Reference KlockKlock 2004).

There are no studies of the influence of mood stabilisers on fertility rates. It has been suggested that valproic acid may reduce fertility through its effect on hyperandrogenism, hyperinsulinaemia and dyslipidaemia and menstrual abnormalities (Reference Morrell, Isojarvi and TaylorMorrel 2003; Reference RasgonRasgon 2004).

Atypical antipsychotics (in particular risperidone) have been associated with increased prolactin levels even at low doses, and thereby independently influence fertility (Reference Haddad and WieckHaddad 2004). Only a few studies have looked at the effects of antipsychotic medication on pregnancy outcome and spontaneous abortions and they found no association between the two variables (Reference McKenna, Koren and TetelbaumMcKenna 2005; Reference Coppola, Russo and KwartaCoppola 2007; Reference Habermann, Fritzsche and FuhlbrückHabermann 2013).

Treatment for infertility and its emotional impact

Many women have reported finding treatment for infertility stressful and a cause of relationship difficulties with their partners (Reference Carter, Applegarth and JosephsCarter 2011). By contrast, however, a European survey concluded that, despite reporting increased stress in certain areas of their relationships with partners, family and friends, women in treatment felt that they received more support from friends and family and felt closer to their partners than women who were not in treatment (Reference Domar, Gordon and Garcia-VelascoDomar 2012). This survey also indicated that women undergoing treatment were more likely to feel hopeful and less concerned about many aspects of the therapy. However, fear of failure was the most important barrier to treatment. Anxiety regarding the daily injection schedule was the second most worrying aspect, owing to the constraints on work, family and social lives. This finding is also consistent with the previous literature (Reference Brod, Hoomans and WiebingaBrod 2007, Reference Brod, Verhaak and Wiebinga2009).

A number of research studies have examined the impact of infertility treatment on mood at different stages, with most focusing on the impact of failed IVF. Reference Hynes, Callan and TerryHynes and colleagues (1992) assessed women at presentation for IVF and then following treatment failure. They found that women presenting for infertility treatments were more depressed, had lower self-esteem and were less confident than a control group of fertile women and, after a failed IVF cycle, experienced a further lowering of self-esteem and an increase in depression relative to pre-treatment levels. By contrast, a subsequent systematic review indicated that women starting IVF were only slightly different emotionally from the general population (Reference Verhaak, Smeenk and EversVerhaak 2007). Unsuccessful treatment raised the women’s levels of negative emotions, which continued after consecutive unsuccessful cycles. In general, most women proved to adjust well to unsuccessful IVF, although a considerable number showed subclinical emotional problems. When IVF resulted in pregnancy, the negative emotions disappeared, indicating that treatment-induced stress is considerably related to the threat of failure. Therefore, we could infer from the studies comparing women undergoing repeated IVF cycles with first-time participants that repeated treatment may lead to an increase in depressive symptoms.

Effects of infertility medication

The psychological impact of infertility medication (in particular clomifene citrate) may be an important independent risk factor for the development of depression, as it dramatically alters serum levels of oestrogen and progesterone (Reference Choi, Shapiro and RobinsonChoi 2005). However, only a few studies and case reports have investigated this matter. Clomifene has been associated with increased irritability, emotionality and exacerbated symptoms of premenstrual syndrome (Reference BlennerBlenner 1991), and with increased fatigue at mid-cycle, a time when estradiol levels are highest (Reference Williams, Marsh and RasgonWilliams 2007).

Influence of psychological state on treatment outcome

The outcome of infertility treatment may also be influenced by psychological factors. A number of studies have examined stress and mood states as predictors of outcome in assisted reproduction. The majority of these support the theory that emotional distress (as defined above, tension, nervousness or worry not fulfilling criteria for a diagnosis of depression or anxiety disorder) is associated with lower pregnancy rates among women pursuing infertility treatment (Reference Sanders and BruceSanders 1999; Reference Smeenk, Verhaak and EugsterSmeenk 2001).

Very few studies have considered women who meet full criteria for a mood disorder. One reported that women with major depression had lower rates of pregnancy following IVF than non-depressed women (Reference Thiering, Beaurepaire and JonesThiering 1993). Two further studies, which controlled for several confounders (age, number of previous pregnancies and number of embryos transferred), both noted that depression had an independent and significant correlation with lower pregnancy rates (Reference Demyttenaere, Bonte and GhedolfDemyttenaere 1998; Reference Smeenk, Verhaak and EugsterSmeenk 2001). State anxiety and a depressive coping style were strongly associated with lower pregnancy rates compared with controls. These findings contrast with those of other studies that found minimal psychological disturbance induced by the infertility treatment process or IVF failure, but in general these studies did not control for confounding variables such as age, duration of treatment or embryo status (Reference Boivin and TakefmanBoivin 1996, Reference Boivin, Bunting and Collins2011a; Reference Paulson, Haarmann and SalermoPaulson 1988). A meta-analysis concluded that emotional distress caused by infertility does not compromise the chance of becoming pregnant (Reference Boivin, Griffiths and VenetisBoivin 2011b), highlighting again the fact that there is a complex relationship between stress and IVF outcome.

