Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-hfbn9 Total loading time: 0.175 Render date: 2021-06-14T19:33:24.801Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

China–Cellulose Pulp: China's Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2019

KARA REYNOLDS
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at American University
TATIANA YANGUAS
Affiliation:
Advisory Centre on WTO Law
Corresponding

Abstract

In April 2017, a WTO panel ruled that China's anti-dumping investigation into imports of dissolving cellulose pulp from Canada violated the WTO's Anti-dumping Agreement. The panel found that China's description of the parallel price trends of dumped imports and domestic products failed to explain their finding that the dumped imports caused the decline in domestic prices. The ruling perhaps should not have surprised anyone as the WTO had made similar findings in disputes involving two previous Chinese anti-dumping investigations. This paper explores to what degree ‘parallel price trends’ can be used as a valid methodology to determine price depression, and whether it is the methodology itself that is problematic or China's implementation of that methodology that has caused it to lose three disputes over the past five years.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Kara Reynolds And Tatiana Yanguas 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

The views expressed in this article are the personal academic views of the authors. All errors remain ours alone.

References

Bown, C. P. (2005), ‘Trade Remedies and World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement: Why Are So Few Challenged?’, Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2): 515555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durling, J. P. (2008), ‘Article 3 ADA: Determination of Injury’, in Wolfrum, R., Still, P., and Koebel, M. (eds.), Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law: WTO – Trade Remedies, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, pp. 4774.Google Scholar
Feinberg, R. M. and Reynolds, K. M. (2018), ‘How Do Countries Respond to Anti-Dumping Filings? Dispute Settlement and Retaliatory Anti-Dumping’, The World Economy, 41(5): 12511268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, H. (2012), ‘Judicial Review of Trade Remedy Determinations in China: An Untested Theoretical Possibility?’, Chinese Journal of International Law, 11(1): 165190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugler, K. (2017), ‘China–Anti-dumping Measures on Imports of Cellulose Pulp from Canada (China–Cellulose Pulp), DS483’, World Trade Review, 16(4): 750752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, S. (1986), ‘A Sample Size Formula for Multiple Regression Studies’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(1): 112118.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. D. and Prusa, T. J. (2016), ‘China–Autos: Haven't We Danced this Dance Before?’, World Trade Review, 15(2): 303325.Google Scholar
Prusa, T. J. and Vermulst, E. (2014), ‘China–Countervailing and Anti-dumping Duties on Grain Oriented Flat-rolled Electrical Steel from the United States: Exporting US AD/CVD Methodologies through WTO Dispute Settlement?’, World Trade Review, 13(2): 229266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, J. (2007), ‘Trade, Investment and Beyond: The Impact of WTO Accession on China's Legal System’, The China Quarterly, 191: 720741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, J. and Vandenbussche, H. (2017), ‘China–GOES (Article 21.5): Time to Clarify the Standard for Price Suppression and Price Depression in AD/CVD Investigations’, World Trade Review, 16(2): 203226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G. and Gao, H. (2017), ‘China's Rise: How It Took on the US at the WTO’, Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2017-15, School of Law, University of California, Irvine, pp. 115184.Google Scholar
Stone, M. (2013), ‘China's Anti-Dumping Investigations against Cellulose Pulp’, www.paperadvance.com/blogs/Michael-stone/2409-chinas-anti-dumping (accessed 21 February 2018).Google Scholar
WTO Trade Policy Review Body (2016), ‘Trade Policy Review of China’, 15 June 2016, WT/TPR/S/342.Google Scholar
Wu, M. (2016), ‘The China, Inc. Challenge to Global Trade Governance’, Harvard International Law Journal, 57: 261.Google Scholar
Young, R. (2013), ‘No Signs of This Market Dissolving’, Pulp and Paper International, 55(3): 1720.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. and Abrami, R. (2011), ‘The New Face of Chinese Industrial Policy: Making Sense of Antidumping Cases in the Petrochemical and Steel Industries’, Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(3): 373406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

China–Cellulose Pulp: China's Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

China–Cellulose Pulp: China's Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

China–Cellulose Pulp: China's Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *