Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:51:58.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

We must not fail the children of Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2007

Agneta Yngve*
Affiliation:
Editor-in-Chief
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2007

In the closing statement of a magnificent plenary lecture at the Durban International Congress of Nutrition in 2005, Professor Alan A Jackson stated with great emphasis what we all know as a chilling truth: We have failed the children of Africa!

And we have. Under five mortality rates in Western and Central Africa are the highest in the world, according to UNICEF1. In this region, one out five children do not live to see their fifth birthday. Problems are also huge in Eastern and Southern Africa.

Two reviews on child development from the International Child Development Steering Group (ICDSG) have been published this year in the Lancet Reference Walker, Wachs, Gardner, Lozoff, Wasserman and Pollitt2, Reference Grantham-McGregor, Cheung, Cueto, Glewwe, Richter and Strupp3. According to ICDSG, the magnitude of the problem is immense: about 200 million children under 5 years of age are unable to reach their potential in cognitive and psychosocial development. Failing to reach this developmental potential is likely to perpetuate the vicious circles of poverty and low education. The ICDSG points out the following four causes: malnutrition (stunting), deficiency of iron, deficiency of iodine, and lack of stimulation in infancy.

The ICDSGReference Walker, Wachs, Gardner, Lozoff, Wasserman and Pollitt2 reveals the following prevalences among children in developing countries during the first five years of life: stunting 31%, mild-to-severe iodine deficiency 35%, iron-deficiency anaemia 23–33%.

Poverty, armed conflict, crop failure, climate change, displacement and inequity within and between countries obviously do not help. We look forward to the third ICDSG review, pointing out possible strategies for the future. In previous years, the Bellagio Study Group on Child Survival published several ground-breaking papers on child survival and nutrition transitionReference Popkin5, Reference Popkin, Lu and Zhai6, valuable material for all nutrition educators and policy planners. A follow-up meeting is planned for this year.

Measles: good news

The extensive efforts to fight measles are paying off, showing a reduction in measles by 75% in AfricaReference Wolfson, Strebel, Gacic-Dobo, Hoekstra, McFarland and Hersh7. The death toll in Africa due to measles has decreased from roughly 506 000 in 1999 to 126 000 in 2005.

The massive campaign8 included two vaccinations per child, vitamin A supplementation and an integrated general child health campaign including nets for malaria protection, polio vaccines and regular check-ups of the child. It is important to remember that the magnificent results of the campaign certainly stem from the whole campaign rather than the immunisation on its own.

Previous studies indicate that more than half of all deaths from infectious diseases have underlying malnutrition and undernutrition as a contributing factorReference Claeson, Gillespie, Mshinda, Troedsson and Victora4, Reference Pelletier and Frongillo9, Reference Caulfield, de Onis, Blossner and Black10. This is not a competition between vaccination efforts and nutrition interventions; obviously the two are both important for increasing childhood survival. The encouraging results do point to the huge possibilities for achieving an impact when sufficient resources are available and when organisations join forces, as in this case WHO, UNICEF, CDC, the American Red Cross and the United Nations Foundation.

Poverty, education, gender: much to do

A recent paperReference Darnton-Hill, Kennedy, Cogill and Hossain11 points out the role of education of girls and women as extremely important in improving the health as well as nutritional status of children. Coming back to the first theme in this Editorial – we need to remember the implications of undernutrition on cognitive development for the most vulnerable groups and consider how to best support women within the most vulnerable groups as gatekeepers for healthy nutrition. Capacity-building on several levels is needed, accompanied by other efforts.

African universities need to lead the developmentReference Wahlqvist12, Reference Wade13, and the number of African universities is increasing steadily, including those who provide high-level nutrition training. The First Meeting of the African Nutrition Societies is taking place in Morocco in May 200714, hopefully another important step in collaboration and networking over the African continent.

As for the rest of us, not active in Africa, we all need to gather our forces. Strong support should be provided to African universities in their capacity-building efforts, in harmony with the efforts of WHO, UNICEF, the World Food Programme and other international bodies. Running around trying to do things in splendid isolation does not result in progress. African children urgently need our commitment in joint efforts. It is up to all of us to make sure that the development of child health in Africa is reported as dramatically improved at the next International Congress of Nutrition in 2009. In Rome 1992, political leaders from 159 countries and the European Union pledged15 to eliminate famine, starvation and micronutrient deficiencies such as vitamin A and iodine before the end of the decade, and further to substantially reduce starvation, hunger and other micronutrient deficiencies. The world does not need any more broken promises.

References

2Walker, SP, Wachs, TD, Gardner, JM, Lozoff, B, Wasserman, GA, Pollitt, E, et al. . Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet 2007; 369: 145–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Grantham-McGregor, S, Cheung, YB, Cueto, S, Glewwe, P, Richter, L, Strupp, B. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 2007; 369: 6070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Claeson, M, Gillespie, D, Mshinda, H, Troedsson, H, Victora, CG. Knowledge into action for child survival. Lancet 2003; 362: 323–7.Google ScholarPubMed
5Popkin, BM. The shift in stages of the nutrition transition in the developing world differs from past experiences! Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 205–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Popkin, BM, Lu, B, Zhai, F. Understanding the nutrition transition: measuring rapid dietary changes in transitional countries. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 947–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Wolfson, LJ, Strebel, PM, Gacic-Dobo, M, Hoekstra, EJ, McFarland, JW, Hersh, BS. Has the 2005 measles mortality reduction goal been achieved? A natural history modelling study. Lancet 2007; 369: 191200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Pelletier, DL, Frongillo, EA. Changes in child survival are strongly associated with changes in malnutrition in developing countries. Journal of Nutrition 2003; 133: 107–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Caulfield, LE, de Onis, M, Blossner, M, Black, RE. Undernutrition as an underlying cause of child deaths associated with diarrhea, pneumonia, malaria, and measles. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004; 80: 193–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Darnton-Hill, I, Kennedy, E, Cogill, B, Hossain, SM. Solutions to nutrition-related health problems of preschool children: education and nutritional policies for children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2006; 43(Suppl. 3): S54S65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Wahlqvist, ML. Towards a new generation of international nutrition science and scientist: the importance of Africa and its capacity. Journal of Nutrition 2006; 136: 1048–9 discussion 1050–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Wade, S. The importance of high-level training for nutrition scientists in Sub-Saharan Africa. Forum of Nutrition 2003; 56: 136–8.Google ScholarPubMed
15FAO/WHO. International Conference on Nutrition, World Declaration and Plan of Action. Rome/Geneva: FAO/WHO, 1992.Google Scholar