Drop-out from infertility treatment

There has been an increasing interest in studying the factors that contribute to drop-out from infertility treatment, since those who do not complete treatment are often not included or decline to participate in studies. Research suggests that a significant proportion of those who drop out of treatment do so because of psychological factors such as emotional distress. A number of studies have reported that among women receiving treatment for infertility, psychological stress is consistently reported as the most frequent reason for early discontinuation (Reference Olivius, Friden and BorgOlivius 2004; Reference Brandes, van der Steen and BokdamBrandes 2009; Reference Van den Broeck, Holvoet and EnzlinVan den Broeck 2009). Other reasons are financial burden, a negative effect on social contacts and the perception that staff lack expertise (Reference Van den Broeck, Holvoet and EnzlinVan den Broeck 2009).

Psychological management

Fertility experts are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of providing educational interventions to address patients’ fears and concerns and to better prepare patients for the demands of treatment. Improving the quality of information provided to patients is one of the easiest ways to improve patient experiences (Reference Bunge, Muhlhauser and SteckelbergBunge 2010; Reference Dancet, Nelen and SermeusDancet 2010). Box 2 shows a stepwise approach to delivering infertility-oriented psychological help that can be used by mental health professionals and other physicians.

BOX 2 Approach to infertility counselling

  1. 1 Information gathering and analysis: patient-centred care

  2. 2 Implications and decision-making counselling: patient-centred care and infertility counselling

  3. 3 Supportive counselling: infertility counselling

  4. 4 Crisis counselling: psychotherapy

  5. 5 Therapeutic counselling: psychotherapy

(Reference Peterson, Boivin and NorrePeterson 2012)

Current recommendations suggest that staff should try to adopt a patient-centred approach to infertility counselling, providing sufficient information about the pros and cons of medical treatments to enable patients to make an informed decision (Reference Peterson, Boivin and NorrePeterson 2012). The Institute of Medicine in the USA has defined patient-centred healthcare delivery as that which ‘provides care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs and values and ensures that patient values guide all clinical decisions’ (Institute of Medicine 2001). Risk factors for high distress should be also assessed. These include:

  1. personal factors: pre-existing psychopathology, primary infertility, being a woman, viewing parenting as a central goal in life, an avoidant coping style

  2. social factors: poor marital relationship, impoverished social network, frequent reminders of infertility

  3. treatment-linked factors: side-effects of medication, miscarriage, prior treatment failure.

Several measures have been developed to help staff identify patients who should be referred for psychological support, including SCREENIVF (Reference Verhaak, Lintsen and EversVerhaak 2010), FertiQoL (Reference Boivin, Takefman and BravermanBoivin 2011a) and FertiSTAT (Reference Bunting and BoivinBunting 2010) (Box 3).

BOX 3 Rating scales to assess psychological infertility distress

  1. SCREENIVF: highly predictive of pre-treatment distress

  2. FertiQoL: assesses impact of fertility problems and treatment on personal, social and relational life domains

  3. FertiSTAT: helps women and their partners learn about their fertility and engage in behavioural change that could optimise it

Evidence for psychological treatments

Nearly all studies report that women experience greater amounts of infertility-related stress than men (Reference Greil, Slauson-Blevins and McQuillanGreil 2010). Men do experience stress, but seem to be less emotionally affected. Women in general have a more positive attitude to seeking psychological help and therapy. In a 12-month follow-up study, Domar and colleagues compared pregnancy rates of women undergoing assisted reproduction who were randomly allocated to a group cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) designed to decrease depression and anxiety, to a support group, or to routine care. Viable pregnancy rates were 55% for the CBT group, 54% for the support group and 20% for the control group (Reference Domar, Clapp and SlawsbyDomar 2000a). The group CBT and the support group participants experienced significant psychological improvement at 6 and 12 months compared with the control participants, with the CBT participants showing the greatest positive change (Reference Domar, Clapp and SlawsbyDomar 2000b).

