Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:33:20.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent developments in European and international welfare regulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

H.J. Blokhuis
H.J. Blokhuis
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB, Lelystad, The Netherlands, e-mail: harry.blokhuis@wur.nl
Get access

Abstract

The Protocol on Animal Welfare annexed to the EC Treaty in 1999 obliges the European Institutions to fully consider animal welfare in the drafting and implementation of Community legislation. The reform of the common agricultural policies (CAP) foreseen by Agenda 2000 follows the trend of more market oriented measures decoupling subsidies from production. Farming is seen as fundamental to other key societal goals such as food safety and quality, animal welfare, rural development, sustainability etc.

Over the years, recommendations of the Council of Europe and EU Directives specifically concerning farm animal welfare were developed and these are becoming increasingly stringent. European regulations relevant for poultry include Directives on the housing of laying hens, transport and slaughter.

Recently, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) identified animal welfare as a high priority for the coming years. Actions include the development of internationally applicable guiding principles and standards for good animal welfare practice.

Animal welfare is an issue of increasing significance for European consumers and citizens. Since the consumer is the end-user, his or her requirements form the bottom-line for any effort intended to achieve the ultimate fine-tuning necessary to assure societal and economic sustainability of agri- and food-chains (‘from farn to fork’). This means that efforts to inform the consumers and to address their concerns about animal welfare need to be at the forefront of policy and industry agendas.

Keywords

poultry welfareregulationshousingslaughtertransportEU policy.
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 469 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (1976) Explanatory report on the European convention on the protection of farm animals kept for farming purposes. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Bartussek, H. (2001) An historical account of the development of the animal needs index ANI-35L as part of the attempt to promote and regulate farm animal welfare in Austria: an example of the interaction between animal welfare science and society. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Suppl. 30: 34–41.Google Scholar
Blokhuis, H.J., Hopster, H., Geverink, N.A., Korte, S.M. and Van Reenen, C.G. (1998) Studies of stress in farm animals. Comparative Haematology International 8: 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, H.J., Jones, R.B., Geers, R., Miele, M. and Veissier, I. (2003) Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: transparency in the food product quality chain. Animal Welfare 12, 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, M.B.M., Spruijt, B.M., Metz, J.H.M. and Schouten, W.G.P. (2002) Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: Model structure and weighting procedure. Journal of Animal Science 80: 1819–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, H. and Morris, C. (2002) Farm animal welfare aspects of the CAP, RSPCA, London.Google Scholar
Capdeville, J. and Veissier, I. (2001) A method for assessing dairy cows welfare in a loose housing herd focussing on animal observations. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavia Suppl. 30: 62–68.Google Scholar
Council Directive 88/166/Eec (1988) laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens kept in battery cages. Official journal of the European Communities No. L074, 0083–0087.Google Scholar
Council Directive 93/119/Ec (1993) on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing. Official journal of the European Communities No. L340, 0021–0034.Google Scholar
Council Directive 91/628/Eec on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC. Official journal of the European Communities No. L340, 0017–0027.Google Scholar
Council Directive 95/29/Ec (1995), amending 91/628/EEC on the protection of animals during transport. Official journal of the European Communities No. L148, 0052–0063.Google Scholar
Council Directive 1999/74/Ec (1999) laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official journal of the European Communities No. L203, 0053–0057.Google Scholar
European Communities Proposal (2000) Animal welfare and trade in agriculture. WTO Committee on Agriculture Special Session, G/AG/NG/W/19, 28 06 2000.Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council (2001) Interim report on the animal welfare implications of farm assurance schemes. Reference number PB5797, FAWC, London.Google Scholar
Harper, G.C. and Henson, S.J. (2000) Consumer values and farm animal welfare – the Comparative Report. The University of Reading. United Kingdom. EU FAIR CT98–3678.Google Scholar
Luning, P.A., Marcelis, W.J. and Jongen, W.M.F. (2002) Food quality management, a technomanagerial approach. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 323 p.Google Scholar
Main, D.C.J., Whay, H.R., Green, L.E. and Webster, A.J.F. (2003) Effect of the RSPCA Freedom Food scheme on dairy cattle welfare. Veterinary Record 153: 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miele, M. and Parisi, V. (eds) (2000) Atteggiamento dei consumatori e politiche di qualità della carne inItalia e in Europa negli anni novanta, Milano: Franco Angeli. 289 p.Google Scholar
Oie, (2002) Animal welfare. Report of the meeting of the OIE Adhoc Group on animal welfare. 04 2002, Paris.Google Scholar
Regulation Ec/411/98 (1998) on additional animal protection standards applicable to road vehicles used for the carriage of livestock on journeys exceeding 8 hours. Official journal of the European Communities No. L052, 0008–0011Google Scholar
Scahaw(Scientific Committee On Animalhealth And Animalwelfare) (1998) The use of mixtures of the gases carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen for stunning or killing poultry – Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare adopted on 23rd 06 1998.Google Scholar
Scvc (Scientific Veterinary Committee) (1996) Report on the slaughter and killing of animals. Report of the Scientific Veterinary Committee, Animal Welfare Section. Commission of the European Communities. Brussels, 30 10 1996, 31p.Google Scholar
Scvc (Scientific Veterinary Committee) (1997) The killing of animals for disease control purposes. Report of the Scientific Veterinary Committee. 30 09 1997.Google Scholar
Scott, E.M., Nolan, A.M. and Fitzpatrick, J.L. (2001) Conceptual and methodological issues related to welfare assessment: a framework for measurement. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Suppl. 30: 5–10.Google Scholar
Sorensen, J.T., Sandoe, P. and Halberg, N. (2001) Animal welfare as one among several values to be considered at farm level: the idea of an ethical account for livestock farming. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Suppl. 30: 11–16.Google Scholar
Sundrum, A., Andersson, R. and Postler, G. (1994) Tiergerechtheitsindex – 200: Ein Leitfaden zur Beurteilung von Haltungssystemen. Institüts für Organischen Landbau der Universität Bonn, 211 pp.Google Scholar
Tosi, M.V., Canali, E., Gregoretti, L., Ferrante, V., Rusconi, C., Verga, M. and Carenzi, C. (2001) A descriptive analysis of welfare indicators measured on Italian dairy farms: preliminary results. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Vol. 30, suppl. 30: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D.B. (1997) Animal welfare in Europe. European legislation and concerns. Kluwer LAW International, London.Google Scholar