Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:21:08.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uptake and Distribution of Simazine by Oat and Cotton Seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. J. Sheets
T. J. Sheets*
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, University of California, Davis, California
Get access

Extract

For most effective weed control 2–chloro–4,6–bis(ethylamino)–s–triazine (simazine) must be applied to the soil. As a foliar spray it is much less effective. Simazine penetrates into leaves of some plants, but apparently the cuticle is a barrier to foliar absorption of this herbicide. It is absorbed rapidly by roots and is transported upward to the aerial plant parts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1961 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bartley, Clayton. Simazine and related triazines as herbicides. Agricultural Chemicals 12(5):34–36, 113–115. 1957.Google Scholar
2. Brouwer, R. The regulating influence of transpiration and suction tension on the water and salt uptake by the roots of intact Vicia faba plants. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 3:264–312. 1954.Google Scholar
3. Burchfield, H. P. Studies on the relationship between chemical structure and biological activity of the s-triazines. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 18:550–554. 1956.Google Scholar
4. Burchfield, H. P. and Storrs, E. E. Chemical structures and dissociation constants of amino acids, peptides, and proteins in relation to their reaction rates with 2,4–dichloro–6-(o–chloroanilino)-s-triazine. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 18:395–418. 1956.Google Scholar
5. Davis, D. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Sansing, N. G. The absorption and translocation of C14–labeled simazine by corn, cotton, and cucumber. Weeds 7:300–309. 1959.Google Scholar
6. Exer, B. Der Einfluss von Simazin auf den Pflanzenstoffwechsel. Experientia 14:135. 1958.Google Scholar
7. Foy, C. L. The adaptation of qualitative and quantitative techniques for determination of radioactive dalapon in plant tissues. Hilgardia (in press).Google Scholar
8. Gysin, H., and Knüsli, E. Activity and mode of action of triazine herbicides. Proc. British Weed Control Conf. 4:225–233. 1958.Google Scholar
9. Hoagland, D. R., and Arnon, D. I. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agri. Expt. Sta. Cir. 347. 1950.Google Scholar
10. Hylmö, B. Transpiration and ion absorption. Physiol. Plantarum 6:333–405. 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Minshall, W. H. Translocation path and place of action of 3–(4–chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea in bean and tomato. Canadian Jour. Bot. 32:795–798. 1954.Google Scholar
12. Montgomery, M., and Freed, V. H. The uptake and metabolism (of) simazine and atrazine by corn plants (abstract). Res. Prog. Report, WWCC, pp. 93–94. 1959.Google Scholar
13. Moreland, D. E., Gentner, W. A., Hilton, J. L., and Hill, K. L. Studies on the mechanism of herbicidal action of 2–chloro–4,6–bis (ethylamino)–s–triazine. Plant Physiol. 34:432–435. 1959.Google Scholar
14. Roth, M. W. Etude comparée de la réaction du Mais et du Blé à la Simazin, substance herbicide. Compt. rend. acad. sci. 245:942–944. 1957.Google Scholar
15. Sheets, T. J. The comparative toxicities of monuron and simazin in soil. Weeds 7:189–194. 1959.Google Scholar
16. Yamaguchi, S., and Crafts, A. S. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using C14–labeled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161–191. 1958.Google Scholar