A study in which the intervention group received couples counselling focused on education and addressing stress throughout the IVF cycle and the control group received only routine medical care showed that the intervention group had lower anxiety and depression scores, in addition to significantly higher pregnancy rates (Reference TerziogluTerzioglu 2001).

Pilot studies have also shown decreased levels of hopelessness and low mood and increased psychosocial well-being in women using group spiritual interventions and group art therapy classes (Reference Chan, Chan and NgChan 2012; Reference Hughes and da SilvaHughes 2011).

Conversely, a meta-analysis of psychological interventions found no significant effects on mental health outcomes but a positive effect on pregnancy rates (Reference Hammerli, Znoj and BarthHammerli 2009).

Most clinicians offering infertility treatment try to create a culture of patient-centred care to achieve optimal success. Sometimes, the psychological needs of patients can only be met by more in-depth psychosocial interventions that are best delivered by mental health professionals or infertility counsellors. In addition, although data are sparse regarding the pharmacological treatment of patients experiencing infertility, pharmacotherapy remains an important option for women and men who develop depression in the context of infertility and its treatment. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of CBT and fluoxetine on depression in infertile women showed that CBT was superior or at least as effective as pharmacotherapy in promoting well-being (improvement on measures of social, sexual and marital concerns; acceptance of a child-free lifestyle and rejection of the need for parenthood; and overall reduced stress about infertility) (Reference Faramarzi, Kheirkhan and EsmaelzadehFaramarzi 2008).

Conclusions

The relationship between mood disorders and fertility is very complex and a biopsychosocial approach towards diagnosis and management is necessary. Mood disorders may be associated with reduced fertility rates, but the causality is still unclear and probably variable, depending on independent factors, such as the infertility subtype affecting the woman, that need further investigation (Reference Williams, Marsh and RasgonWilliams 2007).

Further research is necessary to fully understand infertility, its impact on mood and how best manage it. Future studies should try to clarify whether treatment for infertility in itself affects mood, and also if that effect is more pronounced in women with a history of previous mental illness than in those without.

MCQs

Select the single best option for each question stem

  1. 1 According to the World Health Organization, the prevalence of infertility worldwide is:

    1. a 20%

    2. b 50%

    3. c 8–12%

    4. d 5–10%

    5. e 6%.

  2. 2 Psychological distress related to infertility pre-treatment is best assessed by the:

    1. a BDI

    2. b FertiQoL

    3. c FertiSTAT

    4. d CTQ

    5. e SCREENIVF

  3. 3 Our review of psychotherapies for psychological distress associated with infertility found no evidence base for:

    1. a cognitive–behavioural therapy

    2. b psychoeducation

    3. c couples counselling

    4. d supportive psychotherapy

    5. e dialectical behaviour therapy.

  4. 4 The incidence of depression in infertile couples is estimated to be:

    1. a 2%

    2. b 15–54%

    3. c 0.5%

    4. d 40–50%

    5. e 10%.

  5. 5 The rate of clinically significant anxiety in infertile couples is estimated to be:

    1. a 1%

    2. b 5%

    3. c 8–28%

    4. d 40%

    5. e 60%.

MCQ answers

1 c 2 e 3 e 4 b 5 c

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest

None.

References

Anderson, KM, Sharpe, M, Rattray, A et al (2003) Distress and concerns in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54: 353–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasch, J, Gratacós, E (2012) Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 24: 187–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, M, Risch, N, Mendlewicz, J (1982) Differential fertility in bipolar affective illness. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2: 103–12.Google Scholar
Blenner, JL (1991) Clomiphene-induced mood swings. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 20: 321–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, J, Takefman, J (1996) Impact of the in-vitro fertilization process on emotional, physical and relational variables. Human Reproduction, 11: 903–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, J, Bunting, L, Collins, JA et al (2007) International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human Reproduction, 22: 1506–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, J, Takefman, J, Braverman, A (2011a) Development and preliminary validation of the fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool. Human Reproduction, 26: 2084–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, J, Griffiths, E, Venetis, CA (2011b) Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ, 342: d223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandes, M, van der Steen, JO, Bokdam, SB et al (2009) When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Human Reproduction, 24: 3127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brod, M, Hoomans, EHM, Wiebinga, CJ (2007) Understanding the impact of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on women's functioning and well-being. Human Reproduction, 22: i2236.Google Scholar
Brod, M, Verhaak, CM, Wiebinga, CJ et al (2009) Improving clinical understanding of the effect of ovarian stimulation on women's lives. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 18: 391400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunge, M, Muhlhauser, I, Steckelberg, A (2010) What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Education and Counseling, 78: 316–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunting, L, Boivin, J (2010) Development and preliminary validation of the Fertility Status Awareness Toll: FertiSTAT. Human Reproduction, 25: 1722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calzeroni, A, Conte, G, Pennati, A et al (1990) Celibacy and fertility rates in patients with major affective disorders: the relevance of delusional symptoms and suicidal behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 82: 309–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, J, Applegarth, L, Josephs, L et al (2011) A cross-sectional cohort of infertile women awaiting oocyte donation: the emotional, sexual and quality-of-life impact. Fertility and Sterility, 95: 711–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, CH, Chan, CL, Ng, EH et al (2012) Incorporating spirituality in psychosocial group intervention for women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized controlled study. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 85: 356–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, TH, Chang, SP, Tsai, CF et al (2004) Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic. Human Reproduction, 19: 2313–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, SH, Shapiro, H, Robinson, GE et al (2005) Psychological side effects of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadropins. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 26: 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, TG, Noonan, E, von Eckardstein, S (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human Reproduction Update, 16: 231–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Coppola, D, Russo, LJ, Kwarta, RF Jr et al (2007) Evaluating the postmarketing experience of risperidone use during pregnancy: pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Drug Safety, 30: 247–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cousineau, TM, Domar, AD (2007) Psychological impact of infertility. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2: 293308.Google Scholar
Dancet, EA, Nelen, WL, Sermeus, W et al (2010) The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 16: 467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deka, PK, Sarma, S (2010) Psychological aspects of infertility. British Journal of Medical Practitioners, 3: a336.Google Scholar
Demyttenaere, K, Bonte, L, Ghedolf, M et al (1998) Coping style and depression level influence outcome in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 69: 1026–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domar, AD, Clapp, D, Slawsby, EA et al (2000a) Impact of group psychological interventions on pregnancy rates in infertile women. Fertility and Sterility, 73: 805–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domar, AD, Clapp, D, Slawsby, E et al (2000b) The impact of group psychological interventions on distress in infertile women. Health Psychology, 19: 568–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domar, A, Gordon, K, Garcia-Velasco, J et al (2012) Understanding the perceptions of emotional barriers to infertility treatment: a survey in four European countries. Human Reproduction, 27: 1073–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downey, J, Yingling, S, McKinney, M et al (1989) Mood disorders, psychiatric symptoms, and distress in women presenting for infertility evaluation. Fertility and Sterility, 52: 425–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunkel-Schetter, C, Lobel, M (1991) Psychological reaction to infertility. In Infertility. Perspectives from Stress and Coping Research (eds Stanton, A, Dunkel-Schetter, C) 2957. Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faramarzi, M, Kheirkhan, F, Esmaelzadeh, S et al (2008) Is psychotherapy a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy to promote the mental health of infertile women? A randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 141: 4953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fassino, S, Piero, A, Boggio, S et al (2002) Anxiety, depression and anger suppression in infertile couples: a controlled study. Human Reproduction, 17: 2986–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentile, S (2008) Pregnancy exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of spontaneous abortions. CNS Spectrums, 13: 960–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greil, AI, Slauson-Blevins, K, McQuillan, J (2010) The experience of infertility: a review of the recent literature. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32: 140–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habermann, F, Fritzsche, J, Fuhlbrück, F et al (2013) Atypical antipsychotic drugs and pregnancy outcome: a prospective, cohort study. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 33: 453–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, PM, Wieck, A (2004) Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia: mechanisms, clinical features and management. Drugs, 64: 2291–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haimovici, F, Takahashi, K, Anderson, DJ (1992) Antifertility effects of antisperm cell-mediated immunity in mice. Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 22: 281–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammerli, K, Znoj, H, Barth, J (2009) The efficacy of psychological interventions for infertile patients: a meta-analysis examining mental health and pregnancy rates. Human Reproduction Update, 15: 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, BL, Wise, LA, Otto, MW et al (2003) Depression and its influence on reproductive endocrine and menstrual cycle markers associated with perimenopause: the Harvard Study of Moods and Cycles. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60: 2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemels, ME, Einarson, A, Koren, G et al (2005) Antidepressant use during pregnancy and the rates of spontaneous abortions: a meta-analysis. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 39: 803–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henning, K, Straub, B (2002) Psychological and psychosomatic aspects of involuntary childlessness: state of research at the end of the 1990s. In Involuntary Childlessness. Psychological Assessment, Counselling and Psychotherapy (ed Straub, B) 119. Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
Hsu, YL, Kuo, B J (2002) Evaluations of emotional reactions and coping behaviors as well as correlated factors for infertile couples receiving assisted reproductive technologies. Journal of Nursing Research, 10: 291301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, EG, da Silva, AM (2011) A pilot study assessing art therapy as a mental health intervention for subfertile women. Human Reproduction, 26: 611–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hynes, GJ, Callan, VJ, Terry, DJ et al (1992) The psychological well-being of infertile women after a failed IVF attempt: the effects of coping. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 65: 269–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Jonsson, SA (1991) Marriage rate and fertility in cycloid psychosis: comparison with affective disorder, schizophrenia and the general population. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 241: 119–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjaersgaard, MIS, Parner, ET, Vestergaard, M et al (2013) Prenatal antidepressant exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion – a population-based study. PLoS ONE, 8 (8): e72095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kee, BS, Jung, BJ, Lee, SH (2000) A study on psychological strain in IVF patients. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 17: 445–8.Google Scholar
Klock, SC (2004) A pilot study of the relationship between serotonin reuptake inhibitors and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertility and Sterility, 82: 968–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalos, A (1999) Breaking bad news concerning infertility. Human Reproduction, 14: 581–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapane, KL, Zierler, S, Lasater, TM et al (1995) Is a history of depressive symptoms associated with an increased risk of infertility in women? Psychosomatic Medicine, 57: 509–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lash, MM, Yaghamee, A, Strohsnitter, W et al (2008) Association between secondary infertility and fallopian tube obstruction on hysterosalpingography Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 5: 677–80.Google Scholar
Lok, IH, Cheung, LP, Chung, WS et al (2002) Psychiatric morbidity amongst infertile Chinese women undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology and the impact of treatment failure. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 53: 195–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, K, Koren, G, Tetelbaum, M et al (2005) Pregnancy outcome of women using atypical antipsychotic drugs: a prospective comparative study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66: 444–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Meller, WH, Zander, KM, Crosby, RD et al (1997) Luteinizing hormone pulse characteristics in depressed women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154: 1454–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Menning, BE (1980) The emotional needs of infertile couples. Fertility and Sterility, 34: 313–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Morrell, MJ, Isojarvi, J, Taylor, AE et al (2003) Higher androgens and weight gain with valproate compared with lamotrigine for epilepsy. Epilepsy Research, 5: 189–99.Google Scholar
Moura-Ramos, M, Gameiro, S, Canavarro, MC et al (2012) The indirect effect of contextual factors on the emotional distress of infertile couples. Psychology and Health, 27: 533–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivius, C, Friden, B, Borg, G et al (2004) Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study. Fertility and Sterility, 81: 258–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Paulson, JD, Haarmann, BS, Salermo, RL et al (1988) An investigation of the relationship between emotional maladjustment and infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 49: 258–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, B, Boivin, J, Norre, J et al (2012) An introduction to infertility counseling: a guide for mental health and medical professionals. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29: 243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinborg, A, Hougaard, CO, Nyboe, AA et al (2009) Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment. Human Reproduction, 24: 991–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Rasgon, N (2004) The relationship between polysytic ovary syndrome and anti-epileptic drugs: a review of the evidence. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24: 322–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, KA, Bruce, NW (1999) Psychosocial stress and treatment outcome following assisted reproductive technology. Human Reproduction, 14: 1656–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, L, Sobotka, T, Bentzen, JG et al (2012) Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Human Reproduction Update, 18: 2943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smeenk, JM, Verhaak, CM, Eugster, A et al (2001) The effect of anxiety and depression on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 16: 1420–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terzioglu, F (2001) Investigation into effectiveness of counselling on assisted reproductive techniques in Turkey. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 22, 133–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiering, P, Beaurepaire, J, Jones, M et al (1993) Mood state as a predictor of treatment outcome after in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer technology (IVF/ET). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37: 481–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Broeck, U, Holvoet, L, Enzlin, P et al (2009) Reasons for dropout in infertility treatment. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 68: 5864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaak, CM, Smeenk, JMJ, Evers, AWM et al (2007) Women's emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Human Reproduction Update, 13: 2736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaak, CM, Lintsen, AME, Evers, AWM et al (2010) Who is at risk of emotional problems and how do you know? Screening of women going for IVF treatment. Human Reproduction, 25: 1234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, KE, Marsh, WK, Rasgon, NL (2007) Mood disorders and fertility in women: a critical review of the literature and implications for further research. Human Reproduction Update, 13: 607–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2014) Global prevalence of infertility, infecundity and childlessness. WHO (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/burden/en).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.